Military Review

Lavrov in Pyongyang: Partners retain sanctions, but require denuclearization from the DPRK

45
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov arrived on a visit to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. The main topic of discussion: the steps of the DPRK to meet its southern neighbor and the possibility of lifting the anti-North Korean sanctions.


Before his visit to Pyongyang, Sergey Lavrov spoke on the phone with the head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo. At the same time, in the publication of the press service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs there is no information that the conversation concerned the DPRK. It is indicated that Lavrov and Pompeo discussed the issues of Syria, Ukraine, and also "agreed on the need to work to overcome differences through professional dialogue."

Lavrov in Pyongyang: Partners retain sanctions, but require denuclearization from the DPRK


Arriving in Pyongyang, the Russian Foreign Minister laid flowers at the monument to Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il, and then met with his North Korean counterpart Lee Young Ho.

According to Sergey Lavrov, Russia proceeds from the fact that the consideration of the issue of resolving the nuclear problem on the Korean Peninsula cannot be complete as long as sanctions apply to Pyongyang. The Russian Foreign Minister noted that sanctions should be phased out.

Lavrova quotes RIA News:
How to move on to this is already a question of the art of negotiators. But in one sitting, this is not done. In one sitting, denuclearization cannot be provided.


Sergey Lavrov noted that at each stage there should be a movement towards each other - only this way the problem can be solved.
Recall that earlier talking about disrupting the future meeting of Trump and Kim Jong-un. However, later the US rhetoric softened somewhat. And the other day, the DPRK leader had already held the second meeting with the South Korean counterpart, demonstrating that if it were not for Washington, Pyongyang and Seoul could agree on the basis of mutual consideration of interests.

The United States, in fact, is putting forward an ultimatum: first - the abandonment of the nuclear potential, and after - several wagons of "democratic support" rice. Pyongyang makes it clear that this is not going to happen, remembering Trump his words about “North Korea’s possible repetition of the fate of Libya.”
Photos used:
Russian Foreign Minister
45 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 210ox
    210ox 31 May 2018 07: 52
    +5
    It's time to admit that we are at war with those same "partners" .. What kind of "telephone discussions" can they have with them at the moment?
    1. Logall
      Logall 31 May 2018 08: 20
      +4
      Quote: 210ox
      Today, 07: 52
      It's time to admit that we are at war with those same "partners"

      Dmitry, hi but in international law there is no concept of "cold war"! I think that telephone negotiations are not for bilateral relations, but for the partners of our "partners" ...
      1. cniza
        cniza 31 May 2018 08: 23
        +3
        Good day to all! hi , wars never stop, unfortunately, they move from one phase to another.
        1. Logall
          Logall 31 May 2018 08: 29
          +5
          Victor, welcome!
          Quote: cniza
          wars never stop, unfortunately, they move from one phase to another.

          I would not want to hot phase... I really would not want to ...
          1. cniza
            cniza 31 May 2018 08: 40
            +2
            Nobody wants to, but a lot but ...
            1. You Vlad
              You Vlad 31 May 2018 09: 39
              +2
              Quote: cniza
              Nobody wants to, but a lot but ...

              And Ukraine, and Syria, and Georgia, Yugoslavia is this a war or all the same without?
    2. asv363
      asv363 31 May 2018 08: 30
      +10
      I, in the year 1983, and in a terrible dream, could not have dreamed that we in the UN Security Council jointly vote with the Western "partners", while imposing sanctions on the DPRK.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 31 May 2018 08: 56
        +3
        Quote: asv363
        I, in the year 1983, and in a terrible dream, could not have dreamed that we in the UN Security Council jointly vote with the Western "partners", while imposing sanctions on the DPRK.

        In 1983, in the DPRK, everything was fine with the brains. And people lived richer there than in the USSR. Even in Komsomolsk on the Amur in 80x, North Korean cars were often met, mainly they drove on the Volga. And then the dad of the current sun-like, began to drive the blizzard and received a bunch of sanctions.
        1. Grandfather Makar
          Grandfather Makar 31 May 2018 09: 43
          +3
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          In 1983, in the DPRK, everything was fine with the brains. And people lived richer there than in the USSR. Even in Komsomolsk on Cupid in the 80s

          Interesting facts Sasha did not know
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          And then the dad of the current sun-like, began to drive the blizzard and received a bunch of sanctions.

          And many countries dream of such a "blizzard" (they have their own nuclear weapons and even carriers) ..
          They are now talking with the DPRK on equal terms (even the USA is wary ..))) And our Lavrov did not go there for a reason, we will agree on how to confront the USA and other liberals together .. This is not just a courtesy visit! We will unite the Koreans .. And then it will be a serious force, and there the Japanese will want to free themselves from the yoke of the USA and other world bugs!
          1. You Vlad
            You Vlad 31 May 2018 10: 15
            0
            Quote: Ded-Makar
            . And then it will be a serious force, and there the Japanese will want to free themselves from the yoke of the USA and other world bugs!

            This will not be possible until the amers have a printing press hi
            1. Grandfather Makar
              Grandfather Makar 31 May 2018 10: 37
              +4
              Quote: you Vlad
              Quote: Ded-Makar
              . And then it will be a serious force, and there the Japanese will want to free themselves from the yoke of the USA and other world bugs!

              This will not be possible until the amers have a printing press hi

              There are some, but work is being done in this direction .. You can’t refuse dollar wrappers so far in the world (there are a lot of things tied to them, etc.) But they began to squeeze out slowly and accumulate gold (this is the basis of any currency for now)
              In general, the ruble (as liberals used to call him "WOODEN"))))
              The huge resources of our country are behind it! After all, we ALL have Oil, Gas, gold, diamonds, rare-earth metals .., bioresources and finally pure sources of water! While we are purely robbed with these inflated courses, etc.
              The ruble should be the most stable currency in the world .. Because it is provided with such resources that not a single country in the world has ever dreamed of! And we are all pissed off and believe in all sorts of dollar and euro rates .. Eh Russia A generous soul! angry
              1. You Vlad
                You Vlad 31 May 2018 10: 51
                +4
                Together with China, we are against the global financial world system! And apparently, we will succeed, since the British also invested (rats are fleeing the ship).
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 31 May 2018 08: 58
        +6
        Most probably never dreamed that the country would fall apart!
        We do not live in dreams, it can bring such a reality that it would be desirable not to wake up at all .... what happened to some!
    3. Dashout
      Dashout 31 May 2018 10: 49
      +5
      Quote: article
      Lavrov spoke by telephone with the head of the US Department of State

      here diplomats ... talker bird what to say?
      says, says, then expresses concern, says again ...
  2. Teberii
    Teberii 31 May 2018 07: 52
    0
    The news says that we are talking about hamburgers in North Karey. So the platform for dialogue is very extensive.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 31 May 2018 08: 57
      +6
      Quote: Teberii
      The news says that we are talking about hamburgers in North Karey.

      Gorbachev also began with McDonalds in Moscow. This is koment with meaning wink
      1. Grandfather Makar
        Grandfather Makar 31 May 2018 09: 48
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Teberii
        The news says that we are talking about hamburgers in North Karey.

        Gorbachev also began with McDonalds in Moscow. This is koment with meaning wink

        Oh, you're right Alexander .. God forbid! The collapse of the USSR began precisely from this. Until now, we cannot recover, and worse, we are sitting in complete surroundings and sanctions (although it seems that the capitalist country has not been against democracy for a long time)))) bully
        1. You Vlad
          You Vlad 31 May 2018 10: 19
          +1
          Quote: Ded-Makar
          The collapse of the USSR began precisely from this.

          It began from the moment our elite finished off with the western, according to sources on environmental issues. Sorry to get into a conversation hi
          1. Grandfather Makar
            Grandfather Makar 31 May 2018 10: 47
            +3
            Quote: you Vlad
            Quote: Ded-Makar
            The collapse of the USSR began precisely from this.

            It began from the moment our elite finished off with the western, according to sources on environmental issues. Sorry to get into a conversation hi

            What nafig ecology ..? We were simply robbed of ALL in one and two and ALL!
            Now by the way, they want to repeat again .. They surrounded and pressured with sanctions and threatened with war, they tried to play off again with someone, etc.
            1. You Vlad
              You Vlad 31 May 2018 11: 18
              +1
              Quote: Ded-Makar
              What nafig ecology ..?

              They say on this subject the Western elite finished off ours and away we go ... Ours wanted theirs!
              1. Grandfather Makar
                Grandfather Makar 31 May 2018 11: 25
                +1
                Quote: you Vlad
                Quote: Ded-Makar
                What nafig ecology ..?

                They say on this subject the Western elite finished off ours and away we go ... Ours wanted theirs!

                Well, something happened with these "greenpeace", etc. I remember in all the news, maybe I don’t know .. hi
                1. You Vlad
                  You Vlad 31 May 2018 11: 29
                  0
                  Quote: Ded-Makar
                  Well, something happened with these "greenpeace", etc. I remember in all the news, maybe I don’t know

                  Well, here’s the name it all starts with a small one! Before that, we didn’t get in touch! They searched for an outlet to our elite and found it. As a matter of fact, I certainly don’t know, but this is the source of Fursov.
            2. You Vlad
              You Vlad 31 May 2018 11: 36
              +1
              Quote: Ded-Makar
              Now by the way, they want to repeat again .. They surrounded and pressured with sanctions and threatened with war, they tried to play off again with someone, etc.

              This is due to the fact that we finally began to defend their national interests.
  3. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 31 May 2018 08: 06
    +2
    Pyongyang makes it clear that this will not work, recalling Trump his words about "a possible repetition of the fate of Libya by North Korea."

    Exactly. The word is not a sparrow, but nothing sounds so much in the mouths of hawkish politicians of a country overseas.
  4. steelmaker
    steelmaker 31 May 2018 08: 31
    +4
    And who is stopping us from lifting sanctions from the DPRK? What did the DPRK do wrong to us, that Lavrov supported these sanctions? And who is stopping Lavrov from building relations with the DPRK in the interests of Russia, not the United States?
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 31 May 2018 08: 57
      0
      Quote: steel maker
      What did the DPRK do to us,

      Turbid water at our borders, playing into the hands of amers
      1. asv363
        asv363 31 May 2018 09: 45
        +3
        The unification of the two Koreas to us and the PRC is like a sickle of Faberge, if all American troops together with their missile defense deployed in the South Caucasus do not leave the peninsula.

        The United States is troubled by water, not the DPRK.
  5. Vard
    Vard 31 May 2018 08: 43
    +1
    The United States lives in its own invented world ... based on this, it makes decisions whether to bomb or not ... this is what scares ...
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 31 May 2018 11: 02
      +2
      Quote: Vard
      The USA lives in its invented world ...

      "It’s more convenient to manage an invented world" (c)
  6. Snail N9
    Snail N9 31 May 2018 08: 45
    +5
    I don’t know how anyone, but this word “partners”, which diplomats in Russia use to refer to the country's sworn enemies, “just infuriates me”. It is curious that "in the West", both diplomats and politicians and leaders, with respect to Russia, do not apply the slogan "Russian partners", but only use the word (s): "Russia", "this country", "Russian government" , "Russian government officials", etc. When will this humiliating custom that has come from the "Yeltsin era" cease to call enemies "partners"?
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 31 May 2018 09: 02
      +1
      Quote: Snail N9
      When will this humiliating custom that has come from the "Yeltsin era" cease to call enemies "partners"?

      This is called diplomatic courtesy.
      1. Monster_Fat
        Monster_Fat 31 May 2018 09: 33
        +5
        This is stupidity, not "diplomatic politeness." In Soviet times, diplomats of the USSR, too, were emphasized "polite." So personally, would you begin to call a person constantly shitting on you a “partner”? A "partner" is one who does one thing with you and who can be trusted, and these wreckers are even worse than "enemies" - small dirty tricks, just scoundrels.
        1. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 31 May 2018 11: 03
          +1
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          "Partner" is one who does one thing with you and you can trust,

          Hmm, what about poker partners? laughing
          1. Monster_Fat
            Monster_Fat 31 May 2018 11: 08
            +1
            And, well, if "by game" .... then yes .... What "play"? As if not to "play out" .... winked
  7. Strips
    Strips 31 May 2018 08: 53
    +2
    The United States has not really agreed on anything with the DPRK yet, and Lavrov has already reached ultimatums and more.


    Judging by the tone of Lavrov’s statements, Russia is simply envious that the United States is doing what Russia and China could do and instead of making themselves loyal to the DPRK, they simply kept the DPRK barely barely afloat supporting the sanctions with the United States.

    And now DPRK can change its ally, or at least evade complete dependence on Russia and China.
    1. mihey
      mihey 31 May 2018 09: 08
      +4
      Did you understand what you wrote? Particularly amused:
      Quote: Tiras
      And now DPRK can change an ally

      Yeah, they’ll be replaced by the USA and they will sacrifice Una as a “democracy” fool
    2. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 31 May 2018 11: 06
      +2
      Quote: Tiras
      And now DPRK can change an ally

      laughing laughing laughing Perhaps you should not judge by yourself and your own kind.
  8. Old26
    Old26 31 May 2018 09: 30
    0
    Quote: steel maker
    And who is stopping us from lifting sanctions from the DPRK? What did the DPRK do wrong to us, that Lavrov supported these sanctions? And who is stopping Lavrov from building relations with the DPRK in the interests of Russia, not the United States?

    You asked a bunch of questions right away. What prevents us from lifting the sanctions? if it were specifically the sanctions of Russia, then nothing would have hindered. It does not interfere, for example, to lift the Americans the sanctions that they imposed personally. But all the recent times, sanctions were established by the UN Security Council. And only he can remove them, and not some of the countries that voted for sanctions

    What did the DPRK do to us? Alexander Romanov, in principle, has already answered. The DPRK acted against the interests of Russia. In particular, we were opposed to the DPRK having its own nuclear weapons, since it had signed all existing agreements with the IAEA, but contrary to everything, it had made weapons and did not give a damn about all the treaties and opinions of its neighbors.

    What prevents building relationships in the interests of Russia? So they are built in areas not affected by sanctions
    1. asv363
      asv363 31 May 2018 10: 20
      +1
      Firstly, there is a legal and absolutely legal method of withdrawing from the NPT - notified the IAEA and is free after 60 days. Yes, the NSG will almost certainly stop supplying the country.
      Secondly, the JCPOA was approved by a UN Security Council resolution, but the United States has withdrawn from it (or is in the process).
  9. steelmaker
    steelmaker 31 May 2018 10: 03
    +4
    I decrypt. Russia could block the sanctions in the Security Council if they are against the interests of Russia. And they are against it, for one reason - the DPRK is a neighbor, and they have done nothing wrong to us. After all, we do not introduce sanctions against Ukraine, although they constantly spoil us, although we could have introduced them a long time ago. 2 I already wrote that if Russia and China would give guarantees for the security of the DPRK, then this nuclear race did not exist. Why is Russia building a nuclear power plant in Turkey, but not the DPRK? S-300,400 to whom only we do not deliver on credit, but DPRK is impossible? They threw the DPRK to its mercy, so they get out. Therefore, let's be honest to the end - all this tension at our borders was created artificially by our Foreign Ministry and there will still be roofing felts - Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, etc.
  10. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 31 May 2018 10: 42
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: asv363
    I, in the year 1983, and in a terrible dream, could not have dreamed that we in the UN Security Council jointly vote with the Western "partners", while imposing sanctions on the DPRK.

    In 1983, in the DPRK, everything was fine with the brains. And people lived richer there than in the USSR. Even in Komsomolsk on the Amur in 80x, North Korean cars were often met, mainly they drove on the Volga. And then the dad of the current sun-like, began to drive the blizzard and received a bunch of sanctions.

    In 1983 and in Libya, Iraq, Syria, Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union beat better. Then, in the DPRK, they began to "drive the blizzard", but in Libya, Iraq, Syria, Yugoslavia and the USSR, the brains became even better. Therefore, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Yugoslavia and the USSR do not have sanctions, no one threatens them and everything flourishes there.
  11. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 31 May 2018 10: 53
    +1
    What did the DPRK do to us? Alexander Romanov, in principle, has already answered. The DPRK acted against the interests of Russia. In particular, we were opposed to the DPRK having its own nuclear weapons, since it had signed all existing agreements with the IAEA, but contrary to everything, it had made weapons and did not give a damn about all the treaties and opinions of its neighbors.

    The existence of the DPRK is of course at odds with Russia's interest. The interest of Russia was defended by the USA in Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, Georgia and now in Syria and Ukraine. And sanctions are also in Russia's interest. The DPRK is troubled by the water of Russia with its weapons. If suddenly the DPRK surrenders and disappears from the face of the earth, then what God's grace awaits Russia and the whole world that one cannot even believe.
  12. Comrade Ivanov
    Comrade Ivanov 31 May 2018 14: 55
    0
    Judas Iscariot in Pyongyang!
  13. earloop
    earloop 31 May 2018 15: 04
    0
    The "nucleons" accumulated by hard work must be forever and carefully stored and securely guarded. This is a charm of the people.
  14. Old26
    Old26 31 May 2018 18: 13
    0
    Quote: Kostadinov
    The existence of the DPRK is of course at odds with Russia's interest. .

    No need to juggle. This is not about the existence of the DPRK, and not the existence of the DPRK is contrary to the interests of Russia, but what the DPRK has been doing and has been doing for the past 25-30 years. And she does that as a result of these actions, we at least have a US missile defense system next to us. The presence of nuclear weapons in the DPRK also does not meet the interests of Russia

    Quote: Kostadinov
    The interest of Russia was defended by the USA in Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, Georgia and now in Syria and Ukraine. .

    I say it again. Do not distort

    Quote: Kostadinov
    And sanctions are also in Russia's interest.

    probably you consider yourself smarter than Lavrov? Just what you do then in VO. Why not in the Foreign Ministry or in the place of Putin at all ????

    Quote: Kostadinov
    If suddenly the DPRK surrenders and disappears from the face of the earth, then what God's grace awaits Russia and the whole world that one cannot even believe.

    if the DPRK disappears from the face of the Earth - then so be it. And the DPRK itself may be to blame for the fact that the DPRK will disappear for the most part. Worse in the world from her disappearance will not be. Only the "reserve" will disappear ...