American red idealist

32
My late father is dedicated


Reed John (1887 – 1920) was an American socialist journalist, author of the well-known works Along the Front and 10 Days that Shook the World.



John Reed was born in Portland, Oregon. Mother - the daughter of a Portland entrepreneur, father - a representative of the company for the production of agricultural machinery. The journalist’s father was a “solid, upright pioneer” in the spirit of Jack London.

From his father, John inherited a first-class mind and courage. After graduating from school in 1906, he was sent to study at the most famous university in America - Harvard. After spending 4 at Harvard, John became a member of a team of swimmers, cheerleaders, was a member of the student magazine's editorial board and president of the student choir. During this period he took part in the activities of the socialist club.

John received an excellent education - he became a certified literary scholar. At the university, he carefully studied the works of socialist thinkers. And already in this period he became the author of deep publicistic articles.

After receiving his degree, John Reid went on a trip to Europe.

Deciding to become a journalist, John Reid began his career in New York. Still being the editor of the satirical university leaflet "The Mocker" showed himself to be a master in a light style. Now he writes stories, poems, dramas. Publishers began to pay him serious fees, and major newspapers ordered reviews of major events.


John Reed. Fig. "10 days that shook the world." M., 1957. From the author's library

His problem was social problems. So, when a major strike of textile workers began in Peterson - John Reed was in its midst. He participated in the Mexican Revolution in 1913 as an employee of the Metropolitan magazine. A report on this event appeared in the magazine Metropolitan, and later in the book Revolutionary Mexico.

With the beginning of the First World War, Reed went to Italy, and then to France. Reed did not sympathize with any of the participating States of the war.

Subsequently, the journalist returned to New York, remaining there until the end of 1914. In 1915, he went to Thessaloniki, then to Serbia, Bulgaria and Romania. Reed found himself in Russia, as well as in Constantinople. These events became the basis of the book "Along the Front", published in April 1916.


The title page of the book by John Reed "Along the Front." From the author's library.

In the spring of 1915 as a war correspondent, D. Reed traveled to Russia and the Balkans, making the 2 th trip to European theaters.

John Reed got to Eastern Europe at a time when the German command, concentrating powerful shock forces on the Eastern Front, was trying to take Russia out of the war with a powerful blow. At the same time, a lull on the Western Front, bought by the blood of a Russian soldier, enabled the Allies to prepare for new decisive battles.

Desperate adventure almost cost the life of a correspondent. Supplied with dubious documents, he arbitrarily crossed the river. Prut and penetrated into the location of the Russian army. Only a happy confluence of circumstances saved John Read from being shot on suspicion of espionage.

The author of this book tried to remain as an objective and bona fide chronicler. John Reed tries impassively to reproduce all that he witnessed. The style of the correspondent record caused a certain superficiality of the presentation.

The author noted that the Russian capitalists, the petty bourgeoisie and the proletariat were “very patriotic”, because the paradox of the war was that the struggle against the Germans was at the same time a struggle against the Russian bureaucracy.

He was particularly struck by the many faces and national diversity of Russia.

Soon D. Reed returned to the United States. But even after 1917’s entry into his world war in April, the journalist’s position on the latter remained unchanged.

John Reed was a born war correspondent. The danger could not hold him - he always made his way to the front. An eyewitness recalled how a journalist in September 1917 on the Riga front near Wenden, when the German artillery bombarded the nearby village with shells, almost died - but was delighted.

During his travels, John Reid sought to get to the root of the identified problems, emphasizing their social overtones. So it was in the study of Mexican problems during social conflicts in Peterson and Colorado. Returning from the latter, he told about the massacre in Ludlo - how miners were thrown out of their homes, and the soldiers were shot to flee the workers. And, addressing Rockefeller, he said: “These are your mines, these are your hired bandits and soldiers. You are killers! ”

As a result, John Reed was brought to justice - but for anti-militarist articles. This became possible after the transformation of the USA into a belligerent state.

By this time, Reed returned from the battlefields of the First World War with curses as a social phenomenon - like a bloodbath. In the magazine "Liberator" John Reid published a fierce article - and, together with other editors, was tried for treason. The prosecutor of New York tried his best to get a conviction from the jury. Reed and his comrades defended their convictions, and John said that he would not even fight under the American flag — by painting pictures that he had become an eyewitness to. And ... the editors were acquitted.

In the summer of 1917, Mr. Reed hurried to Russia, which was in a revolutionary frenzy.

John Reed was an active participant in the October events in Petrograd, as an eyewitness to the dissolution of the Pre-Parliament, the construction of barricades and the applause of V. I. Lenin and G. E. Zinoviev, when they emerged from the underground after the fall of the Winter Palace.

He told about all these events in his famous book Ten Days That Shook the World. The book was published in the USA in 1919 (sustaining only the 3 edition this year) and first published in Russian in the USSR in 1923. The work was highly appreciated by V. I. Lenin in the preface to the American edition. During the second visit of John Reed to Soviet Russia in 1919, V. I. Lenin wrote a preface for a new American edition of the book — but with a preface by V. I. Lenin, it was published in the US only in 1928.


Title page of John Reed's 10 Days That Shook the World. From the author's library.

V.I. Lenin noted the tremendous interest in D. Reed’s book, recommended it to workers of all countries, wanting to see translated into all languages ​​- after all, she “gives a truthful and unusually lively written account of events so important for understanding what a proletarian revolution is, what is the dictatorship of the proletariat. "

NK Krupskaya also wrote that in this book “the first days of the October revolution are unusually vividly and strongly described. This is not a simple list of facts, a collection of documents, it is a series of living scenes so typical that each of the revolutionists should recall the similar scenes he witnessed. ”

John Reed’s book before 1957 was published in Russian 11 times: in 1923, in 1924 (4 editions), in 1925, in 1927 (2 editions), in 1928, 1929 and 1930. Almost all editions of the book in Russian, starting with the first, were published with prefaces by V. I. Lenin and N. K. Krupskaya.

Reed picked up material for the book everywhere — for example, he collected complete sets of newspapers Pravda, Izvestia, all brochures, proclamations, posters, and posters.

The fact that the journalist was in control of the situation is shown by the following fact.

The Central Committee of the RSDLP (b) 10 of October 1917 adopted a resolution written by V.I. Lenin on the current moment, recognizing the uprising as inevitable and ripe and proposing to all organizations of the party to be guided by this postulate in their practical activities. L. B. Kamenev and G. E. Zinoviev voted against this resolution, and L. D. Trotsky suggested not starting an uprising before the opening of the Second Congress of Soviets. John Reed particularly emphasized the position of Leonid D. Trotsky at the congress.

John Reed noted that the strength of V.I. Lenin as the leader of the Bolshevik revolution was that it combined intellectual-theoretical power with organizational genius. D. Reed called V.I. Lenin an "extraordinary leader." V.I. Lenin possessed, as John Reed wrote, "a powerful ability to uncover complex ideas in the simplest words and give a deep analysis of the concrete situation with a combination of insightful flexibility and daring courage of the mind."

The author of the book was inspired by the ideas of the Bolshevik Party, and after returning from Russia, attempts were made in the United States to confiscate materials collected by John Reed - including through gangster attacks to steal a book from the publishing house.

After the publication of the Ten Days, the American magazines did not publish a single line of it, and the journalist actually created his own journal — became the editor of the Revolutionary Century magazine, and then the Kommunist magazine. Reed promoted his views, driving around America and participating in conferences, and finally became one of the founders of the Communist Workers Party.

D. Reed fought against the American intervention in Soviet Russia - and in this connection 5 was brought to justice once and 20 was arrested once.

It was Russia that turned John Reed into a consistent revolutionary. The journalist’s writing desk was littered with books by K. Marx, F. Engels and V. I. Lenin. And John Reed became an adept of the Russian revolution.

As a result, in 1919, Mr. Reed arrived in Moscow and began working at the Communist International to merge the two US Communist parties, and was elected a member of the Executive Committee of the Comintern.

In July-August 1920, he became a delegate to the 2-th Congress of the Comintern. He traveled a lot around Russia, collecting material for a new, third, book - about the everyday life of peaceful construction.

In the fall of 1920, returning from the Congress of the Peoples of the East, he fell ill with typhus and on the night of October 19, 1920 died in Moscow.

The remains of John Reed buried in Red Square, near the Kremlin wall.

Sources of
Reed John. Along the front. M., 1916.
Reed John. 10 days that shook the world. M., 1957.

Literature
Reed John. 3 ed. M .: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1969.
Kireeva I.V. Literary works of John Read. Bitter, 1974.
Dangulov A.S., Dangulov S.A. Legendary John Reed. M .: Soviet Russia, 1978.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    7 June 2018 05: 48
    Such was the American friend of Russia. Interesting personality, thanks to the author
  2. +7
    7 June 2018 05: 53
    Thanks so much for the article. I’ll definitely read the book. I have 2 of this series: provided by you and Bogdanov --- RED STAR and his other novels. I know that interest in events in Russia was huge around the world. In addition to John Reed, Herbert Wells came. Diego Rivera, leader of the Communist Party of Mexico, a famous artist and revolutionary .. Norwegian Fridtjof Nansen also came to Russia, who made public the crimes of the interventionists, this facilitated the withdrawal of their troops from Russia.
  3. +5
    7 June 2018 06: 43
    Bright personality. One of the best representatives of the profession.
  4. +6
    7 June 2018 06: 49
    By this time, Reed had returned from the battlefields of World War I with the curses of war as a social phenomenon - as blood bath. In the magazine Liberator, John Reid published a furious article. Reed and his comrades defended the beliefs, and John stated that I wouldn’t even fight under the American flag - outlining the paintings, which he had become an eyewitness.

    Frank, um, an eccentric who did not understand that in order to avoid blood baths and to fight.
    V.I. Lenin noted the great interest in the book of D. Reed, recommended it workers of all countries

    Still, a manual for the overthrow of legitimate authority.
    Reed picked up material everywhere for the book - so he collected kits newspapers "Pravda", "Izvestia", all brochures, proclamations, posters and posters

    At the same time, there were hundreds of OTHER newspapers in Russia at that time.
    John Reid noted that the strength of V.I. Lenin as the leader of the Bolshevik revolution was that it combined intellectual-theoretical power .

    The "intellect" was enough for only two "new" "powerful" theoretical "principles: SELECT and PAST. Although these principles acted on the big road a long time ago.
    The journalist's desk was littered with books K. Marx, F. Engels and V.I. Lenin.

    Sad story fool
    In the fall of 1920, returning from the Congress of the Peoples of the East, he fell ill with typhus and on the night of October 19, 1920 died in Moscow.

    This is the result of the GV, which was so admired ...
    The remains of John Reed buried in Red Square, near the Kremlin wall.
    Native Americanism not accepted? And time, time ....
    1. +9
      7 June 2018 07: 43
      Quote: Olgovich
      Still, a manual for the overthrow of legitimate authority

      But is law, laws, power - is it something sacred and infallible, given to us by some higher powers, and which in no case can be changed? No, of course. On their own, neither power nor laws are good or bad. Laws and power are established by people, established in certain interests, and they are constantly, throughout the course of human history, changed.
      Quote: Olgovich
      The "intellect" was enough for only two "new" "powerful" theoretical "principles: SELECT and PAST. Although these principles acted on the big road a long time ago.

      According to these principles, all states act. First of all, by the force of laws (of which you are so worried), and if laws are not respected, then by brute force.
      It is important for whom they take and force. In the Republic of Ingushetia, for example, by robbing the majority, a minority made profit.
      Quote: Olgovich
      This is the result of the GV, which was so admired ..

      Lies.
      1. +6
        7 June 2018 08: 06
        Quote: rkkasa 81
        But is law, laws, power - this is something holy and infalliblegiven to us by some higher forces, and which in no case can be changed?

        In-in: the bandit in the gateway just as reasoning!lol
        Quote: rkkasa 81
        According to these principles, all states act.

        Yeah, carrot looks like a finger too! But these are different things, know! Yes
        In a normal state, they take taxes and attract salaries. In abnormal-act like ilichi
        Quote: rkkasa 81
        It is important for whom they take and force. In the Republic of Ingushetia, for example, by robbing the majority, a minority made profit.

        You robbed everyone, but no cash, no one
        Quote: rkkasa 81
        Lies.

        So do not lie! hi
        1. +7
          7 June 2018 08: 33
          Quote: Olgovich
          In-in: the bandit in the gateway just as reasoning!

          The fundamental difference between the state (unless of course the state is normal), and the bandit is that - the state, taking part of the earned with their citizens, let the collected what is needed for the whole country, for all citizens. For the army, for education, medicine, factories, factories, etc. A thug in the gateway selects everythingand spends the selected only on myself, at taverns and girls.
          Quote: Olgovich
          So do not lie!

          Mr. yap, lying is your part Yes
          Confirm your bullshit - "This is the result of the GV, which is so admired" - or as always Yes will you wag?
          1. +5
            7 June 2018 10: 26
            Quote: rkkasa 81
            The fundamental difference between the state (unless of course the state is normal), and the bandit is that - the state, taking away a part of what was earned from its citizens, lets the collected money do what the whole country needs, all citizens. For the army, for education, medicine, factories, factories, etc.

            keywords "unless of course the state is normal."
            As Ambrose Beers said there: "A crime is a violation by citizens of the state’s monopoly on the same actions."
            1. 0
              7 June 2018 21: 44
              Is it Beers and not Mark Twain?
    2. +2
      7 June 2018 17: 12
      so that there were no bloody baths and it was necessary to fight.

      Yeah ... "I would kill everyone, if only there was no war ..."
      It’s strange that this is Reed an eccentric ...
      After all, man clearly writes - he returned with curses to the war, as a social phenomenon. Man curses war. About. Kli. On the. Et Compares with a blood bath. The humanist seems. And you are eccentric for it. Somehow it’s not good.
      "Intelligence" was only enough for two "new" "powerful" theoretical "principles: SELECT and PASTE.

      Here it is as if incomprehensible (only possible to me). Do you mean that you did not have the intellect to understand the works of Lenin and you reduced them to the philistine "take and force"? And it turns out that the intellect of Lenin was seen by Cassin, Churchill, Russell, Bernal and dozens of other people who distinguished themselves in their fields ... But I did not see the forum member. It happens.
      Sad story

      Why?
      This is the result of the GV, which was so admired ...

      This is the "butterfly effect", so the "butterfly effect" ... Or a violation of causal relationships in a single citizen ... Do not understand ...
      1. 0
        8 June 2018 05: 24
        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
        After all, man clearly writes - he returned with curses to the war, as a social phenomenon. Man curses war. About. Kli. On the. Et

        A person does NOT want to fight in order to stop the bath. in the Second World War put it to the wall.
        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
        Do you mean that you did not have the intellect to understand the works of Lenin and you reduced them to the philistine "take and force"?

        Alas, you lacked the intelligence to understand who my phrase about Reid’s statement about Lenin is dedicated to. request
        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
        And it turns out that Lenin’s intellect was seen by Cassin, Churchill,

        Churchill b "intelligence" ilich
        Intelligence of Lenin was defeated at that moment when his destructive power was exhausted and independent, self-healing functions of his searches began to appear.

        Great writer Ivan Bunin gave this specimen an exhaustively accurate characterization
        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
        Why?

        Read it again: you can understand. Though.... No.
        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
        This is the "butterfly effect", so the "butterfly effect" ... Or a violation of causal relationships in a single citizen ... Do not understand...

        It can be seen... Yes hi
        1. 0
          8 June 2018 09: 56
          1) Does the phrase "war as a social phenomenon" say something to you ..? Reed evaluates the war as a social phenomenon. It says that war is unnatural. Do you disagree with this?
          He is talking about WWI. Remind countries goals in WWI? So there is no need for manipulation - a comparison with the Second World War is not by any means.
          That is, Reed's speech, of course, is not about a war of liberation from an external invader, but about a war for the interests of the ruling elites at the hands of ordinary people.
          2)
          Alas, you lacked the intelligence to understand who my phrase about Reid’s statement about Lenin is dedicated to.

          Oh, already my intellect is not to your liking, not only Ilyich. But what is it, you will not please the right word ...
          True, in my message it was a sarcastic expression, but if you didn’t understand, then it’s not scary, because we have intellect at the forefront, and not a sense of humor (in relation to our conversation)
          3)
          Churchill b "intelligence" ilich

          Well, are you again in your repertoire and don’t quote Churchill as a whole? Even from the standpoint of Churchill's extremely negative attitude towards communism, he surprisingly appreciates Lenin. It’s just that the blinders should be removed from the eyes so that it becomes clear.
          Well, if they brought Churchill's torn phrase, then why didn’t they cite the phrases mentioned by me, Cassin, Russell, Bernal (others to name?). They said "A", say "B".
          4)
          The great writer Ivan Bunin gave this specimen an exhaustively accurate description.

          So bring this characteristic - there is not a word about intelligence, Bunin simply complains about the ruin of the country by the Bolsheviks. Ruin from the point of view of Bunin. And it would be better if he brought his entire "Mission of Russian Emigration". I think you didn’t do this not because it is large in volume, but because it contains only emotions without a bit of common sense - the Antichrist drives the Antichrist with the Antichrist - this is its brief but exhaustive content. By the way, the great writer Ivan Bunin gave such characteristics to so many people (and this I quote only fellow writers), which is clear because one can simply see his bile:
          1. Vladimir Vladimirovich Mayakovsky - "the lowest, most cynical and harmful servant of Soviet cannibalism"
          2. Isaac Babel - “one of the most vile blasphemers”
          3. Marina Ivanovna Tsvetaeva - “Tsvetaeva with her incessant shower of wild words and sounds in verses all her life”
          4. Sergey Ivanovich Yesenin - "sleep and do not breathe on me with your messianic moonshine!"
          5. Anatoly Borisovich Mariengof - "the rogue and the greatest villain"
          6. Maxim Gorky - "a monstrous graphomaniac"
          7. Alexander Aleksandrovich Blok - "an unbearably poetic poet. He fools the audience with nonsense"
          8. Valery Yakovlevich Bryusov - "morphist and sadistic erotomaniac"
          9. Andrei Bely - "about his monkey of fury and nothing to say"
          10. Vladimir Nabokov - "fraudster and verbiage (often just tongue-tied)"
          11. Konstantin Dmitrievich Balmont - "a violent drunkard who, shortly before his death, fell into a fierce erotic insanity"
          12. Maximilian Voloshin - "fat and curly esthete"
          13. Mikhail Kuzmin - "ne ..... ast with a half-naked skull and a coffin face, painted like a corpse of pros ..... ki"
          14. Leonid Andreev - “drunken tragedian”
          15. Zinaida Gippius - "unusually nasty little soul"
          16. Velimir Khlebnikov - "A rather gloomy small, silent, either drunk, or pretending to be drunk"

          You will find what people familiar with him say about Bunin in their memoirs. Well, seriously, do not be lazy, find it. They all speak well of his literary talent, as they all speak of his terrible changeable character.
          Read it again: you can understand. Though....

          I read it. I still do not understand. Therefore, I again ask for clarification why the sad story is that the works of Marx, Engels and Lenin are in the library of a person?
  5. +5
    7 June 2018 07: 11
    The author noted that the Russian capitalists, the petty bourgeoisie and the proletariat were "very patriotic", because the paradox of the war was that the struggle against the Germans was at the same time a struggle against the Russian bureaucracy

    As for the capitalists, it’s understandable - their mother’s war is native, they profited from it well. As for the proletariat, by the 17th year, it had become much wiser good
  6. +4
    7 June 2018 07: 29
    What the American cannot deny is observation. So, in his famous book, D. Reed noted that the Russian people no longer needed priests (he noticed that they had ceased to be baptized) and that they wanted to build their happy kingdom.
    1. +1
      7 June 2018 13: 41
      Quote: bober1982
      What the American can’t refuse, is observation
      So, in his famous book, D. Reed noted that the Russian people no longer need priests (drew attention to the fact that stopped baptizedI)

      Yes, yes, that’s probably why, in the USSR official holidays were Christmas, Easter, Ascension, Spirits day, Trinity, Transfiguration, Assumption of the Virgin.- still long and long years.
      Reid saw (not only here) only what he wanted to see and what Iliche wanted.
      For this lies in the wall. Yes
      1. +2
        7 June 2018 13: 56
        Incidentally, he was not the first - who was laid against the wall, but was among the observers of the first burials near the Kremlin wall, the poor were buried by his definition - those who died at the very beginning of armed clashes. The red idealist, as the article says, in the afterlife also did not want to believe.
  7. +19
    7 June 2018 08: 51
    So among Americans, we always had friends
    Even in the most difficult times
    And that is great
    1. 0
      7 June 2018 21: 00
      "Nick" you have is remarkable. What is so?
      1. +16
        8 June 2018 08: 21
        Nicky will discuss, most of which belong to the category of "don’t sew a mare’s tail"? lol
        Well - just consider me Baba Yaga laughing
  8. +6
    7 June 2018 09: 36
    Very good material, as, indeed, other materials of the author. I have had his book since childhood, the edition of 1928 of the year. From my grandfather. I remember that I read it and ... at a history lesson and issued ... that everything in the revolution was wrong and no one was in the gate, as in the film "Lenin in October", did not fit. Well ... teacher - "Where from ?!" And I told her - "From Dean Reed. Edition of 1928 of the year." "Is there a more modern one?" Brought her 1957-th ... "N-yes ..." - she twisted her lips sourly. "But after all, as I all say!" After that, "everything" ceased to be authority for me.
    1. +1
      7 June 2018 17: 09
      Quote: kalibr
      Very good material, as, indeed, other materials of the author. I have had his book since childhood, the edition of 1928 of the year. From my grandfather. I remember that I read it and ... at a history lesson and issued ... that everything in the revolution was wrong and no one was in the gate, as in the film "Lenin in October", did not fit. Well ... teacher - "Where from ?!" And I told her - "From Dean Reed. Edition of 1928 of the year." "Is there a more modern one?" Brought her 1957-th ... "N-yes ..." - she twisted her lips sourly. "But after all, as I all say!" After that, "everything" ceased to be authority for me.

      From Dean Reed ?! belay
    2. 0
      7 June 2018 20: 56
      I had a similar situation with Gumilyov’s work.
  9. +2
    7 June 2018 12: 07
    Did not resist noodles. Young ishsho was. The psyche is not stable. Where was she to stand? In Amerikandii? When there the orders? Although the Internet was not yet there, the zombie box and the radio too, only paper newspapers, and then you ... Too close to the epicenter was ... Yes, he was not lucky. recourse
  10. 0
    7 June 2018 13: 43
    Alexey Vladimirovich. somewhat unexpected article (in my opinion), and yes even devoted to you to your father.
    If it's not a secret, why is it dedicated to him? hi
    1. +3
      7 June 2018 19: 10
      This, Olgovich, is one of your most tactless comments. What could be more tactless? ----- Continue questions
      For me, this is a very expected article, let’s say not about Dina Reed, but by topic: Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Russian History at Astrakhan State University, Member of the Association of Historians of the First World War, PhD in Law, Aleksey Oleinikov, author of many books and articles whose research is of great importance, simply cannot fail to touch on the theme of the Great October Socialist Revolution.
      The dedication is also understandable.
      1. 0
        8 June 2018 05: 31
        Quote: Reptiloid
        This, Olgovich, is one of your most tactless comments. What could be more tactless? ----

        fool
        See the beginning of the article: Initiation information was written by the author FOR US.
        1. +1
          8 June 2018 07: 41
          Quote: Olgovich
          Information about the initiation was written by the author FOR US.
          Like all articles of the author, how his books are written for us, for you and for all other residents of Russia and abroad.
        2. +17
          8 June 2018 08: 09
          Olgovich
          Alexey Vladimirovich. somewhat unexpected article (in my opinion), and yes even devoted to you to your father.
          If it's not a secret, why is it dedicated to him?

          This dedication is written because my late father was a great admirer of John Reed and, moreover, a convinced communist.
          And I, in general, am convinced that the right of the author is to devote his work to the one to whom he considers it necessary. About the same says the law.
          Just like anyone can read these works. Articles after all are written, as I understand, for a wide audience.
          For me personally, this is the main thing. hi
  11. +1
    7 June 2018 15: 52
    The whirlpool of Russian unrest dragged on even the American.
  12. +5
    7 June 2018 17: 12
    Clever people always reached out to the Union, until Khrushchev began to ruin it.
  13. +2
    8 June 2018 20: 08
    Someone was drawn to Chege Vare, someone to Trotsky, someone to Lenin.
    Youthful maximalism + increased craving for justice and the specifics of the era.
    Early guy and burned out.
    ATP
  14. 0
    30 August 2018 01: 22
    And where did Reed learn Russian and did he know it? Reading his book you feel emotions, but how faithfully did he convey the events taking place? How do true historians rate the credibility of his reporting?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"