In a cordial atmosphere. Kim Jong-un visited China

12
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un arrived in the Chinese city of Dalian, where he began negotiations with PRC chairman Xi Jinping, reports NTV with reference to the Chinese media.





PRC Chairman Xi Jinping held talks with the Chairman of the DPRK State Council, Kim Jong-un in the Chinese city of Dalian,
says the Xinhua news agency.

The fact of the talks between the two countries was also confirmed by China Central Television.

According to the information, the talks were held in a cordial and friendly atmosphere "and the leaders of the two countries" exchanged views on bilateral relations ", as well as on other" important issues of mutual interest. "

This, in particular, was about the planned meeting between Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump. According to the TV company, the head of the DPRK said that he hoped to “build trust” with the head of the White House, and spoke in favor of denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula.

After the talks, Xi Jinping and Kim Jong-eun took a walk and had lunch.

Today, US President Trump said he intends to hold a telephone conversation with "his friend" Xi Jinping to discuss issues related to trade and North Korea.
  • https://hippy-end.livejournal.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    8 May 2018 15: 18
    It seems that Eun did not put all the cards in the game with the USA. In a fun time we live. The USA wants to return everything to unipolarity, and the Russian Federation, North Korea, China, Iran do not really agree with this. But the NATO is then united, and rogue countries push separately.
    1. +3
      8 May 2018 15: 20
      These two Amertsians on both shoulder blades ... In one fell swoop.
      Quote: NEXUS
      It seems that Eun did not put all the cards in the game with the USA. In a fun time we live. The USA wants to return everything to unipolarity, and the Russian Federation, North Korea, China, Iran do not really agree with this. But the NATO is then united, and the rogue countries give separately.
      1. +5
        8 May 2018 15: 22
        Quote: NEXUS
        It seems that Eun did not put all the cards in the game with the USA.

        It seems that not Eun is playing, but playing him! Chinese...
      2. +2
        8 May 2018 15: 22
        Quote: 210ox
        These two Amertsians on both shoulder blades ... In one fell swoop.

        And where are these BRICS, CSTO, SCO? To confront such a colossus as NATO, coupled with the United States, we need an alliance, as we will be crushed one by one.
        1. +2
          8 May 2018 16: 45
          BRICS, CSTO, SCO is an information weapon.
  2. 0
    8 May 2018 15: 18
    Well, how's your grater with Trump? Yes, I broke it normally!
  3. +1
    8 May 2018 15: 19
    It seems like Eun is someone zombie, or Putin, or X, or Trump ... laughing that Eun was planning some trick !!! A friend could not retreat so quickly !!!!
  4. +5
    8 May 2018 15: 55
    the head of the DPRK announced that he hopes to "build trust" with the head of the White House, and advocated the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

    Under the USSR, we ensure the security of our allies, including the DPRK, from a nuclear strike. The United States entered into exactly the same treaties with its allies, for example, with Japan, which are valid to date.
    After the collapse of the USSR, the liberal elite of the Russian Federation refused to fulfill the agreement with the DPRK and Kim began to develop their own nuclear weapons. Our elite, together with the United States, declared a DPRK blockade that continues to this day.
    And now the current Kim surrendered; he is for denuclearization. But having lost faith in us, Kim agrees with China on guarantees of DPRK sovereignty.
    We have lost another ally. And jerking is not appropriate here.
    1. +1
      8 May 2018 19: 34
      Quote: Svateev
      the head of the DPRK announced that he hopes to "build trust" with the head of the White House, and advocated the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

      Under the USSR, we ensure the security of our allies, including the DPRK, from a nuclear strike. The United States entered into exactly the same treaties with its allies, for example, with Japan, which are valid to date.
      After the collapse of the USSR, the liberal elite of the Russian Federation refused to fulfill the agreement with the DPRK and Kim began to develop their own nuclear weapons. Our elite, together with the United States, declared a DPRK blockade that continues to this day.
      And now the current Kim surrendered; he is for denuclearization. But having lost faith in us, Kim agrees with China on guarantees of DPRK sovereignty.
      We have lost another ally. And jerking is not appropriate here.

      Since the beginning of the 90s, the DPRK has not been our ally, like Cuba, Vietnam ... further everywhere.
      But Kim did not give up, he clearly and convincingly fulfills his role in the strategic game of China.
      Approximate, but reliable proposals by the DPRK: the northerners transfer equipment and warheads to China, China guarantees the security of at least the skies over the DPRK, US air defenses are withdrawn from South Korea, US bases are significantly reduced, and provocative exercises are not carried out. It’s completely tough.
      And the southerners and the Americans do not want to, excuse me, because we offered a way out request
  5. +1
    8 May 2018 16: 19
    declinization- summits- off-offices- selfie- reservations- ghetto- maidan- benches only for Jews - coffins covered with ashes
  6. +6
    8 May 2018 16: 34
    The PRC does not seem to want Eun blundered, since, in fact, Xi acts as an intermediary and proofreader of plans.
  7. +1
    8 May 2018 16: 59
    Putin also needs to reconsider relations with the DPRK. The meeting of the leaders of our countries is such a bone in the throat of the American right to self-determination in the foreign policy of foreign countries.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"