Military Review

China has told about plans to supply the world's largest amphibious aircraft

33
Corporation aviation Industry (AVIC, China) expects to begin commercial delivery to customers of the world's largest amphibious aircraft, the AG2022, created by it by 600, reports RIA News Statement by Chief Designer Juan Lincai.




We are trying to obtain a certificate of airworthiness of the aircraft from the Civil Aviation Authority for the 2021 year, and by the 2022 year to begin delivery to
said Lincai.

According to him, this year the corporation plans to “carry out an airplane flight in July from the Zhuhai base in Jingmen (Hubei province), where the aircraft will later make the first flight from the surface of the water.”

Recall that in March 2017-th AG600 successfully made its first test flight from the ground. The assembly of the aircraft was completed in the summer of 2016. It is designed to extinguish fires and conduct rescue operations on the water. Able to take on board 12 tons of water in 20 seconds. Maximum take-off weight - 53,5 t, hull length - 39,3 m, wingspan - 38,8 m, maximum flight range - 4,5 thou. Km.

It is also reported that “AG600 can be equipped with additional equipment for monitoring the marine environment, passenger and freight traffic, as well as mineral exploration”.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 14 May 2018 09: 16
    +5
    China has told about plans to supply the world's largest amphibious aircraft
    I don’t care ... we’ll continue to collect the BE-200 piece by piece ... and we were planning to deliver it to America, they were saying ten states on board .. but the bureaucrats are stronger than the industrialists.
    1. Teberii
      Teberii 14 May 2018 09: 20
      +8
      The Chinese they will be able to sell, and we will watch how the market is absorbed.
      1. Separ DNR
        Separ DNR 14 May 2018 10: 09
        +4
        Quote: Teberii
        The Chinese they will be able to sell, and we will watch how the market is absorbed.


        An example of how to work, taking care of promoting your product on the market:
        “K.L. Shustov with his sons "
        This Yerevan brand has become famous around the world thanks to its ingenious (and kind of aggressive yes ) advertising campaign. At the very beginning of the XNUMXth century, Mr. Shustov sent “agents” to European “business trips”.
        Nikolai Nikolaevich Shustov selected two dozen well-educated young people as agents, for a good pay. And at his own expense he sent them to the countries of Western Europe and to North America.

        It was the duty of these agents to go with the lady to an expensive restaurant: he began to order, and when the serving was approaching the end, he was obliged to ask for a “bottle of Shustovsky cognac.” In response to the waiter’s statement that no one had ever heard of such a brand, the young man raised his eyebrows in surprise and, pretending to not believe his ears, asked again:
        “Like, you don’t have Shustovsky cognac, the best cognac in the world?” belay belay belay
        Having received an affirmative answer, he got up, apologized to the lady for bringing her to this “institution”, paid the bill, although they did not touch anything, and, having promised never to visit this restaurant again, left the institution.

        And a month later, the owners of most European and further American restaurants began to order the Armenian Shustov cognacs.


        And then they cluck: "The markets are closed for us, the markets are closed for us" ...

        A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS.
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 14 May 2018 10: 21
          +2
          Dear ... well, this is a bike with a beard! A decent restaurant doesn’t care what a man in a decent suit said but without a name .. a decent restaurant used the famous brands of cognac that respected people loved! One visitor in a jacket is smaller, the other is bigger .. and here dear regular customers, yes ... but it wasn’t Shustov’s agents. By the way .. on the sign NL Shustov .. and in your repost N.N .. how to understand this? wink ?
          1. Separ DNR
            Separ DNR 14 May 2018 10: 23
            +1
            Quote: igorka357
            Dear .. well this is a bike with a beard!

            There are facts that this is so?
            Quote: igorka357
            on the sign of N. L. Shustov .. and in your repost N. N. .. how to understand this?

            "Shustov and sons" ....
            1. igorka357
              igorka357 14 May 2018 12: 08
              0
              Of course there is, I’ll drop it into your mail! What does Shustov and sons have to do with it, if I asked a question about the name of my middle name? I don’t quite understand your message! This is the same as I’ll come to KODO, or Fahrenheit in a good suit, and order cognac from "Igoreha" for 8 thousand ye ... they will look at me like a fool .. then they will break through what brandy they are and not just look, but they will consider me as such !!!
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 14 May 2018 10: 15
        +1
        The market for which, amphibious aircraft .. I beg you, it does not stand in the first place .. but closer to the end! And before it’s "all but lost" to scream .. let them first put out the fires off .. like our BE-200s! Besides ..he is also half passenger .. laughing, I mean Chinese! Compare turbojet, and turboprop!
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 14 May 2018 10: 31
          +1
          Relatively small relatively small fire / rescue workers sell well.

          They are cheaper to operate. More flexible - well, that is, the Be-200 to drive to the task (for example, to save fishermen or put out a small fire) is very expensive and covers the task, and the baby is normal.

          Be-200 and other big ones can’t afford banal. They will be used say 3-5 weeks in a year (and a bad year) - the rest of the time to eat money.

          A turboprop is, by the way, more economically interesting.
          1. kytx
            kytx 15 May 2018 08: 57
            0
            No fire can be extinguished from such a baby, and fishermen can’t save the sea excitement for him. Patrol and fire brigade on the edge of land to land everything that it is good for.
  2. svp67
    svp67 14 May 2018 09: 20
    +5
    "Beriev" AU !!!!!!!
    1. Separ DNR
      Separ DNR 14 May 2018 09: 26
      +9
      Quote: svp67
      "Beriev" AU !!!!!!!

      And what is “Beriev”? He, as the "top managers" said, so he does ... You can’t jump above their heads. No. be blown away.

      Obviously, for them (menagers), the development of hydroaviation is not relevant ...
      1. svp67
        svp67 14 May 2018 09: 32
        +4
        Quote: Separ DNR
        Obviously, for them (menagers), the development of hydroaviation is not relevant ...

        Apparently Russia is not a maritime power ...
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 14 May 2018 09: 33
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      "Beriev" AU !!!!!!!

      40 years soon after he died ... why are you yelling? request
      1. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 14 May 2018 10: 32
        +1
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        Quote: svp67
        "Beriev" AU !!!!!!!

        40 years soon after he died ... why are you yelling? request

        Are the quotes small? Ali bite a fly?
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 14 May 2018 11: 52
          +1
          Quote: Mavrikiy

          Are the quotes small? Ali bite a fly?

  3. LMN
    LMN 14 May 2018 09: 34
    +3
    And why does the Russian Federation need such an aircraft? Develop, invest in production what
    There is little hope for export, because IMHO specific goods hurt.
    NATO won our Ruslans freight (freight) to transport bulky goods and nothing. They themselves do not build such an aircraft, because it is not economically feasible.
    1. DenZ
      DenZ 14 May 2018 10: 05
      +2
      Well, maybe this is exactly what is not needed, but with hydroaviation and the truth is that we do not have a Be-200 (and that’s all the Ministry of Emergencies) and old Be-12. It seems to have forgotten nothing.
      1. faiver
        faiver 14 May 2018 16: 55
        +1
        old people Be-12 remained a few units ...
    2. Separ DNR
      Separ DNR 14 May 2018 10: 33
      +4
      Quote: LMN
      And why does the Russian Federation need such an aircraft? Develop, invest in production

      And you, become Ukraine, then you do not need a FIG yes
      1. LMN
        LMN 14 May 2018 10: 50
        +3
        Quote: Separ DNR
        Quote: LMN
        And why does the Russian Federation need such an aircraft? Develop, invest in production

        And you, become Ukraine, then you do not need a FIG yes

        And what about Ukraine? request Somehow in this regard, comparing with Russia is completely incorrect lol

        Apparently we do not have big needs for such aircraft, since we are not investing. Why did I ask: why do we need such aircraft?
        The current comes to mind to extinguish fires .. but again, for the sake of this, invest in development and production .. No.
        1. Separ DNR
          Separ DNR 14 May 2018 10: 55
          +4
          Quote: LMN
          The current comes to mind to extinguish fires .. but again, for the sake of this, invest in development and production ..

          And with the rescue service of those in distress at sea, are you all right? Equipped and equipped with 100% s the best?
          God forbid, of course, but if something like the tragedy of Komsomolets happened, and if there’s war too ...

          Someone will tear the hair on his head, and someone sprinkle with ashes. yes
          1. LMN
            LMN 14 May 2018 11: 13
            +3
            Quote: Separ DNR
            Quote: LMN
            The current comes to mind to extinguish fires .. but again, for the sake of this, invest in development and production ..

            And with the rescue service of those in distress at sea, are you all right? Equipped and equipped with 100% s the best?
            God forbid, of course, but if something like the tragedy of Komsomolets happened, and if there’s war too ...

            Someone will tear the hair on his head, and someone sprinkle with ashes. yes

            But what prevents them from upgrading existing ones? If they cope with their functions, which are not so many. Won An-2 still flies.

            With regard to the rescue of nuclear submarines or possible participation in future wars ... you have baffled me lol
  4. AshiSolo
    AshiSolo 14 May 2018 09: 40
    0
    The assembly of the aircraft was completed in the summer of 206.

    What entertainers, these ancient Chinese :) Correct please.
  5. askort154
    askort154 14 May 2018 09: 42
    +2
    Chinese is the "largest", and the water intake is the same as that of the Be-200 (12 tons in 20 seconds).
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 14 May 2018 10: 33
      0
      And why more? Here it comes down to necessity. If desired, you can expand to the full extent - but why?

      By the way, he will have more problems with the fence than Be thinks. For a fool is much more. And there will be big problems with the selection of sites for water intake.
      1. jjj
        jjj 14 May 2018 10: 45
        0
        The question is in terms of operation. How long can the design of the splashdown at sea withstand the waves. Since amphibian is "the largest in the world", there is virtually no experience. There is only a historical fact that all hydro-giants did not live long
      2. askort154
        askort154 14 May 2018 11: 33
        0
        donavi49 ....And why more? Here it rests - in necessity. If desired, you can expand to the full extent - but why?

        He has more take-off weight due to the "dimensions" and fuel (by 10 -13 tons)
        The fence is mainly from the sea, where take-off and landing distances are not limited. Only wave height. And these parameters are the same as the Be-200 = 2-3 points. That is, its only advantage from the Be is 200, its radius of action, due to a large amount of fuel and turboprop engines. (for now, purely theoretically). hi
  6. PValery53
    PValery53 14 May 2018 10: 08
    0
    Quote: askort154
    Chinese is the "largest", and the water intake is the same as that of the Be-200 (12 tons in 20 seconds).

    - "You cannot harness a horse and a trembling doe in one cart" ... An air carrier is a serious matter. And, as they say, “don’t say“ gop ”... Practice will show how much this“ biggest ”, but not bigger than ours, a Chinese fire engine will make successful water withdrawals.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 14 May 2018 10: 12
      0
      Quote: PValery53
      Practice will show how much this "largest", but not more than ours, a Chinese fire engine will make successful water withdrawals.

      take the number as always ....
  7. Cradle
    Cradle 14 May 2018 10: 26
    +1
    And we will wait, when the whole taiga will burn out, then we will buy Chinese, let’s stand a monument to our mismanagement ...
  8. pavelwf1
    pavelwf1 14 May 2018 10: 53
    0
    Well, the fact that China has assembled its aircraft for work in extreme conditions. That's good! But it's too early to call it amphibian.
    Since the rise of the vaults and from the surface of the airfield. There are completely different concepts. And physical loads exerted on an aircraft. Also, different. Take off from the airfield is one thing. And erasing the surface of the water as sandpaper. It's another! So as it takes off from the water, it will be Amphmbia!
    Well, not a plane take off! ;)
  9. san4es
    san4es 14 May 2018 10: 54
    0
    It is designed to extinguish fires and conduct rescue operations on the water. It is capable of collecting 12 tons of water on board in 20 seconds. The maximum take-off weight is 53,5 tons, the hull length is 39,3 m, the wingspan is 38,8 m, and the maximum flight range is 4,5 thousand km.

  10. Igor Vagin
    Igor Vagin 14 May 2018 18: 30
    0
    how many tears in comments))))))))))))