In the US, believe that the Su-57 will be the carrier of tactical nuclear weapons

The new US nuclear doctrine, adopted by the administration of Donald Trump, indicates that the fifth-generation Russian aircraft, the Su-57, is intended for use, including nuclear weapons. Su-57 in the future will equip with nuclear ammunition, according to the US, writes the publication National Interest.

If the US assumption made in the doctrine is true, then the Su-57 will be able to use medium-range nuclear weapons against targets covered with a powerful air defense system, along with another Su-34 bomber, in the article. Thus, Russia acquires another carrier of tactical nuclear weapons.

The publication states that the United States fears the Russian modernization of an arsenal of non-strategic nuclear weapons, numbering about two thousand units, at the same time they are developing new types of nuclear warheads, ostensibly in response to Moscow’s actions.

Nevertheless, the article says, Moscow has a very significant amount of tactical nuclear weapons, but for delivering air strikes with such charges, at present there is only Su-34, since Su-57 is not yet ready. This situation may persist for a long time, the newspaper writes, but with the introduction of the Su-57, everything can change, since Russia will receive another platform for striking airborne nuclear weapons.

Comments

[the most important]

Why not? Let them remove their bases from the borders of Russia and there will be no threat to them.

[Hire]

I do not understand, they believe that the Tu-22 can not throw tactical missiles with nuclear warheads? Or the Tu-160?

[Greg Miller]

Nothing than to throw a Tu-22M3. The Kh-32 missile was withdrawn from service in the Russian Federation, and Russia, unfortunately, does not have other missiles with nuclear warheads for the Tu-22M3, and in the face of a reduction in defense spending, it is not expected ....

[bk316]

X-32 missile withdrawn from service in the Russian Federation

Something? Are you raving
She is in 2016 set into service.

[hrych]

Quote: bk316

Something? Are you raving

And for some reason, undeservedly, everyone forgets the X-15 aeroballistic missile, although the turret system of the Tu22m3 bomb bay was made for it. Of course, it is not very long-range, up to 300 km, but it accelerates to 5 max and still carries a 300 kiloton charge. Her current status is in service. Apparently lie on a nuclear storage

[Lozovik]

Not every Tu-22M3 can carry them, the bulk remained in Ukraine.

Quote: hrych

Her current status is in service.

The missile has already been withdrawn from service due to the short shelf life.

[hrych]

Quote: Lozovik

The missile has already been withdrawn from service due to the short shelf life.

Do not fantasize. It is solid fuel; , adopted before the fall of the Union, i.e. not so long as you imagined. This is originally one of the examples of tactical nuclear weapons. It was then that its modifications were adapted for anti-ship and anti-radar options. As a model of tactical nuclear weapons, which did not fall under any treaties and control, it is perfectly stored in the right place, until the right time. And in what form they are, in what condition they are, what they wrote off and what they didn’t write off, your brother doesn’t know for sure

[Lozovik]

Quote: hrych

It is solid fuel; , adopted before the fall of the Union, i.e. not so long as you imagined.

This rocket was first seen in 1989. Already then there were problems with its storage.

Quote: hrych

It was then that its modifications were adapted for anti-ship and anti-radar options.

In service were only with inertial guidance and a range of 200 km.

Quote: hrych

As a model of tactical nuclear weapons, which did not fall under any treaties and control, it is perfectly stored in the right place, until the right time.

To get started, ask how and where missiles and their warheads are stored.

[hrych]

Quote: Greg Miller

X-32 missile withdrawn from service in the Russian Federation

It was only adopted a year ago If you are about the X-22, then you decided to modernize it and after modernization, it will almost pull up to the X-32 performance characteristics. But the shortened X-101 in the form of the X-50. Tu-22M3 will be able to carry six X-50 in the internal compartment and two missiles on the external sling.

[79807420129]

Quote: Greg Miller

Nothing than to throw a Tu-22M3. X-32 missile withdrawn from service in the Russian Federation

Congratulations MR. SOVRAMSHI. At the end of 2016, the X-32 missile officially ADOPTED into service. It is planned to modernize 30 Tu-22M3 aircraft in Tu-22M3M. Enough can throw something on the fan.

[hrych]

Quote: 79807420129

Enough can throw something on the fan

[drunkram]

What? written off above for the X-32, but there is also the X-102

[venik]

Quote: Greg Miller

The Kh-32 missile was withdrawn from service in the Russian Federation, and Russia, unfortunately, does not have other missiles with nuclear warheads for the Tu-22M3, and in the face of a reduction in defense spending, it is not expected ....

========
Yeah! That is, you think that the "calibers" and the X-55 and 101 nuclear weapons do not have ????

[asv363]

Quote: Hire

I do not understand, they believe that the Tu-22 can not throw tactical missiles with nuclear warheads? Or the Tu-160?

Victor, they (from memory) write in their doctrine that Russia intends to use tactical nuclear weapons in a local conflict to achieve superiority in the theater of war or to complete it on conditions favorable to Russia. They write repeatedly, in different formulations, but the meaning is the same.

Tu-160s fall under START-3 and are subject to inspections, just like we have the right to inspect their strategic aviation under a special procedure.

[Hire]

Quote: asv363

they (from memory) in their doctrine write that Russia intends to use tactical nuclear weapons in a local conflict

Hello Sergey
Ameram does not face a local conflict with us. But, if they really want to be afraid of a local collision, let them be afraid in full.

[asv363]

Victor, good evening!

At its core, the "US nuclear doctrine" is a formal document that is politico-military in nature. They write there not only about Russia. In the document that I read before the adoption of the doctrine, mentioned: China, Iran and the DPRK. But there was not a word about India, Pakistan and Israel.

The incontinence in mentioning tactical nuclear weapons clearly hints at the conflicts in which we are participating (from the point of view of the USA). And the presence of a desire to solve them with the help of nuclear weapons.

Whoever invented this overseas is unknown to me.

[Kent0001]

DB, just DB. Or did they already take these planes into account by default

[cost]

Why not? It all depends on the availability of appropriate ammunition.

[Magic archer]

Well, in the states themselves, the same F-35 is also a carrier of tactical nuclear weapons. So a quite worthy answer

[Aaron Zawi]

Quote: Magic Archer

Well, in the states themselves, the same F-35 is also a carrier of tactical nuclear weapons. So a quite worthy answer

That's right. By the way, F-15 can also be a carrier of nuclear weapons in a number of modifications.

[venik]

Quote: Aron Zaavi

That's right. By the way, F-15 can also be a carrier of nuclear weapons in a number of modifications.

=======
Quite right, as, by the way, is the "old man" Su-24 !!!

[Lavrenti Pavlovich]

Quote: the most important

Why not? Let them remove their bases from the borders of Russia and there will be no threat to them.

But did tactical nuclear weapons remain in Russia or were they all destroyed with the tagged and alcoholic? And of course, it would be foolish to think that an airplane of 4, and especially 5 generations, is not capable of being a carrier of nuclear weapons.

[Sergey39]

Yes, don’t need TNW there, Alabuga will be enough

[Maz]

Krnasavcheg is simply handsome

[NEXUS]

Quote: the most important

And why not?

It is believed that the SU-57 will become the carrier of the Dagger complex rocket ... as the booster stage, the 57th is quite suitable for this.

[astepanov]

Well, good. So Russia is not Libya.

[Egorovich]

Since mattress covers are considered, it is necessary to do it, they don’t make shitty stuff.

[bouncyhunter]

Hi Sasha ! Here is just how to compose all sorts of billiards, the arrogant Saxons of the master on the whole Universe. So just ignore yapping and bend your line.

[Egorovich]

Pasha, salute ! Let them compose, their whole policy is an essay written only for their loved ones.

[bouncyhunter]

About that and speech. Their work does not even fall into the category of unscientific fiction.

[Zaurbek]

and rightly believe, who else if not Stealth fighter with internal compartments with 4 KR ... ???

[net0103net]

A simple conclusion from the article of these "Interests" is approximately the following. They have a new model line at the start, the only problem is financing. BUT once Russia has it, then we need it.
Correctly, Yakov Kedmi said - for a long time we will be "newcomers" (meaning a slightly different word). ... If at all we will ... Like that, so Russia is to blame. We are left "with gulkin horseradish" - some old people and children. In China there are more than a billion people, in India it is the same. Both nuclear powers. But no, Russia is the worst.
A well-fed wolf is not at all dangerous. But the herd of hungry wild ants will not leave you any chances, comrades "Interests". About 15 years will pass - and what has been said here will become a reality.

[Vard]

They are afraid ... And they are doing the right thing ...

[Jack O'Neill]

It may well, and why not. 5Kt in the bunker is quite effective.

[Tusv]

Do not tremble distinctly. They forgot about the Dagger with MiG - 31.

[Observer2014]

In the US, believe that the Su-57 will be the carrier of tactical nuclear weapons

It needs to be complete To even think that the Su 57 will not be a carrier of tactical nuclear weapons.

[Troll]

They do not take it; they must take it into account in their calculations. Although .. this campaign is the way it is.

[Rostislav]

Nehai are afraid

[bald]

Tactical yao, can carry anything. The issue is its execution, but this is not for the general audience and under seven locks.

[Lena Petrova]

Quote: net0103net

In China there are more than a billion people, in India it is the same. Both nuclear powers. But no, Russia is the worst.

So there they compare not the number of people, but the number of heads. So far, Russia has the most of them all.

[net0103net]

Madame, you are terribly mistaken. Take an interest in at least the rate of arms buildup. Add to this the fact that a real military threat can come only from a country whose economy is more dependent on external influences than it does. Add to this that wars have long fought not for territory but for the economy (anthropogenic factor). Having done all this, you will see our warheads are very miserable. That is, the end of the world will undoubtedly be, but it will be very miserable, so its probability is very small. Nuclear weapons are much more dangerous in the hands of a country where, against the backdrop of overpopulation, an economic zhor has opened up and the desire to appropriate everything that is bad ... including our warheads, if it comes to that. Do not believe? Then take an interest in where almost all of our nuclear fuel went after the Gorbachev disarmament, for which he received an award from the UK and has not yet received an ax from our head, and than half of Europe and the USA fed the nuclear power plants for 10 years after that! Take an interest, I assure you, you will not be bored! And most importantly, it will lead to more informed assessments ...

[asv363]

HEU-KNOW began under Yeltsin.

[little country]

Quote: net0103net

Having done all this, you will see our warheads are very miserable. That is, the end of the world will undoubtedly be, but it will be very miserable, so its probability is very small. Nuclear weapons are much more dangerous in the hands of a country where, against the backdrop of overpopulation, an economic zhor has opened up and the desire to appropriate everything that is bad ... including our warheads, if it comes to that. Do not believe?

In E R Yu! +10

[Lena Petrova]

The conversation, in fact, was about India and China. There is a multiple difference. An order of magnitude. NF of Russia is not subject to any doubtful revaluations. Enough for everyone, in which case.

[net0103net]

Girl, I understand you ... But you see, the military also wants to eat. Especially the troops and industry directly or indirectly related in this to your nuclear weapons. If they begin to starve, then for a start they will slowly but surely sell all the stocks of uranium secondary, which are our strategic stocks of nuclear fuel. Uranium fluoride is a gas. It is stored in ordinary cylinders under pressure right on the street and is not radioactive, but it is very, very expensive. Therefore, they will sell everything. You will not even know about it, no one will talk about it to you, the gas will simply evaporate, as has already happened more than once. Our country has long and densely hooked on cheap export of all incredibly rare and terribly expensive. Entire castes of people do not sow and do not plow and built their future on the fact that for a long time they sold THERE over the hill all the orders and victories of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers and all our sovereignty all the best that our state and Russian people in general could have as heirs great culture and numerous scientific and technological achievements. And no one has punished them yet, quite the contrary - they hold positions in the government and ministries and teach their children how to live, teach them at MGIMO or abroad, teach to despise Russia and everything connected with it. Everything that we accumulate and invent, or have already done so, is now really in their hands .. Guess what happens if these pigs suddenly turn out to be completely neglected, as in the 90s, and they got used to live at the expense of others very well .. That's right, one day you will wake up, but ... not in a nuclear power. We across the country now have systemic failures at all social levels, which lead only to the above scenario and nothing more. And in China this is not so in India either. To throw a large stone, which you call nuclear weapons, one carrier rocket is not enough, you need to be really strong. It is necessary to have views on the future, taking into account the consequences of such a decision as the use of nuclear weapons. The United States is ready for use, China too, India is on the way, and Russia is NOT. We cannot even get together as a people. Russia is here, and Ukraine is there, there is still Belarus - very good people, but they are also somewhere else both territorially and in political decisions and in the economy. No matter how many missiles are built under such conditions, they are suitable only for one, to rust in mines or to take off one last time. Our advantage in your nuclear weapons now costs very little, like our ruble, and money was spent on it unmeasured and as much was stolen. What I told you about from the very beginning. Therefore, we have no advantage.

[NN52]

net0103net

Did you measure your temperature today?
Or decided to make an impression on the girl?
I have not read such an action, with a detailed description, for a long time ...

[net0103net]

Well, excuse me so "abruptly." Here, after all, you usually chat about fashion and secular gossip, yes?

[Vkd dvk]

Quote: net0103net

Girl, I understand you ... But you see, the military also wants to eat. Especially the troops and industry directly or indirectly related in this to your nuclear weapons. If they begin to starve, then for a start they will slowly but surely sell all the stocks of uranium secondary, which are our strategic stocks of nuclear fuel. Uranium fluoride is a gas. It is stored in ordinary cylinders under pressure right on the street and is not radioactive, but it is very, very expensive. Therefore, they will sell everything. You will not even know about it, no one will talk about it to you, the gas will simply evaporate, as has already happened more than once. Our country has long and densely hooked on cheap export of all incredibly rare and terribly expensive. Entire castes of people do not sow and do not plow and built their future on the fact that for a long time they sold THERE over the hill all the orders and victories of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers and all our sovereignty all the best that our state and Russian people in general could have as heirs great culture and numerous scientific and technological achievements. And no one has punished them yet, quite the contrary - they hold positions in the government and ministries and teach their children how to live, teach them at MGIMO or abroad, teach to despise Russia and everything connected with it. Everything that we accumulate and invent, or have already done so, is now really in their hands .. Guess what happens if these pigs suddenly turn out to be completely neglected, as in the 90s, and they got used to live at the expense of others very well .. That's right, one day you will wake up, but ... not in a nuclear power. We across the country now have systemic failures at all social levels, which lead only to the above scenario and nothing more. And in China this is not so in India either. To throw a large stone, which you call nuclear weapons, one carrier rocket is not enough, you need to be really strong. It is necessary to have views on the future, taking into account the consequences of such a decision as the use of nuclear weapons. The United States is ready for use, China too, India is on the way, and Russia is NOT. We cannot even get together as a people. Russia is here, and Ukraine is there, there is still Belarus - very good people, but they are also somewhere else both territorially and in political decisions and in the economy. No matter how many missiles are built under such conditions, they are suitable only for one, to rust in mines or to take off one last time. Our advantage in your nuclear weapons now costs very little, like our ruble, and money was spent on it unmeasured and as much was stolen. What I told you about from the very beginning. Therefore, we have no advantage.

A sea of ​​aplomb mixed with a sea of ​​stupidity.
https://vuzlit.ru/729332/galogenidy_urana
It would be nice to first look through Wikipedia than to mold humpbacked uranium with fluoride, saying that it is a gas.

[net0103net]

1. In Eastern culture, quoting someone is very bad form and characterizes such a person as mentally inferior. Here are the Chinese, it turns out, I have friends and people of my level, and you - no, don’t pull.
2. Hang your Wikipedia in the toilet and watch our solid Soviet and Russian documentaries about the extraction and processing of uranium ore, if you do not understand what you are writing about. You learn a lot of interesting things there. Our Russian uncles, scientists from the Moscow region, and not only you will tell everything and show and demonstrate. Then add your link to what you saw and look in the mirror. If you look carefully, you will see a three-letter word on your forehead.
3. If you are an engineer, then not knowing the uranium ore enrichment cycle and the technology for safe storage of uranium is a shame for a country that has the largest reserves of this substance and has nothing else. Your salary and all your benefits now, this is oil and uranium, everything else was profiled in the 90s, including people like you.

4. Including about uranium fluoride you will receive more than reliable and more than exhaustive information ...

[Vkd dvk]

Quote: net0103net

1. In Eastern culture, quoting someone is very bad form and characterizes such a person as mentally inferior. Here are the Chinese, it turns out, I have friends and people of my level, and you - no, don’t pull.
2. Hang your Wikipedia in the toilet and watch our solid Soviet and Russian documentaries about the extraction and processing of uranium ore, if you do not understand what you are writing about. You learn a lot of interesting things there. Our Russian uncles, scientists from the Moscow region, and not only you will tell everything and show and demonstrate. Then add your link to what you saw and look in the mirror. If you look carefully, you will see a three-letter word on your forehead.
3. If you are an engineer, then not knowing the uranium ore enrichment cycle and the technology for safe storage of uranium is a shame for a country that has the largest reserves of this substance and has nothing else. Your salary and all your benefits now, this is oil and uranium, everything else was profiled in the 90s, including people like you.

4. Including about uranium fluoride you will receive more than reliable and more than exhaustive information ...

You are in vain so dismissive of Vicki. It is designed for people like you, narrow-minded, and stupid. This is your level.
I believe that quoting others is a way to connect other people's knowledge to the conversation.
You not only do not know how to do this, but you yourself are not trying to prove your case. Explain the difference between a substance of the same class — metal halide — sodium chlorine — a crystalline substance from its chemical relative.

Halides are compounds of halogens (F, Cl, Br, I) with less electronegative elements. Metal halides in the lower oxidation states (+1, +2, sometimes +3) are typical salts - solids with an ionic type of crystal lattice, with high melting points, usually well soluble in water.
Halides - Encyclopedia MPlast.by
Please not from Wikipedia.

[net0103net]

I'm tired of chatting with you. You write everything correctly and at the same time you are terribly mistaken. How can this be? There is a specific technology, understand how it works. Use my recommendations in the past comments if interested. I refuse to insist on anything further for free. For an external audience, one of us will remain wrong, but thanks to you, I leave the question open. Do not write to me anymore.

[NN52]

net0103net

It's not about the technology you are writing about ...
And in the presentation of your material. You are wrong about the past, present and future ..
And such trolls are definitely not needed here ...

[net0103net]

You have not seen trolls yet ... Talk a lot. Better to spend a white sheet and black letters on the facts. You are not the master of everything. You have not proven anything to anyone. You are like sheep who are not able to get through the new open gates. Here you can write anything at all. However, life always tests for strength any of your knowledge and belief. I passed it, but you didn’t. Not yet or not already - I don’t know. Better take my advice - specify what you think you know in theory. It will be correct and useful. The rest is irrelevant.

[NN52]

net0103net

I was not going to prove anything to anyone. Especially to you.
Regarding the rams, you are in vain .......
What I went through to you, man, in the "sheep's clothing" and never dreamed ...
And about my knowledge and, especially, my beliefs, it’s not for you to judge. And by the way .. I did not change my beliefs and did not intend ... unlike you ..
And your advice .. well, you understand ..
And you really, talk a lot here ... comrade ...
Think about it ...

[Old bun]

Beautifully wiped his nose No-No, plus. All the same, Soviet education makes itself felt

[ANCIENT]

It will still have an annihilator, and a photon gun! !!

[san4es]

In the US, believe that the Su-57 will be the carrier of tactical nuclear weapons

... And what's the point? .. There are more reliable ways

WINGED ROCKET X-555
Subsonic strategic air-launched cruise missile, modification X-55, equipped with a conventional warhead (warhead).
The missile is equipped with an inertial-Doppler guidance system, which combines terrain correction with satellite navigation. X-555 can be equipped with different types of warheads: high-explosive, penetrating or cluster with different types of elements. Compared to the X-55, the mass of the warhead was increased, which led to a decrease in flight range to 2000 km. However, the X-555 can be equipped with conformal fuel tanks to increase the cruise missile range to 2 km. According to data from open sources, the circular probable deviation (CVO) of the rocket is from 500 to 5 m.
According to the data obtained from the video recording of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Kh-555 missiles were used from Tu-160 and Tu-95MS aircraft, which carried them in the fuselage compartments.
Strategic missile carriers of these types are equipped with a MKU-6-5 drum launcher, on which 6 air-based cruise missiles can be placed.
http://tass.ru/spec/syria

[faiver]

also revealed to me an open secret ....
so then we and an-26 can be a carrier of tactical nuclear weapons

[Yak28]

In the US, believe that the Su-57 will be the carrier of tactical nuclear weapons

Tactical nuclear munitions include aviation nuclear bombs, and as I understand it since the 60s and 70s, almost any fighter bomber or front-line bomber can carry them.

[Sarmat Sanych]

Briefly: EASY!

[Sarmat Sanych]

Quote: net0103net

Madame, you are terribly mistaken. Take an interest in at least the rate of arms buildup. Add to this the fact that a real military threat can come only from a country whose economy is more dependent on external influences than it does. Add to this that wars have long fought not for territory but for the economy (anthropogenic factor). Having done all this, you will see our warheads are very miserable. That is, the end of the world will undoubtedly be, but it will be very miserable, so its probability is very small. Nuclear weapons are much more dangerous in the hands of a country where, against the backdrop of overpopulation, an economic zhor has opened up and the desire to appropriate everything that is bad ... including our warheads, if it comes to that. Do not believe? Then take an interest in where almost all of our nuclear fuel went after the Gorbachev disarmament, for which he received an award from the UK and has not yet received an ax from our head, and than half of Europe and the USA fed the nuclear power plants for 10 years after that! Take an interest, I assure you, you will not be bored! And most importantly, it will lead to more informed assessments ...

For a long time I have not heard more enchanting delirium . Only a truly stupid person unfamiliar with the topic of strategic nuclear forces can compare the nuclear potentials of Russia and China (I generally am silent about the Indians, the level of Pakistan). The Chinese still do not even have normal strategic nuclear submarines, only a couple of clones of our time of the 70s (based on 667 BDRs are only much worse), and the SLBMs on them do not reach the ancient American Polaris and our first R-29 versions. The launch of these bast shoes is 50% unsuccessful, we don’t have to talk about twin launches or volleys of 4 or 16 missiles, as for China, it is the ХХIII century (it is worth saying that the Americans are not capable of more than double volley). Plus, Chinese strategists do not go anywhere except near their base on Hainan, as they rattle and are easily spotted by Americans. Multi-purpose workers are even worse, there is not even one level of our first "Cat" series. Few people know that apart from the ancient awkward DF4 and DF-5A, the China has not yet been able to create any modern mbr at least mine-based, with normal cast weight, even the most recent DF-41 can stand 1 warhead per 1 mt (in doubt) or 10 to 20 ct (as our tactical weapon ) or up to 4 blocks of 150 ct. Note - this is a mine (mobile was never completed) weighing 80 tons, without any means of overcoming missile defense, rather slow deployment, and there are 15-20 of them. Everything else in comparison with us and amers in China is generally liquid, their half-flying JI-2 SLBM (tested for 30 years, fifty shot scientists) carries a maximum of 4 blocks of 90 kt, and then in the future, at the moment, analysts agree on what is implemented option only with a monoblock part. For comparison, the abandoned weight of our "Blue", "Liner" and Amerian "Trident" is 2800 kg, the French M-51 has similar (slightly inferior) indicators, "Voivode" carries 10 warheads of 750 ct each, the same will carry RS-28. Even the “Yars” and “Bulava” which are scolded for low power deliver 4 × 500 kt (6 × 150) and 6 × 150 (10 × 100), respectively, so there are all the latest missile defense systems that are not implemented by either amers or the French, and China also had no dreams about this. Also, the PRC does not have (and will not have in the next 2 decades) strategic aviation (we will not joke about the Kh6 Khrushchevsky Tu-16 clone), they could not copy the miniature tactical nuclear charge for the X-55. According to many Washington analysts, China’s nuclear weapons still pose no real threat to the United States or the Russian Federation, and even lag behind the French strategic nuclear forces. And this despite the fact that the USSR in the 40s - 60s trained 120000 Chinese specialists, handed over the full technological documentation for all of its projects, built them from scratch entire industries - rocket science, nuclear industry with 783 plants, 97 research centers and 11 test centers ( including 4 underground), in China itself, 6000 Soviet scientists and 85000 technologists visited long missions. Despite such a fantastic present, over the 60 years of the existence of large-scale nuclear missile programs and multibillion-dollar investments, China has not acquired either a nuclear triad or even at least a sufficient arsenal of effective delivery vehicles. After the collapse of the Union, the Chinese bought and stole from Russia and Ukraine everything that was possible and EVEN THIS (!) Did not significantly help them create anything worthwhile. Only in the last 8 years, at least 3 scientists have been convicted of espionage in favor of the PRC in selling secrets of the Bulava, they say they handed over all the documentation, but this did not help the synanthropes.

[flicker]

In the US, believe that the Su-57 will be the carrier of tactical nuclear weapons

Well, if you think, then so be it ... you must respect the "partner"

[nikoliski]

Right, be afraid

[Fkjydjckfrgh]

Well, mother, geniuses. The carrier of atomic (as well as chemical and biological) weapons can be at least An-2.

[Ros 56]

Our man himself is not Greg, and he will not even call Miller. So dear forum users, spit and do not waste time on any provocateurs. By the way
and that it is suspended under the wing of the Tu - 22

[keeper03]

I think that tactical nuclear weapons should be completely banned !!! This is a time bomb!

[gippernano]

Quote: Hire

I do not understand, they believe that the Tu-22 can not throw tactical missiles with nuclear warheads? Or the Tu-160?

One child. They have a simple task: to emphasize that the Su-57 is a deshman version, with a cloud of underpricing, and the fact that Russia again conceived the evil, against their good NATO bases.