Military Review

A new air defense control system has been developed in the Russian Federation.

48
For the first time, Russian videoconferencing systems tested an automated control system (ACS) for air defense systems with elements of artificial intelligence, according to News.




As the newspaper was told in the Ministry of Defense, pilot exercises are already being conducted using a new automated control system, in particular, in the spring of this year, “the system was tested on the basis of one of the anti-aircraft missile regiments of the 14 Army of the Air Force and Air Defense.” The novelty is planned to be transferred to the troops in 2018 year.

“Today, each anti-aircraft missile system and radar complex have their own control systems. Information from them is brought together at a command post of a regiment or division and analyzed by management officers. Now these data will be processed in real time using elements of artificial intelligence, ”the article says.

It is reported that the new ASU-Air Defense will automatically display a complete picture of the air situation. Targets are classified into single or group, their type, danger level, speed, altitude and direction of flight will be visible. The servicemen will receive a complete picture of the actions of the enemy and recommendations for their destruction.

According to the former head of the anti-aircraft missile forces, Lieutenant-General Alexander Gorkov, "in the modern concept of air defense, centralized control and automation are the main principles of its construction."

The new ACS will reduce the time to bring tasks, improve the accuracy of targeting. Diverse short-range, medium-range and long-range air defense forces will turn into one. The information collected in the automatic mode will be summarized as quickly as possible and transmitted to command posts. This is very important with modern aircraft speeds and high density of air attacks,
said Gorkov.
Photos used:
RIA News / Grigory Sysoev
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Proxima
    Proxima 3 May 2018 10: 13
    +9
    In Syria, to test this system. Two birds with one stone would be killed. For one, the NATO coalition in its own skin felt what modern air defense systems mean.
    1. bazzbazz
      bazzbazz 3 May 2018 10: 19
      +4
      There is still a mess! Yes, and they will not turn around in the normal way.
      And so the good news, work brothers!
      1. Wei
        Wei 3 May 2018 10: 28
        +1
        The new ACS will reduce the time for completing tasks, increase the accuracy of target designation. The heterogeneous air defense forces of short, medium and long range will become one

        Well, let them check it in Syria, and then we will scream cheers .. There is now the main confrontation of Russia with the "dark forces of the world"!
        1. venik
          venik 3 May 2018 10: 48
          +3
          Quote: Wei
          Well, let them check it in Syria, and then we will scream cheers ..

          ========
          There is hardly any sense in this. The Russian contingent (air defense) is represented by only a few S-400 and Pantsyr batteries - they are already well tied to each other (through the KP “four hundred”) ... And for the Syrians, it is “unnecessarily” so far, because only the same “Armor” can be compatible with it; well, it can be “Buki” (and there are not many of those and others). And the rest of the "old" ("Pechora", Squares "," Wasps "and" Vega ") with this system is clearly NOT COMPATIBLE - there the entire the instrument part must be changed!
          So, excuse me - your recommendations, I'm afraid UNPROPER!
          1. Romario_Argo
            Romario_Argo 3 May 2018 11: 17
            +2
            this system is called - ACS Foundationcompatible with all of our air defense systems. And the meaning (!) - in conjunction with the highest radar type Sky and SPRN, with the subsequent distribution of targets according to subordinate air defense systems, according to characteristics, danger, etc.
            * tracking up to 1000 goals, issuing a TS on 500
            * ACS Polyana - the last century
      2. Alex777
        Alex777 3 May 2018 10: 31
        +1
        And they will not turn around in the normal way.

        They’ll give, they won’t go anywhere. Only they will be more afraid. hi
    2. svp67
      svp67 3 May 2018 10: 26
      +2
      Quote: Proxima
      In Syria, to test this system.

      Especially if you place it on one of the A-50 ... I think that in this case we would get a more multi-functional aircraft
      1. helmi8
        helmi8 3 May 2018 10: 47
        +2
        Quote: svp67
        Especially if you place it on one of the A-50 ... I think that in this case we would get a more multi-functional aircraft

        Why is he on the A-50? Carry excess weight? A-50 long-range radar aircraft, not the CPSU. He does not need this ACS at all - he has different tasks.
        1. svp67
          svp67 3 May 2018 10: 54
          +2
          Quote: helmi8
          Why is he on the A-50?

          And then, that would not only be the ears and eyes, but the brain. Seeing further and more, this aircraft should direct air defense ...
          1. Topotun
            Topotun 3 May 2018 14: 59
            +1
            So he already dumps all the data on the OKP air defense. And in real time .....
          2. helmi8
            helmi8 3 May 2018 22: 33
            +1
            Quote: svp67
            this plane should be led by air defense

            Really? winked This is not a CPSU (air command post), but an early warning aircraft. It is not his task to command air defense. Is this simple truth clear? If you also put this ACS in the A-50, then I’m afraid Ruslan will not be enough.
      2. Mestny
        Mestny 3 May 2018 10: 51
        +1
        It is the experience gained in Syria that made it possible to bring such a system to mind.
      3. venik
        venik 3 May 2018 10: 54
        +3
        Quote: svp67
        Especially if you place it on one of the A-50 ... I think that in this case we would get a more multi-functional aircraft

        =======
        Well, actually the A-50 has completely different tasks: it is an AWACS with the subsequent transfer of information to the ground control center (including the one in question!) Or the guidance (target designation) of interceptor fighters .. .. So, let's not confuse "God's gift" with fried eggs !!
    3. max702
      max702 3 May 2018 10: 42
      0
      The only question is whether it is tested in Syria or not .... The probability of this is very high because the landfill is excellent, but most likely with a safety net in the form of proven solutions .. by itself they won’t tell about this today ..
  2. Simon
    Simon 3 May 2018 10: 13
    +2
    What, the Russian sky to the castle! Now no fly will fly good wink
  3. Oleg Kozlov
    Oleg Kozlov 3 May 2018 10: 14
    +2
    So what? Well developed a new system. We will rejoice when she shows herself in business. And it will show perfectly. In the meantime, it's just blah blah blah ...
    1. igorka357
      igorka357 3 May 2018 10: 26
      +3
      And how is it in the case when it repels a massive blow to our Motherland? No, if you please, the Soviet system has already shown you in the SAR what it is capable of, I think the Russian system will obviously not be worse!
    2. Zlat070
      Zlat070 3 May 2018 10: 28
      +4
      We will rejoice if she NEVER shows herself in action! Better on the exercises!
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 3 May 2018 11: 13
        0
        So I'm talking about the same thing, Michael .. hi
    3. Alex777
      Alex777 3 May 2018 10: 33
      +1
      No, it's not blah, blah, blah. Real people do a good job. hi
    4. venik
      venik 3 May 2018 10: 56
      0
      Quote: Oleg Kozlov
      We will rejoice when she shows herself in business. And it will show perfectly. In the meantime, it's just blah blah blah ...

      =======
      Listen to you, so generally, EVERYTHING in Syria not tested (and successfully!) - so this is "blah blah blah" .....
  4. flicker
    flicker 3 May 2018 10: 14
    0
    It’s good, while someone scares the world with tons of disks and folders, we are improving the air defense system.
  5. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 3 May 2018 10: 19
    +3
    What the Bolsheviks have been talking for so long has come to pass! Uya, comrades! ..... soldier
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 3 May 2018 10: 21
      +3
      I really hope that they will not be delayed with testing and serial production. Such an ACS is needed.
      1. Pete mitchell
        Pete mitchell 3 May 2018 14: 01
        +2
        Pasha, removed from the tongue, honestly.
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        I really hope that they will not be delayed with testing and serial production. Such an ACS is needed.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 3 May 2018 14: 02
          0
          So not only you and I think so ... yes
  6. Rostislav
    Rostislav 3 May 2018 10: 25
    +1
    Syria today, among other things, is a testing ground for various weapons systems. The first thought is to run this ACS there.
    1. Vita vko
      Vita vko 3 May 2018 10: 48
      0
      Quote: Rostislav
      The first thought - there would run this ACS

      The quality of information in ACS cannot be higher than the quality of information of primary sources - this is an axiom for any means of information processing. And in Syria, the primary sources are radars which are 30 to 40 years old. There is of course a small exception, this is the statistical processing of information and work with intelligent neuro-decision support systems, but this “joy” requires high reliability and noise immunity. Otherwise, it will be like with “Donald Cook” in the Black Sea.
    2. venik
      venik 3 May 2018 11: 01
      0
      Quote: Rostislav
      Syria today, among other things, is a testing ground for various weapons systems. The first thought is to run this ACS there.

      ======
      It is ABSOLUTELY useless there (in any case, while it is useless!). Already explained why (see comment above).
  7. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 3 May 2018 10: 28
    +1
    "The Russian VKS first tested an automated control system
    (ACS) air defense systems with elements of artificial intelligence "////

    Good Luck! good
    1. venik
      venik 3 May 2018 13: 29
      +1
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Russian VKS first tested an automated control system

      =======
      Well, about the FIRST TIME we tested the ACS - you either "misunderstood" or "viciously you ride "!
      But the "system" of such a level - Yes! For the first time!!!
    2. onega67
      onega67 3 May 2018 14: 05
      0
      Warrior, are you for us or against us?
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 3 May 2018 14: 13
        +1
        I sincerely was surprised that similar systems in Russian
        There are no air defense, despite the good hardware itself (missiles).
        How much can I sit on the walkie-talkies and the phone?
  8. Egorovich
    Egorovich 3 May 2018 10: 28
    +4
    Someone with smart missiles themselves deserting to Moscow, but not all. And now, with the air defense system being developed by Russia, there will be a 100% death rate.
    1. venik
      venik 3 May 2018 11: 11
      +2
      Quote: Egorovich
      Someone with smart missiles themselves deserting to Moscow, but not all.

      ======
      In!!! good
      And I wondered where the American "hatchets" disappear? The first time they "fired" in Syria - 32 "hatchets" disappeared in an "unknown direction" .... The second time they fired - 22 were hit, 46 were shot down, and where else were 37 gone ?? It was seen by the “Russian hackers” using “artificial intelligence” they were “turned over”, and they flew to a secret training ground near Moscow, where they landed and “surrendered to the authorities”. And now they are under contract service in the RF Armed Forces smile
      Well, if without jokes, then for Russia, with its gigantic expanses, such a system is LIFELY necessary - the air defense system is too complicated !!!
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 3 May 2018 14: 10
        0
        "But I wondered where the American" hatchets "disappear?" ////

        They disappear — from the air defense’s field of view (they didn’t see it, which means it wasn’t) - precisely because such airspace monitoring systems
        in Syria are not yet available. If they had - they would have seen all the missiles.
  9. Abram
    Abram 3 May 2018 10: 28
    0
    "artificial intelligence? - when its not enough? hahaaha!" Regarding Western AI, this joke went well winked
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 3 May 2018 10: 54
      -1
      And then what - is it already "west"? Have they already won?
      Any joke goes well at the enemy.
      Try to joke about us here.
  10. Tektor
    Tektor 3 May 2018 10: 35
    +1
    As they say, a system is a system, but don’t be a bad guy. The "partner" knows that it is, and will act on the basis of its presence. Therefore, you always need to have reserve camouflaged positions with equipment of different generations ...
    1. Tilkus75
      Tilkus75 4 May 2018 11: 17
      0
      correctly! raise 100 500 balloons with a net!)))
  11. mvg
    mvg 3 May 2018 10: 37
    0
    One of the few developments that is really needed, unlike the flying "nuclear suitcase"
  12. Guru
    Guru 3 May 2018 10: 54
    0
    The new ACS will reduce the time for completing tasks, increase the accuracy of target designation. The heterogeneous air defense forces of short, medium and long range will become one.

    The good news is that something like this has long been necessary.
  13. Guru
    Guru 3 May 2018 10: 59
    +2
    Quote: Abram
    "artificial intelligence? - when its not enough? hahaaha!" Regarding Western AI, this joke went well winked

    The man decide on the terminology, for you Artificial Intelligence is what? I will explain the simplest AI - this is any ACS, the only question is the complexity and amount of information. laughing
  14. keeper03
    keeper03 3 May 2018 11: 31
    0
    Finally ! good This is what we have been striving for from the very beginning! Well now, hold on to the adversaries, there will be no mercy !!! wassat angry soldier
  15. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 3 May 2018 11: 52
    0
    Intelligent companies work. Well done Shoigu!
  16. Zomanus
    Zomanus 3 May 2018 12: 01
    0
    And tablet players still remain or are no longer necessarily pens on
    7 That always killed, to be honest.
    1. venik
      venik 3 May 2018 13: 18
      0
      Quote: Zomanus
      And tablet players still remain, or it’s not necessary to draw pens on glass7 This always killed, to be honest.

      ==========
      Well, my friend, is that WHEN it was ???
      I also happened to serve at the "station" with LAMP "element base" .....
      Our stations already a long time ago not in service ....
  17. gregor6549
    gregor6549 3 May 2018 14: 53
    0
    I did not see anything new in the message. The development of automated control systems by the Air Defense Forces of the Country and the Air Defense Forces of the Dry Forces began at the beginning of the 50x and did not stop, even in the troubled 90s. As a result, a whole series of automated control systems was created by units, formations and unions of air defense forces at the most razlichny level (from the KP of the radar company to the KP of the Air Defense Front and the air defense districts).
    More information about the air defense control system of the country on the website http://www.vko.ru/oruzhie/mezha-niva-fundament. About the history of ASU anti-aircraft defense system, information is quite interesting. Information is on the site http://mil.ru/files/files/pvo100/page79099.html.
    What am I doing? And to the fact that nothing fundamentally new in the field of air defense control systems has yet been observed. There is a systematic development of these systems, replacement of their elemental base, improvement of operational characteristics, etc. There are also enough problems, as before. This is a relatively low level of unification and standardization of individual ACS elements, and the problems of ensuring the production of modern components, and the stability of the systems in the conditions of the enemy using modern electronic warfare methods and tools, and the difficulty in training qualified personnel, and much more.
    The collapse of the Soviet Union, when many research institutes, design bureaus and industries focused on creating such systems ended up outside of Russia, had a huge negative impact on the development of air defense control systems. Nevertheless, not “everything was lost” and the process of improving the air defense control system and saturation of the RF Armed Forces with them continues.
    About DLO aircraft and A50. This aircraft is intended not only for the early radar detection of air, ground and surface targets, but also for controlling the actions of air defense aviation against the detected and accompanied targets. This aircraft, by the way, is an organic element of the air defense control system with which it interacts in the process of performing a combat mission.
    About handwritten tablets. Such tablets are still stored on some KP and PU included in the ACS as the "last reserve" in case of failure or destruction of ACS elements providing automation of control processes.
    About the need to test air defense control systems in Syria. I believe that tests of the individual components of air defense control systems corresponding to the airborne forces in Syria are carried out there, because deploying such a grouping there without modern complexes of automation tools simply did not make sense.
    Again, to conduct full-scale tests of the ACS as everything else in those conditions is sometimes impossible and sometimes I don’t want to get involved in a big brawl without risk.
    And the last one. The effectiveness of the Syrian air defense systems during the recent attack by cruise and other missiles on Syrian targets about which the media write with such reverence is, to put it mildly, greatly exaggerated. Well, the former Soviet and already obsolete air defense systems are incapable, which are in the arsenal of the Syrian Army to effectively deal with low-flying and maneuvering ax-type targets with a very low EPR, although individual single intercepts can be successful. These systems, however, did not differ in high efficiency when firing at more visible targets such as the Israeli F16 and F15 Yes, and according to many foreign experts, these systems "woke up" after the raid and shot into the white light like a pretty penny. And the air defense systems of the Russian Aerospace Forces were simply silent. There is already a big policy, the details of which are little known or unknown to us.
    In general, the story is very reminiscent of the story with a certain destroyer “Cook”, which some “Khibiny” of the SU24 aircraft allegedly scared to death.