Military Review

Kazakh armored vehicle armed with a Russian combat module

32
The Kazakh armored personnel carrier Barys 6x6 received a combat module from the BTR-82A. The new version of the armored car is presented at the international exhibition KADEX-2018, currently taking place in the capital of Kazakhstan - Astana.


Kazakh armored vehicle armed with a Russian combat module


It should be noted that a large number of Russian BTR-82А are in service with the country, and by installing the combat module on Barys, Kazakhstan’s gunsmiths achieve unification with Russian armored vehicles. The module is armed with 30-2 automatic gun and 72-mm PKTM machine gun stabilized in two planes.

The Barys 6X6 is a variant of the Mbombe South African armored personnel carrier with enhanced mine protection, providing protection against landmines, improvised explosive devices and side explosions, as well as, according to the developers, RPG shots with non-dandem warheads.

It can be configured as an armored personnel carrier or as a highly efficient infantry fighting vehicle, armed with a large-caliber machine gun, automatic grenade launcher or automatic gun / remote-controlled turret, and it is possible to install an 120-mm mortar.

The weight of the armored vehicle reaches 22 500 kg. Engine power 450 HP allows you to reach a maximum speed of 110 km / h. Power reserve - 1000 km. Capacity - 11 people. The machine is able to accommodate the driver, commander, weapon operator and 8 fully equipped infantrymen (with weapons, ammunition and necessary equipment).
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/o_gilvi
32 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 24 May 2018 11: 31
    +1
    “Bahchu” they had to put on this semi-tank.
    1. cordon332
      cordon332 25 May 2018 09: 17
      +2
      Quote: ANCIENT
      “Bahchu” they had to put on this semi-tank.

      Bahchu will not pull in weight and size.
  2. jjj
    jjj 24 May 2018 11: 33
    +2
    Kazakhs are like Chinese. They borrowed one thing, here - another
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 24 May 2018 11: 39
      +2
      The Chinese have given certain results. wink Let's see what happens with the Kazakhs.
  3. Gronsky
    Gronsky 24 May 2018 12: 13
    +1
    Quote: jjj
    They borrowed one thing, here - another

    And this is the right approach. They collect all the best and integrate into one complex. They get a worthy product, raise their own engineers, develop industry - all around are pluses. Kazakhs are great. That's just with the Latinization of the alphabet somehow adjusted.
    1. _Sergei_
      _Sergei_ 25 May 2018 09: 28
      0
      Maybe Kazakhs and well done, but Kazakhs are unlikely to work in working professions. How many Kazakhs traveled to the factories of Kazakhstan or in the department by some or security guards.
      1. Togrul
        Togrul 25 May 2018 10: 51
        +1
        Most of the working class in Kazakhstan are Kazakhs.
        1. _Sergei_
          _Sergei_ 25 May 2018 13: 23
          0
          I have never seen a working Kazakh on working specialties in mechanical engineering.
          1. Togrul
            Togrul 25 May 2018 14: 28
            +1
            https://informburo.kz/stati/kak-v-kazahstane-remo
            ntiruyut-bronetechniku-fotoreportazh.html

            Not a single Kazakh? laughing
            1. _Sergei_
              _Sergei_ 25 May 2018 20: 13
              0
              Page not found tongue
              1. Togrul
                Togrul 26 May 2018 09: 03
                +1
                The site spoils the links you need to copy and then paste everything into the address bar and open from there.

                Russians cannot even follow the link on their own, but they say that Kazakhs do not know how to work in mechanical engineering. tongue tongue
                1. _Sergei_
                  _Sergei_ 26 May 2018 10: 30
                  +1
                  I understand that it’s a shame for the Kazakhs, but I did so. Page not found
                  1. Togrul
                    Togrul 26 May 2018 11: 58
                    +1
                    I understand that you should be offended by your curvature, but how can I not be able to follow the link I don’t understand.
                    Well, just google “How armored vehicles are being repaired in Kazakhstan. Photo report” on Google and the article you need will come out on the first link.
                    1. _Sergei_
                      _Sergei_ 26 May 2018 12: 41
                      +1
                      JSC "Semey Engineering" is a former branch of the Rubtsovsky Engineering Plant. Now a branch of UVZ. So I lifted him from his knees when he was just starting to be built in Semipalatinsk around 1977. Then he was called there a tank factory, although he produced rollers on the GTT. Then they passed the GTT from us. Now he is just a repair company. And the Kazakhs were put on a car to show that the Kazakhs are involved in the repair. Give them there, bring it up, etc. So do not be offended, but I know this enterprise.
                      1. Togrul
                        Togrul 26 May 2018 14: 15
                        +1
                        Quote: _Sergey_
                        And the Kazakhs were put on a car to show that the Kazakhs are involved in the repair. Give them there, bring it up, etc. So do not be offended, but I know this enterprise.



                        Do not be offended, but you are not even able to follow the link on the Internet, which does not speak in favor of your mental abilities. Plus traditional racism. Well, which one of you is a factory lift from your knees? laughing
                2. badens1111
                  badens1111 26 May 2018 10: 44
                  +1
                  Quote: Togrul
                  Russians cannot even follow the link on their own, but they say that Kazakhs do not know how to work in mechanical engineering.

                  Actually, it is thanks to the Russians that the Kazakhs have no mechanical engineering, and not just flocks of sheep and herds of camels ... So you should not stick out your national ..
                  About 88% of migrants from Kazakhstan go to permanent residence in Russia. Most of them are Russians, but there are also Kazakhs. The number of Kazakhs who left has been replenished by Kazakhs moving from Uzbekistan.

                  Most of the Kazakhstanis who left for Russia in 2016 are Russians. Their number totals 23 589 people. These data are provided by the Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on statistics. The number of Ukrainians who left was 2 252 people, Germans - 2 915 people, and Tatars - 843 people.
                  Who are being replaced, clearly by reference .. will this please you?
                  https://365info.kz/2017/03/migratsionnaya-bomba-k
                  azahstana-rossiya-vyigryvaet-ot-nashih-problem /
                  1. Togrul
                    Togrul 26 May 2018 12: 01
                    +1
                    Quote: badens1111
                    Actually, it is thanks to the Russians that the Kazakhs have no mechanical engineering, and not just flocks of sheep and herds of camels ... So you should not stick out your national ..


                    Just an answer to Sergey’s attack. I do not like? Then watch the speech. And do not forget that you have your own mechanical engineering thanks to the Americans. Remind the history of Soviet industrialization?

                    Quote: badens1111
                    Who are being replaced, clearly by reference .. will this please you?


                    Sergey will not be able to open this link again laughing
                    Migration from the country as a whole cannot please. But what to do. Deny check out?
                    1. badens1111
                      badens1111 26 May 2018 12: 17
                      +1
                      Quote: Togrul
                      Quote: badens1111
                      Actually, it is thanks to the Russians that the Kazakhs have no mechanical engineering, and not just flocks of sheep and herds of camels ... So you should not stick out your national ..


                      Just an answer to Sergey’s attack. I do not like? Then watch the speech. And do not forget that you have your own mechanical engineering thanks to the Americans. Remind the history of Soviet industrialization?

                      Quote: badens1111
                      Who are being replaced, clearly by reference .. will this please you?


                      Sergey will not be able to open this link again laughing
                      Migration from the country as a whole cannot please. But what to do. Deny check out?

                      Remind me that I’ll laugh a lot. I’ll remind you that wheel inventions are only once and for all completely marginalized liberals who are mad about worshiping the West .. And if you’ve already completed turnkey projects, then a competent manager will take advantage of this circumstance. Then he will train his staff , and he will adjust his industry to the needs of his country. Will you challenge? Or will there again be a bagpipe and a boring song, supposedly Stalin did the wrong thing?
                      So, all the same, migration doesn’t please you, well, and why does migration exist and are not mediocre at all, namely those who have the right place to be in engineering and workers in production?
                      Lunge is not a lunge, but it sounds a little ugly so to speak. Why?
                      Quote: Togrul
                      But what to do. Deny check out?

                      Likely to create such conditions that it would be much more comfortable inside the country than outside it. By the way, this is a trouble not only for you, but for Russia, unfortunately.
                      1. Togrul
                        Togrul 26 May 2018 12: 41
                        +1
                        Quote: badens1111
                        Remind me that I’ll laugh a lot. I’ll remind you that wheel inventions are only once and for all completely marginalized liberals who are mad about worshiping the West .. And if you’ve already completed turnkey projects, then a competent manager will take advantage of this circumstance. Then he will train his staff , and he will adjust his industry to the needs of his country. Will you challenge? Or will there again be a bagpipe and a boring song, supposedly Stalin did the wrong thing?


                        No, it will simply be the fact that the entire Stalinist industrialization was carried out by American and German engineers and their technologies .. As for worshiping the West, I myself despise such people. As well as bowing to you or just stupid nationalists.


                        Quote: badens1111
                        Lunge is not a lunge, but it sounds a little ugly so to speak. Why?


                        What is hi, is that the answer, no? In addition, on my part, there was only irony at Sergei's address.

                        Quote: badens1111
                        Likely to create such conditions that it would be much more comfortable inside the country than outside it. By the way, this is a trouble not only for you, but for Russia, unfortunately.


                        Well, that is a given. It’s time to change the power for a long time. But it is you who defends our sun-faced one.
                      2. badens1111
                        badens1111 26 May 2018 14: 38
                        0
                        Quote: Togrul (Togrul)
                        No, it will simply be the fact that the entire Stalinist industrialization was carried out by American and German engineers and their technologies .. As for worshiping the West, I myself despise such people. As well as bowing to you or just stupid nationalists.

                        Is this all right? And before that, in Russia there was not a single factory, factory ... um, but what was in the bare steppe, on the site of then-nonexistent Kazakhstan, all the same flocks of sheep and herds of camels?
                        So who is here
                        Quote: Togrul (Togrul)
                        As well as bowing to you or just stupid nationalists.

                        Second, why, pragmatically, not use the moment of crisis in the West and take from there what the country needs? This is so not desirable for you, but not the USSR of that time.
                        Quote: Togrul (Togrul)
                        But it is you who defends our sun-faced one.

                        Oh .. how did you choose, he is your President, but are we again to blame ??
                        You definitely didn’t confuse anything?
                        Or should you have some kind of expat in the Presidents like the Baltic states, preferably with training in the State Department and the CIA and in Kazakhstan immediately and everywhere. Will the doubtful happiness of notorious nationalists, Russophobes and simply not very smart people come?
                        You, as I understand it, are a new gradation of Kazakhs that you are sure that you actually need someone in Eurasia, except Russia?
                        Do you know ... in this case, as there was no such thing as Kazakhstan, both the state and you, about 100 years ago, you risk losing again what you, whether you want it or not, was given by the Russians so hated by you.
                        The hopes of all those who see Russia as opponents leads to such a plague, as for those who think about the way you, in the once flourishing Ukraine, which has now become Ruin Territory 404, under the complete control of an uncle from behind a puddle.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. badens1111
                        badens1111 27 May 2018 12: 01
                        0
                        [quote = ardatyran (Arda)] And you all hate the Kazakhs [/ quote]
                        Sir, why are you so excited and lying straight?
                        Did Russia “fall apart”? Well ... well, from the point of view of every Russophobe, it looks like this, and from the point of view of Historians, every attempt to “collapse” of Russia ends in defeat for you. [Ardatyran (Arda)] What did you have before Peter I ? All the same herds of pigs, but lackeys in bast shoes ?! As for the Kazakhs, at least they were not slaves, in other words serfs in their native land. [/ Quote]
                        Sir ... teach History, and not the tales of the "steppe 2 feikolmets of our time. Not Russia crawled on her knees first to Anna, and then to Catherine 2, but the leaders of the Kazakhs fleeing the Dzungars.
                        "In 1726, the khan of the Younger Zhuz Abulkhair, the elders Sugur, Edikbai, Hadzhibay, Kulimbay and others sent Ambassador Koybagar to Russia to" ask for patronage "for the Kazakhs of the Younger Zhuz. This embassy remained fruitless, but Abulkhair did not abandon its intentions in September 1730 again sent the embassy through Ufa to Petersburg with a letter to the Russian Empress Anna Ioannovna and an oral request for citizenship and patronage.On February 19, 1731, the Empress Anna Ioannovna signed a letter of appreciation to Khan Abulkhair on accepting Ml into Russian citizenship hell zhuz. "

                        Source: http://e-history.kz/ru/contents/view/1498
                        © e-history.kz
                        Teach History. The source is by no means Russian, but yours, Kazakh, to see those who wrote it, how much more literate you are in the historical question. To be anti-Russian in form and pro-Western in content, going nowhere, dancing to the slyness of the West is fun, the consequences are difficult.
                        And do not slip into narrow-minded Kazakh nationalism, behind which everything is exactly the same as in the country 404.
                        The objective view of scientists, here
                        https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?
                        id = 11500
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 24 May 2018 12: 14
    +2
    The main thing is that military-technical cooperation with Russia is visible. It would be worse if, in the light of recent events, they began to interbreed with some American module.
  5. andrewkor
    andrewkor 24 May 2018 12: 19
    0
    Was the typewriter named in honor of Billy Mbombene, the hero of Oleg Divov’s works? Something is also connected there with the typewriters.
  6. Graz
    Graz 24 May 2018 12: 24
    0
    with a 30mm gun it’s already a BMP, and not an armored troop-carrier at 22.5 tons of weight; protection there should be not bad
    1. ioan-e
      ioan-e 24 May 2018 12: 26
      0
      Quote: Graz
      at 22.5 tons of weight there protection should not be bad

      And there is only good ground pressure! laughing
  7. seos
    seos 24 May 2018 12: 25
    +1
    “and also, according to the developers, the RPG rounds with a non-tandem warhead” are clearly false ... the armor is thin, thick semi-active defense is needed to protect against RPGs, which occupies a fairly large volume ...
    1. Graz
      Graz 24 May 2018 13: 35
      0
      Well, the volume does not mean weight, the damping armor against the RPG and the BMP-4 was experimentally set, there are all kinds of fillers apparently
      1. seos
        seos 24 May 2018 15: 17
        +1
        On BMP-3 was placed DZ Research Institute of Steel for lightly armored vehicles ... this is DZ with explosives and the thickness of the modules was decent ... oklo 500 - 600 mm
  8. brr1
    brr1 24 May 2018 16: 45
    0
    Without anti-tank systems, this module from the BTR will not do BMP in any way.
  9. _Sergei_
    _Sergei_ 26 May 2018 14: 43
    +1
    Togrul,
    I have been with computers since 1987, when the first personal computer occupied the floor of the room. So it’s not for you to teach me how to handle it. And you don’t need to be offended by the truth.
    1. Togrul
      Togrul 26 May 2018 17: 31
      +1
      Maybe it was worth learning how to follow links in 30 years? You, too, do not be offended, my friend.
  10. Togrul
    Togrul 26 May 2018 17: 30
    +1
    Quote: badens1111
    Is this all right? And before that, in Russia there was not a single factory, factory ... um, but what was in the bare steppe, on the site of then-nonexistent Kazakhstan, all the same flocks of sheep and herds of camels?


    Modern (that era) industry is the merit of the Americans. What about Kazakhstan? You answered your question. Same. Factories and factories, built under the guidance of American and German engineers, using Western technology.
    Herds of camels and flocks of sheep, too. There were also mines and factories for the extraction of coal and ore. With Russian engineers and Kazakh workers.

    Quote: badens1111
    Second, why, pragmatically, not use the moment of crisis in the West and take from there what the country needs? This is so not desirable for you, but not the USSR of that time.


    I agree. There is nothing wrong with that. It’s bad when they don’t remember that.

    Quote: badens1111
    Oh .. how did you choose, he is your President, but are we again to blame ??
    You definitely didn’t confuse anything?
    Or should you have some kind of expat in the Presidents like the Baltic states, preferably with training in the State Department and the CIA and in Kazakhstan immediately and everywhere. Will the doubtful happiness of notorious nationalists, Russophobes and simply not very smart people come?


    That is, you do not like Nazarbayev, but you will not like the other president either. You will not please, older brothers. laughing

    Quote: badens1111
    You, as I understand it, are a new gradation of Kazakhs that you are sure that you actually need someone in Eurasia, except Russia?
    Do you know ... in this case, as there was no such thing as Kazakhstan, both the state and you, about 100 years ago, you risk losing again what you, whether you want it or not, was given by the Russians so hated by you.
    The hopes of all those who see Russia as opponents leads to such a plague, as for those who think about the way you, in the once flourishing Ukraine, which has now become Ruin Territory 404, under the complete control of an uncle from behind a puddle.


    You are either a stupid person or a scoundrel since you ascribe to me hatred of the Russians.