Naval aviation received another repaired Tu-142MK

On Thursday PJSC Taganrog aviation scientific and technical complex named after G.M. Berieva ”(TANTK, a member of the UAC) handed over to the Naval Aviation the next overhaul of anti-submarine Tu-142MK with tail number“ 54 ”, reports press office corporations.

The updated aircraft received its own name "Vladimir Dubinsky" in honor of the first commander of the 76th separate anti-submarine aviation regiment of the North fleet. Colonel Vladimir Ivanovich Dubinsky - "Honored Military Pilot of the USSR."

“After passing all the necessary tests, the Tu-142MK was handed over to the naval aviation crew of the Red Banner Northern Fleet and successfully made a flight to its permanent home base,” the United Aircraft Corporation said in a release.

Tu-142 - Soviet and Russian long-range anti-submarine aircraft. The developer is Tupolev OKB. Produced from 1968 th to 1994 year. It is used for long-distance ocean intelligence, search and tracking of enemy targets. In total, about a hundred units of Tu-142 aircraft of various modifications were produced.

Comments

[Kaskad]

Near the Baltic, you need to fly low .. (this is necessary) to read the inscription on board "G.M. Beriev"! and in a circle with a roar ..

[Tiksi-3]

Quote: Kaskad

to read the inscription on board "G.M. Beriev"!

read an article?

[gig334]

Why is the sensation of making a sensation due to the modernization of the Soviet aircraft? Christmas trees survived.
Thanks to the USSR, its weapons still protect our peace and quiet. But you won’t cook porridge with a liberal business, they only know how to blame the USSR and boast of Soviet weapons. As I understand it, fifth-generation planes will be in service once, blah blah blah, and you can completely forget about atomic new warships, such as destroyers, cruisers and aircraft carriers (we’ll finish the diesel frigate Gorshkov for another ten years). You can also forget about the armament of the cartoons, the elections have passed. But the Kudrins are returning, why should we get rid of the fifth column.

[Serge Gorely]

Quote: gig334

Why is the sensation of making a sensation due to the modernization of the Soviet aircraft? Christmas trees survived.
Thanks to the USSR, its weapons still protect our peace and quiet. But you won’t cook porridge with a liberal business, they only know how to blame the USSR and boast of Soviet weapons. As I understand it, fifth-generation planes will be in service once, blah blah blah, and you can completely forget about atomic new warships, such as destroyers, cruisers and aircraft carriers (we’ll finish the diesel frigate Gorshkov for another ten years). You can also forget about the armament of the cartoons, the elections have passed. But the Kudrins are returning, why should we get rid of the fifth column.

But PAISING! The USA flies on the brand new B-52s, their aircraft carriers are all no older than 3 years old ... And we ... And we have ...

[faiver]

and how many of them have not B-52 but more recent aircraft? and how much we have ...

[vladasyar]

DO NOT throw in desa about newbies not older than 3 years old, learn the mat.

[cordon332]

Quote: Serge Gorely

Indeed PAISING! The USA flies on the brand new B-52s, their aircraft carriers are all no older than 3 years old ... And we ... And we have ...
Reply Quote

The last production B-52 was transferred to the US Army in 1962. Further only modernization.

[The Siberian barber]

Plus!
Affected grandfathers and fathers, not unlimited!
If, with destructive aircraft, more or less, it’s “understandable”, then with larger brothers, everything is foggy. I hope so far ..
Agree: it is somewhat sad to see the image of the "old bomb carrier" created in 50-60g. albeit modernized)

[bazzbazz]

How much was lost in perestroika ... Fortunately, Soviet military equipment has a large margin of safety and there are still aircraft left. Repair, modify and continue to use calmly!

[True]

Quote: bazzbazz

Fortunately, Soviet military equipment has a large margin of safety and there are still aircraft left. Repair, modify and continue to use calmly!

But doesn’t the king-gun fix / modify North Honduras? Aurora is idle, could come in handy in Syria .....

[bazzbazz]

Who are you anyway? Climb back where you came from. If you have jokes about Aurora, then not funny!

[True]

Quote: bazzbazz

If you have jokes about Aurora, then not funny!

Let's see whose comment gets more likes

[bazzbazz]

You are here for the likes) It is visible!

[vladasyar]

And from Aurora, do not you want?

[Rakti-kali]

Quote: True

Let's see whose comment gets more likes

Well, if they had not taken the minus, you, Svidomo skakuas, would have been driven into skulls for a long time.

[Vlad.by]

He still does not know about Tsar Bonbu!
Generally, my gums would be worn out in blood.

[Lucy]

bazzbazz (Maxim) is a direct holiday.
Are you a specialist in search, tracking, transfer of contact, destruction of submarines?
You saw the RSL-1,25,16 ... 60-70s of the development in disassembled form, and which capacitors are soldered into their email. base?
Probably modernize, not modify, but how? Do you know how many RSL on Orion, Poseidon, as opposed to> 200 pieces on the IL-38? That Korshun, Berkut were changed on Tu-142 ... All processes are automated, and the 1st navigator, like a louse on a comb with a pencil, does not spin around a piece of paper - man. tablet. After deep modernization of the Tu-142, the football team was reduced?

[Livonetc]

Quote: gig334

Why is the sensation of making a sensation due to the modernization of the Soviet aircraft? Christmas trees survived.
Thanks to the USSR, its weapons still protect our peace and quiet. But you won’t cook porridge with a liberal business, they only know how to blame the USSR and boast of Soviet weapons. As I understand it, fifth-generation planes will be in service sometime there, blah blah blah, and you can forget about nuclear new warships such as destroyers, cruisers and aircraft carriers. As about weapons from cartoons, the elections were held. But the Kudrins are returning, why should we get rid of the fifth column.

No one does.
Just an article on VO.
Maybe a trifle.
But all one is good.

[lance]

for antisubmarine most relish if everything has been updated including the engine and electronics

[igor67]

Quote: Lance

for antisubmarine most relish if everything has been updated including the engine and electronics

who will update the engine? Whoever doesn’t release it, the NK142MP 12 series are on 3, if the memory does not change, this engine is so new from its relatives NK12

[lance]

Of course, too lazy to look, but in the back 2-3 weeks from the Tu-142, Tu-95msm family were transferred to me with the NK 12mpm modern engine and the Av-60tm screw, which increased its range to us 1500km at full load.

[igor67]

Quote: Lance

Of course, too lazy to look, but in the back 2-3 weeks from the Tu-142, Tu-95msm family were transferred to me with the NK 12mpm modern engine and the Av-60tm screw, which increased its range to us 1500km at full load.

on AN22 there is an Nk12m2 series, but I don’t remember the exact length there, but it is much longer than on Tushki, there is power, the shorter the speed increases, other kerosene fuses can be put on the engine, maybe the fuel pump. you will not change, due to the fact that it is not produced.

[Ivan Tarava]

Are new anti-submarine aircraft being developed in Russia now?

[lance]

we only have the modern il-38 and tu-142 with the upgrade, they will be submariners for another 30 years, the main thing is to close them. Poseidons, after all, are not new.

[Ivan Tarava]

What about their operating costs?

[lance]

I think that all the same, the answer of India is the most accurate: they abandoned IL-38, having bought Poseidon. but the Tu142 without M is in operation, but after modernization, hovering in the air and the load can solve the issue in +.

[Kent0001]

The first good news. Good luck in heaven and earth! And the car and the crew of the Hunter for substrates and aircraft carriers !!!

[lopvlad]

Tu-142MK

still serve. Amerikosy despite grandmas still use aircraft produced in the early 50's.
Like it or not, the peak of military aviation production in the USA and the USSR (Russia) fell on the years of the Cold War.
The Americans have a huge number of aircraft, but the vast majority produced a maximum in the late 80s.
There are 22 modern F-195s and 35 F-71s.

[Lucy]

Quote: gig334

Why is the sensation of making a sensation due to the modernization of the Soviet aircraft? Christmas trees survived.

What is the upgrade? New RSL appeared for Tu, IL?