To fight Iran. The United States will form a new coalition

37
Washington will persistently seek the formation of a new broad coalition to fight the current Iranian regime, reports RIA News State Department spokesman Heather Nauert.





The United States will work hard to form a coalition - not a coalition against the IG (terrorist group Islamic State banned in the Russian Federation) - from many countries with the specific purpose of examining the actions of the Iranian regime through a more realistic prism: not only through the lens of the Iranian deal , and through the lens of all its destabilizing actions,
said Nauert during the regular briefing.

At the same time, the representative of the State Department drew attention to the fact that “it is a question of forming a non-Iranian coalition”. The activities of the association will be directed “against the Iranian regime and its actions, and not against the people of Iran,” she explained.

On the question of which countries in this union have already agreed to enter, Nauert did not answer.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    18 May 2018 13: 09
    Washington will work hard to form a new broad coalition to fight the current Iranian regime
    -----------------------------
    Times pass, but the essence does not change. Entente, Triple Alliance, Axis Berlin-Rome-Tokyo, NATO, anti-some kind of coalition against Iraq, against Libya, against Syria, against Iran.
    1. +10
      18 May 2018 13: 12
      Iran urgently needs nuclear weapons. And it will end like with Libya.
      1. +1
        18 May 2018 13: 17
        Unfortunately, Iran will not have time to acquire nuclear weapons .....
        1. +2
          18 May 2018 16: 05
          They decided to "make happy" the Iranian people by replacing the regime. The people, of course, were not asked. What for? “Exceptional” everyone has already decided for everyone.
      2. +3
        18 May 2018 14: 03
        Quote: Geisenberg
        Iran urgently needs nuclear weapons.

        Well, how are you, okay? Who else has atomic weapons. Hazball or the IRGC. With all the dislike for the United States, we only have atomic explosions;
      3. +2
        18 May 2018 17: 38
        This is a rare case when the interests of America and Russia coincide. Objectively, after Assad’s Victory in the Civil War, Iran is Iran’s rival for influence in Syria. Iran wants to turn Syria into its foremost outpost for a war with Israel. Russia needs peace in Syria and military bases. Therefore, the interests of Russia and Iran do not coincide. In addition, Russia benefits from sanctions on Iranian oil, this will maintain high oil prices
        1. 0
          20 May 2018 18: 20
          I agree about the peace in Syria, no about the price tag for oil. It will be beneficial in the short term, six months maximum. Jumps - the Americans will re-open shale mining, again down. More likely it is more profitable to the Americans.
          1. 0
            20 May 2018 18: 22
            God works in mysterious ways...
    2. +11
      18 May 2018 13: 35
      On the question of which countries in this union have already agreed to enter, Nauert did not answer.

      The same is my secret: Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and, probably, Canada and Australia. As always. Forgot more Ukrainians, Balts and Psheks.
    3. Maz
      +1
      18 May 2018 15: 05
      Well yes, the issue price is Iran’s 150 billion dollars that are in American banks. The stump is clear. And Israel won’t want to snatch a piece for itself .. Yes, for us it’s a lightbulb - oil will grow from this in denyuzhki per barrel, let them form
    4. 0
      18 May 2018 17: 30
      A coalition already exists - Israel, Saudi Arabia plus the USA. Well, every little thing for a ruble a bunch will be recruited into an appendage like Bahrain. request
    5. 0
      18 May 2018 17: 36
      The United States will simply create some ISIS Formation in this direction in the guise of some kind of movement for shit democracy ... well, in general, the same thing as in Syria, only in a new direction for the fight against Iran .... Nothing new. Divide, fractions ... and conquer weak, spineless, controlled districts like the Baltic states, and other geyropa ....
  2. +7
    18 May 2018 13: 09
    We will create a new coalition against Iran, but it is not anti-Iranian. She herself understood what she said. Today, the word "coalition" is in second place after the word "sanction." Go ahead, that's just what you’ll end up with.
    1. +1
      18 May 2018 13: 13
      Quote: rotmistr60
      We will create a new coalition against Iran, but it is not anti-Iranian. She herself understood what she said. Today, the word "coalition" is in second place after the word "sanction." Go ahead, that's just what you’ll end up with.


      She then just very well understands what she says. They also need a war in the region, so they muddle it.
      1. +7
        18 May 2018 13: 17
        Ha, today the synonym for the coalition can safely recognize the designation of the gang!
        1. +3
          18 May 2018 13: 32
          Victor hi .... and with whom the mattresses will create a "coalition"? .... from the Isis?
          1. +3
            18 May 2018 13: 46
            Hi Andrew soldier
            The East is such a delicate matter that in the end everything rests on oil and gas ... resources, grandmas!
            Who has grandmas there? .... invested in the same bucks and other staff nishtyaki?
            You understand, the poor, the weak will not be invited to such a "refined" society.
            That's just the incomprehensible ones with the chosen ones, they really are on their own mind, and the "refined" company looks very dumb for them.
            They will be the same as always .....
            1. +3
              18 May 2018 14: 11
              no, brother, the system is different here .... we will express our concern "," sadness ".... and the babosy will be in our pocket .... the springboard helps us
              1. +4
                18 May 2018 14: 43
                So Trump is ours! It was in vain whether they drank champagne, some for his victory.
                Although, a striped jump in prices in the vein, they will uncork wells, pump more muck there and a river of shale oil / gas will flow in all directions.
                This business, nothing personal ... more Trump will add. good deal and the right investment!
                1. +3
                  18 May 2018 14: 49
                  laughing Vit amused, thank you .... now we still take Ossetia, Abkhazia and LDNR under wing .......... and there it’s not far to Kuev laughing
          2. +1
            18 May 2018 14: 31
            Victor hi .... and with whom will the mattresses create a “coalition”? .... from the Isis?
            With the igig, their coalition failed (the igil somehow quickly ended).
            1. +3
              18 May 2018 14: 49
              And the barmalei almost came out on self-sufficiency, so the owners screwed up the suction .... and here we flew on, self-sufficiency, aunt, resources and meat, respectively. reduction went.
  3. +3
    18 May 2018 13: 15
    The association’s activities will be directed “against the Iranian regime and its actions, and not against the people of Iran,” she explained.[i] [/ i]
    As always, everything turned upside down. And they also forgot the Iranian people to ask, "democratizers" xRenovs.
  4. +1
    18 May 2018 13: 20
    the goal is the same as in Russia - to split the society, saying that we are fighting not against the people, but against the government ... unfortunately, our authorities are either at a loss, or on purpose, but the Americans are helping in this ...
  5. +1
    18 May 2018 13: 23
    And nothing will burn out from the satanic kagal
    1. 0
      18 May 2018 13: 30
      Quote: Dormidont
      And nothing will burn out from the satanic kagal

      hi
      A little off topic, but in support of your post:
  6. +1
    18 May 2018 13: 52
    We haven’t bombed you yet? Then we fly to you! Besides Iran, in my opinion, there are no “regimes” left except for penguins.
  7. +1
    18 May 2018 14: 01
    At the same time, the State Department specified that it was not about the formation of an “anti-Iranian coalition,” but a union directed against the “Iranian regime” ...

    Not a word, but a song.
  8. 0
    18 May 2018 14: 22
    S-300 and S-400, coupled with the Shell, is a very effective remedy for annoying Yankees ...
    1. +2
      18 May 2018 15: 20
      For this, it is necessary to show political will and take Iran into military allies, it may be problematic on the one hand, but on the other it needs a strategic counterbalance to the Western and Saudi-Israeli coalitions, Russia needs an alliance with Iran, especially in Syria fighting shoulder to shoulder, it’s just not survive, let’s hand over Iran, after a while Russia will be alone under sights from all over the world ....
      1. +1
        18 May 2018 15: 34
        and so you look together maybe we’ll break the ridge of this coalition ... and if they really start to iron Iran, having felt impunity, they will take up Syria, the situation is still ....
        1. 0
          18 May 2018 16: 41
          Of course, a lot depends on who our elite likes, prestige and blood is dearer than the Israeli or Iranian ruling elite, they will strategize on this ....
    2. 0
      18 May 2018 20: 42
      Quote: Volka
      S-300 and S-400, coupled with the Shell, is a very effective remedy for annoying Yankees ...

      which can be easily overloaded with a large number of attacking missiles such as the "Indian Ax", the same effective means, the same as that of the DPRK ...
  9. +1
    18 May 2018 21: 10
    Here is restless ... it is on the one hand, and on the other - in one person it is sore to go into battle ...?
  10. 0
    18 May 2018 21: 52
    Is it stingy alone? As always - carry chestnuts out of the fire with the wrong hands? At one time, we sorted out with Afghanistan ourselves, allies am they didn’t smell like anything in the Warsaw block - but now the Taliban are shooting all these Czechs with Poles in the same Afghanistan ... laughing
  11. 0
    18 May 2018 22: 03
    As I understand it, a serious mobilization will take place in Israel? Something tells me that American soldiers do not want to die in Iran.
  12. +3
    19 May 2018 19: 07
    Let them form a coalition to fight common sense.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"