Before the coming of the world. NATO is not going to leave Afghanistan

30
The contingent of the NATO mission will be present in Afghanistan at the request of the government until peace is established in that country, said NATO Deputy Assistant Secretary General for Operations John Manza on Monday.

Before the coming of the world. NATO is not going to leave Afghanistan




We will be there for as long as the Afghan government asks us, or before the country establishes a world with which everyone will agree.
- Manza said in an interview with the news agency "Jahon" at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Uzbekistan.

Manza said the alliance is committed to continuing the mission in Afghanistan and last year increased the number and type of troops deployed in that country.

Last Friday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg told reporters that the member countries of the alliance offered to send thousands of troops to 1,5 in Afghanistan. According to the Secretary General, at present, the contingent of the NATO non-combat mission in Afghanistan numbers 16 thousands of military

At the same time, two explosions occurred in Kabul on Monday morning. According to media reports, the first explosion was carried out by a suicide bomber on a motorcycle. As reported by the Pazhvak agency, among the dead and injured in the second explosion are journalists from TOLOnews, 1TV and Al Jazeera and other media. Agence France-Presse reported the death of photographer Sha Marai (Shah Marai).

As a result of two explosions, a 21 man was killed, another 27 was injured, reports 1TV channel referring to the country's ministry of health, RIA reports News
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 30 2018 09: 15
    The production of drugs for Europe and the distribution of income from them require force support ...
    1. +2
      April 30 2018 09: 18
      That's for sure ... I wrote several times already, if the United States is already falling apart, etc. Their military bases in Afghanistan will resist until the last soldier! wassat The wonderful valley of Afghanistan!
      1. +3
        April 30 2018 09: 41
        if traffic has grown 40 times, is it meaning to quit "fishing"? some say that the "conspiracy theory" is a tale.
        1. +1
          April 30 2018 09: 53
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          if traffic has grown 40 times, is it meaning to quit "fishing"? some say that the "conspiracy theory" is a tale.

          On this money from heroin in Afghanistan, ISIS financed (pork skins instead of coverlets))) Chechnya also fought with Russia for this money, etc.
          In the days of the USSR, the CIA repeatedly caught these deals .. Now it’s even worse, it’s not customary to say it openly .. Here’s a map of Afghanistan from space .. It’s nice, really guys? he he
    2. +2
      April 30 2018 10: 15
      Quote: Spade
      The production of drugs for Europe and the distribution of income from them require force support ...

      RT Doc went to the poppy fields, where they collect death, to find out why no one can put an end to this deadly trade.
      When it comes to heroin, a laissez-faire policy is still strong in Afghanistan, where more than 90% of the world's opium is produced. Most find their way into the international drug and profit market for organized crime funds and terrorist groups such as ISIS, which is growing in power here.
      Dealers and manufacturers are not hard to find: they live in luxurious homes, have fields blooming with poppies, and sell their drugs in broad daylight. However, they still manage to avoid being arrested. Poppy fields are destroyed and drugs are seized, but only average people are punished, not drug lords. NATO's military presence in the country has been around for 14 years, but drug production continues to grow. am
      Oct 19 2015 year
  2. +2
    April 30 2018 09: 16
    , or before a peace is established in the country, with which all will agree

    Whom do they want to intimidate? Convince?
    In Afghanistan, they’ll rip their navel and tear!
  3. +2
    April 30 2018 09: 21
    Where will they go from their heroin.
    1. +3
      April 30 2018 10: 31
      Quote: Rostislav
      Where will they go from their heroin.

      What is true is true - as long as pineapples with square eyes grow on poppy fields, American "agronomists" will definitely not go anywhere.
    2. +1
      April 30 2018 11: 24
      Quote: Rostislav
      Where will they go from their heroin.


      Afghanistan is important to them strategically, like a military base. Between Afghanistan and Iraq lies Iran. It is also convenient against the former southern countries of the USSR, then the Russian Federation. In the east, near China.
      And heroin is a cookie for the locals, that is, it made it easy to earn money. In this way, loyalty is bought. Very proud people. At one time, the British knew this.
  4. +1
    April 30 2018 09: 27
    Before the coming of the world. NATO is not going to leave Afghanistan

    An interesting phrase: How can peace come in Afghanistan if there are American troops, not American builders, businessmen, doctors, namely the troops.
    1. +3
      April 30 2018 10: 14
      Another excuse from mattresses sewn with white threads. They ARE NOT GOING TO LEAVE - the feeder is too greasy.
      NATO mission contingent to be present in Afghanistan at government request

      Who would doubt it: the mongrels asked the owner not to leave and he “generously” agreed.
    2. +1
      April 30 2018 10: 25
      Quote: APASUS
      Interesting phrase

      It is key here, because they themselves are not interested in this. This means never, or when they themselves consider it necessary. Well, or when the Afghans get tired of putting up with it, and they just break it in. Don't pamper at all. And they can.
  5. +1
    April 30 2018 09: 32
    do not voluntarily leave this country smile only if well asked bully but the Afghans seem to be good with NATO
    1. +2
      April 30 2018 10: 26
      Quote: Storming the Washington DCs
      NATO mission contingent will be present in Afghanistan at the request of the government until peace is established in that country

      states not from one country voluntarily do not leave ... Afghanistan is no exception ...
      1. +2
        April 30 2018 10: 50
        Marisha hi
        Quote: Masya Masya
        states not from one country do not voluntarily leave

        So they, and from where they are being driven out, leave with constant looking around and looking for reasons to stay. Or come back if you still kicked out.
  6. +2
    April 30 2018 09: 46
    Quote: Rostislav
    Where will they go from their heroin.

    Bees versus honey! Thousands of tons of heroin, because it’s a huge amount of money, how to quit such wealth. But you can’t take out so much smuggling, the neighbors are extremely against it. I’m thinking about the possibility of the American contingent! hi
  7. +2
    April 30 2018 10: 04
    NATO is not going to leave Afghanistan am
    Feb 27 2013 year
  8. 0
    April 30 2018 10: 14
    Have they been asked? belay It’s a pity we have with finances not so freely. It was possible for us to equip local gangs through packs "to fight the infidels," as the pins and their hangers-on did against us. what
  9. 0
    April 30 2018 10: 15
    NATO mission contingent will be present in Afghanistan at the request of the government until peace is established in that country

    That is, in fact, forever "settled."
    A government that wants to get rid of NATO’s presence in Afghanistan will simply not be allowed to come to power. The one who will support the pin occupation will always occupy the pos.
    Again, as long as the pin boards are present, peace will not come, since they are the main "stoker of war".
    Remove the invaders and then I think our diplomats would be able to persuade the warring parties to negotiate, as is happening in Syria. Otherwise, a war without end, or until death among occupiers, will not exceed the threshold of their tolerance, and the tolerance of American citizens, who by anti-war demonstrations will persuade the administration of Matrasia to withdraw troops. It’s like it was in Vietnam.
  10. +1
    April 30 2018 10: 27
    NATO mission contingent will be present in Afghanistan at the request of the government until peace is established in that country

    then there will be no peace ...
  11. 0
    April 30 2018 10: 30
    T.E. never.
  12. +1
    April 30 2018 11: 08
    We will be there for as long as the Afghan government asks us, or before the country establishes a world with which everyone will agree.

    ... or before a peace is established in the country, with which all will agree - It can only mean one thing: the SGA takes control of heroin production in a single country ... bully
    HEROES HEROIN ...
  13. +1
    April 30 2018 11: 17
    An old barrel organ ...
    Patriots consistently have two conflicting points:
    1. Americans in Afghanistan do not control anything beyond their bases.
    2. Americans control drug production in Afghanistan.
    And how can one control the production of drugs without controlling anything further than their bases? So poppy is not sown in Kandahar or Herat. It is sown in a rural area controlled by ... the Taliban.
    All the more ridiculous are these theses from the citizens of a country in which there is its own drug republic of Tuva, where you can buy anything for “boxes”. But Tuva has no war, not to mention NATO.
  14. 0
    April 30 2018 12: 04
    I suggest ... and then I remembered that now you can really sit down for such offers ... therefore ... addiction does not threaten me and my relatives ... and the pig will always find dirt ...
  15. 0
    April 30 2018 13: 13
    I don’t understand why the Americans need Afghanistan. Nonsense about drugs for Europe and read laziness. If you assess the situation calmly, Afghanistan is the problem of China and the republics of Wed. Of Asia. Destabilization in which will hit Russia.
    It turns out that the Americans stupidly solve problems for their opponents.
    There are versions of pipelines, transit somewhere from somewhere .... In the next decade is not relevant.
    Everything seems to be screwed up by the USA there as well as with Iraq.
  16. 0
    April 30 2018 14: 22
    Of course, they will now stand there until the last Afghan!
  17. 0
    April 30 2018 16: 52
    [quote] We will be there as long as the Afghan government asks us to do this, or before a peace is established in the country, with which everyone will agree [/ quote]
    That is, NATA is there, if not forever, then sooooo long.
  18. 0
    April 30 2018 21: 09
    that drug trafficking failed, that truly greed has no limit, to pack this whole fraternity into a bag and throw it to hell. dreams.
  19. 0
    1 May 2018 10: 36
    Get out of Afghanistan and lose the fat from drugs. Unreal.)))
  20. 0
    1 May 2018 14: 01
    We will be there for as long as the Afghan government asks us, or before the country establishes a world with which everyone will agree.

    After translating from the literary language into literary, this means that peace in Afghanistan will never come by definition, that means they will be there forever or until the overseas hornet's nest is destroyed, then they themselves will not be up to it. Those. mattresses have decided on the date of their withdrawal - never. It’s time to blow the North wind towards the Mujahideen, for some reason, at the time, these s * tanks delivered perfumes to the spirits almost without hiding, because of this our guys died. Or are we so “correct” that we cannot afford to support the enemies of our enemy? One horse-radish * [* family of herbaceous plants] blames us for this ... Take their tactics into service, let them drop striped turntables, destroy convoys, maybe then bake it at 3/14 endos at the fifth point, like in Vietnam?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"