Military Review

In the Russian Defense Ministry told about the actions of the Americans who accompanied the Tu-95

38
The pilots of the American F-22A behaved correctly while accompanying the Russian strategic bombers Tu-95MS over neutral waters, reports Make a star.


In the Russian Defense Ministry told about the actions of the Americans who accompanied the Tu-95


Earlier, the Russian Defense Ministry said that the missile carriers Tu-95MS and anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142 successfully completed the planned flight over neutral waters and worked refueling in the air. One of the groups in a separate area was accompanied by American fighter F-22A.

The F-22A pilots held correctly, did not demonstrate any aggressive intentions, only indicated their presence at a respectful, approximately 100 meters, distance,
told the newspaper the commander of the group Tu-95 Lt. Col. Alexander Manyagin.

According to him, the Americans clearly took into account that the Russian pilots performed the flight in strict accordance with the International Rules, without violating the borders of other states.

“If in previous times in such cases our planes were accompanied by four or five successive groups of fighters of the Air Forces of Japan, the USA, and South Korea, this time only the Americans identified themselves and only one pair of fighters,” the article says.

The flight passes 11 May over the neutral waters of the Arctic Ocean, Bering and Okhotsk seas. During the flight, bombers and anti-submarine aircraft were accompanied by MiG-31 and Su-35 Fighter Jets. During the 17-hour flight, the crews worked on air refueling. All the tasks of the air patrol plan were completed in full.
Photos used:
RIA Novosti / Anton Denisov
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 14 May 2018 08: 03
    +4
    Pilots of American F-22A behaved correctly while escorting Russian strategic bombers Tu-95MS over neutral waters, reports Red Star.
    where is the "selfie"? It’s customary to do this, and pose at the request of ...? - low! stop
    1. Separ DNR
      Separ DNR 14 May 2018 08: 37
      +1
      “If in previous times in such cases, our planes were accompanied by four to five successive groups of fighters of the air forces of Japan, the USA, South Korea, this time only Americans and only one pair of fighters designated themselves”


      У usdzhapov planes crashed usKoreans, kerosene is over crying
  2. Maximys
    Maximys 14 May 2018 08: 04
    0
    Well, you see, we were able to provide our aircraft with professional and safe escort. No one was scared !!! laughing
  3. Masya masya
    Masya masya 14 May 2018 08: 12
    +2
    “If in previous times in such cases, our planes were accompanied by four to five successive groups of fighters of the air forces of Japan, the USA, South Korea, this time only Americans and only one pair of fighters designated themselves”

    relaxed something completely ...
    1. BecmepH
      BecmepH 14 May 2018 08: 37
      +5
      Quote: Masya Masya
      relaxed something completely ...

      Nah! They just know that ours and on bombers can cut them, support them in the stern, or even drive them across the fifth ocean)) Therefore, we kept a hundred meters ... correctly
      1. jjj
        jjj 14 May 2018 10: 48
        +1
        Ours could include something. Then the Americans would simply fall on their own. Catapult in an unexplored area
      2. mole
        mole 14 May 2018 17: 53
        0
        Quote: BecmepH
        Nah! They just know that ours and on bombers can cut them, support them in the stern, or even drive them across the fifth ocean)) Therefore, we kept a hundred meters ... correctly

        Now write ... Then the State Department will begin to refer to you and tell the whole world that our bombers themselves incorrectly conducted because of the numerical advantage! wink laughing
  4. kirgiz58
    kirgiz58 14 May 2018 08: 43
    0
    Bliiin! And didn’t they even play catch-ups with our escort fighters even after catching up? Probably ours was strictly forbidden to tease the "doggie." laughing
  5. igorka357
    igorka357 14 May 2018 08: 58
    +1
    The statement of our Defense Ministry, the exact opposite of the statements of their generals about the interception by our fighters of their reconnaissance aircraft .. Ours are always intercepted not safely, not professionally .. but they are correctly and professionally .. and also respectful .. lol
    1. Separ DNR
      Separ DNR 14 May 2018 09: 14
      +1
      Quote: igorka357
      Ours are always intercepted not safely, not professionally .. but they are correctly and professionally .. and also respectful ..

      So they are civilized, and Russian lol ...
  6. Whisper
    Whisper 14 May 2018 09: 14
    +1
    But the Tu-95MS themselves fly, our fighters do not accompany them? Kind of weird.
    1. anjey
      anjey 14 May 2018 09: 18
      0
      In neutral waters, the Tu-95 unaccompanied, rather easy prey for enemy interceptors, only a large flight ceiling in the discharged air can protect, fighters may have surging engines ...
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 14 May 2018 09: 58
        +1
        No ceiling of our “Bears” will save, you don’t know what you’re talking about, don’t write better! Planes on the “hill” knock down satellites in small orbit .. and you’re talking about the bomber!
        1. anjey
          anjey 14 May 2018 11: 43
          0
          Tu-95 universal economical turboprop engines that allow you to walk in the stratosphere, migrants 25 and 31 flew there earlier from our interceptors, of course, the technology is developing, I don’t know the ceiling of the f-22, and the range of their PNS systems ... but really the Bears - these are suicide bombers without a good long-range missile defense ...
          1. igorka357
            igorka357 14 May 2018 12: 20
            0
            So fighters do not need to fly there, the rocket will fly there ..
            1. anjey
              anjey 14 May 2018 12: 38
              0
              that’s what is needed for carcasses, the KR is twice as fast as x-101 in range, 10000 km, it is the safest launch from its territory and guaranteed defeat of targets in the United States .... that is, a potential enemy ....
              1. anjey
                anjey 14 May 2018 13: 43
                0
                Of course, to achieve such performance characteristics for the CD is difficult, but after Putin’s cartoons you won’t believe it yet ....
              2. igorka357
                igorka357 14 May 2018 19: 52
                +1
                Andrei, what kind of nonsense .. we have mine PUs ... then maybe why all these TU-95s .. laughing ?
                1. anjey
                  anjey 15 May 2018 05: 09
                  +1
                  rave? You contradict yourself, you say that in the neutral of the Tu-95 are defenseless, that I also confirm, but according to the purpose of the carcass, it’s a strategist and cr x-55 with apple so its range is only 2500 km, so what's the point?
                  1. anjey
                    anjey 15 May 2018 06: 39
                    0
                    Mines are mines, and if from a Tu-95 regiment, with a real alarm, even a couple of boards take off from the apple, after a nuclear strike there is a chance, if not New York and Washington but London and Manchester, it’s quite enough to wipe off the air defense barrier in Europe burn...
                    1. anjey
                      anjey 15 May 2018 08: 06
                      +1
                      that’s the strength of the nuclear strategic triad-nuclear submarines, Strategic Rocket Forces and Strategic Aviation with nuclear missile defense of the Kyrgyz Republic, which is hard to hit with one blow ...
      2. Black_PR
        Black_PR 14 May 2018 10: 49
        0
        Monsieur, do you even know what "engine surging" is and when does it occur?
        1. novel66
          novel66 14 May 2018 10: 58
          +1
          I know! when they shoot a large-caliber gun before cutting an air intake!
        2. anjey
          anjey 14 May 2018 11: 18
          0
          surge - lack of air for burning jet fuel in a turbine combustion chamber, access to poor traction mode ....
          1. anjey
            anjey 14 May 2018 11: 53
            0
            the engine, as in a car on the ground, is choked with an over-enriched mixture ..., a large amount of air must be supplied to the turbine through the air intakes to the turbine for normal operation ...
            1. igorka357
              igorka357 14 May 2018 12: 19
              0
              Andrei, you’re right about 50 percent .. but this is military equipment, everything is provided for it to a large extent, Sergey explained to you from the bottom .. so that we would not like any bomber, be it our TU-90, or TU-160. . upon detection by fighters our "partners" will be destroyed, just like their "Lancers" and "Spirit" upon detection by our fighters ..!
          2. Black_PR
            Black_PR 14 May 2018 11: 56
            0
            Do you know the notions of “adjustable air intakes” and “shock waves at the edge”?
            (about surging as a result of using guns is a slightly different topic ..)
            1. anjey
              anjey 14 May 2018 12: 14
              0
              I will not argue, the automation and computerization of modern aircraft engines compared to the 80 g of the last century, has stepped far forward, although aircraft also fall in the same way and engines fail ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 14 May 2018 10: 53
      +2
      Quote: Sheptun
      Tu-95MS fly themselves, our fighters do not accompany them? Kind of weird.

      Really strange. request laughing
      The flight takes place on May 11 over the neutral waters of the Arctic Ocean, the Bering and Okhotsk Seas. During the flight, bombers and anti-submarine aircraft accompanied the MiG-31 and Su-35 VKS fighters.
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 14 May 2018 12: 22
        +1
        I didn’t notice the phrase “during the whole flight” ... hi
      2. Whisper
        Whisper 14 May 2018 13: 15
        0
        and then what kind of interception? Is it not for this escort to disperse the jackals?
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 14 May 2018 19: 50
          +1
          This is not interception, but escort ... and our falcons are doing the same! And you thought in neutral airspace you can do what you want? There are also clear rules, you can patrol, you can make duty flights, but those who control you there is an opportunity .. and whose countries are nearby .. All as agreed ..
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 14 May 2018 09: 46
    +2
    During the flight, bombers and anti-submarine aircraft accompanied the MiG-31 and Su-35 VKS fighters
    Therefore, the Americans did not dare to pose as "heroes of the nation."
    1. Merold
      Merold 14 May 2018 09: 58
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      During the flight, bombers and anti-submarine aircraft accompanied the MiG-31 and Su-35 VKS fighters
      Therefore, the Americans did not dare to pose as "heroes of the nation."

      And when not accompanied, then portrayed? wink
    2. igorka357
      igorka357 14 May 2018 10: 00
      0
      We were escorted at the initial stage, on patrols of TU-95 they fly without cover! It is very rare that during some special tasks they can be covered by a couple .. but this is very rare ..
  8. Opozdavshiy
    Opozdavshiy 14 May 2018 10: 41
    0
    Sorry, I didn’t understand.
    What is a "respectful 100 meters distance"? This is the distance in the two hulls of the TU-95M aircraft, that is, almost a ram.
    Maybe after all 100 km?
    1. igorka357
      igorka357 14 May 2018 12: 13
      0
      No-no .. escort is almost always eye contact ..
  9. nesvobodnye
    nesvobodnye 14 May 2018 12: 19
    0
    They behaved correctly due to the presence of our fighters, not otherwise.