Military Review

Russian debt. They scare us, but we are not afraid!

19
Even in the most favorable scenario for Russia, Western experts are looking for a negative.




On Wednesday, the IMF should publish in Moscow the next forecast for the world and Russian economy. No one is waiting for surprises, there is no fear that they will impose something like mysterious structural reforms on us or, God forbid, a new stage of privatization. It seems that from the IMF forecast, the long-promised 1,7 percent of GDP growth will not go anywhere. And yet, one must think, the experts of the foundation will surely chide Russia at least for something.

And above all, according to Konstantin Vyshkovsky, head of the external debt department of the Russian Ministry of Finance, for an increase in the debt burden on the budget. Which among us, by the way, may finally turn out to be in surplus. Where does an expert have such confidence in expectations? It is possible that from the ratings of leading rating agencies and analysts of Bloomberg published on the eve of the annual performance of IMF specialists.

Fitch and Moody's rating agencies simply did not go into details and kept Russia's debt ratings unchanged. Well, thank you for that, although even according to the current trends, changes in debt obligations are obvious: the country began to occupy more and more not in foreign countries, but in the domestic market, where it is supposedly very bad with potential creditors. Sberbank and VTB do not count: the purchase of state securities from their side is nothing but the transfer of funds from one pocket to another. And both pockets - state.

Russian debt. They scare us, but we are not afraid!


On the other hand, Bloomberg company experts spoke out unexpectedly harshly towards Russia. And precisely because, in their opinion, there is no reason for the Russian authorities to have such large-scale and expensive borrowings (at 7,3 per cent per annum). We do not argue, although the strangeness of the situation, when the country receives additional oil and gas revenues, but is forced to get into debt, is caused, in fact, for purely technical reasons.

More precisely, the whole thing is in the so-called budget rule, which requires the Russian Central Bank to redeem all the currency, which is obtained due to the excess in the oil prices of the key mark in 40 dollars per barrel. The reasons for the rise in prices are not a secret for anyone - this is another extraordinary exacerbation of the situation in the Middle East, specifically around Iran, which with a high degree of probability can be used to reduce the export of black gold.

It would seem that Russia should only win from such a deal. If it were not for one "but." To buy the currency need rubles. And not just a lot, but a lot of rubles. Turning on the printing press and printing them would be a blatant violation of all laws that the current financial authorities themselves once wrote for themselves. You have to ask for a debt. And in debt for rubles, which is still obviously more expensive than in euros or dollars. Although the difference in percentages is not so great at all - 7 with a small percentage of annual interest in Russia versus 3-3,5 percent abroad.

As a result, already in the current fiscal year, according to the estimates of the same Ministry of Finance, borrowing volumes, mainly through OFZ (federal loan bonds) will be a record. At the same time, the issue of sovereign debt securities will be governed by the exchange rate. The fact that, after another portion of American sanctions, this course, contrary to all expectations, did not collapse, but is now growing, is known in Russia even to schoolchildren. Experts on this occasion say something like the following: “Changes in the budget are based on higher assumptions about oil and imply a strengthening of the ruble, and consequently, a revision in the direction of revising the plans for production”. The release plans, as you understand, of those OFZs.

Experts of the Russian Ministry of Finance not for the first time recalculate certain indicators for a particular real or projected exchange rate. According to the latest calculations, every ruble lost by the dollar in the course of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation costs the Ministry of Finance 80-85 billion rubles now. It turns out that, by introducing sanctions, the Americans, in a sense, helped the Russian budget. We were frightened, but we were not scared, and having survived the crisis, we are now actually preparing to experience abundance. Currency abundance, of course.



The recalculation is quite consistent with the new fiscal realities: the money from both the customs and the tax authorities is now receiving much more than could be expected. But the Ministry of Finance has to go into debt. Perhaps that is why the Minister of Finance, and now First Deputy Prime Minister Anton Siluanov, not so long ago came up with a truly "revolutionary" initiative to abolish the 100-percent sale of foreign exchange earnings. After all, a ruble in the state box office may simply not be enough.



In the meantime, the Ministry of Finance has managed to increase its targets for domestic borrowing in 2018 by more than a quarter, and specifically by 28 percent, to 1,04 trillion. rubles (in dollars it is almost 17 billion). From the mouth of First Deputy Prime Minister Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, we learned that if this year prices for Russian oil averaged 54-55 dollars per barrel, purchases of foreign currency will double to more than 2 trillion. rubles. If the price for Urals is about 60 dollars, which we are seeing today, they will soar up to about 2,8 trillion. rubles.

Something like that in Russia was six or seven years ago, when reserve funds began to accumulate at the expense of “extra” oil money. Now, too, there is a real prospect of excess of income over expenditure - according to various estimates, by 350-500 billion rubles, that is, by 0,3-o, 5 percent of GDP. And in order not to go into printing rubles, which is fraught with all possible inflation risks, the government, in fact, is forced to increase the attraction of capital within the country.

However, the fact that the Russian Ministry of Finance sells OFZs within the country does not quite correspond to reality, and does not even correspond at all. More than a third of these securities are bought by American investors. Despite the sanctions and everything related to them. Against such a high yield (sorry for repetition, more than 7 percent per annum), coupled with almost 100-percent reliability, no investor can resist.

It seems to be okay - the United States has been doing just that for over a hundred years. And everything is fine. For many years now, more than half of the notorious American debt is a debt to its own citizens, to American banks and companies. It seems that Russian financial authorities are not ready to make such long-term commitments to “their own”. As they say, that put Jupiter ...

In order to “vparivat” to the population almost a third of the salary with bonds, one must, probably, be the “leader of nations” himself or his people's commissar, and then the minister of finance Arseny Zverev.
Author:
19 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 22 May 2018 06: 13
    +4
    our entire "economy" around the "barrel" jumps, even in the article ... nice
    that oil has risen in price ... true, along with gasoline, but this is the norm for our "economy".
    1. Shurik70
      Shurik70 22 May 2018 07: 24
      +6
      The Russian economy is not dependent on a barrel.
      Gasoline rises in price regardless of barrel jumps.
      tongue
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Sergey-8848
      Sergey-8848 26 May 2018 20: 03
      0
      Eighteenth time
  2. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 22 May 2018 06: 14
    +2
    It would seem that Russia should only gain from this situation. If not for one “but.” Currency is needed to buy rubles. And not just a lot, but a lot of rubles.

    One "BUT!" stop Currency in such quantity, which is bought by (who ???) the devil knows who, and then all this appears in Forbes ratings in Russia is not in demand. Here, within the borders, the bulk of the population costs exactly rubles. Naturally, Maybach or some other Bentley will not be sold for rubles, they will not build a villa in Spain for rubles, a personal Boeing Abramovich will not buy for rubles ... Nobody will sell equipment for rubles, office equipment, electronics ... But who knows? So, stop telling us how difficult it is in Russia without currency for a simple Russian peasant and worker. We fool us through Tajikistan and other fraternal republics ...

    In order to “vparivat” to the population almost a third of the salary with bonds, one must, probably, be the “leader of nations” himself or his people's commissar, and then the minister of finance Arseny Zverev.

    In order to have enough money for everyone, it is necessary to cut the upper level of income. It is much more effective and beneficial for the body. stop Yes ... Something recently, some have become very afraid of the leader of the peoples? Sense of a close end? belay
    1. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 22 May 2018 08: 40
      0
      Well, yes, and still pick up and share ... along the way, "destroying everything to the foundation"
      Stop crashing inside a "single country." I want to wave my saber - there are "export programs"
      For example, there are no "served" territories "beyond the puddle." Go there with the ideas of the International. And most pleased, and in favor of the country.
      Somehow we were too late in defensive defense, it’s time to move on "to battles on foreign territory"
    2. vladimirvn
      vladimirvn 22 May 2018 08: 48
      +2
      Putin is scary, very scary, I'm afraid of him,
      I'm almost used to it, but every time I urinate in my pants.
      I'm stealing wagons like a bee working
      And at the same time I'm afraid of Putin more and more!
      (Song of the Russian Official)
  3. Tartary
    Tartary 22 May 2018 06: 16
    +4
    Quote: - It would seem that Russia should only win from such a deal. If it were not for one "but." To buy the currency need rubles. And not just a lot, but a lot of rubles. Turning on the printing press and printing them would be a blatant violation of all laws that the current financial authorities themselves once wrote for themselves. You have to ask for a debt. And in debt for rubles, which is still obviously more expensive than in euros or dollars. Although the difference in percentages is not so great at all - 7 with a small percentage of annual interest in Russia versus 3-3,5 percent abroad.

    It seemed to me alone that in the quote “oil is oil” or how to mono buy not printed rubles, but borrowed currencies from someone who does not need to be converted into printed rubles? That rye in anticipation of the loss of the last mind ... wink Do not let go crazy - explain who can trick the phrases of the economic guru ... wassat
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 22 May 2018 07: 57
      +3
      Quote: Tartary

      It seemed to me alone that in the quote “oil is oil” or how to mono buy not printed rubles, but borrowed currencies from someone who does not need to be converted into printed rubles? That rye in anticipation of the loss of the last mind ... wink Do not let go crazy - explain who can trick the phrases of the economic guru ... wassat

      The main message is incorrect in the article:
      . Currency is needed to buy rubles. And not just a lot, but a lot of rubles. Turning the printing press on and printing them would be a blatant violation of all laws

      Until now, ruble emissions have come from foreign currency inflows. The Central Bank has never had “its” rubles, but it prints them to buy out the currency that comes from the sale of mainly oil and gas. That is how the new ruble appears, its Central Bank does not occupy anyone.
      1. Vlad.by
        Vlad.by 22 May 2018 08: 42
        0
        Is it the same sarcasm as the author of the article?
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 22 May 2018 09: 26
          +5
          Quote: Vlad.by
          Is it the same sarcasm as the author of the article?

          No sarcasm, everything is extremely serious!))
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 22 May 2018 07: 08
    0
    Changes in the "fiscal rule" and cannot continuously monitor changes in market conditions. It was introduced to stabilize the course. It is possible to change this rule, or to cancel 100% of the sale of foreign exchange earnings (if such a law exists). In any case, scaring the population with disaster is superfluous. Using the most "base" tricks ... The population wants to work and live. Worthy.
  5. Stils
    Stils 22 May 2018 09: 28
    0
    Quote: Tartary
    Quote: - It would seem that Russia should only win from such a deal. If it were not for one "but." To buy the currency need rubles. And not just a lot, but a lot of rubles. Turning on the printing press and printing them would be a blatant violation of all laws that the current financial authorities themselves once wrote for themselves. You have to ask for a debt. And in debt for rubles, which is still obviously more expensive than in euros or dollars. Although the difference in percentages is not so great at all - 7 with a small percentage of annual interest in Russia versus 3-3,5 percent abroad.

    It seemed to me alone that in the quote “oil is oil” or how to mono buy not printed rubles, but borrowed currencies from someone who does not need to be converted into printed rubles? That rye in anticipation of the loss of the last mind ... wink Do not let go crazy - explain who can trick the phrases of the economic guru ... wassat

    In theory, everything is "just")) ....
    The state issues ruble-denominated OFZs and throws out to the market obligations to pay roughly 7 percent per annum, i.e. borrows under 7. With this money he buys currency and puts it in a capsule. But the problem for the state is, as the author of the article points out, debt costs money, and the state does not want to pay, so our state debt is so small, the state is afraid of borrowing a lot of money from the people.
    By the way, if they hadn’t bought the bucks now, I think we would have seen 40 rubles per dollar, in which place our economy would have been in this situation, I think clearly.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  6. reminin
    reminin 22 May 2018 12: 59
    0
    For a long time, the Central Bank has not bought currency directly from oil exporters at a fixed rate. Transactions go through the international currency exchange. In order for oil exporters to be able to sell their dollars on the exchange for rubles, rubles must be sold there. There are no rubles on the exchange - the ruble is strengthening. So the Central Bank has to sell rubles on the exchange so that the ruble does not strengthen. And the Central Bank will print these rubles and throw them off to the exchange in the volumes requested by the exchange. In exchange for the "printed from the air" rubles, the Central Bank buys real gold, "printed from the air" dollars and "promises from the United States for a brighter future" in securities.
    The budget law is not applicable here because extra rubles do not go into the Russian economy, but accumulate in the form of a noble metal in the country's foreign exchange reserves.
  7. cradle
    cradle 22 May 2018 15: 26
    0
    Quote: The_X_Factor
    Have you already managed to get offended? Well, sorry.

    you have iterations
  8. Passing by
    Passing by 22 May 2018 16: 02
    +1
    , and faith doesn’t give you to buy technology so as not to get into debt? Or do we not need our own production, is it better to save other people's candy wrappers?
  9. Alexy
    Alexy 22 May 2018 16: 18
    0
    Bullshit of a pseudo-expert. Nothing more to say
  10. Efrem mutny
    Efrem mutny 22 May 2018 17: 06
    0
    All is well, but shitty ... wassat
  11. Drlivsi
    Drlivsi 22 May 2018 21: 23
    0
    And what does Comrade Kudrin think about this? Probably still raise the retirement age? Well, let's say up to 70 ...
  12. Apollo
    Apollo 24 May 2018 21: 42
    0
    Only fools and those who have nothing to lose are not afraid. Both of these are the majority in Russia.