Seoul turned on the back. What will happen to the US military contingent on the Korean Peninsula?

2 May 2018 78

South Korea’s leadership only a few days after the meeting with representatives of the DPRK delegation, including Kim Jong-un, “turned on the back”. The President of the Republic of Korea, Moon Jae Ying, who, at a meeting with his North Korean counterpart, announced the beginning of a “big peace process” and that Seoul and Pyongyang “are themselves capable of making progress in relations,” now hastened to announce that American troops “should not leave Korean Peninsula. Reported information service Ronhap.

The press service of the President of South Korea spreads the message:

American troops in Korea have no relation to the signing of a peace treaty with the North. They are on the peninsula as part of an allied treaty between the Republic of Korea and the United States.

Seoul turned on the back. What will happen to the US military contingent on the Korean Peninsula?

In the South Korean media, it is also added that Seoul relies on the American military contingent as the "guarantor of security on the peninsula in the neighborhood of a state like China." That is, now begin to link the stay of Americans in the Republic of Korea with the "protection from China"? The security paradigms are changing rapidly, so to speak, and here, obviously, there were no prompts from the American partners.

If Seoul himself passed back, then from his side to expect all the concessions requested from Pyongyang is already too presumptuous.

For reference: at the moment in South Korea is one of the largest US military contingents in the region, numbering almost 30 thousands of troops.

https://www.facebook.com/USarmy

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

arhPavel

+43

2 May 2018 07: 06

No one doubted, Germany is an example of this. Voluntarily US troops do not withdraw from anywhere. Only when they receive on the hill.
1. Bar1
  
  +4
  
  2 May 2018 07: 07
  
  well what will happen?
  Drive them in the neck.
  1. hrych
    
    +28
    
    2 May 2018 07: 33
    
    So what? Yes let these mattresses sit there. Well, 30 thousand so what? For me, reducing the number of American military bases is not at hand for us, the main US military budget is spent on maintaining them, the American economy is not in the best condition due to the same Chinese, i.e. on the one hand, the base is a force projection mechanism, on the other, the Achilles heel. And to bang this base we have what. The main thing was the end of the Korean War, moreover, with Putin’s pipes and roads, and let the Americans watch how the cash flows from the Atlantic infrastructure of the Atlanteans go to land, land, to the New Silk Road through Russia.
    1. Vanek
      
      +9
      
      2 May 2018 08: 45
      
      Quote: hrych
      Well, 30 thousand so what? For me, reducing the number of American military bases is not at hand for us, the main military budget of the United States goes to its maintenance, the American economy is not in the best condition because of
      
      In the case of a mess, managing so many bases from phashington ... This ... It’s impossible to look at all the bases. Organization will not be due. A piece there, a piece here. And for some reason it may and, yes, it would be better if they stayed there ... Sooner or later, forever.
      1. Nyrobsky
        
        +8
        
        2 May 2018 11: 11
        
        Quote: Vanek
        In the case of a mess, managing so many bases from phashington ... This ... It’s impossible to look at all the bases. Organization will not be due. A piece there, a piece here. And for some reason it may and, yes, it would be better if they stayed there ... Sooner or later, forever.
        
        In the case of a mess, local cadres can also join in firing off American "rangers" like jerboas around the world. Then the United States will not have time to put the "rebels" in the stall - they will tear the navel.
    2. DEDPIHTO
      
      +8
      
      2 May 2018 08: 50
      
      Grunt, I have no words .. For you, any topic is the exaltation of the sun, even where the spirit was not there.Final!-
      The confrontation (including the frozen conflict) of the halves does not end until the mattresses are hosted in the South, where the leadership does not adhere to the idea of suicide ... or as an option, until Eun or his future change decides to merge the sovereignty of the country. The American contingent will not clean up voluntarily from the peninsula, and Eun will not dare to use weapons for this, however, like China in the near future.
      1. hrych
        
        +5
        
        2 May 2018 09: 08
        
        Quote: DEPHIHTO
        like China in the near future. Everything.
        
        There is not everything, wait for the publication of the results of the meeting of an economic nature and the light of the Sun will illuminate your dark nooks of the soul. If not completely engaged, then I would not deny that there is a confrontation throughout the Shar, in all regions. Where there is an open war, the proxies rather fight what is Syria, Donbass and Yemen, and where there is a fierce political battle, which naturally goes to the economy. So there are sanctions and attempts to prevent global economic projects that there are trade routes, including pipeline transport. Say, the connection between the events in Ukraine with the pipes and Syria with the pipes is unconditional. If you think not, then don’t.
      2. Arakius
        
        0
        
        8 May 2018 02: 14
        
        Quote: DEPHIHTO
        Grunt, I have no words .. For you, any topic is the exaltation of the sun, even where the spirit was not there.Final!-
        The confrontation (including the frozen conflict) of the halves does not end until the mattresses are hosted in the South, where the leadership does not adhere to the idea of suicide ... or as an option, until Eun or his future change decides to merge the sovereignty of the country. The American contingent will not clean up voluntarily from the peninsula, and Eun will not dare to use weapons for this, however, like China in the near future.
        
        You are not considering the option that Eun just decided to change the owner? China to the USA? From his point of view, this is trite profitable: sanctions will be lifted, South Korea will give money and technology. From the point of view of the United States, the unification of two Koreas into one large and powerful state is even more profitable: Korea will balance in Asia a growing China (which is South Korea’s direct competitor in world markets)
        
        The United States simply creates a new balance of power in Asia in which they will be the arbiter (because their bases in Korea and Japan will remain in place)
        
        onega67
        
        0
        
        8 May 2018 14: 03
        
        Korea will balance China? OH WELL!
        
        Arakius
        
        0
        
        8 May 2018 21: 06
        
        Together with other US allies: Japan, Australia, Malaysia, Vietnam (potentially). They will stop the expansion of China in Southeast Asia
        
        faradien
        
        0
        
        9 May 2018 22: 33
        
        Somehow you think narrowly, completely "at home" ... Eun will change the owner? And what remains of him? There are plenty of examples before our eyes, beginning with the collapse of the USSR, ending with the Iranian deal. Well, and at the expense of other allies and stopping the expansion of China - it’s completely "fly into space." Wishful thinking ...
    3. XXXIII
      
      +5
      
      2 May 2018 09: 22
      
      Quote: hrych
      So what? Yes let these mattresses sit there. Well, 30 thousand so what? For me, reducing the number of American military bases is not at hand for us, the main US military budget is spent on maintaining them, the American economy is not in the best condition due to the same Chinese, i.e. on the one hand, the base is a force projection mechanism, on the other, the Achilles heel. And to bang this base we have what. The main thing was the end of the Korean War, moreover, with Putin’s pipes and roads, and let the Americans watch how the cash flows from the Atlantic infrastructure of the Atlanteans go to land, land, to the New Silk Road through Russia.
      Strategist....
      
      Absolutely right, you all said, the bases are their weak point, in the case of a first strike or retaliatory, these bases will not be there until the arrival of the main forces ....
      1. Doliva63
        
        +9
        
        2 May 2018 11: 29
        
        Quote: XXXIII
        Quote: hrych
        So what? Yes let these mattresses sit there. Well, 30 thousand so what? For me, reducing the number of American military bases is not at hand for us, the main US military budget is spent on maintaining them, the American economy is not in the best condition due to the same Chinese, i.e. on the one hand, the base is a force projection mechanism, on the other, the Achilles heel. And to bang this base we have what. The main thing was the end of the Korean War, moreover, with Putin’s pipes and roads, and let the Americans watch how the cash flows from the Atlantic infrastructure of the Atlanteans go to land, land, to the New Silk Road through Russia.
        Strategist....
        
        Absolutely right, you all said, the bases are their weak point, in the case of a first strike or retaliatory, these bases will not be there until the arrival of the main forces ....
        
        Something I'm not sure that we have enough missiles for all their bases + their continent + fleet + allies. It’s more profitable for us to have a bunch of denser threads somewhere in one place — then we’ll cover it for sure, they’ll also remain in reserve
        
        Ased
        
        +3
        
        2 May 2018 13: 21
        
        Quote: Doliva63
        Something I'm not sure that we have enough missiles for all their bases + their continent + fleet + allies. It’s more profitable for us to have a bunch of denser threads somewhere in one place — then we’ll cover it for sure, they’ll also remain in reserve
        
        It is believed that in the event of a mess, their locals will beat. In any case, they will not voluntarily feed.
        And the problem of gathering all the adversaries in one place is with many military companies. Nobody wants to become a convenient target for a missile strike, since their time is so :).
        They will either hide peacefully, or break up into groups, unconscious.
        
        Someone from the fleet
        
        +1
        
        6 May 2018 23: 35
        
        Quote: Doliva63
        Something I'm not sure that we have enough missiles for all their bases + their continent + fleet + allies. It’s more profitable for us to have a bunch of denser threads somewhere in one place — then we’ll cover it for sure, they’ll also remain in reserve
        
        The main thing at the pack of jackals is to knock out the leader, the others, having tailed their tails, will scatter themselves.
      2. Anatoly R
        
        0
        
        2 May 2018 22: 07
        
        Famously said.
        And they base, like a dog’s fifth leg. Spitting on their bases is a consumable. They are all dead hostages there.
      3. faradien
        
        0
        
        9 May 2018 22: 37
        
        Quote: XXXIII
        these bases will be gone until the arrival of the main forces ....
        
        Yes, and no basic forces will be enough to send them to all attacked bases
    4. alex_V15
      
      +1
      
      2 May 2018 16: 29
      
      Well done!
  2. Orionvit
    
    +2
    
    2 May 2018 08: 31
    
    Quote: Bar1
    well what will happen?
    Drive them in the neck.
    
    You forget who is the master of the global financial system. This Russia may not care for all state sanctions, unlike South Korea, which was initially integrated into the world and western economies according to the glands. So, as the "senior" says, they will dance like that.
    1. hrych
      
      +3
      
      2 May 2018 10: 02
      
      Quote: Orionvit
      unlike South Korea, which was initially integrated into the global and western economies according to the glands.
      
      She completely depended on the sea, because The DPRK made it an island, all trade and the supply of energy and raw materials was only by sea. However, Korea cooperates well with the Russian Federation, this does not prevent it from supplying electronics and machinery to the Russian Federation, organizing production, etc. The Korean economy is the thirteenth in the world and it is the largest shipbuilder, as much as 45% of the global shipbuilding market, almost half. If it is integrated into overland trade and economic routes, its freed fleet will go to conquer America. they will also bring down shipping prices, to Europe our Transsiberian and BAM will get tired of sending trains with Korean goods
  3. Guillon
    
    0
    
    2 May 2018 09: 44
    
    The USA needs to be driven in the neck in order to set a precedent! You look later it’ll go, as if on the thumb!
  4. Geisenberg
    
    +1
    
    2 May 2018 13: 01
    
    Quote: Bar1
    well what will happen?
    Drive them in the neck.
    
    Rather, the Americans will drive them out of Korea))) from South to North)
  5. bazzbazz
    
    0
    
    2 May 2018 16: 23
    
    Well, these South Koreans are clowns! I hope Kim, something serious and cunning muddied up)
2. Captain Pushkin
  
  +2
  
  2 May 2018 09: 54
  
  Quote: arhPavel
  No one doubted, Germany is an example of this. Voluntarily US troops do not withdraw from anywhere. Only when they receive on the hill.
  
  At one time, from Libya, the Americans and the British, after Gaddafi came to power, flew like a traffic jam in a few months.
  1. rocket757
    
    +3
    
    2 May 2018 10: 42
    
    What will be, what will be ??? The southerners will have a new president! That's all for a short time!
    This must be fearless, a hero, Schaub answer striped NO!
    This was not found in the south, however, perhaps they do not need it ??? Their affairs, as you will understand.!
    1. dSK
      
      +1
      
      2 May 2018 12: 36
      
      Quote: rocket757
      This must be fearless, a hero, Schaub answer striped NO!
      Arrange a "sudden" funeral "how to give a drink." A pair of "night" shelling of unknown origin or the undermining of mined cars and a peace treaty will be postponed indefinitely.
3. sgazeev
  
  +1
  
  2 May 2018 16: 13
  
  Quote: arhPavel
  No one doubted, Germany is an example of this. Voluntarily US troops do not withdraw from anywhere. Only when they receive on the hill.
  
  Well, then the granddaughter of Kim Il Sung will breathe a sigh of relief.
4. Yrec
  
  0
  
  3 May 2018 10: 16
  
  South Korea is a country with limited sovereignty. There will be no peace treaty with S. Korea while the Yankees are on the peninsula, i.e. until the hegemon grunts.
Mountain shooter

+10

2 May 2018 07: 13

No, do not get out. We'll have to slowly “remove” the Americans from the “soft underbelly” of China. Once again I am convinced how smartly and subtly the Chinese play "long"! They set the goal of "squeezing out" the long-nosed barbarians from the "near zone" - and Squeezing out. They said - the South China Sea is Chinese, and the islands - their islands - well ...
I won’t be surprised that the DPRK passed the "nuclear map" ... China!
1. bouncyhunter
  
  +3
  
  2 May 2018 08: 07
  
  Eugene In other words, the next stage of political balancing act in the region has begun.
  1. novel66
    
    +3
    
    2 May 2018 09: 42
    
    Pasha, hi how soft you are!
    political balancing act
    ! leadership with reduced social responsibility, or rather will be
    1. bouncyhunter
      
      +1
      
      2 May 2018 17: 02
      
      Roma, good day! We have to find ways to convey their thoughts without breaking.
2. Captain Pushkin
  
  +2
  
  2 May 2018 09: 59
  
  Quote: Mountain Shooter
  
  6
  Mountain shooter (Eugene) Today, 07: 13 New
  No, do not get out. We'll have to slowly “remove” the Americans from the “soft underbelly” of China.
  
  Americans will not allow Koreans to unite. At least in the coming decades. I’m afraid that even a peace agreement between the Koreans in the Trump’s rule will not be allowed to be concluded.
  I would be glad to make a mistake.
  1. rocket757
    
    +2
    
    2 May 2018 10: 51
    
    Friends, good morning
    We ask ourselves, if Koreans, Chinese, Yankees, we can’t ask.
    And who needs PEACE in Korean ??? Who needs the integration process? And yet, who is the MAIN?
    My impression is that even if both main Koreans want to unite a divided people, the process will be at least a long one, if they haven’t ... been taken away from life! There are many and much to lose!
3. Ased
  
  0
  
  2 May 2018 13: 29
  
  Quote: Mountain Shooter
  I won’t be surprised that the DPRK passed the "nuclear map" ... China!
  
  Something too scanty map. That missile will fly off to the wrong place, it will cover the range ...
  Or write off the mentality of Koreans?
bsk_una

+2

2 May 2018 07: 20

Apparently, the southerners went through the kumpol strongly, their president did not expect that the Americans are capable of peace, but only on the conditions of P.I. Dosia. So it will not work out, because for them it is necessary to arrange a worldwide commotion to drape like from Vietnam. But the Koreans are not yet ready for such an event, the president’s life is still needed (according to the arrogant Saxons, the Russians have not yet poisoned him, or the Americans have not yet spoken, their dogs have no one to hang on like the Russians), so the president turned on the reverse gear.
1. Dashout
  
  +3
  
  2 May 2018 09: 27
  
  Quote: bsk_una
  so the president turned on the reverse gear.
  
  To promise is not to marry yet! Let the stripes soothe ...
  1. Mikhail3
    
    0
    
    2 May 2018 11: 02
    
    Only striped? Well, then ... Actually, that is, on the border of the two Koreas, there is a "contact room." Such a room, in which sometimes negotiations are held on local issues (and sometimes not local ones) and other small contacts. There is a north guard near one side of the room, guarding its door, and the south one on the other.
    So, from time to time the northern guard gets out of hand ... and captures one or two southern soldiers. In the spirit of frostbitten special forces. Sometimes they are given back. But often they don’t give it back ... Then the communication in the room freezes for years.
    In general, southerners are afraid, and rather reasonably afraid. The president did not include any of their backs; he needs all possible guarantees, that's all. By itself, South Korea does not represent anything at all, either militarily or economically. The Americans will take away their troops, instructors, management and investments from there, it will immediately turn out to be a rocky shore again, with mines and other developments that are not so easy to manage.
    It is unfortunate that more and more materials on the site are in the spirit of "ideological warfare" in its American sense - frantic propaganda without mind and imagination. This is not Alabama, in Russia it works poorly.
GLAVPUR

+4

2 May 2018 07: 24

Well, not everything is done right away. The USA is such a tick that a simpleton will not unhook!
rotmistr60

+5

2 May 2018 07: 24

US troops in Korea have nothing to do with signing a peace treaty with the North
Then the nuclear weapons of the DPRK have nothing to do with the treaty. RK behind the US found herself too cunning?
Dr. Hub

+5

2 May 2018 07: 43

Seoul does not decide anything. His army under the external control of the Pentagon
1. GLAVPUR
  
  +1
  
  2 May 2018 07: 51
  
  Quote: Dr. Hub
  Seoul does not decide anything. His army under the external control of the Pentagon
  
  All hope for Un with his nuclear club. US can squeeze Russia with China Koreans will certainly help! The main process of unification launched ..
  1. Dr. Hub
    
    0
    
    2 May 2018 08: 55
    
    Be realistic. Eun is losing ground, not Seoul. It is elementary that these are economically two disparate countries. Remember the fate of the GDR. And the States are not so simple to give this piece of the pie, where they have invested so much. If everything works out, it's a US missile defense a hundred kilometers from Vladivostok. And Eun may get sick with the outcome suddenly. And Pyongyang will not have a great helmsman, only rich elder brothers who will buy the top of the North with offal
    1. Captain Pushkin
      
      0
      
      2 May 2018 10: 11
      
      Quote: Dr. Hub
      
      0
      Dr. Hub (Dmitry) Today, 08:55 ↑ New
      Be realistic. Eun is losing ground, not Seoul. It’s elementary that these are economically two disparate countries
      
      Eun hasn’t passed anything yet. While he just waved the carrot, he hinted that he might give a try.
      The unification of Korea, a technically solvable process. Through the transformation of the DPRK economy along the Chinese model and the subsequent creation of a confederation. With the prospect of transforming into a federation, after conditions have matured. The process is not fast, but real.
      With an indispensable initial condition - the absence of Americans on the Korean peninsula. But how to push them? You need to start with a peace treaty between Korea. Without this, it will not be possible to push out. Therefore, the United States will block all attempts at a peace treaty.
1536

+2

2 May 2018 07: 48

Information for those who think that at the cost of Russian territories (the Kuril Islands, for example) will be finalized to retirement, and it is also possible to reason and make a militaristic state with foreign bases on its territory peaceful.
Although the "DPRK Gorbachev" will do anything to settle as soon as possible in Switzerland. Still, the best years of life have passed there, everything native, familiar. The Kuvolsans and Mantapsans in their homeland cannot be compared to Mount Matterhorn or Monte Tamaro.
This is also an example of how one person can take an entire country hostage.
Yak28

+3

2 May 2018 07: 48

Kim Jong-un doesn’t understand that friendship with Korea will not save him from the Americans, only the availability of nuclear weapons and good air defense can save him from the United States. Even if Kim Jong-un as Gorbachev betrays the country, abandons socialism and becomes a terry bourgeois. strong pressure on the SK, and will never withdraw their troops from anywhere.
bald

+1

2 May 2018 07: 52

Why immediately "back". The other day we agreed and that, immediately down with the base, it’s funny and not real. Even if they wanted to, this infection would be easily corrupted. Rapprochement processes will go, fucking complicated and how time will tell.
100500

+3

2 May 2018 08: 06

But do Americans really need rapprochement or God forbid the unification of Koreas? It seems to me that not really. And for sure, the northerners in the beginning process of establishing relations with the southerners will advance unacceptable requirements and conditions. It was smooth on paper, but forgot about the ravines.
thinker

+1

2 May 2018 08: 09

The funny thing is, this "protection" service by the US Army is paid.
Last year, the South Korean U.S. board amounted to about $ 896,5 million.

According to the Nikkei newspaper, this year (2016), Japan allocated about 760 billion yen (about $ 7,18 billion) on expenses associated with the deployment of US bases.
K-50

+3

2 May 2018 08: 11

No matter how Korea strives for a friendly mate, this is not profitable for pin dos. They do not need peace in Korea, near Russia and China. Therefore, any steps to establish relations between Koreas are doomed to failure, pin dosniks will not allow the "fire" to go out.
1. You Vlad
  
  +2
  
  2 May 2018 08: 22
  
  Quote: K-50
  They don’t need peace in Korea, near Russia and China
  
  Georgia and Ukraine have been prepared for us, and Korea for China! And they are working on it constantly. Pressure is always and everywhere, this is the key to promoting our own interests in the world.
2. Dormidont
  
  0
  
  2 May 2018 09: 18
  
  Be more careful with statements about the uselessness of our Western and Middle Eastern partners on peace on the Korean Peninsula. For such a statement, a warning came from some kind of abyrvalga
tank66

+1

2 May 2018 08: 51

To paraphrase a previously decent singer by mouth:
the dolls are pulled by the strings, they have smiles on their faces, - a thread goes into the distance over the ocean ..
Saratoga833

0

2 May 2018 08: 53

Eun holds on to the throne only because he has nuclear weapons! If he hadn’t existed, he would have long hung on an American rope like Hussein. And, in my opinion, ours was in vain led to sanctions against North Korea. They do not threaten us with anything. And Southerners will do only what America says, and nothing else!
1. Merold
  
  +2
  
  2 May 2018 09: 00
  
  Quote: Saratoga833
  Eun holds on to the throne only because he has nuclear weapons! If he hadn’t existed, he would have long hung on an American rope like Hussein. And, in my opinion, ours was in vain led to sanctions against North Korea. They do not threaten us with anything. And Southerners will do only what America says, and nothing else!
  
  And why did his dad stay on the throne without nuclear weapons?
2. onega67
  
  0
  
  8 May 2018 14: 06
  
  It is necessary to lift sanctions from the DPRK. It won’t be any worse!
Irek

+3

2 May 2018 09: 06
And it would be better ...
sib.ataman

0

2 May 2018 09: 09

Well, what to take from the pad? I suggested they stock up on diapers!
The comment was deleted.
Metallurg_2

0

2 May 2018 10: 00

And I thought he was protecting from "Russian aggression" ...
dojjdik

0

2 May 2018 10: 18

when the Britons and Jews move their bases to Vladivostok and China they will say that it’s done but not for long — however, Kim Jong himself is not good and makes an attempt to unite Korea under his patronage with the elimination of the Britons bases, which will not be easy.
wax

0

2 May 2018 10: 25

But who would doubt that: the Americans will never voluntarily surrender their base at the side of China. Well, the Americans also can not count on the absorption of the DPRK. So the zug-zwang for a long time.
APASUS

0

2 May 2018 10: 26

That's all and began to crawl out! And then the peace treaty, the unification plan, and wherever there. According to the old American habit, they will now begin to amend the agreements between the Koreans unilaterally, and of course UN will be to blame
Abram

+1

2 May 2018 10: 50

But how do American bases prevent progress in relations? stand themselves, do not touch anyone. They still, in 30 years, will protect Big Korea from Russian-Chinese threats)
Olegovi4

0

2 May 2018 11: 46

Naglosaksky style - change the rules on the go
BOPOH50

0

2 May 2018 13: 20

Quote: hrych
So what? Yes let these mattresses sit there. Well, 30 thousand so what? For me, reducing the number of American military bases is not at hand for us, the main US military budget is spent on maintaining them, the American economy is not in the best condition due to the same Chinese, i.e. on the one hand, the base is a force projection mechanism, on the other, the Achilles heel. And to bang this base we have what. The main thing was the end of the Korean War, moreover, with Putin’s pipes and roads, and let the Americans watch how the cash flows from the Atlantic infrastructure of the Atlanteans go to land, land, to the New Silk Road through Russia.

To do this, they are sitting there, so that there would be no peace anywhere, next terrorists will appear immediately, etc. etc. and one more arms sales channel and something stronger. One word is PEACEKEEPERS (they do whatever they want around the world).
Tatyana Arzamasova

0

2 May 2018 14: 47

ALIENS will never let the Koreans unite
Incvizitor

0

2 May 2018 15: 11

Does it make sense for the DPRK to "make friends" with those who host the likeness of ISIS?
NF68

0

2 May 2018 16: 27

The Americans will press Seoul and the South Korean leadership will dance to the tune of the Americans.
Evgenii Xolod

+1

2 May 2018 16: 40

Acquisition troops. Japan, Korea, Germany .......... What are you surprised ?????
Berkut24

0

2 May 2018 17: 06

So, the jurisdiction of countries and their real sovereignty become clearer.
TOR2

0

2 May 2018 20: 37

The South Korean media also added that Seoul relies on the American military contingent as a "guarantor of security on the peninsula in the conditions of neighborhood with such a state as China." That is, now they begin to link the stay of Americans in the Republic of Korea with “protection from China”?

Well, this is closer to reality. and then sentiments of peace, friendship, pants with hieroglyphs. They will not even succeed in confederation.
Anatoly R

0

2 May 2018 22: 12

Quote: Orionvit
Quote: Bar1
well what will happen?
Drive them in the neck.

You forget who is the master of the global financial system. This Russia may not care for all state sanctions, unlike South Korea, which was initially integrated into the world and western economies according to the glands. So, as the "senior" says, they will dance like that.

This is - the Korean hostages, the dead in an embrace with the bases of amers.
gukoyan

0

3 May 2018 13: 39

I will not be surprised at any provocation in any of Korea, their rapprochement and friendship is not beneficial to America.
tun5t

0

4 May 2018 14: 10

Everyone who shows their true face under the sly (Kali) is at this stage the most important thing to find out who is who, so Kadyrov spoke about the true face in his time, truth is still the most important thing in the war
komis55

0

5 May 2018 06: 01

Well, I don’t know right away, but if you can give a recognizance not to leave.
Vasya Pupkin

0

6 May 2018 00: 16

The US military base is a proud bird. Flies only after a powerful kick.
Vanych

0

6 May 2018 08: 23

the betrayer will betray the second
zibo1668

0

6 May 2018 11: 53

America is no longer able to protect not only allies, which, however, she never did, but also herself.
maikl50jrij

0

6 May 2018 20: 46

Well, it’s already at all ... Although it was expected that the Americans would not surrender Korea so easily.
The comment was deleted.