Threat to videoconferencing: How the old F-15 will destroy the newest Su-57

68
In publications devoted to the comparison of various military equipment, usually it is only about samples of the same class and one time. However, in real combat, planes can literally collide from different eras, and similar battles should also be considered when drawing up tactics and strategies. Given this, the American edition of The National Interest a few days ago tried to predict the outcome of the battle with the participation of the newest Russian fighter with far from the newest model from the US air force.

18 May Edition has published a curious article “How an Old F-15 Just-A-1 in the Dogfight” - “How the old F-57 could destroy the latest Russian Su-15 in melee” by Dave Majumdar . The publication was attributed to the headings of The Buzz and Security, as well as to the section of the European region.



The article begins with a reminder of the successes and merits of one of the compared samples. D. Majumdar calls the Boeing F-15C Eagle the greatest fighter of air superiority. During its service, this aircraft set an important record: the machines of this type shot down the 104 of the enemy aircraft, but none of them were lost in battle. However, most likely, the service of such aircraft is nearing its end. Despite this, the F-15C fighter jets are still a formidable force.



The United States Air Force is planning a new upgrade of existing Eagle aircraft, including the installation of modern radio electronic systems. However, until the warlords decided when such a modernization would begin. Now they are trying to determine whether to continue spending money on restoring an outdated glider. According to the Air Force, the existing F-15C needs serious repair and updating of the airframe, with which they will be able to remain in the ranks until the mid-twenties.

Also affect the situation of financial problems. Congress refused to allow the air force to write off the existing A-10C attack aircraft. For this reason, the command of the Air Force remains a small choice in terms of the release of finance. Perhaps the only way out is the abandonment of the Eagle aircraft. At the same time, modern F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft will remain in service for as long as possible.

The United States Air Force in the past received less than half of the desired number of the newest fighters Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor. As a result, about half of the fleet of air superiority fighter jets are relatively old F-15C aircraft. In the distant future, it is planned to create a new fighter, for which work is being carried out under the Penetrating Counter Air program. In the thirties, such aircraft will begin to replace both the old F-15 and the newer F-22A. Russia and China, in turn, are currently developing promising fifth-generation fighter aircraft, such as the Su-57 PAK-FA from the Sukhoi company.

D. Majumdarr indicates that the newest Russian Su-57 aircraft - especially after the installation of the so-called. engines of the second stage - will be the most serious threat to any fourth-generation fighter. The advantages of the Su-57 will be speed, maneuverability, invisibility and potential in terms of electronic warfare. Nevertheless, as the author of The National Interest believes, the United States has ideas to counter Russian technology. Moreover, the process of their implementation has already been launched.

The response to current threats is in the infrared part of the spectrum and concerns waves with a long length. In foreign terminology, this part of the spectrum is designated as the Long-wavelength infrared. It includes waves with a length from 8 to 15 microns. Modern low-profile aircraft can counteract the means of observation of different classes, but this part of the spectrum still remains undeveloped. At the moment, there are no developments or ideas to prevent the detection of an aircraft at large distances using long-wave infrared radiation detectors. In any case, such facilities cannot be installed on existing aerial platforms.

The author does not exclude that in the future the designers of a particular country will be able to find ways to hide the long-wavelength part of the infrared range. Nevertheless, in all likelihood, their implementation will require the development of an entirely new airframe, initially adapted to the use of such technologies.

Currently, Lockheed Martin is developing a Legion Pod suspension container with new detection tools for use on F-15C fighters. The equipment of this container will be based on the detection of the long-wave infrared spectrum. According to the company's development plans, 130 Legion Pod containers equipped with an IRST21 type detection system and improved data processing facilities will be released. It is assumed that such equipment will allow aircraft to work more efficiently in a difficult jamming environment.

The development of the Legion Pod project is nearing completion. American companies aviation Industries expect a serial production contract for new systems to appear later this year.

D. Majumdar cites statements from Paul Lemmo, Vice-President of Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. Last year, commenting on the Legion Pod project, he argued that with the rapid delivery of the required number of serial products and high detection performance, the new development would expand the capabilities of combat aircraft. First of all, the potential in the area of ​​so-called will increase. passive attacks.

Also, a representative of the company-developer noted the success in cooperation with contractors. He recalled a long-term partnership with Boeing, which is now engaged in the development of the F-15 and F / A-18 aircraft. It is expected that, thanks to the established cooperation, it will be possible to fulfill the order of the US Air Force for the supply of serial Legion Pod containers in a timely manner.

In the context of the new special container project, The National Interest recalled its conversations with representatives of the US Navy and the defense industry. They said that a container with long-wavelength infrared detectors combined with modern means of control and data transfer will allow you to effectively search and find stealth aircraft. Several aircraft with special equipment can not only find such targets, but also exchange data, specifying the route of the object. One representative of the naval sphere indicated that a similar method is being considered. fleet as the main one in the context of the struggle against stealth aircraft of a probable enemy.

D. Majumdar believes that the F-15C fighter with the Legion Pod outboard container eliminates the advantage of the Su-57 aircraft in the form of reduced visibility for radar vehicles. As soon as the American Eagle detects the Su-57 using infrared detectors, it will be able to connect the extremely powerful AN / APG-63 (V) 3 radar using active phased antenna array to work. Through the use of two detection systems, the Eagle will be able to determine the target route suitable for the use of existing weapons. Further, he will have to launch AIM-120D AMRAAM air-to-air missiles.

Further, in the battle, according to the American author, the situation will not be the best for the F-15C. If they fail to shoot down the Su-57 at a long distance, then the advantage in the battle goes to the Russian aircraft. In close combat Su-57 will be able to use the most important advantage in the form of high maneuverability. However, this advantage is not unambiguous. D. Majumdar recalls the numerous training battles with the participation of the old F-15C and the newest F-22A fighters. The latter are characterized by increased maneuverability, however, some “dog dumps” end in victory for the older F-15C.

In addition, the recent upgrading of the F-15C, involving the use of an assistive target designation system and supplementing the AIM-9X Sidewinder missile weapon system, increases the aircraft's potential. The possibility of shooting in the direction of the pilot's gaze - just like the Russian Su-57 - increasingly leads to the fact that the battles between the F-15C and F-22A end with the mutual conditional destruction of both participants.

The author of The National Interest believes that the F-15C aircraft should be left in operation and not removed from service for as long as possible. However, such disposal of equipment leads to the cost of maintenance and the need for major repairs. In addition, if you take into account the age of the aircraft and the ever-changing threats, it would be more reasonable to invest in the technology of new generations; first of all - in the program Penetrating Counter Air. The emergence of such decisions, among other things, contributes to the refusal of Congress to write off the aircraft A-10C.

Considering the potential of the F-15C Eagle aircraft in its current form and after the appearance of new models of special equipment, Dave Majumdar makes the most important conclusion. The air force must evolve, and the time of the F-15C aircraft seems to be ending soon.

***

It is easy to see that the topic of the recent article “How to Old F-15 Just Millant Kill Our New Years' Su-57 in a 'Dogfight'” was not only a comparison of the newest Russian aircraft with the American “old man”. Among other things, it was devoted to ways of upgrading existing F-15C aircraft in order to obtain the highest possible technical characteristics and combat qualities. If in the case of the technical readiness of the aircraft, it is possible to do only with a major overhaul, then to expand the combat capabilities, taking into account modern threats, completely new equipment is required.

As a result, one of the “main characters” of the article was the promising suspended container Legion Pod, equipped with infrared sensors. In its present form, this container is a product with a cylindrical body, equipped with a head and tail fairing. Container length - 750 mm, diameter - a little more than 400 mm. Weight - 250 kg. Used standard means of fastening on the plane with an electronic interface for data exchange.

According to Lockheed Martin, the container has a modern optical-electronic system IRTS21, capable of detecting infrared radiation from any aircraft. In this case, the product does not impersonate itself by any of its own radiation, and is not afraid of electronic warfare systems. It is expected that the presence of such a detection tool will sharply raise the combat potential of both the old F-15C and, in the long term, newer vehicles.

The contract for mass production of the Legion Pod will be signed this year, and soon the Lockheed Martin plant in the city of Orlando (pieces of Florida) will transfer the first products to the customer. By 2020, it is planned to ship 130 containers. The project will create new jobs 50. All product components are manufactured in the United States.

One of the main goals of the Legion Pod project is to extend the life of existing aircraft while maintaining acceptable fighting qualities. However, as the author of The National Interest rightly notes, the time of the F-15C fighters - despite all their merits - is coming to an end.

As for the opposition of the outdated F-15C and the newest Russian Su-57, then in this case it all comes down to mental experiments. It is impossible to deny the fact that the old Eagle aircraft with new means of detection and modern weapons can be a noticeable threat and pose a certain danger even for promising fighters. However, an increase in performance in a couple of areas will not exactly make an obsolete fourth-generation machine a serious competitor to an aircraft belonging to the fifth. And the age of one of the compared aircraft already does not allow to seriously consider the events of the distant future. The F-15C time is coming to an end, and the Su-57 era is just beginning.

The article "How to Old F-15 Just Might Kill the New Life Su-57 in a 'Dogfight'":
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/how-old-f-15-just-might-kill-russias-new-stealth-su-57-25893
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    22 May 2018 05: 52
    They didn’t lose a single plane in the battle .. A joke remembered about this ... Grandfather complains to the doctor ... my peer boasts that twice a week ... And the doctor responds to him ... And whoever bothers you also boasts. ..
    1. +13
      22 May 2018 06: 04
      Majumdar’s fantasies, you can not read, do not clog the brain.
      1. +6
        22 May 2018 06: 24
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Majumdar’s fantasies, you can not read, do not clog the brain.

        That's right.
      2. +16
        22 May 2018 06: 26
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Majumdar’s fantasies, you can not read, do not clog the brain.

        Russian media are probably the only ones who quote NI. They themselves created and they themselves are discussing the conversation of a madman with a mirror ...
      3. 0
        22 May 2018 12: 41
        You can not read, but no one forbids clogging the information space.
      4. +4
        22 May 2018 15: 28
        I think the F-15 is the only real chance to shoot down the Su-57 if D. Majumdar himself is at the helm ...
    2. +1
      22 May 2018 06: 22
      Quote: Vard
      We didn’t lose a single plane in battle .. I remembered a joke about this ...

      A joke about the elusive Joe?
      1. +2
        22 May 2018 22: 27
        The length of the container is 750 mm, the diameter is a little over 400 mm. Weight - 250 kg.

        That is 75 cm by 40 cm and all this weighing 250 kg?
        It seems to me alone that something is wrong with the numbers or are there still people with the same opinion?
        1. +2
          23 May 2018 14: 17
          Monolithic concrete, not otherwise
  2. +11
    22 May 2018 06: 43
    The Su-57 is an aircraft that is not mass-produced, and what it will be like in real combat is not known. Moreover, the United States has a huge superiority in the number of aircraft, and no one will fight one-on-one. F21 will fail. And the F-35 is not old, it will survive the F-15, in China the SU-22 still flies and nothing, not the old, but our dodiki sawed them.

    1. +15
      22 May 2018 08: 45
      I understand that the knowledge is tight, but the Su-15 was used exclusively by the USSR air defense and was not exported at all. And he could not get to China simply because relations with China were severed even before the Su-15 appeared.

      And China still has a tight production of aircraft, so they use a bunch of scrap metal, since they don’t have to fight with Russia, and neighbors, except India, are absolutely incomparable, either numerically or technically.

      In the picture, J-8, descending from J-7, the Chinese MiG-21. Moreover, one of the later options, the early ones had a layout, like the MiG-21 with a nasal air intake. Likewise, they made a Q-19 flywheel from the MiG-5, which does not look like an ancestor from the word at all. The "chopped with an ax" layout in the style of the MiG-23 and Su-15 is generally typical of the 70s, and the lateral rectangular air intakes themselves are best suited for an interceptor firing rockets at supersonic speeds.
      1. +1
        22 May 2018 10: 23
        Quote: EvilLion
        Su-15 was used exclusively by the USSR air defense and was not exported at all. And he could not get to China simply because relations with China were severed even before the Su-15 appeared.

        It must be added that the Su-15 became hopelessly outdated many decades ago. It had very miserable performance characteristics, even in comparison with the MiG-23, also armed with air defense, and also long ago removed from service.
        1. +1
          22 May 2018 14: 56
          In terms of range, things are bad just for the MiG-23. As for the radar I will not say anything, but for max. the speed, which is very critical for the interceptor parameter for the Su-15 compared to the MiG-23, everything is really sad, as I wrote below, the possibility of TTX growth without moving to more advanced aerodynamic schemes or at least KIS, like the MiG-23, for the Su- 15 exhausted. Rested on take-off and landing characteristics. Although the F-4 EMNIP accelerated to 2400, because he, the brainchild of the fleet, also came to the Air Force, but in the United States in those years the technical level was much higher.
    2. +2
      22 May 2018 08: 56
      This is a Chinese J-8. Further development of the J-7, i.e. Mig-21. There is practically nothing left of the ancestor. As for the Su-15, they did not export it and it did not fly to China.
      And so - yes, it looks like.
      1. 0
        23 May 2018 04: 14
        As for the similarity, you can add: the aerodynamic design of the Chinese fighter is close to the MIG-23 and to the American F-4 with a deltoid wing from the SU-15.
    3. +6
      22 May 2018 09: 15
      And yes, if you compare the MiG-29, of the 1982 year with the 2x8300 kg thrust on the afterburner and J-8C of the 1993 year with the 2x7500 kg thrust with empty masses 10.8 and 10.2 t, respectively, then the picture is already sad for the Chinese, but the MiG-29 also has a supporting fuselage, which critically reduces the required wing area, and hence drag. Moreover, the Su-15 level machines simply chose the possibility of building up the LTX at their aerodynamic level, the landing speed of the Su-15 270-300 km / h is a record figure, the pilots will beat too often already. Tightened to the fullest. That is, a smaller wing, which means you can’t simply do better on them, you need either a new tech. move the level in aerodynamics (which was done in the mature 4 generation), or make crutches like the wing of variable sweep, as was the case with the early machines of the 4 generation and MiG-23 (Tu-160 and B-1B are already a completely different category with other priorities and tolerances, but for a fighter it’s precisely a crutch in which there is nothing good). That is, in practice, the J-8 is likely to encounter difficulties in trying to intercept the same MiG-29, and in the case of a battle, the MiG-29 will have greater freedom both in imposing a battle and leaving it, and in maneuverability, he has much more thrust.

      And so yes, why do something new, because you can shoot Leo-34 from the T-85-2. On board. If you drive up unnoticed.
    4. 0
      22 May 2018 15: 03
      Su-57 is an aircraft that is not mass-produced, and what it will be like in real combat is unknown


      This is unknown to you, but nothing prevents our Air Force from conducting PvP against Su-27, at least against Su-35. And, most likely, they did more than once, just do not yell about 100: 1 accounts. 60: 40 versus Su-35, the most advanced production aircraft in the world at the moment, will already be a good indicator confirming the prospects. Yes, and those. no one will disclose techniques to counter stealth machines.
  3. +2
    22 May 2018 06: 47
    It is clear that in melee combat, you can shoot down any ultra-duper cool plane even with a burst of IL-2 cannons or destroy the cool Abrams just by shooting him with the T-34-85 tank in the stern and causing a fire (in Iraq, even from Zu 23 they managed to burn out) The meaning of the newest weapons in that they will not even let the enemy approach effective fire (the same Su-57 will shoot the old F-15 before he just sees him (for this there is a radar with a range of 400 km and air-to-air missiles with a range of 300 km ( the most long-range American only 175km)
    1. mvg
      -1
      14 August 2018 22: 48
      for this there is a radar with a range of 400 km and air-to-air missiles with a range of 300 km (the most long-range American only 175 km)

      Tell me, do you really believe in what you wrote? Or is education? Along the way, one fat Frenchman from the movie "Unlucky" is your idol.
  4. +7
    22 May 2018 07: 05
    Majumdara brought a fresh batch of ganjubas from their historical homeland. We are waiting for enchanting revelations over the course of several weeks: about the confrontation between Zamvolt and Varshavyanka, Bradley and Uranus-9 and something else like that.
  5. 0
    22 May 2018 07: 12
    The author of the article encroached on the holy American prodigy - on the notorious "stealth" ... And is he not afraid of intrigues?
  6. +2
    22 May 2018 08: 21
    I read that the Jews had losses, but they do not advertise them.
    1. +4
      24 May 2018 10: 18
      "but not one of them was lost in battle" ///

      Syrian pilot planted a rocket from the engine nozzle from a 5 km
      Israeli F-15 and reasonably recorded a victory for himself.
      But the pilot reached the base. The aircraft has been under repair for more than 2 years.
      Both engines replaced him. But they returned to the system.
      And he was shown to the Americans at the general "Israeli Aviation Review"
      after the 1982 war with Syria. The Americans did not believe that
      Israeli F-15 and F-16 did not suffer losses and came to check.
      1. mvg
        -1
        14 August 2018 22: 53
        But they returned to the system.

        Considering your secondary market, the Columbia Space Shuttle could be repaired in 2 years. Not just Needle. Not an indicator when an amount is invested in repairs, at least equal to a new airplane. Only as a political (advertising) will.
  7. +1
    22 May 2018 08: 31
    One could immediately guess who the author is.
  8. +7
    22 May 2018 08: 57
    hi Currently, Lockheed Martin is developing a Legion Pod suspension container with new detection tools ... One of the main goals of the Legion Pod project is to extend the life of existing aircraft while maintaining acceptable combat qualities ...

    ... maneuverability and range in minus negative
    1. +1
      22 May 2018 14: 59
      and has nothing to do with aerial combat.
  9. +5
    22 May 2018 09: 28
    Here, another thing is interesting - well, the Legion POD, or rather the IRST-21 IR camera, will be a danger to Russian and Chinese stealth. And the author did not think that a similar Russian or Chinese product would pose a much greater threat to the F-22 and F-35? (And the Chinese will find a way to pull and play)
    1. +1
      22 May 2018 10: 06
      Quote: sivuch
      Here, another thing is interesting - well, the Legion POD, or rather the IRST-21 IR camera, will be a danger to Russian and Chinese stealth. And the author did not think that a similar Russian or Chinese product would pose a much greater threat to the F-22 and F-35? (And the Chinese will find a way to pull and play)

      Please list the reasons why "a similar Russian or Chinese product will pose a much greater threat to the F-22 and F-35" feel
      1. +4
        22 May 2018 10: 48
        And I thought that, and so it is clear. In fact, the author writes that all stealth-made planes will be quite visible to themselves in the IR range and this will not be treated. Moreover, if the Su-57 over the next 10 years will be only an addition to the aircraft of generations 4 and 4+, then for F -35 this is already critical. It turns out that any aircraft not only the 4th, but also the 3rd generation will be able to detect stealth over tens of kilometers.
        1. 0
          22 May 2018 12: 49
          Quote: sivuch
          And I thought that, and so it is clear. In fact, the author writes that all stealth-made planes will be quite visible to themselves in the IR range and this will not be treated. Moreover, if the Su-57 over the next 10 years will be only an addition to the aircraft of generations 4 and 4+, then for F -35 this is already critical. It turns out that any aircraft not only the 4th, but also the 3rd generation will be able to detect stealth over tens of kilometers.

          No, it’s not clear. The question is how “a similar Russian or Chinese product will pose a much greater threat to the F-22 and F-35” (similar to the IRST-21 IR camera) given that the infrared signature of the F-22 strip nozzles with cooling is lower than any Russian and Chinese stealth. Just don’t say that our IR matrices are the best in the world and have “no analogues”
          1. +7
            22 May 2018 13: 24
            It is incomprehensible because you do not want to understand.
            Firstly, where did you get that this, i.e. legion under, and similar systems only catch the signature from the nozzles? Many times it was repeated that the difference in the detection range in the faculty is less than one and a half times smaller. In the article (this one - Airborne IRST properties and performance), in my opinion, it is written quite intelligibly. Secondly, the vast majority of 5th generation aircraft will be penguins and for some reason you modestly ignored that they have no flat nozzles and are not expected. Moreover, they will be the shock machines.
            1. +1
              22 May 2018 14: 43
              Quote: sivuch
              It is incomprehensible because you do not want to understand.
              Firstly, where did you get that this, i.e. legion under, and similar systems only catch the signature from the nozzles? Many times it was repeated that the difference in the detection range in the faculty is less than one and a half times smaller. In the article (this one - Airborne IRST properties and performance), in my opinion, it is written quite intelligibly. Secondly, the vast majority of 5th generation aircraft will be penguins and for some reason you modestly ignored that they have no flat nozzles and are not expected. Moreover, they will be the shock machines.

              In fact, penguins have an infrared glider signature lower than the same F-22.
              1. +1
                22 May 2018 14: 57
                Who would argue, but you wrote about the crucial role of flat nozzles.
  10. 0
    22 May 2018 09: 35
    What prevents the J-7 from the OLS to destroy the F-22? with the J-7, it can wait on the ground when the F-22 approaches and then take off with a short take-off with accelerators or from a springboard.
    Pete one F-22 cost a dozen J-7.
  11. +2
    22 May 2018 10: 31
    All these comparisons are utter nonsense by observers; they scribble articles and earn denyushki. The real combat properties of an aircraft can only be checked in field tests or in real hostilities, and no one will disclose these data. Therefore, comparing the advertising (open) data on the performance characteristics of aircraft and their weapons, a large field opens up for the imagination of observers, a lot of money can be earned.
  12. +1
    22 May 2018 10: 44
    “How the old F-15 will be able to destroy the newest Russian Su-57 in close combat” by Dave Majumdar.

    I did not read further.
    1. 0
      22 May 2018 11: 00
      And rightly so. Here they write on the case, albeit in bourgeois
      Airborne IRST properties and performance
      https://defenseissues.net/2015/06/16/airborne-irs
      t-properties-and-performance /
  13. +1
    22 May 2018 10: 50
    Read this nonsense until the end of the patience was not enough! Well, bullshit in a beautiful wrapper.
  14. +3
    22 May 2018 11: 57
    “How the old F-15 will be able to destroy the newest Russian Su-57 in close combat” by Dave Majumdar. I did not read further) Comments are more interesting)))
    1. +1
      22 May 2018 18: 56
      Yes, the comments are much more interesting. and the little article, it’s also designed for the Myrykan people,
  15. 0
    22 May 2018 12: 45
    And who said that they will fight one on one? Where will it be?
  16. 0
    22 May 2018 13: 27
    Whatever the child is amusing, if only she does not become pregnant.
  17. +1
    22 May 2018 15: 10
    Unlike National Interest analysts, including former US Secretary of Defense and former US foreign intelligence chief James Schlesinger, strategic arms expert Graham Allison and American political scientist, professor at the University of Chicago, foreign affairs specialist John Mirseimer, VO website analysts are “dummies” "like Ryabov. Let me remind you that the" teapot "is an ignoramus or a novice specialist in any business. Therefore, the game goes in one goal.
    A feature of arms reviews at NI is not just a technical assessment of weapons, not “feeding hamsters” and “uriapatriots,” but a critical assessment of advertising statements by weapons suppliers, an assessment of the military-political significance of a given weapon and its ability to be used in a real military conflict, and political consequences such an application. Accordingly, the analysis of National Interest publications should be carried out by professionals of equal caliber, and not by inexperienced users of personal computers:
    Moreover, the article deals with the confrontation of an aircraft that was put into operation in 1976 against an aircraft that is simply not in operation yet.
    1. +2
      23 May 2018 23: 47
      I apologize impudently and shamelessly advertise an American resource on a Russian resource. In this case, you clearly lower the level of authors of VO. Have you already paid money to the cash desk for advertising?
  18. +1
    22 May 2018 19: 30
    An article from the series about the Su-35S and F-22 ... we need money to upgrade the F-15.
  19. BAI
    +2
    23 May 2018 13: 32
    How the old F-15 will destroy the newest Su-57

    There can always be a situation where any plane can be shot down from a slingshot.
    Me-109 can shoot down the Su-57 on take-off, and destroy it on the ground - even more so.
  20. +2
    24 May 2018 07: 11
    This Jumdar is an impassable "GO from here!" Even if we take for granted these 104 aircraft allegedly shot down by the American trough, then for one hundred percent these were aircraft that were fifty years old! There are no others with whom the Americans fought!
  21. +1
    24 May 2018 10: 06
    Threat to videoconferencing: How the old F-15 will destroy the newest Su-57
    wassat
    If only on top it falls on standing at the airport ...
  22. 0
    24 May 2018 10: 10
    "Lockheed Martin is developing the Legion Pod hanging container with new detection tools" ///

    They simply pulled out part of the filling from the F-35 fuselage and placed it in a hanging container for the F-15.
  23. 0
    24 May 2018 14: 36
    Quote: Magic Archer
    I read that the Jews had losses, but they do not advertise them.

    Please let us read and a reference please!
  24. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      24 May 2018 17: 07
      I did not understand that someone is trying to compare the Israeli Air Force with the Russian Air Force? Come to your senses and equate with your own kind, otherwise you will have to compare the F-15 with the Su-30 or Su-35, and this is clearly not in favor of the F-15, and there is also the MiG-31BM. F-35 has not shown itself in any way, except for any info-throws, it is quite possible that it will not show, and no one knows specifically about the Su-57, so keep your comparisons with you. You can sing your Hohlak songs under your covers and enjoy your victories.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. +1
    25 May 2018 01: 43
    One thing amuses me: when the Americans with the Su-15 received from Ukraine sparred f27, Sushka won 10 out of 10 fights, and why now the Su-57, which surpassed its predecessor in everything, will lose f15? The speed of the Su-57 has become more than 200 km h, the EPR was 15 times lower due to engines with deflectable nozzles, maneuverability even more increased, in addition, the Su-57 will receive air-to-air missiles which no one in the world has, with a range of up to 400 km! Yes, he and the Raptor can fight on equal terms, not to mention any trash in the form of f15.
    1. AIR
      0
      26 May 2018 23: 52
      In my opinion, Americans just need to protect and prolong the life of such types of aircraft as F-14, 15, 16, 18. These are perhaps the only aircraft that are not junk. Everything modern like Raptor and so on. Invisibility is rubbish, expensive rubbish, very expensive in operation and combat use. I’m just an opponent of these aircraft, but I know and understand that including the F-15, it’s still a very good aircraft. If they can bring this infrared container to life, they will be able to bring a lot of trouble to our, and even more so, Chinese aircraft. Plus, with a deviation from the subject, these aircraft work perfectly on ground targets. They shoot and bomb effectively. Well, returning to aerial combat, they are quite capable of leading an effective effect on enemy aircraft. Say the French Mirages and other Eurofighters, not better, and sometimes worse than these old but reliable F-15s. Regarding our Su-57, I will not say, it is likely that in long-range aerial combat, the F-15 may hate our aircraft, but in the near it will be able to stretch itself.
      1. -1
        27 May 2018 02: 58
        In the near one, in theory and in a queue of IL-2 raptors, you can shoot down a raptor (just who will let it go?) And as for the beautiful deck f-14 (my favorite Amer is a cold guy), it has long been disarmed and in fact for its time attack 6 targets and to have rockets with a range of 175 km was super (he wouldn’t lose to anyone other than the MiG-31 with an even longer-range missile in long-range aerial combat) I honestly don’t know why f14 was removed (Iran still exploits it, dismantling the old ones for parts to maintain the readiness of the rest )
  27. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      25 May 2018 12: 37
      And how many combat-ready aircraft in the Israeli Air Force can you tell? And what other types besides tactical fighters are there? It’s certainly patriotic to put the Israeli Air Force in 4th place in the world, but you need to know the measure, doesn’t it?
      1. +1
        25 May 2018 12: 51
        IDF Air Force Commander General Amikam Norkin May 22 reported on the use of F-35 fighter-bombers to attack targets in the Middle East. Thus, Israel became the first state in the world to use this type of military aircraft.

        Norkin made this statement at a conference in Herzliya,



        where the Air Force commanders from more than 20 countries of the world gathered, including the USA, Austria, Italy, Bulgaria, Belgium, Brazil, Germany, India, Vietnam, Canada, France, Croatia, Great Britain.
        Read the last paragraph. These 20 are not against our Vedas. roles, but VO representatives on the Russian side strongly object.
        1. 0
          25 May 2018 15: 24
          Quote: Shahno
          These 20 are not against our Vedas. roles, but VO representatives on the Russian side strongly object.

          This is not for everyone.
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. 0
    25 May 2018 20: 58
    Whip, and we will listen, take a closer look and draw conclusions.
  30. 0
    26 May 2018 21: 10
    praises forward ...... German asses also came with hundreds shot down across Europe .... planes .... to the USSR ..... But to every ass .... we’ll find (an organ for reproduction) on the left threaded ....
  31. +2
    27 May 2018 21: 35
    These F-15s and F-16s could not defeat the Indian SU-29s at the joint exercises of the USA and India, when out of 10 air training battles the Americans lost all 10, and when they tried to take revenge, already in the USA, using targeting planes and it was only for the Americans, anyway the score was 9-1 in favor of the Indians, so where can they compare with our SU-57. The Americans in any competition lose not only to ours, but also to their NATO allies, in the tank biathlon arranged by NATO countries, like ours, the Americans did not even enter the top three, and the best army in the world is considered, they are the strongest only in Hollywood, in American films.
    1. 0
      29 May 2018 18: 52
      “Su-29” piston with a speed of 500km / h could not win? You drive!
  32. 0
    29 May 2018 18: 49
    “and the era of the Su-57 is just beginning.” .... I did not understand what the article was about? Su-57 is not present ... prototype ... the engines are not worked out, the armament is not ready .... When the era begins ... then compare .... The Chinese are completely stamping the 5th generation .... you can to say that they are worse? It’s impossible, because our generation 5 is simply not in fact yet
    1. 0
      3 June 2018 21: 31
      The problem of personnel. It’s like with the S-500 or MS-21 or the superjet 100/150. Or launches from the East.
  33. 0
    3 June 2018 21: 30
    Finally, the idea is interesting. Here's an example of coverage like a submarine. Piezo absorbing coating. Imitating a flock of birds, and giving the output waves and noise like birds on radar. Current line of sight.
    They do not have such current. And radars can be darned, what kind of current is from them. The logic of analysis and decision making is important.
  34. +1
    6 June 2018 09: 43
    Once again they posted the “Onolitega” Mujamarqi nonsense ... Well, as much as you can already ... Of it, the weapons specialist is like a bullet from known material !!! belay
  35. +1
    7 June 2018 17: 35
    F-15 with a container on an external sling will have an ESR of about 5 meters. It will be discovered at a distance of 250 km and destroyed ...
  36. 0
    7 July 2018 11: 12
    ,, The answer to the current threats lies in the infrared part of the spectrum and concerns waves with a long length. In foreign terminology, this part of the spectrum is referred to as Long-wavelength infrared. Waves from 8 to 15 microns in length belong to it. ,, - But does 8-15 microns refer to the long-wave infrared spectrum?
    And indicators or sensors (passive) of movement to turn on the light or lighting in the porches, work and react in the area of ​​5-10 microns and this is a person.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"