Signed defeat of the United States and the SDF at Al Hussein: Truman is waiting for a response, VKS are preparing reinforcements

99


As it became known by the evening of May 3, the “reinforced” carrier-based strike force of the US Navy, led by the nuclear aircraft carrier CVN-75 USS "Harry Truman", as well as 1 cruisers and 6 missile control destroyers weapons with the Aegis systems on board, arrived safely in the eastern Mediterranean under the pretext of comprehensive support for the military operation of the Western coalition led by the US Operation Inherent Resolve to combat terrorist groups of ISIL (prohibited in Russia) . This version is voiced by CNN reporter Ryan Brown on his Twitter page with a link to tweet @USSHARRYSTRUMAN. This news fits perfectly into the final phase of stripping of ISIS’s largest “left-side boiler”, which extends 1 km from the southern village of Mughaylat to Mahfar Jarbiyah (along the Iraqi-Syrian border), as well as a small boiler at the left-hand part of the central part of the left bank, along with a small boiler at the left-bank part of the central part of the left bank, along with a small boiler at the left-bank part of the central part of the left bank, along with a small boiler at the left part of the part of the central part of the left bank, along with a small boiler at the left part of the coast part of the central part of the left bank, along with a small boiler at the left-hand part of the central part of the left bank, along with a small boiler at the left part of the part of the rest part of the central part of the left bank, along with the small boiler on the left part of the part of the rest part of the rest part of the central bank.



Nevertheless, the same news is also a temporary "screen" for hiding the real tasks that are set for the warrant of this mixed AUG. We are talking about delivering another massive missile-bomb strike on strategically important nodes of the Syrian government forces (including air defense, AWACS, RER, communications, etc.), as well as further air support for the breakthrough of the opposition FSA and al-Nusra terrorists from the southern bridgeheads in the direction of Damascus, Homs and Hama. The first strike echelon, of course, will be 200-400 Tomahawk strategic cruise missiles in the RGM-109E / TLAM-C modification (the number varies depending on the configuration of the ammunition for specific missile defense / attack); the second phase of the operation will provide direct air support to ground anti-government forces (FSA, SDF) through the Saudi Arabian Air Force and tactical fighters F / A-18E / F “Super Hornet” 1st wing aviation The US Navy, aboard the Harry Truman. It is for this reason that the coalition OVMS carrier group dropped anchor just 500 km from At-Tanf (south of Cyprus): this distance fully corresponds to the combat radius of the Super Hornets with outboard fuel tanks and full ammunition (taking into account the possibility of conducting air battles).

As a direct prerequisite for new rocket attacks, and then further escalation, we can consider two recent news. First of all, this is the beginning of the training of Kurdish detachments of the “Syrian Democratic Forces”, as well as their American curators of new provocations using chemical weapons. Thus, according to the Syrian secret services, the Al-Jafra oil field located in the depths of the Hushama pocket (more than 25 km from Deir ez-Zor) will be a new region for the next staging of the himataka. The key person in the development of the provocation scenario is the former jihadist from ISIS Mishan Idriz Al Hamash, who apparently was successfully accepted into the ranks of Syrian Democratic Forces.

The hard work of the igilovtsa on the VTS and the forces of the western coalition are not at all surprising, since it has been reliably known that for several years already the tactical "boilers" of jihadists (especially on the eastern bank of the Euphrates) have been used by Washington as a kind of reserve for "cannon fodder" involved in the creation paramilitary units of the "New Syrian Army" / "Army of the North of Syria." US training camps for former IS commanders, as well as the most “smartest and most distinguished” militants, are still actively training “recruits” in Hassek province, while in the cities of Su-Suvar and El-Shadad there are filtration centers SDF and The US Armed Forces, which select more or less thoughtful and accommodating militants, are able to adequately assess the situation and move away from the radical Islamist Sunni ideology in favor of the interests of the Western coalition.

Secondly, a sharp exacerbation of the operational situation on the northern approaches to the city of Deir ez-Zor will also play in favor of the imminent staging of a chemical attack on peaceful Kurdish settlements in the Al-Jafra area. In particular, in 20 in April, in response to the deployment of the Syrian Democratic Forces units in the offensive order in the area of ​​the city of Huweijat al-Maishiya, the engineering units of the Syrian Arab Army set about targeting 165-180-meter pontoon in the narrowest section of the Euphrates. bridge for the transfer of equipment and personnel. And in the afternoon, 29 of April, in order to curb offensive actions by the SDF, units of Syrian militia and Iranian volunteers began to force the Euphrates. Guided by the data from the news section of the regularly updated tactical map of syria.liveuamap.com, we conclude that the second main task of the Syrian militiamen was a quick exit to the east bank of the Euphrates, then lightning-fast pushing off Kurdish fighters "Syrian Defense Forces" from the front lines in the villages of Huweijat al Maishiya, Shamra al-Hisan, Janina and Al-Gia, and, finally, keeping the occupied positions on the east bank until the main mechanized fist CAA arrives through the induced bridge.

This offensive operation of the CAA can be considered a tactically designed military action, since in addition to the main group that forces the Euphrates, the Syrian militia, which previously controlled the territory of the Husham pocket on the eastern coast of the Euphrates, also took part in the assault. The assault on the above villages began on April 29, at about 15: 30. Taking advantage of the operational surprise effect, pro-government forces literally over 3 — 4 hours crushed the Kurdish defensive lines and were able to advance approximately 4 — 4,5 km deep into the territory of Syrian Kurdistan. In addition to the villages listed above, the Syrian militia managed to occupy such strategically important areas as the town of Chakrah (the largest highway from Raqqa passes through it), as well as the northern outskirts of Al Husseinia. Two hours later, the tactical situation began to change. From Raqqa and Es-Suvara, reinforcements from several hundred SDF fighters, supported by the American F-15E, were brought up.

The pro-government units were ousted from 5 populated areas, while the induced crossing underwent a point-to-missile and bombing strike, arresting the movement of the CAA equipment to the east coast. The confrontation lasted for about a day, including night time using lighting projectiles, which was not covered in our media. The result was a complete takeover of Al-Hussein with an 2-kilometer-wide extension of the Husham pocket to the north. Damascus also had a railway link coming from Raqqa and Hasek, the main strongholds of the American presence in the Syrian theater.


This collage illustrates: the moment of the forcing of the Euphrates by Syrian militiamen, as well as the results of their offensive operations on the east bank of the Euphrates in Deir ez-Zor province (left card - April tactical situation on 28, April on right, 29 after the first clashes)


The most controversial moment of all this stories for an unmarried eye, the command of the Syrian armed forces did not decide to use the Buk-М1 / М2 military anti-aircraft missile systems and the Pantsir-С1 anti-aircraft missile and artillery systems to counteract the tactical aviation of the US Air Force, as well as destroy elements precision weapons that destroyed the crossing of the Euphrates River. Perhaps, if these funds were present in the vicinity of Deir-ez-Zor, at least in the number of 4 — 6 complexes covered by the Su-35C pair and the Su-30CM pair, we would not have seen that courage and courage in the actions of the US Air Force flight crew in the next times, and all 6 villages freed from the SDF would remain under the control of the Syrian army. But the reason why these complexes were never used can have very weighty military-political and tactical justifications.

In making major decisions, Damascus always repels itself from the opinion of Moscow in general and from the recommendations of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces in particular. As for the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, he would hardly have given the command of the Syrian air defense forces a cue to use the Pantsirey and the Bukov against the American attack aircraft over the Euphrates, with the alignment of forces and tactical situation observed in this region. For example, the destruction of one F-15E could lead to the fact that for a limited number of Syrian "armor" or "Bukov" would work several combat vehicles MLRS M270 MLRS or M142 HIMARS, as well as transportable howitzers M777, deployed in close proximity to the oil Al-Jafra fields, and this is fraught with the loss of technology. For the formation of a layered air defense system in the Deir-ez-Zor region, it is necessary to transfer the appropriate electronic countermeasures that impede the capabilities of the airborne radar with AFAR AN / APG-82 (V) 1 and AN / APG-79 to effectively detect and accompany the Pantsiri and other self-propelled SAMs in the GMTI / SAR modes with the subsequent issuance of target designation for the same HIMARs.

Such a role can be performed by stations of powerful noise / response impulse noise SNP-4 and SNP-2 operating in the X / Ku-bands of centimeter waves. In parallel with this, in the area of ​​the Euphrates river, it is necessary to deploy modern counter-artillery architects for “Zoo-1M” software, which can calculate in advance the positions of state artillery batteries along the ascending portion of the trajectory of guided artillery shells XM982 “Excalibur”, in the ascending part of the trajectory of guided artillery shells XM30 “Excalibur”, in the ascending part of the trajectory of guided artillery shells XM9 “Excalibur”, in the ascending part of the trajectory of guided artillery shells XM55 “Excalibur” hit them with unguided 9М79К missile systems of the Smerch multiple rocket launcher or several 1МXNUMX "Tochka" tactical ballistic missiles at once. Considering the fact that Zoo XNUMXM has been operating in the Syrian theater of operations for about three years under the control of operators from our contingent, Moscow and Damascus could, within just a few days, form both an echeloned missile defense system over the Euphrates and prepare a decent military technical reserve for a powerful counter-battery response in the US Armed Forces and the SDF units they support.


Ledged radar artillery reconnaissance / reconnaissance positions of receiver and rocket artillery, as well as tactical missile systems 1Л260 "Zoo-1M"


But our side is not in a hurry to resort to such serious measures. Obviously, behind the delays in terms of a direct military response to the Pentagon, there is a need to strengthen the defense capability of the Syrian Arab Army with even more EW, air defense, etc., since the current form of the CAA is unable to repel the massive 400 rocket attack at the same time FSA operations, Saudi Arabian Armed Forces and ISIS militants in several directions in the southern part of the country. And there is absolutely no doubt that the United States will move to larger-scale actions after the first destroyed Strike Eagle.

Anyway, the loss by pro-American “Syrian democratic forces” of the northern suburbs of the settlement of Al-Husseinia on the eastern bank of the Euphrates dealt an impressive blow to the ratings of the Western coalition forces operating in Syrian Kurdistan and in the 55-kilometer security zone. In tactical terms, it created additional difficulties for the Kurdish SDF units in transferring military cargo and personnel in the direction of the front line running along the riverbed. This CAA operation can be considered as Damascus’s first worthy response to the February incident with a massive US air strike against a Syrian militia convoy southeast of Al-Tabiyah when, under the blows of an AC-130 “Spectre” direct air support and attack helicopters AH-64D killed several hundred pro-government Syrian militias.

Outraged by the actions of the Syrian army, the combined headquarters of the Western coalition, as well as the US Air Force command, responded quickly enough: targeted strikes were inflicted on Iranian troops deployed in the area of ​​the village of Makhkan, as well as the city of Al-Asharah, as indicated by data from local correspondents fixed on the tactical map syria.liveuamap.com for April 30 of the year 2018. In tactical terms, they made absolutely no changes in favor of the Pentagon, but they contributed to a marked increase in pre-escalation tensions between the CAA and the Kurds throughout the Euphrates. In accordance with the hopes of the “strategists” from the US defense department, such a heated atmosphere should lead to several more major clashes between Kurdish militants from the SDF (not to be confused with Afrin kurds) with pro-government forces and Iranian units, which will eventually cause counter-battery fire, which will an excellent reason for the imitative explosion of a “pseudo-chemical container” and further shooting of films about “the tyrant Al-Assad, who raised his hand to the peaceful population of Rogava and the American military con Ghent and use 152-mm artillery shells with sarin. " Just a great excuse for declaring a big war, isn't it?

As for the response of the Russian Federation, the military-technical support of the Syrian Arab Army before the large-scale escalation continues to gain momentum not by the day but by the hour. So, the next day after the Syrian army entered the northern neighborhood of Al Husseinia and was actively fighting with Kurdish forces, air traffic monitoring resources noted the arrival of another heavy long-range military transport vehicle An-124-100 (airborne number RA-82035) at Hamim’s airbase who brought new military equipment to Syria; at the same time, another vehicle with the tail number RA-82032, on the contrary, was returning to Russia. In fact, we are witnessing a real “Syrian air express”, which inspires great confidence regarding the future plans of Moscow to defend its interests in Western Asia.

Not far behind and the sea "Syrian Express." For example, in April and early May alone, hundreds of pieces of military equipment, ammunition sets and electronic equipment were delivered to the logistics center in Tartus using 4 large landing ships of 775 / II Minsk Avenue (No. 127) and Azov ( No.151), and also pr. 1171 Orsk (No.148) and Nikolay Filchenkov (No.152). It is obvious that the supply of new air defense systems to Damascus, about which military-diplomatic sources have recently spoken, has already begun. Well, we will wait for the first results.

Information sources:
https://riafan.ru/1052291-siriya-novosti-29-aprelya-22-30-vvs-mezhdunarodnoi-koalicii-atakovali-soyuznikov-saa-v-deir-ez-zore-v-idlibe-poyavilsya-novyi-vooruzhennyi-alyans
http://anna-news.info/svodka-sobytij-v-sirii-i-na-blizhnem-vostoke-za-29-aprelya-2018-goda/
http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo/pvo_vvs/reb_spn-4.html
http://www.interfax.ru/world/611087
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

99 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    7 May 2018 05: 48
    As the experience of previous military companies showed .. The effectiveness of air strikes without the support of ground forces is very low ... So it will be the transfer of axes to scrap metal ...
    1. +18
      7 May 2018 07: 00
      It is difficult to disagree with this, but there is one "BUT" ....
      You forgot that the FSA also has ground forces, these are Kurds from the SDF, these are the ISIS remnants, this is the Arab cesspool, sorry coalition ....
      1. +7
        7 May 2018 07: 32
        Turkey quite understands the Kurds ... IS ... well, little by little we are pushing ... The Arab coalition ... Yemen is there ... That's why there is a tantrum about the S-300 ... the trick is that exclude US aviation ... and the rest is already being decided ...
        1. +19
          7 May 2018 07: 58
          This is provided that the Turks as a weather vane will not change direction ....
          Ours, although they want to bind Turkey to themselves, but Erdogan, the same Erdogan .... wassat
          1. +5
            7 May 2018 08: 13
            East, of course, is a delicate matter ... only the USA organized a conspiracy whose purpose was to kill Erdogan ... So let's hope that he wants to live ...
            1. +12
              7 May 2018 10: 50
              R. Erdogan has his own problems and strategy and solves only them, there are already agreements with the United States regarding the northern Kurds of Syria. By this, only Iran is a reliable ally, and even then our people betray it at the request of Israel. If the United States began to force out the Russian Federation and Iran to please Israel, then the stakes are already the highest, because the Russian Federation should take the most drastic measures, including declaring the use of tactical nuclear weapons in defense of Syrian statehood, and with respect to the US troops and navy, otherwise we squeezed and thrown out of Syria like kittens. Also, connect China, otherwise the defeat of our forces will give confidence in the future by military means to solve problems in other conflicts. And all the efforts of the Russian Federation in Syria will go to waste in addition to the loss of full authority and influence throughout the world ... Such a development was expected, and why our strategists and the Foreign Ministry seemed to be aback, assuring of the victory over terrorism in Syria .. .
              1. Dam
                +3
                7 May 2018 11: 53
                Blah blah blah. Wet dreams. Good luck in self-gratification
              2. +7
                7 May 2018 15: 14
                Connect China ???? laughing I haven’t laughed like that for a long time. In Beijing, there are no imbicillas. They never bind to losers, only squeeze the juice out of them. Take an interest in what conditions China gave the last loan to Venezuela.
                Why is there a shortage of food in Turkmenistan.
            2. 0
              7 May 2018 23: 16
              Quote: Vard
              The United States organized a conspiracy whose purpose was to kill Erdogan ...

              If this, of course, was not a staging of the USA and Turkey ...
          2. +3
            7 May 2018 14: 26
            Quote: jonht
            Ours, although they want to bind Turkey to themselves, but Erdogan, the same Erdogan ....

            And what about Erdogan? All Turks are such, optional people, ordinary market traders!
            We should ask the United States at the UN Security Council if they are thinking of abandoning the controlled chaos terror doctrine? If they don’t think, then it is necessary at the UN level and declare them the country of terrorism; for only a person very far from politics can be inspired with “good intentions” this programmed action of a shock naval group, without any invitation from Syria, given their support for their “children!”
            1. +2
              7 May 2018 17: 44
              The unipolar dictatorship of the United States was created in the quarter century after the collapse of the USSR, and the worst thing is that the world has turned into an obedient herd, even Europe will not re-read clearly US criminal acts. There is no one to say and declare the United States a terrorist; the United States alone declares a terrorist whomever it wants on a whim. The transition to a multipolar world begins, and this may not be painful, even bloody. Growing China and the Russian Federation are returning multipolarity, the resistance to this is seen in the reaction of the United States and NATO countries to the Russian Federation - accusations of everything and for the slightest artificial reasons .. Therefore, we must act collectively with possible allies (Iran, Turkey ...) and, most importantly, with China ...
              1. +5
                7 May 2018 19: 10
                Quote: Vladimir 5
                The unipolar dictatorship of the United States was created in the quarter century after the collapse of the USSR, and the worst thing is that the world has turned into an obedient herd, even Europe will not re-read clearly US criminal acts. There is no one to say and declare the United States a terrorist; the United States alone declares a terrorist whomever it wants on a whim. The transition to a multipolar world begins, and this may not be painful, even bloody. Growing China and the Russian Federation are returning multipolarity, the resistance to this is seen in the reaction of the United States and NATO countries to the Russian Federation - accusations of everything and for the slightest artificial reasons .. Therefore, we must act collectively with possible allies (Iran, Turkey ...) and, most importantly, with China ...

                Well, what multipolarity, what are you talking about? The polarity is the same everywhere - money. Another imperialist war for markets in which the Fed wins.
                1. 0
                  7 May 2018 22: 05
                  Both the WWII and WWII were also for influence and money between states (allocated by the USSR, ideologically and not for money), and the Fed came out as the main winner in the western union of states. Then there was two polarity. Everything is changing, the USSR has collapsed, the world has become a monopolar. The Russian Federation is resurrecting, China is growing, again claims to multipolarity, new alliances of states are being created, and the Fed is again a challenge, and the winner is still in question. You do not cover quite objective facts and different alliances of countries with the darling of primitivism, for countries are not fighting alone with their imperialist interests. , but not in a common crowd.
    2. +4
      7 May 2018 11: 51
      The effectiveness of ground operations without cover from air attacks is also no. This is a strategic dead end. It's time for someone to break such a game.
    3. 0
      9 May 2018 19: 19
      Naive, bad cannon fodder in bulk from the staff of the United States, they were sent to our and Syrian heads.
  2. +12
    7 May 2018 06: 43
    Thanks to the author for the review of the situation. One thing is clear that nothing good can be expected for the Syrian army and from the American coalition. Apparently, a large-scale war on the nose and Russia will be difficult to avoid it.
    1. +1
      7 May 2018 12: 23
      Quote: rotmistr60
      nothing good for the Syrian army and we can not expect from the American coalition. Apparently, a large-scale war on the nose and Russia will be difficult to avoid it.

      Forever something bothers us. Like that dancer ...
      1. 0
        11 May 2018 16: 02
        It is clear that the United States also wants to avoid a direct clash in Syria. For Syria is clearly not worth it to destroy each other. Powerful bunches and puffing up cheeks don't mean wars
  3. 0
    7 May 2018 07: 05
    Is there one way out? At the airfields?
  4. +2
    7 May 2018 07: 50
    Grandma Wang seemed to be right about Syria. A stone on a stone from it will not leave.
  5. +4
    7 May 2018 08: 13
    I love arguments on military topics from the category: “they can’t” ... The Israeli-Arab wars clearly showed that “they can” are smart and courageous and that “they cannot” are those whom God offended with their brains and courage ....
  6. +8
    7 May 2018 09: 26
    The moment of truth is drawing near. The Americans, in accordance with their logic of escalation, cannot but strike, and Russia cannot but answer. The game of nerves and general staffists begins.
    1. +5
      7 May 2018 19: 13
      Falling! It will be as always - agree laughing Ideologically and economically, the Russian Federation and the USA are relatives of the capitalists. No one needs losses, everyone understands this.
      1. 0
        16 June 2018 18: 49
        The element of unpredictability, disguised as chance or as a manifestation of initiative from below, will always be present - this is the time. And two, these - the American (and all the rest in bulk) the American want to stupidly dispossess in their personal interests, which doesn’t really appeal to our people and resist what they are quite determined to do. And they try to rally us - with the idea of ​​corporatism, common interests - just what the Germans bought offended by the outcome of the 1st World War in 1933 - normal Russians are not very happy with the collapse of the USSR in 1991 and perceive this event ( by analogy), as a defeat of one’s own country.
  7. +4
    7 May 2018 09: 53
    While there are positional battles of the Syrian militias, cleansing and preparation is ongoing in the center of Syria. But a great war is more real than ever.
  8. +14
    7 May 2018 09: 53
    The Syrian sky should become a grave both for the USAF and for the world domination of the USA as a whole. Completely and completely.
    1. +5
      7 May 2018 13: 33
      Quote: avia12005
      Syrian sky must to become a grave for the US Air Force and for US global dominance as a whole. Completely and definitively.

      And the sun "must" shine solely in accordance with the wise decisions of the party and government. Must! BUT, for some reason it shines according to other laws.
      1. 0
        9 May 2018 17: 34
        A normal person should not write false nonsense like
        And the sun "must" shine solely in accordance with the wise decisions of the party and government.
        But there are those who write.
  9. 0
    7 May 2018 10: 42
    I remember in Iraq rockets periodically flew off in the wrong direction and fell on the wrong ones. The USA then accused some Petersburg company. If possible, then why not help these Tomahawks to fall on the heads of the Allies if they are launched.
    1. 0
      7 May 2018 10: 52
      Not only in Iraq. When Yugoslavia was hollowed, and flew to the Jewish brothers. Even somewhere in Sofia, axes fell.
      1. 0
        9 May 2018 10: 33
        Quote: Nikolai Petrov
        When Yugoslavia was hollowed

        Arrived at the Chinese Embassy, ​​probably by chance ... I guess they turned on the microwave
  10. 0
    7 May 2018 11: 00
    Quote: spectr
    I remember in Iraq rockets periodically flew off in the wrong direction and fell on the wrong ones. The USA then accused some Petersburg company. If possible, then why not help these Tomahawks to fall on the heads of the Allies if they are launched.

    ... yeah - on the chosen ones ...
  11. +2
    7 May 2018 11: 01
    Quote: avia12005
    The Syrian sky should become a grave both for the USAF and for the world domination of the USA as a whole. Completely and completely.

    And why did you post a photo of a brown bear? Does this kind of animal have anything to do with the Syrian sky? (sorry no facepalm emoticon)
    1. +4
      7 May 2018 19: 16
      Quote: Dimid
      Quote: avia12005
      The Syrian sky should become a grave both for the USAF and for the world domination of the USA as a whole. Completely and completely.

      And why did you post a photo of a brown bear? Does this kind of animal have anything to do with the Syrian sky? (sorry no facepalm emoticon)

      But the photo is good, right? Oh, I love the children of Nature! drinks
      1. 0
        10 May 2018 10: 35
        Photo is good, I agree. That's just not on that forum and in the wrong topic. Let's all begin to upload cool pictures of tigers, eagles, deer, bunnies, jerboas here ... To whom, to your liking. That will be fun ....
    2. 0
      8 May 2018 04: 23
      just in Syria for him there are no enemies not on earth, not in heaven in the animal kingdom.
      1. 0
        10 May 2018 10: 33
        Well, yes .... but for a Nile crocodile in some Russian Volga there are also no enemies on earth, "not in heaven" in the animal kingdom.
        Are brown bears found in Syria? Or are you going to get them there? Do you think they will survive?
        What does the brown bear and Syria have to do with it ???
  12. +2
    7 May 2018 11: 35
    Quote: zulusuluz
    Is there one way out? At the airfields?

    - Voronezh ?? wassat request
  13. +2
    7 May 2018 11: 45
    Quote: Guru
    While there are positional battles of the Syrian militias, cleansing and preparation is ongoing in the center of Syria. But a great war is more real than ever.

    - It did not become real during the war in Korea (1950-53), it did not become during the war in Vietnam (1965-73), with which hangover it will become "possible" now that the US has become much stronger and Russia is incredibly weaker than the USSR?
    When a block of China hangs over Russia, always ready to provide humanitarian assistance after exchanging Russian nuclear strikes with the Americans, sending 200-30 million volunteers ?! Both Washington and the Kremlin understand this. Only forum hamsters do not understand this ...
    1. +1
      7 May 2018 11: 53
      Quote: Outsider
      Only forum hamsters do not understand this ...

      So we have to decide: do we need humanitarian aid from China? Humanitarian aid from the US does not help.
    2. 0
      9 May 2018 17: 47
      Only forum hamsters do not understand this ...
      I am always amused by gophers with their 3 classes of central schoolchildren, who sincerely consider themselves giants washed, and all the rest - hamsters. After the exchange of Russian nuclear strikes with the Americans in Beijing, heavy fallout is expected and they will have slightly more urgent problems than sending 200-300 million people to certain death in a scorched radioactive desert. Wise guy, damn it.
    3. 0
      10 May 2018 12: 58
      find today at least one Chinese who will say that he wants to fight with Russia and pick up something from her, do you have the category of the 70s?
  14. +1
    7 May 2018 11: 49
    Quote: Nikolai Petrov
    Not only in Iraq. When Yugoslavia was hollowed, and flew to the Jewish brothers. Even somewhere in Sofia, axes fell.

    - Are those those who through their airspace did not let 10 An-12 with the paratroopers of the Tambov Airborne Division into Pristina? And today they will miss Russian planes?
  15. +3
    7 May 2018 12: 07
    It is necessary to give a worthy answer to the Americans, and not to chatter: “We will destroy missiles and delivery vehicles.” They, seeing such passivity of the RF Armed Forces, are getting impudent every day.
  16. +4
    7 May 2018 13: 07
    It would be great if the authors displayed the accuracy of the forecasts. Or the article would have a date when it can be checked and we could go to the article on that date and compare. It's sad to look at hat-writing articles in 2-4 years
    1. 0
      7 May 2018 13: 46
      The compilation of facts by this author is very good, but analytics is not so good. But as they say in one neighboring country: - Mayo, sho mayo.
  17. 0
    7 May 2018 14: 23
    Our military often needs to arrange for the United States to play tricks and provocations. And the United States will immediately recall international law and an honest war. And immediately it will be easier to agree with them.
    1. 0
      9 May 2018 10: 35
      Quote: steel maker
      fair war

      And what is it? It’s like one country announces another - so we will attack you at noon tomorrow, we’ll kill you a bit, and you, too, a little?
    2. 0
      9 May 2018 18: 39
      Quote: steel maker
      Our military often needs to arrange for the United States to play tricks and provocations. And the United States will immediately recall international law and an honest war. And immediately it will be easier to agree with them.

      Do you want to say our military = tricks and provocations?
  18. 0
    7 May 2018 15: 20
    Quote: steel maker
    Our military often needs to arrange for the United States to play tricks and provocations. And the United States will immediately recall international law and an honest war. And immediately it will be easier to agree with them.

    Wagnerites have already tried ...
    1. 0
      9 May 2018 17: 53
      Wagnerites have already tried ..
      Yes, and quite successfully. But lovers of the United States with Echo Matza, coupled with Bandera, were offended by their hegemon and launched a duck about 200 two hundredths.
  19. +1
    7 May 2018 15: 41
    It’s a pity that we betrayed the Kurds. Such and such fighters for freedom and independence with a pronounced communist ethics.
    1. 0
      10 May 2018 13: 05
      we didn’t betray the kudos and led to autonomy, it was they who, according to the principle, had chosen other patrons more strongly.
  20. +2
    7 May 2018 16: 26
    Strengthen and strengthen Syria. As soon as you see that their planes are being shot down, the ships are drowned, and scorched earth remains at the place of military units, they will come to their senses. Because. that these insects understand only power. Destroy the locusts by all available means and GOD will help you.
  21. +1
    7 May 2018 16: 55
    Quote: KOLEGAN
    Strengthen and strengthen Syria. As soon as you see that their planes are being shot down, the ships are drowned, and scorched earth remains at the place of military units, they will come to their senses. Because. that these insects understand only power. Destroy the locusts by all available means and GOD will help you.
    It’s not in this scenario, your plan will go as trophies, as in the Arab-Israeli conflict
  22. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      8 May 2018 02: 34
      Quote: Georgy Meskhi
      He will never start a war with the United States. His own surroundings will choke. They do not need war.


      apparently only you know this, but the American command chose the whole week in April to hit so that the Russians would not be hurt inadvertently.
      As for Putin’s entourage, they were against the annexation of Crimea, so what changed?
  23. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      8 May 2018 00: 59
      Why did Saakashvili eat the tie? So Russia is not out of fear. But the USA and Israel are serious forces, no one argues.
    2. +2
      8 May 2018 02: 31
      Quote: Georgy Meskhi
      And Georgia hit it in 5 days


      it was without any modernization obsolete Su-24, Su-25 aircraft and one Tu-22 bomber.
      And it’s not you who shot down the Ukrainian beeches that were handed over to Georgia by the President of Ukraine Yushenko, along with trained Ukrainian crews and a powerful radar.
      And he filled up Ukrainian beeches, destroyed the radar and all the air defense of Georgia with one SU-34 (it was then our only modern one in the amount of 2 pieces). How much the Russian Army has grown can be seen by the number of SU-34 we have now, and this is 107 pieces.
      Russia thought about the modernization of the post-Soviet army only after the 2008 war. And now for weapons that have no analogues in the world, we are ahead and our army is the second in the world.
      1. +2
        9 May 2018 11: 19
        Quote: lopvlad
        And it’s not you who shot down the Ukrainian beeches that were handed over to Georgia by the President of Ukraine Yushenko, along with trained Ukrainian crews and a powerful radar.

        Ichtamnet
        1.On August 8, at about 18:00 p.m., a Su-25BM from the 368th ShAP (pilot Oleg Terebunsky) was shot down in the Zarsky Pass area from MANPADS by the South Ossetian military, who mistook it for the Georgian attack aircraft, and the fall and wreckage were captured by Russian journalists.
        2. Morning on August 9 - Tu-22M3 from the 52nd TBAP (KVS-Alexander Koventsov), shot down near the village of Karbauli, Georgian air defense, presumably with the help of the Osa-AKM air defense system.
        3.August 9, around 10:20 - Su-24M from the GLITS crew (crew Igor Zinov and Igor Rzhavitin), shot down in the area of ​​the village of Shindisi by Georgians from MANPADS.
        4. August 9 at about 10:30 - Su-25SM from the 368th ShAP (pilot Sergei Kobylash), shot down from MANPADS south of Tskhinval, presumably by the South Ossetian military, who announced at that time the destruction of the Georgian attack aircraft.
        5. Evening on August 9 - Su-25BM from the 368th ShAP (pilot Vladimir Edamenko), shot down over Java by Russian military air defense with the help of ZSU-23-4 "Shilka", which also announced the destruction of the Georgian attack aircraft.
        6. August 11 at about 11:00 - Su-24M from the Lipetsk Pulp and Paper Mill (crew names unknown), shot down west of Tskhinvali from MANPADS by the Russian military, who mistakenly mistook him for an enemy aircraft.
        And he filled up Ukrainian beeches, destroyed the radar and all the air defense of Georgia, one SU-34

        hero plane
        To deprive the enemy of the ability to detect and shoot down our attack aircraft and reconnaissance aircraft, the command ordered the Su-24M crew, consisting of Major Sergeyev and Captain Shpitonkov, to destroy the enemy’s radar control and guidance post. The station was 17 kilometers from Gori
        Aware of the risk, the navigator Nikolay Shpitonkov set the course that was most favorable for striking. At the same time, the crew commander was able to skillfully conduct a bomber and create the opportunity for Shpitonkova to launch missiles.
        Guided missiles hit the target - the radar observation post was destroyed. All this happened at night, in complete darkness. And then Shpitonkov likewise destroyed a radar station located near Tbilisi.
        1. +1
          9 May 2018 16: 45
          Everything that you, Bandera, wrote, is a dirty stinking, long refuted lie, published in 2009 for the authorship of a certain unknown under the pseudonym Anton Lavrov in the English-language journal Moscow Defense Brief. To believe such a fake - do not respect yourself. The truth is this:
          • Su-25 - shot down by a rocket on August 8 south of Tskhinvali during an attack on a convoy of Georgian troops. Pilot Lieutenant Colonel Oleg Terebunsky successfully ejected.
          • Tu-22M3 - shot down by a beech on the night of August 8-9 during a reconnaissance flight. One crew member was captured (Major Vyacheslav Malkov), two were killed (navigators Major Viktor Pryadkin and Major Igor Nesterov), one was missing (Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Koventsov). The flight was carried out at high altitude and could not be shot down by Osa.
          • Su-25 - shot down on August 9 by a beech in the Java region. Pilot Major Vladimir Edamenko (flight commander) ejected too late and died. He was posthumously awarded the title of Hero of Russia.
          • Su-25 - shot down by a beech on August 9th. Pilot Colonel Sergei Kobylash (commander of the 368th Assault Aviation Regiment, Budyonnovsk) ejected and was evacuated by helicopter. Awarded the title of Hero of Russia
          Su-24 9 in August in the conflict zone, two pilots of the Flight Test Service of fighter and front-line aviation of the 929 State Flight Test Center of the Ministry of Defense named after Chkalova - test pilot Colonel Igor Zinov and test navigator Colonel Igor Rzhavitin. Igor Zinov was captured and was released on August 19. Igor Rzhavitin died and was posthumously awarded the title of Hero of Russia.
          You should have quoted Sykashvili’s statement, which on August 12 announced on 21 a downed Russian plane.
          Colonel General Anatoly Nogovitsin said about this fake: "The Russian side has long been announced full data on the losses of the Russian armed forces incurred in repelling Georgia’s aggression against South Ossetia. These data are complete and there’s nothing to add to them. As for any insinuations regarding the fact that the Russian Air Force planes were shot down by their own air defense forces, then this is also in no way true.
  24. +3
    7 May 2018 23: 38
    The United States is always where poppy and oil fields are. Apparently there democracy is grown
  25. +1
    8 May 2018 02: 14
    The first strike train, of course, will be 200-400 Tomahawk strategic cruise missiles in the RGM-109E / TLAM-C modification (the number varies depending on the configuration of the ammunition for specific missile defense / attack); the second phase of the operation will provide direct air support to ground anti-government forces (FSA, SDF) through the Saudi Arabian Air Force and the F / A-18E / F Super Hornet tactical fighter of the 1st US Navy carrier-based aircraft wing aboard the Harry Truman .


    this is the third world nuclear war and therefore this is real nonsense. The author to withdraw and shoot behind the shed for a fruitful textualism.
    1. +2
      8 May 2018 04: 27
      30min later, Harry Truman will cease to exist as av, and this action will be the last from the hegemon.
    2. +2
      8 May 2018 22: 31
      I fully agree with you. Hurray patriotics and haters
      1. 0
        9 May 2018 19: 37
        Do you sit with your hands up? Hat-making, of course, is a stupid thing, but there is a problem and we will not get anywhere from it.
    3. 0
      9 May 2018 10: 39
      Quote: lopvlad
      this is the third world nuclear war and so this is real nonsense

      Well, what is the third world and also nuclear, does Syria have nuclear weapons? The usual local conflict without far-reaching consequences, it is necessary to throw a competitor in the form of Iran from Syria, which will be done, and no one will especially lift a finger in his defense
      1. 0
        10 May 2018 15: 15
        this competitor the first thing the Strait of Hormuz will not block?
  26. +2
    8 May 2018 09: 28
    Just fired back, then he has a dagger in the hollow ....
  27. +1
    8 May 2018 17: 50
    Quote: avia12005
    The Syrian sky should become a grave both for the USAF and for the world domination of the USA as a whole. Completely and completely.

    On vacation or something, not shaved like that.
  28. +1
    8 May 2018 22: 29
    When did carrier aircraft lose base? Just one example ...
    That’s why you need to “dance”
    1. 0
      10 May 2018 13: 17
      Irina an air group even lost three aircraft carriers with support from the islands in Vietnam. an indisputable fact with a significant minority of the coninetal group of aircraft.
      1. +2
        10 May 2018 14: 24
        “support” only from Danang made 10 times more sorties, partly to prevent this air group from setting fire or drowning
        1. 0
          11 May 2018 15: 46
          so one asks why these troughs are needed. Once the aircraft carriers won dominance and broke the course of the war, but now they need to clear the sky and water, and the earth by other means
          1. 0
            11 May 2018 18: 40
            if it was about the war in the Pacific Ocean then it was broken by American submarines destroying Japanese tankers
            1. 0
              11 May 2018 19: 05
              if you are talking about the war in the Pacific, then there was a war of two economies. The Japanese also had aircraft carriers, but they did not help them. Just the aircraft carriers and aviation, and the submarines, and logistics (transport!) The Americans had more and better ... while aircraft carriers were the key to victory at sea. Do you want to win - the formation of aircraft carriers. Now aircraft carriers are a lame leg. No covert deployment. Real time tracking. The threat arises as soon as it leaves the base, then the threat only grows, as more and more new weapons, including hidden ones, are included. Now, with the help of container Gauges, any bulk carrier can be a deadly threat to AUG. Now now the “Dagger" has appeared.
              1. 0
                11 May 2018 19: 22
                limping
                the war on the pacific ocean was won by American submarines that simply left Japanese aviation and the fleet without fuel
                1. 0
                  11 May 2018 19: 31
                  you’re talking about means, and I’m talking about the reasons ... yes, the Americans built boats, provided them with all sorts of nishtyaks, such as radars ... So they also built a lot of other things - liberty transports, flying fortresses, fighters, ships .. All this power crushed Japan, which got involved in the war with very little resources. They would not have a chance in the Russo-Japanese war, (resources!) But at that time the Russian Empire was on the verge of dying.
                  1. 0
                    11 May 2018 19: 42
                    Now an aircraft with an AB can easily destroy a submarine, or a Tu-142, in the case of an NK, it is not easy but fast
                    it’s the same thing, only 100 boats coped with it because the Japanese trankers almost didn’t cover themselves with an escort until they were completely lost, then we had to carry fuel by air
                    in fact, even after the victory in the Pacific Ocean, the Americans had no chance to land in Japan, and if the USSR did not quickly get rid of it in Manchuria, a Japanese bacteriological response would fly to them, so the Russian soldier saved the world again.
                    against the Russian Empire, Japan was helped by all who were not lazy, mainly internal saboteurs who needed the first revolutionary situation.
                    1. +1
                      11 May 2018 19: 57
                      As for "easily" - I would argue ... The submarine, unlike the aircraft carrier, is a secretive weapon, it still needs to be found at a depth of up to a kilometer and destroyed there ... but the aircraft carrier is in sight. And the "arm" of the submarine is now stretched for 500 km, and not 5 km, as before ... in the USSR it was customary to consider the destruction of the AUG as a regiment of bombers with a probability of 50%. In the Falkland War, one (!) Plane with two anti-ship missiles nearly threw the bottom of an English aircraft carrier ... somehow everyone forgot about it.
                      1. 0
                        11 May 2018 20: 03
                        it has neither air defense nor missile defense and AB arm is longer
                        they then carried only one at a time, and were accompanied by significant forces; they destroyed only one container ship and one destroyer of the radar patrol
    2. 0
      10 May 2018 14: 35
      won once, but they were wrong vertical lines lol
      1. 0
        11 May 2018 19: 12
        Are you talking about the Falkland War?
        1. 0
          11 May 2018 19: 24
          yeah, she’s Malvinian
          1. 0
            11 May 2018 19: 59
            Germans in the Mediterranean Sea sank the aircraft carrier "Illastries" with their "pieces."
            1. 0
              11 May 2018 20: 17
              it was another illustries drinks
              this is probably why at the end of 1942 the Americans landed in Africa not in the Mediterranean, violating the neutrality of French Morocco
    3. 0
      11 May 2018 15: 47
      the aircraft carrier is obviously weaker than the airfield. Sorry, but this is obvious.
      1. 0
        11 May 2018 18: 40
        not everyone and this is only in a non-nuclear war
        1. 0
          11 May 2018 20: 17
          YELLOWSTONE, you yourself wrote that the Americans from Vietnam did a lot of extra work to secure their aircraft carriers. Well, the question is - what is the use of them, what is the use of Kuznetsov in the Mediterranean Sea, what is the use of Truman in the Persian Gulf? Drive the Ishilovites in the gardens? If there is the slightest threat of drowning, the commander’s hair on his ass stand on end from the thought that he could lose the toy for ten lard and the air group for 10 other lard. Therefore, efforts to ensure safety are simply titanic. And these efforts can not be compared with a useful exhaust.
          1. 0
            11 May 2018 20: 26
            they brought in some element of surprise, but they created more visibility
            sense can be in a non-nuclear war only against atolls, or to blur pressure or destroy the enemy’s naval forces, or destroy the naval strategic nuclear forces in front of it
  29. 0
    9 May 2018 12: 15
    The war will be. Mandatory. And the only question is that it should become the 3rd World War, and not "Russia against all." This is what we need to prepare for. No matter how scary it is, one must not close his eyes and do not execute the verses: "... let everything slow down, if only there would be no war." The worst thing is not war, as we saw in the 41st, but the fact that we are not ready for it.
    1. 0
      10 May 2018 13: 23
      it even dawned on Trump that atomic warfare was not needed (DPRK). we don’t need anything in our territory either. everything else political settlement with the defense of one’s interests
  30. 0
    9 May 2018 16: 45
    my colleagues are good at driving, war is always a failure of state policy, have Putin and Medvedev really been chosen for this ...
    1. 0
      9 May 2018 19: 33
      I would like your faith in what they chose (or did not choose them, like me, for example). Yes, and they have confidence and will, if they are capable of it at all. One thing is clear, Moscow is behind again, and it is impossible to surrender it either in Syria or at home.

      Congratulations to all on Victory Day! A bow to the veterans and human gratitude! Live long respected old people and be a living reproach and a reminder to the new fascists!
  31. +1
    9 May 2018 17: 44
    We must continue to supply weapons and make it clear that any land operation of the combined coalition forces will be considered as aggression against a sovereign state.
  32. 0
    9 May 2018 19: 26
    One thing is clear, neither the Syrians nor we should retreat. And in Moscow, everyone is playing victory, but in fact, it is high time to switch to a mobilization economy. Syria is only a stage in the ideas of completely corroded Anglo-Saxons.
    And to form a military alliance against the West, so much so that thoughts do not appear in their bad heads about an attack on us and our allies.
    And China needs to understand that it will be able to sit out when all this new-fascist pack collapses on us, but it will be its turn, and we will be gone.
    Maybe in Moscow and in Beijing, but who knows where else they will think about the fate of their countries and peoples.
    And today, when we celebrate the holidays of the Great Victory.
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. 0
    11 May 2018 15: 29
    in order to strike, AUG is not needed there at all. There are enough ground airfields in Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Carriers are an element of politics. First, Putin got Kuznetsov out of his wide legs, now Trump is indulging ...
  35. 0
    11 May 2018 20: 13
    YELLOWSTONE, you yourself wrote that the Americans from Vietnam did a lot of unnecessary work to secure their aircraft carriers. Well, the question is - what is the use of them, what is the use of Kuznetsov in the Mediterranean Sea, what is the use of Truman in the Persian Gulf? Drive the Ishilovites in the gardens?
    1. 0
      12 May 2018 13: 20
      takeoff of aircraft from Kuze is not recorded by the broads, and there they are safer from them
      Americans after Vietnam, the concept was Sea Control Ship
  36. 0
    12 May 2018 14: 45
    I would recall the fate of S. Hussein in particular on Iraq and others like them in Iraq and in general. The latter also famously fought with Iran with US support.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"