Military Review

Russia's instant global strike

151
American "independent" analysts constantly come up with scenarios of preventive sudden global missile strikes by the United States on Russia in order to disarm the "aggressor" that Russia has already assigned them, in the interests of the national security of the United States and the West as a whole. Moreover, Russia was appointed the “aggressor” by many Western officials and the world media, Joe Biden even stated that “Russia is brazenly storming the foundations of Western democracy,” so the Western’s sudden global strike on Russia is justified, legitimized.




Recent ones news from the “analytical front”: a certain Dan Plash, in The Conversation, reports that “discussions about a possible new world war have reached their apogee.” “Probably, American leaders believe that they are able to eliminate Russia's nuclear potential with a powerful blow from the usual weapons with the support of missile defense. The goal is to hit any target on earth in 60 minutes. To destroy Russian nuclear missiles before their launch, the United States needs to silence the radar, possibly cyber attack, destroy 200 stationary and 200 mobile missiles, a dozen Russian submarines and strategic bombers. Scott Sagan of Stanford University reported the results of a sociological survey: "Americans will not oppose the preventive use of weapons, even nuclear ones, provided that the United States itself will not suffer."

Given this development of our relations with the West, can Russia deliver a preventive global disarming strike on the West? The Russian military doctrine does not provide for this, so this question is not being considered by our experts, our officials and the media do not glue the labels of the “aggressor” to the West, just mentioning the “aggressive policy” of some Western countries. However, “independent” observers can actually fantasize about this topic, or do we have less freedom than in the West?

So, the West, led by the United States, is conducting psychological preparation of its public opinion for a war with Russia, the military infrastructure of the United States and NATO is moving towards the borders of Russia, Western experts are talking about a preventive disarming strike on Russia, this is a fact. From this we can conclude that the attack of the United States and its satellites is almost inevitable, as soon as the United States deems that this is an opportune moment. Then should Russia wait for the weather by the sea? To whom do we play the nobility?

In light of this situation, Russia needs to prepare for a defensive war, and strive to take advantageous positions in future clashes with the US and NATO, in fact, just as the USSR did on the eve of the inevitable, if only for ideological reasons, war with Nazi Germany. That is, Russia should strive to push the military infrastructure of the United States and NATO as far as possible from its borders. What, in fact, Russia is doing in the Donbas, in the Crimea and in Syria, is putting out its advanced outposts there, not allowing the US to make these regions its military springboards, breaking the NATO military ring around Russia.

The operation of the Russian Aerospace Force in Syria gave Russia two bases on the shores of the Mediterranean, with which we broke through the NATO front in Turkey. The Syrian bases of Russia embrace NATO from the south-east, Russia begins to surround NATO itself - this is the strategic importance of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Force in Syria. Under attack, the US Navy is in the eastern Mediterranean, and he is deprived of the opportunity to attack Russia with missiles from the Mediterranean.

In turn, the Syrian operation was impossible without the reunification of the Crimea, because otherwise the Americans stationed their military base there, and Joe Biden told about such plans after they were frustrated in the 2014 year. The American base in the Crimea blocked the Black Sea Fleet in Novorossiysk, and threatened from the Crimea with rocket attacks throughout the south of Russia. Russian military supplies to Syria from Novorossiysk could also be blocked.

The US policy, starting with the dismemberment of Yugoslavia, says that they adhere to the strategy of constant guided provocations, or "controlled chaos", which is gradually moving towards the borders of Russia, Bandera's coup in Ukraine and pro-Western coup attempts are in their turn terrorists in syria. Apparently, this strategy will continue, but where and how?

Political analyst Dmitry Evstafiev in the program of Vladimir Solovyov suggested that the next step is to destabilize the United States of the Baltic region. Indirect evidence of such a turn of events is already too much, and the British press was suddenly excited: it began to go out with headlines that in 2018, Russia could seize the Baltic republics. Nonsense? But why is she being thrown?

If someone aims to make it impossible in principle to build a gas pipeline of the joint venture - 2, and to stop the operation of the joint venture-1, then for this it is necessary to destabilize the Baltic region. This can be done according to the Bandera scenario: to bring local neo-Nazis to power in the Baltics, in order then to bring down the repression on the Russian-speaking population, and in general, everyone who does not express hostility towards Russia. As it happens in Ukraine.

For this, it is necessary to nascent the Baltic states, as it happened in post-Soviet Ukraine. This is exactly what we see today in the Baltic States, where the Russian-speaking population is affected in their rights, in Latvia, contrary to European values, Russian schools are being closed, and local Nazis openly march in all Baltic republics.

The West did not notice and does not notice the persecution of the Russian-speaking population in Bandera’s Ukraine, nor will it notice repressions in the Baltics. Silent - it means support. Practically a foregone conclusion: Russian schools in Latvia will be closed, despite the fact that this clearly contradicts the official position of Brussels - he will keep silent again, because the word of the American ambassador is much more weighty. How to respond to all this Russia?

In general, all the recent provocations of the West, from the Bandera in Ukraine to the “Russian hacker attacks” and the “Skripaley case”, are all possible casus belli, reasons for war, and Russia itself can use one of them. If the United States again “changes regime” somewhere or launches a missile attack, Russia can also strike somewhere, especially if our military or Russian-speaking population is affected. With another American provocation, Russia can deliver a global disarming strike in Ukraine, in the Baltic States, or in Syria.

The local offensive operation of Russia in Europe for the destruction of US missile defense bases is strategically justified: they really threaten the security of Russia. That is, the primary targets of the Russian global non-nuclear strike can be the bases of the forward position of the US missile defense system, which are close to the Russian borders in Romania and Poland.

The reason for such an operation of Russia can serve as the destabilization of the Baltic states, where the US can organize both a “regime change” on the overtly nationalist and resonant actions of the “Russian terrorists”, with an instant broadcast of these events in the world media, as they repeatedly faked it in Syria, the last time in East Guta. The goal of this global provocation could be the destabilization of the region according to the Ukrainian scenario and the creation of an excuse for the deployment of US air defense and missile defense systems on its territory. The Baltic states are part of NATO, in contrast to Ukraine.

The US missile defense bases in the Baltic States, as well as in Ukraine, are absolutely unacceptable for Russia, since they can be used for firing cruise missiles - this threat may be the reason for a crisis similar to the Caribbean one. Recall, then the Americans placed their missiles in Turkey, now they have already deployed a missile defense system in Romania, are completing the deployment of a missile defense system in Poland, and can continue this strategy in the Baltic States, as well as in Ukraine.

To neutralize advanced American weapons systems advanced to our borders, when the United States refuses to discuss this issue, Russia can go on a global disarming attack on the US missile defense base areas if the situation escalates further as these missile defense bases become too dangerous. This risk is justified: anyway, war with the Americans seems inevitable. But with this global blow, Russia will remove the immediate military threat on its borders.

Will the US risk its own security by attacking Russian territory in return? Most likely not, because for Trump and his like-minded "America first", and not distant colonies near the borders of Russia. In addition, the missile defense potential for a first strike on Russia at close range will be destroyed.
Author:
151 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 4 May 2018 05: 25
    +22
    the West’s global blow to Russia is already justified,
    our "partners" have been planning these attacks since 1945! And only the risk of getting an answer holds them back. But it can "close" in the head of a partner and .... away we go!
    1. 210ox
      210ox 4 May 2018 06: 23
      +28
      Vladimir, there is a certain BUT! Yes, they are planning. But in the first place they put a very relevant moment for them now ... Why take the risk? When can I bribe, tighten the economic noose, bring Gorbachev 2.0 to power ....
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      the West’s global blow to Russia is already justified,
      our "partners" have been planning these attacks since 1945! And only the risk of getting an answer holds them back. But it can "close" in the head of a partner and .... away we go!
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 4 May 2018 06: 36
        +10
        There is a hybrid war
        Hybrid warfare!
        1. Semen1972
          Semen1972 4 May 2018 13: 43
          +9
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          There is a hybrid war
          Hybrid warfare!

          And people are dying completely not hybrid ... Pilots yesterday ... A real war is going on.
      2. Victor Kamenev
        4 May 2018 09: 36
        +10
        Instead of Gorbachev, 2.0, Putin has already arrived, so your script is already in the basket of history. Bribe and strangle trying to 2000 year, so what? Russia created the CD on nuclear engines. And in general, Putin and his team are not the CPSU politburo, which gave birth to Gorbachev. Conclusions are made - all oligarchs are equidistant ...
        1. akunin
          akunin 4 May 2018 10: 44
          +25
          especially such "peasants" as Rogozin, Serdyukov (directly related to the state defense order) Dvorkovich, sand and the like - the polit bureau is resting.
        2. Alber
          Alber 4 May 2018 15: 17
          +5
          Quote: Victor Kamenev
          Conclusions are made - all oligarchs are equidistant ...

          Equidistant - this is a measure somewhat ephemeral.
          Neutralized, neutralized, so that they could not harm Russia with their actions and the money withdrawn in the state’s income is probably preferable for the country.
          Or, "liquidated", again with the return of money stolen from the people
        3. true_rover
          true_rover 4 May 2018 17: 53
          +13
          Gorbachev and Putin are different rulers and there is no need to even compare them. The marked one began the collapse of the Great Country (EBN finished), and Our real Supreme country revives (in spite of the liberals)
        4. Tomato
          Tomato 4 May 2018 22: 08
          +15
          Totally agree with you. Around Putin, a real team of patriots: Sechin, Miller, Chubais, Rotenberg, Timchenko. And the greatest specialist in the military-industrial complex is Rogozin.
          Nuclear-powered cruise missiles have already been adopted and are well mastered.
          The yachts of Abramovich, Sechin, Patriarch Kirill and Deripaska, with the "Caliber" on board, are constantly being kept at the sight of the NATO base.
          And by the way. If during the Soviet Union tanks stood on the Oder, in the center of Europe, now they have advanced much west, almost at the English Channel. I heard France is already asking for the Warsaw Pact. In short, the geopolitical position has significantly strengthened.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 4 May 2018 22: 18
            +3
            Quote: Tomatoes
            If during the USSR tanks stood on the Oder, in the center of Europe, now they have moved much more west, almost at the English Channel

            You have hallucinations.
            By the way-is this, of course, Putin took the tanks of the USSR (GYYY) from the Oder to a clean field?
            Quote: Tomatoes
            In short, the geopolitical position has significantly strengthened

            It depends on what you compare it to. If with the USSR (plus CMEA, plus ATS) - naturally, no. If with the consequences of "taxiing" of the Labeled - EBN - then, of course, yes.
            Everything is known in comparison (c). Did not know? I give love
          2. SETTGF
            SETTGF 5 May 2018 04: 03
            +2
            Tomatoes, a liberal Latvian schoolboy! I’m not tired of writing and trolling your stupidities regarding Russian policy! You probably made a mistake with the site ?!
        5. dSK
          dSK 4 May 2018 22: 37
          +3
          Russia may take a global disarming strike on US missile defense areas
          A very tempting offer, who will be for?
      3. Nick
        Nick 7 May 2018 09: 24
        0
        Quote: 210ox
        . Why take a chance? When you can bribe, tighten an economic noose, bring to power "Gorbachev 2.0" ...

        For the next six years this problem has been put aside, and further uncertainty. It would be nice in the next six years to change the socio-political formation in Russia so that the Gorbachev / Yeltsin 2 scenario could not be repeated
    2. Alekseev
      Alekseev 4 May 2018 07: 28
      +13
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      our "partners" have been planning these attacks since 1945! And only the risk of getting an answer holds them back.

      That's right!
      And the article somewhat naively presents the task of the “partners” in the destruction of nuclear deterrence forces: they say that the Americans need only destroy the WTO and missile defense with a couple of hundred ballistic missile systems and several strategic submarines and carrier aircraft. And what about tactical and operational-tactical nuclear munitions, cruise missiles, and even more so, new means of destruction voiced by Putin the other day?
      Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by nuclear bombs in power just falling into this category.
      So, the "partners" have a desire to destroy Russia. There is no chance of avoiding self-destruction.
      Look how fat Kim scared the United States and vassals with his incomparable Russian nuclear missile potential, even they are ready to kiss him right away (Ukrainian.) wink having forgotten that he is a dictator, a bulwark, a bastard, etc.
      As for cyber attacks, it is not clear what the author means: after all, the Strategic Missile Forces and other nuclear deterrence forces are not controlled via the Internet. Networks, you see, isn’t there for cyber attacks. request
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      Why take the risk? When you can bribe, tighten the economic noose, bring "Gorbachev 2.0" to power ...

      And here it all depends on us. Now is not the post-war years of the 20th century, materiel, goods are produced not only, and not so much in the USA and their satellites.
      We need to abandon the illusions of equal participation in the global dollar economy and rely mainly on our own market, develop the processing of metals and all our raw materials wealth and introduce foreign trade based on the gold ruble and national currencies such as the yuan, for example.
      1. Victor Kamenev
        4 May 2018 09: 39
        +2
        The specific scenario of the American global strike, which one is, claims to its authors, is given.
        1. dzuar saubarag
          dzuar saubarag 5 May 2018 14: 54
          0
          I remember this concept also provided for the defeat of various structures: power plants, railway junctions, dams .... In general, everything that can make our answer as difficult as possible and demoralize the population.
      2. Olgovich
        Olgovich 4 May 2018 09: 52
        +11
        Quote: Alekseev
        And the article somewhat naively presents the task of the “partners” in the destruction of nuclear deterrence forces: they say that the Americans need only destroy the WTO and missile defense with a couple of hundred ballistic missile systems and several strategic submarines and carrier aircraft.

        You are right, but the main message of the article, nevertheless, is different: about the possibility of delivering a preemptive strike precisely by RUSSIA.
        And here I wouldn’t refuse this thought in general: the whole history of many brutal attacks on our country of the West and unheard of losses incurred because of this, gave Russia the right to answer in advance. First one. Of course, if there is already a very, very edge and it will be clear that a blow to Russia is inevitable.
        As all veterans of the Second World War said: June 22, the 41st never again should not be repeated!
        1. Antares
          Antares 4 May 2018 20: 59
          0
          Quote: Olgovich
          gave Russia the right to answer in advance. First one. Of course, if there is already a very, very edge and it will be clear that a blow to Russia is inevitable.

          Historically, whoever attacks first loses coalitions.
          And the one who was attacked was provided with alliance, help, etc.
          Russia / USSR won global wars only in alliance with the largest / strongest (with England, for example, the USA.
          Hitting the USSR first would have lost. No help would be, on the contrary.
          So delivering a preventive strike, get ready for complete isolation.
          1. Balagan
            Balagan 5 May 2018 01: 17
            +1
            And the CER in 1929?
            300 thousand Chinese on the one hand and 16 thousand Red Army on the other. Stalin's preemptive strike and the enemy are defeated.
          2. Olgovich
            Olgovich 5 May 2018 13: 52
            +1
            Quote: Antares
            Historically, who attacks first losing the coalition.
            And the one who was attacked was provided with alliance, help, etc.
            What nonsense? Napoleon how many wars won, and alone and against coalitions? What about the Prussians? What about the Romans? And the francs? England? Etc.
            As for coalitions: in WWII and WWII, coalitions fought on both sides.

            Quote: Antares
            Russia / USSR won global wars only in alliance with the largest / strongest (with England, for example, the USA.

            Nonsense: the Turks, the bastards and the Swedes were beaten alone. And they built the largest country.
            Quote: Antares
            Hitting the USSR first would have lost. No help would be, on the contrary.
            So delivering a preventive strike, get ready for complete isolation.

            The United States will not. And England, too. Who will isolate? recourse
          3. 11 black
            11 black 5 May 2018 20: 50
            +1
            Quote: Antares
            Russia / USSR won global wars only in alliance with the largest / strongest (with England, for example, the USA.

            Disagree - Napoleon, the Ottoman Empire ... many examples in earlier history.
          4. The comment was deleted.
          5. Senior manager
            Senior manager 9 May 2018 22: 56
            0
            Quote: Antares
            Hitting the USSR first would have lost.

            The USSR’s first strike — the Second World War — would not have begun; the loss of the Wehrmacht’s forces ready for an attack would have greatly cooled Hitler’s offensive impulse. There were no plans to capture Europe from I. Stalin. In this case, hostilities would be fought on the border and there is no need for allies to have a mob. whole resources, industry working - you can fight back. Here is such an assumption.
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 5 May 2018 10: 05
          0
          "June 22, the 41st should never happen again!" But if it happens again, everything will end in one day and the victims will be hundreds of millions of people.
          1. Olgovich
            Olgovich 5 May 2018 13: 53
            +2
            Quote: Vadim237
            "June 22, the 41st should never happen again!" But if it happens again, everything will end in one day and the victims will be hundreds of millions of people.

            Let it begin, this time, not with us, but with them.
            We have the right!
            1. 11 black
              11 black 5 May 2018 20: 52
              0
              Quote: Olgovich
              Let it begin, this time, not with us, but with them.
              We have the right!

              What difference does it begin at one (khan of the first) - end at the second (khan of the second) ... who will win in such a war - cockroaches? laughing
              1. Olgovich
                Olgovich 6 May 2018 06: 57
                0
                Quote: 11 black
                What difference does it begin at one (khan of the first) - end at the second (khan of the second) ... who will win in such a war - cockroaches?

                How is that? Obviously fewer missiles will arrive from that side. And Russia is much bigger than the USA,
              2. tun5t
                tun5t 6 May 2018 19: 24
                0
                What difference does it begin at one (khan of the first) - end at the second (khan of the second) ... who will win in such a war - cockroaches? laughing
                Black, what cockroaches ?, the Chinese ?! No.
    3. Lynx33
      Lynx33 4 May 2018 13: 54
      0
      It can’t be closed in the head, everything has been closed for them there for a long time and it never opens.
    4. Semen1972
      Semen1972 4 May 2018 14: 27
      0
      our "partners" have been planning these attacks since 1945!

      Wow .. what are they waiting for then? Well, think about destroying each other, but that’s how it is war. If you really want, then you can start the third world. Humanity is mired in sin, the Earth needs to get rid of it. Our wimps are not solved, I hope Trump shies !!!
      1. Yarik
        Yarik 4 May 2018 18: 09
        0
        Even in this extremely unlikely case, are you sure that the "answer" will happen? recourse
      2. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 15
        +3
        I always joke that humanity - this cancerous tumor, must be wiped off the face of the earth. But I want to live and I believe that not all people have already turned into consumers, but there are also creators. The same weapons :))
        1. 11 black
          11 black 5 May 2018 20: 56
          0
          Quote: Ingvar_1970
          I always joke that humanity - this cancerous tumor, must be wiped off the face of the earth. But I want to live and I believe that not all people have already turned into consumers, but there are also creators. The same weapons :))

          The main parasite of planet Earth is well known - sooner or later it must be destroyed, or forced to abandon its destructive activities. And yes, the cult of consumption cannot bring to good, but not all support this cult.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Vanych
      Vanych 4 May 2018 16: 45
      0
      at our ,, partners ", everything has long been locked in the head, and this is no longer a short circuit, but a spike that can no longer be reanimated, only surgically)
    7. Shelest2000
      Shelest2000 4 May 2018 19: 05
      +1
      Once upon a time, about 5-6 years ago, I came across a book, an alternative, about the NATO war with Russia. I don’t remember the name after prescription. So there, preparations for the war with Russia began with the release of a feature film about some kind of emergency I am using our nuclear weapons. Like, the film is based on real events. In Europe and the United States, a tantrum begins to ban our nuclear weapons, plus the media are overwhelmed with "facts" about the barbarism, meanness and inhumanity of the Russians. Against this background, the invasion begins.
      Do not you find that now a very similar situation is developing around Russia? With the escalation of the international situation, provocations against the country and citizens, common hysteria, the outbreak of wars near our borders and next?
      PS. Maybe someone read, remember the book from such a brief description? I would re-read ...
      1. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 18
        0
        That's right, they are preparing their public opinion. And remove our media, which prevented this "their propaganda"
      2. icant007
        icant007 4 May 2018 21: 54
        0
        Well, the invasion is unlikely to begin. But to try to push the topic of tight control over our nuclear weapons from the West is quite possible.
      3. Tomato
        Tomato 4 May 2018 23: 16
        0
        Please tell me, do you talk about the USA impartially and objectively?
        Simply put - do you love America with all your heart, faithfully and wholeheartedly. Maybe you are just an Americanophobe.
        1. SETTGF
          SETTGF 5 May 2018 04: 08
          +2
          Tomatoes, a liberal Latvian schoolboy! I’m not tired of writing and trolling your stupidities regarding Russian policy! You probably made a mistake with the site ?!
      4. edmed
        edmed 4 May 2018 23: 54
        +2
        Abrams in Khimki
        1. Shelest2000
          Shelest2000 5 May 2018 10: 53
          0
          Abrams in Khimki

          ABOUT! Right! Thank!
      5. dzuar saubarag
        dzuar saubarag 5 May 2018 14: 57
        +2
        Author Igor Anisimov "Abrams in Khimki", a trilogy. Actually the author is interesting and corrosive to the smallest detail, and therefore convincing.
        1. edmed
          edmed 5 May 2018 16: 11
          +2
          Actually the author is interesting and corrosive to the smallest detail, and therefore convincing. Unfortunately, it is extremely convincing. PS Where can I read part 3 in the public domain?
          1. dzuar saubarag
            dzuar saubarag 5 May 2018 16: 48
            +2
            I read on some website, names, unfortunately, I do not remember. Yes, it is precisely such detail that makes the story natural, and therefore scary. It seems these books were on the filibust ...
            1. edmed
              edmed 5 May 2018 18: 00
              0
              Thanks for the tip! Looking at reality and fiction, it seems that fiction will come true, but everything is in the hands of the powerful of this world or God, but it's like someone what .
    8. NOVERU
      NOVERU 4 May 2018 21: 19
      0
      not only the answer is holding back but also those who prevented the attempt to launch nuclear missiles during the 2nd Korean war
    9. iouris
      iouris 5 May 2018 01: 16
      +2
      The Russian Federation has been leading its history since 1991, and not since 1945.
    10. madjik
      madjik 5 May 2018 10: 19
      0
      So they themselves calculated for us that for a non-nuclear disarming strike in the United States, 111 calibers are needed and they are in the Stone Age laughing
  2. sleeve
    sleeve 4 May 2018 05: 38
    +4
    It is well-reasoned. To everything to mention a couple of times that emerged in Shoigu's speeches “the concept of defensive air defense areas”, in which the Strategic Missile Forces forces and industrial and resource (food and Rosrezerv) capacities are concentrated and, in principle, is normal. Plus, the combat duty of all segments of the videoconferencing has become familiar. So our affairs are not entirely bad. True, they are not bad in terms of RESPONSE GLOBAL DESTRUCTION. But if we ignore the end of human history, then positive.
  3. BecmepH
    BecmepH 4 May 2018 06: 21
    +11
    To neutralize advanced American weapons systems advanced to our borders, when the United States refuses to discuss this issue, Russia can go on a global disarming attack on the US missile defense base areas if the situation escalates further as these missile defense bases become too dangerous. This risk is justified: anyway, war with the Americans seems inevitable. But with this global blow, Russia will remove the immediate military threat on its borders.
    It seems Victor was not seen in the writing of fairy tales. The maximum that our leadership is capable of expressing regret.
    Although, your scenario is correct. So they should act, and not constantly apologize.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 4 May 2018 07: 26
      +11
      So they should act, and not constantly apologize.
      You are basically right. But before striking a missile defense in Europe, it may first be necessary to give a tough response to the Americans in Syria and the Donbass, and then see the reaction. A blow to Europe is a war without a doubt. But a decent answer in hot spots - the global war is in question.
      1. BecmepH
        BecmepH 4 May 2018 07: 49
        +5
        Quote: rotmistr60
        So they should act, and not constantly apologize.
        You are basically right. But before striking a missile defense in Europe, it may first be necessary to give a tough response to the Americans in Syria and the Donbass, and then see the reaction. A blow to Europe is a war without a doubt. But a decent answer in hot spots - the global war is in question.

        That's right. I meant learning how to respond with dignity. And then, for sure, the "partners" who call us the enemy will cool their ardor.
        Comrade Eun showed how to talk with the enemy and aggressor.
        And GDP is everything: "partners, partners ...".
        1. Ingvar_1970
          Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 24
          0
          As a friend, there is less choice and a smaller country, and missiles that can reach the United States. You can glow everything in a couple of hours,
      2. max702
        max702 4 May 2018 12: 15
        +6
        Quote: rotmistr60
        A blow to Europe is a war without a doubt.

        On the contrary, this is the end of the war .. By destroying the bases in Europe, we will demonstrate the ability to go all the way while destroying the threatening potential (the US doesn’t really feel sorry for Europeans) thereby forcing us to sit at the negotiating table .. The Americans will not press any button since we demonstrated our determination they want to live much more than us ..
        1. Ingvar_1970
          Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 28
          0
          It is quite possible, all the more so since they have not expected this from us for centuries.
        2. 11 black
          11 black 5 May 2018 21: 03
          0
          Quote: max702
          On the contrary, this is the end of the war .. By destroying the bases in Europe, we will demonstrate the ability to go all the way while destroying the threatening potential (the US doesn’t really feel sorry for Europeans) thereby forcing us to sit at the negotiating table .. The Americans will not press any button since we demonstrated our determination they want to live much more than us ..

          Then there will be a war with Europe 2.0, millions of Russians and millions of Europeans will die, the Russian economy will be destroyed like many cities, the United States will reset its national debt ... it’s necessary to hit the Americans and only the Americans.
          1. max702
            max702 5 May 2018 22: 54
            0
            Quote: 11 black
            Then there will be a war with Europe 2.0,

            Will not be! A few dozen glazed bases will just bring down the arrogance with the USA, and the Europeans will give a clear hint that it’s enough to be a bargaining chip ... Russia is a big Europe small .. We can then continue for a long time, but they’re not like .. And if TMV then there’s only one outcome .. But the USA won’t do this first of all, they have something to lose and they have other options for influence ... In general, since the beginning of the nuclear weapons era, everything has changed dramatically, Comrade Kim recently proved it ..
      3. Firebird
        Firebird 4 May 2018 14: 45
        +6
        And where does Syria, Donbass and Europe?
        The Americans have never sniffed war, with the exception of the distant civil and liberation, in their own territory.
        Therefore, the strike should be ONLY in the United States. If the Americans are aware of this, then public opinion will be different. The individualist society is very cowardly.
        And do not care about the rules.
        1. amirbek
          amirbek 4 May 2018 15: 31
          +1
          Quote: Firebird
          And do not care about the rules.

          we walk so calm we are silent ... we find a point such where the derivative is equal to zero and then for no reason and with no reason SHARAH with a needle and everything fell in different directions bully
          1. Ingvar_1970
            Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 31
            0
            Are you Dear about the break? Technically, it seems feasible, but what will become of the planet?
    2. Eduard petrov
      Eduard petrov 4 May 2018 08: 08
      +9
      Russia may take a global disarming strike on US missile defense areas

      So they should act, and not constantly apologize.

      Comrade, what is the war in Europe? Crimea was taken away - thousands of investment programs in the country were curtailed, we are fighting very limited contingents in the Donbass, Syria - the budget is bursting at the seams, pension indexations are frozen, over 20 million beggars are over (only officially), the rich are getting rich - the poor are getting poorer, for the first time in 19 years the military budget has been reduced (in a warring country !!), you can still write a milliard of words ... What the hell is a global war? What a blow to Europe? The economic potentials of the countries of the West and the Russian Federation are not comparable - they can fight for decades, and our enterprises and the entire industry belong to offshore companies (banal fives, magnets and everything else, everything is literally!), Except for some "strategic" enterprises. Most of all, those who least understand what is happening want to fight.
      1. Victor Kamenev
        4 May 2018 09: 48
        +10
        Where are the thousands of investment programs that turned the West? What kind of nonsense? Millyard of panicky liberal words is easy to write, and not to notice that Russia's GDP is growing, and the standard of living in the country has not fallen: have you been on the street for the last time? The car has nowhere to park ... All the rich steel?
        1. BecmepH
          BecmepH 4 May 2018 09: 53
          +7
          Quote: Victor Kamenev
          There’s nowhere to park a car ... Have all the rich become?

          So this is not an indicator of wealth. Cars, almost all, are taken on credit.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 4 May 2018 10: 23
            +5
            Quote: BecmepH
            Cars, almost all, are taken on credit

            That's just it - nothing at all "not an indicator."
            To get a loan, you must confirm the possibility of repayment, at least. Thus, the notorious "twenty million beggars" car loan is definitely not threatened.
            And cars, however, are becoming more and more request
            1. BecmepH
              BecmepH 4 May 2018 12: 22
              +6
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              To get a loan, you must confirm the possibility of repayment, at least.

              What's the problem? Reference? Yes, this is not a problem. Guarantors? Do not need them. And the Bank issues PTS to its hands, but does not leave it, as before at home.
              Okay, this is all empty argument. Dear Golovan Jack, tell me, do you really think that our people live in abundance and receive a decent salary? Just do not, they say, every blacksmith of his own happiness.
              And there is no place to park the car, because there is no space left after the point building. I lived in a house where about 600 families live, and I counted 125 cars. Well, add another half a hundred, and here’s “there are two cars in each family” ...
              Walk through the Khrushchev districts. There is plenty of free space at home
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack 4 May 2018 13: 48
                +2
                Quote: BecmepH
                Do you really think that our people live in abundance and receive a decent salary?

                About "prosperity": how to look, and what to consider prosperity. From hunger, as I understand it, no one is dying now. Other - the issue of matching capabilities to needs.
                About the "decent" - I don’t understand at all. Decent - why? The quantity / quality of the product, labor, what?
                If you want an answer, specify the question. I warn you: I have the experience of living at completely different, from zero to quite decent, income levels.
                Quote: BecmepH
                here’s “two cars in every family”

                Well, nobody talked about this, as it were. And the fact that there are really a lot of cars (and compared to 70s and 80s - it’s so simple VERY much) is, in my opinion, obvious. Cars cost money, someone buys them, which means that the population still has money.
                Quote: BecmepH
                Walk through the Khrushchev districts. There is plenty of free space at home

                Korolev of Moscow. Not fullbelieve me.
                1. BecmepH
                  BecmepH 4 May 2018 14: 39
                  +4
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  in comparison with 70s - 80s - it’s just VERY much) - this, in my opinion, is obvious.
                  It’s a bit wrong to compare with 70s. Previously, refrigerators and TVs were out of the ordinary. Then the Vidic. People climbed out of their skin to be "no worse than others." So it is about now. Does the neighbor have a car? And I will have it. Do you have a neighbor iPhone? And what am I worse?
                  In simplified terms, I would call all this a tribute to fashion. The desire to be no worse than others.
                  It’s good that not everyone is infected yet.
                  What is wealth? I think this is when you take the car that you liked, and not the one for which you can handle the loan. There are many examples. But, the message, I think, is understandable.
                  Worthy life? This is when you live in prosperity and the state takes care of you, and does not advise you to stay, at a time when we are adding billionaires, and the state promises not to leave them in trouble in case of sanctions.
                  1. Golovan Jack
                    Golovan Jack 4 May 2018 15: 26
                    +2
                    Quote: BecmepH
                    What is wealth? I think this is when you take the car that you liked, and not the one for which you master the loan

                    Cool. That is, the question of "take - do not take" is not worth it, but it is necessary that "like" belay
                    According to "such concepts" in our country, I think, very few of us "live in abundance."
                    Nevertheless, it seems to me that this “sufficiency” is determined mainly the ratio of hotelok and the amount of money available. No more.
                    And, yes - I personally do not understand people taking consumer loans. You take strangers, but you have to give your own, and much more than you took request
                2. Not in the system
                  Not in the system 4 May 2018 16: 27
                  +3
                  This is an advantage when it is not scary and not unprofitable to produce and support three or more children and not think about it, just as they do not think about whether it is unprofitable or not to buy a car.
                  1. Golovan Jack
                    Golovan Jack 4 May 2018 16: 41
                    0
                    Quote: Not in the system
                    This is a benefit when it is not scary and not unprofitable to produce and support three or more children and not to think about it

                    I return to the original: this, basically,
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    the issue of matching opportunities with needs

                    By the way, about the "three or more" - that you powerfully pushed. Combine all this with work, for example - will it work? Right?
                    * amused "not expensive" for some reason.
                    1. Not in the system
                      Not in the system 4 May 2018 16: 55
                      +2
                      In one of the topics I already wrote that the state should pay for the children, then the birth rate among the Russians from the negative will be positive: a child is born, a working family member doubles the salary (all the time until the child’s 18th birthday), the second - three times the original, the third - four times, etc. This will also solve the problem of demography among Russians, people will stop drinking and start working - they will monitor their own health and the health of children, and much more.
                      1. Golovan Jack
                        Golovan Jack 4 May 2018 17: 24
                        +3
                        Quote: Not in the system
                        This will solve the problem of demography among Russians, people will stop drinking and start working.

                        Nah ...
                        Firstly, in order to decide "among the Russians," your rule should be applied only to the Russians.
                        Secondly, why work when you can stupidly give birth? What is the incentive to upgrade your skills when you can have a baby and jump right over a couple of steps in your salary?
                        And ninth, didn’t you have to deal with the case when there are children in the family, and the family, nevertheless, is thumping? I just had to.
                        Not to mention the complete utopianism of your “scheme” from the point of view of elementary, ahem, economics. What for, for example, an employer is an average employee with three children, when for the same money he will find a super, and without children? Which will also be more reliable - children, for example, have the property of being sick and, in general, distracting a person from work ...
                        Some kind of nonsense you did, excuse me request
          2. Firebird
            Firebird 4 May 2018 14: 49
            +1
            We still have a very low% of credit cars or mortgage housing.
            Unlike the USA and Europe.
            We have a very high% of household savings. This is not there. Another culture of consumption.
            So from this point of view, we are richer.
            1. kipod
              kipod 4 May 2018 14: 50
              +2
              Quote: Firebird
              We still have a very low% loan car or mortgage.
              Unlike the USA and Europe.
              We have a very high% of household savings. This is not there. Another culture of consumption.

              Well, in this case, the Papuans are generally out of competition.
      2. SETTGF
        SETTGF 4 May 2018 14: 09
        +2
        Eduard Petrov! No need to write silly babble, liberal strategist! Carefully read the article ... New military means will not have to fight for decades! Russia does not fight in the Donbass, but helps the people of Donbass survive! With Syria, we have an agreement on Friendship and mutual assistance since the days of the USSR, Russia is the legal successor of the USSR! The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer - this is a consequence of capitalism! The situation is gradually improving! And about the army, do not write liberal nonsense! A people who will not feed their army will feed a stranger ... will be enslaved and not only!
      3. andrew42
        andrew42 4 May 2018 16: 40
        +3
        It’s hard not to agree. A protracted, even smoldering, war will not pull. The political system is not that. The mobilization opportunities of the economy are scanty. But the "investment program" has nothing to do with it - we know these investments in "fast money". We need re-industrialization, the locomotives of technological breakthroughs and in the applied, in the applied sphere. But with the current economic model this is not possible. Only mega-state projects can save us, as a "nuclear project", in all sectors of the national economy. But the political system of power of “Putin’s friends” (thank God at least not the Gaidar liberoids in their pure form - but still bourgeois, nobility) - it is impotent, the mountain gives birth to mice. So, contrary to the storytellers, it turns out that “politics determines the economy”, more precisely the political system — and not vice versa, as “progressive” economists like to hang noodles, who cannot distinguish between the political structure of the state and current politics in the struggle for economic resources.
        1. Ingvar_1970
          Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 36
          +1
          Do not forget who fights for money - loses. What will be the economy after dropping a depth bomb on communications cables in the Atlantic and launching a "bucket of nails" into space?
      4. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 34
        +1
        From this point of view, yes, but what economic potential are you talking about? The economy of paper? Any spitting will dump her into the abyss!
    3. Victor Kamenev
      4 May 2018 09: 43
      +4
      Not only regrets: Crimea, Donbass, Syria are not fairy tales, they are serious counterattacks of Russia, but the mood with “throwing hats” should be set aside. The latest weapons still in the series did not go ...
      1. Semen1972
        Semen1972 4 May 2018 13: 41
        +4
        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        Not only regrets: Crimea, Donbass, Syria

        Do not make me laugh. Did anyone use weapons in Crimea? Read the liberals, then they write nonsense here. And with Donbass, how did we respond? Can you tell me? From the Caspian Sea on Bandera beat ?? If not for the feat of the miners, everything would end badly there. Or do you believe in fairy tales about our participation in the Donbass ??? Is there any evidence? Or so the "west" said?
        1. Balagan
          Balagan 5 May 2018 01: 28
          +1
          If no one had used weapons in the Crimea, then why would the marines of the Heroes of Russia stand on their chests?
          There were still some moments.
          1. Semen1972
            Semen1972 7 May 2018 09: 44
            0
            Quote: booth
            If no one had used weapons in the Crimea, then why would the marines of the Heroes of Russia stand on their chests?
            There were still some moments.

            For prevention to interfere with the peaceful expression of the will of people.
      2. SETTGF
        SETTGF 4 May 2018 14: 14
        +1
        Victor Kamenev! Complex "Dagger" in service and in the series ... and the S-400 (S-500) is already in the series ...
      3. Not in the system
        Not in the system 4 May 2018 16: 31
        +3
        What new weapons are you talking about? Could it be about a rocket with an atomic engine that can fly in circles around the planet (simultaneously leaving a strong radioactive trail behind the face)?
        1. Ingvar_1970
          Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 40
          +1
          She won’t leave a loop, you understand that the reactor is not there like a jet engine. And here is how it flies - even American scientists can only guess. It will be what they sell in the 25th century.
          1. Grandfather Eugene
            Grandfather Eugene 10 May 2018 23: 50
            0
            Quote: Ingvar_1970
            a rocket with an atomic engine that can fly in circles around the planet (simultaneously leaving a strong radioactive trail behind the face


            Somewhere almost on a military review there was an article about the project of the United States with a nuclear-powered rocket with a radiation loop, which the developers wanted to use as additional damage, note.

            Quote: Ingvar_1970
            And here is how it flies - even American scientists can only guess. It will be what they sell in the 25th century.


            Of course, you’re sorry, but I read there the air warms up to high temperatures and this is what creates the jet propulsion.
  4. Brigadier
    Brigadier 4 May 2018 09: 08
    +7
    "Russia may take a global disarming strike against the US missile defense basing areas with a further aggravation of the situation, since these missile defense bases are becoming too dangerous."
    ... and almost 100% will deprive the Russian "elite" of all their "honestly earned capital", which are now in the West, in the event that NATO decides not to aggravate the situation after these missile defense bases are wiped off the face of the earth ...
    On behalf of all Russian oligarchs, I declare responsibly: "No way!" stop
    What did Papanov say in The Diamond Arm? - "No. I can’t understand this!" laughing
    Because the people have no money, but they have it!
    1. Victor Kamenev
      4 May 2018 09: 56
      +2
      You do not know that not oligarchs make decisions, but oligarchs are mortal, that is, they are people, and they can think like you. Even the kinship of our oligarchs with the Germans could not prevent the First World War. And Marx simply deceived you when he said that capital does not have a homeland, it still has it, but you don’t want to see it, because you are sick!
      1. SETTGF
        SETTGF 4 May 2018 14: 20
        +1
        Victor Kamenev! Please link to K. Marx’s statement ... apparently, you don’t know his statements, if you write his name with errors!
        1. Andrey Gladkikh
          Andrey Gladkikh 6 May 2018 14: 31
          0
          There is no Marx name in that post. Only last name. The capital “A” in this case is a union, which follows from the meaning of the sentence. And it’s capital because it’s the beginning of the sentence. More carefully, if someone points out errors.
    2. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 42
      0
      Exactly! As long as the probability of profit from the world is higher than from war - there will be no war!
  5. sa-ag
    sa-ag 4 May 2018 09: 42
    +4
    Will the US risk its own security by attacking Russian territory in return?

    No, sleep calmly comrade, they will do this by economic methods.
    1. Semen1972
      Semen1972 4 May 2018 13: 38
      +2
      No, sleep calmly comrade, they will do this by economic methods.

      Do not tell, scared a hedgehog naked booty. We have a salary of 15-20 tr, what other sanctions, we do not care about sanctions. As long as there is vodka and potatoes are born, we can not beat !!!!
    2. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 43
      0
      You look at their public debt - the methods are limited.
  6. sapporo1959
    sapporo1959 4 May 2018 11: 45
    +5
    The blow is still a blow and we almost won! I think the arrival of Kudrin in the team of our beloved leader will strengthen our not only nuclear forces, but also our fighting spirit, as well as finances and other little things ..
    1. Not in the system
      Not in the system 4 May 2018 16: 37
      +1
      It's sarcasm ? If you are seriously, then this is idiocy. Look at Andrey Fursov’s lectures and you will understand WHOM Kudrin can strengthen and what kind of creature this is.
      1. sapporo1959
        sapporo1959 4 May 2018 17: 58
        +1
        I immediately see the fifth column in you right away. So I think about writing about our economic guru and the leader’s friend, but to put it mildly, I’m also pulling on an article .. I would obviously go and benefit from reading elements and writers alien to us ..
        1. Not in the system
          Not in the system 5 May 2018 14: 43
          0
          I still do not understand - is it sarcasm, or in all seriousness. Not so long ago I read the book Delyagin "Lights of Darkness." So, your "guru" is mentioned in this book. However, after reading the chapters about everyone who is mentioned in this book, I want to stomp on their faces until these faces, together with their heads, turn into a thin bloody pancake. If such as Fursov are elements alien to you, then the fifth column is clearly you.
          1. sapporo1959
            sapporo1959 6 May 2018 11: 27
            0
            Wonderful things! Everything seems to be for Putin, but for some reason, the best economists included in his friendly team raising us from our knees are immediately entered into some sort of column? I don’t even understand the old man for whom ...
            1. Not in the system
              Not in the system 6 May 2018 16: 06
              0
              Who is Putin? Are you I am not for him. I only once voted for him - in the year 2000. After - he did not vote once, or - against everyone (when such a column was in the ballots). And this year he voted for Grudinin. Is Kudrin the best economist ?! You also decided to mock? Who are you anyway? A Kremlinologist on the salary of propagandists of the Putin regime?
            2. Golovan Jack
              Golovan Jack 6 May 2018 16: 18
              +1
              Quote: sapporo1959
              sapporo1959

              Quote: Not in the system
              Not in the system

              Ess good laughing good
  7. Tektor
    Tektor 4 May 2018 12: 58
    0
    If you destroy the missile defense base in Romania in such a way that there is no unambiguous reference to us, then this could be an accident with the crash of some plane that accidentally falls directly onto the radar and launchers. Let it be a transport plane ...
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 48
      0
      And let it be a NATO transport plane! We already have a lot of their electronics.
      1. Ace Tambourine
        Ace Tambourine 6 May 2018 23: 04
        0
        And let him fly from Afghanistan ...
        Romanians are already not far from the mind, and after a cloud of sprayed cargo ...
  8. KOLEGAN
    KOLEGAN 4 May 2018 13: 01
    +2
    For our security, we must create conditions when: 1. First of all, the territory of the United States, its bases, bases on the territory of NATO countries and the territories of these countries should be exposed to nuclear attack in the shortest possible time in the event of an attack on our country or allies (unless our army and navy are there). 2. Create conditions for the quick and reliable neutralization of aircraft carrier strike groups of the United States and NATO countries around the world and the destruction of their nuclear submarine fleet. 3. Possess superiority in the availability and readiness for the use of space weapons throughout the United States, NATO countries and their satellites 4. Have the best system in the world to protect their territory from enemy attacks, using a deeply layered electronic warning and counteraction system. 5. Use breakthrough technologies to neutralize traditional and non-traditional forms of enemy weapons. 6. Build a strong, flexible, competitive and ready for operational restructuring in the event of a military conflict, the economy that underlies any of the previous points. 7. And at the same time be able not to forget about the well-being of our people. You can add and add here more and more, but when all this is done, not a single American mug will even dare to look towards the nuclear button (I’m not even talking about the other mongrels). There is still a lot to do.
    1. Ace Tambourine
      Ace Tambourine 6 May 2018 23: 07
      0
      Comrade ...
      Before declaring this, make sure that there is, and, first of all, the real readiness of the bomb shelter in your NP.
  9. Semen1972
    Semen1972 4 May 2018 13: 29
    +2
    So, the West, led by the United States, is conducting psychological preparation of its public opinion for a war with Russia, the military infrastructure of the United States and NATO are moving towards the borders of Russia, Western experts are talking about a preventive disarming strike on Russia, this is a fact. From this we can conclude that the attack of the United States and its satellites is almost inevitable

    If VO analysts are talking about an imminent war ... maybe then you should not pay the mortgage? And the question torments me ... to attack first is always more correct. The effect of surprise. Why are we silent where the air strikes at the enemy ???? We will wait so long that migrants from Arizona will trample our Siberia !!! We have a rocket that flies an unlimited amount of time and is invulnerable. It is necessary to launch already and at hour X they will destroy the enemies !!!!! How long, comrades, will we tolerate this ????
    1. Not in the system
      Not in the system 4 May 2018 16: 44
      0
      Launching such a rocket is only cost-effective when the exchange of nuclear strikes has already gone and doesn’t give a damn, because an engine with an atomic reactor in flight leaves a powerful radioactive trail. And all this then settles and there is a radioactive infection of the area where the rocket flew.
      1. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 51
        0
        How do you know about the trace of the engine - the principle of the rocket’s operation is not even clear to me, although I guess - there’s no trace there, in general!
        1. Not in the system
          Not in the system 5 May 2018 14: 49
          0
          The engine is a nuclear reactor. It should be cooled during operation, so as not to jerk ahead of time ... Must. And how will it cool? Naturally, not with water (in flight), but with a stream of incoming air. And air from the reactor (like water at nuclear power plants) is already radioactive. Something like this.
    2. NordUral
      NordUral 4 May 2018 19: 14
      0
      You need to Petrosyan, just his level.
  10. dmitry.kashkaryow
    dmitry.kashkaryow 4 May 2018 13: 32
    +1
    Quote: Eduard Petrov
    Most of all, those who least understand what is happening want to fight.

    If you have nonsense, be treated! Who was talking about desire? Nobody asks us about our desire. They crush it. Therefore, with one blow, you can break this noose. A global blow to the areas where the US troops are stationed in Europe will instantly force the United States to leave the oceans, and Europe will lie down, this old prostitute doesn’t lie under anyone. All the same, there is nothing to fight Europe, and the States will not risk their territory.
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 57
      0
      One of the scenarios. European countries are starting to fight among themselves, as has always been the case, we are pulling ourselves to put things in order, and the United States is making money for both of them - IDEAL!
  11. tazilion
    tazilion 4 May 2018 16: 05
    0
    Russia’s global blow to the West is possible
    G U R P Z V I or ВGZ and PР Уwhere is the selection of "B" from VGZ; "U" from Yiwu; "R" from the PR (that is, a blow to Russia is possible)
    104 6 2 6 8 8 or 24 6s6r 8v8i 10, where the choice is "4" from 24; "6p" from 6z6r; "8v" of 8v8i (i.e. a strike of Russia is possible)
    And one must be prepared for such a development of events.
    And if you take into account what was said about the inadmissibility of war on its territory, then the blow becomes
    compulsory.
  12. daodejin
    daodejin 4 May 2018 16: 15
    +1
    I would also like to add about the northern sea route, on which the USA opens its mouth. Under a plausible pretext: such as a "free economic zone", they want to take it under their dictatorship (as is already happening with the EU, NATO, UN). And Russia will be in the ring.
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 19: 59
      0
      Here it is necessary to break off immediately, which is what we are doing. Let them go there with their one and a half icebreakers.
  13. poxmelie
    poxmelie 4 May 2018 16: 57
    +1
    so someone said that you need to beat first
  14. The comment was deleted.
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 20: 01
      0
      In the words of a familiar psychiatrist: It is still unknown which of us is sick!
  15. Rarahin
    Rarahin 4 May 2018 17: 06
    +1
    Before whom do we play nobility?

    Russia never plays nobility before anyone. Since nobility possesses in full. Since the time of Svyatoslav, who sent news to his enemies:
    "I'm coming to you"
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 20: 03
      0
      Sometimes you even need to let the world sink into the chaos to which it strives all the time.
  16. The comment was deleted.
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 4 May 2018 19: 08
      +1
      Having deprived the States of the opportunity to deliver the first and disarming strike, we will deprive them of the will to launch a global strike, to which our answer will certainly be.
      I would not have decided on such a place in the place of their president.
      The question is only one small thing - and the Kremlin is capable of a preemptive strike in the event that it becomes inevitably clear that only in it is the salvation of Russia and the world, no matter how strange it may seem at first glance?
    2. NordUral
      NordUral 4 May 2018 19: 11
      +1
      It will not work painlessly, Sergey. The West is huddled in a flock of jackals, taking into account the negative experience of the Second World War.
    3. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 20: 04
      0
      These care methods are illegal and war is legal!
    4. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 20: 05
      0
      Note that in all the world the USA were our partners, are you sure that they will not be in the 3rd?
  17. Old military officer
    Old military officer 4 May 2018 17: 19
    +1
    You are right, but the main message of the article, nevertheless, is different: about the possibility of delivering a preemptive strike precisely by RUSSIA.
    ] June 22, the 41st never again [/ b] should not be repeated! [/ Quote]
    That's right, never again. It is impossible to persuade or convince the whole of this "advanced world community". While they are constrained by the calculated level of unacceptable losses, that is, the possibility of a large grab. And then another Fuhrer appears and all over again? No, thanks, passed.
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 20: 43
      0
      They have no Fuhrer yet, the main thing is not to miss this moment.
  18. Gennady Voloshin
    Gennady Voloshin 4 May 2018 17: 38
    +1
    First you need to rid the country of liberalism.
    Then throw all your strength into the production and launch of the Status 6 product.
    Put the right number of charges in the right places and declare that you are dear partners now under the hood. Amend our doctrine. Those. in any attempt to attack Russia, any member of NATO, or any weapon, a retaliatory nuclear strike will be dealt to the United States and to those countries from which the threat came.
    I think it will cool them.
    And only then you can calmly deal with your country, economy and everything else.
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 4 May 2018 19: 03
      +1
      It is possible and easier. Small bomb submarines will quietly come in the quietest way to the west and east coast of the United States and quietly lie in neutral waters until the hour of Ch.
      Inhuman? And in no case is it more inhumane than a blow to Russia. They are turning to us.
      We do not climb to them,
      1. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 20: 45
        0
        Not just lying, but changing according to the schedule of combat duty. Sometimes accidents happen, than we dumbfire partners and their anti-submarine defense - surfacing under your nose!
  19. The comment was deleted.
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 4 May 2018 18: 58
      0
      We will corrode, like bugs, a friend of the troll.
  20. Victor Detective South
    Victor Detective South 4 May 2018 18: 33
    0
    Maybe it’s better to suggest they give up?
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 4 May 2018 18: 58
      0
      They don’t understand, they are exceptional.
  21. NordUral
    NordUral 4 May 2018 18: 56
    +1
    I agree with the author, we were driven into a corner. And only a sudden blow to the launch of cruise (and other) missiles will save us from the inevitable death of Moscow, St. Petersburg and other cities in the European part of Russia, and Siberian and Far Eastern ones too. As will leave the main nuclear missile defense potential intact.
    And my conscience will not torment me in such a solution to the country's security issue, we are not putting launchers at our borders. Until my Peter, minutes of summer. The option of the Great Patriotic War at the new technological stage is no longer possible, time plays the role, not time and distance. We no longer have the strategic distance; the enemy is already trampling the threshold of our house.
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 20: 50
      0
      Yes, time is already shaking. As there will be a high probability of not receiving an answer, the fate of Hiroshima and Nagasaki awaits us. Moreover, they won’t even think about human rights. Hypocrites.
  22. demo
    demo 4 May 2018 19: 22
    +2
    The operation of the Russian Aerospace Force in Syria gave Russia two bases on the shores of the Mediterranean, with which we broke through the NATO front in Turkey. The Syrian bases of Russia embrace NATO from the south-east, Russia begins to surround NATO itself - this is the strategic importance of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Force in Syria. Under attack, the US Navy is in the eastern Mediterranean, and he is deprived of the opportunity to attack Russia with missiles from the Mediterranean.

    Especially for the author.
    Red lines indicate countries that are or are under NATO control.
    Ukraine is not specifically emphasized.
    Her role will be completely different.
    And where the author saw that Russia surrounds the NATO bloc from the south. And controls the Mediterranean operations of NATO and US troops?
    One can imagine that tomorrow Iraq will prohibit the movement of manpower from Iran through its territory, the passage of aircraft, and the transport of equipment. And that’s all! Arrived. Syrian troops such help oh as needed.
    All other "neighbors" are still those wolves. So they look as if to chop off.
    Israel alone is worth it.
    Lebanon, Jordan are so white and fluffy. Only one allows Israeli planes to hit rockets in Syria from its airspace, and the other heals and restores barmaley. I will not say anything about Turkey.
    Which fortel this twisted tail will throw out and when - only Allah knows.
    Suppose Syria has been freed to some extent. But can two bases (not in the full sense of the word today) be able to oppose something to the allied forces of NATO in the Mediterranean Sea?
    This will be Tsushima 2. In the sense of our heroism. And achieving goals.
    Syria needs to be saturated with the most modern weapons. And at whose expense the banquet.
    The country is in ruins. There is no money and no one is foreseen.
    Who will pay for all this?
    And where to get the specialists?
    Our send advisers?
    And in the end?
    But in the end, one thing.
    Gazprom will not get a competitor in the person of Qatar with its cheap gas of gigantic volumes.
    That's it.
    So Gazprom must restore Syria (it is also the beneficiary)?
    But is this our, Russian, national treasure? Why should we squander it on God does everyone know what?
    Devilry around.
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 4 May 2018 20: 53
      0
      Therefore, strategic missiles and for all purposes! Right! a half-war will not work, and humanity has already outlived itself, sadly, but there must be a courageous man who will put an end to this! Alas...
  23. NordOst16
    NordOst16 4 May 2018 23: 33
    0
    as the USSR did on the eve of the inevitable, if only for ideological reasons, war with Nazi Nazi Germany
    - divided Poland and repressed the entire command staff. A good joke of the author.
    1. Not in the system
      Not in the system 5 May 2018 15: 05
      0
      "Divided Poland" - Poland no longer existed as a state when Soviet troops entered it, because the government was already draped and the troops were also draping, raising their legs above their ears. Moreover, the Soviet troops did not go further than those lands that were originally and always inhabited by Russians (later became Byelorussians, Rusyns, Hutsuls, Lemks and Ukrainians). And they didn’t drape from the Soviet troops. They surrendered to Soviet troops. This is what command staff was repressed illegally? Surname please. Tukhachevsky, who organized a conspiracy with the participation of English and German politicians? The traitor and traitor Pavlov?
      1. NordOst16
        NordOst16 5 May 2018 16: 27
        0
        - Poland no longer existed as a state when Soviet troops entered it, because the government was already draped and the troops were also draping, raising their legs above their ears.

        This does not detract from the very fact of aggression and occupation of the Republic.

        Quote: Not in the system
        Tukhachevsky, who organized a conspiracy with the participation of English and German politicians

        He so carefully organized everything that in 1957 he was rehabilitated for lack of corpus delicti.

        This is what command staff was repressed illegally? Surname please.

        Many names, you can look at the same wiki (List of repressed high commanders and commanders of the Armed forces of the USSR (1935-1945))
        What is most ridiculous, they were apparently such dangerous enemies of the people that the vast majority were rehabilitated in the 50s. Although it is very curious that the main executioners (Yagoda, Malinkov, Beria) also did not live long.
        1. Not in the system
          Not in the system 5 May 2018 19: 03
          0
          Wikis are an extremely dubious and biased source of information. They were rehabilitated by Khrushchev, who, before the cut, had to introduce Stalin and Beria as reptiles. The Chinese turned away from the USSR precisely after the assassination of Stalin. The Albanians were very great friends of the country, but after the assassination of Stalin (Khrushchev poisoned him), Khoja (the then leader in Albania) directly hated Khrushchev. Beria was generally demonized. Are you aware that the criminal case against Beria was fabricated retroactively when he was already killed? And the worthless Batitsky killed him in collusion with Khrushchev, whom Khrushchev later promoted very highly for this. The list of girls who said that Beria allegedly raped them miraculously coincides with the list of actresses, who, competing with each other - who are the most, were fucked by Vlasik and Abakumov.
  24. Balagan
    Balagan 5 May 2018 01: 10
    +1
    Another thing surprises me. What do we immediately rush to the base, but forget about the territory of Pindostana?
    Well, the answer to the bases is clear. And then along the White House and the Pentagon - for nefig breed dilute.
  25. Rinat Nurmukhametov
    Rinat Nurmukhametov 5 May 2018 11: 18
    0
    Show the house where 600 families live
  26. Like this
    Like this 5 May 2018 12: 03
    0
    I doubt the nuclear potential, money is needed there and science ..
  27. Not in the system
    Not in the system 5 May 2018 14: 37
    0
    Golovan Jack,
    are mistaken. Badly mistaken. Of course, they will start throwing me shit at me, but I’ll still say - here it is necessary to apply the eugenic approach. Drinkers - do not increase, because their children with defective genetics will be born. As for Russian-non-Russian, I meant all the peoples of the country for whom Russian culture and the Russian language are native.
  28. Old26
    Old26 5 May 2018 15: 48
    0
    Quote: Semen1972
    We have a rocket that flies an unlimited amount of time and is invulnerable.

    Are you so naive that you think that is? And most importantly invulnerable?

    Quote: SETTGF
    Victor Kamenev! Complex "Dagger" in service and in the series ... and the S-400 (S-500) is already in the series ...

    Respected. "Dagger" only in Akhtubinsk, at the training ground. Adopting a complex that has never flown a certain distance and hit a surface target (which is impossible to hide) is the height of recklessness. The S-500 is neither in the series nor in service. No need to invent.

    Quote: Ingvar_1970
    She won’t leave a loop, you understand that the reactor is not there like a jet engine. And here is how it flies - even American scientists can only guess. It will be what they sell in the 25th century.

    Sorry, but how does it work then, this reactor?

    Quote: KOLEGAN
    For our safety, we must create the conditions when:.

    Should, or can?

    Quote: KOLEGAN
    1. First of all, the territory of the United States, its bases, bases on the territory of NATO countries and the territories of these countries should be subject to nuclear attack in the shortest possible time in the event of an attack on our country or allies (if there are any other than our army and navy) ..

    This condition is already fulfilled. Even if we take into account that during the first, preventive strike by the West, part of our strategic forces can be destroyed, the remaining ammunition is enough to multiply the main enemy states by zero.

    Quote: KOLEGAN
    2. Create conditions for the quick and reliable neutralization of aircraft carrier strike groups of the United States and NATO countries around the world and the destruction of their nuclear submarine fleet. .

    This condition is not feasible in purely technical terms. We cannot destroy, all the more quickly and reliably, the USA AUG due to the fact that they can be scattered across all the seas and oceans of the planet. The submarine fleet - there are no prospects at all. The number of nuclear boats (not missile carriers) among Americans and their allies exceeds the number of our boats. And at times

    Quote: KOLEGAN
    3. Possess superiority in the availability and readiness for the use of space weapons throughout the United States, NATO countries and their satellites.

    Indelicate question. And it, we have such a strike space weapon? Or just in dreams?

    Quote: KOLEGAN
    4. To possess the best system in the world to protect their territory from enemy attacks, using a deeply layered system of electronic warning and countermeasures. .

    A layered warning system is not yet a defense of one's own territory. A missile defense system that can "cover" the country will not be pulled NOT ONE COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. Only focal, zonal. Nor is it a fact that it will be impossible to break through.

    Quote: KOLEGAN
    5. Use breakthrough technologies to neutralize traditional and non-traditional forms of enemy weapons.

    Sorry, words about nothing. What breakthrough technologies can you offer, say, to neutralize ballistic missiles or armored forces?

    Quote: KOLEGAN
    6. Build a strong, flexible, competitive and ready for operational restructuring in the event of a military conflict, the economy that underlies any of the previous points.

    When? On the 150th anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution? Or maybe the 200th anniversary? We talk a lot about the economy. Are we doing a lot? Since the 2000s, everything seems to have stabilized, the collapse of the 90s has stopped. So what? What, over these almost 20 years, giants such as Uralmash or KAMAZ launched? Built new aircraft factories and automobiles, debugged shipbuilding and mechanical engineering? Alas, nothing of the kind happens. Of course, in every region some factories begin to operate, built from scratch. But when you look at as many as 200 people work at the plant, it becomes clear - this is a city-level plant.
    On the resource they often like to remember Stalin. So, becoming in 1922 the Secretary-General, taking the country into his own hands after the civil war and the devastation of 19 years, he brought it to a level that allowed us to break the backbone of fascism. Having industrialized the country. And what over the past 18 years? There is something to compare? And then the situation was much worse ...

    Quote: KOLEGAN
    7. And at the same time be able not to forget about the well-being of our people. You can add and add here more and more, but when all this is done, not a single American mug will even dare to look towards the nuclear button (I’m not even talking about the other mongrels). There is still a lot to do.

    But this, alas, does not work, like the previous paragraph ...

    Quote: Gennady Voloshin
    Then throw all your strength into the production and launch of the Status 6 product.

    And it is so necessary. After all, production-production, but launching into the ocean a product that is designed to explode off the coast of another country in a day or two is not a sign that Russia has launched hostilities? And are you sure that she will not be attacked?

    Quote: Gennady Voloshin
    Put the right number of charges in the right places and declare that you are dear partners now under the hood.

    Interesting, how many more years or decades will this nonsense be repeated? Any earthquake. capable of generating, in particular, tsunamis, is calculated in terms of TENS AND HUNDREDS OF GIGATONS. Well, you place these same charges in the St. Anders Fault (they don’t talk about anything else). So, what is next? You are aware that any nuclear charge after a certain fairly short period of time, calculated in months, must go through the regulations. That is, you put this charge (by the way, what power) in the fault. Then, after 3-4 months, send your specialized ship there, raise the charge to the surface, carry out routine maintenance and lower it into place. Then go to another. And the Americans are so blind and deaf that they will not notice it. And by the way, I don’t know if you are aware, but around the beginning of the 70s the main countries of the world agreed to stop the development of geophysical (tectonic) weapons. For this weapon UNPREDICTABLE. Earth is a single organism. And blowing up a charge in a fault near the American continent and causing a cataclysm you are not guaranteed that you will not start the same processes in Kamchatka, in the North Caucasus, or that Primorye will not go under water.

    Quote: demo
    Russia's Syrian bases span NATO from the southeast, Russia begins to surround NATO itself - this is the strategic importance of the Russian air forces in Syria.

    Are you serious ??? The airbase, on which 3 dozen planes and PMTOs with a couple of floating bases and a couple of boats, temporarily based there, encompass NATO from the southeast .... Yeah, you have self-conceit, however ...
  29. Lehsus75
    Lehsus75 5 May 2018 18: 03
    0
    The blow will be Kazakhstan, Moldova, ayzerbojan, Armenia
  30. wooja
    wooja 6 May 2018 10: 56
    0
    in war as in war ... what can I say, there are many places where you can hurt to poke Russia, the specter of communism must be urgently resuscitated, given the new conditions, if this is not done here, it will be done there ..., sadly, but this is already happening ..., the Stalinist sharashka is already a reality-- Elon Musk, social issues - Netflix, uber, etc., and a preemptive strike ... it is very possible that the fatherland is really in danger ... but who will ride the horse? who will lead the battle, and who will lead the GKO? capitalism a la russe is specifically at stake,
  31. Ace Tambourine
    Ace Tambourine 6 May 2018 23: 13
    0
    Opposing ...
    What is going on in VO?
    It is not known where such a pack of rank-and-file sergeants came from, and all in the main, with Latin letters in nicknames.
    And everyone is calling for an immediate blow.
    Not only as in the 404th psychiatric hospital dismissed ...
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack 6 May 2018 23: 22
      +1
      Quote: Ace of Diamonds
      And everyone calls for an immediate blow

      Attack of the clowns (s)
      1. Ace Tambourine
        Ace Tambourine 6 May 2018 23: 24
        +1
        Yeah ...
        With kavuns instead of heads ...
  32. Alex66
    Alex66 7 May 2018 10: 24
    0
    It’s easier to leave Medvedev as prime minister, he will ruin everything himself, but he won’t be able to pull up Kudrin, Nabiulina (the best banker), Chubais (with his experience), who knows how many corrupt elites who hide their assets in the west. The jackals attack only the weakened, when we weaken we will divide according to the national, religious (for this we need the freedom to believe who is what much), financial ... then they will devour us.
  33. andrew xnumx
    andrew xnumx 8 May 2018 15: 26
    0
    This must be introduced into our military doctrine.