All the same, "Dongfeng 26." China Confirms Adoption of New BRDS

21
China has confirmed the adoption of a new ballistic missile. Chinese spokesman Wu Qian said at a press briefing on Thursday that the Dongfeng-26 (DF-26) strategic ballistic missile (DF-XNUMX) has entered into service with the PLA.

All the same, "Dongfeng 26." China Confirms Adoption of New BRDS




The PLA Missile Forces adopted the Dongfeng 26 rocket, which is a fully developed China medium-range ballistic missile, it has passed all the necessary tests and tests for readiness for battle. After installing the rocket officially entered the military armament of the Chinese army
- declared Wu Qian.

He also stressed that "China’s nuclear strategy is purely defensive in nature, while the policy of the PRC does not under any circumstances weapon - has not changed. "

The DF-26 ballistic missile is capable of carrying conventional and nuclear warheads and can be used on demand. Missiles can accurately hit targets on land and at sea.
  • http://bloodredpatriots.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 26 2018 13: 47
    Well, what, China is not burdened with any INF Treaty. And the main opponent behind the "garden" is India.
    1. +8
      April 26 2018 13: 50
      It’s logical, and the “elite” of them, again, has little personal financial dependence on the “partners”, not like ours.
      1. +1
        April 26 2018 14: 21
        Quote: BZTM
        It’s logical, and the “elite” of them, again, has little personal financial dependence on the “partners”, not like ours.


        The "elite" that depends on someone is agents of influence and not the elite. All these addicts I will soon be hysterically taking out grandmothers from offshore and taking them home back here and their dependence will end.
      2. +1
        April 27 2018 12: 41
        "Elite" is a supranational governance structure. China has no elite at all.
    2. +6
      April 26 2018 14: 06
      "And the main opponent behind the" garden "is India." ////

      And also:
      American bases near China, Taiwan, Japan, the Russian Far East, Korea, Vietnam.
      1. +2
        April 26 2018 14: 15
        This is just what they can reach. But China will not territorially drag out a war with Russia and the USA! The area of ​​residence of their one and a half billion people is too small ... And the remaining goals are only secondary, in the case of a major war. (Why did they need Vietnam?) So - you just distort!
        1. +2
          April 26 2018 14: 25
          Vietnam is one of the constant historical opponents
          China. They have a territorial dispute over islands in the South China Sea. Everyone has forgotten the relatively recent 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War. Then China was weak, and Vietnam won.
          Vietnam is so afraid of revenge that it made friends with the United States and buys short-range ballistic missiles in Israel.
          1. +2
            April 26 2018 14: 39
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Vietnam is one of the constant historical opponents
            China.

            According to your logic, we should cut out all of Europe, as well as a significant part of Asia ... And also cut out a part of the Russian population.
            Of course, the old cannot be forgotten, but living in the past is a mistake!
            But, China, if desired, Vietnam can tactfully squeeze out of the disputed territories ...
          2. +1
            April 26 2018 21: 13
            Vietnam won because it was the USSR. In Transbaikalia, the tank division reached the border of the CPF to the border posts near the border with China and the tanks fired an empty salvo towards the Chinese ... and that’s all ... the SRV defeated the PRC
      2. 0
        April 26 2018 14: 31
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Russian Far East, Korea, Vietnam.

        What for? Manchuria has an already sparsely populated land. Korea and Vietnam, this is a constant zone of interests of China, since ancient times. India, Taiwan and Japan are constantly tense. Especially the border conflicts between India, Pakistan and China in the Himalayas: “The main problem of the territorial delimitation between the two countries is that the line of the Indian-Chinese border runs along the line of the highest mountain ranges of the Earth - the Himalayas and Karakorum. The border is demarcated in this highly crossed alpine the region is technically extremely complicated .. "http://www.abirus.ru/content/564/623/626/11567/11
        568.html
      3. +1
        April 26 2018 16: 24
        The United States did not care about something ..., and Israel is not very worried, here is Korea with their 20kt. damn the problem? here is Iran with the program, yeah ... What to put in reference to the strong? There isn’t even a damn, but what about the nuclear threat to the world? ... You’re peaceful people, don’t annoy you, don’t spoil your mood ... with a pro-American burp ... I just ate it, I don’t feel like taking 100 grams before dinner ...
        1. +3
          April 26 2018 20: 17
          "I kind of ate, I don’t want to puke with legal 100 grams before dinner .." ////

          God forbid, I also took 40 g of whiskey now. To your health! For world peace! drinks
          1. +2
            April 26 2018 20: 20
            Quote: voyaka uh
            For world peace!

            drinks hi
    3. 0
      April 26 2018 14: 23
      Quote: Logall
      Well, what, China is not burdened with any INF Treaty. And the main opponent behind the "garden" is India.


      It is understood that from 1000 to 5500 will fly in the direction of aircraft carrier formations of America. It can fly to India which is easier. Tactical aviation can generally carry them there, if of course they can.
  2. +2
    April 26 2018 13: 48
    They are not afraid of us ..! Now the howl will start hehe
    1. +8
      April 26 2018 13: 52
      Quote: MIKHAN
      They are not afraid of us.

      Of course not! After all, "Russian is a Chinese brother forever!" laughing
      1. +5
        April 26 2018 14: 00
        about the "brothers forever" I doubt very much, but not enemies for sure, rather forced partners
  3. +3
    April 26 2018 14: 11
    It’s always easier to negotiate with a roommate than with a punks from a neighboring area. If he’s not a drunk, a drug addict or an outright rowdy. For the PRC, this is not noticeable. Yes, they’re cunning, they’re tearing newspapers on the mailboxes ... But with a lance, under the edge, I’m not climbing :)
    1. +3
      April 26 2018 14: 30
      But wars most often occur with neighbors,
      with which common borders. sad
      1. 0
        April 26 2018 14: 41
        With a neighbor whom these brothers bribed, poisoned and started ... They would live in their own area, and would not climb. Type: you eat him, we’ll squeeze a hut from him, and then we’ll put you a half liter.
  4. 0
    April 26 2018 14: 51
    Let us understand in your hemisphere of the Earth ... And in yours - understand yourself. That the opponents are all weak there?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"