Military Review

Am I a trembling creature or do I have international law?

33
The events of recent years in the world clearly allow one to make a disappointing conclusion: international law is a myth! Out of the entire body of international rules and rights, with the full legal impotence of the UN, only one remains, as ancient as the world is the “right of force”. And it is quite natural. After all, what is right in essence? This is the observance of certain agreements between certain subjects. And here lies a surprise: something is negotiated only with those whom they cannot destroy. Or force. And if in the world there is only one country that can "bend" anyone, then what and with whom does it agree? And who will punish this country for spitting on previous agreements? They do not agree with the weak, they give orders, and the so-called international law becomes nothing more than a formality, interpreted as you like. But not by anyone. How is the Gopnik? "Sigi is? .. And if I find?" Ask around for international law from the former Yugoslavia, from Libya, Iraq, Syria ... Something tells me that their answer will be obscene even pretexts and articles.




Russia has recently gained strength, but apparently not enough, since it continues to rely on already mythical international law and engage in boltology where it is necessary to bluntly beat. Take the same Syria, on the territory of which there are American troops, which, unlike ours, no one called there, and do what they want. So what? International law, UN, where are you? No answer. Israeli aviation openly strikes the territory of Syria and threatens to roll everything into rubble if they return fire. Is this also within the framework of "international law"? Or is it based on the "law of power" without any framework?

Purely speculatively interesting: what will happen if Syria has modern aviation, armored vehicles, artillery from nowhere, and on the basis of that same international law, it will demand to remove American and Turkish troops from its territory? And in case of refusal, artillery and aviation will smash NATO bases into their rubble on their territory, and accidentally survive the coils on the caterpillars together with the covered and covered terrorists with a simultaneous warning that not only that shot, but even sneezing towards Syria will be a reason to smash around, that the United States or NATO on earth, water and air moves. Clear pepper, everyone will know whose equipment and crews are, but formally they will be Syrian. Americans dump or take a chance?

Or Ukraine. With hysterical screams like "Ahhhhh! The Nazis are at our borders !!! Like in 41!" According to the "Azov", "Aydar" and other pravosekam our bomber "unload". The troops do not need to enter. What for? We need it? Just keep track of the social networks and so on, where the Nazi symbols flashed, so after a couple of hours there the bombers are relieved. And the “world community” was warned in advance that it was necessary to write notes of protest on toilet paper, although there was some chance that they would be read.

Jokes jokes, but personally I am worried about the situation. At the beginning of the 30 of the last century, one European country also declared itself exceptional. True, the words they used were other, "true Aryans," "superior race." But this was enough for them to arrange a six-year-old carnage, the number of victims of which from all sides still cannot be counted. Numbers jump from 50 to 170 millions. In fact, who considered the Chinese, Indians, Hungarians, Romanians and other "Untermensch"? Here and the current "heirs of true Aryans" represented by the United States and their vassals (the word allies here clearly does not fit) behave in the territories occupied by them, if it is better, then very little. And they firmly believe that “international law” and “US interests” are one and the same.

At the end of the 80s, we were all offered a large pile of brown substance, which the IMF, the USA, and others called chocolate. And in exchange for this heap, they demanded to abandon sovereignty, industry, basic science, national interests, and other "tasteless porridge." And we, joyful (you can change porridge for chocolate) were led to this divorce. Indeed: "Malshik, throw out the porridge, I'm there tekho chocolate!" And it was here that it turned out that that brown substance was not chocolate at all. A "porridge", though it was tasteless and nasty, but really useful. "Buran", "Spiral", "Mriya", "Skiff" ... How long will it take us to create something like that? At the end of the 80s, there were only 2 on the globe (in words: two!) Countries capable of serially (!) Creating vertical take-off and landing aircraft. Of all the variety of countries, only 5 (USA, UK, France, USSR, Italy) were capable of a FULL cycle of jet engine production. (At present, France and Italy can no longer). All other engines and / or components for them were bought. And what have we traded for? On "Went out, jerk when grown-up uncles talk"? Has Russia strengthened, so that the Anglo-Saxons, scratching their heads, decided: “Send - they will give it in the face, let's negotiate” or only to the level “Wow, how puffy, fun to watch”? Will “international law” be such again or will it remain in quotes?

Author:
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vard
    Vard 19 May 2018 05: 47
    +9
    With a kind word and a gun ... It is always more convincing than just a kind word ...
    1. Chertt
      Chertt 19 May 2018 06: 43
      +6
      It seems not a bad article, but for the hundredth time about the same thing. Already the most “non-quick” is understandable, Rechte Faust (right fist) has returned.
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid 19 May 2018 09: 38
        +5
        Quote: Chertt
        ..... for the hundredth time about the same thing. .
        Someone missed, someone didn’t have time ..... If everyone had learned everything, then there would be no liberal cries with accusations of the Russian Federation
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 19 May 2018 09: 54
          +5
          Quote: Reptiloid
          if everyone had learned everything, there would be no liberal cries

          "A man sees what he wants," in my opinion the most hackneyed phrase, but true. Everyone has access to this, for a long time everyone understood, but to whom it was not given ..? .. They still believe that the Crimean bridge is drawn wink
          1. MPN
            MPN 19 May 2018 11: 44
            +6
            Quote: Chertt
            "A man sees what he wants," in my opinion the most hackneyed phrase, but true.

            Not really ...
            if everyone had learned everything, then there would be no liberal cries
            They do not see what they want, they do what they need ... yes
            1. Separ DNR
              Separ DNR 19 May 2018 12: 12
              +1
              Am I trembling or do I have international law?
              Jurists on the right to have the right to the right ...
              1. sabakina
                sabakina 19 May 2018 21: 33
                +1
                Gray hi reminded ...
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 May 2018 07: 04
    +4
    Will “international law” become so again or will it remain in quotation marks?
    It may become possible if the United States disappears, or gets so tough that decades will be restored and they will no longer regain the badge and form of the "international gendarme."
  3. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 19 May 2018 07: 52
    +4
    The thoughts raised in the article are of course very important, but the author forgot to say something, and yet in the 30s, 40s of the 20th century, much was said about the great danger to the world that comes to power in Germany " shopkeepers "and were right! And what is new now in the Western world, again from the USA to the EU, the same “shopkeepers” are in power and the day is not far off when they want the “new Adolf” and we well know how it will all end, which is clearly illustrated by Trump and his team!
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 19 May 2018 10: 41
      +6
      Quote: kartalovkolya
      as illustrated by Trump and his team!

      Trump - the graphic expression "America is Above All!"
      PS This is for us and the world of Trump - a fiend of hell. And for the Yankees and American business - he is the spokesman of their national interests, clearing the place for Amy businesswomen around the world!
      1. Igor V
        Igor V 19 May 2018 20: 26
        +2
        Do you mean America uber alles? Yes, they didn’t come up with anything new.
      2. Akuzenka
        Akuzenka 21 May 2018 10: 45
        0
        So the Negro Obama said to them about their exclusivity, loudly and in print. So Trump is just continuing this.
  4. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 19 May 2018 07: 57
    +1
    "It" Am I trembling or do I have international law?

    It is necessary with pictures:
    "It" am I trembling ... yes or international law I have ... stop No.
  5. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 19 May 2018 08: 11
    0
    How many big letters in the article .... But I, as a reader, didn’t understand what the call was for? Turn yourself into gopnik? The author somehow one-sidedly divided everything into white and black, forgetting about other colors. Examples? China. It does not have the most modern army, does not put forward territorial claims to its neighbors, but has already picked up part of the puppetry ropes ... Or Switzerland. After all, it does not occur to anyone to send troops there. So international law exists, but to apply it to your country, it must be earned ... Good deeds, a legal field.
    1. sabakina
      sabakina 19 May 2018 21: 37
      +1
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Good deeds, legal field.
      Nazarius hi
    2. zoolu350
      zoolu350 20 May 2018 02: 46
      +1
      An unsuccessful example was given about the PRC, because at the moment the PLA is the MOST POWERFUL army in the world in terms of the main indicators of combat readiness, I will not even talk about the economy (especially about industrial capacities). The territorial claims of the PRC have a wagon and a small cart, and the oligarchy of the Russian Federation has already made the PRC feel the sweet taste of the implementation of these claims. And Switzerland is just a common bank, and so it was saved, that in WWII, that in WWII. So that's right, international law is the law of powerful Empires.
  6. parusnik
    parusnik 19 May 2018 08: 37
    +8
    Will “international law” become so again or will it remain in quotation marks?
    ... Whoever is stronger has “international law”, and so will the capitalist world exist for now ... Remember the capitalist world until October 1917 ... I don’t remember something that the world would be indignant at the colonization of Africa, Asia and there weren’t any particular conflicts in the process of sharing, there was something to share, we agreed that we wouldn’t choke, some, however, were late for sharing or didn’t have enough capacities, they shouted at what was falling away from others .. When the USSR became the leader of the humiliated and oppressed, they started talking about compliance with international law, they say it’s impossible to do this and sometimes considered the opinion of the world and the norms of international law ... How strong economically Russia was, it cannot be able to gather many under its wing ... there is no idea ... there is nothing to offer ... unfortunately ... Our well-wishers in a figurative and literal sense, as they say about Russia .. but what has become, not about! how it became in Russia, we would have ...
    1. Igor V
      Igor V 19 May 2018 20: 38
      +3
      In 2010, he listened on the radio to the cultural representative of Cyprus. He was educated with us, and the host was surprised: how, they say, did you decide to come to the USSR? And he replied: “At that time, the Soviet Union seemed like a paradise to us ...” She asks if her opinion changed when she arrived. And he says no, you had a free education, medicine, etc., people were friendly, I really felt like in paradise, as I understood then. I listened with my mouth open. Ours will not say this on the air.
  7. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 19 May 2018 08: 59
    +4
    "Compliance" with the law is the lot of the weak, the strong - establish these rights ".- So, said one of the Roman emperors.
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 19 May 2018 12: 03
      +3
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      "Compliance" with the law is the lot of the weak, the strong - establish these rights ".- So, said one of the Roman emperors.

      And so appeared Roman law, which dominates the world to this day, before which all lawyers of all countries and peoples worship.
  8. Altona
    Altona 19 May 2018 09: 59
    +1
    Quote: Leader of the Redskins
    Examples? China. It does not have the most modern army, does not put forward territorial claims to its neighbors, but has already picked up part of the puppetry ropes ...

    ---------------------------------------
    Well ... As for the modern army and claims to neighbors, you are clearly getting excited here. China has a modern army, and a lot of complaints to all its neighbors. Recently, Rosneft rolled out a Chinese warning for production on the Vietnamese shelf, which China recognizes as its own. And China can show its teeth even without weapons, by counter duties, for example, or by copyright. Or maybe with weapons. Demonstratively rolling out his squadron to the disputed waters.
  9. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 19 May 2018 11: 17
    0
    Quote: Chertt
    It seems not a bad article, but for the hundredth time about the same thing. Already the most “non-quick” is understandable, Rechte Faust (right fist) has returned.


    And who gives our fist to our team?
  10. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 19 May 2018 11: 20
    0
    Quote: Altona
    Quote: Leader of the Redskins
    Examples? China. It does not have the most modern army, does not put forward territorial claims to its neighbors, but has already picked up part of the puppetry ropes ...

    ---------------------------------------
    Well ... As for the modern army and claims to neighbors, you are clearly getting excited here. China has a modern army, and a lot of complaints to all its neighbors. Recently, Rosneft rolled out a Chinese warning for production on the Vietnamese shelf, which China recognizes as its own. And China can show its teeth even without weapons, by counter duties, for example, or by copyright. Or maybe with weapons. Demonstratively rolling out his squadron to the disputed waters.


    China is a plot from the future, but the scenery for it is being prepared today!
  11. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 19 May 2018 11: 42
    +1
    Quote: parusnik
    Will “international law” become so again or will it remain in quotation marks?
    ... Whoever is stronger has “international law”, and so will the capitalist world exist for now ... Remember the capitalist world until October 1917 ... I don’t remember something that the world would be indignant at the colonization of Africa, Asia and there weren’t any particular conflicts in the process of sharing, there was something to share, we agreed that we wouldn’t choke, some, however, were late for sharing or didn’t have enough capacities, they shouted at what was falling away from others .. When the USSR became the leader of the humiliated and oppressed, they started talking about compliance with international law, they say it’s impossible to do this and sometimes considered the opinion of the world and the norms of international law ... How strong economically Russia was, it cannot be able to gather many under its wing ... there is no idea ... there is nothing to offer ... unfortunately ... Our well-wishers in a figurative and literal sense, as they say about Russia .. but what has become, not about! how it became in Russia, we would have ...


    I absolutely support about the idea! The second person who on the forum for so much time expressed the right idea!
  12. polikarpich
    polikarpich 19 May 2018 16: 42
    0
    I wonder why in Syria beat Amers, if the main goal, to prevent the construction of a gas pipeline to Europe, is completed. Very cheap, and to be honest, with acceptable blood. Civilization creeps into the stage through which we went through in 1918-1921. and in the "dashing" nineties and couples of peaceful years, it will not hurt us at least.
  13. Normal ok
    Normal ok 19 May 2018 17: 17
    +3
    At the beginning of the 30 of the last century, one European country also declared itself exceptional.

    At VO, every day dozens of comments claiming the same thing: we are the best, the exceptional soul, the best culture, the most, the most, the most, in all respects wassat
  14. Altona
    Altona 19 May 2018 18: 42
    +1
    Quote: Normal ok
    At VO, every day dozens of comments claiming the same thing: we are the best, the exceptional soul, the best culture, the most, the most, the most, in all respects

    -----------------------------------
    Well, I personally have not read such comments. But the fact that we are talented and quick-witted people cannot be taken away from us.
  15. ver_
    ver_ 20 May 2018 04: 56
    +1
    Quote: Monster_Fat
    "Compliance" with the law is the lot of the weak, the strong - establish these rights ".- So, said one of the Roman emperors.

    ... All this is a fairy tale .. Rome was founded by brothers - Yuri-George Dolgoruky-his hands reached Rome .. and his younger brother Ivan Kalita = Khan Batuy .. It was the First Rome - the territory of Russia of the 12th century. Even the Roman emperor Gaius Julius Caesar is just a reflection of George Yuri Dolgoruky (Caesar's older brother) ..
  16. bandabas
    bandabas 20 May 2018 06: 49
    0
    Homo homini lupus est, however.
    1. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 20 May 2018 08: 33
      0
      Well, do not offend animals by comparison with not the best representatives of the human race, because wolves are ultimately "orderlies of the forest", unlike the scavengers of the west!
  17. BAI
    BAI 21 May 2018 13: 59
    0
    What will happen if Syria has out of nowhere modern aviation, armored vehicles, artillery, and on the basis of that very international law, it will require the removal of American and Turkish troops from its territory?

    But nothing will happen! From the word "completely."
    Because in order to realize this
    with artillery and aviation, it will smash NATO bases on its territory into rubble, and accidentally wrap survivors on tracks along with covered and covered terrorists

    We must be able to fight. And only Israel can fight in the Middle East.
    1. ver_
      ver_ 23 May 2018 05: 55
      0
      ... * there is no worse fighter than a frightened Jew * ..
  18. sleeve
    sleeve 22 May 2018 04: 36
    0
    The process is right. Of course, hunting is faster for everyone, so that in the morning and the USA begin to consult. But for now, in the best case, in the middle. The restoration of the world "glade of sovereignty" is a rather long song. In addition, Russia is "coming" now from the economic side. It will be even longer. It’s ridiculous for the females that these contests will not bring the gross GDP to good. Countries with a high share of the real economy are really able to survive the crisis, since the lack of liquidity for empty papers with numerous names is an almost ordinary event depending on size, but the consumption of real gas, electricity, metal, machine tools has slightly different structuring laws. Mixing them and trying to build addiction is pure machinism. Therefore, the true path, comrades. However, then, under the prevailing conditions of a "hostile world environment", the basis of power is the growth of well-being of the population as a key to the growth of consumption and high liquidity of GDP. Well, let's see ... Let's see.