Rifles by countries and continents. Rifles heirs of the Vikings. Continued (part of 15)

36
When about a year ago the materials of the series “Rifles across countries and continents” appeared on the pages of VO, this was essentially due to a completely prosaic circumstance. I just have a friend who collects them. And he has no rifles in his collection, including even Mauser carbines made in Sweden and Spain. And naturally all the materials of the cycle at that time “danced from the stove,” that is, from what he had in his collection was available. He had a Remington rifle — he wrote about her, there was a Portuguese rifle “Steyr” —the story about this rifle followed. That's why and story about the rifles of Norway was launched with a rifle, which was at my hands, that is, with a rifle "Krag-Jorgensen." But what happened to her, what rifles in this “Viking country”, and they once lived in Norway in the same way as in neighboring Sweden, armed her troops until the epoch of this famous model, which was also United States Army!


Gevär fm1881 - Yarman system magazine rifle (Army Museum, Stockholm)



And before the "gait", the Norwegian army fired a rifle from the Yarman system of the 1884 model of the year, developed back in 1878. "Yarman" - this is the first rifle with a rotary sliding bolt, adopted in service in Norway and, moreover, its own development. Prior to this, the weapons of the Norwegian army were quite variegated. Wetterly, Winchester, Hotchkiss rifles and early models of Remington Lee were used. Even the German Mauser M71 / 84 rifles and early samples of Kropachek rifles and those got here, on the rocky, rugged fjords of the northern coast of Europe.


Yarman rifle with one of the bayonet samples.

In fact, armed with all these variegated weapons the Norwegian army at that time was something like a militia - a position intolerable for any self-respecting country. But it just so happened that the Norwegian engineer Jacob Smith Yarman understood this before everyone else, who designed his rifle, first for cartridges with black powder, and then for cartridges with smokeless ones. And his rifles were made not only for the Norwegian army, but also for neighboring Sweden. First of all, Yarman prepared a rifle of the 1884 model of the year for cartridges with black powder of the 10,15 mm caliber and with an eight-charge tubular magazine, which was located under the barrel, by analogy with the Winchester magazine. And at first a single-shot rifle entered service. The Norwegian military considered, however, this was not only the opinion of the Norwegian military, that if a rifle makes 15 shots per minute, then there will not be enough ammunition for it!


Yarman rifle device.

However, Yarman began not with a rifle, but from a cartridge. Any rifle is primarily a cartridge. So to his rifle, Yarman at the end of 1870-x and the beginning of 1880-s first developed a cartridge, which was approved by the joint Swedish-Norwegian commission in 1881, and then in 1884, it was put into service with a rifle.

Rifles by countries and continents. Rifles heirs of the Vikings. Continued (part of 15)

A cartridge and a bullet to the Yarman rifle.

Had a brass sleeve bottle with a prominent flange and capsule socket under the central battle cap. Black powder with a weight of 4,5 was used as a propellant. The sleeve also contained (traditional for cartridges of those years) a prodelnik of two cardboard circles, between which there was a mixture of fat and wax. He needed to lubricate the barrel of a rifle when fired and thereby reduce the leavening of the barrel. The bullet was a lead, blunt-shaped and with a groove in the bottom. As in the cartridge of the rifle Berdan, the bullet had a paper wrapper, which also reduced the leadening of the barrel. The mass of the bullet was 21,85 g, and when fired, it gained speed up to 500 m / s. When the cartridge was modernized, a bullet with a steel shell was adapted to it, and black powder was replaced with a ballistite, which informed it all the same speed in 500 m / s and energy 2350 J.

Yarman patron was in service for only seven years, after which they began to use the 6,5х55 cartridge for the “Swedish Mauser”. However, the supply of ammunition for nothing was not lost. A part was adapted for harpoon guns, and a part was sold as a hunting one. Now this cartridge is no longer available.


The bolt to the Yarman rifle.

The rifle had a simple straight-grip bolt in its rear end, and when reloading it turned up 45 degrees. The ejector was located on the top of the gate and was a simple springy metal plate. Weight - 4,5 kg.


Shutter device to the rifle Yarman.

The rifle was tested by a joint Norwegian-Swedish commission, and, as they say, it "seemed" to her. But since by this time quite a lot of magazine rifles had already appeared, it was expressed the wish to turn it into a “shop”. It was prepared several prototypes of rifles that had stores. Ole Hermann Johannes Krag - the creator of the Crag-Petersen rifle and the future creator of the Krag-Jørgensen rifle - developed two versions of the magazine for the Yarman rifle, one of which was almost identical to the one he later used on his future Crag-rifle Jorgensen. Jacob Yarman himself also made several variants of rifles, mainly with tubular magazines under the barrel or with removable magazines mounted on the side above the bolt. The latter was considered unsuitable by the military for use in military weapons, and in the end they chose a tubular store. By design, it was similar to the Kropachek rifle tubular store and, perhaps, served as its prototype, although it may well be that the “Krag-Petersen” rifle served as a “source of inspiration” for the designer.


From top to bottom: Krag-Jorgensen M1894 (civilian model with a telescopic sight), Krag-Petersen, Yarman M1884, Remington M1867 (Fram Museum, Oslo)

It should be noted here that no matter how perfect this design may be, it had one very serious and unavoidable drawback, typical of all rifles of this type. The combination of a tubular store and ammunition with a “central combat” capsule was too dangerous, especially when using cartridges with pointed bullets. In addition, the balance of weapons with each shot changed, which to some extent reflected on the accuracy of shooting.


Yarman rifle bolt handle.


The shutter handle of the carbine model 1886 g.

In addition, the rifle was also a very powerful bayonet weapon, because it had a straight neck of the box, convenient for a bayonet battle. The bayonet was very long and was a real T-shaped sword blade, similar to the bayonet from Gra's rifle, but only without a hook on the crosshair.


Aim.

The sight was calibrated from 200 to 1600 m. It was noted that the Yarman rifle was a remarkably accurate rifle for its time. In 1886, the combined Norwegian-Swedish commission, which chose it earlier, prepared a list of all rifles tested. And judging by this list, it is clear that the Yarman M1884 was significantly better than the other rifles tested. So it turned out that "Yarman" with its 10,15 mm bullet at a distance of 438 meters had the best accuracy among all the others. By this, he was very different from the Remington M1867, and also the Gra rifles. Even the Mauser rifle (presumably it was a Gewehr 1871) had a slightly worse accuracy rate.


It was on the Yarman rifle that the rather funny U-shaped shop of the Ludwig Lieove system was tested, arr. 1880, which was supposed to turn it into a shop with a minimum amount of rework, with better balancing compared to rifles with a barrel gantry. (Museum of Defense, Oslo)


The magazine was mounted on the bottom of the box, and the cartridges were fed by a spring through the hole on the right directly into the receiver when the shutter was moving. But ... the design was unsuccessful! (Museum of Defense, Oslo)

In total, at least 30 Yarman rifles were manufactured for the Norwegian army during the ten years between its adoption in 000 and the subsequent adoption of the Krag-Jorgensen rifle in 1884. Another 1894 were made at the same time for Swedish fleet. In the Norwegian army, she replaced the Remington M1867 rifle, and even then, when they replaced it with a more advanced rifle, they kept a part in warehouses. In 1905, when the threat of war between Norway and Sweden arose, these rifles were handed out to reserve soldiers. In the 1920s and 1930s, a number of rifles were either sold on the civilian market or converted into M28 harpoon guns. From the mid-1920s until the German invasion of Norway, civilians could buy rifles about a quarter of what a brand new Krag-Jorgensen would cost them. The price, as you can see, was quite reasonable, but they sold a little rifles. Then the idea arose to sell these guns and ammunition abroad. In 1929, about 5000 rifles were sold to some German company, but their fate was unknown. In 1936, King Ibn Saud from Saudi Arabia initiated negotiations on the purchase of 20 Yarman rifles with ammunition for his police, but the Norwegian parliament prevented the sale, arguing that the sale of such an outdated type of weapon would adversely affect the image of Norway.


Right view. (Museum of Defense, Oslo)

Here is what is written about this store in the book V.E. Markevich “Handguns” (Polygon, 1994. С.422) “Store in the form of a flat box along the length of the cartridge; he covers the gun from the bottom and from the sides in a semicircle. The left side of the store is closed, the right one is open and equipped with a special feeder (distributor). The box has a zigzag plate spring feeding the cartridges. The magazine fits 11 cartridges, the 12 is inserted into the barrel. You can fill the store in 15-20 seconds. You can make 12 shots in 24-35 seconds. Outside the store there is a button for retracting and locking the supply spring when loading, or when it is necessary to eliminate any delay. Shop weight - 380 grams.

The Liove shop had the same inconvenient shape as the former Tenner Russian store. The difference between the one and the other store was only in the details of the device, for example, at Tenner the feeding spring from the wire, from Liova from the plate, a slightly different distributor, and so on. In addition to the bulkiness and weight gain of the rifle, the Lio shop also required reworking the bolt grip, which was also expensive, so the store was rejected. ”


Left view. (Museum of Defense, Oslo)

In 1938, a private investor - Trygve G. Hygen, a former captain of the Norwegian army, caused a real international scandal, offering to sell Yarman rifles to Ceylon. The British Consulate General complained to the Norwegian government, pointing out that Ceylon is a British possession, so privately selling arms to this island is out of the question. The government of Norway declared “reprimand” to Hygen, after which he withdrew his proposal. He also offered to sell these rifles to Lithuania, Cuba, Nicaragua, and Bulgaria, as well as to Italy and the Netherlands, but all these attempts ended in nothing. It is believed that during the German occupation of Norway, the Germans destroyed the Yarman 21 000 rifles, as they were only fit for partisans.

To be continued ...
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    1 June 2018 15: 40

    M28 Jarmann harpoon rifle was produced by Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk from 1928 to 1952. About 1911 units were produced. At the rifle Jarmann M1884 the store was dismantled, the barrel was shortened. The stock was equipped with a butt plate. Firing Range - 300 m.
    1. +4
      1 June 2018 15: 43
      Here's what a fellow you are - unearthed!
      1. +2
        1 June 2018 21: 32
        Here, Vyacheslav Olegovich, the problem is not to unearth, but to find. Already a hundred times I promised myself to restore order in the library, to compile a catalog ... But things are still ...
        1. +1
          1 June 2018 22: 17
          The same problem !!!
    2. +4
      1 June 2018 15: 52
      "It is believed that during the German occupation of Norway, the Germans destroyed 21 Yarman rifles, since they were only suitable for partisans."
      Well-known Norwegian weapons collector Trond Wickborg claims to have seen a photo where German soldiers gasoline a stack of Yarman rifles about 50 m long and 2 m high. But he doesn’t have the photo himself.
  2. +2
    1 June 2018 15: 53
    But it just so happened that the Norwegian engineer Jacob Smith Yarman understood this before everyone else, who designed his rifle first under cartridges with smoke powder, and then under cartridges with smokeless. Moreover, his rifles were made not only for the Norwegian army, but also for neighboring Sweden.

    Vyacheslav Olegovich, do you not know: “The Kiel Treaty was signed in 1814. It decided the following:“ Norway must belong to the king of Sweden and make up the kingdom united with Sweden, and the new king is obligated to govern Norway as an independent state. ” Therefore, the production of weapons was common and other projects. And only in 1905, Norway became independent.
    1. +3
      1 June 2018 16: 56
      He decided the following: "Norway must belong to the king of Sweden and make up the kingdom united with Sweden, and the new king is obligated to rule Norway as an independent state."

      lucky the Swedes with Bernadotte ... what By the way, the clearest example is not only that the "social elevator" is also a well-deserved reward! hi
      1. +3
        1 June 2018 23: 10
        Quote: Mikado
        the Swedes and Bernadotte were lucky ... what, by the way, is the clearest example of not only the “social elevator”, but also a well-deserved reward!

        His tattoo is particularly striking: "In March 1844, the highest dignitaries of Sweden, who were present during the preparation for the burial of the body of King Charles XIV Johan, simply became foolish when they saw the phrase tattooed on his body:" Death to the Kings. "The fact is that in childhood the king grew up under named Jean Baptiste Bernadotte in the family of a French artisan.
        Source: http://i-fakt.ru
        1. +1
          2 June 2018 11: 46
          maybe the tattoo was of a different content, but, in any case, anti-monarchical. wink These are the zigzags of fate! It’s only worth it ... to act humanly with the Swedish prisoners in due time! soldier
    2. +3
      1 June 2018 17: 44
      Nikolay! Before me was an English text. I looked at him stupidly and translated almost verbatim, especially since there was nothing "such" that would require straining the brain in it. Well, that’s how it happened. In principle, in my opinion it is readable and there is no particular distortion of history in this phrase.
      1. +3
        1 June 2018 23: 03
        Quote: kalibr
        In principle, in my opinion it is readable and there is no particular distortion of history in this phrase.

        Vyacheslav Olegovich. There are no complaints about the technical part of the article. Everything is interesting. It was just necessary to mention the union of Sweden and Norway, and then it would become clear why many projects in Sweden and Norway were unified. This applies not only to small arms. Thanks article, interesting.
        1. +2
          2 June 2018 07: 07
          Yes indeed. Something never crossed my mind. I don’t know why.
  3. +1
    1 June 2018 16: 14
    All this is curious, but it’s much more interesting to read about systems that turned out to be outstanding and lasted longer than 50 years. I would like to turn to the author with a proposal, to conduct a comparative analysis (with shooting, of course) of the sniper options Mauser 98K and Mosinki. From history, we know that the Soviet sniper school won in the war. But the weapon itself played far from the last role. Moreover, some German and Finnish snipers also “stuffed” their accounts from the three-ruler.
    It is advisable to check the following indicators: The multiplicity of the optics used in the optics grid, the ease of use of optics, the ability to charge a rifle with optics clip, the rate of aimed fire through optics (for example, at 100 meters, the number of hits and the total number of shots), the flash value, when shooting in daylight and dark (it is better to check with mortar fire, when the evaluator moves away from the shooter at 100, 200 and 300 meters, and the shooter “shoots” into the air) which rifle raises dust more when shooting f from a lying position (you can use flour simulating the dust of destroyed buildings), vibrations and demolition of light objects, under the influence of gases escaping from the trunk (small pebbles, pieces of paper, grass, etc.), the amount of bluish smoke and its visibility at different distances .
    Thanks to such work (which has not yet been carried out by anyone, I note), we get an approximately objective assessment of success and miscalculations, of a particular design. I suppose that a very interesting contest should turn out. Yours faithfully!
    1. +4
      1 June 2018 17: 40
      Dear Alexey! None of this will come of it. Personally, I don’t have any weapons at home. Nothing. My friend has all the rifles "immobilized", that is, you cannot shoot from them. There are these rifles in the museum of our Artillery Institute (formerly called PVAIU, but renamed all the time). Although I don’t know about the sniper version of the 98K. And I can even get there. But ... VERY VERY REASONS will be needed for which they will allow me to do all this. You would know why I should get information on the commands given when firing from the 1903 gun of the year. And then ... rifles, cartridges, a shooting range. By God, it’s easier for me to write to the American Rifle Association and ask them to do this, rather than trying to do it myself. And the last ... the eyes fail. Not with my modern eyes, alas, "sniping." But the idea is interesting, but think about it ...
      1. 0
        2 June 2018 10: 14
        Vyacheslav! It is a pity, of course, that such a test cannot be done in Russia, where two outstanding weapon systems collided. At that time, they were already considered obsolete and planned to be replaced by semiautomatic devices. But the rest is not important who will make the comparison. The main thing is to withstand a certain framework of the competition in order to draw objective conclusions, devoid of any speculation and bias.
    2. +3
      1 June 2018 18: 21
      And what shall we compare with? The Mosin sniper rifle was equipped with at least five types of sights.
      The Mauser can also be with a Zielfemrohr 1939 scope, it can be with Zielfernrohr 41, 42, ZF 4, but it can also be found with Pecar-Berlin. To get objective results, you need to compare all of them.
      Can you collect all the samples (moreover, for objective comparison, they should be in a comparable state)? Well, the corresponding number of rounds.
      1. +1
        1 June 2018 18: 56
        If you check all the sights that were used during that period (with rifles, of course), it would be great in general. And then you can also add shooting with optics at night, through different sights, for accuracy (100, 200 and 300 meters are enough). And it is also known that 98K Mausers produced precision cartridges. Nevertheless, the Soviet sniper school prevailed. It is important to note that Soviet snipers did not "switch" to German rifles, with the specified target cartridges. And successfully beat, that’s the trick.
        1. +1
          1 June 2018 19: 22
          About German target cartridges - where is this from?
          1. +1
            1 June 2018 19: 56
            In general, I heard about the weapon in a Russian program. There’s such a chubby host. And after another article on the Internet came across, about cartridges. And they wrote that a limited series of cartridges of improved combat was produced, specifically for Wehrmacht snipers. Release dates for 1942-45 More precisely I will not prompt.
            1. +3
              1 June 2018 20: 53
              You, I hope, understand that this information is from the category of OBS and has no practical value. In the special literature, I did not see any mention of such cartridges. The Spitzgeschoss mit Eisenkern cartridge is usually indicated - a pointed bullet with a steel core.
              Despite the fact that the Germans produced a very large range of cartridges, up to cartridges intended for use in the tropics and cartridges for use in severe frosts.
              1. +1
                1 June 2018 21: 41
                I knew about a large nomenclature. My grandfather, during the Second World War, a German sniper seriously wounded in the shoulder with a bursting bullet. Grandfather spoke with a fragile core made of cast iron or similar metal. He remained alive, but became disabled, the fragments were not taken out. About cartridges for Wehrmacht snipers, I heard a couple of years ago.
                1. +1
                  1 June 2018 22: 15
                  Bursting? With a core? Something is strange ...
                2. +3
                  1 June 2018 22: 25
                  There was no fragile core bullet. And an explosive bullet cannot be with a core.
                  The Germans had a Beobachtung Patrone with a so-called targeting bullet. In fact, the burst bullet is incendiary.
                  This bullet looks like this.
                  1. +1
                    1 June 2018 23: 04
                    Here I wrote from the words of my grandfather. He said that the Germans already used the semblance of modern half-shells (this is my interpretation now, when I was an adult), which, when hit, collapsed and gave a lot of fragments, small, with mustard seed. And grandfather said that the Germans did so on purpose to inflict more severe wounds.
                    1. +2
                      2 June 2018 00: 34
                      Half-shell bullets are usually expansive, but not fragmented and not collapsing. And the explosive bullet is just completely destroyed.
                      1. +1
                        2 June 2018 10: 04
                        Grandfather just said bursting. But I still doubt that such were then. Therefore, he suggested that there was still a half-shell. Moreover, several larger fragments were taken out of the wound. But there was no bullet itself. She crumbled. It was then that my grandfather explained that the Germans had many different rounds of ammunition, among them those savage who were shot at him.
                  2. +1
                    2 June 2018 10: 43
                    There was no fragile core bullet.

                    Oddly enough, there were. They represented a shell filled with lead glass. It was used for shooting training, and with us. There were bullets with a concrete core ... Lead, after all, is not a very cheap material.
                    And during WWII, the Germans did experimentally produce cores, and then entirely bullets using powder technology. Moreover, they were labeled as SmE.
                    1. +2
                      2 June 2018 13: 29
                      They were marked as SmK (G), armor-piercing - a bullet of 12,57 g, with a tungsten carbide core, the initial speed of -911 m / s, armor penetration of 19 mm per 100 m.
                      SmE: (Spitzgeschoss mit Eisenkern): Steel-core bullet.
                      Experiments on the use of cheaper bullets from ersatz materials: solid stamped steel, turned and pressed from a mixture of metal-ceramic powders was carried out at the end of the war for a cartridge of 7,92x33.
                      1. +1
                        2 June 2018 13: 42

                        Bullet metal-ceramic cartridge 7,9 mm Kurzpatrone 43.
                      2. +1
                        2 June 2018 14: 01
                        They were labeled as SmK (G)


                        I didn’t write a word about armor-piercing ones.
                        It was made precisely rifle and it is under the marking SmE. Another conversation that did not take off. And the advent of high-precision screw rolling made the manufacture of cores much cheaper.
                        Cermet is a separate song that has nothing to do with this topic.
  4. +1
    2 June 2018 14: 03
    Grid,
    What do you mean by "powder technology"?
  5. +1
    2 June 2018 14: 04
    Curious,
    Bullet metal-ceramic cartridge 7,9 mm Kurzpatrone 43.

    Yeah. It is made of powder, but it’s never metal-ceramic. Read what the difference is, especially in the properties, albeit powder, but of metals and cermets.
    1. +1
      2 June 2018 14: 52
      Yeah. Do you really think that I can’t translate sintered steel? Purely technical error. Thanks for the tip.
      1. +1
        2 June 2018 16: 21
        Since my statement on cartridges was the reason for this discussion, let me finish it. I will try to express my doubts in order:
        1. I'll start with my grandfather. The bullet, before falling into it, could touch some object, for example, an automatic machine. Get damage from a collision and after that, tumbling, hit in the shoulder. From such a double blow and damage, fall apart, leaving a large hole. There are many tales among the soldiers, if they served, you’ll understand what I’m talking about, and this soldier’s rumor attributed to the Germans, who were better equipped with Soviet units, the presence of such cruel ammunition as explosive bullets.
        2. After listening to my grandfather, I suggested that the bullet was with an expansive effect and of poor quality materials. Therefore, under load, such damage could result.
        3. Germany of that time was periodically bombed. So, to fulfill the state order, industrialists could use components with lower properties. The most intense battles took place on the Eastern Front, which means that the vast majority of such cartridges fell on the Soviet-German front. And already here an unpleasant feature of such a cartridge was found out, they pierce less, but at the same time give severe damage already at the entrance to the wound.
        4. Now a small analogy with the modern army. Sometimes it happens that one of the soldiers slightly grinds the nose of the bullet. And charges in several horns, for example, every tenth such a sharpener. There is little sense from it (in the 5,45 caliber, anyway), the accuracy also drops dramatically, but when flying somewhere nearby, it emits an eerie howl, as if a messer on a shaver. So could the soldiers of the last war. Broken integrity led to worse accuracy, but when hit, the bullets fell apart. Only it is doubtful that the sniper used this, knowing in advance that it would be difficult to get there.
        5. Your picture with a German incendiary-explosive bullet is interesting. But then there should have been a burn. And about this, my grandfather did not say anything, and those who treated him apparently did not notice such an effect.
        Now about the cartridge of increased accuracy, to 98K. Since you know the nomenclature of German ammunition so well, it will be easier for you to find out exactly which cartridges are in question when I recall two details from that article. First, they wrote that the improvements concerned the first step of the sleeve. It was with slightly thicker walls, which in general gave greater rigidity to the entire cartridge. Secondly, attention was paid to a more accurate bullet landing. There was something about gunpowder, but I don’t remember. All together, this gave a higher accuracy when shooting. And it was also mentioned that each such cartridge cost the German treasury 2-3 times more expensive than usual with a steel core. Using this information, I think you, as a specialist, will be able to find the cartridges in question. After all, they could be marked differently than the options that we are discussing. Yours faithfully!
      2. +1
        10 June 2018 19: 05
        Do you really think that I can’t translate sintered steel?

        Well, if for you "sintered steel" = "cermet", then explaining something is simply useless.
  6. +1
    2 June 2018 20: 55
    Quote: Arkady Gaidar
    The main thing is to withstand a certain framework of the competition in order to draw objective conclusions, devoid of any speculation and bias.

    This is “yes”, but I still can’t even go to the site of the American Rifle Association - “no connection”.