New war? US actually withdrawn from deal with Iran

70
The US Department of State clearly had to step up after German Chancellor Angela Merkel, while on a visit to the United States, made it clear that she opposed the cancellation of the current “nuclear agreement” with Iran. Recall that, according to Merkel, the rupture of this agreement by the United States and several other participants in the transaction may lead to unpredictable consequences. A similar position is expressed by the President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker.

In the USA, they do not hide the fact that they are irritated by such a stance of Europeans, and make it clear that they are ready to crush.



The new head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, who until recently was the head of the CIA, joined the pressure on Europe. State Secretary Adviser Brian Hook stated that the State Department "calls on European partners to take immediate measures and impose sanctions against Iran." According to Hook, the only way to stop the development of Tehran’s missile program. Impose sanctions - and there is a break the previously reached agreement with Iran.

New war? US actually withdrawn from deal with Iran

Mr Pompeo


Hook claims that the development of a nuclear program in Iran "carries a threat to international security."

Today, the topic of countering Tehran Pompeo is going to discuss with representatives of the authorities of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Imneno Israel, by the way, and shows the greatest zeal in this matter. The main anti-Iranian trio will work out measures that essentially confirm the fact that the States unilaterally withdrew from the agreement with the Iranian side and are ready for the usual policy of provocations against the background of sanctions.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com, IRNA
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    April 29 2018 07: 01
    Does the thing smell fried !? Is it really going to fight with Iran? Or do they want to change the situation in the ATS through pressure on the Persians?
    The Saudis and Israel are sworn allies, of course, but the enemy of my enemy is mine ...
    1. +15
      April 29 2018 07: 04
      DPRK was simpler, serious friends were near, and Israel was far away ..! Hold on Iran begins a new round of bullying and blockade ..
      1. +21
        April 29 2018 07: 33
        All this fuss around Iran is very, very bad for Armenia. Iran is our closest neighbor, and benevolent.
        And US actions undermine peace in the region - according to all IAEA reports, Iran does not violate a single point on a nuclear deal. And US diplomats put forward additional requirements. And if Iran does not fulfill these new requirements, then the Americans threaten to break previous agreements - a complete madhouse. And knowing this, Comrade Kim the Third, wants to come to an agreement with the United States and destroy its nuclear bombs. After that, the United States put forward new demands to North Korea, threatening to break the previous agreement.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          April 29 2018 10: 32
          Quote: mamertinets
          All this fuss around Iran is very, very bad for Armenia.

          but this is not bad for us ... firstly, because it distracts the attention of the "civilized" from Russia, secondly, we may, I repeat, maybe there will be a good buyer of our weapons, who no longer need to be afraid of some kind of sanctions for it ...
          1. +1
            April 29 2018 13: 56
            Oil will again be 100 or more. Oil in rubles above 5000.
        3. +3
          April 29 2018 20: 52
          Iran is our closest neighbor, and friendly.

          Maybe that's why they are shaking Armenia. to get to Iran request
          1. +1
            April 30 2018 16: 02
            There were such versions, or rather there are.
          2. +1
            April 30 2018 16: 10
            Get through where? Through Georgia and then Armeria? The roads there are not very much, and the railway must have already left for the second hour.
            1. 0
              April 30 2018 19: 09
              I don’t directly mean to get there and quietly destabilize everything around, there, in Afghanistan, the Amerz terrorists are in full swing, the Saudis with Qatar are still ... like the Turks, in Iraq, too, do not understand who is the boss, they are embracing with might and main like Russia.
              1. 0
                2 May 2018 18: 40
                So, of course, this is the question of whom Azerbaijan is supporting? And the question is not simple oh not simple. There are a lot of Azerbaijanis in northern Iran.
                Yes, and before Astrakhan and Dagestan, it will not be difficult to impose Iran from the north.
      2. +16
        April 29 2018 07: 34
        The US withdrawal from the deal with Iran is further proof of which mattresses are "doves of the world."
        1. +10
          April 29 2018 07: 38
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          what mattresses are "doves of the world."

          Paul, hi what other pigeons! They crap everywhere, for everything, and for any reason ... Where they eat, where they sit, and what they fly over. Especially there, with what they "fly"!
          "...– The dove is the bird of the world! –So my" goose ", by God, does not want war!"
          1. +5
            April 29 2018 07: 47
            Hello Sasha ! hi I'm still waiting for the mattresses to be poisoned by their own poison. But it looks like they, like that cobra from Mowgli, survived their poison ...
        2. +6
          April 29 2018 07: 40
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          The US withdrawal from the deal with Iran is further proof of which mattresses are "doves of the world."

          Yeah, there’s a complete seam there, among the staff. First they agree on one point with Iran, it clearly fulfills all the clauses of the agreement, and then the States put forward new claims, threatening to denounce the previous agreement. The United States will issue a stupid and adventurous policy.
          1. +8
            April 29 2018 07: 53
            As I said earlier: US great masters change the rules of the game on the go. For yourself, of course.
        3. +2
          April 29 2018 10: 50
          But you see there will be aggravation there may be a little respite for Russia.
          1. +2
            April 29 2018 10: 51
            It is unlikely . Mattresses will also find the Kremlin’s hand there.
            1. +2
              April 29 2018 10: 53
              Well .. I’ll say this, it’s better to fight with them mainly with the wrong hands in Syria, Iran and anywhere else than say in Ukraine or Russia itself.
              1. +4
                April 29 2018 10: 56
                In fact, just mattresses are specialists in raking the heat with the wrong hands. "Hit the enemy with his own weapon"?
                1. +3
                  April 29 2018 12: 32
                  What alternatives do you see? Sit quietly or rub them on the forehead? What for?
                  But if they got into a long and viscous hot war with someone. Yes, they would have focused on her ...

                  Remember Vietnam and Korea. Now, of course, the scale of the military operations and the costs that they are ready to go are most likely not the same. But in Syria they seem to have lost, failed to implement any of their plans and are thinking of how to get out of there (from this and the whole howl of recent months). When they leave Syria they will start a new project somewhere else. It would be nice if neither Ukraine, nor Armenia and Azerbaijan, for example, became this place.

                  Another thing is that the Iranians are not fools. They would also be happy to stand aside while others would fight among themselves.
                  1. +4
                    April 29 2018 12: 38
                    I agree with your reasoning. But we can only speculate. How events will actually develop - time will tell.
        4. +1
          April 30 2018 16: 04
          Israel could pull on the ears of the Trump administration, and the redhead was glad to try. Macron looking in the EU, Israel in the BV. Idylls. hi
          1. +1
            April 30 2018 16: 10
            hi
            Yes, they have figs to understand who blows something to someone, who commands, and who obeys. Sometimes it seems that they have a moving schedule, like lumberjacks. lol
    2. +3
      April 29 2018 07: 07
      Quote: Logall
      Does the thing smell fried !?


      Only the gravy began to cook!
      1. Don
        +6
        April 29 2018 07: 19
        From the point of view of the United States and Iran, they have no other way but to get out of the nuclear deal in order to prevent the development of Iran. Since the signing of this treaty, Iran has virtually eliminated economic, financial, and political isolation. Not completely of course, but for the most part. Jews with Anglo-Saxons and Saudis by any means will not allow the excessive strengthening of Iran, right up to the war.
    3. Maz
      +9
      April 29 2018 07: 10
      Who would doubt about Israel. Syria broke off, so took up Tehran. As I understand it, hezbollah has not yet said its word in Lebanon.
      1. +12
        April 29 2018 07: 19
        The Americans got an additional incentive to act after the skinny unification of Iran, Turkey and Russia happened before their eyes.
        1. +6
          April 29 2018 07: 33
          Good morning soldier
          The stripes got it !!!!
          Not the most traveling travelers in one (approximately) direction began to move!
          Some more efforts of striped, travel companions can become more, and some will wag some less!
      2. 0
        April 29 2018 08: 31
        Quote: Maz
        Who would doubt about Israel. Syria broke off


        Where did they break off? lol

        Quote: Maz
        As I understand it, hezbollah has not yet said its word in Lebanon.


        If the Hezbollah terrorists will speak, then as a trite time - hiding behind civilians and shelling civilians in Israel.
    4. +2
      April 29 2018 09: 51
      Tortured to fight with him-this is not Iraq.
      1. +1
        April 29 2018 18: 40
        Hussein’s Iraqi army was significantly stronger than Iran’s.
        Iran has weak ground forces, aviation at zero.
        But a lot of missiles.
        1. +2
          April 29 2018 22: 01
          And we will not measure \ consider the potentials of the current and as if stepped aside, enemies of the Jewish state. Let's look at the reaction of the authorities of the “chosen” to the current threats?
          Who do you think? In my opinion, everything can be bad and they understand it ....
    5. SAG
      0
      April 30 2018 07: 10
      You [quote = Logall] It smells fried !? Is it really going to fight with Iran? / quote]
      You are so surprised ... these plans were developed back in the late nineties, and recently an American general announced this. And all the wars in the Middle East were only preparations for the invasion of Iran, with which mattresses simply wage war without the environment and hordes of terrorists. Remember only informational training (for example, a film of 300 Spartans) ...
  2. +4
    April 29 2018 07: 08
    which essentially confirm the fact that the States unilaterally withdrew from the agreement with the Iranian side

    and they at least when they respected ... and applies not only to the Russian Federation
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +2
        April 29 2018 07: 28
        Quote: dorz

        Obviously, the West is not going to just defeat us, it will destroy us

        so that was always their goal
      2. +2
        April 29 2018 07: 34
        Her God punished. In old age, she began to suffer from dementia (senile dementia).
      3. +2
        April 29 2018 10: 26
        Why post a fictional quote about 15 million Russians? Do you even check before you post, or you just wanted to throw a fan?
        1. +3
          April 29 2018 10: 30
          Quote: Tiras
          Why post a fictional quote about 15 million Russians?

          But what about it? Holy Demotivator laughing

          Why check something when you really want to believe wink
        2. +1
          April 29 2018 11: 19
          Quote: Tiras
          Why post a fictional quote about 15 million Russians? Do you even check before you post, or you just wanted to throw a fan?

          Written on Wikipedia, the first Google link on request:

          About 15 million Russians should remain, the minimum quantity sufficient to extract raw materials and serve gas and oil pipelines. - For the first time, such a phrase is mentioned in the book of Andrei Parshev “Why Russia is not America”: “... once I came across some public statement by M. Thatcher in sound recordings on foreign policy.
          I still have free Google laughing
          1. 0
            April 29 2018 11: 31
            Quote: dorz
            Written on Wikipedia, Google's first link on request

            One more time:

            I will disappoint you: this is, as it is now customary to put it, a fake (from fake - fake). Thatcher did not say this, and did not even say anything close.
            This issue was discussed, including at VO (a couple of years ago, in my opinion).
            You can search, everything was very clearly painted there. Especially since you have
            Quote: dorz
            ... while Google is free
            1. 0
              April 29 2018 12: 06
              My first post is quoting and supporting a recording of Satanovsky. A picture is just an attraction, not a message. I expressed my opinion in the text. Good luck hi
              1. 0
                April 29 2018 12: 10
                Quote: dorz
                A picture is just a catch, not a promise

                Next time publish the porn right away. And people will reach for you Yes
                Quote: dorz
                I expressed my opinion in the text

                Is it about free google, or what?
                Your picture was nailed, so now it’s hard to understand what was and wasn’t request
                1. +1
                  April 29 2018 12: 55
                  [/ quote] Your picture was nailed, so now it’s hard to understand what was and what was not request[/ Quote]
                  There, it was about the desire of the West for our complete physical destruction, and not formal victory.
    2. +6
      April 29 2018 07: 30
      Hello Sergey drinks How many presidents there are so many approaches to the Iranian problem, how many state secretaries, so many shades to this topic, they can change their shoes on the go, equilibrists - dirty tricks. hi
      1. +2
        April 29 2018 07: 37
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        How many presidents there are so many approaches to the Iranian problem, how many state secretaries, so many shades to this topic, they can change their shoes on the go, equilibrists are dirty tricks

        Hi drinks
        so it also depends on Iran. a little concession, they seem to put less pressure. then the pressure is increased, Iran is also standing on end. and went on a new one. Well, they can’t sit. they need to crush and destroy any thought that they are not the masters of the world
  3. +3
    April 29 2018 07: 09
    Iran needs to shoot up with ballistic missiles ... you see jumped smile
    1. +4
      April 29 2018 07: 23
      Quote: Click
      Iran needs to shoot up with ballistic missiles ... you see jumped

      to fall on your head? belay
      no, in the direction of the hegemon is necessary. Eun there just hinted, so the aircraft carriers immediately deployed laughing
      1. 0
        April 29 2018 07: 32
        So Eun pulled them up during the earthquakes lol
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +2
    April 29 2018 07: 12
    The United States supports all of Iran’s fiercest enemies. The outcome is logical. Eurogroups will suffer losses, but they will not get used to it. Atlantic solidarity is above all.
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
  7. +5
    April 29 2018 07: 32
    After such information, the conclusion suggests itself: Iran needs to be helped in every possible way, since the United States ruling in the United States people have already lost their human appearance and are ready to commit any crimes.
    By the way, would the Americans want to repeat the scenario of the invasion of Iran carried out by the British in August 1941 (!)? The invasion was quite successful. But Soviet Russia also had to enter its troops for reliability, to be sure that the British would not help the oil of Nazi Germany. But that was back in 1941. Have Americans messed up centuries? Or did madness and senile dementia dominate in the West?
    1. SAG
      0
      April 30 2018 07: 24
      But Soviet Russia also had to enter its troops for reliability, to be sure that the British would not help the oil of Nazi Germany.

      Your knowledge of history is weak. Stalin introduced 5 of his armies and Iran in August 1941, just at the request of the British ambassador. The British in the Middle East, the situation was not at all important, and Rommel was eager for oil-bearing areas controlled by the British + uprisings of local Aborigines. And the Iranians were generally declared Hitler as direct descendants of the Aryans, that is, they were potential allies of the Germans.
      1. 0
        1 May 2018 09: 50
        And what is the weakness of knowledge of history? The fact that he did not call the Iranians allies of Hitler. So this is not true. They were not allies. And if some crazy person calls someone allies, this does not change the state of affairs. And Rommel was as much a threat to the British as rain, periodically happening on their island. But oil is the concept of the whole head. And since Stalin understood that Churchill, who had actually misinformed him about the intentions of fascist Germany during the 1940-beginning of the 1941 period, there was a deployment of troops to Iran from our side, in order to somehow prevent the British from selling Iranian oil to anyone they wanted, including German troops in North Africa. After Hitler’s attack, geopolitics began to occupy I.V. Stalin is much more than the requests of some ambassadors and the position of the so-called "allies." So, dear, "knowing the story", you still have to think a little.
  8. +7
    April 29 2018 07: 35
    Iran will save it only if Russia places its missile base there (it can even be done jointly with Turkey)))) .. And they still offered us their military airfields during the start of the operation in Syria, but we modestly refused to understand what a howl would start in Israel!
    Now I think the time has come, we can do everything after rocket attacks on Syria!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      April 29 2018 08: 41
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Iran will save only if Russia places its missile base there




      Assad is very helpful in Syria lol



      Quote: MIKHAN
      And they, even during the start of the operation in Syria, offered their military airfields, but we modestly refused, realizing what a howl would begin in Israel!



      Are you afraid of Israel? Oh wow lol

      The matter was simpler - Iran refused to Russia.
      Russia wanted a real military airfield, and Iran was ready to give Russia the opportunity to use the airfield as a jump airfield, leaving full control.

      1. +2
        April 29 2018 09: 09
        Quote: Tiras
        Are you afraid of Israel? Oh wow

        In vain, giggle .. Let's see!
        And Israel, it’s like a baby begins to yell, if without "boobs" ..then plug your ears at least! wassat
        1. +2
          April 29 2018 09: 42
          Yes, Israel yelled at Syria and destroyed a dozen Iranian terrorists there, yelled at Shiite terrorists in Syria and those who help them and bombed them.
          This Russia often likes to express concern instead of real action.
          1. +2
            April 29 2018 11: 29
            Quote: Tiras
            Yes, Israel yelled at Syria and destroyed a dozen Iranian terrorists there, yelled at Shiite terrorists in Syria and those who help them and bombed them.
            This Russia often likes to express concern instead of real action.

            We are also acting in a quiet and not in vain this howl is going on in Israel as well! !
            They wet the Iranians for a long time already .. I remember the nuclear scientists were soaked, there are several generals in Syria .. No matter how the Zionist Jews began to be wet, around the world (I said nothing in vain ..)))) But they, they run into it men hi Everything is possible for them, and why other nations cannot be ..? They also have the right to defend themselves ...
            1. 0
              April 29 2018 11: 52
              Brack! Finished on this or the weekend you spoil.
              1. 0
                April 29 2018 12: 27
                Quote: Banshee
                Brack! Finished on this or the weekend you spoil.

                All the men in the trenches .. Roman is right and the shooting will begin! And then let's talk again .. hi
  9. +5
    April 29 2018 07: 48
    Against Iran, Israel is all out of balance, because of the back of the United States. Israel is tied to the USA through the most powerful Jewish lobby in all US power and banking structures. And with the advent of Trump, family ties also appeared. On criminal slang, Israel is the sixth USA in the BV. Yes
    1. 0
      April 29 2018 09: 36
      Everything is so, but vice versa. This is the United States six of Israel, and if you do not understand this, then look at the facts.
  10. +4
    April 29 2018 08: 01
    Quote: mamertinets
    All this fuss around Iran is very, very bad for Armenia. Iran is our closest neighbor, and benevolent.
    And US actions undermine peace in the region - according to all IAEA reports, Iran does not violate a single point on a nuclear deal. And US diplomats put forward additional requirements. And if Iran does not fulfill these new requirements, then the Americans threaten to break previous agreements - a complete madhouse. And knowing this, Comrade Kim the Third, wants to come to an agreement with the United States and destroy its nuclear bombs. After that, the United States put forward new demands to North Korea, threatening to break the previous agreement.

    Dear American.
    From our bell tower it is seen that color revolutionary fuss in Armenia just has Iran as its real goal.
    Squeeze Russia out of Armenia.
    In Kazakhstan, in the Caspian, deploy NATO bases and continue according to the program.
    You hold on there.
    Do not be fooled. hi
  11. +3
    April 29 2018 08: 28
    That's right the USA is doing. Iran’s support for Shiite terrorists crosses all borders.
    It is not surprising that Israel for sanctions against Iran, which is located 1500 km from Israel, helps terrorists with money and weapons against Israel.
  12. +7
    April 29 2018 08: 48
    Quote: Tiras
    That's right the USA is doing. Iran’s support for Shiite terrorists crosses all borders.
    It is not surprising that Israel for sanctions against Iran, which is located 1500 km from Israel, helps terrorists with money and weapons against Israel.

    My dear Jew, you have not forgotten that Israel provides military-technical assistance to Georgia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, which have a common border or are located in close proximity to the borders of Russia. In my opinion, the behavior of Israel accurately describes the behavior of the younger brother, who acts having behind the elder. Ultimately, this harms Israel more, if it had an independent policy, it would have to build relations with all, especially the strong countries of the region. But pride and the very support interfere. We will wait and see who as a result will bring more troubles to Israel, Persians, Arabs, Turks or Americans.
    1. +4
      April 29 2018 09: 01
      Quote: ALSur
      My dear jew


      Watch your tongue.


      Quote: ALSur
      You have not forgotten that Israel provides military-technical assistance to Georgia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, which have a common border or are located in close proximity to the borders of Russia.


      So what? Russia asked Israel not to supply some weapons, and Israel did.



      Quote: ALSur
      In my opinion, the behavior of Israel accurately describes the behavior of the younger brother, who acts having behind the older


      You with a look are clearly not very.
      Do you think Israel should avoid selling weapons to countries it borders on with Russia?
      Why?

      Russia helps Syria with which Israel is at war, at the same time Russia is not at war with Georgia, Ukraine, or other countries.


      Quote: ALSur
      Ultimately, this harms Israel more, if it had an independent policy, it would have to build relations with all, especially the strong countries of the region. But pride and that support interfere


      It is ridiculous, given that Israel has concluded a peace treaty with Jordan and Egypt, and according to the first resolution of the Crimea, Israel abstained, did not begin to adhere to sanctions as European countries, etc.

      But is Russia doing well with neighboring countries?

      Quote: ALSur
      We will wait and see who as a result will bring more troubles to Israel, Persians, Arabs, Turks or Americans.


      You are unlikely to see it since you have a veil before your eyes.
  13. +3
    April 29 2018 09: 03
    “Calls on European partners to take immediate measures and impose sanctions against Iran”
    Everything is as usual - a simple American dictatorship and nothing more. Once again, Europe can be "congratulated" on the obvious swing of the United States, which they tolerantly want to retouch.
  14. +1
    April 29 2018 10: 23
    Recall that, according to Merkel, the breakdown of this agreement by the United States and a number of other parties to the transaction may lead to unpredictable consequences.

    Well. Chancellor has shown political wisdom and vision. Understands that in the event of a break it will only get worse.

    Quote: Logall
    Does the thing smell fried !? Is it really going to fight with Iran? Or do they want to change the situation in the ATS through pressure on the Persians?
    The Saudis and Israel are sworn allies, of course, but the enemy of my enemy is mine ...

    While there is "artillery preparation." What it will pour into is not known. The Saudis also well understand that the Americans are far away, Iran will not create ICBMs yet, but the breakdown of agreements will lead to the intensification of Iran’s nuclear development. And the range of existing Iranian missiles, especially with nuclear charges, is enough to cause unacceptable damage to Saudi Arabia, unlike the Hussite ones. And that means the need for nuclear weapons and the Saudis, who financed the Pakistani nuclear program. Indeed, the enemy of my enemy is not always, but .... If the Israeli Air Force is not talking about the use of ASA aerodromes, then start Iran to deploy its military nuclear program - such jump aerodromes may appear

    Quote: mamertinets
    Yeah, there’s a complete seam there, among the staff. First they agree on one point with Iran, it clearly fulfills all the clauses of the agreement, and then the States put forward new claims, threatening to denounce the previous agreement. The United States will issue a stupid and adventurous policy.

    In this case, the current president is to blame. The previous one participated in the agreement and itself lifted the sanctions. The current one behaves like an "elephant in a china shop." He wants to seem like a tough guy. And it’s not yet clear what it is. Either the "smokescreen" and the simple escalation of tension, or the United States will really withdraw from the agreement. But even among the allies there is no unanimity. Merkel said undesirable exit. While he was supported by Marcon. .
    Quote: Donskoy
    From the point of view of the United States and Iran, they have no other way but to get out of the nuclear deal in order to prevent the development of Iran. Since the signing of this treaty, Iran has virtually eliminated economic, financial, and political isolation. Not completely of course, but for the most part. Jews with Anglo-Saxons and Saudis by any means will not allow the excessive strengthening of Iran, right up to the war.

    it’s problematic for Jews to get away with Iran because of the large distances. It is one thing to deal with the Iranian contingents in Syria, it is quite another to strike at Iran. The Saudis, although they are enemies of Iran, do not yet go for a direct confrontation. And they’re unlikely to go if they don’t have nuclear weapons. The region is now stable, but for now. Whether there will be an increase in confrontation or not is an open question.

    In any case, the breakdown of agreements will hit Iran the hardest. Nuclear weapons will not appear by magic. It will take several years to build up a stock of fissile materials sufficient to produce 1-2 units of nuclear weapons. if there is any fighting, Iran will try to block the Strait of Hormuz in order to prevent the entry of the US Navy into the Gulf. But blocking the bay, they will put themselves in a difficult position. The United States will block the strait with a second layer. This will not affect Saudis especially if there are no serious blows to their oil and gas complex. In short, nothing good. It is also not particularly beneficial for us to have another nuclear state in our underbelly, especially a Muslim one with such a form of government as they have now.

    Quote: Click
    Iran needs to shoot up with ballistic missiles ... you see jumped smile

    Where up? Myself on your head? Or nuclear India? Nuclear Pakistan? Where do you offer them to shoot? Maybe towards nuclear Russia?

    Quote: Click
    no, in the direction of the hegemon it is necessary

    This is so far from a series of unscientific fiction. It’s much more difficult for them to “shoot” to the hegemon than we can get to Beijing in a kneeling state

    Quote: Click
    So Eun pulled them up during the earthquakes lol

    Oh well, and during what earthquakes did Eun bullet? The fact that Eun was bullying did not give special advantages for defense. True, he had no other options.

    Quote: mig29mks
    Hands itch at the world gigimon, as if the mug was not cleaned by a gigimon, the gigimon re-evaluates its strength!

    In 12 words, 7 spelling mistakes - this is famously ...

    Quote: Observer2014
    Iran is too tough.Yao drives! And in Russia, in general, super charges and delivery vehicles. Therefore, villains (partners) arivederchi with a brush laughing

    What did you mean? Who has nuclear weapons? Iran, which does not have it, or the USA and Israel (although the latter does not confirm that it has it). And what about supercharges in Russia? And their delivery vehicles? Or those media from cartoons before the election?

    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Quote: Observer2014
    Iran is too tough.Yao drives! And in Russia, in general, super charges ...

    What, you can already "Urya"?
    Are you really ... so talented, or just pretending to be talented?

    And "Urya !!!" already possible. And applaud the talent of the author of the post, too. good

    Quote: 1536
    After such information, the conclusion suggests itself: Iran needs to be helped in all possible ways,

    Give them half of our strategic missile forces and the same amount of nuclear weapons? Or will we help any regime, should it only be said that it is against the United States? So we already went through this in the USSR, when it was enough to tell someone that he was against the United States and for the socialist path of development both money and weapons flowed like him. And do not care that the president is a cannibal and in the refrigerator he has dismembered bodies. He is against the United States and for socialism. This is the main thing.

    And the fact that the Iranians are not even allies to us, and so, travel companions in the Syrian issue - is that nothing? That until recently we were enemies to them similar to the USA - nothing? Nothing that these "allies" tried to throw us during the development of this agreement on the nuclear program, when they tried to drive a wedge between us and the other contracting parties? Nothing that our bombers sometimes had to use international air corridors to bombard the barmaley in Syria? nothing that after one time when they allowed us to use our air base as a jump airfield - did they forbid us to do it the next time? Nothing that giving twice the opportunity to shoot from the Caspian Sea, through Iranian airspace, then she closed it? And then they need to help in every possible way ???

    Quote: MIKHAN
    Iran will save only if Russia places its missile base there

    Vitalik!!! Another morning, albeit a weekend? Why so in the morning to gain in order to carry such nonsense. Pity your liver .... Keep your wet dreams to yourself. And then you are ready to help everyone, it is worth someone to say that the United States is their enemy ... And read again what I wrote above for 1536

    Quote: MIKHAN
    And they, even during the start of the operation in Syria, offered their military airfields, but we modestly refused, realizing what a howl would begin in Israel!

    Do not distort. They allowed us to use them. ONE times for TU-22M3, and the second time FORBIDDEN use this base as a jump airfield so as not to fly to refuel and load ammunition in Mozdok

    Quote: Tiras
    Russia wanted a real military airfield, and Iran was ready to give Russia the opportunity to use the airfield as a jump airfield, leaving full control.

    They even as a jump airfield did not give the opportunity to use it. not to be based there, but they didn’t even let them refuel and reload with bombs. "Soyuznichki", damn it ...
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +3
    April 29 2018 10: 37
    Quote: Tiras
    That's right the USA is doing. Iran’s support for Shiite terrorists crosses all borders.
    It is not surprising that Israel for sanctions against Iran, which is located 1500 km from Israel, helps terrorists with money and weapons against Israel.


    Well, Israel is the well-known "dove of peace" in BV, with its own bombing!
  17. 0
    April 29 2018 21: 27
    Who would doubt who stirs up the water. Again these ..? surrenders to me. soon someone will call trouble, on their own pace!
  18. 0
    April 30 2018 06: 58
    Yes, Saudi money and the giant pro-Israel lobby, or rather, the owners of America, are crushing America. In fact, the entire US government and congressmen are appointed by this shadow government of the world (India and China are also subordinate to this elite. Bravura, bold rhetoric of China, Russia, India is a screen!)
    Iran, considering itself the successor of Darius and Cyrus, in every possible way resists "barbarians". His army is pretty solid. But his allies, except Yemen - zero. North Korea and she did not dare to intervene. Pakistan? Taliban? Tied hand and foot ... In addition, Iran is swinging the fifth column, pushing to the "Maidan" and counter-revolution.
  19. 0
    April 30 2018 10: 27
    The development of the nuclear program in Iran brings him security, as does the DPRK from the rabid hyenas represented by the United States.
  20. 0
    April 30 2018 11: 15
    But Trump in fact exacerbated or aggravates relations with all opponents of the United States in geopolitics. He steeply grabbed a handful of European leaders, confidently launched his fingers into Armenia and Kazakhstan (everyone is aware of the latest news), all the same, this is not the first time that he has hit Syria, he is methodically building resistance to China, and of all these movements, it naturally becomes more difficult for Russia. But many "experts" naively believed that he would be a great "friend" for Russia than Obama. Obama next to him is just a dove.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"