Military Review

In the US, told about the main advantages of the Su-57

67
The Drive experts reviewed and assessed the technical characteristics of the Su-5 Russian multi-role fighter 57, reports RIA News.




The authors noted "a balanced approach of the Sukhoi Design Bureau to the development of stealth technology," which allows reducing the visibility of the fighter. According to them, "Su-57 occupies an intermediate position between the American F / A-18E / F Super Hornet and the Chinese J-20."

The experts also drew attention to the complex radar with an active phased array antenna (AFAR) X-band, the elements of which are located not only in the nose of the Su-57, but also on the sides: “Such a station not only significantly increases the pilot’s situational awareness, but also position in relation to the aircraft of the enemy makes the fighter almost imperceptible. "

Separately mentioned optical-electronic radar detection system air targets.

This optic-electronic impact system was seen on several Su-57 models and, if it works as it is announced, it can have a big impact on protecting the aircraft against advanced homing missiles,
Says the article.

As the authors noted, “the reliability of the fighter gives a powerful chassis, which is indispensable when performing various unscheduled operations, and the three-dimensional system of deflection of the thrust vector greatly increases the maneuverability of the aircraft.”

This is the first time that a three-dimensional thrust vector deflection system is integrated into a fighter with stealth technology,
they write.

Experts were also struck by the intra-body placement of the missiles: “The Su-57 has several compartments for air-to-air and air-to-surface missiles.”

As a result, the authors came to the conclusion that a promising machine is a “clever combination of capabilities” and may well become a “skillful and very valuable fighter”.

Recall, the first flight of the Su-57 took place at the beginning of 2010, in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. The serial batch of 12 machines of the Russian Aerospace System of the Russian Federation should be received in 2019 year.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vard
    Vard 4 May 2018 10: 28
    +2
    As I understand it, the United States will buy the SU-57 ...
    1. bulvas
      bulvas 4 May 2018 10: 31
      +18
      Quote: Vard
      As I understand it, the United States will buy the SU-57 ...


      According to them, “Su-57 is intermediate between the American F / A-18E / F Super Hornet and the Chinese J-20.”


      Their main task is not to buy it from us.

      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter 4 May 2018 10: 36
        +3
        Vasya, hello! hi
        Quote: bulvas
        Their main task is not to buy it from us.

        These mattresses are already digging under the Indians, they want to get their Fu-35 into them. yes
        1. Kaskad
          Kaskad 4 May 2018 10: 50
          +2
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          These mattresses are already digging under the Indians, they want to suck in their Fu-35

          Yes, these things they now vtyuhivayut all and Israel is still flashing them .. Such money is huge!
          In the US, told about the main advantages of the Su-57
          Here much depends on the pilots, they are bold with us! The fighter is not bad, but you need to modify it (dear truth ..) Well, nothing, men are working on it.
          1. Thrall
            Thrall 4 May 2018 10: 54
            0
            And the article is actually very entertaining
            http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20434/no-the
            -su-57-isnt-junk-six-features-we-like-on-russias-
            new-fighter
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 4 May 2018 11: 09
              +2
              and planes flew over me now
              Parade rehearsal

              Bears are right above our house, the rest are on the sidelines, so, unfortunately, I did not see if the 57th was there ...


            2. Tusv
              Tusv 4 May 2018 11: 24
              +1
              Quote: Thrall
              And the article is actually very entertaining

              Same shnyaga, only cooler than banter. Free translation.:
              "In the international C-57 ranking card, be between the Super Hornet or Silent Eagle and the Chinese J-20, closer to the first than the last."
              This author does not even know that the Chinese are flying on our engines
              1. Zhelezyakin
                Zhelezyakin 4 May 2018 12: 15
                +2
                The article deals exclusively with stealth characteristics. Not a word about engines.
                I would handicap the Su-57 as something between an International Roadmap Super Hornet or Silent Eagle and China's J-20, with it being closer to the former than the latter. But once again, stealth is just one ingredient of a complex cocktail that makes up an advanced fighter's overall capabilities set and ability to survive in various combat situations.
                Moreover, the author, very objectively notes that invisibility is only one of the components that increase the ability of the aircraft to survive on the battlefield.
                1. Tusv
                  Tusv 4 May 2018 13: 12
                  0
                  Quote: Zhelezyakin
                  The article deals exclusively with stealth characteristics. Not a word about engines.

                  And stealth in the IR range is not Stealth?
                  Moreover, the author, very objectively notes that invisibility is only one of the components that increase the ability of the aircraft to survive on the battlefield.

                  I objectively notice that the author writes about the Su-35 hi
                  1. Zhelezyakin
                    Zhelezyakin 4 May 2018 14: 16
                    +1
                    Quote: Tusv

                    And stealth in the IR range is not Stealth?


                    Stealth
                    The program for creating the design and production technology of an aircraft invisible to radar systems. In 1988, Rockwell International Corp. and Northrop Corp. began ordering the Department of Defense, US, for the first batch of such aircraft. As a result of the F-117.

                    Quote: Tusv
                    I objectively notice that the author writes about the Su-35

                    For the sake of objectivity, the above article on Su 35 is not mentioned
                    hi
                    1. Tusv
                      Tusv 4 May 2018 18: 37
                      +2
                      Quote: Zhelezyakin
                      For the sake of objectivity, the above article on Su 35 is not mentioned

                      Well so I corrected .. What is the problem? J-20, can not surpass the glider Su - 57 in stealth, except in the imagination. PGOs are unmasked, and the absence of IR blanking elements in J -20 is completely absent. The housekeeper composed an article hi Everything that is described in this article is true for the Su-35, Therefore! Creative failed, the author is a short-sighted person
                      1. Zhelezyakin
                        Zhelezyakin 7 May 2018 10: 45
                        +1
                        I don’t even know how it relates to your remark ... You obviously didn’t understand why I quoted a description of the stealth technology, at least as the states understand it. IK there sideways ... And about the comparative EPR of the Su-57 and J-20, I personally do not presume to say anything. The values ​​of not a single machine are known for certain. There are only approximate, "advertising" values ​​and for them, the EPR of fifty dollars is no worse than that of the F-22 ...
                    2. Inok10
                      Inok10 4 May 2018 22: 04
                      +3
                      Quote: Zhelezyakin
                      Stealth
                      The program for creating the design and production technology of an aircraft invisible to radar systems. In 1988, Rockwell International Corp. and Northrop Corp. began ordering the Department of Defense, US, for the first batch of such aircraft. As a result of the F-117.

                      ... the author of the idea, professor Ufimtsev - the USSR ... played around, twisted, threw and forgot ... laughing ... there are no "invisible" aircraft ... there are improperly selected means of detection ... hi
                      1. Zhelezyakin
                        Zhelezyakin 7 May 2018 10: 36
                        +1
                        I agree with the conclusions of Ufimtsev, and I do not dispute his right to the idea ...
                        Only it's a little about that. "Stealth" (referred to in the article voiced above) - as the name of the technology, not Ufimtsev proposed. And I just gave a definition of this characteristic, and the fact that the infrared radiation of the engines is not considered in it.
                        For tediousness do not blame me ...
          2. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter 4 May 2018 10: 56
            +1
            Quote: Kaskad
            Yes, these things they now vtyuhivayut all

            That is yes. I mean that the Indians in the week said that they were looking in the direction of the Su-57, and not the Fu-35. Here is the propaganda of the United States and has intensified: it’s too painful a tidbit.
          3. LSA57
            LSA57 4 May 2018 11: 02
            +1
            Quote: Kaskad
            The fighter is not bad, but you need to modify it (dear truth ..)

            the most important thing is that they don’t do "And it will do so" (* C) like Vova’s from the cartoon smile
            1. Kaskad
              Kaskad 4 May 2018 12: 43
              +1
              Quote: LSA57
              Quote: Kaskad
              The fighter is not bad, but you need to modify it (dear truth ..)

              the most important thing is that they don’t do "And it will do so" (* C) like Vova’s from the cartoon smile

              We ourselves need such ones ..! Ahead of serious fights .. soldier
        2. bulvas
          bulvas 4 May 2018 11: 05
          +1
          Greetings, Pasha!
          hi

          merchants who turn anyone in their favor
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter 4 May 2018 11: 09
            +1
            Which merchants? They are hucksters, hucksters. lol
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 4 May 2018 11: 13
              +1
              Quote: bouncyhunter
              Which merchants? They are hucksters, hucksters. lol

              correct amendment
              hi
              1. bouncyhunter
                bouncyhunter 4 May 2018 11: 16
                0
                I do not mean to find fault with the word, but to reflect their essence mercantile. drinks
                1. bulvas
                  bulvas 4 May 2018 11: 25
                  +1
                  Quote: bouncyhunter
                  I do not mean to find fault with the word, but to reflect their essence mercantile. drinks

                  hi
                  drinks
        3. Wendigo
          Wendigo 4 May 2018 11: 07
          +2
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          they want to get them their Fu-35

          On f35, orders for 3k have long passed. Why would someone push it in if it was already lined up? hi
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter 4 May 2018 11: 11
            +2
            Existing orders did not cover development costs, here are mattresses and promote their miracle plane with all the lies.
            1. Wendigo
              Wendigo 4 May 2018 11: 31
              +1
              Quote: bouncyhunter
              Existing orders did not cover development costs

              Sound the amount of development and revenue from all ordered aircraft.
              I only warn, count and google, I can. hi
              1. bulvas
                bulvas 4 May 2018 11: 55
                +2
                Quote: Wendigo
                On f35, orders for 3k have long passed. Why would someone push it in if it was already lined up?



                Many orders do not happen
              2. bouncyhunter
                bouncyhunter 4 May 2018 12: 06
                +2
                Quote: Wendigo
                I only warn, count and google, I can.

                If you know how - google and consider: there are a lot of articles on this topic with both numbers and analytics for this program.
          2. SOF
            SOF 4 May 2018 11: 51
            +1
            Quote: Wendigo
            Why would someone push it in

            ...and "why"to us to ask these" smart "questions? Here at vtyuhivayuschih and ask ....
    2. gippernano
      gippernano 4 May 2018 11: 13
      0
      Quote: Vard
      As I understand it, the United States will buy the SU-57 ...

      On their wunderwaffle, only fight with the partisans. ((((
      Now everyone wants to see how Israel on these smart and beautiful F-35, S-300 Syrian will be wet. If something goes wrong ... then the Su-57, albeit with rugged export characteristics, will remain the only salvation from the Chinese.
  2. Dead duck
    Dead duck 4 May 2018 10: 29
    +7
    Su-57 is intermediate between the American F / A-18E / F Super Hornet and the Chinese J-20

    Then you can not read laughing
    And in the meantime:
    Pilots of US military aircraft from an air base in Djibouti (Africa) were injured by lasers aimed at them from a Chinese military base, CNN reports citing military sources

    http://anna-news.info/smi-na-samolety-vvs-ssha-by
    li-napravleny-lazery-s-territorii-bazy-knr /
    1. The Siberian barber
      The Siberian barber 4 May 2018 10: 37
      +1
      Also, the comparison amused! laughing
      And yet this: “reliability is provided to the fighter by a powerful chassis, which is indispensable when performing various unscheduled operations”
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 4 May 2018 10: 47
        +3
        Quote: The Siberian Barber
        And yet this: “reliability is provided to the fighter by a powerful chassis, which is indispensable when performing various unscheduled operations”

        Well, at kada, they’ll hit the irradrome; wassat
    2. askort154
      askort154 4 May 2018 10: 39
      +5
      Deadushka ...... affected by lasers, ...

      A few years ago, our punks dabbled in Chinese pointers, blinding pilots when landing (in Vnukovo, Rostov). After that, these signs were taken out of free sale.
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 4 May 2018 10: 49
        0
        Quote: askort154
        After which, these signs were taken out of free sale

        Yes, only this punks didn’t suffer am as far as I know, not one was caught. very sorry...
      2. Dead duck
        Dead duck 4 May 2018 10: 50
        +3
        Well, found something to compare request
        Pointers are still sold.
        Powerful Chinese were (and are) on the Internet, you can order without problems.
        1. LSA57
          LSA57 4 May 2018 11: 09
          +2
          Quote: Deadush
          Well, found something to compare request
          Pointers are still sold.
          Powerful Chinese were (and are) on the Internet, you can order without problems.

          not the topic.
          at one time had fun when they just went to the TVs with remote controls. they had a large radius. walked and clicked on the channels in the windows of the first floors. when it worked, when not, but the mat on the TV was a masterpiece laughing
    3. Vadivak
      Vadivak 4 May 2018 10: 49
      +5
      Quote: .....
      Su-57 is intermediate between the American F / A-18E / F Super Hornet and the Chinese J-20

      Would write between B-29 Superfortress and An-2
    4. Thrall
      Thrall 4 May 2018 10: 59
      +2
      Quote: Deadush
      Then you can not read

      This is only a comparison by invisibility level, nothing more.
      1. gippernano
        gippernano 4 May 2018 11: 30
        +3
        We have a whole STELS army with tanks and other equipment, it’s been fighting in the Donbas for 4 years, and no one has seen it yet. And they, with their child prodigy, rush like a chicken and an egg. Losers
    5. LSA57
      LSA57 4 May 2018 11: 04
      +3
      Quote: Deadush
      Then you can not read

      it seems the aftors themselves are "in an intermediate position"
      in men. between the legs
    6. gippernano
      gippernano 4 May 2018 11: 15
      +1
      Yes, their local sticks knock down, just the Pentagon does not like to advertise it.
    7. Felix99
      Felix99 4 May 2018 11: 16
      +2
      Before that, the US Embassy in Havana suffered from Cuban crickets
  3. Guru
    Guru 4 May 2018 10: 37
    +6
    Purely Russian approach. Installed only that really works and has a need.
    Americans say “Nothing personal” - Russians “Nothing more”
  4. milling machine
    milling machine 4 May 2018 10: 37
    +1
    I understand that The Drive is a car edition. And aviation experts are there with Gulkin ....
    The following laudatory news about Russian weapons will come from the "experts" of the playboy publication, etc.?
    1. 1vlad19
      1vlad19 4 May 2018 11: 08
      0
      From the Grand Tour.
  5. NEXUS
    NEXUS 4 May 2018 10: 40
    +4
    What will be the SU-57 in serial execution is still too early to say. About 57th know only those who develop and build it. All other opinions can only be speculations and conjectures. However, we can confidently say that the SU-57 is being built taking into account what the Raptor and the F-35 are, since in the event of conflicts in the future, it may very well be that our car will meet with mattress counterparts.
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 4 May 2018 10: 51
      +2
      Quote: NEXUS
      maybe in case of conflicts in the future, it may very well be that our car will meet with mattress vis-a-vis.

      so it seems we have no more fighting. in all cases, the weapon will be mattress against us
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 4 May 2018 10: 54
        +2
        Quote: LSA57
        so it seems we have no more fighting. in all cases, the weapon will be mattress against us

        And I’m talking not only about the fact that they will fight with us. Over time, the Su-57 will go for export and then it could very well meet the same F-35 in some conflict of third countries.
        1. LSA57
          LSA57 4 May 2018 11: 13
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          Over time, the Su-57 will go for export and then it could very well meet the same F-35 in some conflict of third countries.

          Sorry, do we need this? let them grounded.
          remember the war between Iraq and Iran? both of them fought with the weapons that the USSR supplied them. that's why it is not victorious smile
    2. gippernano
      gippernano 4 May 2018 11: 18
      +1
      These counterparts with the Su-35, categorically do not want to meet, and you say ......
  6. Yaro Polk
    Yaro Polk 4 May 2018 10: 41
    +5
    Ordinary Z-Envy, painfully beautiful turned out wassat
    1. Masya masya
      Masya masya 4 May 2018 11: 10
      +3
      Quote: Yaro Polk
      it turned out painfully beautiful

      wink
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 4 May 2018 10: 48
    +4
    When Americans talk about the advantages of our technology, praise some kind of weapons, I personally have the feeling that this is done specifically so that the American citizen, who was practically adapted to the start of a new war and moreover, quickly and victoriously understands that the United States can get otvetku and not weak. And if the average person begins to understand that his life will be in danger, then the militant arrogance flies from him quickly.
  8. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 4 May 2018 11: 07
    0
    Oddly enough, an exceptional analysis of our SU-57 made something exceptional.
  9. Wendigo
    Wendigo 4 May 2018 11: 09
    +2
    Quote: Vard
    As I understand it, the United States will buy a SU-57 from us

    I'm afraid that even we will not buy it from us.
    1. sabakina
      sabakina 4 May 2018 11: 37
      +1
      Quote: Wendigo
      Quote: Vard
      As I understand it, the United States will buy a SU-57 from us

      I'm afraid that even we will not buy it from us.

      "We" is the leader of the Yumba Tumba tribe named Yumba Tumba, who studied at the University of Patrice Lulumba?
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 4 May 2018 15: 04
        0
        Quote: sabakina
        Quote: Wendigo
        Quote: Vard
        As I understand it, the United States will buy a SU-57 from us

        I'm afraid that even we will not buy it from us.

        "We" is the leader of the Yumba Tumba tribe named Yumba Tumba, who studied at the University of Patrice Lulumba?

        studied? delirium is not taught.
        Hi hi smile
  10. Yodzakura
    Yodzakura 4 May 2018 11: 15
    0
    Well these flattering reviews are needed to knock out more money.
  11. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 4 May 2018 12: 37
    0
    Su-57 is optimized for aerial combat: gaining dominance in the air.
    It is right. Su-57 must be integrated into air defense, as its active part.
    Without such fighter-interceptors, missile defense is a waste of money.
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 4 May 2018 15: 08
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Without such fighter-interceptors, missile defense is a waste of money

      fso. all KB, all MO resigned.
      our Israeli experiment fsu pramblemu decided.
      we’ll hear how they beat neighbors with impunity.
  12. Hog
    Hog 4 May 2018 13: 54
    0
    Judging by the conclusions, experts are just finishing high school.
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 4 May 2018 15: 10
      0
      Quote: Hog
      Judging by the conclusions, experts are just finishing high school.

      type 2 + 2-2 =?
      answer
      0
      2
      4
      6
      8
      I have no idea
  13. Horst78
    Horst78 4 May 2018 15: 21
    0
    If we are praised we are strained comrades are strained
  14. Topotun
    Topotun 4 May 2018 16: 24
    +1
    How can I evaluate an airplane from photographs and video fragments? In order to understand whether it is good or bad, one or another technical system must be operated in the entire range of operating conditions. Well then, we can draw conclusions. In principle, the same can be said of the F-22, c F-35. How can one compare different aircraft systems without having accurate and reliable information about them? Time will tell (God forbid, of course).
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 4 May 2018 17: 02
      0
      Quote: Topotun
      How can one compare different aircraft systems without having accurate and reliable information about them?

      Oh, there is a customer, there is a fee. there will be a different fee, a comparison of 180 degrees will unfold
  15. _Jack_
    _Jack_ 5 May 2018 11: 33
    0
    I especially liked it -
    reliability fighter gives powerful chassis
    like, you need to say something good about the terrible Russian weapons, well, for example, the wheels are big and strong laughing
    1. Cossack 471
      Cossack 471 5 May 2018 22: 36
      0
      The Jewish point of view is especially valuable in this matter. since it is completely gleaned from mass misinformation.