Volley with Clubs: K-535 "Yuri Dolgoruky" showed power

126
The nuclear-powered submarine cruiser Yury Dolgoruky carried out a successful volley of Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles. It is reported that the launches took place from the waters of the White Sea. At the same time, targets for missiles were located at the Kamchatka Kura range.

The press service of the Federation Council of the Russian Navy reports that all the targets were successfully hit.



The volley consisted of the 4-x ICBM of the sea-based "Bulava". In fact, this is evidence that the missiles of this class have been brought to a fully operational state, which some “specialists” tried to challenge after earlier unsuccessful launches.

For reference: the underwater missile cruiser K-535 "Yuri Dolgoruky" - the lead ship belonging to the project 955 "Borey". 4th generation submarine. Its launching took place 10 years ago. Composed of fleet - since 2013. On board of weapons can carry 16 ICBM Bulava, as well as cruise missiles and torpedoes.

The crew of the "Yuri Dolgoruky" is 107 officers and sailors. The submerged speed is up to 29 nodes. The autonomy of swimming is 90 days. Atomic submarine cruiser immersion depth - 450 m.

Volley with Clubs: K-535 "Yuri Dolgoruky" showed power


PC-30 "Bulava" is a solid-fuel ICBM manufactured by the Votkinsk plant. The first test run was carried out in 2005 year. Of the previous launches of the Bulava, 28, a quarter were unsuccessful. This gave reason for some interested parties to say that the rocket is “raw”. Extreme 9 launches, including salvo, were successful.

It should be noted that the volley of four intercontinental ballistic missiles "Bulava" submarine "Yuri Dolgoruky" is carried out for the first time. Accordingly, the defeat of 4 targets by Bulava missiles at the Kamchatka training ground, in which single launches were carried out earlier, is also recorded for the first time.
126 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +49
    22 May 2018 20: 57
    As far as I understand, any launch is not an ordinary event and a brilliant result. Congratulations to the crew and commander!
    1. +9
      22 May 2018 21: 01
      And the mace did not fail !!!
      1. +72
        22 May 2018 21: 13
        A modest regional power, as it should be in terms of status, without leaving its region unequivocally indicated its modest regionality. Indiscreet super powers, please do not worry! Probably something like sovereignty. Congratulations to all involved! Thanks for the peaceful sky.
        1. +37
          22 May 2018 21: 18
          It is modest and regional by the ruling class of offshore maggots, which can only whimper, lament and humiliate themselves in front of those who have their money, which they, in turn, stole from the people of Russia ...
          1. +20
            22 May 2018 21: 36
            Quote: Greg Miller
            the ruling class of offshore maggots,

            It was under the control of offshore maggots that they made brilliant: high-speed Borey and compact and reliable Mace. It’s kind of according to liberal logic - Stalin was out of business, he defeated the people, like he flunked it with corpses. Glory to our engineers! good
            1. PN
              +2
              22 May 2018 22: 37
              Glory to the engineers say? I want to doubt. There is one small but big information in this article. More precisely, the lack of information (that it is clear that this is a state secret), namely: what is the time interval between missile launches? In conditions of war, the strategist is given a lifetime, will Borey have time to shoot all the ammunition before he ...
              1. +19
                22 May 2018 22: 46
                Quote: PN
                In conditions of war, the strategist is given a lifetime, will Borey have time to shoot all the ammunition before he ...

                Not just in time, but with impunity will leave the launch zone. The ocean is huge, but it is invisible and invulnerable. The launch is carried out from an underwater position, even if the satellites record the shooting of a full ammunition, timely launch of a carrier with anti-submarine weapons will fail. The boat will leave on all four sides in an unknown direction.
                1. +6
                  23 May 2018 07: 41
                  Quote: hrych
                  Not just in time, but with impunity will leave the launch zone.

                  recourse Do not deprive the boy of illusions !!!
                  1. PN
                    0
                    23 May 2018 18: 08
                    I see you are far from the fleet.
                    1. +1
                      24 May 2018 07: 25
                      Quote: PN
                      I see you are far from the fleet.

                      Of course, far, at the moment 4 000 km to the nearest fleet!
              2. +14
                22 May 2018 23: 36
                Good question. The fact is that a volley from under water is not a trivial task. Not being a specialist, he was still interested in this issue. At one time, 16 missiles were fired with an interval of 20 seconds between launches. As far as I know, nobody was able to repeat this.
                Operation Hippopotamus 2
                1. +3
                  23 May 2018 04: 19
                  The interval there was much smaller ...
                  1. +15
                    23 May 2018 08: 36
                    Here's the video as they say drift clubs
                    1. jjj
                      +2
                      23 May 2018 10: 22
                      Let's go well. Specially day guessed with good weather. Before that, the sky was stormy and in clouds. And today a storm warning and a cloud of clouds. And then, how specially for the companions of the adversary was allowed
              3. +4
                22 May 2018 23: 38
                There is one small but big information in this article. More precisely, the lack of information (that it is clear that this is a state secret), namely: what is the time interval between missile launches?

                Well, yes ... Not announced.
                The launch of four missiles from one "strategist", as you put it, is already an achievement. In essence, what is a submarine cruiser? Poor such a floating launch pad with mines. It is clear that a big, iron, tricked out ... But ... This is not happening on earth, but in the water ... Launching one rocket, as I understand it, this is serious work.
                I won’t be clever - it’s not a morman - but if you are not too lazy to google “Operation Hippo” and “Operation Hippo 2”. In general, the essence of the issue is described.
                1. jjj
                  +2
                  23 May 2018 10: 25
                  Quote: KOT BYUN
                  if you are not too lazy to google "Operation Hippo" and "Operation Hippo 2"

                  What Wikipedia considers Behemoth-2 was actually the first Behemoth. The second hippo is when pr. 941 in front of the eyes of Western journalists released, consider disposed of, the ammunition of missiles for which the working hours were ending
                  1. +3
                    23 May 2018 16: 13
                    The first Behemoth was in 1989. Unsuccessful due to miscalculations in the finalization of experimental products. One of the missiles in the mine banged. Whether it was an explosion or not, they still argue. But when a lid weighing several tons comes off as a result of this "no explosion" and flies almost the entire "ship", more than 100 meters, breaks through the Central City Hospital ... Well, let it be called cotton. Then I had to “pick out” the remains of the rocket from the mine. The second "Hippo" was held on August 6, 1991 K-407 "Novomoskovsk" under the command of captain of the 2nd rank Sergey Vladimirovich Egorov. The first one left at 21-10 Moscow time, the last one left in less than 3 minutes.
                    In 1997, the crew of Captain 1st Rank Alexander Sergeyevich Bogachev twice made a volley of full ammunition at TRPKSN 941 of the TK-13 and TK-20 project. Thus, the disposal of products R-39 (3M-65). Unfortunately, neither Yegorov nor Bogachev is with us, these wonderful commanders left very young ... Bogachev spent 60 launches for his service.
                    Well, in December 8, an 1969-rocket salvo fired the K-140 “azuh” under the command of Yuri Flavianovich Beketov (1932-2015).
                    If memory serves, then the Americans did not release more than 4.
              4. +5
                23 May 2018 00: 23
                Quote: PN
                Glory to the engineers say? I want to doubt. There is one small but big information in this article. More precisely, the lack of information (that it is clear that this is a state secret), namely: what is the time interval between missile launches? .
                "the answer will pull for ten years"
                is it clear?
                1. 0
                  23 May 2018 12: 55
                  Quote: SEER
                  "the answer will pull for ten years"
                  is it clear?

                  Do not scare the person. The network has a video, take a stopwatch and pinpoint. stop
                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&
                  ; v = VUdIUdouLv0
              5. +4
                23 May 2018 06: 19
                The interval is visible on the video! Take a look! Well done guys!))
              6. +2
                23 May 2018 06: 35
                Quote: PN
                In conditions of war, the strategist is given a lifetime, will Borey have time to shoot all the ammunition before he ...

                You confused boats. This issue could be attributed to the SSAR, as they act next to the goal and the option to get an answer is very likely. SSBN this applies to a much lesser extent. The ocean is big and the mace flies far
              7. NKT
                0
                23 May 2018 06: 42
                In 1991, all 16 missiles were fired in five minutes, about a 20s pause.
                1. +2
                  23 May 2018 07: 22
                  One rocket is worth the mass, and then 16 missiles to be released from the mines. Perhaps the boat was chatting, God forbid. In 5 minutes the ship's displacement has changed very much
          2. +9
            22 May 2018 21: 49
            Quote: Greg Miller
            It is modest and regional by the ruling class of offshore maggots who can only whimper, lament and humiliate themselves in front of those who have their money, which they, in turn, stole from the people of Russia

            Well poop must be thrown. liberals flag in hand No.
            1. +12
              22 May 2018 22: 40
              In fact, this is proof that the missiles of this class are brought to a fully operational state, which some “experts” tried to challenge after earlier unsuccessful launches.

              No more talk. The state is combat ready. Commander and crew well done !!! soldier
        2. 0
          23 May 2018 14: 02
          It looks ridiculous, frankly. Especially against the background of poverty among Russian pensioners.
      2. +19
        22 May 2018 21: 27
        Bandera shot from 4 used Javelins, and Russia with 4 Clubs! Interestingly, Petyun with his dodges still wants to hold a parade on Red Square and in the Crimea, or will he “pity” Russia? laughing
        1. +5
          22 May 2018 21: 52
          Quote: Major Yurik
          Bandera shot from 4 used Javelins, and Russia with 4 Clubs! Interestingly, Petyun with his dodges still wants to hold a parade on Red Square and in the Crimea, or will he “pity” Russia?

          I need a bridge in Crimea to carry candy laughing a little expensive by the sea laughing
        2. +2
          22 May 2018 22: 33
          By the way, they reminded me, Major.
          Something I have not heard for a long time, how puppeteers cast out over a flightless Mace.
          I suspect that they just forgot about her like Guppy fish.
          1. +1
            22 May 2018 22: 41
            Quote: Pereira
            Something I have not heard for a long time, how puppeteers cast out over a flightless Mace

            and for what? right now they have a new jivilin toy. holiday laughing
        3. 0
          23 May 2018 14: 03
          And why should he? For him, the Americans are now shooting the Tridents.
  2. +6
    22 May 2018 20: 58
    Well done !!! There are no words !!!!
  3. +13
    22 May 2018 21: 00
    The last 9 launches, including volley launches were successful.

    Something I think that it was no longer the Mace, but Mace-M. After Solomonov was turned inside with his fur, and was given the task of redoing it with a run, apparently everything was fixed, God forbid.
    1. +12
      22 May 2018 21: 02
      How much you and I argued about the mace. M - not M, no difference. The rocket was brought to mind. And you suggested to refuse it.
      1. +2
        22 May 2018 21: 04
        Quote: Muvka
        How much you and I argued about the mace. M - not M, no difference. The rocket was brought to mind. And you suggested to refuse it.

        No ... I suggested considering the BARK option ... but at the same time, I said that the Bulava would be modernized precisely because the percentage of successful launches was unacceptably low. And that is precisely why Solomonov was driven from his position by a filthy broom.
        1. +9
          22 May 2018 21: 19
          Quote: NEXUS
          Quote: Muvka
          How much you and I argued about the mace. M - not M, no difference. The rocket was brought to mind. And you suggested to refuse it.

          No ... I suggested considering the BARK option ... but at the same time, I said that the Bulava would be modernized precisely because the percentage of successful launches was unacceptably low. And that is precisely why Solomonov was driven from his position by a filthy broom.

          Congratulations to you, arguing))))) Great news, especially against the background of the previous one about the additional series of Boreev. In addition, the Mace confirms its characteristics. Nicely.
          1. +2
            22 May 2018 21: 22
            Quote: Orkraider
            In addition, the mace confirms its characteristics.

            I won’t be surprised if they put a nuclear reactor on Mace in order to increase the range ... I suppose the petrel and Poseidon are smaller in size ...
            1. +9
              22 May 2018 21: 31
              If a nuclear engine is put on the Mace .... then it will be another missile. wink
              I recall: - if my grandmother had eggs, then she would be a grandfather laughing
              1. +1
                22 May 2018 21: 35
                Quote: For example
                If a nuclear engine is put on the Mace .... then it will be another missile.

                Do you think that ETA Mace is the same as it was at the very beginning? Apparently to my grandmother, I managed to attach grandfather's junkies ...
                1. 0
                  22 May 2018 21: 36
                  So great! The main thing is that it has become stable.
                  The realization has already come that the bet is on missiles, and not on submarines (in this case, the Boreas decided not to upgrade globally). Therefore, there will be nuclear reactors on missiles.
                  You are right. hi
                  1. +1
                    22 May 2018 21: 40
                    Quote: For example
                    So great! The main thing is that it has become stable.

                    Range if a little increased, up to 15 thousand, it’s normal ... the casting weight there is just a little more than a ton ... at the BARK this figure was under 2,5 tons.
                    1. 0
                      23 May 2018 09: 39
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Quote: For example
                      So great! The main thing is that it has become stable.

                      Range if a little increased, up to 15 thousand, it’s normal ... the casting weight there is just a little more than a ton ... at the BARK this figure was under 2,5 tons.

                      This is in 2006 a little more than a ton was the cast weight. And now in the yard 2018 ...
    2. +3
      22 May 2018 21: 55
      Quote: NEXUS
      Something I think that it was no longer Mace, but Mace-M

      Andrey, what's the difference what letter is there? smile the main thing is that the product should be delivered to its intended purpose smile Alfafit then let the rafters teach.
      if you have time laughing
      1. +1
        22 May 2018 22: 01
        Quote: LSA57
        Andrey, what's the difference what letter is there?

        Very big difference, Sergey. Iskander was not adopted, but adopted Iskander-M.
        Quote: LSA57
        the main thing is that the product should be delivered as intended by alfafit then let the rafters teach.
        if you have time

        Mace, in addition to the number of unsuccessful launches, had two more problems: Small abandoned weight (at Sineva it is under 2,7 tons) and range. Now, if during the modernization of this ICBM these two indicators were increased, then it is wonderful. That is why I said about the mini nuclear reactor.
        1. +1
          22 May 2018 22: 22
          Quote: NEXUS
          Very big difference, Sergey. Iskander was not adopted, but adopted Iskander-M.

          Andrey, you misunderstood me again smile yes let any letters be smile the result is important. this I mean) not letters smile
          1. +3
            22 May 2018 22: 25
            Quote: LSA57
            the result is important. this I mean) not letters

            So I voiced two problems that I would like to be resolved in Bulava-M, so that the RESULT is excellent. Successful launches are not all ... we need improved performance characteristics of the rocket, so that the RESULT "pleased" to the impossibility of adversary.
            1. +2
              22 May 2018 22: 48
              Quote: NEXUS
              So I voiced two problems that I would like to be resolved

              it was with me. personally saw. SAS test. both are unsuccessful. at least then one crew escaped.
        2. +1
          23 May 2018 09: 08
          Only 20 years have passed since the start of work on the "club" ... Regarding the payload. If this mass includes the required number of warheads with the required mass, then let them at least one kilogram. Another point - there will be no modernization reserve. Solid rockets have a big storage problem. Solid fuel is subject to cracking during temperature fluctuations, which leads to uneven combustion with all the consequences, and then the transition to the blasting category ...
          In general, the 941st project was firing full ammunition in the early 2000s, the K-140 series was firing after modernization, 8 units were fired, and the Novomoskovsk full ammunition in August 1991.
  4. +2
    22 May 2018 21: 00
    God forbid that missiles continue to fail! And then beat the adversary, and the rocket dog knows where it hangs around wassat and not flying to phishington or penthouses; !! belay
    1. +1
      22 May 2018 22: 58
      Quote: ANCIENT
      and not flying to phishington or penthouses; !!

      allow a small correction. let him get into the toilet. laughing
  5. +12
    22 May 2018 21: 01
    All the lies are cardboard rockets, plasticine submarines.
    1. +7
      22 May 2018 21: 28
      And anti-aircraft systems INFLATABLE! smile And the tanks too ....
    2. +5
      22 May 2018 23: 00
      Quote: poquello
      All the lies are cardboard rockets, plasticine submarines.

      aha laughing
  6. +2
    22 May 2018 21: 03
    STRONGLY !!! Pleased !!!
  7. +3
    22 May 2018 21: 08
    For this, even liberoids must drink, for this is the guarantor of a peaceful sky above their heads.
  8. +4
    22 May 2018 21: 14
    This, of course, is very good, but in connection with the development of super sensitive magnetometers:

    any submarine of 10 thousand tons or more is easily detected by an anti-submarine aircraft.
    The sensitivity of magnetometers in SQUIDs - FEMOTESLA is several orders of magnitude more sensitive than that of the best geophysical magnetometer, ANY piece of iron is visible, and you have to switch to titanium or composites. Glory to the Central Nevsky Plant! Therefore, you need to build boats no more than Ash, and somehow cram into it inadvertently, i.e., Bulava or Sineva.
    1. +1
      22 May 2018 21: 18
      Or a composite submarine coating.
      1. +2
        22 May 2018 22: 33
        Quote: Vadim237
        Or composite coating A

        or 300 false targets for each boat
      2. 0
        23 May 2018 00: 26
        Quote: Vadim237
        Or a composite submarine coating.

        or whole composite submarine. in the family of my friends back in the 60s, such conversations were conducted in all seriousness.
    2. +4
      22 May 2018 21: 21
      What, and in the waters of the White and Okhotsk seas, this magnetometer will help detect nuclear submarines ???
      1. +2
        22 May 2018 21: 31
        Yes, if they let the plane fly over there. But the option of flocks of DRONs with magnetometers in Squid is not ruled out. And now, from the satellites, the swelling of the ocean surface is visible when the strategist pops up to launch the BR.
        1. +15
          22 May 2018 22: 07
          Yes, if they let the plane fly over there. But the option of flocks of DRONs with magnetometers in Squid is not ruled out. And now, from the satellites, the swelling of the ocean surface is visible when the strategist pops up to launch the BR.

          What's up with the Argentinean submarine? Found it right away?
          1. -2
            23 May 2018 01: 05
            "Magnеtometer "...
            An expert with an engineering background is immediately visible, yes.
            1. +1
              23 May 2018 20: 36
              An expert with an engineering background is immediately visible, yes.

              Even if we assume that he was mistaken with the letter, for the sake of interest he could, simply, read about the accidents of submarines and their subsequent search by rescuers. In the oceans, there are actually a lot of metal debris and magnetic anomalies, and finding a submarine for any fleet is not a trivial task. Cases are not uncommon when a submarine that is already "lit up" can be lost and it takes a lot of time to find it later. A magnetometer is just one of the tools to find them, but it is far from a panacea. Its work depends on the distance to the object and its magnetic properties. Using non-magnetic materials or using large depths for movement, even an ultra-sensitive magnetometer is rendered useless.
              PS On the other hand, you can lift all the iron debris from the bottom! A useful thing for ecologists is for sure!
        2. +1
          23 May 2018 04: 09
          Quote: Tektor
          Yes, if they let the plane fly over there. But the option of flocks of DRONs with magnetometers in Squid is not ruled out. And now, from the satellites, the swelling of the ocean surface is visible when the strategist pops up to launch the BR.

          That is if he is aimed precisely at that place. Finding a boat about in the ocean is not even a needle in a haystack! And specifically for defeat, it is almost impossible. It is necessary to conduct each boat from the place of its immersion.
          1. 0
            23 May 2018 08: 35
            So they are being led ... I do not want to be clever, because I did not serve in the Navy. But I had to sit next to the hydroacoustic of the 6th Fleet. Already in civilian life. He grazed our submarines in the Atlantic for ten years. It did not spread much, but sometimes they chatted in the smoking room. Submarines are from the moment of immersion. And even from the moment of going to sea. To my question, "Are Soviet submarines so noisy?" he replied, "Very noisy and unfortunately very fast. They go faster than our torpedoes."
            This is all an attempt at humor. In the presence of PLO helicopters and aircraft, speed does not matter much. But providing a submersible diving area is the main task of the Northern and Pacific Fleets. Any submarine missile launch is a combat operation to ensure stealth deployment.
            1. jjj
              +2
              23 May 2018 10: 34
              Quote: Bakht
              But I had to sit next to the sonar of the 6 Fleet.

              On the bunks nearby were hooked?
              When I was young, when I was drinking, I also liked to listen to different stories and tell them myself
              1. 0
                23 May 2018 10: 42
                No, we worked nearby .... Companions .... The fact is that, by civilian specialty, I also had to listen to the ocean ...
    3. +9
      22 May 2018 21: 32
      And how did you gather under the ice of the Arctic to look for them? A little bit in the subject, so I’ll say that withИyou exaggerate with tomometers ....
      1. +1
        22 May 2018 21: 36
        Ice is no different from water in magnetic properties.
        1. +4
          22 May 2018 21: 40
          What will you look for under the ice ?, well, the boat will go into the zone of magnetic anomaly, no magnetometer will help you ... yet I repeat finding a boat remotely at great depth is practically possible only by accident ....
          1. 0
            23 May 2018 08: 41
            I did not use magnetometers. But in 2002, work was carried out in the Caspian to search for oil and gas. And the oil company (!) Decided to shoot 4C. I myself was there and drank honey beer. Permission received six months. From the Pentagon. For the simple reason that 4C sensors are military technology. Received them almost piece by piece. With the most severe requirements. Not a single device was supposed to fall into the hands of Iran. When an Iranian plane passed over us, the party leader (American) immediately turned off work.
            It is not difficult to find a boat at sea with an expanded sensor system. But the principle of operation is not based on a magnetic field. Hint - there is an accelerometer :-)
            1. NKT
              0
              23 May 2018 14: 25
              And the letter C, what does it mean? Not to be confused with 3D seismic? As I understand it, the number 4 indicates the time, i.e. shooting - repeated?
              1. 0
                23 May 2018 14: 42
                There is 3D seismic (dimension), there is 4D. Seismic sensors 4C (components) is not news. Three parameters of a longitudinal wave (along three-dimensional axes) plus a transverse wave are measured. Given that transverse waves do not propagate in the water, the sensors are at the bottom.
                But even ordinary geophones can notice a wake trace. The sensitivity of the group is 20 microvolts per microbar. The first were 32 microvolts. Too sensitive. I had to be rude, because the noise of the sea drowned out a useful signal. On the Omega system, I saw a ship at a distance of five miles. And he could determine its course and speed. I didn’t see any submarines, but I think that any submarine will leave a wake mark.
                This is all civil engineering. Any marine geophysicist can tell how other vessels interfere with him and what he sees on the screen.
        2. 0
          22 May 2018 21: 48
          Under ice the boat how will you hit? I heard years there in places a few meters ...
          1. +1
            22 May 2018 22: 01
            Rods from orbit:

            For this, an extra-heavy rocket is being developed.
            1. +1
              22 May 2018 23: 11
              Quote: Tektor
              Rods from orbit:

              For this, an extra-heavy rocket is being developed.

              You just troll)))) I understand))) and I seriously answer;))))
            2. +1
              23 May 2018 00: 29
              Quote: Tektor
              Rods from orbit:

              For this, an extra-heavy rocket is being developed.

              why not lasers from orbit? Ronald our Reagan told us at one time and he didn’t tell such fables ...
              1. 0
                23 May 2018 01: 07
                Yes, this is a teenager with incomplete secondary education. Never mind.
                1. 0
                  23 May 2018 21: 00
                  He who has eyes will see ... Brains will understand ...
                  And at work, I often come across magnetrons than magnetometers. Hence the error.
                  A tungsten rod with a diameter of about 50 cm and a length of 6 m, weighing under 6 tons with guidance engines. At a speed of 7 km / s, the collision energy for the target will be 70 tons of TNT.
                  The main danger is related to the possibility of searching for submarines by a line of DRONs flying at an altitude of 50-80 m above the water, which can detect any submarine at depths of up to 350-400 m.
    4. +2
      22 May 2018 22: 21
      The ICBM launch area from submarine missile carriers is the Arctic Ocean. There it is problematic to look for nuclear submarines under the ice.
    5. +7
      22 May 2018 22: 41
      Quote: Tektor
      This, of course, is very good, but in connection with the development of super sensitive magnetometers:

      any submarine of 10 thousand tons or more is easily detected by an anti-submarine aircraft.
      The sensitivity of magnetometers in SQUIDs - FEMOTESLA is several orders of magnitude more sensitive than that of the best geophysical magnetometer, ANY piece of iron is visible, and you have to switch to titanium or composites. Glory to the Central Nevsky Plant! Therefore, you need to build boats no more than Ash, and somehow cram into it inadvertently, i.e., Bulava or Sineva.

      Thank! He laughed. You have perfectly described the scanning SQUID microscope. I recommend opening the SQUID magnetometer using the following link to anyone who wants to understand what is at stake and get acquainted with the SB RAS patent (Russian patent No. 2246129).

      http://kirensky.ru/ru/institute/sci_equipment/skv
      id

      Essentially: magnetometers (AN / ASQ-501, AN / ASQ-81) are currently in service with the US and Canada, but they are very problematic and have a small radius.
      Submarine Search Magnetometric Tools
      Means of this purpose are not intended for the initial search for submarines, due to their small detection range in comparison with buoys and sonar stations, as well as low information content. Magnetometric devices work on the principle of recording local anomalies of the Earth’s magnetic field caused by the presence of submarines. A magnetically saturated flux-gate oriented along the lines of force of the Earth’s magnetic field was used as a sensitive element on the magnetometers of the first samples. These magnetometers included AN / ASQ-10A. Such magnetometers were notable for their low sensitivity and susceptibility to interference.
      Significantly higher capabilities of optically pumped magnetometers, called "quantum". In magnetometers of this type, atoms in a gaseous medium are excited when light of a certain wavelength is exposed to them, and their energy levels are measured using an induction coil by changing a previously applied magnetic field of a certain frequency. Before starting work, such a sensor needs warming up for 3-5 minutes. Magnetometers of this type (AN / ASQ-501, AN / ASQ-81) are widely used in Canada and the USA. One of their drawbacks is the complexity of maintenance. The detection range of modern submarines using magnetometers does not exceed 400-500 m, depending on the magnitude of their magnetic field.

      The only ones who claimed a range of 6 km with the revolutionary SQUID are the Chinese. But they very often claim breakouts and breakthroughs that refute physical principles. But I don’t believe them, until they proved and confirmed none ..
      1. +1
        23 May 2018 13: 11
        Quote: Orkraider
        The detection range of modern submarines using magnetometers does not exceed 400-500 m, depending on the magnitude of their magnetic field.

        A steel submarine hull made of ferromagnetic steel introduces disturbances into the Earth’s magnetic field with an amplitude of 100 G (Gauss) at a distance of hull length l ~ 0.5 m. The amplitude of the perturbations of the magnetic field can be ~ 0.5 G. At a distance L = 10 km from the nuclear submarine hull, this disturbance will weaken by (l / L) ^ 3 = 10 ^ 6 times, and will be on the order of 10 ^ -6 gf. Such a magnetic field can be detected by sensitive SQUID magnetometers. For example, the intensity of the magnetic field of the human heart is a million times less than the magnetic field of the Earth, it is only ten millionths of Gauss, but it is reliably detected by SQUIDs.
        Submarine transceivers can operate on a similar principle of radiation of a magnetic dipole: They release an insulated single-core electric cable with a length of 100 m from the submarine.
        The central core at the end of the cable is exposed and contaminated with sea water. An electric current i = 100A is placed in a cable with a nuclear submarine. At a distance of r = 100m from the cable, a magnetic field B = 2 * I / C / r = 0.2 * i (A) / r (sm) = 2 * 10 ^ -3G (Gauss) is induced. At a distance of R = 10 km from the cable, a magnetic field h = B * (r / R) ^ 3 = 2 * 10 ^ -9 G. If an alternating current is introduced into the cable, then the energy of the alternating magnetic field decreases with distance more slowly - proportionally to the square of the distance, and can be detected by a correlation radio at a distance of several thousand km.
        1. +2
          23 May 2018 20: 51
          At a distance L = 10 km from the nuclear submarine hull, this disturbance will weaken by (l / L) ^ 3 = 10 ^ 6 times, and will be on the order of 10 ^ -6 gf. Such a magnetic field can be detected by sensitive SQUID magnetometers. For example, the intensity of the magnetic field of the human heart is a million times less than the magnetic field of the Earth, it is only ten millionths of Gauss, but it is reliably detected by SQUIDs.

          ... And you will successfully begin to record sunken barrels, lost anchors and other iron debris, as well as magnetic anomalies caused by floating fish or solar storms. Magnetometers are just one of the tools, and in itself it is not a panacea. Somehow he didn’t really help in finding the same Argentinean submarine. hi
    6. +4
      22 May 2018 22: 54
      Quote: Tektor
      This, of course, is very good, but in connection with the development of super sensitive magnetometers:

      oh yes bullshit all this laughing
  9. +1
    22 May 2018 21: 19
    And how many of us, the carriers of the Mace, have?
    1. +5
      22 May 2018 22: 16
      Quote: 123456789
      how many of us Mace carriers do we have?

      The fleet consists of three (pr.955), five more are being built (pr.955A). Until 2023, it is planned to lay six more Boreev-A (pr955A). Something like this.
  10. +2
    22 May 2018 21: 21
    Well done. I hope the launch video will be shown .... Who knows when the Apple Ash will be transferred to the fleet in Kazan? They’ve been experiencing for a very long time.
    1. +3
      23 May 2018 00: 50
      Quote: nikolas 83
      Well done. I hope the launch video will be shown .... Who knows when the Apple Ash will be transferred to the fleet in Kazan? They’ve been experiencing for a very long time.

      The atomic submarine Kazan will be handed over to the fleet in 2019
      Kazan’s multipurpose nuclear submarine Project 885 (M) Ash will be handed over to the fleet in 2019, the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexei Rakhmanov told reporters on Wednesday.

      http://www.atomic-energy.ru/news/2018/03/22/84292
  11. +13
    22 May 2018 21: 24
    The joke remembered ... the old bearded one.
    Ilya Muromets and Alyosha Popovich go into the tavern, Ilya inadvertently steps on one of the Frenchmen, crushed hard. The Frenchman got up, hysterical, saying: "the peasant is a rough-handed peasant, I challenge you to a duel."
    Frenchman: Calls up the sencundant and says, draw a white cross on chalk on Ilya’s shoulder.
    Ilya: What for?
    Frenchman: I tell you there I will mark and stab with a sword.
    Ilya: He measured the frog’s gaze with that look and said to Alyosha: “I’ll beat him with chalk with a BULOVA” ... smile
  12. +2
    22 May 2018 21: 26
    It’s time to make a mobile training ground somewhere on the outskirts of Syria, otherwise they’ll beat on the Kura, soon they will make a hole. sad
    1. jjj
      0
      23 May 2018 10: 38
      Reindeer are scared, then the meat is harsh
  13. +3
    22 May 2018 21: 27
    So today, the submarine’s coating is composite. The landlords are not in vain retiring: women are 45 years old, men are 50. And on the Yu-3 magnet and 50 years ago rolled like a puck on ice.
    1. jjj
      0
      23 May 2018 10: 39
      In Severodvinsk, women, not even from the factory, retire at 50, and men at 55
  14. +4
    22 May 2018 21: 41
    1/4 "Hippo". That is, a quarter of a volley from the possible. But it is encouraging. However, it seems that it will be necessary to return to the direct YOU tests, so that the points from Novaya Zemlya Misty Albion with all sorts of insects such as "May" or "Johnson" significantly shake. Otherwise, they will not calm down and realize until the fifth point they feel that it’s not the “Novice” to sniff, then a fatal outcome is guaranteed, for these islands for sure.
  15. +3
    22 May 2018 21: 46
    Well done, this can be said another victory of Russia, another ...
  16. +6
    22 May 2018 21: 46
    Quote: Tektor
    Ice is no different from water in magnetic properties.

    Ento, where did you find such nonsense from, but is it nothing that the ice in the ocean is fresh and the water is salty? laughing
  17. +1
    22 May 2018 21: 55
    Truly amazing news - after 28 years (!) They managed to launch a volley! I shake hands with our naval Friends - Seven feet under the keel and SUCCESSES IN BATTLE PREPARATION !!!
  18. +2
    22 May 2018 21: 57
    "Partners", catch! A surprise flies to you. And remember, you are in the affected area!
  19. LMN
    +5
    22 May 2018 22: 00
    Surprisingly, not a single comment requiring evidence or “about noodles” on the ears what
    Happy lol
    1. +5
      22 May 2018 22: 19
      Quote: LMN
      not a single comment demanding evidence or "about noodles" on the ears

      Duc, it’s dumb - but how will they show it ... wassat
  20. +1
    22 May 2018 22: 24
    Boreas once said to the sun:
    “Sun, you shine brightly!
    You revive the whole earth
    The warmth of its rays! ..
    But will you compare with me?
    I am a hundred times stronger than you!
    I want - I’ll start, I will conquer
    And in a minute the clouds are dark
    Darken your bright beam.
    The whole earth shines
    You give out without noise
    Quietly come to heaven
    Continuing on in silence
    And your sunset is calm!
    My custom is not like that!
    With a roar, a whistle, I fly
    I turn everything on, indignant everything,
    Everything trembles before me!
    So am I the king of the earth? ..
  21. +1
    22 May 2018 22: 41
    Nope. Well, I'm a patriot and relative old-timer of VO. But I don’t believe it. Each launch - several cameras are removed. Since there is no video, it means a jamb. I'm sorry. A competent article and graphs will give everything out - successful and not-so-good launches, take-off videos, or even with downward ballistics .. Such simple “telephone” conversations indicate that “it’s sucks.” I’ll bury all the trolls, but now I’m saying that there is no such evidence as before.
    1. +3
      22 May 2018 22: 51
      Quote: Manul
      I mean that there is no such evidence, as it was before.

      Duc, they just shot back, it’s too early to lay out the schedules. A couple of hours ago, the news was marked "urgently." So the debriefing is yet to come. Yes
      1. +1
        22 May 2018 23: 17
        Quote: Paranoid50
        Duc, they just shot back, it’s too early to lay out the schedules.

        As if they were shooting at barmels in Syria with caliber - the news in all the media reports Shoigu to him.
        1. 0
          23 May 2018 09: 46
          Are you okay?
          http://ren.tv/novosti/2018-05-23/video-istoriches
          kogo-puska-chetyreh-raket-bulava-s-yuriya-dolgoru
          whom
  22. 0
    22 May 2018 23: 08
    Well, nice, volley at once with four missiles is launched quite often, even if our western "partners" have a little less fervor.
  23. +4
    22 May 2018 23: 13
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Orkraider
    In addition, the mace confirms its characteristics.

    I won’t be surprised if they put a nuclear reactor on Mace in order to increase the range ... I suppose the petrel and Poseidon are smaller in size ...

    Andrew! Do you want to put a 100-megaton warhead? Why trifle with a nuclear reactor, which will not be known for what there. You already have some kind of mania. The Bulava flew well - that means it was not the Bulava, but the Bulava-M (which had never been tested before). Now the reactor must be shoved into a solid-fuel rocket. I have already offered you. do not trifle. A 100-megaton BG weighing 40 tons for a rocket with a throwing weight of 1,15 tons is the most ...
    1. 0
      23 May 2018 00: 05
      Quote: Old26
      Why trifle with a nuclear reactor, which will not be known for what there.

      Vladimir, I explained in black in Russian why ... at Bulava, the range was insufficient, as well as the weight being thrown. And then mania? At Sineva, the rate of cast weight is more than 2 times higher. And if we take into account the range at which the rocket will hit Sarmat from any pole and direction, then we get an additional advantage. In my opinion, the benefits are obvious.
      Quote: Old26
      The "Mace" flew well - that means it was not a "Mace", but a "Mace-M"

      Vladimir, you don’t have to pretend to be a hose ... a couple of years ago it was announced that the Bulava ICBM would be modernized ... don’t say that you didn’t know that.
      Quote: Old26
      A 100-megaton BG weighing 40 tons for a rocket with a throwing weight of 1,15 tons is the most ...

      When installing a nuclear reactor, it is possible to double the weight of the casting weight by comparing this figure with Sineva.
      1. +3
        23 May 2018 00: 33
        Quote: NEXUS
        When installing a nuclear reactor, it is possible to double the weight of the casting weight by comparing this figure with Sineva.




        Don’t waste your time. It’s possible to push not a nuclear reactor, but immediately a plasma ionizer and hit the adversary three times round the moon’s poles ... do not forget to turn the ROFAR wire to the side ... I give the idea as an old friend. 2 new accs can be added to the general plus sign by pluses ..
        1. +2
          23 May 2018 00: 38
          Quote: Town Hall
          . with your abilities for empty illiterate balabolism

          You have enough brains that you’ve got stupid comments, then scribbling and sitting talking about pumping profiles and yes ... be sure to scratch about ROFAR. You know, for some reason I’m sure that when ROFAR appears in 2-3 years, you will suddenly disappear from VO, or stupidly create a new prof.
          At the same time, looking at your comments, to say that you are a balabol ... well, probably this will not be true. Tk promised to swear without touching the clave, ... well, you understand. Go with God.
        2. +1
          23 May 2018 00: 41
          Quote: Town Hall
          00:3

          what a dream does not come, our newly recognized Italian.
          not sleeping well, right - don’t sleep: turn around and then get sticky.
          and we will percuss what we deem necessary, where we deem necessary and when we deem necessary.
          but your destiny is to sweat and sleep lightly.
          sleep my joy ...
        3. 0
          23 May 2018 20: 31
          Well, why are you doing this, the nexus seeks to reach the heights of the great MIKHAN, but so far it’s not working out well
      2. +1
        23 May 2018 08: 33
        > When installing a nuclear reactor, it is possible to at least double the throw weight, making this indicator equal to Sineva.

        A mobile nuclear reactor is an outstanding scientific and technical achievement without any questions, but it will take many years to develop a real rocket based on it. Here it’s more real to talk about something else - thanks to such compact mobile reactors, it is possible to create compact submarines with a good set of weapons, and all this is very cheap.

        That is, this is the revival of Lira, which no one will talk about yet, using Husky as a curtain
      3. 0
        23 May 2018 09: 49
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: Old26
        Why trifle with a nuclear reactor, which will not be known for what there.

        Vladimir, I explained in black in Russian why ... at Bulava, the range was insufficient, as well as the weight being thrown. And then mania? At Sineva, the rate of cast weight is more than 2 times higher. And if we take into account the range at which the rocket will hit Sarmat from any pole and direction, then we get an additional advantage. In my opinion, the benefits are obvious.
        Quote: Old26
        The "Mace" flew well - that means it was not a "Mace", but a "Mace-M"

        Vladimir, you don’t have to pretend to be a hose ... a couple of years ago it was announced that the Bulava ICBM would be modernized ... don’t say that you didn’t know that.
        Quote: Old26
        A 100-megaton BG weighing 40 tons for a rocket with a throwing weight of 1,15 tons is the most ...

        When installing a nuclear reactor, it is possible to double the weight of the casting weight by comparing this figure with Sineva.

        So, did you compare the weight of the rocket and the dimensions with the Blue? The mace is a small rocket in itself. And maybe a lot more Sineva, up to a short acceleration section, flat trajectory and maneuvering ...
      4. jjj
        0
        23 May 2018 10: 42
        Quote: NEXUS
        by comparing this indicator with Blue.

        And not the "Blue" already ...
  24. 0
    23 May 2018 00: 13
    Well finalized the rocket, They soon promise a modification of the rocket.
    Given the fact that you will have to write off the strategies of old projects,
    the news is just great.
  25. 0
    23 May 2018 04: 55
    Great news, I think, it will not add optimism to the Anglo-Saxons.
  26. 0
    23 May 2018 06: 22
    Oh no wonder the people involved in the creation of the "Mace" eat bread! Honor to you and praise!
  27. +1
    23 May 2018 07: 20
    Quote: PN
    Glory to the engineers say? I want to doubt. There is one small but big information in this article. More precisely, the lack of information (that it is clear that this is a state secret), namely: what is the time interval between missile launches? In conditions of war, the strategist is given a lifetime, will Borey have time to shoot all the ammunition before he ...

    Naturally, there is an interval between the launch of each missile, both ICBM and KR. He is small (but quite certain), he will have time to shoot back and leave. Also, nonproliferated information refers to a set of purely technical measures from a PLA during rocket firing. Nothing unusual, everyone has it.
  28. 0
    23 May 2018 08: 51
    Again Anglo-Saxons somewhere borzanuli?
  29. +2
    23 May 2018 11: 10
    Andrew! Do not be offended by my sometimes venomous remarks. I consider you to be an adequate interlocutor, but sometimes you "wedge"

    Quote: NEXUS
    Vladimir, I explained in black in Russian why ... at Bulava, the range was insufficient, as well as the weight being thrown. And then mania? At Sineva, the rate of cast weight is more than 2 times higher. And if we take into account the range at which the rocket will hit Sarmat from any pole and direction, then we get an additional advantage. In my opinion, the benefits are obvious.

    Insufficient range for what? To cover the territory of the USA? The wilted range of 8200-9300 km is not enough? Enough to cover the entire territory of the United States, firing from the pier from both the Northern and the Pacific Fleets.
    The numbers, which, sorry, “walk on the Internet - from the evil one. So you brought the cast weight of“ Sineva. ”Yes, she has (maximum) 2800 kg. But absolutely all publications, electronic or paper, associate this one thrown weight with a missile range. And alas, it’s not so. And the only source where this was not written is a book about the GRZ. There, the Detyar rocket group wrote for the first time that everyone unanimously puts an equal sign between the maximum throwing weight and range. there, EMNIP were given the coefficients of energy-mass perfection for the declared range (again a very crafty figure) and reduced to a range of 10000 km. By simple calculations, we can clearly say that such a load can be carried by a missile at a range of about 6500 km. At a range of 8200 - 1,8 tons, and for 11500 km the missile carries only 2 warheads and has an abandoned weight comparable to that of the Bulava

    Why rocket in a submarine to hit through any pole. Another misunderstanding circulated by our media. They never write anywhere that at the same time the thrown weight falls almost three times and the flight time starts to be calculated not 15-20 minutes, but much larger, close to an hour ... And what is the benefit of such a “delayed strike”?

    Quote: NEXUS
    Vladimir, you don’t have to pretend to be a hose ... a couple of years ago it was announced that the Bulava ICBM would be modernized ... don’t say that you didn’t know that.

    Yeah. This was mainly fun resource LENTA.VRU and the famous Konstantin Sivkov. Moreover, the phrases were almost word for word. But they considered Solomonov to be quoted below their dignity. And Solomon said

    "The life cycle of a weapon is usually from 20 to 30 years. Already, having surrendered to the "Mace", we are working on its modernization. This process is continuous due to the fact that there are fundamentally new design and construction solutions, the meaning of which is to increase the effectiveness of the use of weapons "

    N? Ikto does not say that the "Mace" will not be modernized over time. But talking about a modernized product that has not completed a single launch from a ground stand is beyond understanding. Well, I would understand if they said that they launched the modernized "Mace" from the "Don". It would be at least clear - a test boat. But to put a “modernized” missile that has not passed a single flight test on a warship is beyond reason
    Moreover, the persons voicing the parameters of the “modernized” Mace talk about the cast weight almost twice as large and a range of 12000 km. Not funny. One would like to say such scribblers - LEARN THE MATCH. And read the agreement, not the Murzil

    Quote: NEXUS
    When installing a nuclear reactor, it is possible to double the weight of the casting weight by comparing this figure with Sineva.

    Where do you stick a nuclear reactor with such a tight lineup. And most importantly, why? The reactor must be understood - forward flow. He needs a “flow” of the working fluid, in this case air. The "mace" is SOLID FUEL rocket. What are you going to pass through the reactor zone ????
    In addition, my remark about the 100 Mt charge was sarcasm. Pile another 40-ton load onto a 40-ton rocket. Your engine will have to have a thrust of almost 200-250-300 tons. And this is the other weight, and the dimensions ....
    1. 0
      23 May 2018 14: 15
      Quote: Old26
      And most importantly, why?
      Then, to increase the speed of the expiration of the working fluid. Chemical propellant rocket engines cannot provide a working fluid expiration rate of more than 5km / s, and nuclear fuel rocket engines or rocket engines with energy supply through an energy beam can provide a working fluid expiration speed of more than 5km / s. With such engines, the rocket will pick up speed faster and leave the launch zone faster, where it is easy to intercept while it moves slowly. By the way, can the Petrel be placed in the mine from Sineva on the nuclear submarine of project 667 RBDM KR? Or to the mine from Bulava at the K-535 Yury Dolgoruky APRK project of Borey?
  30. 0
    23 May 2018 11: 43
    Quote: Mestny
    "Magnеtometer "...
    An expert with an engineering background is immediately visible, yes.

    Moreover, the Soviet hardening. I myself scored into the Russian language, believing that I would not need it as a physicist.
  31. 0
    23 May 2018 21: 22
    Quote: Muvka
    So, did you compare the weight of the rocket and the dimensions with the Blue? The mace is a small rocket in itself.

    Everything is relative in this world, the namesake. The main thing is to compare. Compared to the monster-like 90-ton R-39, the Mace is small. Compared with the "Blue" - very close in their performance characteristics. The starting point for Bulava is 36,8, for Sineva - 40,3 tons. The length of the Bulava is 12,1 meters, and the Sineva is 14,8 meters. Diameters are almost the same. The "Mace" - 2 meters, the "Sineva" - 1,9 ....

    Quote: Svetlana
    Then, to increase the speed of the expiration of the working fluid. Chemical propellant rocket engines cannot provide a working fluid expiration rate of more than 5km / s, and nuclear fuel rocket engines or rocket engines with energy supply through an energy beam can provide a working fluid expiration speed of more than 5km / s. With such engines, the rocket will pick up speed faster and leave the launch zone faster, where it is easy to intercept while it moves slowly. By the way, can the Petrel be placed in the mine from Sineva on the nuclear submarine of project 667 RBDM KR? Or to the mine from Bulava at the K-535 Yury Dolgoruky APRK project of Borey?

    And where is the nuclear fuel mentioned in the cruise missile nuclear engine? There, the working fluid is air. Where to add such an engine (nuclear, direct-flow) to the "Mace" do not tell me ????
    The layout of the solid-fuel Mace is as simple as the corner of a house. Here is an approximate layout



    Petrel? No one knows "what it is and what it is eaten with." Some performance characteristics have something in common with Status-6. If the dimensions of the Berevestnik are the same as those of the Status, it will not fit anywhere. There is a length of 24 meters EMNIP, at the mines on the above-mentioned boats - about 15 meters. And why have this product on the strategist? It’s not a weapon of the first strike, it’s like that, when all nuclear weapons are unstuck and our territory and the enemy will be radioactive ruins. And even here it is not clear why? Kill the dead again ???
    1. +1
      24 May 2018 07: 55
      Quote: Old26
      where is nuclear fuel in the cruise missile’s all-nuclear engine?

      The Burevestnik cruise missile engine nuclear reactor is a meter-long metal cylinder with a diameter of 50 centimeters in which the incoming air from the air intake is heated to 2000 degrees and creates the required thrust at the outlet from the reactor. Nuclear fuel at Petrel is located inside the metal cylinder in solid state form. A small-sized nuclear power plant weighs 2 tons. see https://www.fontanka.ru/2018/05/22/090/
      Quote: Old26
      not clear for what?
      to clean up the unfinished war initiators who tried to sit out in underground bunkers. As soon as they try to stick out of the dungeons - and then they have a present on their heads. Also, the Petrel can play the role of a command rocket - a dead hand, because can fly for a long time.