In the United States called the "best Russian fighter"

29
Soviet Su-27 and its modifications are the best fighters of the fourth generation, in service with Russia, China and India, leads Lenta.ru report opinion of American expert Sebastien Roblin.





For four decades, the Flanker jets (the name of the Su-27 according to NATO classification) were the best Russian fighters of the fourth generation, as well as the two most populated countries of the world - China and India,
writes roblin.

According to him, Su-27, created as an analogue of the American McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle (started operating in the 1976 year), has “long range, high speed, heavy armament, advanced avionics and excellent maneuverability and served as the basis for many other fighter options ".

The expert notes that “the new fighter (it began to be fully used in the 1985 year), which received spacious fuel tanks and a pair of AL-31F engines, developed a speed of more than 2 Mach numbers and had a range of about 1,5 thousands of kilometers”.

Separately, he noted the “Doppler radar HNNUMX“ Sword ”with a range of up to 001 kilometers, an infrared search and tracking system, as well as an air-to-air missile P-130, which received Su-73”.

Robin also recalled that Su-27M, Su-27, Su-30, Su-33 and Shenyang J-35 fighters were created based on the Su-11.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, impoverished Russia sold the Su-27 to China in exchange for food. Then Beijing received a license to produce its own clone Shenyang J-11,
he explained.

Subsequently, according to the expert, Flanker (in the Su-30 version) landed in India, where, in tests, “often proved to be better than fourth-generation American fighters”.

Flanker-B (Su-27M), apparently, has a slight advantage over F-15 in armament, defense and close combat,
writes roblin.

He also notes that in the last Flanker (Su-35) differences in the American and Russian military doctrines are clearly visible: “if the former relies on stealth, the latter prefers maneuverability”.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    16 May 2018 12: 50
    Roblin also recalled that, based on the Su-27, Su-27M, Su-30, Su-33, Su-35 fighters were created

    Very good and famous line of Sushki !!! good
    1. +3
      16 May 2018 13: 09
      Su-34 forgotten, this is the same T-10.
      1. +3
        16 May 2018 13: 13
        just explo (just explo) Today, 13: 09 ↑ New
        Su-34 forgotten, this is the same T-10.

        Su-27 - Wikipedia
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Су-27
        Su-27 (factory code T-10С; NATO codification: Flanker-B

        something like this...
        1. +1
          17 May 2018 08: 37
          and ??????
          Or do you want to say that the Su-34 is not T-10 times the letter C is not present?
          and the AK-74 is no longer a Kalashnikov assault rifle? otherwise he doesn’t have the letter M as in the word AKM.
  2. +6
    16 May 2018 12: 51
    It is a pity that the ruble is not a dollar and we do not have a machine! It would be for you and 27 and 30 and much more. Yes, and take your bullshit together with our constitution and all free-breathing. am
    1. +2
      16 May 2018 12: 52
      the discrepancies in the American and Russian military doctrines are clearly visible: "if the first relies on stealth, the second prefers maneuverability."

      The American doctrine is designed for the unpunished democratization of developing countries.
  3. +1
    16 May 2018 12: 52
    nice to read
    1. 0
      16 May 2018 14: 38
      Quote: LSA57
      nice to read

      Duc for that NI and created, not for military analytics. Tele7 will soon begin to quote ...
      1. +1
        16 May 2018 14: 46
        Quote: Puncher
        Duc for that NI and created, not for military analytics.

        Something I didn’t get a link about NI anywhere
        1. 0
          16 May 2018 17: 40
          Quote: LSA57
          Something I didn’t get a link about NI anywhere

          And you take a little interest in the publications of expert Sebastian Roblin and you don’t have to look for anything. And so it will be clear that this
          "The National Interest".
          Here's a tip:
          https://inosmi.ru/authors/sebastien_roblin/
  4. +5
    16 May 2018 12: 53
    With hints, with omissions, but the expert from the mattress admits that the planes from Russia are the best in the world.
    1. +1
      16 May 2018 13: 10
      he did not say anything about the world. only about the fact that the best that is in service with the Russian Federation, India and China.
      1. +2
        16 May 2018 13: 20
        Read carefully, it says that the Su-30 in India "often performed better than fourth-generation American fighters." Yes
        1. +1
          16 May 2018 21: 07
          always showed
    2. 0
      16 May 2018 14: 41
      Quote: Egorovich
      With hints, with omissions, but the expert from the mattress admits that the planes from Russia are the best in the world.

      Do you really consider NI "mattress experts"?
  5. MPN
    +14
    16 May 2018 12: 53
    According to him, the Su-27, created as an analogue of the American McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle
    Specialists are already tired ..., well, not a single gram is an analogue, but of the same class to the point of F-15
    1. 0
      17 May 2018 08: 03
      Can be compared with the F-22. But the F-15E / SE is serious in the multi-purpose 4 ++ class and expose it. He definitely needs to be reckoned with without any if.
  6. +4
    16 May 2018 12: 54
    The usual "analysis" in the popular - comic book moron style of American publications for people.
  7. +1
    16 May 2018 12: 55
    Again type article !!!
  8. +2
    16 May 2018 13: 06
    Russia sold planes to China for food? Nerd.
    1. +3
      16 May 2018 19: 01
      This is you nerd, since you believe everything that is written.
      The brain must be turned on.
  9. +1
    16 May 2018 13: 47
    Mdaa Majnumara, in my opinion, will now be left without bread. F-15E is generally the shock version of the F-15 !!! And here the Su-27 which he does not compete with the word at all. Su-30 yes, Su-34 yes, but not Su-27 and Su-35. Just comparing the nomenclature of weapons and tactics of application.
    If the Su-27 was created in commemoration of it, then the F-15C. It is not the same. Neither in practice, nor in armament. hi
    1. +1
      16 May 2018 21: 09
      The MiG-25 is somehow more similar to the F-15, though it flew earlier (higher and faster).
    2. 0
      17 May 2018 08: 08
      E is not a 100% clean drummer, but a multi-purpose one, like the SU-27, just because he was honed to strike functions and did not participate in air battles does not mean that he completely forgot how to aerial combat. F-15SE is still there for gaining superiority in the air, please compare, this is not a comparison of a tractor with a tank.
      1. 0
        19 May 2018 03: 55
        I agree to half, the Su-27 can’t throw itself with high-precision, But the Su-34 can. Even Su-30 owns an affordable arsenal.
        Therefore, he wrote that the comparison is incorrect.
  10. 0
    16 May 2018 14: 21
    The whole world knows that Russian planes are the best in the world.
  11. 0
    16 May 2018 14: 32
    In the US called

    And what, admins of VO already are embarrassed to name a source? Or was the NI reference finally a sign of delitantism?
  12. +2
    16 May 2018 15: 34
    The teachings in Langley.

    That's it!

    And the opinion of the United States about our aviation can not be read.
  13. 0
    16 May 2018 20: 11
    Oh, yes, what do they think