"One left!" American "expert" is confident in the victory of the USA in the third world

116
On the independent non-commercial portal The Conversation, another study of the next “expert” appeared, in which the author declares that the USA possessing “enormous capabilities” will be able to defeat Russia in a possible Third World War without using nuclear weapons. weapons.

"One left!" American "expert" is confident in the victory of the USA in the third world




As the author writes, the US Navy has 4 thousand Tomahawk cruise missiles, while the US Navy and Air Force currently supply 5 thousand conventional JASSM cruise missiles with a range from 320 to 960 km. While Russia and China allegedly do not have anything like it in quantity or quality, "that could really threaten the mainland USA," the newspaper notes.

The same applies to the sea forces. Because of the two Russian frigates and small ships stationed off the coast of Syria, there was a lot of hype. At that time, as soon as France has 20 warships and aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean Sea, and regular US forces in the area are six destroyers equipped with dozens of cruise missiles and anti-missile systems.
- writes Plesh.

He also notes that the Chinese fleet also allegedly does not pose a serious threat to the United States.

Yes, the Chinese Navy continues to grow, but according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, its strength is still fleets Japan and Taiwan, while the United States has 19 aircraft carriers around the world, including naval assault ships
- noted in the material.

It also implies that American leaders allegedly “are able to eliminate Russia's deterrent nuclear factor with a powerful blow from conventional weapons, with the support of antimissile defense”

This is not an easy task. To destroy the Russian nuclear missiles before they are launched, the US military must first silence the Russian radar and command communications, possibly using cyber attacks. In this case, about 200 stationary and 200 mobile land rockets, a dozen Russian missile submarines and bombers would have to be destroyed. All missiles that will still be effective after this should also be destroyed.
- writes Plesh, at the same time noting that “Russia has no opportunity to survive such an attack”.

Remembering the Russian rockets in the mines and those that are transported by rail and road, the author of the material notes that they "can be hit by several types of missiles that are delivered almost imperceptibly by American aircraft."
116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    April 26 2018 16: 09
    I hope theirs in the forefront?
    Plesch writes, at the same time noting that "Russia has no opportunity to survive such an attack."
    Do not ... read the story .... theirsperd
    1. +65
      April 26 2018 16: 12
      Why print the ravings of a madman, such experts in the spring and autumn are increasing tenfold.
      1. +13
        April 26 2018 16: 14
        Quote: Going
        Why print the ravings of a madman, such experts in the spring and autumn are increasing tenfold.

        I hope that the command does not listen to such ...! Or be trouble ...
        The military doctrine of the Russian Federation says in white Russian that Russia will use nuclear weapons in case of a threat to the very existence of our Motherland.
        Maybe these downs are hoping that after several powerful attempts we will surrender ... But we know that, no. And history proves the opposite!
        1. +1
          April 26 2018 16: 16
          Well, someone lowered a mitt to him.
          1. +45
            April 26 2018 16: 20
            Americans will miss the fourth world for technical reasons smile
            1. +6
              April 26 2018 16: 34
              Quote: Thrall
              Americans will miss the fourth world for technical reasons smile


              I killed thrall .... I haven’t cried laughter for a long time good good
          2. +5
            April 26 2018 17: 35
            The expert has Ukrainian roots !!! Definitely.
        2. +6
          April 26 2018 16: 37
          "One left!" American "expert" is confident in the victory of the USA in the third world

          Not a very smart article.
          1. +4
            April 26 2018 17: 03
            Quote: figvam
            Not a very smart article

            "What could really threaten the mainland of the United States?"
            He just wants to sit out in the mainland USA and he’s on the drum of life not in the mainland ... naive ...
            1. +7
              April 26 2018 20: 28
              Quote: NIKNN
              He just wants to sit out in the mainland USA and he’s on the drum of life not in the mainland ... naive ...

              It seems to me that in the current alignment of forces, the chances of surviving in the rear, on the mainland, are much less than in the first wave of the Navy. And with a cyber attack on the radar, he generally drove under the table. All serious networks in Russia today are built not intersecting with the Internet. How is he going to attack? Satanic curse?
              1. +7
                April 26 2018 20: 30
                Quote: ARES623
                It seems to me that in the current alignment of forces, the chances of surviving in the rear, on the mainland, are much less than in the first wave of the Navy.

                Try to explain to them ... the invincible poor fellow ... children only believe in fairy tales, they raised these evil ones, we still feel sorry for the bun ...
                1. +4
                  April 26 2018 20: 38
                  Quote: NIKNN
                  brought these evil

                  USA (Anglo-Saxon world) - a cancerous tumor of mankind. Obviously, a surgical method of treatment is inevitable, otherwise the whole civilization is over.
                  1. +2
                    April 26 2018 20: 46
                    Quote: ARES623
                    Obviously, a surgical method of treatment is inevitable, otherwise the whole civilization will end

                    That would be clear to them ... what They believe that they will first be asked. and listen to the opinion ...
                    1. +2
                      April 26 2018 20: 51
                      Quote: NIKNN
                      That would be clear to them ...

                      Judging by the reaction of the rabid dog Matis to Gerasimov’s warning, there are those who understand something. True, not the fact that there are many ....
                      1. +2
                        April 26 2018 20: 56
                        Quote: ARES623
                        is not a fact,

                        Not a fact ... Although naive ... or drug-stubborn ... but I think not to the same extent that I would not understand .... I can’t pick up the words that I feel a civilization has reached an impasse ... like disowns these zombies, maybe we’ll survive, although I haven’t seen in one science fiction film that someone agreed with the zombies, they’ll only destroy them everywhere ... request
        3. +3
          April 26 2018 16: 56
          The American "expert" is confident in the US victory in the third world

          if such "smart thoughts" wander in the environment of their establishment. And also seeing THEIR "justification of the need for" like "Healy Likely", etc. etc., when Orwell is today EVERYTHING ...
          no doubt about it. Their world is crazy ...

          Of course, they also have sober heads, including and in the pentagon. BUT ... THEY are all incline ours to the "agreement": "we will tell you everything and show the goals for the strike, and you will not interfere ..." Ours - agree ...
          "The generals do not want to fight ... They are already doing so well" (c) one of the curators-navigators

          Quote: Logall
          I hope that the command does not listen to such ...! Or be trouble ...
          In the military doctrine of the Russian Federation it is written in Russian in white, that Russia will use nuclear weapons in the event of a threat to the very existence of our Fatherland.

          I would like to believe ...
          But ...
          Seeing how they missed TWO blows with axes, more and more doubts ...
      2. +2
        April 26 2018 16: 17
        Quote: Going
        Why print the ravings of a madman, such experts in the spring and autumn are increasing tenfold.

        Need to shoot))))
      3. +9
        April 26 2018 16: 22
        He ran a gallop across Europe, a so-so surveyor, once again showed a primitive in presenting information to the unlucky western man. That's how we will defeat them, they thought, and went on to eat sausages with shanks and drink a beer. smile
      4. 0
        April 26 2018 16: 30
        Normal, right expert. The greater the difference in understanding of danger between the majority and military professionals, the smaller the military budget
      5. +5
        April 26 2018 16: 57
        This is a certain analogue of the "Amerz cheer patriot" and the follower of Prince Menshikov in the American way ..
        Quote: Going
        Why print the ravings of a madman, such experts in the spring and autumn are increasing tenfold.
      6. +4
        April 26 2018 17: 02
        The trouble is that such nonsense is starting to sound more and more often. Moreover, such experts are sure - since they do not use nuclear weapons, then Russia should not ....
      7. +1
        April 26 2018 23: 54
        Quote: Going
        Why print the ravings of a madman, such experts in the spring and autumn are increasing tenfold.

        He is right, absolutely. In the event that Russia will sit and watch how it is bombed.
    2. +5
      April 26 2018 16: 14
      I wish he slept what he smokes! Or drinking some kind of infection!
      1. +5
        April 26 2018 16: 21
        Its over and do not know where to get it?
        What kind of comment is this? We are talking about a possible attack by the United States ... Their brains are invading aggression against the Russian Federation, they are preparing public opinion, and you just need someone to pour out ...
        1. +6
          April 26 2018 16: 34
          Yes, such nonsense, even commenting is ridiculous. We’ve already disassembled a hundred times that the concept of a disarming strike will not work in relation to Russia, and in particular it was sarcasm. The article was written by the not-so-distant "expert", and you immediately saw the danger!
          1. +3
            April 26 2018 16: 42
            Quote: Rostovchanin
            Yes, such nonsense even funny comment

            When there is nothing to comment, you can abstain!
            And the Yankees cannot be convinced of the futility of their plans ... How to abandon the idea of ​​absolute, exclusive dominance! They never waged real wars, where - "either you or you." Only local showdowns were conducted, where the price of losing is leaving the foreign territory, and not losing your own ...
            They are well aware that Russia will not start the war first, that it will not impose its will. That does not make plans for an attack, only protection. What they willingly use ...
            1. +4
              April 26 2018 16: 53
              The whole west is obsessed with "unacceptable damage." Their analysts have long considered everything, as well as ours. Nobody will forbid cheating them out of cheeks, so let their pride amuse themselves, thinking people do not pay attention to these cheeks. Sorry, but I love to laugh since childhood.
        2. +6
          April 26 2018 17: 16
          Quote: Logall
          We are talking about a possible attack by the United States ... Their brains are invading aggression against the Russian Federation, they are preparing public opinion, and you just need someone to dump it on.

          Sanya Zdrav Be Brother drinks You believe no, this has been happening a long time ago, and since 2014 has turned to the fullest and why now panic and hide our heads in the sand? We are doing our job, they are our own, we also have a lot of haters, although this one has surpassed everyone
          Flash.

          Some kind of Pole, their level of inadequacy is off scale. drinks
          Quote: Rostovchanin
          The article was written by the not-so-distant "expert", and you immediately saw the danger!

          Well, this "expert" from the series, who used to stand up, has the dressing gown of the head physician of a psychiatric dispensary. hi
  2. +7
    April 26 2018 16: 10
    How would I explain to the "partners" in Europe that a unilateral mess would not work. Nuclear weapons will be used. And in this case, Russia has no choice but to send tanks to Lisbon. In European cities to populate our surviving population, and send lovely Europeans to deactivate and restore our cities.
    1. +3
      April 26 2018 16: 15
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      And in this case, Russia has no choice but to send tanks to Lisbon. In European cities to populate our surviving population, and send lovely Europeans to deactivate and restore our cities.

      Or maybe just cut it out? wassat
      Let them read about the invasion of the Huns carefully again wassat
      These rams would at least calculate how much they need to guarantee, “knock out” the tundra and taiga laughing
  3. +1
    April 26 2018 16: 12
    He would write fiction ...
    1. +4
      April 26 2018 17: 12
      I’m afraid that after the pearl “while the United States has 19 aircraft carriers around the world” it’s not fiction, it’s a fairy tale.
  4. +2
    April 26 2018 16: 13
    They are quite capable! They have more resources. Yes, and we have compradors in power. But I would not advise amers on our territories. Comprador power with the oligarchs and so will run back to them.
    1. +4
      April 26 2018 16: 48
      Quote: andrej-shironov
      They are quite capable! They have more resources.

      This Plesh writes not only about Russia, but also about China. And we and China will have more resources. In general, there will be more people with China together with us than in the whole of NATO. Mr. Plesch comes up.
      1. +2
        April 26 2018 17: 33
        Quote: Mordvin 3
        and we will have more populations with China than in all of NATO.

        Haberdashery and cardinal - this is power! hi
        1. 0
          April 26 2018 17: 52
          lol Alexei, the answer to Vladimir was removed from the language.
          1. +5
            April 26 2018 20: 08
            Alexey, the answer to Vladimir was removed from the language

            A foolish answer, even a very stupid one.
            When one of the two has the most powerful strategic nuclear forces in the world and the other has the largest land army, when one has the largest armored forces and the other has artillery, who is their cardinal and who is the haberdasher?
            Well, it is obvious that to win the war from the USA with acceptable damage neither the Russian Federation nor China will succeed alone, but in the union this still needs to be calculated.
            1. +1
              April 26 2018 20: 14
              Oh my God! Vladimir! How old are you that you still measure your tails? With those strategic nuclear forces that the US and Russia have, there will be no survivors !!!! Think about it.
              1. +5
                April 26 2018 20: 43
                With those strategic nuclear forces that the US and Russia have, there will be no survivors !!!!

                On this occasion, there are different opinions, but about the idea that you liked so much about the "cardinal and the haberdasher" in the context of the article UNCONDITIONAL STUPIDITY
                1. +1
                  April 27 2018 08: 19
                  smile This phrase is ideal for people like you, accustomed to measure their tails like they are in a computer game and they have 9 lives.
  5. +2
    April 26 2018 16: 14
    Having a lot does not mean winning! Hitler boasted of the same thing and German soldiers, unlike American soldiers, knew how to fight and not bad !!!
    1. 0
      April 26 2018 16: 19
      That's only in the summer and winter of 41 USSR in the balance of oars from defeat.
      1. +5
        April 26 2018 16: 27
        Quote: Vadim237
        That's only in the summer and winter of 41 USSR in the balance of oars from defeat.

        They do not know our tactical device:
        when we step back we go forward!
        wink
      2. +7
        April 26 2018 16: 38
        Quote: Vadim237
        That's only in the summer and winter of 41 USSR in the balance of oars from defeat.

        I know this hair, how is it in rusky? Oh tank troes! smile
      3. +5
        April 26 2018 20: 18
        That's only in the summer and winter of the 41st USSR in the balance happy from defeat.

        Yes truly a comment from the victim of modern education.
        And literacy ("cheerful" from the word cheerful?).
        And in fact (just look at the map to assess the chances of the Wehrmacht).
        None of the simulations (and there were a great many of them) did not give the Reich victory in the Second World War in the event of an attack on the USSR and a war on 2 fronts. Elementary resources were not enough. So if we hadn’t held Moscow, the war would have ended anyway in Berlin, only not at 45 but at 46 or 47.
        And in general, that such a terrible threatened the USSR WINTER 41 years - from the beginning of December until the spring of 41, the Wehrmacht did not plan anything fateful.
  6. +4
    April 26 2018 16: 16
    Such experts need to be judged.
    And those who chose them as experts and even more so.
    In the third world - there will be no winners, well, not many will survive the exchange of nuclear missiles. And those who survive this hell will have to wait for a worse fate - the Stone Age on the nuclear ashes.
    For in our country, any large-scale conflict will lead precisely to nuclear war, and it is unnecessary to expect that the opponent will not apply it.
    And having heard such experts here, one claw would comb one place, to play a major war game.
    1. 0
      April 26 2018 16: 47
      Quote: viralig
      Such experts need to be judged.
      And those who chose them as experts and even more so.
      And having heard such experts here, one claw would comb one place, to play a major war game.

      Does anyone choose them? Some kind of snotty schoolboy or patient in the neurological department called himself an expert and writes all sorts of crap - the Internet will allow and tolerate everything. Do you really think that the adversaries on whom the decision depends are so brainless that they will heed the ravings of such experts and, according to their data, will unleash the third world? We have our own cool expert Vitaly (Mikhan). He, too, can dash off an article about how we will break the mouths of all mattresses. Do you think that if Shoigu reads his work, then he immediately rushes to wet NATO?
      1. +1
        April 26 2018 17: 21
        Quote: Piramidon
        Some kind of snotty schoolboy or patient in the neurological department called himself an expert

        Below the Thinker gave a link to the article. Read the whole story, very interesting.
        Quote: thinker
        Dan Plesch
        Director, Center for International Studies and Diplomacy, SOAS, University of London
        https://theconversation.com/could-the-us-win-worl
        d-war-iii-without-using-nuclear-weapons-94771
  7. 0
    April 26 2018 16: 16
    Another bunch of the analyst’s grief) I would like to see virtually the war of the USA and Russia without nuclear weapons. Very interesting.
    But perhaps he is right at the expense of the fleet, rather weak. Even taking into account our cruise missiles, with which we will sink their ships.
    1. +3
      April 26 2018 16: 23
      Quote: bazzbazz
      I would like to see virtually the war of the USA and Russia without nuclear weapons. Very interesting.

      I really want to see !!?
      For starters, give up food for a week
      spring is not in vain fasting in all religions!
      .... if he doesn’t let go, he will hit his head against the wall if he doesn’t let go then !!!?
      already to crash!
      1. 0
        April 26 2018 21: 47
        I wrote the same, virtually. Not resisting the comment?)
        1. +1
          April 28 2018 05: 29
          Quote: bazzbazz
          I wrote the same, virtually. Not resisting the comment?)

          Yes, the word hooked virtually laughing association with a computer game and the next thought is to use the second, third attempt ....
          I’ll tell you how much this kind of “virtuality” can affect reality:
          A group of young guys were sitting on the roof of a 9-story building ...
          I don’t know what they were doing there, what they were talking about (they were avid computer players), but in the end one (the son of my friend) jumped from the roof with a cry that he could fly !!!
          So sht ... more careful with ,, virtuality ,, winked
    2. +2
      April 26 2018 16: 36
      the US has no normal ground forces, how are they going to win a fleet interesting?
      Tomahawks quickly run out, their effectiveness is a big question ... And then what?
      1. +1
        April 26 2018 17: 25
        this is why mattresses force the EU to accept millions of migrants, MILLIONS (it’s even more difficult to imagine what millions of people think, because more than 100 thousand people rarely gather at the largest stadiums). and mostly men. and the Muslimization of the EU is being created for them (even Christmas trees are forbidden, because they insult Muslims, but Christians should not be offended by the massacre of rams at bayrams right on their streets, in front of their children).
        since now they threw the Arabs to destroy Syria, then these millions and their children will go infantry to our cities. and the white Europeans, who will never be at war with the Russians, will stay at home, make tanks, guns, and cartridges for those millions.
        1. +1
          April 26 2018 18: 02
          I think the emigrants did not come to Europe to die, so .......
          1. 0
            April 27 2018 09: 46
            these are not, but their descendants will go, and with joy.
            1. 0
              April 27 2018 13: 54
              Quote: just EXPL
              these are not, but their descendants will go, and with joy.

              descendants, judging by the vidos there are mostly male refugees and I doubt that Europeans will actively breed with them, though the most successful ones will bring up their families, it's like we have many Tajiks, but they just earn here
        2. +5
          April 26 2018 20: 32
          these millions and their children will go infantry to our cities

          Why should they go from a warm and well-fed Europe where one can live freely and not work, and when they want to rape local women with impunity, into a terrible snowy Russia under Russian bullets?
  8. 0
    April 26 2018 16: 21
    I read something like this before the Syrian crisis with our experts. So there is salt in it.
  9. +3
    April 26 2018 16: 22
    Yes Majumdar is just adequate compared to Entim
  10. 0
    April 26 2018 16: 23
    Well, well ... Freshly tradition .......
  11. +1
    April 26 2018 16: 26
    An intelligent person will not be called FlashYou. hi
  12. +2
    April 26 2018 16: 27
    Quote: Less
    He would write fiction.

    The coolest thing, if you read the Western forums, they sincerely believe in it, that we are fighting with rusty weapons ... laughing
    1. +2
      April 26 2018 16: 52
      Yeah, with such automatic weapons
  13. 0
    April 26 2018 16: 32
    White starts and wins sad
  14. +1
    April 26 2018 16: 33
    We saw in Russia such confident .. (in one place) in our history. In vain, gentlemen rejoice! soldier
    1. +3
      April 26 2018 16: 50
      It’s they who so calm themselves when they talk in the yard, but they beat the goat, they also have their own scumbags smile
  15. +3
    April 26 2018 16: 36
    Speaking about the number of missiles in the United States, the expert forgot to talk about Iron Man, Captain America, the Hulk and, of course, Superman, who would first destroy all of Russia's nuclear weapons so that the States would begin and triumphantly end the "nuclear-free third world war." Apparently, such a strategy is the big secret of the American government. Although, I agree, by and large on the actions of even one Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle, I’ll keep silent about all four, we have nothing to answer.
  16. 0
    April 26 2018 16: 37
    Personally, my opinion is, I’m not a mega cool expert, of course, but if you imagine all this ... Our ships do not even need to go out especially, what’s suitable for the sea border can be drowned by bastions and finished off by the fleet, but on the ground here, I'm sorry, the only one who poses a threat to us is France, Germany, Great Britain, and judging by the Second World War, France will get around ... Germans also know what it all smells like ... And the United States contingent in Europe is like a bear berry ...
  17. +1
    April 26 2018 16: 38
    Bullshit, why did he get that we will fight in the Mediterranean Sea, all naval forces will be pulled to the borders of the country, to the inland seas under the cover of aviation and coastal defense and let them try the sunflower there, get it in full, they won’t take their feet. And about 5 missiles, nonsense, 000% will be shot down, the rest will be a zilch for such a large country, then they will start raking carriers in full tactical nuclear weapons
  18. +1
    April 26 2018 16: 38
    This expert does not imagine what a volley of the Borey-A nuclear submarine is from under the ice in the North Pole is not possible to track, I am sure there will be nowhere to return.
  19. +3
    April 26 2018 16: 39
    I read this opus in the original, I got the impression that the article is custom-made, there is no analysis at all, only winning reports. Do not pay attention - spring exacerbation of schizophrenia happened at the "expert". Argue with such useless-sprinkle saliva!
    1. +1
      April 26 2018 16: 45
      In short - notes of a madman.
      Dan Plesch
      Director of the Center for International Studies and Diplomacy, SOAS, University of London
      https://theconversation.com/could-the-us-win-worl
      d-war-iii-without-using-nuclear-weapons-94771
      1. +1
        April 26 2018 16: 59
        Quote: thinker
        Director, Center for International Studies and Diplomacy, SOAS, University of London

        Is this type a diplomat? belay Wow ... I read the whole article. She is more serious than it seems.
  20. 0
    April 26 2018 16: 41
    This is not for Kim Jong In to curry favor!
  21. +7
    April 26 2018 16: 42
    [i] Mustafa Saddam Hussein from Iraq. 14-year-old Saddam Hussein’s grandson was the last to resist the American special forces during the assault on the mansion of Sheikh Navvaf Zeydan. At that moment, he remained the only living person in the house, and next to him lay the corpses of his father Kusai, Uncle Uday and their guard Abdel Samad.

    According to the testimony of the American soldiers involved in the operation, when they broke into the house, Mustafa Hussein opened fire on them from an automatic machine.

    400 US troops blocked him. After his uncle and father were killed before his eyes, the boy shot back and killed 14 American infantry from a sniper rifle. [b] The battle with the grandson of Saddam Hussein lasted about six hours.
    FOURTEEN YEARS OLD!!!!!

    Just imagine what ONE trained Russian warrior will do.
    1. +1
      April 26 2018 17: 49
      I don’t like mattresses, but everyone likes to tell tales after the war.
  22. +2
    April 26 2018 16: 43
    I’ll say this, after the last missile attack on Syria, I calmed down completely, before we were very afraid of their missile defense, and I served when these missiles were just starting to stand on combat duty and especially with nuclear warheads, and considered them to be powerful weapons, but their very use reduces them their effectiveness is insignificant .... firstly, it turns out to intercept, and secondly, the philosophy of precise amer attacks itself, in my opinion, reduces this effect to 0, they even feel sorry for the bird next to it ....
  23. 0
    April 26 2018 16: 50
    classic ... as long as there are such fools in the west, the probability of a nuclear war remains!
  24. +1
    April 26 2018 16: 51
    We also have a lot of such experts.
  25. +2
    April 26 2018 16: 53
    Well, that is, this alternatively gifted double did not have enough brains to realize that in the case of the 3rd world, the option "without the use of nuclear weapons" is simply not considered. Well, well done, the material can only be spread under the herring, and even then I'm afraid the taste will ruin it.
  26. +4
    April 26 2018 16: 55
    The secret of peace lies in the simplest of ideas - * Do not take sick people to the head of people! *
  27. +1
    April 26 2018 16: 56
    The main thing is to agree with the Russians that they wait until the invincible and legendary American army prepares to strike. In short, you can famously crack bricks with your hands, but ... they (bricks) do not give change and timidly wait for the process to begin.
  28. +1
    April 26 2018 16: 58
    They all set off with their minds, there will be no winners, and the bunkers will not save. They are people of some kind of 8th kind, or they are no longer people ...
  29. +1
    April 26 2018 17: 02
    Quote: Rostovchanin
    I wish he slept what he smokes! Or drinking some kind of infection!

    -----------------------------------
    Sands 2.0. Bears the common snowstorm. laughing laughing
  30. +1
    April 26 2018 17: 02
    Also, a couple of Ecstasy tablets, and PPC. Galaxy)))
  31. 0
    April 26 2018 17: 10
    I wonder how many "Daggers" will be required to destroy the US group in the Mediterranean?
    1. +2
      April 26 2018 18: 04
      Quote: Compasure
      I wonder how many "Daggers" will be required to destroy the US group in the Mediterranean?

      A couple of pieces will be enough so that they no longer go there. The first is at the bottom, the rest into a quiet harbor. They will begin to take to the bottom all that with the American flag ...
  32. +2
    April 26 2018 17: 14
    "one left" ... "one right" ... expert - onanist?
  33. 0
    April 26 2018 17: 18
    He is in what clinic then ??
  34. +2
    April 26 2018 17: 23
    - writes Plesh

    In general, bald patches with a soft sign should be written. As well as Macron dandruff, for example.
  35. +1
    April 26 2018 17: 59
    and why they don’t shoot at their aircraft carriers, but we’ll kill the planes, well, after hitting the first tomahawks, I think ours will answer and it’s not clear where the Americans are returning
  36. +5
    April 26 2018 18: 02
    Even the harsh Russians suggest that there will be no winners in World War III ... No. As for the US military, by destroying civilians in different regions of the earth, they thereby gave the Russian military carte blanche for the total extermination of people in American military uniforms with weapons in their hands outside the borders of the American state. This should be a panacea for their craving to appear where their presence is not required. This is the only way to stop this desire to "fight" ... The more there are coffins, the fewer there will be ... Yes
  37. +1
    April 26 2018 18: 19
    Another Eksperd focused only on the number of missiles and aircraft carriers.
    And the fact that they can be knocked down or drowned and then given in response is not for the Exerted minds, apparently ...
  38. +2
    April 26 2018 18: 30
    Yankees you are already tired of everything, go ... and rest in peace ...
  39. +1
    April 26 2018 18: 59
    Hmm ... the country is not scared.
  40. +2
    April 26 2018 18: 59
    This character with Hollywood needs to be tied.
  41. 0
    April 26 2018 19: 06
    The haters on both sides can themselves believe in the nonsense they carry and convince others. So it was before the First World War. Dangerously.
  42. +2
    April 26 2018 19: 10
    having "colossal capabilities" the United States will be able to defeat Russia in a possible Third World War without the use of nuclear weapons.

    As the Supreme said: "Why do we need a world where Russia will not be."
    Consequently, if Russia does not have the strength to defend its independence without the use of nuclear weapons, then it will be used. And therefore - "the whole world is in ruin."
    Where will this "expert then survive, in which cellars and catacombs skerry? request
    But the living will envy the dead. Yes
  43. +3
    April 26 2018 19: 17
    Bald right. Khan to all. The states will win, especially aliens. I also watched these little things ...
  44. 0
    April 26 2018 19: 28
    and why is this nonsense published here ???
  45. 0
    April 26 2018 19: 28
    this is nonsense! and if one Russian rocket still breaks through ?! The author either sat out with 3D games or mushrooms got drunk. I thought after Obama all the crazy ones were removed from the "radar" ..
    But what about inviting a cup of coffee and “rubbing all misunderstandings” to avoid destroying ourselves?
    .. guys, we need to arrange another place in ward number 6! And then we’ll try it ... EPT .. go there to the left
  46. +1
    April 26 2018 19: 36
    "One left!"

    Let entot xsperd first try to satisfy himself with one left.
    I will be a reptile - there will be more sense.
    Counting by counting, but in real life? A real shooter never goes as planned (except for the drunkenness at the wake).
  47. BAI
    0
    April 26 2018 19: 54
    If news commentators would go into thematic sections (opinion and analytics), they would see that this topic has already been expertly discussed and there is nothing to shake the air for nothing.
  48. +1
    April 26 2018 19: 55
    Voooot. We received confirmation of the "game theory" if the article itself is not another fake in the matter of staging smoke screens "look at what we are stupid people." If nevertheless TI, then directly two spoons in one cup. The first dirty, they can decide, maybe such. They can even as a provocation just to earn points. In Syria, in Rostov, if the situation develops in the Donbass from the municipality "well, what the hell!" The second clean one is where the macumba comes to them and comes with their dislike of socialist realism and geography. For example, I begin to giggle at the statement about cyber attacks on the radar. Do they have a network connection? Otherwise, where does such a thought come to mind? Or here is the "invisible delivery" to the turn of the strike on the BR of their rackets with 960 km. (I unfold the map with the areas of the Strategic Missile Forces armies and no longer giggle, but laugh at the voice, applying rulers to bases or possible lines of attack from the sea). Well, you probably have to rely on TI, otherwise somehow the concept of behavior is somehow lost and the game theory goes into the theory of schizophrenia.
  49. +2
    April 26 2018 20: 21
    Somewhere a long time ago they wrote that the first strike (in which case ...) from NATO will consist of approximately 1500-2000 missiles such as axes and others like them. If the first strike is reflected by Russia with acceptable losses, then NATO will not dare to strike. From this promise, the development of a missile defense system was built. I read an article more than 10 years ago. It is interesting to me, a civilian (but who nevertheless made his contribution, very modest, but, nevertheless, a purely personal contribution to the development of the country's air defense ...):
    1. Is this really so?
    2. If so, will Russia be able to repel such a blow?
    Who is in the know - please answer.
    Thanks in advance! hi
  50. 0
    April 26 2018 21: 06
    The US will be able to defeat Russia in a possible Third World War without the use of nuclear weapons.
    Unless if Russia will not use nuclear weapons. Only now we have long abandoned this idiotic concept! laughing
    "Able to eliminate Russia's deterrent nuclear factor by a powerful strike from conventional weapons with the support of missile defense"
    especially underwater drones laughing
    can be hit by several types of missiles, which are almost imperceptibly delivered on American planes
    Invisible planes? The Serbs had a weak air defense, but Stealth was able to bring down.
  51. +1
    April 26 2018 22: 06
    While Russia and China allegedly do not have anything similar in quantity or quality, “that could truly threaten the US mainland,” the publication notes

    The expert is not at all friendly with geography.

    The worst thing about these articles is that after reading, some stubborn Atlanticist will decide to try it in practice.
  52. The comment was deleted.
  53. +2
    April 27 2018 00: 14
    I would feel sorry for my baldness, expert Plesh!
  54. The comment was deleted.
  55. The comment was deleted.
  56. 0
    April 27 2018 08: 04
    Well, there are two options... one is fantastic... the other is real... Fantastic... let them win... Real... superman will fly in and settle everything...
  57. 0
    April 27 2018 08: 57
    Madhouse, sir....
  58. The comment was deleted.
  59. 0
    April 27 2018 09: 38
    the uryapedriots alone knocked out the local uryapedriots, you are not alone in this universe, there are enough such idiots there. wassat
  60. 0
    April 27 2018 14: 45
    The NSA or whoever explains it to them should have explanatory conversations with such idiots in the interests of the United States itself.
    Such a scenario was never possible; the Americans in any case receive unacceptable damage, especially since such a thing is impossible now. When he retires, he can write whatever he wants about his frostbitten self and his “brilliant” ideas. But now, when he is an official and speaks such nonsense, it does not benefit anyone.
  61. 0
    April 27 2018 15: 39
    Another freak-out of a psycho-analyst? What was that all about......
  62. 0
    April 27 2018 17: 48
    American expert is bluffing is mistaken is truthful
    A...E.B.Z..P, where the choice is "B", as the center of the structure and as the edge of the three BZP
    12.7..7.12.7, where the choice is “7” as the center of the structure and as the center of identical elements - 777
    What is clear is that he is bluffing.
  63. 0
    April 27 2018 18: 09
    All they have to do is drive a few hundred ships into the Novorossiysk bay, under the walls of the Peter and Paul Fortress - such volleys, 4 thousand missiles are a trillion dollars, in order to give the Crimea to the Ukrainians again. No one is bringing down the world - where are the direct losses - the entire world economy, in order to “teach Putin or Shmutin a lesson and who will be the winner - if the Russian Federation is not included in this world economy - when it collapses? The dollar will simply cease to be a world currency - it’s one thing when Europe is destroyed, the USA has all the money in the world, but when the USA is involved in a war, no one will take money there - because no one knows how it will all end, and in two years you can forget about the economy - it’s not just bombing Iraq and driving jeeps there, which already resulted in bankruptcy - the American troops ate a trillion in ten years, only direct losses - they will be tortured to suck oil there in order to cover that other loss. It is necessary to pump a thousand billion barrels - world production - if Iraq sucks even a million barrels a year and the Americans steal it - they will need a thousand years to recoup only the direct losses from the war, or rather some kind of genocide of Iraqi and surrounding residents. But they continue to pay and indirectly have already pumped another trillion into these stupid war games and support for regimes that, no matter how you feed them, will never be loyal to the United States. And again the question of “free money” - they print, but they know that they will have to pay. Why are they going to raise their libido and bomb nuclear countries? Even Trump is not capable of such a psycho - this is completely necessary, a complete craziness at the head of the United States, with a ward for the mentally ill in the White House, his apparatus. And in the end who will win? The American economy has become so fat that they will not survive the war, and the Russian Federation lives on misirs - the Kolyma proverb “it is not a small ration that kills, but a large one” will work here.