Military Review

Virginia class submarine laid in USA

37
At the shipyard of Electric Boat Company (part of General Dynamics), a groundbreaking ceremony was held for a Virginia-class multipurpose nuclear-powered submarine USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN-795) Korabli.eu with reference to the press service of the Pentagon.


Virginia class submarine laid in USA


According to the agency, “the ship’s sponsor is Darleen Greenert (Darlene Greenert), retired admiral's wife Jonathan Greenert (Jonathan William Grinert), who was the head of the US Navy naval operations from 2011 to 2015.

"Her initials were left on the base plate, which will always be on the submarine," - said in a statement.

SSN-795 will be the second ship in the submarine fleet, which is named after Admiral Hyman George Rickover, known as the "father of the atomic fleet." The first submarine named after the admiral was the USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN 709) of the Los Angeles class, which was removed from the Navy in 2006.

It is also reported that this year the USS Indiana submarine (SSN 789) will be handed over to the customer, and the USS Vermont keel laying ceremony (SSN 792) is scheduled for the fourth quarter.
Photos used:
http://www.korabli.eu
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Russia
    Russia 15 May 2018 15: 51
    +5
    There is money, and what not to build.

    "Her initials were left on the mortgage plate, which will be permanently located on the submarine."
    Here it was necessary to lay it instead of the embedded plate.
    1. dorz
      dorz 15 May 2018 16: 02
      +1
      Quote: Rusland
      There is money, and what not to build.

      In total, they plan to build 30 submarines of this type. Russian Ash-trees are two times cheaper and carry 30 KR against 12 American.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 15 May 2018 16: 23
        +8
        The ash trees have not yet carried anything; there are few of them, only two.
        1. Tiksi-3
          Tiksi-3 15 May 2018 18: 31
          +3
          Quote: Vadim237
          Ash-trees still don’t carry anything - few of them, only two

          one ... only one so far .... kazan is not ready yet ..
      2. ZVO
        ZVO 15 May 2018 16: 52
        +2
        Quote: dorz
        Quote: Rusland
        There is money, and what not to build.

        In total, they plan to build 30 submarines of this type. Russian Ash-trees are two times cheaper and carry 30 KR against 12 American.


        How much does a Kazan boat cost?
        Joke ... It has grown a lot in value from the initial investment ...
        And the final price has not stopped and continues to grow
        And it’s already approaching a figure of over 5 billion dollars ...
        1. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 15 May 2018 17: 52
          +5
          Quote: ZVO
          And it’s already approaching a figure of over 5 billion dollars ...

          one "boat" ?? recourse recourse and where did you find such info ?? what wassat wassat
          1. ZVO
            ZVO 21 June 2018 07: 34
            +1
            Quote: Nikolai Grek
            Quote: ZVO
            And it’s already approaching a figure of over 5 billion dollars ...

            one "boat" ?? recourse recourse and where did you find such info ?? what wassat wassat


            And you joke, joke ... In which year the estimate was already 200 billion rubles and what was the course for then.
            1. Nikolai Grek
              Nikolai Grek 21 June 2018 20: 58
              +1
              Quote: ZVO
              Quote: Nikolai Grek
              Quote: ZVO
              And it’s already approaching a figure of over 5 billion dollars ...

              one "boat" ?? recourse recourse and where did you find such info ?? what wassat wassat


              And you joke, joke ... In which year the estimate was already 200 billion rubles and what was the course for then.

              I joked, but did not find confirmation for your tales !! wink yes do you even share the info, which shows the price of one of our "boat" in 5 lard bucks !! wassat wassat wassat
              1. ZVO
                ZVO 21 June 2018 21: 26
                +1
                Quote: Nikolai Grek
                to your fairy tales !! wink yes do you even share the info, which shows the price of one of our "boat" in 5 lard bucks !! wassat wassat wassat


                Do not lie...
                This is searched on the official TV channel Zvezda ze 0,000001 seconds ...

                https://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201503181
                645-3jkk.htm? Act = print
                1. Nikolai Grek
                  Nikolai Grek 21 June 2018 23: 06
                  +1
                  Quote: ZVO
                  Quote: Nikolai Grek
                  to your fairy tales !! wink yes do you even share the info, which shows the price of one of our "boat" in 5 lard bucks !! wassat wassat wassat


                  Do not lie...
                  This is searched on the official TV channel Zvezda ze 0,000001 seconds ...

                  https://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201503181
                  645-3jkk.htm? Act = print

                  So I asked with info, but not with balabolstvo !!! wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing

                  According to the interlocutor of the agency, the first nuclear submarine of the project, Severodvinsk, will complete the tests in 2012 and will become part of the Navy. In 2015, the construction of the head submarine of the modernized project 885M Kazan “low noise”, laid down in 2009, will be completed. By 2021, another five submarines totaling 885 billion rubles will be built under the 150M project.

                  The total cost of seven submarines of the Ash project exceeds 200 billion rubles. According to a source from ITAR-TASS, one submarine of project 885M costs one and a half to two times more expensive than submarines of project 955 Borey.

                  https://lenta.ru/news/2012/04/25/yasen/
                  1. ZVO
                    ZVO 25 June 2018 12: 11
                    0
                    Quote: Nikolai Grek

                    The total cost of seven submarines of the Ash project exceeds 200 billion rubles. According to a source from ITAR-TASS, one submarine of project 885M costs one and a half to two times more expensive than submarines of project 955 Borey.

                    https://lenta.ru/news/2012/04/25/yasen/


                    You are the dates of the news that you post watch?
                    You are trying to look like the Fat Troll ... But alas ...
                    The truth is not quite understanding. how to "be on fire" on trifles ...

                    Your news is 12 years old.
                    mine - 2015 ...
                    When the boat has not even been built yet, it will be commissioned only after one and a half to two years ...
                    And already in 2015 over 200 billion was spent on it. Since 2009, when the dollar was 30 ...
                    1. Nikolai Grek
                      Nikolai Grek 25 June 2018 18: 40
                      +1
                      Quote: ZVO
                      Quote: Nikolai Grek

                      The total cost of seven submarines of the Ash project exceeds 200 billion rubles. According to a source from ITAR-TASS, one submarine of project 885M costs one and a half to two times more expensive than submarines of project 955 Borey.

                      https://lenta.ru/news/2012/04/25/yasen/


                      You are the dates of the news that you post watch?
                      You are trying to look like the Fat Troll ... But alas ...
                      The truth is not quite understanding. how to "be on fire" on trifles ...

                      Your news is 12 years old.
                      mine - 2015 ...
                      When the boat has not even been built yet, it will be commissioned only after one and a half to two years ...
                      And already in 2015 over 200 billion was spent on it. Since 2009, when the dollar was 30 ...

                      You will be fatter troll !! what wassat wassat did you spend 200 billion on "this one boat" or with someone together ?? what wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
    2. Vadivak
      Vadivak 15 May 2018 17: 31
      +5
      Quote: Rusland
      There is money, and what not to build.

      Darlene Greenerth sponsor. What's so bad We have a lot of people who have money ...
    3. Lena Petrova
      Lena Petrova 15 May 2018 17: 56
      0
      A woman on a ship is not the best option.
  2. BZTM
    BZTM 15 May 2018 15: 55
    +14
    According to the agency, “the ship’s sponsor is Darleen Greenert (Darlene Greenert), retired admiral's wife Jonathan Greenert (Jonathan William Grinert), who was the head of the US Navy naval operations from 2011 to 2015.
    good Krasava, Darlene !!! And where are all these “our” Abramovich’s, derispaska and all sorts of different, that they still drink blood from the people to this day? (OUR) account, you can build the Open Ocean Fleet ... am
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 15 May 2018 18: 38
      +5
      Quote: BZTM
      And where are all these “our” Abramovich’s, derispaska and all sorts of

      There is simply no one to offer such conditions for "voluntary" financing of the state defense order that they cannot refuse.
  3. NEXUS
    NEXUS 15 May 2018 15: 55
    +3
    The British Astyud decided to build another one, they laid the next Virgin mattresses ... and our Kazan was never transferred to the fleet. Hmm ..
  4. Ivan Tarava
    Ivan Tarava 15 May 2018 15: 57
    +8
    They build everything, lay it. Do they even know that we have a hypersuppersonic dagger? Call them someone, explain for the whole ... For a long time Polonium did not smell
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 15 May 2018 15: 59
      +6
      Quote: Ivan Tarava
      Do they even know that we have a hypersuppersonic dagger?

      What side is the dagger to the multipurpose submarine? How were you going to destroy the adversary’s multi-purpose submarines with the Dagger?
      1. Dezinto
        Dezinto 15 May 2018 16: 04
        +6
        I don’t understand what this banter is for? request
        First I didn’t understand and then I didn’t understand why stick this phrase about our weapons everywhere?
        And thirdly, Andrei is right about what the "dagger" and submarines have to do with it?
        There are other solutions for such cases.



        1. Ivan Tarava
          Ivan Tarava 15 May 2018 16: 12
          +4
          Well, yes, I agree, bust. It’s just that the mood went down, you thought you would appreciate it.
          A flurry is no longer relevant, although I heard that they want to use it again. A flurry at such a speed is so noisy that the entire World Ocean hears it, and besides, there is no GOS due to the cavitator.
        2. NEXUS
          NEXUS 15 May 2018 16: 25
          0
          Quote: DEZINTO
          There are other solutions for such cases.

          Flurry, used with bullseye. The maximum depth of the course (up to 30 m) does not allow hitting submarines at great depths.
          The bow of the torpedo does not allow you to install a homing head on it.
          The dump could be equipped with a conventional warhead, but ... A low probability of hitting a target with a conventional warhead and without a seeker.
          To destroy the nuclear submarine, there is a Case, a Physicist, and the same Kit (in a modernized version).
      2. Ivan Tarava
        Ivan Tarava 15 May 2018 16: 06
        +5
        But why doesn’t he swim under water on a hypersport? But what about 10 years of great victories? Yes, they just don’t tell us about all the secret features of the Dagger. Well, we’ll blow up their boats with the harpsichord, they’re not in vain trying. Well, in general, you understand. We must not lose in any way. Do not forget about 10 years of great victories, the main thing is that they would not forget to warn at what point the countdown will begin.
        1. Dezinto
          Dezinto 15 May 2018 16: 21
          +2
          But why doesn’t he swim under water on a hypersport?

          How stingy you are today. wink
          Indeed, there are different moods. hi
          1. Ivan Tarava
            Ivan Tarava 15 May 2018 16: 28
            +3
            Indeed, such weather is good, the sun is shining, and I am evil. I’ll go to the river to wash myself to wash off negative energies. Only without all of these there, sho means there somewhere it’s the same, you need to wash yourself.
            1. Dezinto
              Dezinto 15 May 2018 16: 31
              +1
              Only without all these

              Yes, of course, without any of these. Really go freshen up. I also think that the sea will go to bathe. Because sitting at the computer for so long is certainly harmful. As a result, you begin to annoy yourself. And nature and fresh air remove it all. hi
              1. Ivan Tarava
                Ivan Tarava 15 May 2018 16: 49
                +2
                That's for sure. Nature brings us balance.
                1. Dezinto
                  Dezinto 15 May 2018 16: 53
                  +2
                  That's for sure. Nature brings us balance.

                  Yes. Yes.
                  And I am up to this beauty fifteen minutes to go. But laziness ass tear off the chair. laughing

                  1. Ivan Tarava
                    Ivan Tarava 15 May 2018 16: 56
                    +2
                    I would live right on the beach.
      3. Piramidon
        Piramidon 15 May 2018 18: 52
        +1
        Quote: NEXUS
        What side is the dagger to the multipurpose submarine?

        Well, he heard something somewhere. Without delving into or having no idea about the subject of discussion - spoke out. There are now those in VO, like mushrooms on a stump. The site has turned into a bunch of "experts" at the level of the middle group of kindergarten and cheers-patriots with slogans such as "throw all vigorous bombs", provide all the Yankees with diapers, "knock everything down to flies and mosquitoes that came close to our borders" ... etc. Previously, people with great experience in military service were present here. Reading the comments was a pleasure. And now only Zionists, such as the "professor", two companies have dug in here.
    2. Topotun
      Topotun 15 May 2018 17: 23
      +4
      And how many of those “Daggers”? The trouble is that we simply may not be allowed to completely revive the Russian Armed Forces. Too many things around us. The feeling that the bonfire will soon burn more and more. Yes, it’s not the first time that Russia has fought and adjusted the brains of various idiots, but the price is ... And most importantly, it would not have happened that our leadership would simply merge at the start of a serious machach ...
  5. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 15 May 2018 16: 10
    +1
    Let them build, we are not able to interfere with them, the main thing is that it then shakes our nerves less.
  6. net0103net
    net0103net 15 May 2018 16: 52
    0
    And let these "leaders of peace and democracy" also build more - more boats, more problems later))
  7. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 15 May 2018 16: 57
    +5
    "which is named after Admiral Hyman George Rickover,
    known as the "father of the atomic fleet" "

    Admiral Chaim Rickover. From Russia, by the way.
    (similar to Arkady Raikin in his youth? smile )
  8. Abram
    Abram 15 May 2018 17: 04
    +2
    It would be interesting to see the whole ceremony. Judging by the photo, people are simple, without show-offs, smiles are not artificial, even the wall is not plastered smile
  9. Alf
    Alf 15 May 2018 21: 44
    0
    According to the agency, “the ship’s sponsor is Darleen Greenert (Darlene Greenert),

    Is she going to build this metalwork from her own pocket? The meaning of the concept of "sponsor" is just that.
  10. Old26
    Old26 15 May 2018 23: 44
    0
    Quote: Alf
    According to the agency, “the ship’s sponsor is Darleen Greenert (Darlene Greenert),

    Is she going to build this metalwork from her own pocket? The meaning of the concept of "sponsor" is just that.

    Of course not. In such cases, they mean by the sponsor something like "mother of the boat". She then breaks a bottle of champagne during the descent. Something like this. And EMNIP is one of the few cases in recent years when the Americans changed their rules in naming a boat.