Military Review

Nuclear weapons - the guarantor of security. Bondarev did not approve the plan to denudarize the DPRK

50
Before talking about the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, it is necessary to ensure the security of the DPRK in other ways. This was stated by the head of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security Viktor Bondarev, his press service said.


Nuclear weapons - the guarantor of security. Bondarev did not approve the plan to denudarize the DPRK


The parliamentarian pointed out that the unification of North and South Korea into one state is indeed possible. According to him, there are serious reasons to believe that the agreements reached at the Korean summit on the termination of mutual hostility will be realized, and will not remain just declarations.

But it’s premature to speak about the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, in my opinion. Nuclear weapon - the guarantor of security of the DPRK from the Anglo-Saxon aggression and expansion, the guarantor of the sovereignty of this country
- pointed Bondarev.

Therefore, we must first ensure the security of North Korea in other ways, in order to prevent the invasion of the United States and its allies in this country under imaginary pretexts, as is often practiced. And only after that can we talk about denuclearization
- noted the parliamentarian.

At the same time, he did not rule out that the United States would insist on forcing this process, to put pressure on the DPRK, including through the Republic of Korea, so that Pyongyang began the disposal of nuclear weapons.

Kim Jong-un acted wisely and cautiously, promising as proof of the desire for denuclearization only to abandon the test of ballistic missiles: after all, this does not mean the elimination of the nuclear stock already existing in the DPRK
- pointed out a member of the Chamber of Regions.

Bondarev also noted that the unconditional positive outcome of the talks in Panmunjom was the intention of the two North and South Korea to make peace.

This is truly historical the decision that the Korean people have been waiting for so many years. Koreans are waiting for the unification of the country, just as the German people at one time were waiting for the fall of the Berlin Wall
- said the parliamentarian.

At the same time, according to him, it is early to say in what form and how it will be implemented. He did not rule out that the union will be on a confederal basis.

But the union is in the interests of the people of both countries. For us, this is also significant. Stabilization of the situation in the East Asian region is welcomed by Russia, because our border runs alongside North Korea, which means our national interests are concentrated there.
- noted a member of the Federation Council.
Photos used:
https://www.pnp.ru/
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. himRa
    himRa April 28 2018 07: 18
    +6
    Well already parliamentarians scratch:
    The parliamentarian pointed out that the unification of North and South Korea into one state is indeed possible. According to him, there are serious reasons to believe that the agreements reached at the Korean summit on the termination of mutual hostility will be realized, and will not remain just declarations.
    1. Sergey985
      Sergey985 April 28 2018 07: 22
      +3
      What did everyone fall for on this declaration? Kim the whole world is just a troll. He will not refuse nuclear weapons. Fifteen years later, another “historical” meeting will be held. Good intentions will be proclaimed again!
      1. Yrec
        Yrec April 28 2018 08: 39
        +5
        That's for sure. With Bondarev it’s good to walk along the minefield - he always runs ahead. Eun showed the whole world that he is not very simple. As global practice shows: promising does not mean getting married.
    2. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii April 28 2018 07: 28
      +4
      Greetings Raheem hi Does America need this? They would have considered this issue on the contrary, and a completely different scenario is obtained, which is not so comforting. It is clear that these undertakings need to be supported, but soon they will forget about it or make them forget (they will conduct joint exercises), and we will continue to scratch our tongue in energy.
      1. himRa
        himRa April 28 2018 07: 37
        +5
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        Does America need this?

        Greetings Vitaliy! drinks
        The fact of the matter is that the unification of Koreas is not necessary for anyone!
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        and we will continue to scratch the tongue with energy

        And who knows what is going on at night on railway tracks, roads and at sea !? wink survives as something ,, blocked ,, North Korea ... belay
        And I consider such statements of our politicians just a PR, it would be better if they were silent ... not serious, it’s like that ...
        1. ul_vitalii
          ul_vitalii April 28 2018 08: 04
          +3
          drinks I agree completely, Raheem smile
    3. Herculesic
      Herculesic April 28 2018 07: 35
      +1
      Raheem hi this is the rare case when a parliamentarian said that the peninsula can and should live peacefully! But, only that one should not remain troops or bases of the USA! Otherwise, we or the Chinese must also create our own military base as opposed to them, opposite the US base!
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 28 2018 07: 19
    +1
    Here I agree with him! Eun will fall into the net by the United States, and South Korea will simply be swallowed up by South with all the negative consequences! It’s impossible like this, abruptly solving the problems of unification, to abandon the means of security of the nuclear weapon state.
    1. BZTM
      BZTM April 28 2018 07: 30
      +3
      Aha-schaz right Eun and refused nuclear weapons ... laughing There are no fools.
  3. Kleber
    Kleber April 28 2018 07: 27
    +2
    Nuclear weapons are the guarantor of the DPRK security against Anglo-Saxon aggression and expansion, the guarantor of the sovereignty of this country


    But nuclear weapons of the DPRK after unification may be a threat to the security of the Russian Federation. Nobody knows which side after the unification Korea will look. They have a lot of resentment against us.
    1. BZTM
      BZTM April 28 2018 07: 32
      +4
      What insults? For the fact that in the 50s they didn’t let them bomb them at all in the Stone Age? request
      1. Kleber
        Kleber April 28 2018 07: 37
        +1
        Quote: BZTM
        What insults? For the fact that in the 50s they didn’t let them bomb them at all in the Stone Age? request


        Well, in the Korean War we put up only one air corps, but could help more substantially. But their grievances are now in the Russian Federation over military and economic cooperation. North Korean newspapers sometimes print on InOSMI - at least in one article they spoke positively about the Russian Federation .... only insult.
        1. himRa
          himRa April 28 2018 07: 45
          +3
          Quote: Kleber
          Well, in the Korean War, we put up only one air corps, but could help more substantial

          We ... well, then you could be !!!
          The grief of analytics is soaring !!!
          A story to read a little? Or do you think Stalin was an adventurer?
          What a childish babble !!!
          1. Kleber
            Kleber April 28 2018 07: 49
            0
            Stalin was against the Korean War, but he was drawn into it (like China).

            As for the knowledge of history, the grief of analysts and babble .... this is off topic.
            1. himRa
              himRa April 28 2018 08: 21
              +3
              In the subject, not in the subject ... contradict yourself!
              but could help more substantial.

              A brief analysis is enough
              USSR for 1947 and the general analysis of the world for the same year!
              Stalin was against the Korean War, but him into it (like China) pulled

              Oh, nothing you argue ... you don’t know the story!
              Who pulled in whom?
              maybe Mao went to Moscow and convinced Stalin to throw off the Americans from the Korean peninsula?
              And answer once you know something there Why was Stalin opposed?
              If it’s interesting and you want to speak seriously, READ before and do not suck your opinion out of your finger
              1. Kleber
                Kleber April 28 2018 11: 47
                0
                [quote =himRa]A brief analysis is enough
                USSR for 1947 and the general analysis of the world for the same year!
                [Quote]

                Do you have enough statistics from the official bodies of Ukraine for 2014-2017 in terms of population? For example, I do not.

                [quote =himRa]Oh, nothing you argue ... you don’t know the story![/ Quote]

                One famous Pole said: “If you remove all the untruth from history, this does not mean that only truth will remain there. There may be nothing left at all”

                So the story is different for everyone .... not looking at the fact that you and I studied it back in the Soviet Union and continued after it.

                PS: no need to be rude .... this I can do no worse than you.
                1. himRa
                  himRa April 28 2018 17: 53
                  +1
                  Well try without rudeness .... do not respond (ignore) is also not polite ..
                  You did not answer the question:
                  Why was Stalin opposed the participation of the USSR in Korea? What do I agree ... so why?
                  Officially, the USSR did not participate but made the maximum of what it could !!!
                  And it’s incorrect to show that little was done or didn’t fight the Americans !!! and speaks of ignorance of the situation, even though we didn’t have nuclear weapons, and the Americans already had 10 or more charges and their delivery vehicles !!!
                  1. Kleber
                    Kleber April 29 2018 03: 41
                    0
                    Quote: himRa
                    You did not answer the question: Why was Stalin opposed the participation of the USSR in Korea? What do I agree ... so why?


                    The Korean War could easily go to World War III. The USSR was not ready for World War III.
    2. 210ox
      210ox April 28 2018 07: 33
      +4
      If you decide to unite, then nuclear weapons must be destroyed. However, before the real unification there is a "huge distance" And as for insults ... Koreans are very pragmatic people and if you mean a downed Boeing .. Was there a boy at all?
      Quote: Kleber
      Nuclear weapons are the guarantor of the DPRK security against Anglo-Saxon aggression and expansion, the guarantor of the sovereignty of this country


      But nuclear weapons of the DPRK after unification may be a threat to the security of the Russian Federation. Nobody knows which side after the unification Korea will look. They have a lot of resentment against us.
      1. Kleber
        Kleber April 28 2018 07: 42
        0
        Quote: 210ox
        If you decide to unite, then nuclear weapons must be destroyed.


        And they want to destroy? I doubt ....
      2. Kleber
        Kleber April 28 2018 08: 22
        0
        Quote: 210ox
        And as for insults ...


        Russia, bordering the Korean Peninsula, calls the DPRK ICBMs a medium-range ballistic missile with a flight altitude of 681 kilometers and a range of 732 kilometers. This is completely unthinkable.


        Even the United States, which most prefer not to recognize the success of our ICBMs, dare not deny and truthfully accept this fact.


        The big question is why Russia’s DPRK ICBM is perceived by Russia, a country very close to the DPRK, as a medium-range ballistic missile.


        Another question is why Russia, which will be unhappy if it is recognized as the second in the military sphere, is making desperate efforts to make its far-fetched allegations believable, even abusing the name of the Ministry of Defense.
        Newspaper KCNA Watch, DPRK.

        This is me, for an example of their insults.
    3. Retired2012
      Retired2012 April 28 2018 09: 33
      +1
      So, after all, Israel has many insults to Russia ..... and Israel has an atomic bomb, they can throw it at Russia ..... Koreans are not nearly worse than a Jew .....
  4. rocket757
    rocket757 April 28 2018 07: 31
    +2
    This is all on the topic - Pitchfork on the water written! -
    Shaw guessing, it is necessary to work .... if ours have not forgotten how to completely ??? unfortunately very similar to sho!
  5. Eduard petrov
    Eduard petrov April 28 2018 07: 38
    +1
    Without us, everything is pretty good there and no one asks us, especially Bondarev. America and China decide everything, and we have the role of observer, no more. Another geopolitical victory.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. anjey
    anjey April 28 2018 07: 53
    +1
    Many here on the site shouted that he’s a horse with eggs as opposed to our GDP, and it looks like an American dark horse, indeed, like our hunchback traitor, because of Yunov’s hype and ponte with missiles, the Yankees deployed the TAAD system in Kazakhstan, and now he sharply handed back, so who does he play the question is, but we’ll find out the answer soon ...
    1. Monarchist
      Monarchist April 28 2018 08: 27
      +1
      Andrei, you took my tongue off: we have many bastards from Eun, “a tough and not frightening fighter. How he“ bent down ”Trump.“ In fact, he is WATER.
      1. anjey
        anjey April 28 2018 08: 49
        0
        He also took into doubt his pathos and sometimes even provocative statements ....
  8. Berkut154
    Berkut154 April 28 2018 07: 59
    +2
    Listening to him, I wonder what type of aircraft he controlled and how? And then there’s a video where he has the word DENUCLIRIZATION laughing pronounces?
  9. bald
    bald April 28 2018 08: 17
    0
    It did not work to put knees with scarecrows, they decided through the UK. Definitely the leader of South Korea, or his entourage, received valuable guidance. Without soap, no matter how.
  10. Monarchist
    Monarchist April 28 2018 08: 18
    0
    Quote: Sergey985
    What did everyone fall for on this declaration? Kim the whole world is just a troll. He will not refuse nuclear weapons. Fifteen years later, another “historical” meeting will be held. Good intentions will be proclaimed again!

    I agree that all of these declarations can be a "diploma."
  11. Chichikov
    Chichikov April 28 2018 08: 22
    +1
    Stop crying for someone else’s plans. What is wrong with the two Koreas joining together? Will the world become worse and more dangerous? And where does it mean "Anglo-Saxon aggression, expansion and sovereignty", that all North Koreans will be withdrawn and executed by Anglo-Saxons, and a united Korea will lose its sovereignty? This is mononation, the opposite of multinationality, - representatives of one nation, which was divided by geopolitical players.
  12. MadCat
    MadCat April 28 2018 08: 31
    0
    Now it’s clear whose ears stick out after the crisis, as soon as the peace negotiations began, all the fighters for world peace climbed out. Still squeak about double standards. negative
  13. Monarchist
    Monarchist April 28 2018 08: 34
    +1
    Quote: himRa
    Quote: Kleber
    Well, in the Korean War, we put up only one air corps, but could help more substantial

    We ... well, then you could be !!!
    The grief of analytics is soaring !!!
    A story to read a little? Or do you think Stalin was an adventurer?
    What a childish babble !!!

    I agree Stalin also looks like an adventurer like a hippopotamus on Volochkova
  14. dojjdik
    dojjdik April 28 2018 08: 46
    0
    the latest Jewish idiotic word "nucleation" continues to hammer into our brains
  15. Strips
    Strips April 28 2018 09: 04
    0
    Another state is moving away from the influence of Russia and China to the west.
    Instead of using its strong influence on the DPRK, Russia and China pulled the cat ...

    Russia and China could take the DPRK for a long time by placing bases there in exchange for the DPRK's renunciation of nuclear weapons.

    Now, judging by all this statement, Russia is as if hinting that it could be a guarantor one way or another.

    Instead of acting on time, Russia is now trying to keep the DPRK from moving west.
    1. Retired2012
      Retired2012 April 28 2018 09: 39
      +1
      Today, for example, there are Russian and Chinese bases, tomorrow they are not, but there is a nuclear bomb, there is something to protect the Korean people .....
      1. Strips
        Strips April 28 2018 10: 01
        0
        And from what to protect? From the magnificent life that is in South Korea?
        Kim has so many weapons without nuclear weapons that if anything in South Korea and not only hundreds of thousands of people die.
        This is not Iraq and Libya. These countries can live well if they unite or begin to live in peace.
        1. Retired2012
          Retired2012 April 28 2018 11: 22
          +1
          The Germans live together for a long time, but they are still divided into eastern and western ..... and the standard of living is different ........ So in Korea it will be-rich and poor ....... And the poor with a bomb ....
    2. alexddd
      alexddd April 28 2018 10: 42
      0
      Yeah! As we defend Syria, we defend DPRK. There will be Americans tomahawks firing on the DPRK, and our liberals will scream all over the Internet that we don’t want a nuclear war, and that’s why, and therefore let the Koreans do naughty things to them, they won’t save world peace, and who else thinks those machine guns in the teeth got off the sofas and defended the DPRK. The song is the only one of this type of people.
  16. AlexanderVP
    AlexanderVP April 28 2018 09: 28
    +2
    The only reliable and correct guarantee of security for S. Korea is to finally throw off the dictatorial regime and unite with South Korea.
    1. Retired2012
      Retired2012 April 28 2018 11: 27
      +2
      And the dictatorial regime of the USA in South Korea is the guarantor of peace and tranquility for all Koreans, apparently?
      1. AlexanderVP
        AlexanderVP April 28 2018 11: 48
        0
        Quote: Retreat2012
        And the dictatorial regime of the USA in South Korea is the guarantor of peace and tranquility for all Koreans, apparently?

        And what is the US dictatorial regime in South Korea?
        Maybe the USA imposed ten obligatory and only possible hairstyles on them, as in the DPRK? :))))
        1. Retired2012
          Retired2012 April 28 2018 14: 34
          +1
          There is no need to talk about hairstyles - there are many bald, hairy and bald everywhere ..... There are no gays in South Korea, as well as porn magazines, democracy, there is EVERYTHING !!!!! In North Korea, this is not the same as in Russia ..... if there is such a thing, underground, isn't it?
          1. AlexanderVP
            AlexanderVP April 28 2018 14: 54
            0
            What does porno journalists have to do with it? You answer the question: what is the dictatorial regime of the United States in South Korea?
            1. Retired2012
              Retired2012 April 29 2018 00: 55
              +1
              Under the foot of the states of the southerners .... under occupation ..... Northerners-FREE -.....
  17. Old26
    Old26 April 28 2018 10: 08
    +2
    Quote: dojjdik
    the latest Jewish idiotic word "nucleation" continues to hammer into our brains

    Already this word is Jewish? Well connoisseur !!!!

    Quote: Sergey985
    What did everyone fall for on this declaration? Kim the whole world is just a troll. He will not refuse nuclear weapons. Fifteen years later, another “historical” meeting will be held. Good intentions will be proclaimed again!

    He can do anything. But the condition for lifting sanctions from it is precisely the denuclearization of North Korea. He may not do this, but then everything will remain in its place and not the fact that it will not be removed with time.
    The agreement with South Korea is at least some opportunity to get out of the vicious circle. And Eun understands this well. It is also ready for denuclearization, since it most likely has secured a "roof" in the form of the PRC (and, possibly, in the future, Russia), which can provide a guarantee against external aggression.
    But the process will not be easy and long. Not one of the parties does not agree to be swallowed by the other. Southerners do not want to have a political system, like North Korea, Northerners do not want to have a political system, like in the south, because then the top of the party will lose all the privileges that they have now
  18. Old26
    Old26 April 28 2018 10: 43
    0
    Quote: Tiras
    Russia and China could take the DPRK for a long time by placing bases there in exchange for the DPRK's renunciation of nuclear weapons.

    The question is different. Would North Korea want this. But nuclear weapons are a toy for leaders of such a plan as Eun and the like. And they can’t do anything to a serious adversary, and it’s a pity to refuse. And so you’ll be considered a “tough kid”

    Quote: Tiras
    Kim has so many weapons without nuclear weapons that if anything in South Korea and not only hundreds of thousands of people die.

    There are a lot of weapons, but if you look at the nomenclature, that’s it. that he will be capable of something, you begin to doubt. No, of course they will put a lot of people, but alas, they will not be able to achieve something serious.
    For example, according to the Military Balance-2018 directory, there are about 5100 in the DPRK ground forces
    MLRS. Of these, from 3500 to 4000 MLRS of 107 mm caliber and firing range of 7-7 km. The militia is also armed with the BMZ-10 Katyusha MLRS. There are many, but which ones ...
  19. net0103net
    net0103net April 28 2018 11: 45
    +2
    Well, at least one person who has the opportunity to go to the podium takes the brains with him to work. You can’t disarm North Korea, they will have neither peace, nor prosperity, nor clarity, as now. It is a pity the USSR is no longer there - we would have to support them as in past times it was ...
  20. vladimirasha
    vladimirasha April 28 2018 13: 27
    0
    Kick pidocrats from there and you can unite like Vietnam
  21. Kleber
    Kleber April 29 2018 03: 40
    0
    Quote: himRa
    You did not answer the question: Why was Stalin opposed the participation of the USSR in Korea? What do I agree ... so why?


    The Korean War could easily go to World War III. The USSR was not ready for World War III.