Military Review

Again missed? US coalition struck two Syrian villages

152
The planes of the international coalition led by the United States attacked two villages in the south of the Syrian province of Al-Hasakah, killing at least 17 civilians, according to RIA News with reference to Syrian state television.


Again missed? US coalition struck two Syrian villages


The first blow fell on the village of Al-Hamadi in the Abu Hamid area. Eight people died there. The coalition made a second raid on the village of Hidazh, located southeast of the city of Hasakah. There rocket hit houses. Four children and five women died at the scene.

In early May, SANA reported a coalition attack on the Al-Fadel settlement in the same Hasakah province. Then her less than 25 people died.

As the Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly noted, coalition actions are carried out without consent and coordination with official Damascus and without a resolution of the UN Security Council. The coalition itself admits that due to its air strikes in Syria and Iraq, at least 2014 civilians have been killed since 883 year.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
152 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 12 May 2018 17: 54
    +33
    Aircraft of an international coalition led by the United States attacked two villages in the southern Syrian province of Al-Hasaka, killing at least 17 civilians

    The US Air Force fights well only with civilians. And after no investigations, trials, indignation of the European public, UN sanctions, etc. ... quiet and smooth. Ugh, geeks.
    1. Russia
      Russia 12 May 2018 17: 58
      +22
      They receive orders for civilians, and after meeting with a less serious opponent, they lose their heads.
    2. Looking Petrovich
      Looking Petrovich 12 May 2018 18: 03
      +18
      Quote: NEXUS
      Aircraft of an international coalition led by the United States attacked two villages in the southern Syrian province of Al-Hasaka, killing at least 17 civilians

      The US Air Force fights well only with civilians. And after no investigations, trials, indignation of the European public, UN sanctions, etc. ... quiet and smooth. Ugh, geeks.

      Interestingly, the Russian media work. US Aviation can only:
      1. Oversight on the minder and the tractors;
      2. Almost all bring down the valiant air defense of Syria;
      3. The remaining part does not reach, falls and falls into the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.
      There can be no other options in principle.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 10
        +31
        Quote: Looking Petrovich
        There can be no other options in principle.

        And you provide "other options" who's stopping? That is, what our media say is propaganda and a lie, and the fact that the Western media are being poured into the sewers for the public is the truth? Remind you of a test tube at the UN and after 10 years of silence, "sincere remorse" Powell? And in Iraq, dear, 1,5 million people died from such a “truth.” And who suffered this punishment? M, you are our true lover?
        1. Merold
          Merold 12 May 2018 18: 24
          +7
          Quote: NEXUS
          Remind you of a test tube at the UN and after 10 years of silence, "sincere remorse" Powell?

          Better not. Because you don’t speak languages ​​and cannot search for information in the original source, then you will operate with links exclusively to the Russian media, which to put it mildly ... "do not always accurately convey information." After the true meaning and text of the statements and publications will be brought to you, you will make a good face in a bad game, gradually move off the topic, jump from fifth to tenth and eventually leave the battlefield saying something like " du.rak himself. "
          T.ch. Better not.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 25
            +16
            Quote: Merold
            Better not. Because you do not speak languages ​​and you cannot search for information in the original source

            Oh how ... so, dear enlighten the dark. I beg you. A linguistic analyst.
            1. Merold
              Merold 12 May 2018 18: 32
              +4
              Quote: NEXUS
              Quote: Merold
              Better not. Because you do not speak languages ​​and you cannot search for information in the original source

              Oh how ... so, dear enlighten the dark. I beg you. A linguistic analyst.

              What how"? Start reminding about the test tube and Powell’s statements (with two “Ls”, by the way, it’s written), citing these statements, and I will correct you.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 35
                +13
                Quote: Merold
                What how"? Start reminding about the test tube and Powell’s statements (with two “Ls”, by the way, it’s written), citing these statements, and I will correct you.

                You stated ..
                Quote: Merold
                After you will be given the true meaning and tex of statements and publications,

                Are these your words?
                So go ahead, explain to the foolish where I am wrong and what is not accurate. Give the American version and your personal translation.
                1. Merold
                  Merold 12 May 2018 18: 41
                  +4
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  Quote: Merold
                  What how"? Start reminding about the test tube and Powell’s statements (with two “Ls”, by the way, it’s written), citing these statements, and I will correct you.

                  You stated ..
                  Quote: Merold
                  After you will be given the true meaning and tex of statements and publications,

                  Are these your words?
                  So go ahead, explain to the foolish where I am wrong and what is not accurate. Give the American version and your personal translation.

                  Start over. You wrote
                  Remind you of a test tube at the UN and after 10 years of silence, "sincere remorse" Powell?

                  Begin to "remind" about the test tube and about remorse, as well. I am sure that you will misinterpret both that and another, I will correct you. And I have already prepared a transcript of the meeting with Powell and a video with him.
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 44
                    +12
                    Quote: Merold
                    And I have already prepared a transcript of the meeting with Powell and a video with him.

                    So go ahead ... with your competent translation. And if I was wrong, I will publicly ask you and Powell for forgiveness.
                    1. Merold
                      Merold 12 May 2018 18: 48
                      +3
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Quote: Merold
                      And I have already prepared a transcript of the meeting with Powell and a video with him.

                      So go ahead ... with your competent translation. And if I was wrong, I will publicly ask you and Powell for forgiveness.

                      You still haven’t been wrong because didn’t bring anything (although they promised, remember?) So what did you mean when you wrote that
                      Remind you of a test tube at the UN and after 10 years of silence, "sincere remorse" Powell?

                      Bolder!
                      1. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 53
                        +10
                        Quote: Merold
                        because brought nothing

                        We read carefully and thoughtfully ..
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Remind you of a test tube at the UN and after 10 years of silence, "sincere remorse" Powell?

                        Was the test tube? Or was she not? As a result, the UN gave the green light to hostilities.
                        Was there remorse? Or didn’t repent?
                        Here are my statements. It’s your turn, sickly ... refute these statements with your translation. Well, it’s very interesting to read and I think not only me.
                  2. Olgovich
                    Olgovich 13 May 2018 15: 51
                    0
                    Quote: Merold
                    Begin to "remind" about the test tube and about remorse, as well. I am sure that you will misinterpret both that and another, I will correct you.

                    You just mergedbecause they promised:
                    Quote: Merold
                    After they will bring you true meaning and tex of statements and publications,
                    and I didn’t do it, saying "start you."

                    And it’s not a shame ...
                    1. Merold
                      Merold 13 May 2018 16: 02
                      0
                      Quote: Olgovich
                      Quote: Merold
                      Begin to "remind" about the test tube and about remorse, as well. I am sure that you will misinterpret both that and another, I will correct you.

                      You just mergedbecause they promised:
                      Quote: Merold
                      After they will bring you true meaning and tex of statements and publications,
                      and I didn’t do it, saying "start you."

                      And it’s not a shame ...

                      I posted video of speech.
                      The transcript and links are at my fingertips and I will post them right after the person who promised "Remind you of a test tube at the UN and after 10 years of silence," Powell’s sincere repentance? ".
                      Only for some reason he did not. Can you try?
                      By the way, here is a statement by the President of the Russian Federation about this test tube, where he says, to put it mildly, not quite the truth. Correct me?
                      1. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 13 May 2018 16: 08
                        0
                        Quote: Merold
                        The transcript and links are at my fingertips and I'll post them right after the person who promised "Remind me you test tube at the UN and after 10 years of silence, "sincere remorse" Powell? "


                        He reminds his promise-Fulfilled.
                        You promise
                        give true meaning and tex statements and publications,
                        -NOT done.

                        This is a "drain". What's not clear? request
                    2. Merold
                      Merold 13 May 2018 16: 12
                      +1
                      Quote: Olgovich

                      He reminds his promise-Fulfilled.
                      You promise
                      give true meaning and tex statements and publications,
                      -NOT done.

                      This is a "drain". What's not clear? request

                      Has he done? He 15 posts after repeated persuasion to lay out the text of Powell’s speech and his remorse — he froze and then (as I predicted from the very beginning) like a dove “beautifully left” the joke.
                      1. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 13 May 2018 16: 14
                        0
                        Quote: Merold
                        Has he done? He 15 posts after repeated persuasion to lay out the text of Powell’s speech and his remorse — he froze and then (as I predicted from the very beginning) like a dove “beautifully left” the joke.

                        He recalled that you didn’t bring the “true meaning” as promised.
                        Все.
                        What is not clear, I ask again?
                2. Vasyan1971
                  Vasyan1971 12 May 2018 19: 18
                  +2
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  So go ahead, explain to the foolish where I am wrong and what is not accurate. Give the American version and your personal translation.

                  This is most likely about this: https://golos.io/ru--politika/@nikolai-ll/mify-so
                  vremennoi-rossii-probirka-pauella
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 12 May 2018 19: 48
                    +11
                    Quote: Vasyan1971
                    This is most likely about this.

                    I read the original text of the meeting at the UN. So what? Hussein is accused of producing and hiding biological weapons. What's next? Satellite imagery and Powell speculation.
                    Huxain acknowledged the presence of biological weapons. And is this an occasion to slander the country under the foundation?
                    It doesn’t matter what the test tube was, but it’s important that the UN Security Council was misled, on the basis of which the USA got the LAW LAW to start a war, and simply the destruction of Iraqi civilians on an industrial scale.
                    Russia is developing nuclear weapons ... according to this logic, we must be cleaned to the point of sterility so that others are not in the habit.
                    The evidence that Powell provided is only speculation, manipulation of opinions and stories about agents (not at all the fact that this was the case at all) and horror stories about Hussein is not just a tyrant, he is EVIL.
                    A former U.S. Secretary of State asks why the CIA did not warn him about a defector from Iraq, who admitted that he had fabricated his testimony about the presence of weapons of mass destruction.

                    Now about the "apologized" ...
                    On October 25, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair acknowledged in an interview with CNN that the invasion of America and its allies in Iraq in 2003 was one of the reasons for the emergence of the Islamic State terrorist organization (its activities are banned in Russia) and apologized for the mistakes made.

                    According to Powell, the CIA and RUMO should answer why they did not sound the alarm against Janabi. He demanded that he not be clearly informed that Curveball was a completely unreliable source of information, before the false information was included in the National Intelligence Assessment submitted to Congress, in the President’s report to Congress two months before the war, and in his own speech at the United Nations.

                    In particular, then Powell spoke of two vans discovered in Iraq, inside which, according to intelligence, were biological weapons production laboratories, which was confirmed by "different sources" at that time. Now Powell declares that he is not sure of the reliability of this information, but cannot describe the situation more precisely, since he is not a member of the "intelligence community".

                    And now the main question is, US FOUND US BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, DEAR?
                    1. Vasyan1971
                      Vasyan1971 12 May 2018 20: 30
                      +2
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      And now the main question is, US FOUND US BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, DEAR?

                      Well, so, for me, no one really looked for it. The thing is done, ends in the water. Wordlessly and unproven. Rehearsed Skripals and Assad.
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Remind you test tube at the UN

                      But the fact that the notorious test tube was not a decisive argument in deciding on the bending of Iraq. Just a spectacular element of the show, nothing more. hi
                      1. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 12 May 2018 20: 35
                        +6
                        Quote: Vasyan1971
                        Well, so, for me, no one really looked for

                        Searched or pretended ... when they tricked the country, the magician said that, oops, the focus did not work.
                        And someone, the same Powells answered for this in the same UN at least?
                        Quote: Vasyan1971
                        Just a spectacular element of the show, nothing more.

                        A tool for visual manipulation of opinion. And believe me it is not enough. hi
                      2. Vasyan1971
                        Vasyan1971 12 May 2018 21: 21
                        +2
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        A tool for visual manipulation of opinion. And believe me it is not enough.

                        I do not believe, I know. After all, somehow worked the same ...
                    2. Merold
                      Merold 12 May 2018 20: 42
                      +2
                      Quote: NEXUS

                      And now the main question is, US FOUND US BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, DEAR?

                      NEXUS, as I told you in my first post, you are unable (from the word "completely") to argue with a more or less prepared opponent. All your facts and links exclusively to the Russian media (INOSMI and Lenta.ru). No references to the source, exact quotes, etc. not at all.
                      You are in the know. that according to the terms of the ceasefire after the end of Desert Storm, hostilities could be resumed if the cease-fire conditions were violated - including the inability to prove disarmament. What was confirmed by further resolutions of the UN Security Council for 1992, 1995, 1996, 1998 and 2002.
                      UNSC Resolution No. 687 http://www.un.org/en/sc/documents/resolutions/199
                      1/
                      UNSC Resolution No. 1441 http://www.un.org/en/sc/documents/resolutions/200
                      2.shtml
                      1. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 12 May 2018 20: 47
                        +9
                        Quote: Merold
                        NEXUS, as I told you in my first post, you are unable (from the word "completely") to argue with a more or less prepared opponent.

                        Are you the trained opponent? As my grandfather used to say, it's funny to me.
                        Question-The reason for the invasion of Iraq and the decision of the UN Security Council was based on far-fetched versions and assumptions. Dot.
                        Why am I sitting here clever and poking at resolutions?
                        The second question is, did the USA find biological weapons after the invasion of Iraq?
                        You, dear "trained opponent", have not answered any of the questions posed.
                        And the third question, so for yourself ... and by whom are you prepared, you can find out?
                      2. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 12 May 2018 21: 38
                        +9
                        Quote: Merold
                        The reason for the invasion of Iraq was Iraq's inability to prove disarmament. What was confirmed by UN Security Council resolutions.

                        Seriously? The reason for the invasion was the US DESIRE to remove the Hussein regime, and the UN friendly said approvers.
                        In general, with what fright did Hussein have to provide something?
                        Neither the UN nor the United States had evidence ... what Powell claimed was at least misleading, but in truth, a complete deliberate lie. It was on the basis of his speech that the UN decided on the invasion.
                        Quote: Merold
                        Indeed, why do we need the source when you can read Lenta.ru with ready-made conclusions?

                        Answers to my questions where? No need to engage in verbiage here, "trained opponent."

                        Quote: Merold
                        you will do a good face with a bad game, gradually move off the topic
                        good

                        Quote: Merold
                        Since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, approximately 500 old chemical munitions have been found in the country.

                        And now we take and remember what Powell was talking about, shaking a test tube ... He was not talking about chemical weapons, but about BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS.
                        The second time, "prepared opponent" I ask, FOUND?
                        Quote: Merold
                        Let rusty and with almost sour filling,

                        And this is the reason why they plagued the country and killed one and a half million people?
                        Everything is clear with you. Get better, opponent. laughing
                        Sorry, but after you didn’t answer my question, you’re not interested in me. Trying to take aside some ridiculous conclusions. Alas, he promised to swear without touching the clave. For sim, I think our conversation is over. And the people who read our dialogue themselves will draw conclusions who is hu.
                    3. Egg
                      Egg 12 May 2018 20: 59
                      +4
                      NEXUS, respected here you need to write in quotation marks, and it’s more appropriate: Troll, just Troll ... wink
                      1. Vasyan1971
                        Vasyan1971 12 May 2018 21: 44
                        +1
                        Quote: Telur
                        NEXUS, respected here you need to write in quotation marks, and it’s more appropriate: Troll, just Troll ... wink

                        In order to follow your advice, the recommended NEXUS is too well brought up. And all interested parties oozing sarcasm from his "respected" and so perfectly visible. Take the risk, by the way, on occasion to disagree with his opinion and also join his "respect." Well, or do not take chances, if the knees are weak ....
                    4. Olgovich
                      Olgovich 13 May 2018 15: 56
                      +1
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      the fact that the UN Security Council was misled, on the basis of which, the USA received the LAW LAW to start a war, and simply the destruction of civilians

                      You are right in everything and you certainly won the argument, your vis-a-vis shamefully smiled.
                      One remark: the Security Council did not give permission to attack Iraq after a test tube.
                  2. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 12 May 2018 22: 02
                    +1
                    Quote: Vasyan1971
                    Take the risk, by the way, on occasion to disagree with his opinion and also join his "respect." Well, or do not take chances, if the knees are weak ....

                    Isn’t it a shame to slander? repeat I can always admit that I am wrong if a person conclusively refutes my words. I expect the same from opponents.
                    Well, the people here are different. You know it yourself. hi
                    1. Vasyan1971
                      Vasyan1971 12 May 2018 22: 33
                      +3
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Well, the people here are different.

                      I know. I myself am like that. bully The trouble is that everyone has their own fairy tale, in which he firmly believes and for various reasons "from Saul to Paul" is hardly "crossed." Not the famous "West is West, East is East and they cannot come together", of course, but something like that. request
                      And your notorious "respected" is still a powerful thing. To the grinding of teeth. lol
            2. sabakina
              sabakina 12 May 2018 18: 47
              +12
              Andrew help? I have a spring from Belarus ... wink
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 50
                +10
                Quote: sabakina
                Andrew help? I have a spring from Belarus ... wink

                Don’t ... let it scribble. I am very interested in HIS translation of Powell's tales. Surely, there he is kind and fluffy, remove the way, what a charm.
                1. sabakina
                  sabakina 12 May 2018 18: 55
                  +5
                  Well, as you say ... I can support the song ....
                  1. Merold
                    Merold 12 May 2018 19: 10
                    +3
                    Quote: sabakina
                    Well, as you say ... I can support the song ....

                    Knowledge and links better than a friend support, otherwise he is something "stalled".
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 12 May 2018 19: 18
                      +19
                      Quote: Merold
                      Knowledge and links better than a friend support, otherwise he is something "stalled"

                      The congress is counted. We assume that no one has seen your “bubbles”.
                      1. Merold
                        Merold 12 May 2018 19: 24
                        +4
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Quote: Merold
                        Knowledge and links better than a friend support, otherwise he is something "stalled"

                        The congress is counted.

                        I can’t get from you 5 posts what Powell said with a shaking test tube and his subsequent remorse, and the Congress counted from me? recourse Well, OK.
                    2. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 12 May 2018 19: 51
                      +9
                      Quote: Merold
                      what Powell said shaking a test tube

                      Read above.
                      1. Merold
                        Merold 12 May 2018 20: 46
                        +2
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Quote: Merold
                        what Powell said shaking a test tube

                        Read above.

                        What to read, the gag from "Inosmi" and "Ribbon"? Where are the quotes and videos?
                      2. Merold
                        Merold 12 May 2018 21: 17
                        +2
                        Quote: NEXUS

                        Are you the trained opponent? As my grandfather used to say, it's funny to me.

                        No damn, you - representing as evidence a gag from "Inosmi".
                        Quote: NEXUS

                        Question-The reason for the invasion of Iraq and the decision of the UN Security Council was based on far-fetched versions and assumptions. Dot.

                        The reason for the invasion of Iraq was Iraq's inability to prove disarmament. What was confirmed by UN Security Council resolutions.
                        Iraq did not provide accurate, complete, final and comprehensive information as required
                        resolution 687 (1991), on all aspects of its programs for the development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range of over 150 km and on all stockpiles of such weapons, their components and production facilities and locations, as well as all other nuclear programs, including those According to him, they are carried out for purposes not related to materials that can be used for the production of nuclear weapons.

                        Quote: NEXUS

                        Why am I sitting here clever and poking at resolutions?

                        Indeed, why do we need the source when you can read Lenta.ru with ready-made conclusions?

                        Quote: NEXUS

                        The second question is, did the USA find biological weapons after the invasion of Iraq?

                        Since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, approximately 500 old chemical munitions have been found in the country. Let rusty and with almost sour filling, but still, de jure, not even the destruction of a single shell is an incident-belli under the terms of the truce signed in 1991. Any questions?
                        PS: Well, then, will Powell quote when he shook a test tube and the text of remorse after 10 years?
                        Although what am I talking about? laughing
                        PS 2: Here is Powell's statement when he shakes a test tube (from 10.40). Translate what he says polyglot?
                2. Merold
                  Merold 12 May 2018 22: 10
                  +3
                  Quote: NEXUS

                  In general, with what fright did Hussein have to provide something?

                  Under ceasefire after Desert Storm Karl, Iraq must was to prove his disarmament, otherwise hostilities could be continued. Can you imagine? repeat
                  Neither the UN nor the United States had evidence ... what Powell claimed was at least misleading, but in truth, a complete deliberate lie.

                  So you’ll finally say what Powell said that “was at least a misleading, but in truth, a full conscious lie” or will you continue to deny?
                  It was on the basis of his speech that the UN decided on the invasion.

                  Wow? So did the UN sanction the invasion? good
                  The second time, "prepared opponent" I ask, FOUND?

                  No, no biological was found. found XO - it’s also WMD.
                  And this is the reason why they plagued the country and killed one and a half million people?
                  Everything is clear with you. Get better, opponent. laughing
                  Sorry, but after you didn’t answer my question, you’re not interested in me. Trying to take aside some ridiculous conclusions. Alas, he promised to swear without touching the clave. For sim, I think our conversation is over. And the people who read our dialogue themselves will draw conclusions who is hu.

                  And now recall that I wrote in my very first post about how our “discussion” will take place.
                  Quote: Merold
                  Because you don’t speak languages ​​and cannot search for information in the original source, then you will operate with links exclusively to the Russian media, which to put it mildly ... "do not always accurately convey information." After the true meaning and text of the statements and publications will be brought to you, you will make a good face in a bad game, gradually move off the topic, jump from fifth to tenth and eventually leave the battlefield saying something like " du.rak himself. "
                  .

                  It was nice to talk with such a "serious" opponent. lol
          2. 7gor
            7gor 12 May 2018 18: 47
            +6
            Drawn, Merold
            1. 7gor
              7gor 12 May 2018 18: 49
              +2
              Good man, in the opposite sense of the word
            2. sabakina
              sabakina 12 May 2018 18: 57
              +7
              Nabis, what can you do? Even in 1941 there were alarmists and provocateurs. And right now, in the era of the Internet ....
            3. Pivot
              Pivot 12 May 2018 19: 26
              +8
              You can call this melorda bunch in a puddle.
            4. vovanpain
              vovanpain 12 May 2018 20: 27
              +9
              Quote: 7gor
              Drawn, Merold

              Something tells me earlier this comrade, spoke here under the nickname analgin, well, then a friend didn’t come for a long time. laughing hi
          3. zhekazs
            zhekazs 12 May 2018 20: 09
            +10
            Quote: Merold
            Because you do not speak languages ​​and cannot search for information in the original source, then you will operate with links exclusively to Russian media, which to put it mildly ... "do not always accurately convey information."

            Let me ask - where does such confidence in the infallible truthfulness of foreign media come from?
        2. lis-ik
          lis-ik 12 May 2018 18: 27
          +9
          Quote: NEXUS
          And you provide "other options" who's stopping?

          For example, I introduced. According to loud statements by Shoigu, we won a long time ago, maybe stop talking and finally decide who we are with and what we are doing there? what the hell are our guys dying for? For a hypothetical threat or for the interests of the oil and gas sector, I do not pour water on a liberal mill, but maybe you should think?
          1. Vadivak
            Vadivak 12 May 2018 18: 52
            +7
            Quote: lis-ik
            For a hypothetical threat or for the interests of the oil and gas sector, I do not pour water on a liberal mill, but maybe you should think?

            Look think

            1. Passing by
              Passing by 13 May 2018 07: 02
              0
              And what is everything in Syria stuck in? Our "God-chosen" friends do not let the pipe through their territory?
            2. ALLxANDr
              ALLxANDr 13 May 2018 12: 47
              +2
              What is there to think? Judging by the drawing on the map, Russia does not make sense to lead anything through the Mediterranean Sea, because Russia has already made a branch to Turkey and it would be more logical to assume that the Iran-Iraq-Syria branch will also go through Turkey. There, in fact, an almost finished hub. Drawing is far from reality.

              Moreover, it is easier for Russia and Iran to draw a branch along the Caspian Sea and not to depend on anyone, because deliveries will go directly to Russia without intermediaries (especially those with the US military delayed as a guest). Russia, on the other hand, can export this gas either through the northern stream or through Turkish.
          2. igorka357
            igorka357 12 May 2018 18: 54
            +2
            So normal thinking people have long instructed ... and you .. laughing ?
          3. The comment was deleted.
            1. ALLxANDr
              ALLxANDr 13 May 2018 12: 55
              +2
              Russia is fighting with Ukraine? belay
              New Russia is not part of Russia (although it may become one).
              New Russia is part of that former Ukraine (at least it was).
              Every year Ukraine is doing everything to make Little Russia an independent entity.
        3. spiriolla-45
          spiriolla-45 13 May 2018 13: 08
          0
          Why are you so wound up? Believe me, both of them are breaching, this is propaganda. Ours, behind the Syrians, are negotiating with the Jews to persuade the "partners", not to deprive the dough, our thieves are addicted, and for that, the Kremlin’s drivers will not notice attacks on the Syrian troops and the shelling of the Lao PDR. They can even turn them in if they converge in price. It's okay - this is a market who sells his neighbor more dearly, such is life.
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 12 May 2018 18: 12
        +8
        You have mixed up, she cannot .. she receives an order, and does it ... If something is not clear to you, and you decide to throw a shit, so do not be shy .. tell me the merits of American aviation!
      3. Blackbeard
        Blackbeard 12 May 2018 18: 24
        +1
        The United States may fall, but apparently it doesn’t really want to what
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 26
          +3
          Quote: blackbeard
          The United States may fall, but apparently it doesn’t really want to what

          They get into exactly what they want.
          1. Vadivak
            Vadivak 12 May 2018 18: 54
            +7
            Quote: NEXUS
            They get into exactly what they want.

            Yes .... How much napalm and agent oraja poured in Vietnam
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 55
              +5
              Quote: Vadivak
              Yes .... How much napalm and agent oraja poured in Vietnam

              Here I am about ... about cluster bombing, phosphorus bombs ... it's there too ...
      4. Yura
        Yura 12 May 2018 18: 28
        +10
        Quote: Looking Petrovich
        Interesting Russian media work

        That is ours? If you are not ours, then whose are you then and where from? Look here:
        The first blow fell on the village of Al-Hamadi in the Abu Hamid area. Eight people died there. The coalition made a second raid on the village of Hidazh, located southeast of the city of Hasakah. There rocket hit houses. Four children and five women died at the scene.
        So do not lie - it is checked at a time.
        Quote: Looking Petrovich
        Almost all bring down the valiant air defense of Syria

        what is happening in Syria when it comes to air defense since the end of the Vietnam War is generally unprecedented, no one had any effectiveness during the fighting. What doesn’t suit you, are you even a Russian person?
      5. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 12 May 2018 19: 39
        +5
        Quote: Looking Petrovich
        Interestingly, the Russian media work. US Aviation can only:
        1. Oversight on the minder and the tractors; 2. Almost all bring down the valiant air defense of Syria; 3. The remaining part does not reach, falls and falls into the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. There can be no other options in principle.

        Maybe why not?
        The coalition itself recognizes that because of its airstrikes in Syria and Iraq, at least 2014 civilians have died since 883.
        It is their sources that report, not the Russian media. This is despite the fact that they inflict airstrikes in violation of all international norms, essentially carrying out an act of armed aggression against a sovereign state with which they are not at war. Now we are dancing towards the missiles you mentioned. As you know, the reason for the American "axes" attacks on Syria was that Assad allegedly used chemical weapons against civilians, which killed 25 or 28 people! This is also their media. But nothing that 883 civilians died from their attacks? If you follow their logic, now there is a reason to level the United States with the earth ?! Well, the fact that their missiles are flying badly was shown by Saudi Arabia online, when the released Patriot returned home, having destroyed a barn and crippled several Saudi subjects. This is also not the Russian media. Part of what flew over Syria fell into the hands of the Russian Ministry of Defense was shown on the stands, so to speak, "in kind" with markings and numbers, in connection with which the question - "Where is the evidence?" - not relevant.
    3. Tersky
      Tersky 12 May 2018 18: 09
      +12
      Quote: NEXUS

      The US Air Force fights well only with civilians.

      If only to estimate, then after World War II, the United States and its allies killed at least ten million in the vast majority of civilians. This is comparable to the amount destroyed by German Nazis in concentration camps. And this is a very minimal number ... I didn’t mention the civilian population of Japan’s atomic bomb just because it refers to the times after World War II. Andrew, hi !
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 12
        +7
        Quote: Tersky
        Andrew, !

        Vitya hi
        Quote: Tersky
        If only to estimate, then after the Second World War, at least ten million in the vast majority of civilians were killed by the Americans and their allies.

        Few counted, dear. In Iraq alone, 1,5 million people were killed according to the most conservative estimates. And from the age of 45, the United States has conducted more than 70 wars and military operations. There it is not about 10 million lives at all.
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 12 May 2018 19: 54
          +5
          Quote: NEXUS
          Few counted, dear

          Well, I'm with a reservation
          Quote: Tersky
          If at least approximately
          and again
          Quote: Tersky
          in the vast majority of civilians
          and if you also take into account the military, it’s natural that the figure will be much higher yes
    4. taiga2018
      taiga2018 12 May 2018 19: 02
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      US Air Force only fights well with civilians

      all the same, they are also destroying terrorists, they just adopted the proverb "wood is cut, wood chips fly," and for them wood chips are all those who are not included in the category of "exceptional ..."
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 12 May 2018 19: 09
        +3
        Quote: taiga2018
        all the same, they are also destroying terrorists, they just adopted the proverb "wood is cut, wood chips fly," and for them wood chips are all those who are not included in the category of "exceptional ..."

        Remember the movie Braveheart? When Wallace and the Irish allied on the battlefield, and logging began. And the king of England ordered the archers to shoot at this mess of people ... and the main one above the archers said, but there are our soldiers! To which the king replied, but there is Wallace.
        In my opinion it is very accurate characterizes the Anglo-Saxons.
  2. Whisper
    Whisper 12 May 2018 17: 55
    +2
    They are so gouging the whole gouging and barely living country!
    1. Ivan Tarava
      Ivan Tarava 12 May 2018 18: 02
      0
      And then we restore everything.
  3. Altona
    Altona 12 May 2018 17: 56
    +5
    This is normal for the coalition air force, this is actually the purpose of their war. None of this is collateral damage (collateral damage) as they say.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 12 May 2018 18: 14
      +5
      Quote: Altona
      This is normal for the coalition air force, this is actually the purpose of their war.

      hi
      You're right. The US coalition is not at war with ISIS, but with governments and peoples who dare to say no to their dictate. ISIS is their sons of bitches, whom they (USA & Ko) have recreated and use as a tool against the rebellious. Now these sons of bitches are suffering defeat after defeat, but their curators are already thinking over the next volume of this earthly tragedy and their plans are aimed at our underbelly. It is there that the bearded will be relocated.
  4. BZTM
    BZTM 12 May 2018 17: 56
    +3
    It’s good that we’re not fighting with them there, otherwise you won’t be able to wash the blood off your hands with such allies forever ...
    killing at least 883 civilians.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 06
      +7
      Quote: BZTM
      blood from hands with such allies ..

      It’s disgusting to touch such allies with their hands, only with a wand. Not like fighting with them together. And then Hollywood will make an epic film, 100 per million, about how the heroes of the Syrian company, and in particular the US Air Force pilots heroically, sparing their lives, destroyed the Igilov plague. And after all, they will watch this nonsense and pay money in theaters.
      1. BZTM
        BZTM 12 May 2018 18: 21
        +4
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: BZTM
        blood from hands with such allies ..

        And then Hollywood will make an epic movie

        I will not live to see me-Dimon (sorry- # onvamednedimon laughing ) I’ll raise my retirement age, I won’t see the film’s premiere, in the next world, I’ll tell you briefly about what there ... drinks hi
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 23
          +2
          Quote: BZTM
          I will not live

          You will live. There was no order to glue the fins. Count the retirement age to 200 years ... so we'll see, God forbid, how this mess ends. And if I’m removed, I won’t go and I won’t lead my son. I'm sorry.
          1. BZTM
            BZTM 12 May 2018 18: 33
            +3
            God save Andrey !!! Health to you and your family !!! They brought me from work only now, tired and angry, like a stinky dog ​​...... laughing
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 45
              +2
              Quote: BZTM
              Health to you and your family !!!

              Thank you. hi
              Quote: BZTM
              They brought me from work only now, tired and angry, like a stinky dog ​​...

              Well, we, too, weren’t shooting sparrows with gnats. wink
      2. figwam
        figwam 12 May 2018 18: 42
        +1
        Quote: NEXUS
        And after all, they will watch this nonsense and pay money in theaters.

        They will write in school textbooks and photographs will show how the exceptional nation won all. The crooks ...
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 48
          +1
          Quote: figvam
          The crooks ...

          A crook is when matches and gum are rubbing in a supermarket ... and here are the primary killers.
  5. Strips
    Strips 12 May 2018 17: 57
    +7
    Syrian TV and especially SANA - the mouthpiece of Syrian propaganda.

    We must wait for others to report, all the more so the Western coalition will recognize the loss of civilians, unlike others.
    1. DenZ
      DenZ 12 May 2018 18: 02
      0
      From others is it from whom? If they admit, then a tenth of those who were killed.
      1. Strips
        Strips 12 May 2018 18: 05
        +5
        Quote: DenZ
        From others is it from whom?


        Russia and Syria.
        Or did they somewhere recognize the loss of civilians?
        Or do you live in a fantasy world and believe that Russian and Syrian missiles fall exclusively into terrorists?

        In such conflicts, civilians always die.
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 12 May 2018 18: 16
          +1
          It’s true, but only when Russian and Syrian missiles kill civilians, they take with them all the Daishaites and all the moderates, and in the majority! But the Americans then spank on whom ...? Fifty Syrian soldiers, and one half-dead Daisha man who Syrians captured ???
          1. Strips
            Strips 12 May 2018 18: 30
            +3
            Quote: igorka357
            ! But the Americans are slapping for whom ...? Fifty Syrian soldiers, and one half-dead Daishaite who was captured by the Syrians ???


            Do you think for a thousand US strikes in Syria not a single terrorist died?
        2. Totah155
          Totah155 12 May 2018 18: 18
          0
          Quote: Tiras
          Quote: DenZ
          From others is it from whom?


          Russia and Syria.
          Or did they somewhere recognize the loss of civilians?
          Or do you live in a fantasy world and believe that Russian and Syrian missiles fall exclusively into terrorists?

          In such conflicts, civilians always die.

          Not everyone uses precision weapons. For expensive.
          And who can’t afford to use it, they’ll beat NUR and non-adjustable bombs.
          Think for yourself who ...
        3. Yura
          Yura 12 May 2018 18: 32
          0
          Quote: Tiras
          Or do you live in a fantasy world and believe that Russian and Syrian missiles fall exclusively into terrorists?

          Are you out of your mind? Well, here are the facts on the table.
          1. farcop
            farcop 12 May 2018 19: 17
            +2
            Quote: Jura
            Well, here are the facts on the table.
            Why do you need facts? All the same, you won’t believe the facts, say "they were dusted there with a heap", or "they scented dichlorvos themselves, well, etc. etc.
        4. vovanpain
          vovanpain 12 May 2018 20: 56
          +7
          Quote: Tiras
          Or do you live in a fantasy world and believe that Russian and Syrian missiles fall exclusively into terrorists? In such conflicts, civilians always die.

          We live cute, we live in this world and then stop telling tales about clever Israeli bombs that do not kill civilians, but only terrorists. laughing Believe Believe.
          And again, the unfortunate Kunduz, you can recall Yemen and Mosul and Rakku, well, well.
          1. Korax71
            Korax71 12 May 2018 21: 41
            0
            With one caveat. These were the Air Force of Afghanistan. And not mattresses. And the government recognized the deaths of civilians. But as the comrade told the Taliban above, they also crushed them.
          2. Merold
            Merold 13 May 2018 07: 39
            0
            Quote: vovanpain
            Quote: Tiras
            Or do you live in a fantasy world and believe that Russian and Syrian missiles fall exclusively into terrorists? In such conflicts, civilians always die.

            We live cute, we live in this world and then stop telling tales about clever Israeli bombs that do not kill civilians, but only terrorists. laughing Believe Believe.
            And again, the unfortunate Kunduz, you can recall Yemen and Mosul and Rakku, well, well.

            Not tired of posting fakes?
    2. Egorovich
      Egorovich 12 May 2018 18: 13
      +3
      The Syrians are fighting terrorism on their territory, and the mattress and the "chosen ones" are terrorizing the ATS. Both are two boots, a pair. Only both boots are dirty at the very top.
      1. Strips
        Strips 12 May 2018 18: 26
        +3
        Quote: Egorovich
        and the mattress and the "chosen" terrorize the ATS.


        Not a few terrorists also put mattresses, and the chosen ones do not go to war at all and they are worried about Iranian Shiite terrorists, and if Assad helps them, then he also receives it. This is quite suitable for Russia.
        1. Egorovich
          Egorovich 12 May 2018 18: 38
          +3
          Only one peculiarity, Iranian Shiites help Assad to be freed from bandits, and the "chosen ones" help these barmel men. And who are the terrorists interesting to know !? Probably the Iranians and the Syrians are destroying themselves !?
        2. 7gor
          7gor 12 May 2018 18: 58
          0
          Tiras! You are on the wrong branch
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 21
      +1
      Quote: Tiras
      moreover, the Western coalition recognizes the loss of civilians, unlike others.

      Of course he admits that they are not being punished or condemned for this. Ask about Mosul for a change, and then scribble about Syrian propaganda.
      1. Strips
        Strips 12 May 2018 18: 24
        +1
        Quote: NEXUS
        Ask about Mosul for a change, and then scribble about Syrian propaganda.



        What is the connection?

        The US Armed Forces Command acknowledged that at least 105 civilians died as a result of airstrikes on positions of the extremist Islamic State group banned in Russia and other countries near Iraqi Mosul.

        According to the military, their target was two snipers from the IG with high-precision weapons.

        However, as a result of the airstrike, the ammunition stored in one of the buildings detonated.

        Civilians in this building were killed.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 12 May 2018 18: 28
          +6
          Quote: Tiras
          near Iraqi Mosul killed at least 105 civilians.

          Nearby? 105 people? wassat Are you seriously? Mosul mattresses were closed to everyone, including the media, while they were cleaning it for half a year. There was no stone on it. What planet are you from, dear?

          And who was thinking about a peace house, do not tell?
  6. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 12 May 2018 17: 59
    +4
    More likely this volcano already ...
    He will wash away your anger and envy from your souls
    Will wash away the dirt of your black souls
    Make you cry, make you fall
    Brand the gods for their love
  7. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 12 May 2018 18: 02
    +8
    I’m becoming more and more convinced that the United States is doing this intentionally in order to provoke Syria to some kind of military action, such as the bombing of a US base in the same Syria, and then the tramp will begin carpet bombing of the entire territory of Syria. These are not blunders, these are attempts to begin expansion.
    1. Dezinto
      Dezinto 12 May 2018 18: 06
      +3
      that the United States is doing this deliberately in order to provoke Syria to some kind of military action, such as the bombing of a us base in Syria

      I think so too.
      And if Assad will be carried away and beat someone from the United States. They, as usual, without any UN sanctions, will fly a whole cloud of aircraft, and will finish off everything that remains from Syria. recourse And this mother is her western grave policy .... "!!!!!!
      1. figwam
        figwam 12 May 2018 18: 50
        0
        ANCIENT
        Dezinto

        The easiest way is to show how the Syrian army hit a chem. weapons on the mattress base and then there will be no restrictions on the bombing.
  8. Aandrewsir
    Aandrewsir 12 May 2018 18: 03
    +2
    The Syrians are not sorry for them. As well as Russians, Ukrainians, Iraqis, Koreans, Iranians and other people of "non-Western civilization." If they don’t get a good toothache, they will continue to bomb the aspids.
    1. asv363
      asv363 13 May 2018 04: 29
      +2
      Exactly until the coffins in proportionate quantity go back to the USA.
  9. Altona
    Altona 12 May 2018 18: 05
    +1
    Quote: BZTM
    It’s good that we’re not fighting with them there, otherwise you won’t be able to wash the blood off your hands with such allies forever ...

    ---------------------------------
    We will never fight with the coalition shoulder to shoulder, because our goals are different and they are far from the declared "fight against ISIS *". The purpose of this war is to seize control of Middle Eastern gas and oil flows. Gas and oil are traded for dollars, not rubles.
    1. cniza
      cniza 12 May 2018 18: 10
      +2
      We have not only different goals, but also methods and methods that are strikingly different.
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 12 May 2018 19: 08
        +1
        They do not even have the word "decency" in the lexicon.
        Salute, Victor!
        1. cniza
          cniza 12 May 2018 20: 59
          +1
          And about conscience ... Hello Vladimir! hi
        2. NEXUS
          NEXUS 13 May 2018 00: 11
          +1
          Quote: pvv113
          They do not even have the word "decency" in the lexicon.

          They have also buried the concept of LAWFUL.
  10. Ivan Tarava
    Ivan Tarava 12 May 2018 18: 09
    0
    It turns out their vaunted smart missiles are not accurate? But what about JDAM precision bombs?
  11. Altona
    Altona 12 May 2018 18: 11
    0
    Quote: cniza
    We have not only different goals, but also methods and methods that are strikingly different.

    ----------------------------
    Situationally, the interests of Miller and Assad coincided. But overall, you're right.
  12. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 May 2018 18: 24
    +2
    "The law of power" in all its glory. "Exceptional nation"? Somewhere I already heard it.
  13. net0103net
    net0103net 12 May 2018 18: 30
    +1
    What a ridiculous title for the article ?! Peaceful people are dying there, and all you need is to quit the competence of the one who killed women and children ?! ...
    So they didn’t miss, they hit !! The violence has happened again !! After all, this is “cool” - isn’t it, fellow author ?! There was a demonstration of impunity for a crime against human life and the triumph of black hypocrisy, and all you can say is “missed” ?! They’ll miss it five more times and the effectiveness of the military presence of the Russian Federation in Syria will decline drastically! And then our soldiers will begin to be cut right in the afternoon as in Afghanistan. And then you have to turn the base and leave in disgrace. This is a respected author. You missed the title and content of the article. Could you correctly tell us about the figures that you gave in your pathos "report".
  14. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 12 May 2018 18: 35
    0
    And they did not deal with the disposal of their chemical weapons? I mean, the US didn’t use chemical weapons?
  15. Jack O'Neill
    Jack O'Neill 12 May 2018 18: 57
    0
    I wonder what was there in these villages ...
    Amerikans are not the first time so "miss". I don’t think that they’re getting high on the bombing of Syrian collective farmers, which means there’s something else ...
    Maybe something or someone hid in these villages? There is plenty of room for fantasy.
  16. Merold
    Merold 12 May 2018 19: 00
    0
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Merold
    because brought nothing

    We read carefully and thoughtfully ..
    Quote: NEXUS
    Remind you of a test tube at the UN and after 10 years of silence, "sincere remorse" Powell?

    Was the test tube? Or was she not? As a result, the UN gave the green light to hostilities.
    Was there remorse? Or didn’t repent?
    Here are my statements. It’s your turn, sickly ... refute these statements with your translation. Well, it’s very interesting to read and I think not only me.

    So will you quote Powell when he shook a test tube and the text of his remorse or not? I understand that you are afraid (and rightly so that you are afraid) to sit in a puddle, but why should I refute that?
  17. bald
    bald 12 May 2018 19: 00
    0
    Pancake !!!!! - Where the international community is watching. USA - bombing Syria, both from the sea - from the inside. Allegedly destroying a non-existent chem. weapons and at the same time hollow the Syrian people. They must be driven not only into the neck from the neighbor, but everywhere, so that in their states the earth burns under their feet. They deserve it.
    1. farcop
      farcop 12 May 2018 19: 20
      0
      Quote: bald
      at the same time hammering the Syrian people

      Assad started, he will lose. Assad is more important to you than the people of Syria, so be quiet there
      Quote: bald
      Kda is watching the international community
      1. bald
        bald 12 May 2018 19: 36
        0
        Why did the states climb there - the goal?
        1. Totah155
          Totah155 12 May 2018 20: 41
          0
          Quote: bald
          Why did the states climb there - the goal?

          Yes, the same as in Russia.
          Hydrocarbons - called
          1. bald
            bald 12 May 2018 21: 40
            0
            Be real, don’t tell, Russia has everything.
            1. Totah155
              Totah155 13 May 2018 10: 04
              0
              Quote: bald
              Be real, don’t tell, Russia has everything.

              So the problem is that others do not have alternative supplies.
              Qatar does not sleep ...
        2. farcop
          farcop 12 May 2018 21: 29
          0
          Quote: bald
          Why did the states climb there - the goal?
          Kurds called and voted. Reminds me of something?
          1. bald
            bald 12 May 2018 21: 48
            0
            For autonomy in Iraq? - So these are local affairs, well, no matter how the states are in control, I’ll say more, not Russia, although everyone has their own interests, what to hide. And you never answered my question. Why do you need this? greenery ?
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 12 May 2018 21: 20
        +1
        Quote: farcop
        Assad started, he will lose.

        Well, for now, he does not care about the United States and its missiles, as well as heart-rending screams.
        Quote: farcop
        Assad is more important to you than the people of Syria

        Firstly, we are there on LEGAL BASES, and why did you forget there with 16 bases? The borzometer is off scale or not in the know, about the saying about the butt and the bolt?
        Quote: farcop
        so be quiet there c

        Tell the generals and congressmen this at night, you are our exclusive.
        1. farcop
          farcop 12 May 2018 21: 32
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          Well, for now, he doesn't care
          The fact that Assad does not care is not news. He smashed the country to smithereens and he didn’t care. Chegozh you did not ask him by what right he poison people with chemistry? Why do you throw barrels of explosives at people, and all with the tacit support of Russia, you will not spit on his crimes.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 12 May 2018 21: 45
            +1
            Quote: farcop
            He smashed the country to smithereens and he didn’t care.

            Did he smash it? wassat Or are you and your ISIS sponsored? Do not eat raw tomatoes at night, dear.
            Quote: farcop
            Chegozh you did not ask him by what right he poison people with chemistry?

            Facts of bullying in the studio. Just run away first to the White Helmets, they just have an office in London.
            Quote: farcop
            Why do they throw barrels of explosives at people?

            I repeat, FACTS IN A STUDIO. Where, what barrels and on what people.
            1. farcop
              farcop 12 May 2018 22: 26
              +1
              Quote: NEXUS
              you and your ISIS sponsored
              Well, you don’t have to turn over the bags, and therefore what remains is what you are doing here. ISIS is based on Iraqi and Syrian soldiers trained in the USSR and formerly there and after under the hood of the KGB. So sho you spawned.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 12 May 2018 22: 36
                +1
                Quote: farcop
                Well, you don’t have to turn over the bags, and therefore what remains is what you are doing here. ISIS is based on Iraqi and Syrian soldiers trained in the USSR and formerly there and after under the hood of the KGB. So sho you spawned.

                And who started the Desert Storm even after the Third Invasion, the USSR? On invented false pretexts. The fact that the Iraqi military was trained in the USSR only says that they are a good military.
                Do you still open your mouth here, after being from the age of 45 to this day the most warring country with the largest military budget?
                Who dropped bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the USSR? On absolutely strategically meaningless cities crowded with civilians!
                What is going on in Guantanomo, American? Do not tell?
                In Afghanistan, drug trafficking has tripled since the entry of your troops! Also the USSR is to blame?
                Silent would sit, tossing and dropping bags.
                1. farcop
                  farcop 12 May 2018 22: 52
                  +1
                  And who decided to grind Otrepyev? Ahhh? And who drowned Princess? Mumu again right into the river. Who sold their people in the bazaar? Aren't you? All Siberian people were drunk, they would shut their mouths and be ashamed. First stop ISIS covering. And yes, you don’t have to turn over the bags, and therefore continue what remains.
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 12 May 2018 23: 01
                    0
                    Quote: farcop
                    And who decided to grind Otrepyev? Ahhh? And who drowned Princess? Mumu again right into the river. Who sold their people in the bazaar? Aren't you?

                    Wow, what grassy grass you have. I repeat, do not eat raw tomatoes at night. And there’s nothing for the hamster to pull on the globe to sit here.
                    Quote: farcop
                    Why do they throw barrels of explosives at people?

                    I am waiting for the facts to the studio. And after we talk about mu-mu.
                    1. farcop
                      farcop 13 May 2018 08: 09
                      +1
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      I'm waiting for the facts in the studio
                      https://www.thenational.ae/world/mena/assad-drops
                      -almost-70-000-barrel-bombs-on-syria-study-finds-
                      1.692570
                      We open the Internet, drive into the search for an assad barrel bombs and look, a lot and different.
                      Now start - ani fse frut.
                      1. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 13 May 2018 10: 14
                        0
                        Quote: farcop
                        We open the Internet, drive into the search for an assad barrel bombs and look, a lot and different.

                        Opened and what? Maybe you should already start to think with your head, and not to harass the stupidity that feeds you?
                        The second report of the Syrian Human Rights Network (SNHR). The title is no longer so modest and framed in the affirmative form - "As a result of Russian air strikes, 254 civilians were killed, including 83 children and 42 women." In this publication, human rights activists howl again - the videoconferencing system does not hit ISIS. It is noted that more than a year of air strikes by the American coalition were killed during the month of the work of the air forces and civilians. "Russian politicians argue that their goal is the fight against ISIS and terrorism in Syria. However, they kill civilians and fighters of groups that oppose the Assad government," the report says. The following are truly sensational data, according to estimates by the Syrian human rights network, 96% of all those killed in the Syrian war are victims of the Assad government.
                        And the United States is directly God's angels and 3 years, before the appearance of the Russian Aerospace Forces, didn’t they kill anyone right? Where is the organization’s report on Mosul, on Raqqah? Didn’t I find the angry articles of this organization about what the USA was doing in Mosul and Raqqa? And I realized ... apparently democratic bombs bombed exclusively ISIS. wassat
                        Quote: farcop
                        Now start - ani fse frut.

                        So you have already begun. wassat
                        Show me the report of the Syrian Human Rights Network (SNHR) on the actions of the United States and the coalition in Syria. Of particular interest is the period before the entry of the Russian Aerospace Forces into Syria.
                        And there we’ll laugh together.
                      2. farcop
                        farcop 13 May 2018 10: 48
                        0
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Opened and what?
                        You asked for facts about Assad barrels, you received them, immediately began to wag. How typical this is for you. Real fsofyfret.
                      3. NEXUS
                        NEXUS 13 May 2018 11: 00
                        +1
                        Quote: farcop
                        You asked for facts about Assad barrels, you got them

                        Is this evidence? Statements by an organization that claims that 96% of all those killed in Syria are Assad’s work? What are you smoking there? fool
                        Quote: farcop
                        How typical this is for you.

                        How typical for you not to think with your head, but to believe everything that is stuffed in you.
                        And I think that this Syrian human rights organization is as independent and reliable as the White Helmets organization.
                      4. farcop
                        farcop 13 May 2018 11: 05
                        +1
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Is this evidence?
                        Of course, do you have others? bring and laugh together.
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Is 96% of all those killed in Syria the work of Assad?
                        Didn't you know? Well, the whole world knows, and you have fsofyfret.
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        it’s typical for you not to think with your head
                        This you say because you are a Nobel laureate? You look more like Shnobelovsky to me.
                    2. Merold
                      Merold 13 May 2018 10: 51
                      +1
                      Quote: NEXUS

                      Show me the report of the Syrian Human Rights Network (SNHR) on the actions of the United States and the coalition in Syria. Of particular interest is the period before the entry of the Russian Aerospace Forces into Syria.
                      And there we’ll laugh together.

                      Well, that "expert", start showing? wink
  18. private person
    private person 12 May 2018 19: 22
    +2
    Americans do not care who they strike with iron logic, we are right, and whoever disagrees, let them shut up. But where is the press with the video of the victims, where are the statements to the UN? Here it proves once again who is the boss in the house.
  19. Langf
    Langf 12 May 2018 19: 28
    +2
    Often enough to be an accident.
  20. Alexey N
    Alexey N 12 May 2018 19: 43
    0
    However, what an influx of trolls.
    Kakly intensified? .
  21. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 12 May 2018 19: 48
    0
    in short, the conclusion of the bombing is simple.
    we agreed with Israel not to uncover C-300 from Syria yet, and this rapprochement with the Americans is not a topic (!)
  22. Altona
    Altona 12 May 2018 20: 00
    0
    Quote: farcop
    Assad started, he will lose. Assad is more important to you than the people of Syria, so be quiet there

    ------------------------------
    Strange statement of the question. Apparently the American Gauleiter is much more important for the Syrian people.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 13 May 2018 03: 34
    +3
    Again missed? US coalition struck two Syrian villages

    Explain why these messages are posted? If only to show what villains are fighting in Syria, then consider your task completed. We believe you. The United States is the gendarme, the United States is a villain who discord in international relations and violates international law and the sovereignty of states. What's next? What prevents the provision of layered air defense in Syria at the current stage of the war? You then explain the meaning of the presence of Russian troops in Syria. What should they do there? Fix missile launches in Syria? Count the number of terrorists released through corridors? Discover the connection between the US military and ISIS? Explain why the "Shell" at the time of destruction was without cover? Wiping snot and stating that scaring the “God-chosen” flyers with the S-300 complexes has gone and is unreasonable? What exactly does Russia need in Syria? request By analogy with 1941: provocations have ended, the border has not only been crossed, but fighting is already underway on the approaches to Moscow and the ring near Leningrad is shrinking, and at the headquarters of the Supreme Commander, there is still talk of mobilizing and using multiple launch rocket launchers, the debate will hurt Nazis or should not be so categorical with them, because they-just made a mistake ... belay
    This is called smearing the snot on the cheeks. I clearly explain. Conjugation. When suddenly Netanyahu begins to make adjustments to the operational plans of the Russian group.
    I will write to you without profanity:
    Tram, Macron and Netanyahu
    If you didn’t go together ... "to school" negative
  25. Zomanus
    Zomanus 13 May 2018 08: 00
    0
    If they are not hit on the head, then they can bomb anyone.
    And if they hit at least one American plane,
    then Syria will be erased from the face of the earth.
    And figs who will say something ...
  26. watchmaker
    watchmaker 13 May 2018 08: 29
    0
    Why did Assad call on Russia to help?
    The bandits were killed, so what? The war was going on in Syria, and it is going on, as civilians were being killed, they are being killed ... The only difference is that more and more they are killed where there is no more or no Ros. Police .. And now the Syrians were killed not by the Ishilov’s ambush, but by direct fire from the air - the USA .....
    With this situation, the war in Syria will never end.
  27. watchmaker
    watchmaker 13 May 2018 08: 49
    0
    Quote: Zomanus
    If they are not hit on the head, then they can bomb anyone.
    And if they hit at least one American plane,
    then Syria will be erased from the face of the earth.
    And figs who will say something ...

    Will they erase with the Russians?
    They may try, it seems to me, in connection with self-confidence, but only Putin and Shoigu surely know what comes out of it ....
  28. Merold
    Merold 13 May 2018 11: 06
    +1
    NEXUS,
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: farcop
    You asked for facts about Assad barrels, you got them

    Is this evidence? Statements by an organization that claims that 96% of all those killed in Syria are Assad’s work? What are you smoking there? fool
    Quote: farcop
    How typical this is for you.

    How typical for you not to think with your head, but to believe everything that is stuffed in you.
    And I think that this Syrian human rights organization is as independent and reliable as the White Helmets organization.

    I look at the "expert" no longer wants to laugh against the background of his loud statements about "thinking with his head"? lol
    1. farcop
      farcop 13 May 2018 12: 28
      +1
      Quote: Merold
      I look at the "expert" no longer wants to laugh against the background of his loud statements about "thinking with his head"?
      Talking head can't think hi
  29. Merold
    Merold 13 May 2018 11: 10
    0
    farcop,
    Quote: farcop
    Quote: NEXUS
    Is this evidence?
    Of course, do you have others? bring and laugh together.
    Quote: NEXUS
    Is 96% of all those killed in Syria the work of Assad?
    Didn't you know? Well, the whole world knows, and you have fsofyfret.
    Quote: NEXUS
    it’s typical for you not to think with your head
    This you say because you are a Nobel laureate? You look more like Shnobelovsky to me.

    You underestimate your opponent. Now he will nail you with "facts" from "Inosmi" and "Lenta.ru". bully
    1. farcop
      farcop 13 May 2018 12: 31
      +1
      Quote: Merold
      Now he will nail you with "facts" from "Inosmi" and "Lenta.ru".
      Well duck and laugh together, compare the press then. By the way, on Lente there is an excellent description of the confrontation between Assad and the Iranians against Russia. And one fine day, and they will describe how Assad destroyed his people.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 13 May 2018 13: 20
        0
        Quote: farcop
        And one fine day, and they will describe how Assad destroyed his people.

        So what does your Syrian human rights service write about US actions in Mosul and Raqqah there? I listen very carefully, you are not our talking head.
        1. farcop
          farcop 13 May 2018 14: 28
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          I repeat, FACTS IN A STUDIO. Where, what barrels and on what people.
          Did you write You. Did you get an answer? Got. And immediately wriggle like this on a scallop. And don’t talk about your head, you have it to eat and drink to eat. Run to ask what to answer.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 13 May 2018 14: 34
            0
            Quote: farcop
            Did you write

            This is dear, NEFACTS and your vyser and imagination. They provided a photo of an incredible piece of iron and designated it as Asad’s ... well done. Continue to believe the State Department and kiss Redhead in all places.
            Quote: farcop
            And immediately wriggle like this on a scallop.

            Who apologizes? I wrote for the dull and mattresses, this is not a source, but a fantasy, since this organization did not scribble any articles and statements before the appearance of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria. Or your brave warriors did not bomb anything there for 3 years in a row?
            Quote: farcop
            And don’t talk about your head, you have it to eat and drink

            You say a hamburger, freak. You need to write fairy tales, and not to sit on VO with such evidence to disgrace.
            Is it silent about Mosul and Raqqa? I thought so. Keep gagging the fan. wassat
            1. farcop
              farcop 13 May 2018 14: 39
              0
              Quote: NEXUS
              Keep gagging the fan.
              Continue to eat.
  30. drags33
    drags33 13 May 2018 12: 31
    0
    I’m embarrassed to ask - what do our super-air defense do there? In Soviet times, during the Israeli attacks on Syria, the Politburo placed our air defense calculations there, which immediately stopped all attacks. Now the situation is worse than under the Soviet Politburo? Or was the FIFA World Cup tied up? Of course, we don’t know much about this iceberg called “Politics” ... But the visible part of this “Politics” must also be kept in a decent form. Otherwise, we for the Arabs (and the world as a whole) are defeatists with whom we cannot deal.
    1. farcop
      farcop 13 May 2018 12: 42
      0
      Quote: drags33
      In Soviet times, during the Israeli attacks on Syria, the Politburo placed our air defense calculations there.
      In Soviet times, Soviet air defense in Syria, Israel smashed to smithereens. As one Arab said: Israeli fighters shot Syrian planes one by one, like flies and the support of the United Armed Forces from the ground was useless.
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Операция_«Медведка_
      19
  31. Merold
    Merold 13 May 2018 16: 20
    0
    Olgovich,
    Quote: Olgovich
    Quote: Merold
    Has he done? He 15 posts after repeated persuasion to lay out the text of Powell’s speech and his remorse — he froze and then (as I predicted from the very beginning) like a dove “beautifully left” the joke.

    He recalled that you didn’t bring the “true meaning” as promised.
    Все.
    What is not clear, I ask again?

    You start to bore me. Where recalled, show?
  32. Alex Justice
    Alex Justice 13 May 2018 17: 49
    +1
    Quote: NEXUS
    And from the age of 45, the United States has conducted more than 70 wars and military operations. There it is not about 10 million lives at all.

    Somewhere I read 27 million died, where America was involved.