Totally Russian. Domestic version of the UAV "Outpost" will enter the troops in the 2019 year

86
The Russian Armed Forces will receive a fully Russian version of the Forpost unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). As they said in the Ministry of Defense, already in 2019, the troops will begin to receive fully assembled from Russian components and based on domestic technical solutions Drones.

Totally Russian. Domestic version of the UAV "Outpost" will enter the troops in the 2019 year




The basis for the "Forpost" was the Israeli UAV Searcher 2. The decision to start its licensed production at the plant in Yekaterinburg was made under Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov. Initially, the drones were assembled from kits supplied from Israel. Since 2012, the specialists of OJSC RTI Systems have been engaged in the localization of production drone and the gradual introduction of Russian components.

"Outpost" is designed to solve reconnaissance tasks, as well as to adjust artillery fire. The size and capacity of this UAV can carry powerful optical-electronic equipment, as well as a solid supply of fuel. The presence of conventional and infrared cameras makes it possible to observe at any time of the day. The UAV is equipped with an economical piston engine that allows you to stay in the air for up to 17 hours. The range of the drone is about 250 km.

At present, the Outposts remain the largest modern UAV used in the Russian Armed Forces, but with the beginning of deliveries to the troops of a smaller Corsair system and a larger Orion dimension, the need for Outposts will become less significant, Izvestia reports.
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 28 2018 07: 45
    TTX in the studio
    1. +7
      April 28 2018 07: 47
      Yes, in nete these data. How old is his ancestor? About thirty years, no less?
      Quote: Heterocapsa
      TTX in the studio
      1. +2
        April 28 2018 07: 54
        Quote: 210ox
        How old is his ancestor? Thirty years, no less?

        but with the beginning of deliveries to the troops of systems of a smaller dimension "Corsair" and a larger dimension "Orion" the need for "Outposts" will not be so essential, Izvestia reports

        I think for a long time they are pushing with their elbows!
        Nobody will miss such a “tasty” piece from the Ministry of Defense, but the opportunities of our firms and firms in bulk, globalization, however winked and no ,, sanctions, ”there is no hindrance wink
        1. 0
          April 28 2018 15: 18
          Quote: himRa
          I think for a long time they are pushing with their elbows!
          Nobody will miss such a “tasty” piece from the Ministry of Defense ... and

          20 years behind ...
      2. +2
        April 28 2018 08: 24
        Quote: 210ox
        The basis for the "Outpost" was the Israeli UAV Searcher 2

        Stolen or bought?
        1. +6
          April 28 2018 08: 53
          Bought a production license. All is fair.
        2. +1
          April 28 2018 10: 55
          Vadim are you adequate ?, I look at the comments at the bottom of the article so many near-by ran, They write all sorts of nonsense, it is not clear what.
        3. +1
          April 28 2018 14: 45
          Quote: Vadivak
          Quote: 210ox
          The basis for the "Outpost" was the Israeli UAV Searcher 2

          Stolen or bought?

          Yes.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        April 28 2018 08: 00
        Rahim hi !Congratulations, lol Now you are in the US on the "black list"! lol As an agent you know who wassat if you google banned! !! hi
        1. +4
          April 28 2018 08: 06
          Quote: Herkulesich
          Raheem! Congratulations, now you are in the United States on the black list! As an agent, you yourself know who if Google banned you! !!

          Thank you friend for appreciating my modest efforts! laughing
          Well ... I remembered the joke I don’t remember who laid out on VO:
          Two ravens are sitting at the start of the American ICBM, they argue ...
          -Takes off!
          - no ... will not fly!
          The rocket starts and ... explodes,
          -that you fucked up !!!
          - I serve the Soviet Union! tongue
    3. +5
      April 28 2018 07: 57
      Well, yes, either in 19 or in 20 g, well, no later than 25 g, there is no money, somewhere like that.
      1. +3
        April 28 2018 10: 20
        If only you had them! And we’ll find it somehow.
        1. +2
          April 28 2018 10: 33
          Quote: konstantin68
          If only you had them! And we’ll find it somehow.

          ask Dimon, he will.
    4. +1
      April 28 2018 07: 58
      Quote: Heterocapsa
      TTX in the studio

      Something in appearance it is roughly tailored, but oh well that is, maybe it has an outstanding filling, although I suppose that the collected trophy foreign unmanned aerial material in Syria will allow our craftsmen to advance in this field of design.
      1. +4
        April 28 2018 09: 08
        Quote: Ancestors from the Don

        Something in appearance it is roughly cut

        If this is about the fuselage, then everything is fine here: the UAV should be cheap and technologically advanced and, just, flat panels (at most - bent "cold") is what you need. And it’s easier to attach the filling to flat structural elements.
        And at its speeds, the resistance of the round fuselage, that of the rectangular is not very different.
    5. +1
      April 28 2018 09: 30
      Quote: Heterocapsa
      TTX ...

      hi , Length: 6 m.;
      Wingspan: 9,1 m .;
      Height: 1,22 m .;
      Maximum takeoff weight: 130 kg .;
      Cruising flight speed: 150 km \ h .;
      Maximum flight speed: 200 km \ h .;
      Maximum flight distance: 250 km .;
      Maximum flight height: 7000 m .;
      aircraft engine type: a piston;
      Power: 45 hp
      2015 g
    6. +7
      April 28 2018 12: 25
      Quote: Heterocapsa
      TTX in the studio

      to call an outpost FULLY Russian is how to call an iPhone - completely Chinese. laughing
      1. +3
        April 28 2018 14: 18
        Well, the more time passes, the more the iPhone becomes completely Chinese. So everything is right here
      2. 0
        April 29 2018 17: 56
        Quote: kipod
        to call an outpost FULLY Russian is how to call an iPhone - completely Chinese.

        call UAV Searcher 2 FULLY Israeli - this is how to call iPhone - completely Chinese.
    7. The comment was deleted.
  2. +2
    April 28 2018 07: 57
    If this is the case, then it may be a priority to give Orion, is it an attack drone, which is more important to us, and which can also carry out reconnaissance along the way? ??
    1. +1
      April 28 2018 08: 08
      Most likely yes, and reconnaissance drones and corrective fires can be reduced to the size of the palm of your hand, so it will be more difficult to detect it with all the advantages of reconnaissance optics.
    2. -1
      April 28 2018 11: 23
      It seems that Orion was completely pushed into a corner ... There is no end to trials, but a wonderful machine turned out.
  3. +8
    April 28 2018 08: 09
    Having experience, developments, design "schools" and the results of their work (Sukhoi, Yakovlev, Lavochkin, Ilyushin, Tupolev, Mikoyan, Myasishchev, Beriev, Polikarpov, Antonov and others), it is difficult to imagine that they were in UAV issues, "behind the planet all. " Even today, unknown KBs are working on these projects ..... There is no school, there is no interest in famous KBs, is protectionism or the influx of literate youth in the KBs dried up?
    But once upon a time, they started to teach primitive UAVs in the circles of technical creativity. In 60-70, most of the boys, at least once, but bought models from shingles, parchment in stores and tried to give them a ticket to heaven. It is necessary to revive not only normal schools, such as DOSAAF, but also the youth’s interest in technical creativity and further growth prospects.
    1. +3
      April 28 2018 09: 02
      Quote: Chichikov
      No school

      School was, but all poherili. "Swift", "Flight", "Bumblebee", "Bee", but a lot of them. I'm not talking about the Storm.
    2. +3
      April 28 2018 10: 28
      Quote: Chichikov
      Having experience, developments, design "schools" and the results of their work (Sukhoi, Yakovlev, Lavochkin, Ilyushin, Tupolev, Mikoyan, Myasishchev, Beriev, Polikarpov, Antonov and others), it is difficult to imagine that they were in UAV issues, "behind the planet all. "

      And you look - that the domestic industry offered MO as an UAV in the early 2000s. Remember the same "Tipchak" of 2007: a complex of 6 UAVs with a radius of 70 km and a horizontal TV camera (!) Required 4 KAMAZs to be deployed.
      However, nothing surprising - the military-industrial complex, using its monopoly, simply pushed into the army the old developments on the principle of "there will be no other".
    3. +3
      April 28 2018 14: 45
      Quote: Chichikov
      But once upon a time, they started to teach primitive UAVs in the circles of technical creativity. In 60-70, most of the boys, at least once, but bought models from shingles, parchment in stores and tried to give them a ticket to heaven. It is necessary to revive not only normal schools, such as DOSAAF, but also the youth’s interest in technical creativity and further growth prospects.

      The problem is not in building a glider, but in ensuring the correct electronic filling.
    4. +3
      April 28 2018 15: 00
      Having experience, developments, design "schools" and the results of their work (Sukhoi, Yakovlev, Lavochkin, Ilyushin, Tupolev, Mikoyan, Myasishchev, Beriev, Polikarpov, Antonov and others), it is difficult to imagine that they were in UAV issues, "behind the planet all "
      You have given the wrong names. Make a glider can be no problem. The problem is in engines, or rather in their complete absence. Since the days of the USSR, we have neglected small and inexpensive engines, for which neither the Stalin nor the Lenin Prizes were given.
      And the main restraining force now is the bureaucratic deterrence of small, private aviation, which primarily needs low-power engines. No demand, no supply, and hence low profitability of production.
  4. +13
    April 28 2018 08: 18
    The country that created Buran, who returned automatically, buys small planes from the Jews, because she herself cannot make them. Development.
    1. +1
      April 28 2018 08: 38
      * The country that created Buran, returned automatically * .... The country created the Army and Navy, which is respected in the World ... In just 17-20 years .... And what else is there * in the zasashnik * not even I imagine ... Do you think this is an Outpost achievement? For every foreign .... there is ... from multinational Russia ... So, quietly and stealthily, you will go further)))
      1. 0
        April 28 2018 08: 54
        Even this country did not make such a segment of technology and lagged behind in optics and communications ...
        1. +1
          April 28 2018 09: 03
          Quote: Zaurbek
          Even this country did not make such a segment of technology and lagged behind in optics and communications ...

          And the Elf, Mosquito, Kite, Bumblebee, Bee? Were they the wrong country?
          1. 0
            April 28 2018 09: 44
            And where are they all? In the Chechen war? If they were in service? The most modern analogue was the "bee." But among the Jews from the 70s this topic was vital and developed. Over the past 10 years, Russia has done very different things on this topic.
            1. 0
              April 28 2018 09: 58
              Quote: Zaurbek
              And where are they all? In the Chechen war? If they were in service? The most modern analogue was the "bee." But among the Jews from the 70s this topic was vital and developed. Over the past 10 years, Russia has done very different things on this topic.

              What does the Russian Federation and Chechnya have to do with it? It was about the USSR and its developments.
              1. 0
                April 28 2018 10: 00
                Yes, because in Chechnya there was what remained of the USSR — all the equipment and ammunition.
            2. 0
              April 29 2018 18: 06
              Quote: Zaurbek
              In the Chechen war? If they were in service?

              And what would change? But nothing.
        2. +1
          April 28 2018 09: 30
          Zaurbek- it’s good for you, you * are strong *, YOU * CAN * .... There are already a lot * of your * thereAnd where do you write from?
          1. +1
            April 28 2018 09: 45
            Strong is always better than weak!
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. +1
                April 28 2018 10: 01
                Do you complain from your own experience?
                1. +4
                  April 28 2018 10: 11
                  Is that in what sense? I can answer, you don’t ... I don’t hide from where I am, you’re hiding .... I hate Russian-speaking Bandera and guest workers, because of near and far abroad, and they don’t crawl with my Council, opinions about themselves and them weapons to their sites ....
                  1. +4
                    April 28 2018 10: 13
                    So you, my friend, are a nationalist and a denier of everything new ?! What are you better than Bandera Natsik then? Two of a Kind!
                    1. +2
                      April 28 2018 10: 19
                      You, dear * do not call me my friend, you are a foreigner and not of my faith ... This time! Two- I'm not a nationalist in your understanding))) And you still have not answered my questions! )))
                      1. +1
                        April 28 2018 10: 21
                        Which of us is a foreigner is a big question. And our faith is separate from the state and is not binding on everyone. Ask a specific question, get a specific answer.
                    2. Don
                      +2
                      April 28 2018 12: 13
                      Quote: Zaurbek
                      So you, my friend, are a nationalist and a denier of everything new ?! What are you better than Bandera Natsik then? Two of a Kind!

                      You're right. He is the same Bendera, only Russian hi
                      1. +2
                        April 28 2018 15: 38
                        And what is * my Bandera *? It’s you Vasya Russian, I’m Russian .. Do not confuse please ...
                      2. 0
                        April 29 2018 18: 09
                        Quote: Donskoy
                        He is the same Bendera, only Russian

                        Vlasovets?
                  2. +1
                    April 28 2018 10: 16
                    What is the subject of the dispute?
                    Totally Russian. The domestic version of the Outpost UAV will enter the troops in 2019.

                    Russian (Russian) drone! Already. Bought for Russian money from the Jews.
                    1. +3
                      April 28 2018 10: 22
                      The subject of the dispute is that you are a provocateur and this time .. Two- you did not answer my
                      questions .... But, I think that I should not conduct a conversation with you, the man who entered into a dispute with a woman, he becomes a woman. Good luck!
                      1. +1
                        April 28 2018 10: 28
                        Well, if you are a woman, I will not argue. Natsik Baba and I do not want to be a woman.
                      2. +1
                        April 29 2018 18: 10
                        Quote: Samosad
                        a man who has entered into a dispute with a woman himself becomes a woman

                        Mosk where are you going? Come back! I'm going to get it all!
    2. 0
      April 28 2018 08: 42
      Why reinvent the wheel, here I just bought it and made it of my components .20 years of decocracy under Yeltsin in which nothing developed and was created, but only everything collapsed were not in vain.
      1. +2
        April 28 2018 08: 55
        20 years of decocracy under Yeltsin

        This is from what, by what, even I forgot?
    3. +5
      April 28 2018 08: 50
      The country that created the blizzard has not been there for 30 years
      1. +1
        April 28 2018 10: 03
        If there are necessary technologies in the West or East (and they are cheaper and better and faster than ours), you need to buy them, implement them and then develop them. What did with this Outpost.
    4. -1
      April 28 2018 11: 25
      The USSR and Russia are not the same ...
      1. 0
        April 29 2018 18: 13
        Quote: cormorant
        The USSR and Russia are not the same ...

        What's the difference?
    5. 0
      April 28 2018 14: 56
      Quote: Eduard Petrov
      The country that created Buran, who returned automatically, buys small planes from the Jews, because she herself cannot make them. Development.

      It seems to me alone that there is a certain connection between the statement above and the inscription below?
      1. 0
        April 29 2018 18: 16
        Quote: alexsipin
        It seems to me alone that there is a certain connection between the statement above and the inscription below?

        It seems to you that in fact there is a direct connection with the US State Department. The propaganda technique of Western propaganda, if some strong country doesn’t do something simple (doesn’t produce UAVs, condoms or game parades), it sucks and all that.
  5. +6
    April 28 2018 08: 38
    Well, just the same person, we don’t know how to play football, we need to develop hockey !!!
    1. 0
      April 28 2018 10: 48
      Efficiency, simplicity of production and quality for you or Spectacular appearance on a piece of gold, your brain, what do you want to say with these pictures?
      1. 0
        April 29 2018 07: 57
        I wanted to say that they are both more beautiful and more effective a hundred times .. well and naturally more expensive, who argues? We lag behind the "partners" for many years ... wink That's what I wanted to say, and I will not catch up ...
        1. 0
          April 30 2018 14: 21
          Wanting is not harmful and you can Think of anything, but real life is a harsh and stubborn thing and shows that there is something. And you can think what you want and come up with a lot. And it’s not naturally more expensive, but at such a price that is not comparable with the results, It’s not overtaking, but simply not along the way.
          Such a gift is simply not needed.
  6. +4
    April 28 2018 08: 39
    Not to mention him!
    1. +1
      April 28 2018 08: 56
      The segment of small "Burned" artillery critically poorly shoots without UAVs, but instead of these you can send a plane. And now there are a lot of local conflicts in the yard.
  7. +3
    April 28 2018 08: 41
    But what about the Corsairs of the airplane and helicopter types?



  8. +4
    April 28 2018 08: 52
    The ROTAX-912 engine is not Russian at all.
    1. 0
      April 28 2018 11: 16
      Quote: Rusfaner
      The ROTAX-912 engine is not Russian at all.


      Especially in capital letters in the article: Totally Russian. The domestic version of the Outpost UAV will enter the troops in 2019.
      In response, the engine is that, Uncle Petya. . . . . to
      1. +2
        April 28 2018 11: 59
        The size of the letters does not prove anything. hi

        http://bastion-opk.ru/forpost/
        1. +1
          April 28 2018 12: 28
          The link says information for 2012-2017, and now what year and what year in the title?

          You are adequate and able to absorb information. How many times do you need to repeat the same thing so that the gray matter stirs?
  9. 0
    April 28 2018 09: 02
    stay in the air until 17 hours. The radius of the drone is about 250 km. .....rave!
    1. +5
      April 28 2018 10: 35
      Quote: sergei28
      stay in the air until 17 hours. The radius of the drone is about 250 km. .....rave!

      What do you dislike? This is not a plane - for UAVs of specific and radar reconnaissance with real-time data transmission, the radius of action is determined not by the fuel supply, but by the range of the onboard transmitting and transmitting complex. So all these 17 hours he will work within a radius of 250 km from the ground center.
  10. +2
    April 28 2018 09: 07
    We never learned to do UAVs ... Shame. Something went wrong in our education
    1. Don
      +1
      April 28 2018 12: 17
      Quote: Samara_63
      We never learned to do UAVs ... Shame. Something went wrong in our education

      This is far from education. The problem is in the system of power that exists with 1991. See the root hi
    2. 0
      April 29 2018 18: 19
      Quote: Samara_63
      We never learned to do UAVs ... Shame. Something went wrong in our education

      The point is not in industry. Industry will do what they order! The army does not know what it is needed.
  11. +3
    April 28 2018 09: 09
    the share of domestic components is approximately 25%
    1. +1
      April 28 2018 10: 18
      Totally Russian. Domestic version of the UAV "Outpost" will enter the troops in the 2019 year
    2. +1
      April 28 2018 10: 51
      Quote: sergei28
      the share of domestic components is approximately 25%


      Read the scribbler article.
  12. +1
    April 28 2018 09: 20
    https://topwar.ru/34120-suhoy-v-2018-godu-predsta
    vit-20-tonnyy-udarnyy-bespilotnik.html
    and where is this ?? 2013
    1. 0
      April 28 2018 10: 53
      How does an Outpost article fit into your question?
  13. 0
    April 28 2018 09: 23
    If the technical specifications are good, then the appearance is so-so
    1. 0
      April 28 2018 10: 52
      Efficiency, simplicity of production and quality for you, or spectacular appearance on a piece of gold, the brain, then turn on what they wanted to say?
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +1
    April 28 2018 10: 31
    Zaurbek,
    )))
  16. +4
    April 28 2018 11: 14
    IAI Searcher 2 was adopted by Israel in 1998, after 20 years "the Russian armed forces Forpost UAV will enter the Russian armed forces", this is a great achievement, there is definitely something to be proud of
    1. Don
      0
      April 28 2018 12: 20
      Believe me, with the current government this is actually an achievement. Degradation has long acquired an irreversible character.
      1. 0
        April 29 2018 08: 04
        There’s a conversation about UAVs, and not about your work, the respected “navalnoskosobchakogrudinkin” stop sucking in your white-tape idea, got it already !!! Everyone has long understood that you are the usual “puting” ...
  17. 0
    April 28 2018 11: 19
    Since 2012, they have been localizing ... And he was not the most advanced when buying from Israel, it seems, given that Israel does not squander technology. Is our Outpost so modern. As it is?
  18. +2
    April 28 2018 12: 47
    And the result of this reengineering will be like with the rest of the Soviet / Russian copies?
    1. 0
      April 28 2018 13: 06
      For example, Christie’s tank?
    2. 0
      April 28 2018 19: 15
      Yes, this piece will replace the Corsair UAV with the same range and even greater carrying capacity (200 kg versus 150 kg for the syrcher) + shock functions, the front corsair already has 2 big stars, which means 2 targets hit ...
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. -1
    April 29 2018 18: 33
    Quote: Eduard Petrov
    The country that created Buran, who returned automatically, buys small planes from the Jews, because she herself cannot make them. Development.

    this country has long been gone ... the specialists who created all this - left, died or killed ... the documentation - was thrown out, sold, stolen ... The whole world still uses Soviet developments, which at least have saved billions of dollars in costs.
    The Chinese are generally practically free, from scratch created a space program on Soviet developments ...
  21. -1
    April 29 2018 18: 42
    Quote: _Jack_
    IAI Searcher 2 was adopted by Israel in 1998, after 20 years "the Russian armed forces Forpost UAV will enter the Russian armed forces", this is a great achievement, there is definitely something to be proud of

    given that in the 5th column of the passport they will have ... completely "Russian" UAVs will soon be jammed and fly away to their historical homeland ... However, the trend!
  22. The comment was deleted.