"Cunning Chinese" abandoned the role of "junior partner" of the USA

27
Washington repeatedly offered Beijing to manage the whole world together, but the Chinese authorities did not want to become the “junior partner” of the powerful Uncle Sam, leading Look Statement by expert Michael Pillsbury.





You know, they refused us. Several people came up with such proposals — the so-called G2 plan — and the Chinese scientists who are allowed to write about it in articles and books said: “No, you know, we really don't want to be number two, America’s junior partner”
Pillsbury said on Fox News.

According to him, "China is waiting for the moment when it can be the first number," but the US needs to take "many measures to prevent this."

We must deny them technological superiority. This is the first. Secondly, we need to better understand how deeply they have penetrated our companies, our social life, our university environment,
continued the expert.

He noted that in the case of the USSR it was easier, since with the United States there was almost no connection and a common business.

And China is deep inside us. And we do not want to demonize them altogether - this would create problems for our own political system. But we need to better understand how clever they are,
concluded Pillsbury.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    7 May 2018 16: 05
    "And China is deep within us!" Yes, yes baby) China will still blow everyone!
    Good analytics from an expert!
    1. +10
      7 May 2018 16: 08
      Quote: bazzbazz
      "And China is deep within us!" Yes, yes baby) China will still blow everyone!
      Good analytics from an expert!

      The USA only got it. China will either be the first or equal, will not accept the other.
      1. +9
        7 May 2018 16: 09
        He noted that in the case of the USSR it was easier, since with the United States there was almost no connection and a common business.

        Because - first you need to think, and then do it, otherwise they chopped wood, now they scratch your turnips)))
        China's real economy is incomparably larger.
        1. +11
          7 May 2018 17: 57
          You know, they refused us. Several people have made such suggestions ...

          They refused ... winked Yes, they, with their several thousand-year history, looked at you as a fresh pile of manure. smile
        2. +2
          7 May 2018 19: 55
          Quote: maxim947
          China's real economy is incomparably larger

          It should be noted that the Chinese economy is largely oriented towards the USA and Europe, if China does not have export and if all TNCs withdraw their production from it, China will be blown away.
          Many people think that China is a giant, but do not take into account who and how this China raised and on what its greatness rests.
          Think about what will happen to the Chinese economy if America collapses?
          1. +2
            7 May 2018 20: 02
            Think about what will happen to the Chinese economy if America collapses?

            China will survive this, and moreover, it will be the first, unlike America, which will fall into states and the first will be Texas, which does not want to share with others.
            but they do not take into account who and how this China raised and on what its greatness rests.

            There is a mutual benefit, remember the American bonds bought by China. Only the Yankees "miscalculated" a little; they, due to their pathological greed for money, finally missed China, so they are furious. This is only a personal opinion))
      2. +2
        7 May 2018 17: 30
        Equal? No, only the first - these are Beijing's plans.
        1. +2
          7 May 2018 17: 38
          Quote: NordUral
          Equal? No, only the first - these are Beijing's plans.

          I would like to be the first, I would already take the necessary steps.
    2. +6
      7 May 2018 16: 08
      What does smart and pragmatic leadership mean in the country!
      Quote: bazzbazz
      "And China is deep within us!" Yes, yes baby) China will still blow everyone!
      Good analytics from an expert!
      1. +6
        7 May 2018 16: 23
        Thoughts are as follows: if Obama was able to become president, then where is the guarantee that years through Tsat, the president will not become "sun cho for tea." and then ... (stop the fantasy ...!)
        1. +4
          7 May 2018 16: 24
          Is that the president of the planet ..
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Thoughts are as follows: if Obama was able to become president, then where is the guarantee that years through Tsat, the president will not become "sun cho for tea." and then ... (stop the fantasy ...!)
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +2
      7 May 2018 21: 07
      Quote: bazzbazz
      "And China is deep within us!" Yes, yes baby) China will still blow everyone!
      Good analytics from an expert!

      You do not understand the main thing. China and the United States work closely, their economies are intertwined. The question is who will be the “senior partner” in tandem.
  2. +12
    7 May 2018 16: 08
    The tragedy of the United States is that, unlike the USSR, in China there is no powerful 5 column ....
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. Dam
    +6
    7 May 2018 16: 16
    It is foolish for China to play as a junior partner in cannibals. Everything goes to that they will become number one
  4. +4
    7 May 2018 16: 26
    Paranoid! Soon, the generals will again start throwing themselves out of the windows, already on a new occasion: "Chineese are comming!"
  5. +14
    7 May 2018 16: 46
    The trouble of the USA is that they do not see and simply cannot imagine coexistence in the world with other states. They have a manic desire to dominate, to be above everyone.
    We see only the tip of the iceberg of events that will determine the face of the world in subsequent decades.
  6. +6
    7 May 2018 16: 55
    Grandpa Bzhe also suggested that we be a "junior partner." The trouble is that the US has no partners, only powerless slaves. Dreaming of the guys. "Friendship and brotherhood are more valuable than wealth." The Russian people are wise. Or friendship, or wealth. Impossible at the same time. And these all run around - let's be friends! Let's! We will rob you, and in return you will do everything that we command you! And why all is against, I do not understand ...
  7. +1
    7 May 2018 17: 24
    The USA does not buy our weapons, but the Chinese bought, buy and will buy and therefore they will never be No. 1 in the World! They stole technology, mastered foreign equipment and decided that they were cool! Do not make me laugh. There are more than three hundred Nobel laureates in the USA, and how many are there in China?
    1. +5
      7 May 2018 19: 00
      You are wrong, your ideas about the Chinese and the prestige of the Nobel Prize are very outdated ...
  8. +7
    7 May 2018 17: 50
    Quote: vlad007
    The USA does not buy our weapons, but the Chinese bought, buy and will buy and therefore they will never be No. 1 in the World! They stole technology, mastered foreign equipment and decided that they were cool! Do not make me laugh. There are more than three hundred Nobel laureates in the USA, and how many are there in China?

    The national composition of the laureates is in the studio ... Don’t offer peace prize winners .. The Nobel Committee has long turned into an office for granting benefits to the poor and wretched. . Not to those who deserve it, but to those who need it. you still remember British scientists, how many laureates are there ... Especially now there are times that it’s not worth exhibiting your scientific developments .. Technology is not everything, its application is experience and skill, the availability of equipment and skills ... This is not for China borrow ... He makes the means of production himself .... But you, for example, own the technology of hammering nails, and it’s unlikely that you will hammer, apparently
  9. +3
    7 May 2018 18: 40
    Well done Chinese! You will not refuse them the ability to defend their interests and increase what they inherited from their fathers!
  10. 0
    7 May 2018 21: 02
    Mattresses do not even imagine how deep China is inside them. China already has them deeply, confidently, regularly.
  11. 0
    7 May 2018 21: 26
    soon the usa will be the youngest partner of china
  12. 0
    7 May 2018 21: 57
    I don’t understand one thing. However, the US business has such a concept as Win-Win Strategy (Win Strategy - Win). And as a rule, it happens that they (the business) follow it. Why is this not done in politics? Is it bad for the States, for example, to contribute to the growth of our economy by lifting sanctions? They will also be able to sell here, with us, more iPhones, hamburgers, turbines for power plants, Microsoft, Boeing, etc. etc. Why is it bad for them? Instead, they shoot with axes, at the risk of running into an otvetka in Syria. Where is the logic?
  13. +1
    7 May 2018 22: 18
    Quote: INTER
    Quote: maxim947
    China's real economy is incomparably larger

    It should be noted that the Chinese economy is largely oriented towards the USA and Europe, if China does not have export and if all TNCs withdraw their production from it, China will be blown away.
    Many people think that China is a giant, but do not take into account who and how this China raised and on what its greatness rests.
    Think about what will happen to the Chinese economy if America collapses?


    Yes nifiga neither those nor the other do not give up. The first time was in the States in 1996. I decided my daughter to buy a soft toy, a cute moose, was made very high quality. And it is precisely made in the USA. In general, he brought it, "was hammered" with his wife into a bubble that it was done in the States. Yeah, well ... My wife climbed the moose in the wool and found the "Made in China" label. And even then, the Americans talked about the dominance of Chinese goods in their market. And they thought what to do with it. And in the 96th it was mainly consumer goods. What now? Dependence only intensified.

    And now there is another trend. The Chinese are building huge technology parks, a la Skolkovo. Near Shanghai, such an industrial park is 10 times more, true. Mostly Chinese people work, who know at least English well. And Europeans, Americans, partly (few) ours, are leading. Moreover, the tasks are set before the experts - to establish a business, share relationships, transfer technologies. They pay very well ...
  14. 0
    7 May 2018 22: 35
    What is hard to understand is such a joy for China.
    NATO will never attack. They can buy everything. But China has a problem - there is not enough living territory, preferably with resources. It is often objected that China has a lot of sparsely populated territory. This is true. But this territory is bad for life. Let's look around the perimeter of China. Where are the sparsely populated areas?
    Moreover, with the current trend in foreign policy, we not only have no allies, worse - all neighbors in the UN only vote in support of China. It is urgent to recognize the DPR, although they will support.
  15. 0
    7 May 2018 23: 04
    They, a female dog, are much more cunning than YOU !!!
  16. 0
    8 May 2018 00: 26
    Okay, China, bear it, wherever you go, Russia - wipe yourself and be afraid, Turkey - already saw this hegemon in her harem ...
    But Keitel will have to remember with his famous: “And these also defeated us ???” when the States will kick not only there, Germany or Spain, but even such powers as Poland, Georgia or Kosovo!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"