Crimean bridge. Bomb attack with a minimum number of casualties: advice from fraternal America

43
Bomb attack on the Crimean bridge with the minimum number of casualties. It was advised to bring this plan to Kiev from America. Fortunately, not from the White House.





Russian bridge to the Crimea on the TV channel CNN called "a powerful symbol of the Putin era."

The 19-kilometer bridge, the longest in Europe, connected the Russian Krasnodar Territory with the Crimean peninsula, attached to Russia in the 2014 year. And his discovery marks the physical reunification of the Crimea with the Russian mainland, and at the same time serves as a symbol of Putin’s 18-year rule.

True, the correspondent Natan Hodge, this bridge is at the same time a symbol of "international isolation of Russia." Quote:

Russian intelligence services seized the Crimea by conducting a lightning-fast operation in February 2014. At first, the Kremlin denied that the soldiers in masks and camouflage without a single identification mark were Russian military, but later admitted that the so-called “little green men” were really from Russian divisions


Construction of the bridge, the author continues, began in February 2016 of the year. Later that year, the US Treasury applied a series of sanctions against the seven companies involved in construction. In fact, the sanctions were aimed at Putin’s closest associates, primarily the company controlled by Arkady Rotenberg, Putin’s childhood friend and his former judo partner.

The opening of the Crimean Bridge has a symbolic meaning for Russia, Hodge repeats. For the Russian government, “the annexation of the Crimea and the opening of the bridge” are the subjects of “patriotic pride”. According to Putin himself, Crimea will never return to Ukraine.

The topic of the Crimean Bridge and the countering of the Russian "annexation" was developed and culminated in another American journalist, Tom Rogan, whose article was published in "Washington Examiner".

Note that it was published in the “Opinion” section and, therefore, cannot be a position of the editorial board. Nor can it be a new American plan for bombing opposition to Mr Putin and Rotenberg. However, no one can vouch for the soundness of the thinking of politicians in the White House and in Kiev.

Ukraine should “blow up the Crimean bridge of Putin,” advises Tom Rogan. And a bit of specifics: Ukraine needs to "destroy the elements of the bridge."

Yes, such a course of action will become an “escalation against Putin” and “will almost certainly cause retaliatory measures.” And yet "this bridge is an outrageous insult to the authority of Ukraine as a nation."

From the point of view of Putin, this bridge is “everything”. The bridge brought the Russian government "almost to bankruptcy" and cost the treasury "billions of dollars." And now he is the road to the Crimea, securing "the official physical and psychological appropriation of Ukrainian territory."

“Fortunately,” Mr. Rogan continues, “Ukraine has the means to launch air strikes on the bridge in order to render it unsuitable (at least temporarily) for use.”

The Ukrainian Air Force could “hit the bridge” so as to reduce the risk of casualties.

But how will Putin respond?

He will probably respond with an escalation in eastern Ukraine, the journalist suggests. But such an escalation is likely to “come true in any case in the next few months.” According to Rogan, Putin wants to “gradually absorb Ukraine”.

Therefore, airstrikes, even if they deactivate the bridge only for a while, will give Moscow an “unmistakable signal”: the Kremlin will be warned that Ukrainians do not want to accept the “formalization of Putin’s territorial theft”.

Bombing the bridge will also curb Putin’s ambitions and destroy his propaganda.

According to Rogan, the actions described above (attacks on the Crimean Bridge) are both obvious and urgent. For any state that allows "to lead away its territory" takes a "step towards extinction."

The publication of an American journalist in the Washington Examiner is “a complete absurdity for a sane person,” says Sergey Borozdin, head of Kerch.

“Definitely, this is not correct to write. Incorrectly - to put it mildly, ”he said. RBC. According to him, Mr. Rogan "is either simply inadequate, or a provocateur."

Borozdin reminded that both the bridge and the borders of Russia in general "are under such control and protection that it is physically impossible to do".

There is another review on the American material.

The publication was commented on by Valery Aksyonov, deputy of the State Council of Crimea. According to him, the services protecting the Crimean Bridge “work, not sleep.” “Calling for military action is the worst thing,” he said. “They tried to block the Crimea by electricity, by water, by other things, but these villains failed.”

So, experts do not believe in military opposition. But the peaceful opposition, more precisely, the information, is in full swing.

Victor Nebozhenko (Glavred, Ukraine) объявил The Crimean Bridge is a “symbol of eternal hostility between Russia and Ukraine,” and at the same time ridiculed Putin’s “successes”.

Russia under Putin’s eternal and wise leadership stubbornly shrivels and loosens. Judge for yourself. As a result of his wise policy, instead of controlling Berlin and Prague, Russia in the 21 century "courageously" fights for control of Donetsk and Lugansk. Moreover, for the second time in 250 years, Russia is once again taking possession of the Crimea and is terribly proud of this “achievement”.


According to the analyst, the Crimean bridge built is Moscow’s recognition of the fact: Russia’s “land corridor” to the Crimea “will never be.” The Crimea is becoming the “rocket-nuclear aircraft carrier of Russia”, but it has no place to sail for it. “Turkey and NATO are ahead, and Ukraine and the United States are offended and hostile behind,” the author explains.

But this is journalism. Officially, apparently, Ukraine will initiate a lawsuit against Russia. Foundation: illegal construction of the Crimean bridge. Such a claim is already being prepared by the Ministry of Environment in Kiev.

According to UNIAN, the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine studying materials for filing an international claim against the Russian Federation over the construction of the Kerch (Crimea) bridge. This was written on Facebook by Minister Ostap Semerak, who called the bridge “damned”:

Experts of the Ministry of Environment are already studying all the materials for the next international lawsuit against Russia for the construction of this damned bridge.


By the way, Mr. Semerak made it clear that he personally does not support the calls of other hot guys who are calling on social networks to let Ukrainian people cross the new bridge Tanks.

I do not want tanks. I want a new future for Ukraine, in which there will be no crazy neighbors.


Earlier, we recall, the opening of the bridge was condemned by the Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko. Poroshenko tried to be ironic, saying that the invaders would need this bridge when they leave the Crimea.

However, Poroshenko and his departments are now not up to the suit and not to the international courts.

Already fifty-one deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine has signed the statement, allowing to initiate the procedure of impeachment against Poroshenko. This was reported by the people's deputy Yuri Derevyanko in his "Facebook".

Will the opposition get the required 226 votes to start the impeachment? Derevianko himself is full of optimism: "I am convinced that we have every chance in the near future to get the 226 required signatures!"

In any case, the impeachment plan itself is more evidence that the imperious throne in Ukraine is tottering.

But the Crimean bridge stands firmly.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    17 May 2018 08: 30
    Crimean bridge. Bomb attack with a minimum number of casualties: advice from fraternal America
    to a preemptive strike, are we entitled?
    1. +7
      17 May 2018 08: 50
      calls from other hot guys who are calling on social networks for Ukrainian tanks to ride along the new bridge.
      They will definitely pass as trophy ones .. Moreover, those who are stubborn will be taken through it through the stage of correctional labor.
      1. +4
        17 May 2018 10: 17
        RIA Novosti reports that as soon as the road and rail links on the Crimean bridge are fully completed, it will be able to process 40 000 wagons per day and transport 14 million passengers and 13 million tons of cargo per year.

        Can the USA and the collective West and the criminal junta in Kiev, led by the Pentagon, SUCH calmly withstand ?! This is hard to believe.
        Ha! And most importantly, it is Putin who is to blame for all this, and not they themselves! It is not their own predatory geopolitics of neocolonization in relation to the USSR, Ukraine, and Russia. Etc.
        1. +3
          17 May 2018 10: 20
          Quote: Tatiana
          RIA Novosti reports that as soon as the road and rail links on the Crimean bridge are fully completed, it will be able to process 40 000 wagons per day and transport 14 million passengers and 13 million tons of cargo per year.

          Can the USA and the collective West, led by the Pentagon and the criminal junta in Kiev, SUCH calmly withstand ?! This is hard to believe.

          Even if they will take 100 rubles for transit vehicles, I think it will quickly pay off and will make a profit.
      2. +1
        17 May 2018 20: 01
        Who needs this scrap?
        1. +1
          21 May 2018 09: 49
          Scrap metal from Ukrainian tanks is just what you need, in the country and throughout the world there is now a shortage of metal! Even cans are collected, and metal is good in tanks!
    2. +1
      17 May 2018 10: 01
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      to a preemptive strike, are we entitled?

      Of course: if they attack Yes
      1. +1
        17 May 2018 16: 29
        Step to the left, step to the right - an attempt to escape! Leaping in place is a provocation!
    3. 0
      17 May 2018 15: 20
      and advisers too.
  2. +3
    17 May 2018 08: 35
    To the inscription on the college, I would add: Tora.Tora.Tora. For greater reliability. And recall how, in the end, it all ended!
    1. +4
      17 May 2018 08: 42
      Quote: andrewkor
      I would add: Tora.Tora.Tora.

      Do not understand, s, Asians s ©, albeit tseeuropa. They only looked at Pearl Harbor, probably, but there were no such wise words there, symbolism would not reach them.
      1. +4
        17 May 2018 12: 15
        and they would just remember the story, few kamikaze have achieved their goals, knocked them down to hell!
  3. +5
    17 May 2018 08: 37
    The Ukrainian Air Force could “hit the bridge” so as to reduce the risk of casualties.

    Here are fools (may the moderators forgive me). One escalation, in the event of a strike on the bridge, in the Donbass, will not do. There is already an assault on Kiev is drawn.
    1. +3
      17 May 2018 10: 42
      It could be worse. Recognition of the state "Ukraine" as terrorist with all the consequences ...
      And everyone knows how to deal with terrorists from the roundups: "... after unsuccessful negotiations ... were eliminated ...".
      1. +3
        17 May 2018 11: 13
        Quote: solzh
        One escalation, in the event of a strike on the bridge, in the Donbass, will not do. There is already an assault on Kiev is drawn.

        And the “trampists” of the USA need a proxy war between Ukraine and Russia!
        First, the Poroshenko was planted by Washington in Kiev to protect precisely the national interests of the Anglo-Saxons of the United States and Great Britain, and not some indigenous "Ukrainians" there, as the local "saloids" think of themselves in Kiev with an ambition for historical ignorance.
        Second, the monarchical Great Britain continues to historically use the United States as its former colony, but in another - poor quality. Namely, as an overseas weapon of its own military-political attacks on Russia, for its personal British-colonial purposes.
        At the same time, London itself, outwardly from an armed conflict with Russia, directly seems to be eliminating itself, but it is arming the USA and the collective West over the edge in all its British-Anglo-Saxon provocations against Russia. We can clearly see this from the recent provocative hysteria of May with the same Skripals in Salisbury, with a missile strike by the armed forces of the USA, Britain and France on sovereign Syria, etc.

        In connection with this recent British incitement of May from London in the world against Russia and the SAR, the inflammatory proposal of journalist Tom Rogan, whose article was published in the Washington Examiner, under the heading "Opinion" to bomb the Crimean Bridge, may well come from the British intelligence services in union with the English May. A kind of, it could be a “trial ball” from London to transfer it as a British baton to Trump, which Trump should not just hold in his hands, according to London special services, but use it as his own personal guide to Washington’s action!

        In general, it’s not in vain that Sergey Borozdin, the head of Kerch, told RBC that he believes that Mr. Rogan “is either simply inadequate or a provocateur”. The only question is whose provocateur: Washington or London? Most likely, in this case he is still the spokesman for London, who is manipulating Washington, but both of whom are in the same harness "from above" in someone else's hands.
        1. +2
          17 May 2018 13: 38
          Quote: Tatiana
          And the “trampists” of the USA need a proxy war between Ukraine and Russia!

          That's it! It was just a clue for the not very far-sighted partners of the Americans what they needed to do for the pleasure of the owner.
        2. +2
          17 May 2018 15: 47
          The reaction to Rogan’s article should not be the emotional blaze of asses, but the filing of one or more lawsuits in court. And methodical, persistent bringing them to an acceptable solution.
          If they will dynamite in the courts, there are extrajudicial options for the development of events, as Israel clearly demonstrated after the Olympics in Munich. No need to waste power.
  4. +8
    17 May 2018 08: 42
    Fortunately, ”continues Mr. Rogan,“ Ukraine has the means to launch air strikes on the bridge. ”
    This Mr. obviously suggests means, and especially air, about which Poroshenko lauds, and which do not correspond to reality. This morning it was reported that our Foreign Ministry made a statement to the US State Department on this matter. The wording of the statement is not faintly intricate, but direct and rigid.
    1. +6
      17 May 2018 12: 17
      and by the way, will there be enough of all the lithacs who are independent to at least have time to see the bridge in sight?
  5. +5
    17 May 2018 08: 42
    shtatovtsy once again demonstrated their shitty essence ... all with the wrong hands ...
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +4
    17 May 2018 08: 57
    But the Crimean bridge stands firmly!

  8. +3
    17 May 2018 08: 58
    And the blow to the Washington Regional Committee in response is provided by the script? Fortunately, they beg for a long time ...
  9. +8
    17 May 2018 09: 38
    in fact, an acceptable move - it will be possible to "overlook" the land corridor
  10. +8
    17 May 2018 09: 48
    San Francisco has the Golden Gate Bridge, which is notorious for the Suicide Bridge. Our bridges are the bridges of hope, their bridges are the bridges of despair. Let's proceed from this.
    1. +3
      17 May 2018 10: 31
      Well said sincerely. hi
      1. +5
        17 May 2018 12: 25
        turn to the classics
        Here
        life
        was
        one is carefree
        to others -
        hungry
        lingering howl.
        Hence
        unemployed
        to the hudson
        threw themselves
        upside down.
  11. Ham
    0
    17 May 2018 11: 39
    shallow emelya - your week
  12. +2
    17 May 2018 12: 13
    Hmm. The Americans, it seems, completely dispersed their sovietologists and poheril studying our mentality. It turns out that they sincerely think that a blow to the territory of Russia will change the attitude of our people to power for the worse? I hope this is nothing more than a journalist’s vyser. And that advisers to the US leadership better understand us.
  13. 0
    17 May 2018 12: 23
    He wrote one troll overseas ... and then they swallowed it and let's feed it))) We continue, gentlemen !!! It is necessary to seriously develop the topic !!!!!!
    1. -2
      17 May 2018 19: 46
      They download trolls on the Internet.
      And here is the serious media.
  14. +3
    17 May 2018 12: 42
    And if the answer arrives, did the advisers not think about it?
    But it will fly.
  15. +2
    17 May 2018 13: 00
    Therefore, airstrikes, even if they deactivate the bridge only for a while, will give Moscow an “unmistakable signal”: the Kremlin will be warned that Ukrainians do not want to accept the “formalization of Putin’s territorial theft”.
    Well let them start ... wait. Only then do not let them shout: “What about us?”
  16. 0
    17 May 2018 16: 36
    Why do we chew snot again and wipe ourselves after another spitting in the face? Why so far this Rogan and his boss have not yet begun legal proceedings in all courts in the district for inciting ethnic hatred and calls for war, which are criminal offenses in all countries? Again only blah blah blah at the “yard” level, what kind of helplessness is such a missionary humility as among the lackeys, although it may be so, judging by who uses the money earned by our people and where.
  17. 0
    17 May 2018 18: 29
    It is best to mine the barges at the moment of passage under the arch to blow up the ship ... this is easier to do than fly there.
    1. 0
      18 May 2018 22: 43
      Also not an option. Firstly. The crew will need to go somewhere. If they don’t drown, then they will be helped to drown. Secondly, after this, the equipment of the Mariupol port can be safely put into scrap.
  18. 0
    17 May 2018 18: 50
    Some kind of sick toad "horse" with an atrophied left hemisphere. belay
  19. -2
    17 May 2018 19: 45
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    to a preemptive strike, are we entitled?

    No, of course.
    Only 2 countries are entitled to a preemptive strike. As it’s not hard to guess, this is Israel with the USA.
  20. Cat
    +1
    17 May 2018 22: 16
    little green men

    Actually, the original was "polite." And "little green" is from an extra dose of whiskey wassat drinks
  21. +4
    17 May 2018 23: 04
    Oh, how do they want to fight Ukrainians with Russia .... laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
  22. +1
    17 May 2018 23: 23
    Nahan, this Nathan Hodge will smear his dull broomstick with green stuff and call him “little green men”. and our guys were polite green men. They misinterpret even in such trifles.
    1. +1
      19 May 2018 17: 59
      Quote: antibi0tikk
      . and our guys were polite green men.

      Polite people !!! And the green men, even polite, even rude, already wrote above, from which they appear hi
  23. 0
    18 May 2018 17: 26
    Rottenberg is Putin's childhood friend ... sanctions against rotenberg. hmm. I think if I were a childhood friend of the president who is trying to lift the country out of his ass. then frankly I do not care would be a loss. in case of luck, I would get the market 1/6 of the planet if it is mercantile. but if humanly. my age is limited. if something can be done for the country when it needs and I can ... then stupidly refuse
  24. 0
    21 May 2018 12: 14
    We will not give our own to anyone, neither friends nor enemies! Many have already tried to capture Crimea, but still he remained Russian. So gentlemen, dill, you can lick your lips and shout "I will eat you!"

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"