Military Review

Plus four. Party Su-30SM entered the ZVO air regiment

84
Four Su-30CM fighters replenished the air regiment of the Western Military District, stationed near Kursk, the district press service reported.


Plus four. Party Su-30SM entered the ZVO air regiment


The fighter pilots of the aviation regiment of the Western Military District, stationed in the Kursk Region, this year received the first batch of the Su-4CM multi-purpose fighter “30 +” generation. Four aircraft were taken at the factory in Irkutsk and flew more than 5 thousand kilometers.
- said in a statement

The press service clarified that the arriving Su-30CM aircraft were received to replace the MiG-29CMT fighters in service with the regiment.

The Su-30CM twin multipurpose super-maneuverable fighter is a further development of the Su-30MKI and the latest modification of the base Su-30. It has been modified in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on armament, radar systems, communications and identification systems, and other equipment. The first contracts for the supply of Su-30CM Russian army were concluded in 2012 year. The aircraft is designed to gain air superiority, block enemy airfields at great depth, destroy air, ground and sea targets.

Photos used:
http://army-news.ru/
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov April 30 2018 10: 56
    +3
    Not enough men! Well, at such a pace, we will not be able to defend Russia soon!
    And we have been surrounded for a long time, here in Syria we just hold on .. And if you have to leave?
    1. svp67
      svp67 April 30 2018 11: 03
      +8
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Not enough men! Well, at such a pace, we will not be able to defend Russia soon!

      Calm, only calm ... for this year, according to the Su-30, we have:
      “This year the volume of the production program is only 24 aircraft: 10 Yak-130 aircraft, 12 aircraft for the aerospace forces and 2 for the Navy - Su-30SM "
      That is, only ESCADRIL, four have already arrived, it remains to wait eight more
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov April 30 2018 11: 18
        +2
        Quote: svp67
        Calm, only calm ... for this year, according to the Su-30, we have:

        Well, God forbid Sergey, otherwise it’s disturbing as it were in my soul ... soldier
        1. svp67
          svp67 April 30 2018 11: 20
          +7
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Well, God forbid Sergey, otherwise it’s disturbing as it were in my soul ...

          The main thing is that anxiety would not panic ...
      2. figwam
        figwam April 30 2018 11: 31
        +3
        Quote: svp67
        Calm, only calm ...

        In the event of a serious war, what we do for a year will be lost in a day and we will simply be left without aviation.
        1. svp67
          svp67 April 30 2018 11: 32
          +20
          Quote: figvam
          In the event of a serious war, what we do all year will be lost in a day.

          In the event of a serious war, everything that humanity built and did, for millennia, will be lost in an hour.
          1. figwam
            figwam April 30 2018 11: 43
            +3
            svp67

            What does a nuclear conflict have to do with it? Judging by your logic, a nuclear war was supposed to happen either in Korea or in Vietnam, but for some reason this did not happen although losses in aviation reached several thousand aircraft.
            1. svp67
              svp67 April 30 2018 11: 49
              +7
              Quote: figvam
              What does a nuclear conflict have to do with it?

              And despite the fact that today's Russia is not the USSR
              Quote: figvam
              Judging by your logic, a nuclear war was supposed to happen either in Korea or in Vietnam, but for some reason this did not happen although losses in aviation reached several thousand aircraft.

              Judging by this statement, you do not understand the difference between the USSR and its military community - the Warsaw Pact, in the confrontation between the United States and NATO countries, and the confrontation between present-day Russia and NATO countries.
              1. figwam
                figwam April 30 2018 12: 09
                +1
                svp67

                In my opinion, we are just talking about the capabilities of the Russian military-industrial complex, which, compared with the USSR, at least in aviation, are insufficient for a serious conflict. In the USSR, several regiments (30–40 regiments) of fighters and bombers and helicopters were updated over the year. Only such a pace can close possible losses.
                1. svp67
                  svp67 April 30 2018 12: 27
                  +3
                  Quote: figvam
                  In the USSR, several regiments (30–40 regiments) of fighters and bombers and helicopters were updated over the year. Only such a pace can close possible losses.

                  Means present Russia IS WHERE TO GROW ...
      3. poquello
        poquello April 30 2018 13: 38
        +1
        Quote: svp67
        Calm, only calm ...

        ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
      4. Nevsky_ZU
        Nevsky_ZU April 30 2018 14: 47
        +1
        An interesting video about the new Su-30sm and their supplies to the VCS:

    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith April 30 2018 11: 08
      +10
      Specifically for the Su-30:
      Sioux 30SM 108
      Sioux 30M2 20

      But do not forget about other fighter interceptors:
      Su-27 119
      Su-30 128
      Su-35 70
      MiG-29 120
      MiG-31 150
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov April 30 2018 11: 19
        +4
        Thank you, Sergei, at least a little reassured .. And then the "comrade" I was harassed and there is nothing to answer them .. soldier
      2. _Ugene_
        _Ugene_ April 30 2018 11: 58
        +2
        In total, about 700 fighters, of which 300 are modern with a stretch, the United States has about 3 thousand fighters, not to mention drones. So the United States does not fight alone, in which case they are actively attracting other NATO countries, hence the conclusion is that only nuclear weapons are our only guarantor, in all other weapons we can not compete not only with NATO but also with the United States, and this is not necessary , Russia is not the USSR. All of our non-nuclear weapons for local conflicts with countries outside the NATO bloc, only which are interesting
        1. Muvka
          Muvka April 30 2018 12: 01
          +3
          And how many of them are modern and on alert? And keep in mind that they have many bases around the world, from where they can’t just take and hijack aviation, and also use air defense systems, which we have many times more than the Americans.
          1. _Ugene_
            _Ugene_ April 30 2018 12: 05
            +2
            And how many of them are modern and on alert?
            about 1600, and we have 300
            with any exaggeration and assumptions, we won’t be able to resist on equal terms for too long, forces are not equal, and this is not surprising - after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the army collapsed so long and zealously that there was almost nothing left, I had no reason to damn nuclear weapons and thanks for that
            1. Lord of the Sith
              Lord of the Sith April 30 2018 12: 38
              +4
              That's right, they have a combat readiness of 54% of 3000 (approximately), totaling about 1600 (approximately).
              But do not forget that this is reasoning on the couch. Since Russia has the concept of defense and if there will be military operations, it’s under the dome of our air defense. And the United States and NATO will need to deploy 1600 + 700-800 NATO fighters at European airfields. And there are not so many of them.
              1. _Ugene_
                _Ugene_ April 30 2018 15: 42
                +2
                NATO bases are on all sides, and NATO has 15 more aircraft carriers. You look at the map, at such a huge country as we really need several thousand modern combat-ready aircraft, because in case of an attack it is unrealistic to quickly overtake all planes to the place of conflict, the distances are not the same. Look, for example, at Israel. The area of ​​the whole country is about 21 thousand km², it is 2 times smaller than the Moscow region or 815 times smaller than the Russian Federation. So they have about 400 combat-ready aircraft. Our aviation for such a country is just tears.
                1. Pollux
                  Pollux April 30 2018 19: 16
                  +1
                  Quote: _Ugene_
                  Look, for example, at Israel. The area of ​​the whole country is about 21 thousand km², it is 2 times smaller than the Moscow region or 815 times smaller than the Russian Federation. So they have about 400 combat-ready aircraft.

                  Most of them are F-16s, which on the Su-30 need to be sent ten on one.
                  1. Shahno
                    Shahno April 30 2018 19: 31
                    0
                    Oh well .... So you threw ...
                  2. ZVO
                    ZVO 2 May 2018 22: 48
                    0
                    Quote: Pollux
                    Quote: _Ugene_
                    Look, for example, at Israel. The area of ​​the whole country is about 21 thousand km², it is 2 times smaller than the Moscow region or 815 times smaller than the Russian Federation. So they have about 400 combat-ready aircraft.

                    Most of them are F-16s, which on the Su-30 need to be sent ten on one.

                    write at once 100 pieces.

                    And at the same time study the statistics of air battles of the "aggressor" on F-16. against the F-18 (no different in flight characteristics of combat aircraft from the Su-30) and F-15 ...
                  3. _Ugene_
                    _Ugene_ 4 May 2018 13: 01
                    0
                    do not write nonsense, planes of the same class, each has its own pros and cons, in general, approximately the same, and the avionics of the Jews is much more advanced
                    1. Pollux
                      Pollux 5 May 2018 20: 03
                      0
                      Quote: _Ugene_
                      do not write nonsense, planes of the same class, each has its own pros and cons, in general, approximately the same, and the avionics of the Jews is much more advanced

                      Aircraft of the same class are Dryers against the F-15, F-16, F-18, as well as the Mig-29 class below.
            2. Muvka
              Muvka April 30 2018 13: 22
              0
              Quote: _Ugene_
              And how many of them are modern and on alert?
              about 1600, and we have 300
              with any exaggeration and assumptions, we won’t be able to resist on equal terms for too long, forces are not equal, and this is not surprising - after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the army collapsed so long and zealously that there was almost nothing left, I had no reason to damn nuclear weapons and thanks for that

              And how many modern ones do they have? Is it really all 1600?
              1. Lord of the Sith
                Lord of the Sith April 30 2018 14: 06
                +2
                That no, of course
                1. Muvka
                  Muvka April 30 2018 14: 21
                  +1
                  Well, this is an old tablet. 29 Su-34. Now there are more planes and a newer fleet)
                  1. Lord of the Sith
                    Lord of the Sith April 30 2018 14: 32
                    +2
                    2013 nameplate. And it is not for the quantity, but for the age of the aircraft.
                2. DarkMatter
                  DarkMatter April 30 2018 14: 41
                  +2
                  This tablet is not old, but delusional. It seems to have been discussed earlier here. For example, what is the line Mig29SMT 255 pieces? What's this?! Su-27SM 307 what is this figure? Pieces? !! What are 3-4 years old?

                  Lord of the Sith
                  MiG-29 120

                  Where from? I doubt that even with deck there will be a hundred in total.
                  1. Lord of the Sith
                    Lord of the Sith April 30 2018 14: 47
                    0
                    I brought another one below, but this one really has a lot of mistakes.
                3. andrey-ivanov
                  andrey-ivanov April 30 2018 14: 42
                  +1
                  Some kind of crafty table at the Sith. belay Since when is the Su-27SM a new aircraft with an age of 3-4 years ??? Machines 25-30 years old, repaired, slightly modernized for the use of R-77 missiles and, in general, that's all. Where does the 255 (!!!) MiG-29SMT come from ??? Where is the 27 A-50? belay
                  1. Lord of the Sith
                    Lord of the Sith April 30 2018 14: 46
                    0
                    I agree with her a lot of questions.
                    There is another.
                    1. DarkMatter
                      DarkMatter April 30 2018 15: 02
                      +2


                      Official statistics on the current state of the US air force from the departmental edition of the United States Air Force - Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Overview, released in May 2018, outlining the US Air Force budget request for fiscal year 2018 (started on October 1, 2017).

                      But do not forget about the US Navy aviation with their F / A-18, which are not included in the lists of the Air Force.
      3. 320423
        320423 April 30 2018 13: 21
        0
        I don’t understand, the modification of "SMT" in "29" is the most modern of those in service, why then change them? and by the way 120 "29" are going to upgrade, who knows about this?
    3. midivan
      midivan April 30 2018 11: 22
      +8
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Not enough men! Well, at such a pace, we are not soon we can defend Russia!

      And that they have already bent us and trample the boot of our enemy? Rather than planes, rather flyers, it’s not enough, the plane is built faster than the pilot learns. Well, there are hundreds of them, and who will fly, or am I mistaken and our flyers stagger idle and earn extra money by pollinating fields on corn stands? what
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather April 30 2018 11: 34
        +5
        Quote: midivan
        Rather than planes, rather fewer flyers, the plane is built faster than the pilot learns. Well, there are hundreds of them, and who will fly, or I'm wrong

        true saint, the pilot must not be "released", it must be "done." and this is piece.
    4. Ustin
      Ustin April 30 2018 13: 10
      0
      How many orders so much and M.O. The pace is quite satisfactory, Su-30 cm in the troops is already more than a hundred and still "not evening."
    5. vladasyar
      vladasyar April 30 2018 16: 52
      +1
      How many military aircraft does Russia have? The approximate figure is 1614 units of air force equipment. These are 80 strategic bombers, and 150 long-range bombers, 241 attack aircraft, etc.

      That was on Jan. 2017 Today is much more
  2. svp67
    svp67 April 30 2018 11: 00
    +5
    This year, fighter pilots of the aviation regiment of the Western military district deployed in the Kursk region received the first batch of multi-role fighters of the 4+ generation Su-30SM.
    I can imagine how this will be perceived in Ukraine ....
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter April 30 2018 11: 05
      +4
      Sergey, welcome! hi
      Quote: svp67
      how it will be perceived in Ukraine ....

      As an extra reason to shout about aggressive Russia and ask for money to protect against achressor.
      1. svp67
        svp67 April 30 2018 11: 07
        +1
        Paul. hi
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        As an extra reason

        Exactly....
      2. midivan
        midivan April 30 2018 11: 31
        +1
        Quote: svp67
        I can imagine how this will be perceived in Ukraine ....

        Quote: bouncyhunter
        As an extra reason to shout about aggressive Russia and ask for money to protect against achressor.

        Greetings brothers hi ! Yes, the horses are completely calm, plasticine planes can not be a danger to the space fleet of the Almighty Ukraine! The other day I saw in YouTube authoritative posts of analysts on a spring, they definitely will not lie
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter April 30 2018 11: 56
          +2
          Vania ! hi Over time, clown performances simply stop responding (especially if the repertoire is the same).
    2. Grandfather
      Grandfather April 30 2018 11: 38
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      I can imagine how this will be perceived in Ukraine ....

      Quote: bouncyhunter
      As an extra reason to shout about aggressive Russia and ask for money to protect against achressor.

      Quote: svp67
      Exactly....

      Quote: bouncyhunter
      As an extra reason to shout about aggressive Russia and ask for money to protect against achressor

      Yes, nothing friends ... Outskirts, there is no aviation, no problem ... those flying specimens are more likely symbolic for the "puppeteer wenches", they probably have "letaki". but in essence ... zero.
      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter April 30 2018 11: 45
        +2
        hi So for the skakuas, no reason is needed for screaming, but here is such an opportunity! How not to grunt to remind yourself?
  3. XXXIII
    XXXIII April 30 2018 11: 10
    +2
    The press service clarified that the arriving Su-30CM aircraft were received to replace the MiG-29CMT fighters in service with the regiment.
    And where will I put the MiG-29SMT ?! what

    1. The war in Afghanistan (1979-1989)
    2. The Gulf War (1991)
    3. The conflict in Transnistria (1991-1992)
    4. Ethiopo-Eritrean War (1998-2000)
    5. NATO operation against Yugoslavia (1999)
    6. Kargil war (1999)
    7. The war in South Ossetia (2008)
    8. The conflict in Darfur (2003 — present)
    The 9th Civil War in Syria (2011 — present)
    On May 20, 1989, Captain Alexander Zuev, having lulled colleagues with a cake with sleeping pills and injuring a sentry from a service weapon, hijacked the MiG-29. Later, breaking away from the persecution, he landed in Turkey. The plane, in order to avoid a conflict situation, was returned to the USSR, the pilot received political asylum in the United States. Subsequently, Zuev wrote the autobiographical book "Fulcrum: A Top Gun Pilot's Escape from the Soviet Empire" and died in 2001 in a plane crash in the United States.
    1. UAZ 452
      UAZ 452 April 30 2018 11: 24
      +3
      the pilot received political asylum in the United States. Subsequently, Zuev wrote the autobiographical book "Fulcrum: A Top Gun Pilot's Escape from the Soviet Empire" and died in 2001 in a plane crash in the United States.

      Not just a newcomer ... But it should be so - the life of a traitor should be hard and short.
      1. Thrall
        Thrall April 30 2018 12: 09
        +1
        Quote: UAZ 452
        Not a newbie single ...

        Yak-52 killed him
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII April 30 2018 12: 50
          +2
          Quote: Thrall
          Quote: UAZ 452
          Not a newbie single ...

          Yak-52 killed him

          Even airplanes do not forgive traitors ... laughing
    2. svp67
      svp67 April 30 2018 11: 35
      +1
      Quote: XXXIII
      And where will I put the MiG-29SMT ?!

      Unlike Su, MiGs are NOT RELEASED here, but they are operated, and therefore require, over time, replacements. So choose which is better. Get new Su or stay completely without combat aircraft.
      1. XXXIII
        XXXIII April 30 2018 12: 47
        +1
        Quote: svp67
        MIGS ARE NOT RELEASED

        And where is it released? what
        Quote: svp67
        So choose which is better.

        New ones, it’s clear what is needed, but written off somewhere, back to metal? ...
        1. svp67
          svp67 April 30 2018 13: 02
          +1
          Quote: XXXIII
          but written off somewhere, back to the metal? ...

          Well, part of the museum ...
          1. XXXIII
            XXXIII April 30 2018 13: 12
            +1
            Quote: svp67
            Well, part of the museum ...

            Damn picture from a horror movie ... belay
            It seems that many countries exploit it, although it is only Eritrea that has such a modification - 4 MiG-29, 2 MiG-29UB and 2 MiG-29SMT, as of 2016. You can sell them at least for bananas .... laughing
            1. svp67
              svp67 April 30 2018 13: 20
              +1
              Quote: XXXIII
              Damn picture from a horror movie ...

              Well, which one they brought. Later I’ll go and see what happened ...
              The MiG-27 was delivered at its best ...
      2. tomket
        tomket April 30 2018 23: 54
        0
        Quote: svp67
        Unlike Su, MiGs are NOT RELEASED, but are operated

        Excuse me, but MiG-29К, MiG-29СМТ probably came to us from the moon? And the MiG-29M2 for Egypt, and the MiG-35?
        1. svp67
          svp67 1 May 2018 03: 54
          0
          Quote: tomket
          Sorry,
          Yes, what problems, come in.
          Quote: tomket
          and the MiG-29K, MiG-29SMT probably came to us from the moon? And the MiG-29M2 for Egypt, and the MiG-35?
          And do not tell me when the last arrival of the MiG "not from the moon" in our VKS was. And in what quantity?
  4. Storming the Washington
    Storming the Washington April 30 2018 11: 20
    +2
    and what is so much right away? And we will support the deripaska for which cones? Think where the money is wasted
  5. UAZ 452
    UAZ 452 April 30 2018 11: 27
    +1
    Still, I would like to clarify: where will the MIG-29SMT go? If in the scrap - why upgraded? And if it was decided to get rid of light fighters in favor of heavy ones, then why was it worth spending money on the MIG-35 program?
    1. DenZ
      DenZ April 30 2018 11: 33
      +1
      Your first question, address min. defense. The MIG-35 program continues, everything is in order.
    2. jaroff
      jaroff April 30 2018 11: 36
      +2
      You yourself answered your own question. Spent money in order to spend it.
    3. svp67
      svp67 April 30 2018 11: 36
      +1
      Quote: UAZ 452
      then why was it spending money on the MIG-35 program?

      Unfortunately, it takes time for the "promotion", and the "dry" is already on the stream
    4. NN52
      NN52 April 30 2018 12: 53
      0
      In fact, Mig 29 SMT is not so much ....
      They will find use for them ...
  6. Redfox3k
    Redfox3k April 30 2018 11: 41
    +2
    Few? Given that the Kursk Aviation Regiment is already armed with the Su-30SM, I saw how flying in pairs, beauty, it’s quite normal. Although it is strange that the replacement of the Mig-29SMT is a perfectly suitable aircraft. I think that all the same, it’s just a replacement for the Mig-29S, which is really outdated, not the SMT.
  7. san4es
    san4es April 30 2018 12: 59
    +3
    hi The first flight of the Su-30SM took place on September 21, 2012. At the end of the same year, the aircraft was adopted. The combat load of the Su-30SM fighter is 8 thousand kg. The aircraft has twelve suspension units on which a wide range of missile and bomb weapons can be placed. This can be six guided missiles for conducting air combat at medium or short distances, unguided bombs weighing 500 or 250 kg, containers with NAR. In addition to missile and bomb weapons, the aircraft is equipped with a 30-mm gun GS-30-1.
    length - 21,9 m;
    height - 6,36 m;
    poppy. take-off weight - 34500 kg;
    Max. speed - 2125 km / h;
    combat radius of action - 1500 km.
    crew - 2 people;
    weapons - 30-mm gun GSH-30-1, missile weapons;
    total number of suspension points - 12;
    full combat load - 8000 kg.
    The protection of the Su-30SM is based on the suppression of enemy radars using a powerful on-board electronic warfare system. The aircraft are equipped with electronic warfare systems "Sorption" and "Khibiny", which are able to suppress not only the relatively low-power radar of fighters, but also to neutralize ground-based radar systems. soldier
  8. Altona
    Altona April 30 2018 13: 34
    +2
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Not enough men! Well, at such a pace, we will not be able to defend Russia soon!

    -------------------------------------
    Vitaly, do not worry. Now I’ll throw you a positive. Bear in mind that Russia has not yet come to war with them, but they are already pouring in. wink laughing laughing lol
  9. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 30 2018 13: 38
    0
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Not enough men! Well, at such a pace, we will not be able to defend Russia soon!
    And we have been surrounded for a long time, here in Syria we just hold on .. And if you have to leave?


    They are driven to replace decommissioned. 29 matches will be played, and will be presented to brothers. We again have a lot of them recruited today.
  10. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek April 30 2018 13: 58
    0
    Production capacity of 15pcs / year for each plant. The only way out in unification is instead of Su34 ... Su30SM. They are much more versatile given the presence of a hanging container ..
  11. Vadim Golubkov
    Vadim Golubkov April 30 2018 14: 02
    0
    Few. few, 100 a year minimum. I calculated, of course, you will laugh that to close our territory, at least 1500 fighters are needed including the rear and air defense .. This is a minimum. For comfort, you need 2000-2500, and we have 700 fighters, and those who fly, who do not fly.
  12. Vadim Golubkov
    Vadim Golubkov April 30 2018 14: 15
    0
    Maybe not in the subject, the SU-30 is like the SU-27? Here is an article Drying won with Indian pilots 9-1 https://theaviationist.com/2014/05/02/cope-india-
    2004-results /
  13. Altona
    Altona April 30 2018 15: 08
    0
    Quote: Vadim Golubkov
    I calculated, of course, you will laugh that to close our territory, at least 1500 fighters are needed including the rear and air defense .. This is a minimum.

    -----------------------------
    Where are so many more people to fly into pilots and mechanics?
    1. ZVO
      ZVO 2 May 2018 22: 52
      0
      Quote: Altona
      Quote: Vadim Golubkov
      I calculated, of course, you will laugh that to close our territory, at least 1500 fighters are needed including the rear and air defense .. This is a minimum.

      -----------------------------
      Where are so many more people to fly into pilots and mechanics?


      Americans are gaining.

      1500 pilots per year production of only naval aviation ...
  14. d1975
    d1975 April 30 2018 15: 18
    +1
    Quote: figvam
    svp67

    What does a nuclear conflict have to do with it? Judging by your logic, a nuclear war was supposed to happen either in Korea or in Vietnam, but for some reason this did not happen although losses in aviation reached several thousand aircraft.

    It is necessary to introduce a progressive tax, I work I get 18, a tax of 100%, someone 13 and also 50% is not good. Where to get money, plus bureaucrats to shell out here and everything will be fine. (((((
    1. Praetorian4
      Praetorian4 April 30 2018 15: 59
      +3
      Do you consider 50 thousand big money if you offer a progressive tax in such a small range? I would understand 200-300 thousand income. But 50? Seriously?
  15. Znayka
    Znayka April 30 2018 22: 44
    +1
    On the night of April 29-30, a massive air strike was inflicted on Aleppo and Hama, unfortunately, in this case, the Syrian air defense could not resist it ... The only question is why, at Military Review, this is not gu-gu .. ???
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 April 30 2018 22: 47
      +1
      Quote: Znayka
      -Why on the "Military Review" about this no gu-gu .. ???

      This is not kosher ... crying
    2. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack April 30 2018 22: 49
      0
      Quote: Znayka
      why on "Military Review" about this neither gu-gu .. ???

      And exactly - not a single gu? wink
    3. Znayka
      Znayka April 30 2018 23: 07
      0
      The blow, in particular, was struck at the Iranian base Jabel, located just 40 km from the Russian base Khmeimim ... On which are now the S-300, S-400, Pantsir and even Tor-M2 "... The question is, what was this air defense doing at the time of the strike ???
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack April 30 2018 23: 26
        0
        Quote: Znayka
        What did this air defense do at the time of the strike?

        Guarded the base of the Russian Aerospace Forces. As it is, in fact, it should be.
        Protect the Persians there no one subscribed yes
        1. Znayka
          Znayka April 30 2018 23: 40
          0
          That is, they “gouge” the army of B. Assad with air strikes, they will smash the Iranian units, and we will all guard seven by five km. In “Khmeimim” ??? Maybe, then it’s better to just withdraw the troops and not disgrace?
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack April 30 2018 23: 54
            +1
            Quote: Znayka
            Maybe then it’s better just to withdraw the troops and not to disgrace?

            Output. And do not disgrace.
            I didn’t sign up to teach children literacy here stop
            1. Znayka
              Znayka 1 May 2018 00: 06
              0
              The question was not raised about literacy, but about specific actions ...
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack 1 May 2018 00: 09
                0
                Quote: Znayka
                about specific actions ...

                Here is the link, I just answered the same almost question.

                Gaps in the line breaks - remove with your hands. This is the site here ... such laughing
        2. tomket
          tomket April 30 2018 23: 57
          0
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          Guarded the base of the Russian Aerospace Forces. As it is, in fact, it should be.
          Protect the Persians there no one subscribed

          It’s just that someone doesn’t want to bring down kosher gays, but he doesn’t give a command.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 1 May 2018 00: 06
            0
            Quote: tomket
            It’s just that someone doesn’t want to bring down kosher gays, and he’s not giving a command

            Why shoot them down? Just out of sporting interest, and because you don’t like them like that?