Military Review

The leader of the DPRK called the conditions of complete non-nuclear weapons

59
DPRK leader Kim Jong-un during talks with South Korean President Moon Jae In said that nuclear weapons there will be no sense in the event of the official end of the war with the United States, reports RIA News.




If our meetings with the United States are frequent, and in the future trust and immunity agreement is reached and that the war will end, why should we have nuclear weapons and live in difficult conditions?
quoted Kim Jong-un's statement as a representative of the South Korean administration, Yong Yong Chang.

He emphasized that "despite the fact that Kim Jong-un has always opposed the United States, people will understand that he is not the one who would drop nuclear weapons on the United States, South Korea or the countries of the Pacific region."

He also reported on the North Korean leader’s promise to close the Phunheri nuclear test site in May.

In order to ensure transparency for the international community, we intend to invite experts and journalists to the DPRK,
Kim Jong-un said at the meeting with the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, which took place on April 27.

Recall that after the Korean War (1950-1953), which ended with the signing of an armistice agreement, the state of war is formally preserved on the peninsula. Earlier, US President Donald Trump, who is expected to meet with Kim Jong-un in late May, expressed confidence that the "Korean war will end."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov April 29 2018 07: 51
    +5
    And Eun is a good politician and strategist .. How he sharply turned everything! A year ago, Trump screamed that he would destroy the DPRK hehe and the AUG drove to the shores .. and so on.
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter April 29 2018 07: 57
      +25
      Vital hi In Eun’s place, I wouldn’t rush to believe the United States: the deal with Iran is a good illustration on the topic "US Decency in fulfilling the terms of the treaty." .
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 April 29 2018 08: 04
        +13
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        In Eun’s place, I wouldn’t rush to believe the United States: the deal with Iran is a good illustration on the topic "US Decency in fulfilling the terms of the treaty." .

        Hi Pavel hi
        on the next branch I already quoted these words.
        this applies not only to the Russian Federation.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter April 29 2018 08: 07
          +3
          Hello, Sergey ! hi Americans love to dictate terms and categorically do not accept when conditions dictate to them.
          1. LSA57
            LSA57 April 29 2018 08: 12
            +2
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Americans love to dictate terms and categorically do not accept when conditions dictate to them.

            Yes, that's not the point. they are pathologically unable to keep their word and abide by the agreement.
            the clearest example in the story of O. Henry "Roads that we choose"
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter April 29 2018 08: 20
              +2
              O'Henry often ridiculed the inset mattress in his stories. yes
              1. LSA57
                LSA57 April 29 2018 08: 24
                +7
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                O'Henry often ridiculed the inset mattress in his stories. yes

                that's right. looked into the water laughing
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana April 29 2018 10: 44
                  +1
                  The history of Russia / the USSR and world history teaches that the United States - Washington - can never be trusted!

                  For example, the crime of the US military, hidden from the Soviet people. American bombs exploded 30-40 kilometers from Vladivostok in the fall of 1950. It's hard to believe if it were not for the declassified archival documents of the KGB.

                  How the States bombed the USSR. Posted Mar 22 2009 year


                  This video contains the words of Poltoranin spoken in the program “Moment of Truth” by Karaulov. Poltoranin, as vice-premier of the government of the Russian Federation, then headed the commission for declassifying the KGB documents.

                  Not so long ago, one of the owners of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. in Washington to the question of a Russian journalist: “What do you know about the incident that occurred in 1950 at the Sukhaya Rechka airfield? In your opinion, was it a provocation or a mistake? ” replied: “This incident has become a disgrace for the United States. The very idea that the two pilots did not know where they were, did not know the location of the Soviet border and were not able to understand what they were attacking at the airfield seemed incredible. "
                  1. 97110
                    97110 April 30 2018 14: 34
                    +1
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    Not so long ago, one of the owners of Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

                    It only means that the SS values ​​the Russian market
                2. Iline
                  Iline April 29 2018 10: 54
                  +1
                  Eun is not a simpleton, he set conditions impossible for the Americans
                  and trust will be built in the future and agreement will be reached Immunity and the end of the war
                  .
                  1. Incvizitor
                    Incvizitor April 29 2018 20: 36
                    +1
                    For FSI, an agreement to violate how to blow your nose will come up with another occasion or arrange a provocation.
            2. Vadivak
              Vadivak April 29 2018 11: 04
              +4
              Quote: LSA57
              Yes, that's not the point. they are pathologically unable to keep their word

              They do not know how, do not want, and do not want to be able
        2. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin April 29 2018 11: 29
          +1
          Quote: LSA57
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          In Eun’s place, I wouldn’t rush to believe the United States: the deal with Iran is a good illustration on the topic "US Decency in fulfilling the terms of the treaty." .

          Hi Pavel hi
          on the next branch I already quoted these words.
          this applies not only to the Russian Federation.

          Americans sacredly honor the precepts of US founder George Washington.
          And Washington said that the United States should not fulfill the terms of the signed treaties, especially with European countries.
      2. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov April 29 2018 08: 09
        +2
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Vital hi In Eun’s place, I wouldn’t rush to believe the United States: the deal with Iran is a good illustration on the topic "US Decency in fulfilling the terms of the treaty." .

        But he doesn’t believe Pasha, it’s not in vain that it took so much effort and resources to create this insurance!
        South Korea was a kind of cash cow USA, like Japan! If the north and south agree, they will simply kick the United States off the Korean peninsula and have a different state system, but they can mutually beneficial cooperate China and Russia will help and support them in this case .. If you think, I think it's a great plan!
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter April 29 2018 08: 18
          +3
          The plan is good, but I have no doubt that the US will impede its implementation.
          1. LSA57
            LSA57 April 29 2018 08: 25
            +3
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            The plan is good, but I have no doubt that the US will impede its implementation

            not that word. they’ll stand up against him and connect all their puppets
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter April 29 2018 08: 26
              +2
              Here I am about the same. So the Korean epic is far from over ...
              1. LSA57
                LSA57 April 29 2018 08: 28
                +1
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                Here I am about the same. So the Korean epic is far from over ...

                this is just the beginning
          2. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov April 29 2018 08: 28
            +1
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            The plan is good, but I have no doubt that the US will impede its implementation.

            Well, there would be provocations and maybe it will come to shooting .. The main beginning, we begin to squeeze US bloodsuckers around the world!
            Let's break through Pasha! soldier
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter April 29 2018 08: 32
              +3
              The USA is such a vile country that when it drowns, it will try to drag everyone it can with itself. So it definitely won’t be easy. But who said that we are afraid of difficulties? We overcome them! drinks
              1. The comment was deleted.
      3. self-propelled
        self-propelled April 29 2018 10: 19
        +2
        such relationships are described in one phrase - "... If you read the inscription on the cage of an elephant: buffalo - do not believe your eyes ..." (Kozma Rods)
      4. NIKNN
        NIKNN April 29 2018 10: 23
        +1
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        In the place of Eun, I would not rush to believe the United States

        pasha hi I had the opinion that the vile Americans were pouring something on Eun ... If Macron agreed to work for them to get rid of dandruff, then Eun didn’t have such a problem, and his wife was more beautiful than Makronovskaya ... Spies got into Un’s environment ...
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter April 29 2018 10: 28
          +5
          Given the vile nature of mattresses - anything can be. But I see it more likely that Eun is working on his own plan, the details of which are unknown to us.
          1. NIKNN
            NIKNN April 29 2018 10: 30
            +1
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Given the vile nature of mattresses - anything can be. But I see it more likely that Eun is working on his own plan, the details of which are unknown to us.

            Someone Eun this ... Won
            Is there any place for Assad? Russia, Turkey and Iran discussed
            Assad was not asked, but this one in general ... Well, quiet man, I say the same ... laughing
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter April 29 2018 10: 34
              +2
              To compare Una with Assad is equivalent to comparing sausages with a device. lol
              1. NIKNN
                NIKNN April 29 2018 10: 36
                +1
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                To compare Una with Assad is equivalent to comparing sausages with a device. lol

                Yes, I just joked about it .. Cool mood on the eve of last weekend this week ... yes
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter April 29 2018 10: 38
                  +2
                  I understand and am kidding in response. wink
                  1. NIKNN
                    NIKNN April 29 2018 10: 39
                    +1
                    Quote: bouncyhunter
                    I understand and am kidding in response. wink

                    drinks
      5. Incvizitor
        Incvizitor April 29 2018 20: 34
        +1
        The same topic with the non-proliferation of NATO in the East was led to their lies.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter April 30 2018 08: 23
          +1
          Also a very good example. The only difference is that the promises not to expand NATO to the East were in words, but in this case, Eun is unlikely to follow promises that are not supported by documents. Although does this stop the mattresses? The deal with Iran is again a prime example. hi
    2. Strips
      Strips April 29 2018 08: 00
      +3
      Aha turned so sharply that he began to do what the United States and South Korea wanted.
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain April 29 2018 08: 29
      +3
      DPRK leader Kim Jong-un during talks with South Korean President Moon Jae In said that there would be no point in nuclear weapons if the war with the United States officially ended

      Well, the reason to find a cause for war is like two fingers on asphalt, and the Red Button is still a deterrent for such striped "peacekeepers" yes
    4. krops777
      krops777 April 29 2018 09: 05
      +1
      And Eun is a good politician and strategist .. How he sharply turned everything!


      And then, in the face of severe sanctions, the throne may stagger.
  2. Observer2014
    Observer2014 April 29 2018 07: 51
    0
    The leader of the DPRK called the conditions of complete non-nuclear weapons
    Loot steers. requestAh, help? If anything repeat
  3. askort154
    askort154 April 29 2018 07: 56
    +5
    Nothing new. Another approach to the same rake, and the third. Two were with Kim Jong-un. The USA made a lot of promises and, as always, did not fulfill them.
    1. Strips
      Strips April 29 2018 08: 01
      +4
      Quote: askort154
      The USA made a lot of promises and, as always, did not fulfill


      But did the DPRK do it? wassat
    2. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii April 29 2018 08: 03
      +6
      Really nothing new hi Some are watching and tracking, others are disarming and curtailing their nuclear program. Then some cease to observe and begin to act, in accordance with the situation, and there is nothing to answer the other with. Classics of the genre.
  4. AID.S
    AID.S April 29 2018 08: 02
    0
    If our meetings with the United States are frequent, and trust is built in the future and an agreement is reached on the inviolability and end of the war,


    "Ah, if a dream come true ...
    What life would then begin .. "
  5. udincev
    udincev April 29 2018 08: 02
    +1
    If our meetings with the US are frequent and trust is built in the future and an agreement on immunity is reached
    Trust with the USA, but is it possible? The USSR is not an example of what trust with the USA leads to? They also talked about trust and a shared bright future. Now the future has already come and, as we can see, it is in full “progress”. Kim don't know?
    However, you cannot survive alone. It is necessary to get out and carefully steer. Slalom.
    Good luck to the Koreans! Do not lose, but gain!
  6. gya456
    gya456 April 29 2018 08: 05
    +2
    I do not think that UN is a fool, but in our time, to believe in promises and treaties is suicide! How many of them have been violated and denounced lately! The best argument is a nuclear baton and nothing more! I hope the Korean understands this and just leads some sort of his own game.
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov April 29 2018 08: 34
      +1
      Quote: gya456
      The best argument is a nuclear baton and nothing more! I hope the Korean understands this and just leads some sort of his own game.

      Think in the right direction ...! The DPRK was not just sitting on a starvation diet in complete blockade creating its own nuclear shield. Eun went on a very bold move, extending a hand of friendship to South Korea (without the United States, which is very important) .. Well, God forbid!
  7. populist
    populist April 29 2018 08: 26
    0
    Trump may well sign a package of agreements and brag about his achievements. Achievements in foreign policy Trump is very necessary.
    Eun may well sign. It all depends on Eun's degree of interest. If extremely interested, then no guarantees. If you are very interested, then with guarantees. Warranty can only give China.
    If only “our” wise KHPshniks did not get into the next latrine. wassat
    1. krops777
      krops777 April 29 2018 09: 11
      0
      Trump may well sign a package of agreements and brag about his achievements. Achievements in foreign policy Trump is very necessary.


      Ash stump, and there and to the Nobel in the world is not far.
      1. Andrew3000
        Andrew3000 April 30 2018 01: 12
        +1
        Billionaire Trump received the Nobel Prize: a trifle, but nice
        1. krops777
          krops777 April 30 2018 13: 32
          0
          Billionaire Trump received the Nobel Prize: a trifle, but nice


          Not money, of course, but the fact that it will go down in history as a peacemaker.
  8. Eduard petrov
    Eduard petrov April 29 2018 08: 28
    +3
    The penultimate authoritarian regime, apart from the Arab countries, is a thing of the past. The guns lost to the oil, as usual. In general, authoritarianism in its classical form is atavism. In today's world, such a system affects the poverty and backwardness of technology. Who is next in line?
    1. krops777
      krops777 April 29 2018 09: 15
      +1
      The penultimate authoritarian regime, apart from the Arab countries, is a thing of the past.


      And you think in the USA is wrong? The United States is the most authoritarian, perverted, police state where you can go to court for any bunch.
    2. udincev
      udincev April 30 2018 08: 04
      +1
      Quote: Eduard Petrov
      In today's world, such a system affects the poverty and backwardness of technology.
      Well, yes ... And when comes the "democracy", which defeated the authoritarian regime, then prosperity and the complete victory of the dough over poverty and other "vices" begin laughing. True, often, at the same time, the lives of many people physically or mentally end ... But these are insignificant costs of the victory of freedom to profit from some (minorities) at the expense of others (the remaining majority) and other principles of the "civilized world" bully
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 29 2018 08: 59
    +1
    trust will be built in the future and an agreement on immunity will be reached
    That, as Kim Jong-un understands, will not be in the next decade. And according to this, "three came to mind."
  10. Old26
    Old26 April 29 2018 09: 25
    +2
    Quote: MIKHAN
    And Eun is a good politician and strategist .. How he sharply turned everything! A year ago, Trump screamed that he would destroy the DPRK hehe and the AUG drove to the shores .. and so on.

    A year ago, Eun screamed that he would burn the United States in a nuclear war. Both played and are playing in public, trying to show that each of them is “whiter and fluffier” of his rival

    Quote: MIKHAN
    If north and south are agreed, they will simply kick the US out of the Korean peninsula.

    It will happen oh how soon. The first “pen test” is just an attempt to probe the soil. It will take years, at least, if not decades, to unite on the platform of the "confederation". Otherwise there will be the usual "Absorption". And do not think that the southerners will immediately throw the Americans out. They also need insurance from the northerners, like northerners from the southerners.

    Quote: MIKHAN
    The main beginning, we begin to squeeze out the USA bloodsuckers around the world!

    Vitalik! This should not be considered a trend if the Americans have gained the upper hand somewhere, sometimes even virtual. They haven’t been moved anywhere from their position.

    Quote: MIKHAN
    Quote: gya456
    The best argument is a nuclear baton and nothing more! I hope the Korean understands this and just leads some sort of his own game.

    Think in the right direction ...! The DPRK was not just sitting on a starvation diet in complete blockade creating its own nuclear shield. Eun went on a very bold move, extending a hand of friendship to South Korea (without the United States, which is very important) .. Well, God forbid!

    North Korea’s "nuclear shield" is more of a game to the public, like look, but I also have a bomb. The maximum that he can do with his nuclear "shield" is to shy away from neighbors, Japan and South Korea. He will not be able to hit the United States. Yes, he perfectly understands that a single bursting nuclear warhead of 20-50 kt will not cause much harm to the Americans, and the result will be the destruction of North Korea
    He extended a hand of friendship to South Korea without the United States? Is there any confidence after the usual conversation between the two leaders? If everything is decided without the Americans, then why should he meet with Trump? Do not jump to conclusions

    Quote: populist
    Trump may well sign a package of agreements and brag about his achievements. Achievements in foreign policy Trump is very necessary.

    He has not yet been given the Nobel Peace Prize received by Obama. I would also like to be known as a “peacemaker,” And given the fact that North Korea has been a scarecrow for neighboring countries for decades, it’s okay to agree with Eun - it will be his trump card

    Quote: Eduard Petrov
    The penultimate authoritarian regime, apart from the Arab countries, is a thing of the past. The guns lost to the oil, as usual. In general, authoritarianism in its classical form is atavism. In today's world, such a system affects the poverty and backwardness of technology. Who is next in line?

    Well, there are candidates.
    No. 1 - Iran. Although they are not as poor as the DPRK, the power of the religious elite is similar to the hereditary power of Kim. There, too, the next Ayatollah becomes the leader and permanent head of the country. And before his measure, he is not replaceable. Presidents and premieres are changing, he is not. With the main thing that he will say, not the president

    No. 2. Perhaps you can call Assad. The civil war showed that the country has irreparable contradictions. Here, of course, external events also overlapped - the collapse of Iraq, the emergence of ISIS, and the "velvet revolutions" in neighboring countries.
    I can’t remember other candidates yet
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov April 29 2018 11: 57
      0
      A lot of letters .. hehe
      Quote: Old26
      North Korea’s nuclear shield is more of a game to the public, like look, but I also have a bomb. The maximum that he can do with his nuclear shield is to shy away from neighbors, Japan and South Korea. He’s not will be able.

      Well this is how we and China will resolve ... hehe
      But your beloved Israel, nuclear weapons just bought from England AND ALL! And I’m ready to apply it, and then run away again and dissolve around the world hehe hey And then he will also demand indemnities under "international law", etc. .. laughing
      I have studied them already (6 million))) ... negative
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack April 29 2018 11: 59
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well this is how we and China will resolve ... hehe

        BUKAN, fasten ... not funny already, never stop
        1. Vitaly Anisimov
          Vitaly Anisimov April 29 2018 12: 46
          0
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Well this is how we and China will resolve ... hehe

          BUKAN, fasten ... not funny already, never stop

          I’m not a “loaf”, but I have to agree to be silent .. And then something went hehe hi
  11. Loginoff
    Loginoff April 29 2018 09: 48
    0
    Quote: Eduard Petrov
    The penultimate authoritarian regime, apart from the Arab countries, is a thing of the past. The guns lost to the oil, as usual. In general, authoritarianism in its classical form is atavism. In today's world, such a system affects the poverty and backwardness of technology. Who is next in line?

    The poverty and backwardness of technology is generated by capitalist society.
  12. Kokarev Mikhail
    Kokarev Mikhail April 29 2018 11: 15
    0
    The whole problem is that North Korea was covered by the USSR, and South USA. Now the DPRK has no cover, and the PRC is still occupied by the United States. He wants the United States to leave and Korea to unite - a dream and more. I would like to believe that the United States will even leave somewhere without a scorched ass. He USSR with the withdrawal of troops from Europe is not an example. The list of countries from which they should shed and spend this money to develop at least Detroit is quite large. Eun’s cool idea, God help him.
  13. flicker
    flicker April 29 2018 12: 08
    0
    DPRK leader Kim Jong-un during talks with South Korean President Moon Jae In said that there would be no point in nuclear weapons if the war with the United States officially ended
    And South Korean leader Moon Jae-in seemed to think that he shouldn’t get so excited - many countries are sleeping and seeing nuclear weapons in their arms, weapons that make them feel more secure and sovereign. In the case of the unification of Korea, a nuclear state will appear - hello to Japan, an original state with its policy of complete submission to the United States.
  14. Old26
    Old26 April 29 2018 15: 39
    +1
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Well this is how we and China will resolve ... hehe

    Yeah, if Kim and you give China what to decide. especially to you ... 2 dozen charges with the complete absence of 100% tested missiles and the equally complete absence of aviation - this is of course an awesome shield. Usually in such cases they say - scared a hedgehog naked ... th.

    Quote: MIKHAN
    But your beloved Israel, nuclear weapons just bought from England AND ALL! And I’m ready to apply it, and then run away again and dissolve around the world hehe hey And then he will also demand indemnities under "international law", etc. .

    Well, actually, Israel is your favorite state. There is not a single topic that you don’t mention Israel and the Jews. . So do not translate the arrows into others and hide under this their love for the promised land ...
    If you are already starting to talk about something, then at least learn to start the materiel so as not to be considered a clown. Israel did not buy nuclear weapons from England. Legs in Israeli nuclear weapons are growing from the French nuclear program, when not only nuclear physicists, Jews by nationality helped their historic homeland, but French specialists also provided an opportunity for their Jewish colleagues to get acquainted with the test results. Partially, the legs grow from the American "MP". Plus, uranium, stolen again from the territory of the industrial complex in the United States.
    And it looks like your second love is England. Also, in every post, in every topic you have an Englishwoman. Are you breathing unevenly towards foggy Albion too?
    Is Israel ready to use nuclear weapons? I guess you live in some kind of parallel reality. In our current reality, Israel has NEVER even threatened to use nuclear weapons against its opponents. Although there were enough goals - Syria, Iraq, Egypt, and Iran. So, despite the fact that he has roughly estimated that he has had weapons since 1967, that is, for 50 years, he did not threaten to wipe Iran off the face of the earth and the political map of the world. But Iran-threatened.

    Quote: MIKHAN
    I have studied them already (6 million))) ...

    Only 6 million? Why so modest? Why not 50 billion ???
    An incoherent remark, which you yourself think is probably very thoughtful ... Well, well

    Quote: Kokarev Mikhail
    The whole problem is that North Korea was covered by the USSR, and South USA. Now the DPRK has no cover, and the PRC is still occupied by the United States. He wants the United States to leave and Korea to unite - a dream and more. I would like to believe that the United States will even leave somewhere without a scorched ass. He USSR with the withdrawal of troops from Europe is not an example. The list of countries from which they should shed and spend this money to develop at least Detroit is quite large. Eun’s cool idea, God help him.

    Michael, you probably wanted to say that South Korea is occupied by the Americans, and not China (China)?
    And to be completely accurate, it’s rather difficult to say that the same South Korea and Japan are occupied by the United States. The term occupation nevertheless implies the absence of such state institutions as parliament, government, and president. Based on this logic, most of the Warsaw Pact countries plus Mongolia were occupied by the Soviet Union until the collapse of the Union. After all, there were quite large contingents of Soviet troops
    Eun’s idea can be cool, but complex and very long in time ...

    Quote: flicker
    DPRK leader Kim Jong-un during talks with South Korean President Moon Jae In said that there would be no point in nuclear weapons if the war with the United States officially ended
    And South Korean leader Moon Jae-in seemed to think that he shouldn’t get so excited - many countries are sleeping and seeing nuclear weapons in their arms, weapons that make them feel more secure and sovereign. In the case of the unification of Korea, a nuclear state will appear - hello to Japan, an original state with its policy of complete submission to the United States.

    Nikolay! I think that Moon Jae In is a realist and understands that no progress towards unification without lifting the sanctions will happen. And the lifting of sanctions implies the denuclearization of the peninsula, that is, the dismantling of the military nuclear infrastructure of North Korea and the dismantling of Korean nuclear weapons ...
  15. ventel
    ventel April 29 2018 20: 35
    0
    For some, this is seen as a victory, but if you think about it, it means that the DPRK is refusing to unite, and this means one thing that in North Korea if the ruling elite does not improve the lives of ordinary Koreans, something can happen that happened in socialist-Romanian, Albania, Libya.
  16. Hiller
    Hiller April 29 2018 20: 55
    0
    Well, to promise does not mean to marry ... I think he learned the lessons of Hussein and Gaddafi!