Military Review

Destroyers Arleigh Burke Flight III. Construction has begun!

42
American shipbuilding companies loaded with military orders, with enviable regularity, launch the construction of new destroyers such as Arleigh Burke. The next works of this kind started on May 7, but this time the start of metal cutting is of particular importance. The industry began construction of the first ship of the new Flight III series. In the distant future, it is precisely such destroyers with a number of important advantages over their predecessors that will become the basis of the naval grouping. In the meantime, the manufacturer will have to spend several years on construction work.


May 7 at the Huntington Ingalls Industries plant (Pascagula, PCs. Mississippi), work was started on the construction of the newest destroyer USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG-125). Employees of the enterprise began construction by cutting the first 100 tons of metal, which were to take their place in the hull of the future ship. To date, the HII plant has managed to build three and a half dozen destroyers such as Arley Burke, but the current order is special. The company was honored to launch the production of the first ship of the new series. At the same time, the plant has a great responsibility.


Future destroyer USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG-125) on a slide from US Navy


According to current plans, the construction of a new ship will be completed early next decade. After all necessary tests, it will be handed over to the naval forces. In accordance with the construction contract signed, the destroyer will be handed over in 2023. Thus, a new combat unit with improved capabilities will be ready for service only after five years.

The first destroyer of the new series is named after Jacklin Harrell "Jack" Lucas (1928-2008) ordinary first class. Being well developed, in the 1942, at the age of just 14, he managed to get into the Marine Corps. During the battle for Iwo Jima, a pair of Japanese grenades hit the trench with Lukas and several of his comrades. He tried to throw away one of them, and covered the other with himself. Fortunately, only the thrown grenade exploded. Jack Lucas received numerous wounds, and his comrades remained intact and continued to fight. For heroism and the salvation of fellow first-class private JH. Lucas was awarded the Medal of Honor.

The new ship, named after the hero, is being built on the updated project Arleigh Burke / DDG-51 Flight III. This differs from the previous modernization projects by the special scale of innovations, among other things, which demanded a serious redesign of the ship design. Reportedly, 45% hull and superstructure designs were modified to install a variety of new equipment needed to increase the destroyer's potential. First of all, such changes are associated with new energy systems and with the installation of a promising radar station.


Three-dimensional model of the future ship. Figure by Huntington Ingalls Industries / huntingtoningalls.com


However, most of the innovations of the third series of destroyers "hide" inside the main structures and are almost invisible from the outside. At the same time, the designers had to increase the size of the ship. As a result, it will be noticeably larger than its predecessors, but it will retain characteristic contours and a recognizable silhouette with a large deck dedicated to rocket armament and a high superstructure.

According to the project, ships DDG-51 Flight III will have a length of 160 m with a maximum width of 20 m and a normal draft of 10 m. Normal displacement will be reduced to 9300 t. In the stern compartments and superstructure, the launcher and aggregates of the main power plant will remain in their places. The superstructure will retain the hangars for two helicopters, and the aft deck will continue to perform the functions of a take-off platform.

Destroyers of the third series should be equipped with a pair of gas turbine engines General Electric LM2500-30, connected with two propellers. The total capacity of such an installation - 100 ths. The estimated maximum speed of the ship exceeds 35 nodes. Cruising range (at an economic speed) is at least 4 thousand nautical miles. Despite a noticeable increase in size and displacement, new ships will be faster than their predecessors.

Destroyers Arleigh Burke Flight III. Construction has begun!
Shipyard staff at an event dedicated to the beginning of metal cutting. Photos of Huntington Ingalls Industries / huntingtoningalls.com


The main innovation of the project Flight III, followed by a variety of changes in the design of the entire ship, affects the composition of radio-electronic equipment. The destroyers of the first two series were completed with radar stations of the AN / SPY-1 family. Such equipment has proven itself well, but it has become morally obsolete. The characteristics of these radars no longer fully meet current requirements, and therefore new ships that are to serve in the distant future must carry a different type of station.

In the superstructure of the ship USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG-125), phased antenna arrays of the perspective AN / SPY-6 radar will be mounted. Due to the increased power and performance, such a station will be able to earlier find air and surface targets with a small effective area of ​​dispersion. Thanks to this, the destroyer will be able to learn about the threats earlier, and in addition, the crew will have more time for the correct response and the choice of the correct answer to them.

According to open data, the AFAR promising radar is built using new technologies and materials, which dramatically increases its characteristics. In particular, the sensitivity of the AN / SPY-6 station in comparison with the existing AN / SPY-1 is increased 30 times. Also used a new configuration of antenna arrays, so that the ship will receive a circular review. Taking into account modern threats, the developers of new radio-electronic equipment have provided for passive radar mode. The ship will be able to find targets by their own signals without emitting themselves.

The possibility of detecting aerodynamic and ballistic targets with the subsequent issuance of target designation for various weapons. Radar AN / SPY-6 built with the concept of IAMD (Integrated Air and Missile Defense) and is able to work with air defense or missile defense.


Layout of the ship Arleigh Burke / DDG-51 Flight III. Photo Navyrecognition.com


High performance and new features were obtained at a very high price. For the installation of a larger and heavier station, the most serious processing of the hull and superstructure of the carrier ship was required. In addition, AN / SPY-6 imposes increased requirements on power supply, which led to the refinement of the corresponding ship systems. Finally, the radar needs enhanced cooling means. Nevertheless, all these engineering tasks were successfully solved, and a promising radar can be installed on new-type serial ships.

To control the shooting of certain types of weapons, the ship receives a radar type AN / SPQ-9B. Also, to monitor the situation and search for targets can be used opto-electronic system Mk 20 Mod 1 with day and night channels. Saved most of the sonar systems to search for underwater targets. The ship is equipped with modern means of electronic warfare: as jamming equipment, and production rockets Mk 53 Nulka.

Receiving new radio-electronic systems, the destroyer Arleigh Burke of the third series retains most of the existing weapons. First of all, the new project involves the use of two universal vertical launchers Mk 41. In the bow of the ship, in front of the superstructure, is placed a similar system with 32 cells for containers with missiles. In the aft superstructure there is a second installation twice the capacity. The ammunition of the two installations may include 96 missiles of various types. The ship of the type Flight III retains compatibility with existing and promising anti-aircraft missiles, surface-to-surface missiles and anti-submarine complexes. The composition of the ammunition, the types and number of missiles transported should be determined in accordance with the characteristics of the upcoming combat service.


The nose of the destroyer. Photo Navyrecognition.com


Also on board the ship there is an installation Mk 45 with a 127 caliber mm gun, a pair of Mk 38 anti-aircraft guns with 25-mm guns and one Phalanx CIWS system with 20 mm caliber guns. Artillery weapons to combat surface or air targets are complemented by four large-caliber machine guns M2HB. Anti-submarine rocket armament reinforced with a pair of three-tube torpedo tubes caliber 323 mm.

To solve a variety of tasks aboard the destroyer will be four motor boats carried on the central part of the deck. The stern hangars and the take-off area are designed to operate a pair of UH-60 helicopters or similar.

The new destroyer and the following ships DDG-51 Flight III will be crews of 380 officers and sailors. As the Arleigh Burke project developed, the number of ship crews increased steadily. The latest modifications of the destroyers, including some versions of the Flight II series, are distinguished by an especially large crew.

According to current plans, in the foreseeable future, destroyers of the new version of Arleigh Burke Flight III will have to change the ships of previous modifications in a series. Over time, their mass production will significantly improve the grouping of surface ships, increasing the overall potential fleet. At the same time, specific plans for the near future have already been identified, and concepts are being formed in accordance with which the Navy will be developed in the long term.


New configuration of the superstructure of the ship. Photo Navyrecognition.com


The Pentagon and the Bath Iron Works shipyard have already signed a contract to build the second Flight III ship. Destroyer USS Louis H. Wilson Jr. (DDG-126) will begin to build in the very near future. According to known data, the contractor has already begun preparations for its launch. The finished ship will be handed over to the customer almost simultaneously with "Jack H. Lucas" - in 2023-24.

At the beginning of 2018, representatives of the US military announced further plans. This year, the Pentagon plans to sign new contracts for the construction of another 10 destroyers. In this case, now we will talk only about the ships of the latest modification. Various variants of the project Flight II are now discontinued. It is expected that the simultaneous order of a dozen new ships will allow to achieve substantial savings in finances. In addition, it will speed up the construction process to some extent and will bring the time of delivery of the last ship ordered.

However, the construction of the next batch of ships will begin no earlier than the contracting enterprises will fulfill the existing orders. For example, four destroyers of the Arleigh Burke type and several other warships are currently located at different stages of readiness at the plant of Huntington Ingalls Industries. Their delivery will free up production facilities for the fulfillment of new contracts.


View of the stern. Photo Navyrecognition.com


According to the famous plans of the Pentagon, the construction of Arleigh Burke destroyers of various modifications will continue until the thirties. During this time, the naval forces will be able to receive several dozen ships that initially meet modern requirements. In this case, from a certain time, the total number of destroyers will almost not change, since the fleet will have to start writing off the oldest ones that have exhausted their resources. New ships in this case will be a shift for decommissioned.

It is expected that the third series of destroyers will be produced before the beginning of the thirties. Further plans of the military for the construction of such ships are unknown. At the turn of the last decades, the military department proposed to develop in the future a new project for the modernization of ships. The Arleigh Burke Flight IV versions could go on the 2030-32 series and be built at least until the beginning of the next decade. However, Congress did not endorse such a proposal. The funding offered for such a project was decided to redirect to other programs.

In the coming years, the Pentagon may form new plans and even get permission from Congress to implement them. However, so far one of the most important tasks in the context of the construction program of surface ships is the construction of the first destroyer Arleigh Burke / DDG-51 Flight III. The main work on the assembly of structures will be completed no later than the beginning of the twenties, and in the future the finished ship will be put to the test. If no major problems are identified, in the 2023, the US Navy will receive a new combat unit.

Just a couple of weeks ago, the United States launched the construction of the first ship of the new type, which has the most serious differences from its predecessors. In about five years, this destroyer will enter the combat strength of the naval forces, and then more than a dozen sisterships will follow. The Arleigh Burke ships of the Flight III version have high hopes of both military and political nature. Whether they will justify the expectations and whether they will be able to realize all the potential that was pledged - we will know later

On the materials of the sites:
http://navy.mil/
http://newsroom.huntingtoningalls.com/
http://navyrecognition.com/
https://navaltoday.com/
https://defensenews.com/
http://navsource.org/
Author:
42 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mvg
    mvg 25 May 2018 05: 41
    +4
    Oh Lord ... twenty-five again. Again, a bunch of repeated sentences .. Does the author even read the material? And this is despite the fact that only recently there was an article on this topic in VO.
    What raw material is served.
    1. tchoni
      tchoni 25 May 2018 06: 20
      +1
      And what do you want? Kiril is a master of pasta. But this time, at least the topic is adequate.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 25 May 2018 06: 34
        +1
        Destroyers Arleigh Burke Flight III. Construction has begun!
        so what ... we also drew on paper already ... they say there is even a layout, soon another layout can be done.
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 30 May 2018 11: 09
          +1
          Yeah, yes, there’s only 68 “Berkovs” already in service with them .. even the younger version, but what about us? Purely hypothetically, without taking into account the naval component of the strategic nuclear forces, they will only drown all our fleets together, even the forces of these destroyers pointless to argue!
      2. mvg
        mvg 25 May 2018 09: 22
        +3
        If you remove the "dubbing" of words, then the article will be reduced by three times. And a similar article has just been on VO. What is the topic adequate? I didn’t draw anything new. And after copying paragraphs from different resources, you need to read the whole thing yourself. You read and already "ears are burning." Nobody would entrust him to write at school students.
        How pleasant it is to read Andrei from Chelyabinsk or Sergey Linnik, it is so unpleasant to read the "robot"
    2. Chertt
      Chertt 25 May 2018 07: 50
      +1
      Destroyers Arleigh Burke Flight III. Construction has begun

      Very sorry. It was hoped that all striped money would swell into the non-floating and non-shooting project "Zumwalt".
      1. Hole puncher
        Hole puncher 25 May 2018 08: 33
        +1
        Quote: Chertt
        Very sorry.

        What do you care about other people's money
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 25 May 2018 08: 49
          +5
          Quote: Puncher
          What do you care about other people's money

          I don’t like that instead of the three meaningless "Zamvolta" periodically breaking, the "potential enemy" will have twenty wonderful destroyers
      2. venik
        venik 25 May 2018 09: 23
        0
        Quote: Chertt
        Very sorry. It was hoped that all striped money would swell into the non-floating and non-shooting project "Zumwalt".

        ==========
        Yes! It seems that with this "trough", something "did not work out" for them !!! (Either too expensive, or too unfortunate, or maybe both!)
      3. -Pollux
        -Pollux 25 May 2018 13: 02
        0
        Quote: Chertt
        Very sorry.

        Why is it a pity? Hai rivet this squalor. Look in the article about anti-ship weapons for this vessel - you will be pleasantly surprised. The Americans in New Burke have changed everything except that they really need to be replaced - the MK-41.
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 25 May 2018 13: 13
          +4
          Quote: Pollux
          The Americans in New Burke have changed everything except that they really need to be replaced - the MK-41.

          What a strange idea, change universal launchers. Standardization is the strength of the US Navy and its allies
          Quote: Pollux
          Hai rivet this squalor

          Well, that’s nonsense. Arly Burke is objectively one of the best Destroyers in the world.
          1. -Pollux
            -Pollux 25 May 2018 13: 38
            +1
            Quote: Chertt
            What a strange idea, change universal launchers.

            The idea is great - to change some UVP to other larger UVP.
            Quote: Chertt
            Well, that’s nonsense. Arly Burke is objectively one of the best Destroyers in the world.

            Given how few types of destroyers are in the world right now, everyone will be on the list of the best.
            Your "best destroyers in the world" simply has nothing to attack enemy ships.
            1. Chertt
              Chertt 25 May 2018 13: 49
              0
              The AGM-158C LRASM missiles are not bad (just under the MK-41.) Yes, and the anti-ship Tomahawks are also quite serious weapons. This is from what is in service
              1. -Pollux
                -Pollux 25 May 2018 14: 00
                +4
                Quote: Chertt
                The AGM-158C LRASM missiles are not bad (just under the MK-41.)

                Only LRASM-A, a subsonic missile that is unable to overcome modern air defense, will fit into the MK41, and they are not yet in service, they are still being tested.
                Quote: Chertt
                And the anti-ship “Tomahawks” are also quite serious weapons.

                There is no such version of the tomahawks in the arsenal of the American Navy, all attempts to make PKR from the tomahawks have failed.
                Quote: Chertt
                This is from what is in service

                From what the Arly Burke type destroyers are armed with, this is a preparatory subsonic anti-ship missile launcher “harpoon” on old versions of destroyers, torpedoes and the Mk45 EMNIP cannon.
                Everything!!!
                1. Boa kaa
                  Boa kaa 26 May 2018 20: 40
                  +2
                  Quote: Pollux
                  armed with destroyers such as Arly Burke - this is a preparatory subsonic anti-ship missile system "harpoon"

                  Well, it depends on how it is applied. If it falls out from a continuous flare at 20km from the side, it will not seem to anyone. But this is a matter of tactics and operational art.
                  The article is about the third series of Burks with new (30 TIME !!!) more sensitive radar TWO ... And the discussion has slipped into secondary issues. It is not right.
                  Correct, I think it will be to look at the increased capabilities of the missile defense / air defense system. In addition, 96 SAM SM-3, SM-6 !!! Surely the composition of weapons does not mean anything to you !?
                  Therefore, the 12 destroyers of the new, 3 series, will become the basis of a mobile naval missile defense system ... I don’t know, they can and can affect the level of protection from our state defense ... Time will tell.
                  IMHO.
                  1. -Pollux
                    -Pollux 26 May 2018 21: 53
                    +2
                    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                    The article is about the third series of Burks with new (30 TIME !!!) more sensitive radar TWO ... And the discussion has slipped into secondary issues. It is not right.

                    I will not argue for radar, the Americans are masters of exaggeration about thirty times that way. However, Arly-Berke military ships and its armament - this is the main question.
                    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                    Correct, I think it will be to look at the increased capabilities of the missile defense / air defense system. In addition, 96 SAM SM-3, SM-6 !!! Surely the composition of weapons does not mean anything to you !?

                    I do not mind, missile defense / air defense is a necessary and important thing, but how will they shoot at enemy ships? I consider it wrong to rank among the best warships that do not have offensive anti-ship weapons.
            2. Cherry Nine
              Cherry Nine 25 May 2018 14: 24
              0
              Quote: Pollux
              there’s simply nothing to attack enemy ships.

              Quote: Chertt
              AGM-158C LRASM missiles are not bad

              Pollux is a member of The Granite Fandom with Volcano. There is a religious question.
              1. -Pollux
                -Pollux 25 May 2018 16: 16
                +1
                Quote: Cherry Nine
                Pollux is a member of The Granite Fandom with Volcano. There is a religious question.

                Is the religious question a lack of a ship-based RCC in the US Navy? You have an interesting religion!
          2. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 26 May 2018 22: 26
            0
            "What a strange idea, change the universal launchers" ////

            There is already a new container MK57. It allows you to run both all existing and more
            large (long) missiles. New containers are mounted on three Zumvolts.
            1. Cherry Nine
              Cherry Nine 27 May 2018 07: 00
              0
              Quote: voyaka uh
              There is already a new container MK57

              1. Not a container, but a PU, it seems.
              2. There was information that the Americans recently paid extra for the adaptation of these cells for MK41 missiles.
        2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 25 May 2018 13: 48
          +2
          Quote: Pollux
          Look in the article about anti-ship weapons for this vessel - you will be pleasantly surprised.

          LRASM - pretty decent and good RCC. Intermeddle in MK41 without problems
          1. -Pollux
            -Pollux 25 May 2018 14: 03
            +1
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            LRASM - pretty decent and good RCC. Intermeddle in MK41 without problems

            Not decent enough and not good enough. Practice has shown that modern air defense systems are successfully fighting subsonic anti-ship missiles. Too many had to sacrifice in this rocket to fit it in MK41.
            1. Cherry Nine
              Cherry Nine 25 May 2018 16: 48
              0
              Quote: Pollux
              Is this the absence in the US Navy of normal ship-based anti-ship missiles?

              Your normal RCC is Mach 2.5 along a high path, special warhead is the 8 RIM-1957 Talos model.
              Quote: Pollux
              Practice has shown that modern air defense systems are successfully fighting subsonic anti-ship missiles.

              In more detail, what has practice shown there?
              1. -Pollux
                -Pollux 25 May 2018 16: 54
                +1
                Quote: Cherry Nine
                Your normal RCC is Mach 2.5 along a high path, special warhead is the 8 RIM-1957 Talos model.

                Firstly, she is yours.
                Secondly - this is an anti-aircraft missile, not the fact that it can shoot at "water". The combat range is 120 km, the warhead is 130 kg high-explosive fragmentation, that is, the actual explosive there from 20 kg. Even the harpoon beats on.
                And yes - they are not available.
            2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 25 May 2018 19: 04
              +1
              Quote: Pollux
              Not decent enough and not good enough. Practice has shown that modern air defense systems are successfully fighting subsonic anti-ship missiles.

              This is what RCC they successfully fought in practice? laughing
      4. igorka357
        igorka357 30 May 2018 11: 10
        0
        Zumwalt hasn’t gone anywhere! They’ll cut it and saw it, but when they finish it and put it into series, then we’ll see .. a lot of money from the Mrecatos .. they’re embarrassed .. But we only hope for strategic nuclear forces !!!
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 17 June 2018 15: 58
          0
          Zamvoltov (yes, through "a" correctly) will be like 3 pieces. Large-scale production was canceled in favor of the new Burks.
  2. san4es
    san4es 25 May 2018 09: 16
    +3
    hi In the superstructure of the USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG-125), the phased antenna arrays of the promising AN / SPY-6 radar will be mounted.
    The main difference between ships of the DDG 51 Flight III type and previous versions of the DDG 51 series destroyers will be the replacement of the AN / SPY-1 radar complex of the AEGIS multifunctional weapon system with the new AMDR-S (Air and Missile Defense Radar S-band) radar complex with advanced AFAR in solving missile defense tasks, which will allow ships to implement, according to American terminology, "integrated air defense and missile defense"
    The AN / SPY-6 radar is built taking into account the IAMD (Integrated Air and Missile Defense) concept and is capable of working with air defense or missile defense systems.
    Weapon variant of the submarine Flight III destroyer. Two Mk 41 UVP modules (48 cells in the bow and 80 in the stern), which contain 88 SM-3 and SM-6 missiles, 32 ESSM missiles (4 missiles in 8 cells), 24 Tomahawk TLAM, 8 cruise missiles PLURO ASROC. In addition, the ship carries one 155-mm AGS AU, 2x21 air defense systems of the near-boundary RAM, two 25-mm AU Mk 38 Mod 2, eight 12,7 mm machine guns, four 324 mm three-pipe torpedo tubes Mk 32 and two SH-60B helicopters Seahawk. As part of long-term contracts, orders were issued for the first three destroyers of the DDG 51 Flight III type (from DDG 124 to DDG 126), and their further construction is planned (according to current plans for military shipbuilding - up to 22 units by 2030). hi
  3. Magic archer
    Magic archer 25 May 2018 09: 34
    0
    I hope that someday we will have a series of destroyers ... Otherwise, the Leader is only on paper and for some reason with a nuclear power plant. Such ships are unlikely to be mass-built. crying
    1. Soho
      Soho 25 May 2018 11: 12
      +2
      because ours all the time there is an irrepressible urge to shock all the next megavundrvafly in the future, instead of creating an economical and modern right now.
  4. Narak-zempo
    Narak-zempo 25 May 2018 11: 59
    0
    He tried to throw one of them, and covered the second with himself. Fortunately, only the thrown grenade exploded.

    Confused grenades mattress cover.
    1. Cherry Nine
      Cherry Nine 25 May 2018 14: 40
      +6
      Quote: Narak-zempo
      Confused grenades mattress cover.

      You were sorely missed in '45. Would show as it should.
      Grandfather, by the way, lived to 80. Well done.
    2. igorka357
      igorka357 30 May 2018 11: 12
      +1
      Do you think heroes are only with us? They also have heroes, and a lot! Underestimation of the enemy, this is one hundred percent death on the battlefield, within five to ten minutes !!!
  5. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 25 May 2018 12: 43
    +2
    3rd Burke PU will have 128 cells, 80 feed and 32 on the tank
    1. mult-65
      mult-65 28 May 2018 22: 09
      0
      80+32=112 wink But 80 + 48 = desired128.
  6. arkadiyssk
    arkadiyssk 25 May 2018 14: 22
    +2
    Quote: Chertt
    Destroyers Arleigh Burke Flight III. Construction has begun

    Very sorry. It was hoped that all striped money would swell into the non-floating and non-shooting project "Zumwalt".

    So these are different ships - Arly Berki is air defense, and Zumwalt is for working on other ships and the coast, to replace Iowa.
  7. Scharnhorst
    Scharnhorst 26 May 2018 09: 23
    +3
    The project of the ship itself is certainly good, and this is exactly the ship that the American Navy needs (really). And what really “shocks” is “increasing the radar sensitivity by 30 times” ?! Well, advertisers, as you know, have a language without bones - a specialist does not like to retype it. Or reveal the implied more accessible to the general public.
  8. Vlad ohio
    Vlad ohio 29 May 2018 02: 39
    0
    Quote: Chertt
    The AGM-158C LRASM missiles are not bad (just under the MK-41.) Yes, and the anti-ship Tomahawks are also quite serious weapons. This is from what is in service

    Pkr tomogawks have been gone for many years, only harpoons but 2 to 4 glasses are not here.
    Can come up with?
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 17 June 2018 15: 56
      0
      So come up with it already. I don’t remember how to call a fool, but a subsonic anti-ship missile in stealth performance, with a powerful warhead and a range of a thousand kilometers.
  9. ple
    ple 31 May 2018 19: 26
    +1
    the volume of construction is impressive .... and we all (the mosquito fleet) are riveting ...
  10. Nemchinov Vl
    Nemchinov Vl 3 June 2018 19: 56
    0
    I think that if the RF Ministry of Defense finds the possibility of building a series of ships for the Navy, project 11560 (in the version with 24 VPU for Caliber / Onyx / Zircon, and Fort-M air defense systems, moreover, it is advisable to adapt the principles of the Barrier radar system to it) with AFAR, for a review of 360 degrees.) in the amount of at least 1 unit, for each of 3-4 units. under construction "Arly Berkov" then the alignment of forces "at sea" will begin to level out ...
  11. Wiruz
    Wiruz 17 June 2018 15: 54
    0
    On the first Berks, TA and anti-aircraft artillery were. Then they were removed from subsequent ships as unnecessary. Now they returned ...
    Oh and strange you are, American logic