Six Day War. Part of 3. Unbiased and impartial
The Arab-Israeli conflict, which lasted two thirds of a century, is still a largely unknown war. In Soviet times, reliable information about the course of hostilities was virtually inaccessible: the official press preferred to keep silent about the reasons for the defeats of its Arab allies, limiting themselves to ritual curses against the "Israeli military". After the collapse of the USSR, several informative books on small stories the Arab-Israeli wars, the Internet is full of journalistic tales, articles, sinful factual errors, superficial knowledge of the subject, and sometimes deliberate speculations, distortions of historical reality, etc.
The publication of the first two parts of the series on the Six-Day War revealed a certain interest among the readers of the Military Review. Along with positive feedback, readers made a number of comments:
“An interesting article, of course, the sources to which the author refers are very specific, so the material was very tendentious.”
“I have read so many times, including here, articles about the victorious march of the Israeli army, that I want a look from the other side or a neutral assessment of events. For example, estimates of Soviet military historians. "
Readers should be listened to, constructive criticism to accept and draw appropriate conclusions.
And this part of the series will be devoted mainly to the vision of the events taking place by the other side. Here is the view of Soviet historians and the opinion of the Arabs - the direct participants in the events. At the same time, as they say, you cannot throw words out of a song: a text without censorship. In it there is a sharpness of statements and tough anti-Israeli rhetoric. I allow myself some explanations or comments on the course of the story. (They are enclosed in brackets and in italics.) Well, how much all this is unbiased and impartial, to judge you, dear readers.
Here's how to describe what is happening. Soviet historians.
After triple aggression (meaning "Suez Campaign") The Middle East conflict has entered a new phase, characterized by the fact that the forces of imperialism have even more actively begun to use the aggressiveness and expansionism of the Israeli ruling elite in the struggle against the Arab national liberation movement. The Zionist ideology prevailing in Israel served as the basis for the official doctrine of territorial expansion, the seizure of the lands of neighboring Arab states and the expulsion of the indigenous population from them.
The military-economic plans of Israel completely and completely met the interests of the Western powers. The leaders of Israel, encouraged by them, accelerated the militarization of the country. The appropriation for military spending in 1966–67 reached 30% of the budget. By 1967, the Israeli armed forces received a large amount of modern weapons from Western countries, including hundreds tanks, aircraft and several dozen auxiliary ships, large-caliber artillery, anti-aircraft missiles and modern electronic equipment.
The General Staff has developed a plan of war against the Arab countries, which was based on the principle of "lightning war." Its essence was a sudden raid aviation to the airfields of the Arab countries, the destruction of aircraft and gaining air supremacy, decisive actions of tank and mechanized formations with the active support of aviation to defeat the ground forces of the Arab countries.
The first strike was planned to inflict on Egypt. The plan envisaged the forces of infantry formations to break through the defenses of the Egyptian troops, by introducing tank groups to develop an offensive against the Suez Canal, to cut off Egyptian troops on the Sinai Peninsula, to slash and destroy them in parts. The landing of an airborne assault in the region of Sharm el-Sheikh to seize the seaport, to ensure the navigation of Israel around the Gulf of Aqaba Subsequently, defeat the Jordanian troops west of the Jordan River and seize Jerusalem. In conclusion, launch an offensive against Syria to capture the Golan Heights and advance towards Damascus.
Israeli aviation produced detailed aerial photographs of military facilities in Egypt, Syria and Jordan. Detailed information was collected on the armed forces of the Arab states (their size, armament, deployment), and targets were set for aviation. By the beginning of the war, the Israeli Air Force had detailed maps with objects on which it was necessary to strike.
The ruling circles of the United States and England not only supported the militaristic plans of Israel, but also prepared to render him military assistance. Since the end of May 1967 the ships of the 6th American fleet with marines in readiness cruised in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. In early June, England sent two aircraft carriers and a compound of bombers to the Middle East.
Arab governments regarded Israeli actions as preparations for a new territorial expansion and activated the search for countermeasures. Initiated by Nasser in January 1964(!) This year, the first pan-Arab meeting of heads of state was held in Cairo, at which the issue of pooling efforts to counter Israel’s threat was discussed. The meeting also considered issues of support that should have been given to the Palestinian national liberation movement. During this period, Fatah organizations and some other Palestinian groups emerged. At the end of May 1964, the first Palestinian National Congress was held in East Jerusalem, at which the creation of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) was announced. Congress adopted the National Charter and approved the Charter of the PLO. From January 1965, Fatah began to conduct separate partisan actions on Israeli territory. Israel took advantage of these actions as a pretext for new attacks on Arab countries, hoping to force them to take tough measures against the Palestinian movement. In May 1965, the Israeli army attacked a number of settlements in the West Bank.
In the spring of 1967, Israeli forces launched a series of attacks on Syrian border settlements, while Israeli aviation attacked important targets on the Syrian front. These provocative actions were aimed at intimidating the Arab countries and forcing them to refuse to coordinate efforts in the struggle against imperialism and Zionism, as well as to undermine the progressive regime in Syria.
In an effort to prevent further deterioration of the situation, the Soviet Union warned Israel in April 1967 of heavy responsibility for its adventurous policies and urged it to show restraint and prudence. However, after that, the Israeli government did not change its course.
Given the current situation, the USSR at the end of May again tried to prevent a critical development of events. In a statement on the situation in the Middle East on 23 in May 1967, the Soviet government warned Israel that if it unleashed aggression, it would have to meet not only with the combined strength of the Arab countries, but also with decisive opposition from aggression by the Soviet Union, all peace-loving states.
Due to the fact that the Israeli government did not heed the warnings of the USSR and continued to prepare for the attack on Syria, Egypt was forced on 22 on May 1967 to ban the passage of the Israeli ships through the Tirana strait and the Gulf of Aqaba as well as vessels of other countries transporting strategic cargoes for Israel . At the same time, Egypt demanded the withdrawal of UN troops and transferred its own forces to the Sinai Peninsula to organize resistance to the aggressor ...
After the 1956 aggression of the year, Egypt significantly strengthened its defenses. With the help of the USSR and other socialist countries, its armed forces were re-equipped with new military equipment, ceasing purchases weapons at the imperialist monopolies.
In order to coordinate the military actions of the Arab states in the struggle against the aggressor, agreements were signed on joint defense with Syria (1966) and Jordan (1967).
In the second half of May, 1967, in the face of the increasing Israeli military provocations, Egypt began to strengthen its forces in the Sinai Peninsula, bringing their numbers to the beginning of the war to 100 thousand men (6 – 7 divisions) and to 1 thousand tanks. Egyptian troops were prepared for decisive offensive action, in the event that Israel embarked on aggression against Syria. From 29.05.1967, the Egyptian troops began to carry out the defensive plan "Winner".
5 June 1967 of the year, in 8: 45 Cairo time, the Israeli Air Force launched a surprise attack on 16 Egyptian airfields. To reach the target, Israeli aviation made a deep roundabout maneuver, going to the airfields of the Egyptian air forces from the sea. When the first wave hit the targets, the second wave of Israeli aviation was already in the air, and the third one was taking off from its bases. The break between the waves was 10 minutes. The air raid was provided by the suppression of radar stations, aviation guidance networks, air defense systems, and Egyptian armed forces ground control networks. As a result of the Israeli Air Force strike, 85% of Egyptian aircraft were destroyed.
At noon on the same day, Israeli aircraft attacked Syrian airfields and the Iraqi airfield H-3, destroying a significant number of aircraft on the ground.
In total, during the war, Israeli fighters and fighter-bombers made 3279 sorties attacking 28 Arab airfields, of which 97% of airfields were attacked on the first day of the war. After winning air supremacy in the first hours, the Israeli air force switched to supporting the ground forces.
The main blow Israeli troops inflicted on the coastal direction. On the first day, in most areas, the first-echelon troops of the Egyptian army successfully repulsed the Israeli offensive. By the end of the day, the Israelis managed to break through the defenses of the Egyptian troops on the directions of the main attacks, and by tank groups to advance a considerable distance into the depths of the Sinai Peninsula, intercept communications and disrupt the control of the Egyptian troops. The Primorsk group of Israeli troops, which included up to 300 tanks, blocked the Egyptian 7 division, which defended Rafah, by the end of 5 June reached the approaches to the railway hub and the main supply base of Egyptian troops. The Egyptian command was forced to give the order to the troops of the first echelon on the night of June 6 to withdraw to the defensive line of Jabal, Ljabni-Tamad. On the morning of June 6, Israeli forces occupied El-Arish and in the main areas, with the support of aviation, rapidly advanced to the second lane. In 12.00 6 June, Marshal Abd El-Hakim Amar ordered the troops defending in the El-Arish area to withdraw to the west bank of the Suez Canal, having only light weapons with them.
The same order was given to the divisions in Sinai. Front and army headquarters also began to retreat.
The chief of staff of the Egyptian army, Colonel-General Muhammad Fawzi wrote about this:
In the evening of June 7, Israeli troops reached the Suez Canal.
The Security Council twice decided on a cease-fire. However, Israel, blatantly flouting them, not only did not stop military operations against Arab countries, but also continued to seize new territories.
Israeli forces began fighting against Jordan in 13: 00 on June 5 after a powerful air strike. The offensive began on two fronts: the Jerusalem and Janeane-Nablus. In the direction of Jerusalem, with the support of aviation, three infantry, airborne and tank brigades launched an offensive. K 24: 00 Jerusalem was surrounded. The headquarters of the Jordanian army in the West Bank was subjected to an air strike. Fighting for the neighborhoods of the city continued at night. On the morning of June 6, the Israelis seized the Beit Aksar-An Nabi mountain range, Samovale, El Latrun, repulsing the attacks of Jordanian reserves advancing from Ariha. By June 7, in the southern sector, Israeli troops completely captured Jerusalem, Al-Khalil and developed the offensive to crossings over the Jordan River.
In the northern sector, Israeli forces launched an offensive on 12: 00 on June 5 after heavy aviation and artillery preparation. By the morning of June 6, two Israeli brigades surrounded the city of Jenin. An attempt by the 40 Tank Brigade of Jordan to break through to the city was not successful. The brigade was subjected to a powerful air strike and suffered heavy losses.
7 June Israeli units approached the city of Nablus. The local population welcomed the vanguard of the Israeli troops, taking them for Iraqi troops. In 10: 30, when the Israelis entered the city, the local population, realizing their mistake, began to resist the invaders. On the same day, in this direction, Israeli troops reached the Jordan River, seizing a bridge to Damia.
Thus, by June 7, the West Bank was fully occupied by Israeli forces. In 20: 00 7 June, Israel and Jordan agreed to a cease-fire.
12: 00 6 June, King of Jordan Hussein, after analyzing the situation, sent the following telegram to Nasser:
After consulting with the Egyptian Lieutenant-General Abd El Munim Riyad, who had arrived to lead the Jordan front, the king asked the Egyptian leadership to report on the three available options to resolve the situation.
1. The political decision on a cease-fire by the efforts of the United States, the USSR and the Security Council.
2. Evacuation of troops at night on the east coast.
3. A delay of one more day will lead to the Jordanian army being completely cut off and destroyed.
On 14: 00 6, June, Marshal Abd-El-Hakim Amer answered the following message by telegram:
5 June in 13: The Syrian government announced the start of the war. Air Force attacked 00 at Israeli airfields with 22 aircraft (there were no enemy aircraft at the airfields)(!).
In 14: 00, the Israeli Air Force struck back at four Syrian airfields, destroying 75% of aircraft. In the afternoon, the Syrian command attempted to force the Jordan River.
The advancement of troops to the initial areas for the forcing was carried out under the continuous strikes of Israeli aviation and artillery fire. Due to the heavy losses inflicted during the advance, on the afternoon of 6 in June, the Syrian troops abandoned the crossing of the water barrier and began to defend, concentrating their main efforts on the central front.
During 7 and 8 on June, the Israeli Air Force and artillery continued to strike at Syrian troops, and in 12: 30 and 9 on June, infantry and tank brigades launched an offensive. By the end of June 9, in the northern sector, Israeli troops, with the continued support of aviation, broke through the defenses of the Syrian troops and began to develop an offensive on Quneitra. The Syrian troops steadfastly held out against the superior forces of the enemy, inflicting heavy losses on manpower and equipment. In 15.00 10 Jun Kuneitra fell.
In the current critical situation, the Soviet Union, which had repeatedly warned the Israeli government about the disastrous consequences of its adventure, broke off diplomatic relations with Israel and declared its readiness to apply appropriate measures against the aggressor if he continued his aggressive actions. The firm Soviet position was one of the main factors that caused the Israeli government in 16: 30 10 June to cease hostilities.
As a result of the aggression, Israel captured an area of about 70 thousand square meters. km (the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, the Golan Heights) and as a first step towards the future annexation of the occupied lands established the system of Israeli occupation on them.
(Well, it was they who got a little hot. The New York Tribune newspaper ceased to exist a year before the events described, and little Israel could not overthrow such regimes under any victories.)
Now we will listen to the Arab officers.
This is an introduction to a very cool book-textbook “ARAB-ISRAELI WAR. Preparation for the Third Arab-Israeli Campaign ", released by the UAR military-scientific directorate immediately after the defeat in the Six-Day War. There, on two hundred pages, mobilization plans, operational deployment of the opposing sides, strategic operational plans, etc. are discussed in great detail. The advantages and disadvantages of the sides' armed forces are explained, errors are analyzed, etc. If you are interested, I’ll post several pdf files somewhere on the network.
There is no doubt that the 3 th “round” is not the last, since imperialism did not achieve its goals, and the Arabs retained enough strength and will for justice to triumph.
The thing is that the Zionist movement is imperialistic in its ideology, aggressive in its goals, racist in its content and fascist in its methods of action. And Israel is its obedient instrument in Palestine, the springboard of neo-colonialism and imperialism in its struggle to maintain influence in Africa and Asia.
That is why the Supreme OAU of the UAR and gives this analysis of the third "round" of the Arab-Israeli struggle in order to extract the necessary lessons, experience and benefits to better prepare for the upcoming decisive battle.
Lieutenant General Major
Abdel Mokeim Mohammed Riad Head of National University
NGSH AF SAR Mustafa Hassan El Gamal ".
9 June 1967, when the fire from both sides was stopped, ended the 70-year period of hard struggle of the Arabs against imperialism and Zionism. These 70 years can be divided into two periods. The first is from 29 August 1897, when the first Zionist congress was held in Switzerland, and until 29 November, 1947, when the Security Council adopted a resolution on the partition of Palestine. The second period - 20 years of continuous struggle of the Arabs against Israel. During this time, there were three rounds. In the first, in the summer of 1948, most of the countries, both Western and Eastern, were on the side of Israel.
In the second, autumn of 1956, Israel was only a weapon in the hands of two great powers and served to fulfill their imperialistic goals.
Then came the third "round", which is the subject of research in this book. Much of what happened during these 3 “rounds” deserves close attention, careful evaluation and analysis.
As much as the great powers and their minions tried to help Israel in the summer of 1948, by the fact that some of them even recognized its existence as a state even before Israel’s official request for this was sent to them, the whole world, both governments and peoples, condemned the imperialist threefold aggression, in which Israel took part in the summer of the year 1956. Relations in the military field developed in a similar way.
In 1948, the Western countries led by the United States and the socialist led by the USSR helped Israel with weapons, money, equipment, and volunteers.
And in the 1956 year, both the countries of the West and the countries of the socialist camp demanded a decisive cessation of aggression.
As for the third “round” in the summer of 1967, everything turned out differently. Interestingly, how carefully Israel conducted preparations for the war with the Arabs, how scrupulously it followed the fundamentals and principles of military science in each of these 3 “rounds”, how fully it mobilized all its material resources and moral strength and capabilities, so much did the Arabs neglect any preparation ignored the fundamentals and principles of military science, scattered their efforts and suffered unjustified losses.
“How could it happen that, contrary to any logic, 2,5 million Zionists defeat more than 100 million Arabs over and over again?
The victory was won by Israel, whose area is equal to 20 thousand km², while the Arabs had more than 11 million km², the military budget of Israel was 270 million dollars, and the budget of the Arab countries bordering with it was 6 million dollars. Incredibly, it’s a fact that Israel managed to move a well-trained and armed army into battle, mobilizing 830% of its population, while the six neighboring countries mobilized only 10% of its population for a decisive battle. But the constantly existing collusion and mutual support of the imperialist countries made possible the impossible from the impossible, and real from the unthinkable.
While the Arabs were busy with controversy in their midst, Israel made thorough and serious preparations for war. The Zionists paid due attention to the benefits of joint action and were not scrupulous in choosing the means to achieve their goals. Their slogan - all means are good if they lead to the desired result. The Arabs, all the time engaged in resolving the differences between them, in their actions adhered to generally accepted rules and regulations. And why be polite, listen to the voice of conscience and respect the one who does not have conscience, who is an apologist for war, who is mired in blood. "
The Arab warrior must do his utmost to best prepare for the decisive battle that will undoubtedly be. He should be well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the Israeli army, and know that statements about the invincibility of the Israeli army are just a myth, without foundation. Every warrior, wherever he is, must refer to the military chronicle of these three "rounds" and study it carefully.
These are the very warriors and their brothers, who in 1948 and 1956 showed fearlessness and heroism. The heroes of the 1948 and 1956 events can now ask their brothers: why the Arabs were so weak in the third round, why did they suffer such a crushing and shameful defeat, and what should be done to prepare well for the future battle, the new round?
Conditions on theater before the third Arab-Israeli campaign. In the 1967 year, Israel entered, experiencing serious internal difficulties: unemployment reigned in the country, foreign investment decreased, emigration increased, and the influx of Jews from abroad stopped. All this threatened the existence of Israel as a state and destroyed the myth of its prosperity. In his speech on 19 on April 1967, David Ben-Gurion sounded the alarm, saying that the future of the State of Israel could no longer be considered guaranteed.
(Indeed, at that time things did not go well in Israel, but by that time Ben-Gurion was already 81 for a year and he, practically not a lot, lived as a pensioner in his kibbutz.)
He was echoed by many other government and political figures. They demanded to create conditions for attracting new immigrants to Israel and “resettling them over a wide area” so that over time the Arab population would cease to be predominant. All of this prompted Israel to take urgent and decisive measures to enlist the support of imperialism and Zionism.
With the help of the imperialist forces, a plan was developed, designed not only to solve the problems facing Israel, but also to attract world public opinion to its side. This plan took into account the existence on the territory of Israel of the organization of Palestinian patriots "El Fatah" and its military wing "El Asif", which launched active activities at that time. On the other hand, imperialism sought to end the progressive Arab regimes in the area, and especially in Syria and the UAR. These countries, pursuing a peace-loving foreign policy, interfered with the implementation of the imperialist plans, actively supported the line expressed by the slogan "Arab oil - the Arabs." In addition, both of these countries have a common border with Israel. Major General Rabin, Chief of the General Staff of Israel, said on May 12 of the year 1967:
(Well, Rabin was still that swordsman! In the heat of the moment, he didn’t blurt out like that, but I didn’t find such words in any serious source.)
This statement addressed to Damascus should have touched and Cairo. Zionism and imperialism began to seriously plan their aggression against the Arabs at the beginning of 1967, activating the springs of the mechanism of secret maneuvers and open consultations both in the international arena and inside Israel. As a result, in April, Israel attempted aggression against Syria in order to overthrow the existing regime there, which was not crowned with success.
(The second time I have already met this statement, but I did not understand when and in what way the “attempt of aggression” manifested itself.)
At that time, Israel began preparations for wider aggression, accusing Syria of encouraging the actions of the Palestinian patriots and restoring world public opinion against it. Israel launched a wide-ranging psychological campaign against the Arabs on a global scale, demanding that all its ambassadors carry out the necessary work for this in the countries where they are accredited.
All Israeli parties within the country also joined this campaign, leading the people of Israel and world public opinion to the conclusion that future Israeli aggression is a just and inevitable matter.
The Soviet circles commented on all these actions of Israel and its incessant threats to the Arabs:
14 May The Israeli plan faced an obstacle when the UAR announced that it would take all the necessary measures to repel imperialist aggression against Syria.
For the imperialists and Israel, the intervention of the UAR was unexpected, despite the fact that they were aware of the existence of a mutual assistance agreement between Syria and the UAR, signed in November 1966, because they believed that Egypt had too many worries in Yemen and neither the ability to provide Syria with sufficient military assistance. All this led Israel and the imperialists from 14 May to 4 June to seek new methods and develop a new plan, details of which were revealed later.
Soviet historians conclusion:
(In other words, the Jews won, not because they fought well, but because the Arabs fought poorly.)
Well, dear readers, now you know almost everything about the Six-Day War. In order not to upset the readers who are militant towards Israel, I will not put here the "pro-Israel", "prejudiced" and "biased" version of the description of the military actions of the parties. I will add only a few numbers and strokes that complement the overall picture.
The decision to break off diplomatic relations with Israel in the USSR was taken on 10 June.
USSR Ambassador Dmitry Chuvakhin suddenly asked for an urgent audience with Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Even. In a shaky voice, the Soviet ambassador said:
- In light of the ongoing Israeli aggression against Arab countries, the USSR government decided to sever diplomatic relations with Israel.
Eban, I must give him the honor, replied very discreetly and reasonably:
- There are deep disagreements between our countries, but that is why relations should be strengthened, and not stopped.
“What your Excellency says is rational, but I was not sent here to discuss the rationality of our official statement.” I have arrived to announce the severance of diplomatic relations between our countries.
Saying these words, the Soviet ambassador suddenly burst into tears and ran out of the office. Even just froze - he never expected such a reaction.
After returning to Moscow, Dmitry Stepanovich Chuvakhin, recognized in the hearts of one of the perpetrators of the Arab defeat of the Israeli military, was never appointed to the post of ambassador. The results of the war were a great defeat for Soviet diplomacy, and someone had to be appointed guilty.
He died in 1997 year. My homeland sternly dealt with my diplomat: I did not find a single snapshot of this person on the Russian-language Internet. But in Israel he is remembered - for the hidden sympathy he had for the people of our country ...
But with the United States, Israel acquired some informal alliance that survived not only the hostility of the USSR, but even the USSR itself, which in those years seemed unthinkable. This union is still alive today.
In this war, 766 killed Israeli soldiers (Ben-Gurion had 777 soldiers and 26 civilians) and injured about 2500-3000 people, another 15 people were captured. Arab countries did not disclose their losses, but most historians believe that Egypt lost 15000 killed (Ben-Gurion has 11 500) and 5600 prisoners, Syria - before 500-600 killed and 700 wounded, Jordan, according to the Jordanian Prime Minister, lost 6094 people killed and missing.
Even by the most careful calculations, the Arab armies lost military equipment worth 1 billion dollars, and almost all of them were Soviet-made. According to various sources, for example, the Arab armies lost some tanks from 500 to 800. The aircraft were destroyed 469 (391 - on the ground, 75 - in aerial combat, 3 - shot down by anti-aircraft gunners), of which 23 Iraqi - a country that does not have a common border with Israel. Figures from researcher to researcher differ slightly, but they do not cause any particular disagreements.
The Israelites gathered on the battlefields some unthinkable number of trophies. Before 80,% of the Arab tanks were in a fully combat-ready state (100 tanks were captured in full serviceability and with unused ammunition and around 200 with minor damage) and served for many years in various forms in the IDF.
I do not venture to judge the world echo, but Soviet propaganda brought some scattered pieces of this whole story to the most unexpected angles of the Soviet language space.
Dayan and Eban became folk characters, helped by their strange sounding names for the Russian ear. This fact was registered by Venichka Yerofeev in his famous book "Moscow-Petushki". (I honestly wanted to quote, but obscene vocabulary is present there. Alas ...)
Reality intertwined with the legend. Apparently, the story of heroism, allegedly manifested by Moshe Dayan during the Great Patriotic War somewhere near Kiev, disappeared from Mikhail Weller’s light hand.
And a year after the events described, Alexander Galich wrote his unforgettable ballad "How Klim Petrovich spoke at a rally in defense of peace."
Sources:
Arab-Israeli wars. Arab look. 2008.
Gorbatov O., Cherkassky L. The struggle of the USSR for ensuring a lasting and just peace in the Middle East. M., 1980.
El Asli Bassam. Zionist army of aggression. Palestinian publishing house "Ard", 1979.
Preparing for the Third Arab-Israeli Campaign (Third Round) Military Science Management, 1967.
Shterenshis M. Israel. The history of the state. 2009.
Tenenbaum B. The Unsuspected Arab-Israeli War of 1956. 2011.
- Alexander Privalov
- Six Day War. Part of 1. Prelude
Six Day War. Part of 2. Diplomatic intrigue and military preparations
Information