Military Review

Tehran will be "cut off" all military programs. Paris will develop a new agreement on Iran

73
French President Emmanuel Macron, who visited the White House and met with Donald Trump, said that in Paris they were ready to begin work on a “new agreement” on the Iranian nuclear program. Such a statement Macron made during a joint press conference with Trump.


According to Macron, the following new priority points should be designated in the agreement: the termination of any “nuclear activity” in Iran by 2025; make sure that Iran has no places where nuclear research activities could be carried out; the cessation of missile development by Iran; the creation of a political platform that will contain Iran’s activities in the Middle East, including Iraq and Syria.

According to Macron, he expects that the “new agreement” will be supported by other countries, including Russia and Turkey.

At the same time, the French president did not answer the question that he was not particularly satisfied with the existing agreement with Tehran.

Psychological Detail: Macron internally does not accept what Trump says to him:
Tehran will be "cut off" all military programs. Paris will develop a new agreement on Iran


Recall that a few days ago, the Iranian Foreign Ministry noted the following: if the US withdraws from the previously reached agreement, Tehran will have to proceed with the resumption of nuclear development.

Israel’s Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who said yesterday that Israel “does not interfere in the internal affairs of Syria, is visiting Washington today in Washington. The ministry’s press service notes that in the US, Lieberman plans to discuss regional security issues, including “spreading Iran’s influence in Syria.”
Photos used:
https://www.facebook.com/EmmanuelMacron
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The black
    The black April 25 2018 06: 48
    +12
    Tehran will be "cut off" all military programs.
    Yeah ... and they will do the same to Iraq, Libya and Syria ... In the place of the leadership of the Russian Federation, I would, on the contrary, help Iran in creating modern air defense and not only ....
    1. Don
      Don April 25 2018 07: 02
      +13
      Quote: Black
      In place of the leadership of the Russian Federation, on the contrary, I would help Iran in creating modern air defense and not only ....

      Iran ordered hundreds of new civilian aircraft in Europe for money. Do we have to take care of the security of the Iranian Ayatollah regime at our own expense? Why on earth? Let them fork out for their safety, otherwise tomorrow they will lie in blood, torn to pieces, like the leader of the Libyan jamahiriya.
      1. newcomer
        newcomer April 25 2018 07: 05
        +1
        we cannot sell them the CC100, the Yankees do not give the go-ahead, there are a lot of Yankee technologies. and an order in the west of aircraft machines_ is like an economic safety net of the poison program agreement. not the fact that the order will be confirmed.
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 April 25 2018 08: 12
          +3
          It is not only confirmed - it is being fulfilled. The first sides are already flying in Iran.
          1. newcomer
            newcomer April 25 2018 08: 16
            +2
            Thanks for the correction, I missed the news. but this proves once again that the West imposed sanctions on Iran exclusively for us.
            1. alex-s
              alex-s April 25 2018 08: 45
              +11
              The right guy Emmanuel will not be called!
              1. Incvizitor
                Incvizitor April 25 2018 13: 40
                +1
                peasant Emmanuel will not be called
        2. lance
          lance April 25 2018 21: 37
          0
          no need to say stupidity, we can sell everything, but having warned the usa. time. using all our can far send.
      2. The black
        The black April 25 2018 07: 10
        +3
        Quote: Donskoy
        Do we have to take care of the security of the Iranian Ayatollah regime at our own expense? Why on earth?

        Did I write "at my own expense?" wink
        Let them fork out for their safety
        Let them fork out.
      3. Vadivak
        Vadivak April 25 2018 08: 25
        +2
        Quote: Donskoy
        Do we have to take care of the security of the Iranian Ayatollah regime at our own expense?

        Khomeini regarded the USSR as the “Lesser Satan,” and the United States as the “Great Satan.”
      4. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg April 25 2018 10: 49
        0
        Quote: Donskoy
        Quote: Black
        In place of the leadership of the Russian Federation, on the contrary, I would help Iran in creating modern air defense and not only ....

        Iran ordered hundreds of new civilian aircraft in Europe for money. Do we have to take care of the security of the Iranian Ayatollah regime at our own expense? Why on earth? Let them fork out for their safety, otherwise tomorrow they will lie in blood, torn to pieces, like the leader of the Libyan jamahiriya.


        Nessa they shell out. Weapons in the Russian Federation are bought for real money. Nuclear fuel is the same. The second block of nuclear power plants will be built for them. ... and much more ...
        1. Don
          Don April 25 2018 17: 55
          0
          what kind of weapon is bought for real money?
    2. Chertt
      Chertt April 25 2018 07: 06
      +3
      the cessation of any “nuclear activity” in Iran by 2025; make sure that Iran does not have any places where nuclear research activities could be carried out; the cessation of missile development by Iran; creating a political platform that will hold back Iran’s activities in the Middle East, including Iraq and Syria

      Trump and Macron went crazy. This is not even surrender. This is a self-shot suggestion.
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack April 25 2018 07: 12
        +3
        Quote: Chertt
        Trump and Macron went crazy. This is not even surrender. This is a self-shot suggestion.

        And let's "from the contrary": let's say the Persians were "allowed" all-all-all... here - from earth to heaven.
        Will it be good? For us, for example?
        IMHO Persians need ... push. And better - with the wrong hands so as not to get dirty. While controlling the process of "pressure", if possible - with minimal cost.
        Which, as I understand it, is being done now yes
        1. Solomon Kane
          Solomon Kane April 25 2018 07: 32
          +1
          For this, there are systems of checks and balances in politics .....
          And along the way, Russia succeeds in this technique ......
        2. Chertt
          Chertt April 25 2018 07: 32
          +2
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          Persians need ... push. And better - with the wrong hands, so as not to get dirty. While controlling the process of "pressure"

          It is necessary to press, there is no doubt. But to do this through appropriate international structures, on the basis of the "Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons", and similar documents. If the US starts to push, are you sure they will stop wink
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack April 25 2018 07: 40
            +1
            Quote: Chertt
            If the US starts to push, are you sure they will stop

            By themselves, no. But slowing down a process is always less costly than moving it, um. That's what he said:
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            must ... push. And better - with the wrong hands, so as not to get dirty. While controlling the process of "pressure", if possible - with minimal cost.

            I stand on that and I will stand laughing
            1. Chertt
              Chertt April 25 2018 08: 00
              0
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              must ... push. And better - with the wrong hands, so as not to get dirty. While controlling the process of "pressure", if possible - with minimal cost.
              I stand on that and I will stand

              So who would argue? this is ninety percent opinion. It’s not particularly difficult to stand here.
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              But slowing down a process is always less costly than moving it, um.

              Oh ambiguous this thesis laughing
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack April 25 2018 10: 09
                0
                Quote: Chertt
                Quote: Golovan Jack
                ... slowing down a process is always less costly than moving it, um.

                Oh ambiguous this thesis laughing

                It’s quite unambiguous. Do not forget that the Persians themselves are involved in this process. As a brake, or even slow gas, GYY laughing
                In general, the principle of Le Chatelier has not yet been canceled. "Every system is lazy," the force of rest friction is greater than its sliding ... well, and hereinafter yes
                PS: "always" there, of course, is superfluous ... at I got carried away. Replace with "as a rule" - and the thesis becomes simply desirable (sic).
        3. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky April 25 2018 10: 26
          +2
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          IMHO Persians need ... push. And better - with the wrong hands so as not to get dirty. While controlling the process of "pressure", if possible - with minimal cost.
          Which, as I understand it, is being done now
          You understand Golovan correctly. But they are doing it not only now. Persians crushed, crushed and, apparently, will continue to crush, an obstacle to which is the failure in Syria. If in 2015, the coalition managed to assassinate Assad, today “democracy” would have already crushed Iranian cities. As a matter of fact, Iran then made concessions in terms of stopping nuclear development, for which it received a sanction pardon, but the United States is essentially unilaterally trying to break the agreement. So the problem is not in the nuclear program, but in the fact that the United States and Co. are stupidly looking for an excuse to put pressure on Iran, with the goal of weakening it and changing power to pro-American loyalists in the long run.
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          And let's "from the contrary": let's say the Persians were "allowed" all-all-all ... here - from earth to heaven. Will it be good? For us, for example?
          I think that is not bad. We are also not interested in the fact that the main bump in the B. East will be held exclusively by Israel. It is not very beneficial for us that with the fall of Iran, the positions of Turkey and Saudi Arabia will strengthen. It is clear that it is naive to expect that nuclear Iran will be controlled by Russia, but given the fact that being surrounded by "sworn friends", he himself will be interested in cooperating with Russia.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack April 25 2018 17: 06
            0
            Ek, everything is difficult for you ... you see la:
            - I’m personally on the drum interests of the Persians (like everyone else there, however). The fact that the States (and Israel) of them, the Persians, are now crushing, for me, is so good rather than bad.
            - I’m not at all interested in anyone winning this, ahem, involuntary struggle. Let them continue to fight, at least something useful (from my point of view) will be occupied.
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            I think not bad

            But I think it’s rather bad. Because Iran is a "thing in itself" (no worse than Kim), and what they think up there - Allah alone knows. And he, as you know, akbar ...
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            We are also not interested in the fact that the main bump in the B. East will be held exclusively by Israel

            Israel is negotiable. Iran is not a fact.
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            It’s not very beneficial for us that with the fall of Iran, the positions of Turkey and Saudi Arabia will strengthen

            I repeat - I personally am for the "eternal high" continuation of the "struggle" for an unlimited time. It is clear that this is unattainable, but we must strive for this.
            Everything is strictly IMHO yes
    3. Aleks713
      Aleks713 April 25 2018 07: 07
      +1
      By the way, if Turkey nevertheless succumbs to pressure from the United States and NATO and does not acquire the S-400, then why not sell them to Iran? Iran, I think, will not refuse. And since air defense systems are a defensive weapon, there are NO legal restrictions on the sale of S-400 to Iran. This will be another hello to our Western "partners" and Israel.
      1. Aleks713
        Aleks713 April 25 2018 07: 11
        +4
        And if the United States and its partners, ignoring the opinion of not only Iran, but also Russia and China, try to change the terms of the nuclear deal or even get out of it, then it is logical for Russia to withdraw from restrictions on the sale of other weapons systems to Iran. For example, Su-30 and Su-35 aircraft ... Therefore, we must now begin to prepare Iranian pilots for these aircraft in Russia.
        1. lance
          lance April 25 2018 21: 39
          0
          restrictions on the sale of aircraft su .... does not exist. partner's desire and rf
    4. RASKAT
      RASKAT April 25 2018 07: 18
      +1
      Macron, Iran doesn’t have any nuclear program. Well, only if it’s medical, and even then it was not about the reactor, but about the cyclotron.
      Such idiocy is happening with Iran, another confirmation that you do not have nuclear weapons, forget about the national interests and indeed no one in the world will reckon with you and do not care about your opinion.
    5. askort154
      askort154 April 25 2018 07: 21
      0
      ....Paris will develop a new agreement on Iran ...


      Trump handed Mocron a piece of paper with the text of the agreement. Let the initiative come from Europe, not from the USA and Israel.
      1. Slovak
        Slovak April 25 2018 13: 28
        +1
        Quote: askort154
        ....Paris will develop a new agreement on Iran ...


        Trump handed Mocron a piece of paper with the text of the agreement. Let the initiative come from Europe, not from the USA and Israel.

        Veiled Macrosha suggested ... In plain text, this is a requirement to disarm and lie under the United States
    6. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov April 25 2018 07: 49
      +2
      Something and truly photos of the historic meeting of Trump-Macron resemble photos of the newlyweds! In the video, Trump from Macron dandruff blows away to be “perfect”! How would a wife not be jealous of a sweet couple! Milana and that old woman go so upset!
    7. siberalt
      siberalt April 25 2018 08: 14
      0
      Forcing Tehran to ask Russia to come to them with our military bases? lol
    8. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg April 25 2018 10: 46
      0
      Quote: Black
      Tehran will be "cut off" all military programs.
      Yeah ... and they will do the same to Iraq, Libya and Syria ... In the place of the leadership of the Russian Federation, I would, on the contrary, help Iran in creating modern air defense and not only ....


      It must be understood that Iran is not Iraq, Libya and Syria. In Iran, the state is a totalitarian type with a single control center. There you can’t hold protests under the camera. Any attempt by cannibals to start a booze in Iran will end with the disappearance of cannibals, which happened recently. And military intervention is all the more impossible because there is a nuclear bomb that will arrive in Israel or in the KSA ...
  2. igorka357
    igorka357 April 25 2018 06: 49
    +3
    Macron is so vile to be honest .. lol In the photo he is like a mongrel looking into the owner’s mouth .. and by the way, why how .. laughing
    1. The black
      The black April 25 2018 06: 51
      +4
      Quote: igorka357
      Macron is so ugly to be honest.

      it’s just that the grandmother whom he married wassat, and so he is an obedient boy. What the elders say, he does. True, lately his dandruff has been tortured. Even grandfather Trump made a remark wassat
      1. novel66
        novel66 April 25 2018 07: 08
        +2
        Psychological detail: Macron does not internally accept what Trump tells him

        Well, yes, Trampushka’s wife is a sight to behold, Macrosh’s envy
      2. Chichikov
        Chichikov April 25 2018 07: 21
        +3
        Quote: Black
        True, lately his dandruff has been tortured. Even grandfather Trump made a remark
        There you will not understand - whose "dandruff"! At the solemn meeting, one was missing so that one of them, according to the biblical tradition, washed the feet of the other.
    2. Vanek
      Vanek April 25 2018 06: 51
      +2
      - Tell me, did the defendant have a personal dislike for the victim?

      - Yeah! Experienced! He told me himself: “I have such a personal dislike for the victim that I can’t eat ...”


      Mimino *
    3. askort154
      askort154 April 25 2018 07: 11
      +2
      Game 357 ....Makron is so vile to be honest .. lol In the photo he is like a mongrel looking into the mouth of the owner .. and by the way, why how ..

      And in the eyes of a mongrel - I will lick everything to you tongue to shine, just make me look at the EU instead of Merkel.
    4. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor April 25 2018 13: 41
      0
      His grandmother would leave with a belt so that he wouldn’t climb into adult affairs, a dwarf poodle.
  3. Tusv
    Tusv April 25 2018 06: 54
    +1
    Well, okay. In a year, you can sell anything to Iran. Need a new agreement. Not with Iran. With Russia. Do we need this? It’s time to change the tank park, to build Six Varshavyanka. Golden bottom
    1. newcomer
      newcomer April 25 2018 06: 59
      +2
      something tells me that before the expiration of the “term” the West will find something to complain about. we need to cooperate more closely with Iran, there are not so many countries that sympathize with us, they will strangle them all individually, for dessert.
      1. novel66
        novel66 April 25 2018 07: 14
        +3
        hi hi it would be nice to ask Iran, an agreement to unilaterally change some vileness
        1. newcomer
          newcomer April 25 2018 07: 17
          +2
          with a peppy morning. I agree, but is it really these accusers accustomed to do vile things? they have such a psychology; they are Jupiters, the rest are bulls.
  4. Monarchist
    Monarchist April 25 2018 06: 58
    +1
    Quote: Black
    Tehran will be "cut off" all military programs.
    Yeah ... and they will do the same to Iraq, Libya and Syria ...

    This is a last resort, but for now they will try to scare and castle: put forward “adequate” leaders. They have long studied with a microscope the biographies of all B.M. significant leaders
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 25 2018 07: 03
    +3
    in Paris ready to start work on a “new agreement” on the Iranian nuclear program
    This political undershot (Macron) where? There was a plug in each barrel, just to declare itself and its "guiding" role in international activities. His statements and behavior has become very similar to Poroshenko, who is also ready to stumble on everything related to diplomacy, even if he himself was not close there.
  6. Vanek
    Vanek April 25 2018 07: 06
    +1
    Tehran will be circumcised

    Circumcision is a strange term for a given situation.
  7. Strips
    Strips April 25 2018 07: 10
    +1
    And rightly so.
    We must show Iran its place.
    And he will kick back to make North Korea out of it. angry
  8. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 25 2018 07: 23
    +2
    Iran urgently needs to “buy at least a dozen nuclear missile warheads in the eastern bazaar!” Only this will be a guarantee of the existence of the country on the planet!
  9. AlexVas44
    AlexVas44 April 25 2018 07: 25
    +2
    ... in Paris, ready to start work on a "new agreement" on Iran’s nuclear ...

    Well, they have survived, now Paris in the person of Macron is ready to dictate the conditions to a sovereign state. Ek his (Macron) bursting with confidence in his superiority (superiority?).
  10. HMR333
    HMR333 April 25 2018 07: 27
    0
    and ass them soap them too ?! there is only one suitable for those bite
  11. Moskovit
    Moskovit April 25 2018 07: 27
    +2
    France is trying to pose as a significant player in world politics. She lost her influence in the Arab world, actively supporting the color revolutions and chaos in the Middle East. The United States has turned the country into a refuge sump. Also, the young carduelis was imposed on the president, who has old women on her mind.
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit April 25 2018 08: 04
      0
      Quote: Moskovit
      France is trying to pose as a significant player in world politics

      The fact of the matter is that to be a player and portray a player are two completely different things. The once great France was blown away.
  12. Sibiriya
    Sibiriya April 25 2018 07: 41
    0
    According to Macron, the following new priority points should be designated in the agreement: the termination of any “nuclear activity” in Iran by 2025; make sure that Iran has no places where nuclear research activities could be carried out; the cessation of missile development by Iran; the creation of a political platform that will contain Iran’s activities in the Middle East, including Iraq and Syria.
    There is an attempt to revise earlier agreements, with the aim of depriving sovereignty and exposing oneself beloved by God.
  13. rocket757
    rocket757 April 25 2018 07: 44
    +3
    Napoleon was small, but GREAT! True Corsican, it’s like a Frenchman on the other side!
    Now look, so after De Gaulle, France with the leaders is very lucky, small, even smaller, and even very small! If you don’t go deeper about physical conditions, then for business it’s certainly noticeable .... European sweetie for striped ones!
    In short, Shaw Uncle Sam seems to be! .... fl about politics, the geyropeyskih "leaders"!
    For the Persians .... it's fellow travelers, on my mind, everything is very temporary and you need to keep an ear with such, not just sharp, but really be on the line!
    Russia has only two allies, it was, is and will be! And most importantly, this is her Great People!
  14. RedKors1953
    RedKors1953 April 25 2018 07: 45
    0
    There was Abama and Chirac, everything was like that with the program. Trump appeared with Macron and the program needs to be redone again. Well, it’s numb to anyone so drawn to war.
  15. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov April 25 2018 07: 48
    0
    Iran announces intention to prepare new Macron
  16. Dormidont
    Dormidont April 25 2018 07: 57
    0
    Russia will certainly support. But here's the bad luck: Abkhazia and South Ossetia will continue cooperation with Iran
  17. Orionvit
    Orionvit April 25 2018 08: 01
    0
    he expects other countries, including Russia and Turkey, to support the “new agreement”.
    From a dead donkey ears will receive, not Russian support for Iran.
  18. high
    high April 25 2018 08: 12
    0
    Quote: newbie
    something tells me that before the expiration of the “term” the West will find something to complain about. we need to cooperate more closely with Iran, there are not so many countries that sympathize with us, they will strangle them all individually, for dessert.

    Think about protecting the interests of Russia ....
    The problem of hydrocarbon production on the Caspian shelf remains the stumbling block of relations between Russia and Iran,
    Observers believe that, “Russia is preparing for war with Iran,” in the Caspian .... April 18, the media reported the end of the exercises.
    The training was attended by more than 1 thousand military personnel and more than 20 ships of the Caspian flotilla, including the crews of the missile ships Dagestan and Tatarstan ...
    Joint operations of ships during sea battles with surface ships of a conditional enemy with the implementation of a range of missile and artillery firing at sea, coastal and air targets were worked out.
    As you can easily see, we are talking about a very serious preparation for war with the “conditional” enemy.
    This is clearly not about the former Soviet republics - Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan, which, like Russia, have access to the Caspian Sea.
    There remains only one Caspian country, with which Moscow is demonstratively preparing to fight - this is Iran.
    The failure of the recent tripartite talks in Ankara (Putin-Rukhani-Erdogan) was marked by a statement by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu that the main base of the Caspian fleet was being transferred from Astrakhan to Dagestan Kaspiysk, closer to the theater of possible military operations.
    At a press conference in the Ministry of Defense, Shoigu emphasized that the personnel of the military contingent in the Caspian will be increased several times in the very near future.
    1. Kasym
      Kasym April 25 2018 09: 08
      +6
      The Russian Federation has great economic interests in Iran (including transit, gas, pipelines, etc.) and a NATO fleet in the Caspian is not needed. This is the defense of the interests of the Russian Federation.
      Russia does not have disagreements on oil in the Caspian - there is a different approach to the division of the Caspian, which, according to reports, can be resolved this year.
      The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are ongoing exercises, including in the Caspian. Or did you not know this? From there, in Syria, the Caliber was launched.
      The fleet is transferred to the Caspian Sea due to the inconvenient location of the base - one sunken ship at the exit from the base and the entire flotilla will be locked.
      The flotilla in the Caspian has seriously replenished - maybe this is the reason, well, does the new base need to build the necessary facilities and infrastructure ?! hi
      1. lance
        lance April 25 2018 21: 43
        +1
        Well, in general, plus, questions on the Caspian are resolved and approved by parliaments. Flag of Kazakhstan?
        1. Kasym
          Kasym April 25 2018 21: 59
          +1
          VO is blocked in KZ, it is necessary to block the address. Flags of countries through which there is a connection with the site are displayed. And of those flags that there is a choice, ours is not. He put the flag of the Union, the flag of my homeland. hi
    2. prapor75m
      prapor75m April 25 2018 09: 10
      +3
      How did you get hexagonal “agents of influence” already in VO, did you come up with this article in the Israeli media?
    3. Astoria
      Astoria April 25 2018 09: 10
      +5
      Observers believe that, Russia is preparing for war with Iran, in the Caspian ....
      Thank you, thank you, which observers think so? Moyshi and Rabinovichi? laughing good
  19. Topotun
    Topotun April 25 2018 08: 56
    +1
    How are these "partners" already getting started. So they throw out the lit matches in the fuel storage ..... And then someone will again say that the situation has gotten out of control ....
  20. Heterocapsa
    Heterocapsa April 25 2018 09: 17
    +3
    it’s better to put such a picture in the subject

    1. Chichikov
      Chichikov April 25 2018 14: 23
      0
      Dad leads a minor to the school of American exclusivity ...
  21. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov April 25 2018 09: 18
    0
    Hold on Iran, the Jews of the world will not leave you alone ... Again they are preparing disgusting things! Russia will not leave you in trouble, as if "our lobby" in the government did not dream about it. The main thing is a common policy and support for each other, though not explicit!
  22. Old26
    Old26 April 25 2018 10: 15
    0
    Quote: Aleks713
    By the way, if Turkey nevertheless succumbs to pressure from the United States and NATO and does not acquire the S-400, then why not sell them to Iran? Iran, I think, will not refuse. And since air defense systems are a defensive weapon, there are NO legal restrictions on the sale of S-400 to Iran. This will be another hello to our Western "partners" and Israel.


    Of course he will not refuse. The only question is, how beneficial is it to us in the long run? You perfectly understand that with the air defense that Iran has, they will not be able to contain the blow of the coalition. Deliveries of our air defense systems are not so great. EMNIP S-300 in the amount of 4 divisions. S-400, if they deliver, then also not dozens of divisions. What's next? Hypothetically? Iran is being hit. Despite the downed coalition planes, these complexes will be hit. And the fact that then the whole Western press will be full of photographs of the broken launchers from the S-300 / S-400 and screaming that Russian weapons are no good, there is no doubt at all. The image of Russian weapons will be seriously damaged and those wishing to buy it will be significantly reduced. Although everyone will perfectly understand that there could be no other way in such a situation.
    Here it is necessary and to think, to what line in deliveries to us to go and whether to go at all?

    Quote: Chertt
    Trump and Macron went crazy. This is not even surrender. This is a self-shot suggestion.

    Well, with Trump, everything is clear. He has everything, he didn’t sign it - everything is bad. In relation to Marcon - in general, complete misunderstandings. He didn’t read the agreement. which his country signed? What are these idiotic proposals to stop any nuclear activity by 2025? He’s ate too much. The agreement says in black and white that
    • For 15 years, that is, until 2030, Iran ceases uranium enrichment in excess of the required percentage for
    obtaining fuel for nuclear power plants
    • For 20 years, the IAEA has controlled all of Iran’s nuclear facilities
    • All uranium enriched to a level of 20% is exported outside of Iran and is "discharged" to the level necessary to obtain fuel for nuclear power plants
    • Of the nearly 20 thousand centrifuges, most of them are dismantled. only 3000 remain (or 6000 - I don’t remember anymore, I have to look)
    • The production of heavy water is limited to 20 tons per year and this heavy water is supplied to the world market for sale
    • Excess heavy water (and the plant’s capacity is just over 20 tons) is stored outside Iran

    Now what are they trying to offer? Shorter validity period? And where does Iran’s missile program. Initially, they tried to "fasten" it to the nuclear one, but it became clear that then it would be impossible to agree on anything. As long as Iran has no charge, all of its missile programs do not pose a particular threat to neighbors, since the same long-range missile defense capability of Iran is quite large, and to inflict heavy damage on a 500 kg warhead, when you have a 1-2 km missile defense,
    Yes, Iran’s latest development does not fit somewhat. For RGCh weighing 150-250 kg is nonsense, but so far Iran does not have nuclear weapons - let it play.

    Now this agreement can be multiplied by zero, and instead of forgetting about nuclear Iran for 15 years, you can get a country with Islamic fundamentalism and even with a nuclear club. That's it, the neighbors will be happy ...

    Quote: Aleks713
    And if the United States and its partners, ignoring the opinion of not only Iran, but also Russia and China, try to change the terms of the nuclear deal or even get out of it, then it is logical for Russia to withdraw from restrictions on the sale of other weapons systems to Iran. For example, Su-30 and Su-35 aircraft ... Therefore, we must now begin to prepare Iranian pilots for these aircraft in Russia.

    Iran for us only a fellow traveler and by no means a friend and ally. We have problems with this country, including and in the Caspian. In particular, we could not agree on hydrocarbons with Iran, unlike our former union republics. And what kind of mania is to saturate your neighbor, who considered you just a few years ago almost as much as an enemy like the United States with new weapons? We have our Air Force "packed" with SU-30 and SU-35 vehicles, what is called full?

    Quote: siberalt
    Forcing Tehran to ask Russia to come to them with our military bases? lol

    That is, when Iran didn’t “lock it up”, it simply sent us with a military base, and when did it “lock it up” to agree to our bases? The question is, will we need this?
  23. Bronevick
    Bronevick April 25 2018 11: 10
    0
    This is our chance for cooperation with Iran.
  24. 1536
    1536 April 25 2018 14: 41
    0
    Macrons with trump in Iranian. And Vaska listens, but eats.
  25. askme
    askme April 25 2018 15: 35
    +1
    Dreaming, wretched)
    Iran needs this agreement no more than these two))
    The threats of war have recently brought him to an understandable position against Iran, when Iran, with its developed means of delivery, wants to have a nuclear bomb up its sleeve. He needed an agreement for peaceful development. And for war he needs nuclear weapons. In order to bury all her enemies there ... Russia against the background of a global collision on her because of her position in Syria, the presence of Iran’s nuclear deterrent only compensates for Israel’s nuclear threat and Russia, of course, will not put forward any feuds against Iran. Iran is Russia's ally in Syria. That is, the aggravation of the Israeli-Syrian graters caused by Israeli attacks on Syria is really the stupidity of Israel itself. He himself digs the grave stubbornly. And from all sides. Amazing people, Jewish fanatics, who sincerely consider themselves “chosen”, not noticing reality. They are no less dangerous Wahhabis ...


    Of course, Russia will officially regret such a decision by Iran. But he will immediately indicate the aggressiveness and inadequacy of his opponents. That is, officially accusing Russia of something will not work for the Western lesson, alas)))
    1. askme
      askme April 25 2018 15: 53
      +1
      By the way, if after that, due to the cooperation of Russia and Iran on Syria, Russia will begin to be pressured even more by sanctions, etc., it will be generally beneficial for Russia to conclude a military alliance with Iran over Syria and Iran. That is, if, for example, Iran is attacked in Syria, or even less so, Iran is attacked, Iran’s nuclear facilities, say, Russia enters the war, protects Iran from external aggression. And only from external aggression. Of course, Iran should guarantee its worthy behavior in this case, guarantee that among its goals there is no purpose to destroy Israel. If it doesn’t, then it will end Then we will be on the circumstances ...
      1. lance
        lance April 25 2018 21: 46
        0
        It is beneficial for Russia to enlist its strategy in the SCO, which it does. If the impossible happens and the SCO really unites with the United States scribe, and they understand this very well.
  26. NF68
    NF68 April 26 2018 14: 49
    0
    Those again "in the course of the game" will change the rules.