Military Review

2020 will be ready. US intelligence called the availability of the Russian "Vanguard"

63
The American television channel CNBC, citing its sources familiar with US intelligence, claims that the Russian avant-garde complex will probably be used for combat purposes from 2020 onwards. The channel notes that at the moment the United States is not able to resist the latest Russian rocket.


2020 will be ready. US intelligence called the availability of the Russian "Vanguard"


According to US intelligence, Russia conducted two successful tests of Avangard in 2016. Another, in October 2017, ended in failure when the rocket crashed a few seconds before hitting the target. One of the intelligence reports indicated that the planning cruise blocks of the rocket were installed on intercontinental ballistic missiles UR-100H (according to NATO classification - SS-19).

Also, US intelligence believes that during a single missile test, a mock warhead was installed. At the same time, CNBC claims that Russia is preparing for the fourth test - in the summer of 2018.

According to intelligence reports, Avangard is equipped with such defenses that allow it to overcome the latest missile defense systems. In addition, the rocket is characterized by high maneuverability and unpredictability, and its speed can be five times higher than the speed of sound.
Photos used:
https://vpk-news.ru/
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. figwam
    figwam 16 May 2018 16: 42
    +7
    familiar with US intelligence, claims that the Russian avant-garde hypersonic complex can probably be used for military purposes from the 2020 of the year.

    Thank you for notifying me.
    1. Hunter 2
      Hunter 2 16 May 2018 16: 46
      +3
      This is good, the question is in quantity ... Let them be afraid, the main thing is that there are not single copies!
      Stuff - can really change the balance and rhetoric of “partners”.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 16: 51
        +17
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Stuck - can really change the balance and rhetoric of “partners”

        Lech, partners from the coils have long flown, because the balance can be changed, but there is no rhetoric. No, well, of course you can, but for this, Putin needs to get Trump off his feet once in a belly. On the sidelines of course
        1. Hunter 2
          Hunter 2 16 May 2018 16: 58
          +9
          Sanya, I would like to see it! yes There will be no current - nothing! I can say one thing .... thanks to the GDP - for the Crimea, more - for nothing. Yes, and Crimea-decided with a fright ... 08.08.08. - I know the topic well, well it worked out. hi
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 17: 06
            +11
            Quote: Hunter 2
            , more - not at all.

            Do you want Navalny for president?
            1. Hunter 2
              Hunter 2 16 May 2018 17: 19
              +11
              Sanya, belay stop dying! am Bulk - the shame of our country !!! About people like him, Dostoevsky Fyodor Mikhailovich, wrote .... Demon is one definition!
              Do you really think that out of 143 million of our fellow citizens, there are no worthy people? The question is that some smart people dump them, others only raise their welfare (in business), because we have Power and People from time immemorial, the concepts are the opposite! Putin - There is a super Chance to enter the history of Our Country as a Superstar !!! For hundreds of generations, maybe even a saint - become! Just not with Medvedev’s cabinet and “friends”!
              Everything is insignificant! GLORY - ETERNAL! Maybe he will understand, he is not immortal.
              The current of the Macedonian - in our days, there is practically no, what is the sorrow! hi
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 17: 33
                +2
                Quote: Hunter 2
                Do you think that out of 143 millions, our fellow citizens are no worthy people?

                Of course there is the most worthy of me !!!! But the problem is that even here on the site many people don’t really like me (to put it mildly) laughing
                Quote: Hunter 2
                Just not with Medvedev’s cabinet and “friends”!

                Personally, I have one claim to Medvedev is Mudko, but I think Mudko is Putin’s serve.
                Quote: Hunter 2
                The current of the Macedonian - in our days, there is practically no, what is the sorrow!

                Choose me and you will be happy ....
                1. Hunter 2
                  Hunter 2 16 May 2018 17: 43
                  +5
                  You have a loose lifestyle! yes Anchors - NO! No. We need such a President - not needed! tongue but You work on yourself, and We will think! belay
                  Inspired by .... what
                  Choose Me, Choose Me ..
                  Bird of Happiness - Tomorrow! laughing
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 17: 45
                    +1
                    Quote: Hunter 2
                    Anchors - NO

                    There will be an anchor, have you seen the girls in the parade? repeat And not even one laughing
                    Quote: Hunter 2
                    Bird of Happiness - Tomorrow

                    Tomorrow I can change my mind, you know the mood wassat wassat
                    1. Hunter 2
                      Hunter 2 16 May 2018 17: 50
                      +3
                      So you’ll unleash it - the Vigorous War, according to your mood! sad
                      First, re-educate! laughing request
                      It drinks - quit, if you want to become President! stop
                      1. Alexander Romanov
                        Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 18: 01
                        +1
                        Quote: Hunter 2
                        First, re-educate!

                        First, girls with a parade. Then re-education.
                        Quote: Hunter 2
                        So you’ll unleash it - Vigorous War, according to your mood

                        Well, should I go down in history like Macedonian laughing
                        Quote: Hunter 2
                        It's to quit

                      2. Sergey39
                        Sergey39 16 May 2018 18: 35
                        +2
                        With such a surname only if emperor. Alexander 4.
          2. Slavianin_37
            Slavianin_37 16 May 2018 22: 44
            0
            About the Crimea with a fright, do not star! Why the hell do you know well! Go to the forest, once a hunter!
        2. Captain45
          Captain45 16 May 2018 20: 09
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          but for this Putin needs to kick Trump off his feet in her belly once

          With legs, but better in the head. lol It’s faster, otherwise you won’t break hamburgers in your belly.
          1. abrakadabre
            abrakadabre 16 May 2018 20: 57
            +1
            With legs, but better in the head. lol Faster, otherwise you won’t break hamburgers in your belly.
            Therefore, you need to beat below the hamburgers. Not necessarily completely lower - to sing falsetto. It is possible and a little lower - to urinate from politics.
        3. Alexey-74
          Alexey-74 17 May 2018 11: 25
          0
          It would be nice..... laughing or pain ....
      2. dorz
        dorz 16 May 2018 16: 53
        +1
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Stuff - can really change the balance and rhetoric of “partners”.

        Americans scare themselves, by 2022 the United States will have 9 cruise missiles.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 16 May 2018 17: 00
          +2
          Lost another 40000 tactical planning bombs AGM 154.
        2. The Siberian barber
          The Siberian barber 16 May 2018 17: 47
          +1
          At least a hundred thousand! So far, the Americans know that the "otvetka" will certainly fly, they will not dare to open military conflict
    2. Hire
      Hire 16 May 2018 16: 47
      +9
      In addition, the rocket is highly maneuverable and unpredictability

      - Where are we shooting?
      - Yes, hell knows. This "Vanguard" is so unpredictable ... Somewhere in that direction, and there he will decide. The main thing is that I did not decide to fly back. smile
    3. Bykov.
      Bykov. 16 May 2018 16: 57
      +1
      .
      Quote: figvam
      familiar with US intelligence, claims that the Russian avant-garde hypersonic complex can probably be used for military purposes from the 2020 of the year.

      Thank you for notifying me.

      Yeah keep up to date
  2. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 16: 44
    +8
    In general, the dates were written in the public domain. Cool US intelligence worked. All orders and new ranks.
    Media: "Vanguard" is planned to be adopted not later than 2019 yearhttps://topwar.ru/137873-smi-avangard-planiruetsy
    a-prinyat-na-vooruzhenie-ne-pozzhe-2019-goda.html

    We have a snitch on the site laughing
    1. x.andvlad
      x.andvlad 16 May 2018 16: 50
      +3
      Skripal, go mother. There is no “beginner” on him. wassat
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 16: 54
        +2
        Quote: x.andvlad
        Skripal, or mother

        Yes, not one of our knocks. The rat needs to be calculated.
        NEXUS LEXUS confesses, are you a snitch?
  3. sir_obs
    sir_obs 16 May 2018 16: 50
    +9
    seconds before hitting a target


    If a rocket on a hyper-crashed crashed in a few seconds, then it did hit the target ..
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 16: 58
      +1
      Quote: sir_obs
      If the rocket on the hypersauk crashed in a few seconds, then it did hit the target.

      This is a normal conclusion, what are we drinking?
      1. sir_obs
        sir_obs 16 May 2018 17: 05
        +5
        Scotch exclusively.
        Just nonsense about smoking.
        Count the speed per second. Even if after a few seconds the rocket fell apart, the totter and the warhead got exactly where it flew. Well, since they write about the crash, and not about the miss. So she fell, and therefore she fell to where she was going.
        This, by the way, is about the interception of hypersonic products. . Even if anti-aircraft gunners fall into such a missile, it will all the same fall where it is needed. Or, what they will shoot down with it must have a speed and mass comparable to the rocket itself.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 17: 16
          +1
          Quote: sir_obs
          Even if after a few seconds the rocket fell apart, the totter and the warhead got exactly where it flew. Well, since they write about the crash,

          An interesting version, you have good tape.
          Quote: sir_obs
          . So she fell, and therefore she fell to where she was going.

          Can I have a photo of adhesive tape?
          Quote: sir_obs
          Even if anti-aircraft gunners fall into such a missile, it will all the same fall where it should be.

          All the boys, now I only drink tape laughing
          1. sir_obs
            sir_obs 16 May 2018 17: 37
            +6
            Apparently it’s too early for you to drink alcohol. Or you have never before seen in reality how rockets fall not in the movies.
        2. Cube123
          Cube123 16 May 2018 17: 19
          +3
          The question is that when hit, the warhead is undermined, but when it crashes or is intercepted, no. There is a difference?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 17: 34
            +1
            Quote: Cube123
            The question is that when hit, the warhead is undermined, but when it crashes or is intercepted, no. There is a difference?

            I noticed the difference is that scotch tape is much better than vodka.
            1. sir_obs
              sir_obs 16 May 2018 17: 46
              +1
              At test launches, the warhead is just a blank. So that it does not explode in any way. At least in a crash, at least in a hit.
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 18: 03
                +1
                Quote: sir_obs
                but. So that it does not explode in any way.

                YBCh also does not explode smile Photo of your scotch tape sir
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Abram
    Abram 16 May 2018 16: 50
    +1
    there are no normal animators, they drew such a passion, and you are talking about some Vanguards. Lockheed Martin has beautiful videos and smart missiles
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 16 May 2018 17: 08
      +2
      Quote: Abram
      Lockheed Martin has beautiful videos and smart missiles

      Here licked, so licked laughing where are we to Hollywood. tongue
      1. Abram
        Abram 16 May 2018 17: 20
        0
        no, really, really can't do that? RCC LRASM. Music, smoke, thermal cable behind the rocket. the beauty
        1. net0103net
          net0103net 16 May 2018 17: 39
          0
          I have no words, I won’t even tell you anything. It’s good that I’m exactly Russian.
        2. g1washntwn
          g1washntwn 17 May 2018 09: 11
          0
          And don’t say, it’s slipping right between the radar rays :) The enemy has no satellites, only one radar is working (which acts as a captain’s fan) and the entire enemy crew is standing directly at sea, on the sidelines and smoking ...
  6. Comrade Beria
    Comrade Beria 16 May 2018 17: 05
    +1
    What will the liberals and non-brothers say about this? Cartoons no longer roll. lol
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 16 May 2018 17: 10
      +1
      Quote: Comrade Beria
      What liberals and non-brothers say about this

      Response
      Quote: Abram
      Lockheed Martin has beautiful videos and smart missiles
      1. Comrade Beria
        Comrade Beria 16 May 2018 17: 32
        0
        Yeah. There is always more money in someone else's wallet.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 16 May 2018 17: 47
          0
          Quote: Comrade Beria
          . There is always more money in someone else's wallet.

          Yes shy
        2. Captain45
          Captain45 16 May 2018 20: 13
          0
          Quote: Comrade Beria
          Yeah. There is always more money in someone else's wallet.

          Her, how many wolves do not feed, but the bear is still thicker laughing
  7. friend of animals
    friend of animals 16 May 2018 17: 20
    +4
    If the arms race turns into a cartoon race, I would only be for it.
  8. Dezinto
    Dezinto 16 May 2018 17: 24
    +1
    “Probably it could be.” “According to intelligence reports,” “referring to its sources familiar with US intelligence data.”

    Which reports? Which source?

    American TV, in its classic repertoire .......

    I also heard somewhere from someone that someone somewhere is somehow somehow, it’s not exact but it really can be.
    The entire article in the American media is ready.
  9. net0103net
    net0103net 16 May 2018 17: 29
    +1
    The heat of "receiving" scientific advances is declining. EG degenerates and Medvedev 4G-knopkotkari are on their way. Vanguard is our last leadership. Soviet specialists are retiring little by little and leaving us with the Vanguard. I don’t think that the vanguard is needed by the youth of the youth.
    1. Moskovit
      Moskovit 16 May 2018 18: 29
      +5
      Have you kids? If there is, did you bring them up with their headaches too?
      1. bk316
        bk316 16 May 2018 20: 04
        +4
        Have you kids? If there is, did you bring them up with their headaches too?

        Yes you to the point! Really calculated?
        He crucified the day before yesterday that there were no children because he could not feed .......
        Well, I hinted to him that this is the matter in him, and children and parents are different, so he was crucified on a split screen, not a word on the topic ...
        1. Moskovit
          Moskovit 16 May 2018 22: 47
          +1
          I have three. Nothing, not hungry. And one didn’t stop even getting loose))
      2. net0103net
        net0103net 17 May 2018 08: 03
        0
        Are you a Jew, or maybe a sympathizer? Well, then do not call your children golovopy, this will be seen in everything! It has always been and will be seen! )) Encourage them, support them in everything, especially those that are not dragged by either a nose or a snout! )) Well, then defend their "good name"! )))
        The cephalopods will be cephalopods for the rest of their life !! )))
    2. Warrior-80
      Warrior-80 17 May 2018 10: 08
      +1
      Well, you mutter like an old man, it was stated that in my opinion the "Dagger" was created by a team of young scientists
  10. Vard
    Vard 16 May 2018 17: 30
    +1
    Of course, I do not understand ballistic missiles ... But it seems like a warhead still flies at a higher speed ....
  11. NEXUS
    NEXUS 16 May 2018 17: 32
    +4
    In fact, all this was not particularly hidden. Otherwise, the whole world would not have notified the GDP. What new was said? It’s just that finally the stage of acceptance and awareness of the ass that hung over their missile defense system came to the mattresses.
  12. viktor.
    viktor. 16 May 2018 17: 53
    0
    Well, at least they specified the terms.
  13. Nitarius
    Nitarius 16 May 2018 18: 36
    0
    5 times the speed of sound .... but Chelyabinsk didn’t exceed it 25 times! miserable yap! Chelyabinsk was just a test))
    1. Lena Petrova
      Lena Petrova 16 May 2018 19: 25
      +1
      The first was the Tunguska, but quickly realized that they overdid it a bit with power. :))
      In general, I imagine shooting an object flying with a max. speed.
  14. TOR2
    TOR2 16 May 2018 21: 14
    0
    Reading about the "Vanguard" involuntarily an interesting thought is drawn. The development of BZHRK stopped at the stage of throwing tests, i.e. at almost a fork. But what if the BZHRK missiles are equipped with non-nuclear Vanguards. In this situation, the entire critical infrastructure of Western geyropa is in the affected area. A good gift for fans to unleash a limited war game.
  15. Old26
    Old26 16 May 2018 23: 29
    +3
    Quote: sir_obs
    seconds before hitting a target


    If a rocket on a hyper-crashed crashed in a few seconds, then it did hit the target ..

    In the article crap regarding emergency start
    Another, in October 2017, ended in failure when the rocket crashed a few seconds before hitting the target.

    This cannot be just physically because the rocket ceases to exist approximately 7 minutes after launch. Then only blocks fly. Entrance to the atmosphere at a speed of about 14-15M. When speed drops to about 6-8M, software maneuvering can be carried out. The radar seeker turns on already at a speed of about 3-4M

    Quote: viktor.
    Well, at least they specified the terms.

    Actually, our Moscow Region announced this several months ago. So deadlines are an open secret. Moreover, there is no guarantee that it is in 2020. Perhaps later. It was announced that at the end of 2019, Sarmat’s starting minimum could be put on combat duty. But whether it will be "Vanguard" or not - is still unknown
  16. Old26
    Old26 16 May 2018 23: 38
    0
    Quote: TOR2
    Reading about the "Vanguard" involuntarily an interesting thought is drawn. The development of BZHRK stopped at the stage of throwing tests, i.e. at almost a fork. But what if the BZHRK missiles are equipped with non-nuclear Vanguards. In this situation, the entire critical infrastructure of Western geyropa is in the affected area. A good gift for fans to unleash a limited war game.

    The probability is close to zero. New missiles at the BZHRK will be about the same class as the Yars. So, by their dimensions, this combat unit is unlikely to fit there. In addition, the development of the complex was postponed until 2026. And this means that it was deployed in 2030, not earlier. And why not put a nuclear block on it. Anyway, it will be offset. Although the topic was developed taking into account non-nuclear military equipment
  17. Zomanus
    Zomanus 17 May 2018 00: 23
    0
    Well, it is clear that there are not hundreds of such pieces.
    And that this is really a question of the future, since so far we have enough current strategic nuclear forces.
  18. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 17 May 2018 07: 16
    0
    Why they talk about Vanguard as a rocket. This is a planning guided warhead, which can be, if necessary, mounted on any missile. While talking about the UR-100 and Sarmatia.
  19. Old26
    Old26 17 May 2018 07: 55
    0
    Quote: Jurkovs
    Why they talk about Vanguard as a rocket. This is a planning guided warhead, which can be, if necessary, mounted on any missile. While talking about the UR-100 and Sarmatia.

    About the "Vanguard" as a rocket, our media and all sorts of different ICSPERDS speak.
    The name "Vanguard" refers directly to military equipment. The work was initially carried out as part of a large number of research projects, which ultimately resulted in OCD under the name JUMPERif my sclerosis does not fail me
    The tests were carried out on a modernized rocket 15A35, extended by almost 7 meters. They fired from the PR of the 13th division (EMNIP of 2 mine launchers was converted into silos 15P771. After the upgrade, the missile received the designation 15A35-71 or 15A71, subsequently replaced by 15Y71.
    The block can be equipped with both nuclear and conventional charge.
    Plan to deploy on a new heavy rocket SARMAT. Moreover, I am delirious that a rocket will carry either 10-15 conventional warheads or almost 24 Avangard, you should not believe it. Another nonsense of the media. The number of such blocks, based on their geometry and dimensions Sarmata unlikely to be more than 3-4.
    So on any - hardly. Even the UR-100N UTTH (and not the UR-100) will also have to be upgraded, like their silos
  20. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 17 May 2018 11: 29
    0
    Well, if this intelligence is close to the sources in the CIA .... then the guys will tell you a terrible secret - the information in your intelligence is not correct, regarding the performance characteristics of the "Vanguard" missiles do not fly 5 times faster than sound, but: The latest Russian hypersonic missile "Vanguard" , the speed of which exceeds the Mach number (approximately corresponds to the speed of sound) by 20 times, makes the American missile defense system absolutely useless, whose anti-missiles have a maximum speed of 5 mach ............ Well, something like this .... ..... soldier
  21. Old26
    Old26 17 May 2018 19: 20
    0
    Quote: Alexey-74
    Well, if this intelligence is close to the sources in the CIA .... then the guys will tell you a terrible secret - the information in your intelligence is not correct, regarding the performance characteristics of the "Vanguard" missiles do not fly 5 times faster than sound, but: The latest Russian hypersonic missile "Vanguard" , the speed of which exceeds the Mach number (approximately corresponds to the speed of sound) by 20 times, makes the American missile defense system absolutely useless, whose anti-missiles have a maximum speed of 5 mach ............ Well, something like this .... ..... soldier

    PANCAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    There is no such rocket - Vanguard..... Vanguard is the name BATTLE EQUIPMENT rockets. It flies in different parts of the trajectory at different speeds. In the middle section - 20MAt atmospheric entry speed drops to about 14-15МWhen this unit enters in dense layers - speed decreases even more - to about 6-8M. At the final stage, when homing systems begin to operate - speed in general SUPERSONIC

    No need how FOLDER to repeat what is being broadcast to us on TV screens, even if the President also said it. There is such a science - PHYSICS called .... Here from it and build on your reasoning (if there are no other sources of knowledge), and do not repeat what is voiced on TV as a mantra