Military Review

We will apply the resolution of 1950 of the year “Unity for Peace”. The UN Security Council found a way to circumvent the veto of the Russian Federation

147
Western countries intend to use the UN resolution, which allows you to refer the issue of Syria from the UN Security Council to the General Assembly, Deutsche Welle reports with reference to The Guardian


We will apply the resolution of 1950 of the year “Unity for Peace”. The UN Security Council found a way to circumvent the veto of the Russian Federation


We are talking about the resolution “Unity for Peace” 1950 of the year - this allegedly could allow nine of the UN Security Council members 15 to submit the question to the UN GA. The proposal was made at a closed meeting of the permanent representatives to the UN in Sweden, so it will be discussed at several more meetings this week. Western states fear that the absence of a mechanism for establishing responsibility not only gives Syria the freedom to continue using chemical weapons, but also deals a serious blow to the international world order.

The publication writes that Russia 11 once used the right of veto to block actions against Syria. The words of the head of Amnesty International, who said that the Russian veto "should not lead to the end of collective efforts at the UN, are quoted."

Note that in 1950, this resolution was adopted in order to bypass the resistance of the USSR to launch a military action against North Korea and give it the appearance of compulsory measures against the violator of peace on behalf of the international community.

Since the beginning of 1950, the model of action proposed by Unity for Peace has been applied several times, but has never been used to organize hostilities.

We will remind that earlier, several proposals were made to change the UN Charter in order to deprive the permanent members of the Security Council, including Russia, the veto rights. In 2016, Russia and the United States jointly opposed the proposal of Great Britain and France to restrict the right of veto, reports Sight
147 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. SlavaS
    SlavaS April 24 2018 18: 52
    +38
    Blah blah blah, why shake the air, if the one with the guns is right, the cartridges don’t end, why is this whole theater with the UN.
    1. Cat
      Cat April 24 2018 18: 53
      +19
      China also forget to ask?
      1. Hunter 2
        Hunter 2 April 24 2018 18: 56
        +22
        Even so, in vain, I bought stews. God - enlighten people!
        1. Hire
          Hire April 24 2018 19: 26
          +20
          Quote: Hunter 2
          Even so, in vain, I bought stews. God - enlighten people!

          They did it right. Where the “Veto” right ends, there begins the “no answer” right. This time they want to leave Syria unanswered.
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov April 24 2018 19: 34
            +16
            Quote: Hire
            This time they want to leave Syria unanswered.

            Precedent.
            With Syria at the General Assembly, the initiators will still have to suffer a lot.
            And then Israel rakes. With one hundred percent probability. And there you won’t have to suffer.

            So these are the same horror stories as around the “veto right”.
            1. NIKNN
              NIKNN April 24 2018 19: 41
              +21
              Quote: Spade
              Precedent.

              So I think, where are our lawyers? We ve damn a whole generation of lawyers with economists raised ... what
              1. Logall
                Logall April 24 2018 20: 09
                +8
                Quote: NIKNN
                We ve damn a whole generation of lawyers with economists raised ...

                Nikolay, these lawyers have diplomas - bought! For a long time everyone knows how the session is set ...
                And the diploma itself is put in a ruble bag with the inscription "Thank you for your purchase."
                The right car control too ... So, by the way ...
                1. BZTM
                  BZTM April 24 2018 20: 15
                  +10
                  I’m on my purchased rights for the third dozen, Sanya, and so what? I’m 5th coming, and I’m not going to go to the traffic police, there’s no time, worries are full of mouth ... Not a single fine, if that ... It’s just legal to get them on the collective farm ours-hemorrrrr .... laughingIt’s easier to buy, we need them in our remote places ......... to bring firewood from the forest, to plow the earth with a walk-behind tractor, but there’s a lot for that ... wink
                  1. NEOZ
                    NEOZ April 24 2018 20: 29
                    +32
                    Quote: BZTM
                    on the purchased rights the third ten ride

                    with this approach, do not complain about the doctors, you and your family of treating, maybe you will come across a doctor with a diploma bought but without fatal outcomes in patients ...
                    1. BZTM
                      BZTM April 24 2018 20: 32
                      +9
                      But I don’t complain, I don’t have time to complain about our konovalov! We repaired all our parents in Germany, thanks to God and Rodn, who lives in Germany ... winkYou have always relied on yourself, and not on the authorities - you will wait for help from them, how ... am
                      1. NEOZ
                        NEOZ April 24 2018 20: 35
                        +17
                        Quote: BZTM
                        we are in germany

                        such as you, who bought the rights, roll out children on the asphalt ....
                        well done!!!!
                        probably in Germany, too, buy the rights ......
                    2. demo
                      demo April 25 2018 06: 25
                      +3
                      What's this!
                      And the pilot, with a fake certificate?
                      What about a civil engineer?
                      And off we go.
                      The doctor will kill one.
                      And here hundreds and hundreds of corpses.
                2. hrych
                  hrych April 24 2018 20: 33
                  +12
                  Quote: Logall
                  these lawyers have diplomas - bought!

                  Well, do not exaggerate. Namely, the trouble is that in these positions the medalists are excellent pupils, and we need troopers, they better find a way to get out and bend the opponent laughing
                  I want to add by international structures and world order, which the United Nations undoubtedly is:
                  The other day they discussed about Turkish gold withdrawn from the Fed in the form of almost 30 tons, but another 30 tons were withdrawn by Turkish private banks. But the Bundesbank then withdrew 300 tons, the Netherlands brought out another 100 tons. They took it, and the Turks bought 187 tons, not dollars, i.e. also past the checkout counter. Russia is the first in gold purchases, China is not far behind. Okay, Russia is an enemy of order, and the rest they think. Rodents ran from the ship ... apparently something with the ship.
                  1. Baloo
                    Baloo April 24 2018 21: 00
                    +3
                    Quote: hrych
                    Recently discussed about Turkish gold

                    Therefore, a coup d'etat and arranged. Surprisingly, after that, Turkey is still a "member" of NATO fool
                    1. Olegovi4
                      Olegovi4 April 24 2018 22: 03
                      0
                      Quote: Balu
                      Surprisingly, after that, Turkey is still a "member" of NATO

                      so who will drive her out? she in the ranks of this outhouse managed to buy weapons from the enemy (i.e. Russia), and if it comes out, it can lie down under Uncle Vova)))
                  2. Orionvit
                    Orionvit April 24 2018 21: 13
                    +3
                    Quote: hrych
                    I want to add by international structures and world order, which the United Nations undoubtedly is:

                    To prove his case at the UN is the same as playing one with a gang of cheaters in cards. Viewers of this game see that the game is not fair, but they will never say. For as they say, your health is more expensive. That's how we live. It reminds me of Ukraine, where the deputies complain that the constitution supposedly does not work. And no one will directly say that the basic law does not work, simply because everyone put a big bolt on it. That's the whole UN.
              2. novel66
                novel66 April 24 2018 20: 25
                +7
                Kohl, our lawyers - S-300, I hope, delivered, Syria. to bring down all kinds of coalition, Jews, and everyone who just wanted to fly in the Syrian sky
                1. NIKNN
                  NIKNN April 24 2018 20: 29
                  +12
                  Quote: novel xnumx
                  Jews, and everyone who just wanted to fly in the Syrian sky

                  Jews forbade defending themselves from them ... Today it was here ... So it is so ... belay
                  1. novel66
                    novel66 April 24 2018 20: 38
                    +9
                    a matter of strength, Assad will have enough strength - shut up and wash themselves
                2. MadCat
                  MadCat April 25 2018 01: 59
                  0
                  Quote: novel xnumx
                  Kohl, our lawyers - S-300, I hope, delivered, Syria. to bring down all kinds of coalition, Jews, and everyone who just wanted to fly in the Syrian sky

                  it’s you from Zimbabwe which thread can take cover with this c300 like a fig leaf, and not from the largest air forces in the BV.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
              3. Lopatov
                Lopatov April 24 2018 21: 00
                +1
                Quote: NIKNN
                So I think, where are our lawyers?

                And what about ours? American This is not in their interests, as well as the abolition of the veto.
              4. Oleg14774
                Oleg14774 April 24 2018 22: 09
                0
                Quote: NIKNN
                Quote: Spade
                Precedent.

                So I think, where are our lawyers? We ve damn a whole generation of lawyers with economists raised ... what

                Well ... in a famous place with their knowledge and skills, and most importantly with desires.
              5. Dam
                Dam April 24 2018 22: 16
                0
                It would be better to learn to shoot. Something seems to me that without war this time we won’t figure it out
          2. PSih2097
            PSih2097 April 24 2018 19: 59
            +4
            Quote: Hire
            They did it right. Where the “Veto” right ends, there begins the “no answer” right.

            1. mig29mks
              mig29mks April 24 2018 20: 14
              +4
              Cynicism rolls over "to wreak havoc and devastation with the slogan of the struggle for peace" someone said "that there will be no third world war, but there will be such a struggle for peace that they will not leave stone unturned"
              1. Logall
                Logall April 24 2018 21: 11
                +5
                Quote: mig29mks
                such a struggle for peace that they will not leave stone unturned "

                I have such a dilemma:
                I do not want war, but I want to bomb America - how to deal with it?
                1. Oleg14774
                  Oleg14774 April 24 2018 22: 10
                  +1
                  Quote: Logall
                  Quote: mig29mks
                  such a struggle for peace that they will not leave stone unturned "

                  I have such a dilemma:
                  I do not want war, but I want to bomb America - how to deal with it?

                  You know, I have the same desire, but despite the fact that ordinary Americans still do not suffer, I feel sorry for them!
        2. Orkraider
          Orkraider April 24 2018 20: 45
          0
          Quote: Hunter 2
          d 2 (Alexey Alexandrovich) Today, 18:56 ↑ New
          Even so, in vain, I bought stews. God - enlighten people!

          So do I. And salt yet. And instead of matches, cricket lighters with flint. Considered that they are more profitable, by weight / volume / coefficient. And in addition to tushenka, he took sublimates. They have a longer shelf life.
      2. SlavaS
        SlavaS April 24 2018 18: 56
        +1
        they look like worms in manure, swarming, swarming, people would be better thought.
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 April 24 2018 19: 22
          +31
          How did these US get!
          1. INTER
            INTER April 24 2018 19: 24
            +11
            The victory of Stalinist diplomacy

            Stalin’s proposal to include all the Soviet republics in the UN as independent members naturally provoked heated objections in England and the USA. And they were reasonable. For, at that time, the republics of the USSR, unlike the British dominions (Canada, etc.), were not states. They could not even be called "likeness to a certain statehood."
            Understanding this, Stalin urgently introduces the attributes of statehood for the Union republics. In 1944, the republics of the USSR suddenly became "sovereign states." 28.01.1944/XNUMX/XNUMX at the next (the only one for all years of the war) Plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), a decision was made to expand the rights of the Union republics in the field of defense and foreign policy. On the same day, the session of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR adopted two laws: “On the formation of military units of the Union republics” and “On the provision of powers to the Union republics in the field of foreign relations”.
            On the basis of these decisions, amendments were instantly made to the Constitution of the USSR and to the constitution of the Union republics. This was explained to the people by "successes in resolving national issues in the USSR and the triumph of Leninist national politics."
            Indeed, in all republics of the USSR, their own people's commissariats of foreign affairs, which existed until 1946, were actually established. Moreover, on March 11.03.1944, 2, the People's Commissar of Defense of Ukraine, Lieutenant General V.P. Gerasimenko, was appointed and Ukraine for a short period of time began to possess its own armed forces that existed in parallel with the Soviet Army. [XNUMX]
            The Americans did not understand the plan of Stalin. On this occasion, US Ambassador to the USSR A. Harriman expressed his surprise and misunderstanding. “It is really strange,” he informed the White House, “that defense and foreign affairs were chosen for decentralization, whereas, in our opinion, these two functions are considered such, thanks to which the Center retains its authority.”
            [edit] Why Belarus and Ukraine?
            In the West, because of the reluctance to admit the defeat of their diplomacy before, as they believed, the dropouts from the USSR, when creating the UN, they mainly explain the inclusion of Belarus and Ukraine by the fact that England and the United States agreed to include these two republics in the UN for their great contribution to defeat of Germany. In fact, this thesis does not hold water. The contribution of all the republics of the USSR to the Victory over Germany is almost equal: it is foolish to say that only Ukrainians and Belarusians fought with the Germans, and Kazakhs, Russians, Georgians and others sat at home and waited for the war to end.
            Stalin’s games with the creation of “paper sovereignty” of the republics of course could not convince England and the United States. They were categorically against the inclusion in the founders of the UN of all 15 republics of the USSR. This was the clear position of England. But the position of the United States in 1944 began to gradually change, and not without the help of the "actor" Stalin. And this is primarily due to the powerful pressure of Jewish US millionaires on American politicians. Here, all the talent of Stalin manifested itself as a politician and diplomat.
            In 1944, even before the creation of Israel, the Jewish Jewish oligarchs of the United States had a fix idea - the creation of Jewish autonomy in Belarus and Ukraine with the capital in Gomel. Why exactly here? Everything is very simple. On the historical lands of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Poland, Belarus and Ukraine), 500/2 of all the Jews of the planet lived for approximately 3 years before the war. Proposals for the creation of Jewish statehood (including a number of territories of Belarus and Northern Ukraine) were sent to the United States to Stalin.
            Jewish-born American millionaires born in Belarus and Ukraine were ready to bear all the costs of the post-war reconstruction of the Gomel and Vitebsk regions and a number of other regions of Belarus and Ukraine - with the restoration of industry and infrastructure, with the opening of new enterprises and social protection of the population, including huge pensions to all war veterans.
            Stalin did not refuse, but allegedly showed interest in discussing the topic. As a result, the United States, hoping for the possibility of creating a Jewish Autonomy with a capital in Gomel, agreed to include Belarus and Ukraine in the founding countries of the UN, since the goal of the Jewish diaspora in the United States was to create a Jewish state in Europe with a capital in Gomel.
            As a result, Stalin was able to deceive the United States, having carried out at least two out of 15 Soviet republics at the UN under the cover of America’s concern with the "Jewish question"
            1. high
              high April 24 2018 19: 30
              +2
              You can confirm this nonsense with links?
              1. INTER
                INTER April 24 2018 19: 34
                +10
                Quote: alta
                You can confirm this nonsense with links?

                You are welcome. http://cyclowiki.org/wiki/Ukraine_and_Belorussia_ka
                UN_ Members
                1. Piramidon
                  Piramidon April 24 2018 20: 22
                  +2
                  Quote: INTER
                  Please.

                  Cyclopedia is much truer and cooler than Wikipedia. good
                2. YELLOWSTONE
                  YELLOWSTONE April 25 2018 01: 06
                  0
                  there is no such “unity” without someone
                  The Uzbek SSR was still a member of the UN; the RSFSR was not
                  and at that meeting in Korea, the Soviet special representative overslept,
                  there are hundreds of draft resolutions rejected due to the US veto over Israel, and there were no more “against” people.
                  1. zoolu350
                    zoolu350 April 25 2018 05: 52
                    +1
                    The meeting in Korea, the Soviet representative "overslept", because it was necessary to "bleed" the mattresses and other lackeys of the owners of the Fed, until the number of CBN and their delivery vehicles reached the required level.
              2. Awaz
                Awaz April 24 2018 20: 45
                +2
                this is not nonsense. I know for sure that in the territory of the USSR after the war they really intended to create autonomy for Jews somewhere in the European part. Well, that is, this personality was pushed through by the theme, even in the power structures of the USSR, some individuals who, however, later got good lyuley and maybe camps. I know the topic superficially, but the fact is real. I also know that Ukraine was definitely the territory on which they were supposed to create autonomy ..
                1. Baloo
                  Baloo April 24 2018 21: 02
                  +4
                  Quote: AwaZ
                  I also know that Ukraine was definitely the territory on which they were supposed to create autonomy.

                  This was discussed with Lenin in exchange for a loan, which the Americans had dumped on him. In Yalta, Stalin closed this question and did not give Crimea to the Zionists.
                  1. KaPToC
                    KaPToC April 24 2018 22: 16
                    +3
                    Quote: Balu
                    Crimea did not give the Zionists.

                    Crimea and the entire Black Sea coast of the USSR.
                2. helmi8
                  helmi8 April 24 2018 22: 14
                  +1
                  Quote: AwaZ
                  I know for sure that in the territory of the USSR after the war they were really going to create autonomy for Jews somewhere in the European part

                  But what about the Jewish Autonomous Region formed in 1934?
                  1. zoolu350
                    zoolu350 April 25 2018 14: 18
                    0
                    Quote: helmi8
                    But what about the Jewish Autonomous Region formed in 1934?

                    You must admit that Joseph Vissarionovich had a sense of humor and this saddened a bunch of Zionists (fascists).
              3. Standard
                Standard April 24 2018 21: 01
                +3
                Quote: alta
                This nonsense

                In fact, this is true.
                But the interpretation (interpretation) - may vary among interpreters.
                But back in 1934 in Belarus the 2nd state. the language (national) was Yiddish. It is a fact.
            2. Rurikovich
              Rurikovich April 24 2018 20: 12
              +2
              Quote: INTER
              As a result, the United States, hoping for the possibility of creating a Jewish Autonomy with its capital in Gomel, agreed to include Belarus and Ukraine in the founding countries of the UN,

              "The Jewish community was formed in Turov in the 1897th century. In the 2252th century, Turov entered the" Pale of Settlement. "In 4290, Jews in Turov already totaled 52,3 people out of XNUMX of all residents, or XNUMX% of the total population of the city."
              So the motives of the United States are not unfounded ... hi
          2. Hunter 2
            Hunter 2 April 24 2018 19: 26
            +11
            Klasssss !!!! hi Maybe we crave - across Australia ??? Kenguryatina - not tasty! No. Who do they need ??? belay and far from us! repeat
            1. SRC P-15
              SRC P-15 April 24 2018 19: 29
              +4
              Quote: Hunter 2
              Maybe we crave - across Australia ??? Kenguryatina - not tasty!

              I feel sorry for the rabbits ... crying
              1. Baloo
                Baloo April 24 2018 19: 31
                +4
                Quote: SRC P-15
                Quote: Hunter 2
                Maybe we crave - across Australia ??? Kenguryatina - not tasty!

                I feel sorry for the rabbits ... crying

                Rabbits are tastier than kenguryatina. good
                1. SRC P-15
                  SRC P-15 April 24 2018 19: 35
                  +6
                  Quote: Balu
                  Rabbits are tastier than kenguryatina.

                  I agree! good Although I have not tried kangaroo, but rabbits are still tastier! lol
                  1. Hunter 2
                    Hunter 2 April 24 2018 19: 44
                    +5
                    I did not read, but I condemn .... wassat The main thing is that New Zealand is not hooked! smile It is beautiful there!!! hi
                  2. muhomor
                    muhomor April 24 2018 20: 17
                    +1
                    Kenguryatin you ate. They just didn’t know. In 2012, almost 3000 tons of kenguryat was imported into the Russian Federation for sausage processing.
                    1. Baloo
                      Baloo April 24 2018 21: 08
                      +2
                      Quote: muhomor
                      Kenguryatin you ate. They just didn’t know.

                      She is now being imported. I don’t eat shop sausage and dumplings, although shops are simply overwhelmed with this good. Tastier than homemade dumplings and boiled pork in the store you will not find, and cheaper.
                  3. g1washntwn
                    g1washntwn April 25 2018 10: 28
                    +1
                    Rabbits in Australia are British invaders. We crave for the interventionists nuclerenbaton!
            2. NIKNN
              NIKNN April 24 2018 19: 51
              +2
              Biologists have implanted a tiny human brain into a mouse

              The mouse looked and behaved like an ordinary mouse, supplying blood and nutrients to the developing human brain for months at a time.
              The mouse did not even notice, and no one noticed. No, don’t think it’s not an American who was transplanted, but any of those mongrels who sit and indulge garbage in the UN! In the UN, there’s nothing to be done about any shelloon ...
            3. Olegovi4
              Olegovi4 April 24 2018 22: 06
              0
              Quote: Hunter 2
              Maybe we crave - across Australia ??? Kenguryatina - not tasty!

              so maybe still on the mattress? or are you going to pale black-red "hot" to indulge?
          3. Hire
            Hire April 24 2018 20: 05
            +5
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            How did these US get!

            Even the cat has Russia in its head, and in the anus of the USA. laughing
          4. Star
            Star April 24 2018 21: 21
            +2
            And the cat’s heart is Syria?
    2. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov April 24 2018 20: 15
      +11
      The decision to conduct a POLICE operation in Korea was ultimately taken by the UN Security Council due to the lack of a veto recalled by the Soviet ambassador. The resolution itself contradicts the provisions of the UN Charter:

      - with article 1, paragraph 12 - according to it, the General Assembly cannot give any recommendations regarding a dispute or situation in respect of which the Security Council performs the functions assigned to it, unless the Security Council requests it;

      - with Article 106 - according to it, before the creation of the international armed forces of the United Nations, responsibility for maintaining international peace and security is carried out through consultations of the five permanent members of the Security Council with each other and with other members of the Organization, and not in any other way.

      So, this is one of the meaningless resolutions extended by the States. Again, the resolution itself leaves the decision to the Security Council.
      1. neri73-r
        neri73-r April 24 2018 20: 49
        +6
        At least someone is reading documents! Sit down - five! hi laughing
        1. Standard
          Standard April 24 2018 21: 07
          0
          Quote: neri73-r
          At least someone is reading documents!

          And what's the use?
          According to the content of UN documents, Ukraine is an aggressor (cut off water, cut off electric power and much more similar) ....... Has anyone given a hint about the aggressive behavior of Ukraine? And here is the result.
    3. Lavrenti Pavlovich
      Lavrenti Pavlovich April 24 2018 22: 03
      +1
      The USSR once created the UN, Russia in which case can disperse. Russia has long had to draw the “red line” of the impudence of the Anglo-Saxons, enshrine in the Constitution that Russia can inflict a devastating nuclear strike: for the deliberate damage caused by any country to the Russian economy (sanctions, revision of the rules at the UN ...), for insulting the Russian Federation by senior officials other states (president, prime minister, foreign minister, ...) for the abduction of citizens of the Russian Federation (deportation of our citizens to the United States) ...
      1. helmi8
        helmi8 April 24 2018 22: 18
        0
        Quote: Lavrenty Pavlovich
        The USSR once created the UN, Russia in which case can disperse.

        The UN was created at the initiative of Roosevelt, if that ... smile
        https://ria.ru/spravka/20100425/225397629.html
        1. helmi8
          helmi8 April 24 2018 22: 29
          0
          And here is still
          https://studfiles.net/preview/2851899/page:12/
        2. Lavrenti Pavlovich
          Lavrenti Pavlovich April 24 2018 23: 23
          +1
          If Stalin had not supported the founding of the UN, then there would have been nothing, if Stalin had not destroyed Hitler, then no one remembered Roosevelt for a long time, and also about England.
      2. KaPToC
        KaPToC April 24 2018 22: 22
        +1
        Quote: Lavrenty Pavlovich
        The USSR once created the UN, Russia, in which case, can disperse

        Neither Russia nor the United States will “disperse” the UN; they have too many privileges in this organization. Remember what events the UN appeared after! When creating a new organization, you will need to accomplish something as epic.
        1. Tatyana Hurricane
          Tatyana Hurricane April 25 2018 11: 53
          +1
          KARTOS, now the UN is good for Russia only thanks to the VETO rule, if it doesn’t, then the western corpus, which is now joined by those that exist only thanks to Russia, but have absolutely lost their independence and well-being, having joined the states, one of our decisions, except suicide, will not be missed, so we will have absolutely nothing to do at the UN, and we will be 100% donkeys if we stay there after the cancellation of the veto
    4. Tatyana Hurricane
      Tatyana Hurricane April 25 2018 11: 44
      0
      Glory, the whole horror is that now only one cartridge is enough to destroy some states at all and there are not many guns needed, and the aggressor always comes first
  2. Dezinto
    Dezinto April 24 2018 18: 53
    +9
    They pretend that something else is being decided. Second League of Nations. What happened after everyone remembers ..... recourse
  3. pvv113
    pvv113 April 24 2018 18: 55
    +19
    Something seems to me that soon we will play a funeral at the UN
    1. Russia
      Russia April 24 2018 19: 35
      +8
      They will expose us with honors, or maybe without. The United Nations in America and all things there.
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 April 24 2018 19: 52
        +2
        And the states feed this office, without embarrassing anyone or anything
    2. dahpaz
      dahpaz April 24 2018 19: 35
      +4
      Quote: pvv113
      Something seems to me that soon we will play a funeral at the UN


      It is quite possible ... only they will be disconnected from artificial respiration ... to staff
      Geopolitical euthanasia is only at hand.
      The topic of organizations' incapacity and calls to abolish or reformat It is already becoming "hackneyed" nevertheless it is better with it than without it ... the UN will not become ... a signal that the end station will soon ...


      ..
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 April 24 2018 19: 50
        +7
        The League of Nations had a similar fate, which also lost its legal capacity and authority.
    3. sabakina
      sabakina April 24 2018 20: 49
      +3
      Quote: pvv113
      Something seems to me that soon we will play a funeral at the UN

      Vladimir, surpass the left shoulder. The league has fallen apart, the First World War has begun; we omit the question of the beginning of WWII. Do you want to destroy the UN and ... hello Third? ...
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 April 24 2018 21: 07
        +3
        Glory, hello! The League of Nations was dispersed in 1946, when they realized that it was useless. And I don’t want the third world myself - the garden has not yet plowed wink
        1. sabakina
          sabakina April 24 2018 21: 10
          +3
          Volodya, the garden and the bombs will be plowed; the main crop in this garden is to grow and harvest. wink
          1. pvv113
            pvv113 April 24 2018 21: 18
            +5
            Manure bombs will smash the bombs from my garden to the neighbors - it will be a shame wink
      2. Standard
        Standard April 24 2018 21: 08
        0
        Quote: sabakina
        hello third? ...

        Now we have trump cards.
        And what will happen next....
        1. sabakina
          sabakina April 24 2018 21: 12
          +1
          Tarot cards must be scattered, but I don’t have them. request
  4. Oleg Kozlov
    Oleg Kozlov April 24 2018 18: 57
    +7
    Jackals teamed up with hyenas in a bloodthirsty flock and want to eat. Words and persuasion cannot be stopped. Moreover, we all want to be friends with them. And they use us as "canned food"
    1. Slovak
      Slovak April 24 2018 19: 38
      +2
      It's just that punks, like the Swedes, do not really understand what a rocket is, sinking a warship, or shooting down a combat aircraft. In the pictures and in the cinema, it’s not at all scary, that’s why they are worn out.
  5. kventinasd
    kventinasd April 24 2018 18: 57
    +24
    Such a maneuver is not new, it is possible to put the question to the UN General Assembly, but this will not be a UN decision, but a GA recommendation, and all UN decisions will need to be confirmed again in the Security Council with the right of veto in Russia.
    The VETO right is saving the WORLD from nuclear war so far. SIMPLE to someone, apparently LIFE is tired.
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 April 24 2018 19: 00
      +10
      No, they just think there that we are tired of living it.
      1. kventinasd
        kventinasd April 24 2018 19: 05
        +2
        Well, let them think, but we have already pinched their tail, but they will show off, they will rake like in Vietnam, only it will be worse.
        1. Doliva63
          Doliva63 April 25 2018 07: 26
          +4
          Quote: kventinasd
          Well, let them think, but we have already pinched their tail, but they will show off, they will rake like in Vietnam, only it will be worse.

          There was a war of ideologies in Vietnam. And here, if anything, there will be an imperialist war - a redistribution of zones of political influence and markets. Neither one nor the other is for the benefit of ordinary Syrians or you and me, because, by and large, the Syrians do not care who will exploit them - their own or others, this does not change the essence, but they will spend money on war, again not Deripasok, but rpmovichs, but budget ones, that is, ours with you. Or do you think that if we win, they will throw us a pension? laughing
    2. helmi8
      helmi8 April 24 2018 19: 09
      0
      Quote: kventinasd
      Such a maneuver is not new, it is possible to put the question to the UN General Assembly, but this will not be a UN decision, but a GA recommendation, and all UN decisions will need to be confirmed again in the Security Council with the right of veto in Russia.

      Have you carefully read about the 1950 resolution? It was then that the Security Council could not make a decision on Korea. And the issue was decided by the vote of the UN General Assembly, and not the Security Council. It is because of this and all the fuss so that the United States could push through its decision, bypassing the right of veto of Russia.
      1. kventinasd
        kventinasd April 24 2018 19: 16
        +1
        The United States needs a UN-authorized war for the common territory of Syria and Iraq in order to drive smuggled oil out of there and influence its price in such a way as to have one strong lever of pressure on Russia, and not to spin up its own arms race and not increase the US government debt even more. but if we behave through our sleeves, they will eventually write off us. I’m thinking it won’t reach it because the stakes are too high. So we will sink their fleet and utilize the bases that dare threaten us.
        1. helmi8
          helmi8 April 24 2018 19: 22
          +3
          Quote: kventinasd
          US needs UN-authorized war

          Over the past decades, I can’t remember something when they needed someone’s permission ... They have long scored on the UN and all its decisions. If you notice, then even when discussing any issue at the UN, they refer to their laws and constitution, and not to international law ...
          1. kventinasd
            kventinasd April 24 2018 19: 28
            0
            Quote: helmi8
            refer to their laws and constitution, and not to international law ...

            This is not the case now.
      2. Baloo
        Baloo April 24 2018 19: 32
        +4
        Quote: helmi8
        You read carefully about the 1950 resolution

        Our delegation then left the meeting and the decision was made without them.
        1. helmi8
          helmi8 April 24 2018 19: 35
          +1
          Quote: Balu
          Our delegation then left the meeting and the decision was made without them.

          And now they are also leading. Pocket allies will vote for the United States, the rest will abstain in order to avoid consequences, and we are in the minority.
          1. YELLOWSTONE
            YELLOWSTONE April 25 2018 01: 21
            0
            But the delegation is not leaving, and then Russia will veto it in the UN Security Council.
      3. Standard
        Standard April 24 2018 21: 12
        0
        Quote: helmi8
        And the issue was decided by the vote of the UN General Assembly, and not the Security Council.

        So then, it seems, our ambassador was recalled. Type boycotted meeting.
  6. flicker
    flicker April 24 2018 18: 59
    +2
    The unfortunate people will not calm down at all, everything is numb, they just sewed in one place, so they want peace in Syria, they simply can’t eat.
  7. K-50
    K-50 April 24 2018 19: 01
    +4
    The hungry ghouls will not get drunk of Syrian blood. sad
    1. Baloo
      Baloo April 24 2018 19: 35
      +1
      Quote: K-50
      The hungry ghouls will not get drunk of Syrian blood. sad

      They need oil, but the Syrians are in the way. Here is the collective west and Israel and Turkey that joined them, sent and fed the barmalei to squeeze or destroy the Syrians. These crocodiles need a territory, a springboard for future wars against China and Iran, and also an unfortunate country of Ukraine with a distraught organized crime group in power. Now Armenia will cause trouble too ..
      1. Awaz
        Awaz April 24 2018 20: 51
        +2
        oil there is a minor thing. The theme of the Arabs' war among themselves is being pushed by Jews. In general, the topic there is very complicated. But the war on this territory is beneficial to everyone: someone is saving their territory in this way, someone is selling weapons, and so on.
        1. Baloo
          Baloo April 24 2018 21: 06
          +1
          Quote: AwaZ
          oil there is a minor thing

          Do the neighbors have it? It is assumed that the largest undeveloped in Latakia.
          Before the war, Syria had for sale its oil 25% of the budget.
  8. Kent0001
    Kent0001 April 24 2018 19: 03
    +3
    As long as we do not give them a tough military response, it will be so. But the war, the third world war, the Amers do not need, what for then would they be their wealth? DOLLARS AS A PAPER IN A BUNKER TO STOVE A FURNACE?
  9. Eduard petrov
    Eduard petrov April 24 2018 19: 06
    +1
    Well, get around and get around, not a tragedy. Norway, Denmark, Switzerland have no veto and nothing, they live. And they live well.
    1. konstantin68
      konstantin68 April 24 2018 19: 14
      +2
      Quote: Eduard Petrov
      Norway, Denmark, Switzerland no veto and nothing, live

      Russia doesn’t. Just look at the physical map.
      1. RedKors1953
        RedKors1953 April 24 2018 19: 27
        +2
        Konstantin 68. It’s not like that in Russia. Just look at the physical map. Well, a card as a card, God forbid everyone. But it’s better not to look at the leaders.
      2. Eduard petrov
        Eduard petrov April 24 2018 19: 29
        +1
        Quote: konstantin68
        Quote: Eduard Petrov
        Norway, Denmark, Switzerland no veto and nothing, live

        Russia doesn’t. Just look at the physical map.

        India is also big, Pakistan, if you are talking about the size, but in general, you don’t really understand about the map.
    2. Standard
      Standard April 24 2018 21: 13
      0
      Quote: Eduard Petrov
      And they live well.

      each has its own mission.
      1. Eduard petrov
        Eduard petrov April 24 2018 21: 16
        +1
        Thank you for your reply!
        What is our mission?
        Who defines her?
        What are the parameters?
        Based on what?
        What are the regulatory prerequisites? Constitution??
        1. Standard
          Standard April 24 2018 21: 48
          0
          [quote = Eduard Petrov] What is our mission?
          Who defines it? By what parameters?
          Based on what? What are the regulatory prerequisites? Constitution ?? [quote

          The creator sets the mission (even if an impersonal law acts in this role).
          Russia - unlike the listed countries - will not declare neutrality in case of war. at least because of meaninglessness. And the absence of such an option also structures the country's behavior.
          Since the Creator function is introduced, the parameters and grounds should be attributed to its competencies.
          And for people, the signs are in the biography of the country.
          Once upon a time - during the life of Fyodor Ioannovich - the Russian Church (which had just become autocephalous) was appointed to stand in the truth. The appointment was broadcast through 4 "base" churches, which formed together with the Russian Pentarchy. The Pentarchy, although disintegrated, did not cancel the appointment of the Russian Church. So since then we stand in the truth.
          The mission can also be calculated - to carry the Light.

          Something like that.
  10. keeper03
    keeper03 April 24 2018 19: 06
    +1
    The United States was invented by the United States to justify its bloody military incursions into sovereign states, now the UN has stopped working, but that does not stop them! request negative It's time to bring down scum in all directions !!! angry soldier
    1. Standard
      Standard April 24 2018 21: 14
      +1
      Quote: keeper03
      UN was invented by the USA

      Was Stalin nothing at all?
  11. avt
    avt April 24 2018 19: 09
    +11
    Note that in 1950, this resolution was adopted in order to bypass the resistance of the USSR to launch a military action against North Korea and give it the appearance of compulsory measures against the violator of peace on behalf of the international community.
    What is this frank nonsense! ?? What kind of a “workaround” ???! Was it really difficult even for a search engine to work on the authors of this pearl to find out - the representative of the USSR trite IGORED the UN Security Council meeting because of the non-recognition by the UN member of the People's Republic of China instead of Kuomintang Taiwan? That is, the USSR represented by its representative is simply I DO NOT VOTE AT OWN DESIRE. And all-ee-ee! There are no such cunning schemes, bypasses, stupidly and never existed.
  12. Herculesic
    Herculesic April 24 2018 19: 09
    +2
    Only strong Syria, capable of responding to arrogant assaults of aggressive neighbors beyond measure, as well as rotten nato and bastards from the usa, can be the best answer to any vilely accepted "veto".
  13. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx April 24 2018 19: 10
    +4
    Recall that previously repeatedly expressed proposals to amend the UN charter to deprive the permanent members of the Security Council, including Russia, the veto.

    This says only one thing: if the Russian Federation came to the aid of Syria and wants Assad to remain in power, it is necessary to hastily conclude an agreement on mutual assistance in case of aggression, put weapons in the Assad’s army and "peck" everyone who wants to settle on the territory of the sovereign state of "coalitioners" " Hollow so that no one would even think that somehow or somewhere there is a loophole ... request Or go out and not make people laugh with the agreed and worried battle tactics ... soldier
    1. st25310
      st25310 April 24 2018 19: 33
      0
      Urgently need a referendum!
  14. Lerych
    Lerych April 24 2018 19: 14
    +1
    And how did this 1950 resolution end? A mountain of corpses and then nuclear weapons in the DPRK now.
  15. Dezinto
    Dezinto April 24 2018 19: 19
    +2
    Yeah, and so they will continue in the same course, to set fire to the whole world again .....

    In 1921, the Council of the League of Nations adopted a resolution stating that economic sanctions should be the main weapon in the fight against the aggressor.

    RIA Novosti https://ria.ru/spravka/20110418/364864854.html


    At first:


    And then:

  16. Livonetc
    Livonetc April 24 2018 19: 26
    +2
    So the time will come.
    Syrian forces will begin to wonderfully sink and bring down the interventionists.
    But Russia is no stranger.
    All these creatures at one time invaded our country.
    Ordinary situation.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. daodejin
    daodejin April 24 2018 19: 44
    +4
    How does the United States sweep in one place. Goblins are not scared.
  19. Operator
    Operator April 24 2018 19: 51
    +4
    The resolution of the UN General Assembly of November 3 of November 1950 of the year “Unity for Peace” gives the General Assembly the right to make recommendations to members of the UN Security Council. And the UN Charter gives Security Council members the right to spit from a high bell tower on all recommendations of the General Assembly.

    Another joke was that in 1950 the chairman of the CPC Central Committee, Mao Zedong, and the chairman of the Central Committee of the DPRK Labor Party, Kim Il Sung, fully pressed I.V. Stalin on the subject of the outbreak of war on the Korean Peninsula with the aim of uniting North and South Korea under the rule of the communist regime. In the case of resistance from US forces located in South Korea, Stalin was invited to use Soviet nuclear weapons, which appeared only a year ago and which were only a few copies compared to more than a hundred nuclear weapons at the disposal of the United States.

    Stalin refused to participate in the adventure of Mao Zedong and Kim Il Sung, after which they organized their own invasion of South Korea - the North Koreans conducted military operations, the Chinese provided rear logistics. At the first stage, the North Koreans captured most of the enemy’s territory with the exception of several coastal bridgeheads on which the Americans defended.

    The United States raised a question in the UN Security Council on the recognition of the DPRK as an aggressor and the formation of international UN forces to repel the aggressor. JV Stalin, as a punishment to Mao Zedong and Kim Il Sung, ordered the Permanent Representative of the USSR to the UN Wyszynski not to attend the Security Council meeting so as not to use the veto right of the permanent member of the Council. As a result, the remaining members of the Security Council voted for the formation of international UN forces and their sending to the Korean Peninsula.

    UN international forces consisted of US troops and their allies, as a result of a counteroffensive, they liberated all of South Korea and occupied most of North Korea. After which, China replaced the North Koreans with a million Chinese and restored the status quo at the beginning of the 1950 year. The USSR provided logistical support to China with the help of fighter aircraft and anti-aircraft defense.

    So in the 1950 year, the UN General Assembly was not at work. The only way to get rid of the veto right of the Russian Federation is to leave those who wish to join the UN.
    1. sabakina
      sabakina April 24 2018 21: 08
      +1
      Andrei, I don’t understand this and you probably said everything correctly. But, as you now see, they spit on all points and commas in their own documents.
      1. Operator
        Operator April 24 2018 22: 10
        +1
        Do not give a damn and forget - Joseph Vissarionovich twisted as he wanted with 10 nuclear charges, and God himself told us with 150 thousands of thermonuclear am
  20. anjey
    anjey April 24 2018 20: 28
    +2
    It looks like the party of war in the world is winning, it’s a pity that politicians do not learn anything from history and the suffering of peoples is an empty phrase for them, there is an order for war and they are pulling us to the edge of the abyss ...
  21. Baloo
    Baloo April 24 2018 21: 03
    +1
    [quote = sabakina] [quote = pvv113] Something seems to me that soon we will play a funeral at the UN [/ quote]
    Vladimir, surpass the left shoulder. The league has fallen apart, the First World War has begun; we omit the question of the beginning of WWII. You wanna ruin the un [quote]
    and .... hello Third? .. [/ quote] Why the third? I think it’s about 9 or 10 already.
  22. Alecsandr
    Alecsandr April 24 2018 21: 06
    +1
    Repeatedly watched the "Satan" fly. A piece of smoky trail remains in the sky and a roar rumbles, and my soul has an alarming feeling - God forbid everyone will fly and will remain for all 20 minutes. The first world war ended, they shouted, let’s not repeat. But second world war. more people died, but someone, apparently, is not enough. And no UN helps from human stupidity. A generation of soldiers has grown up who did not see a live nuclear explosion. Previously, they saw the explosion with their own eyes and were a little afraid to use it. But now we have started talking about limited tactical use. And the UN is such a Pharisee and two-faced organization. After the Second World War, almost all wars were fought under the auspices of the UN and dictated by the "world hegemon" of democracy
  23. Alecsandr
    Alecsandr April 24 2018 21: 11
    0
    And there will be such a struggle for peace that from the world of stone from stone will not remain
  24. CYM
    CYM April 24 2018 21: 12
    0
    According to the resolution of the General Assembly “Unity for Peace” of November 3, 1950 (resolution 377 (V), the Assembly may also take action if the Security Council is unable to act due to a vote against one of the permanent members, if any reasons to perceive a threat to peace, a violation of the world or an act of aggression. It is very interesting, and who are the aggressors - whose troops are in Syria without legal grounds for that? USA, Turkey, Israel (Golan Heights) and possibly France and Great Britain.
    It would be nice to remember how the Korean War ended, the United States and its allies, squeezed into the UN, killed 4,5 million people. sad
  25. Chepa
    Chepa April 24 2018 21: 20
    0
    And what ended the war in Korea, and in Vietnam. And then the states had a military advantage, but now it would be better to shut up
  26. Olegovi4
    Olegovi4 April 24 2018 22: 12
    0
    those. the experience of getting lyuli during this “overpower”, read the thousands of bodies of your soldiers, the first time you didn’t teach a mattress and mattress covers? how is it on kaklyatsky - jump on a rake, jump more ....
  27. brandom8
    brandom8 April 24 2018 22: 39
    0
    This is called democracy.
    Since 76% chose Putin and he is a legitimate leader, then the vote of the world community will also be quite legitimate for himself.
  28. askme
    askme April 24 2018 22: 48
    0
    There is no such thing as a UN resolution. There is a UN Security Council resolution - a legitimate document. There is a resolution of the UN General Assembly. That's all, there are no other legally significant resolutions at the UN) What happened in 1950 is not a legitimate precedent from the point of view of the UN Charter. China is completely not interested in such a turn of events, so it will also block resolutions on Syria at the UN. Yes, and Bolivia and many others will say their word at hour X) The Skripals case was unconvincingly sent to Russia and in the Duma they could not work cleanly, urki. Lose their qualifications and lose in all positions))

    The West will be defeated in this))
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack April 24 2018 22: 57
      +1
      Quote: askme
      ... a legitimate document ... a legitimate precedent ...

      The whole world is crazy (c)
      It seems that in the Russian language there are only two adjectives left: liberal (it’s bad, wrong and generally - byaka) and legitimate (it’s, in short, pretty and kawaii). And all who are not lazy, stick them everywhere, no matter where.
      It's sad somehow request
      1. askme
        askme April 24 2018 23: 06
        0
        For general development, a special legal term in the RUSSIAN language:

        Legitimacy (from lat. Legitimus - lawful, lawful) - the consent of the people (citizens, people, and so on) with the government, when he (they) voluntarily recognizes her right to make binding decisions



        But the lessons are crazy, yes, trolls of honest Russian citizens from abroad .... But nothing will come of it. Lose)))))
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack April 25 2018 06: 21
          +1
          Quote: askme
          For general development, a special legal term in the RUSSIAN language

          Thank you, I am in the know yes
          But, nevertheless, the “legitimate document”, as well as the “legitimate precedent”, cause at least doubt in me request
          1. askme
            askme April 25 2018 11: 28
            0
            In this context, the stated topic is absolutely true connotation. In the Russian language, the linguistic norm "legitimate decision" has been established. By analogy, there is also a “legitimate document”, a “legitimate precedent”. In the latter case, it is true, since Anglo-Saxon law is a case-law. In this case, the precedent is not based on the UN Charter, therefore it is illegitimate. And even in case law it is not a legitimate precedent.
  29. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General April 24 2018 23: 26
    +1
    It started. Just like the League of Nations before the Great Patriotic War. The UN has exhausted itself.
  30. Finn67
    Finn67 April 24 2018 23: 32
    0
    [/ Quote]
    vet. what[/ Quote]
    After all tongue
  31. Alex NEWS
    Alex NEWS April 25 2018 01: 43
    0
    In 1950 Russia or rather the USSR did not have representatives in the hall. And on this, a decision was made without the USSR.
    In short, there is no right and no opportunity to deprive at least 1 permanent member of the security vote.
    there are no such options at all. And everything else is written for Ukrainians who, without having read, without understanding the essence, will carry another snowstorm.
  32. dedsupers
    dedsupers April 25 2018 05: 46
    0
    NATO supporters are completely deaf! Vladimir Putin asked everyone to hear his message! So no, they don’t hear! Zadornov was right "Well stupid!" God did not give them sanity, but this is their choice.
  33. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat April 25 2018 06: 41
    +2
    Do not be surprised - the historical "knowledge" of modern Westerners is not just depressing, but terribly depressing. Then somehow I got to the center of a little scandal in our office when, to the surprise of one of my colleagues, for some reason he came across churches in the Aleutians architecturally alien to Catholicism, Protestantism, etc., I replied that Alaska belonged to Russia and therefore there there are Orthodox churches. Honestly, I did not expect the reaction that followed, everyone began to laugh at me, like that you were talking a freak. And when I said that part of California, led by Fort Ross, was Russian, it was just that everyone began to ride with laughter. I was stunned by my word of honor, my calls to go to the Internet and check my words, provoked only new explosions of laughter — I found where to look for the truth — on the Internet. I’ve already started to get angry, well, I’m saying that you believe the Internet nasty things about Russia, but in this matter, you think the Internet is not objective. The answer is “nasty things” about present-day Russia, their official publications write and write, and everybody knows that Russia is a vile country and all world evil comes from there - the “evil empire”. These are they - “western inhabitants”, and the Russians are trying to “convey the truth” to them — to no avail.
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 April 25 2018 06: 46
      +1
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      and so they know that Russia is a vile country and all world evil comes from there- "evil empire."

      I can imagine what will happen if you tell them that the Hawaiian Islands tried to become part of the Russian Empire. crying
    2. g1washntwn
      g1washntwn April 25 2018 10: 42
      +1
      The brain of the average American
  34. Vard
    Vard April 25 2018 08: 07
    0
    The General Staff ... on the table, a map of the globe ... the military puts crosses in pencil ... The second looks ... and says ... and these abstained .. The first takes an eraser ... did they abstain?
  35. 75 hammer
    75 hammer April 25 2018 09: 08
    0
    Everything is very simple, the VETO right must be confirmed (by the state’s presence of power), otherwise it will be like 1950 in Korea, while the Americans were seriously planning to drop the atomic bomb and only the transfer of Soviet fighters thwarted their plans! And now who has the brains, throw this situation in 2018, and try to limit yourself only to the territory of Syria, it is unlikely to succeed! The Russian Federation is now in the status of a bear, which is being hunted down and taken for a shot, but the stupid hunter does not understand that the bear also has a gun, and it is not led to him, but he goes there himself! When international law does not work (1999), then the law of the strong works! It’s time for the darkest to recall the mobilization economy, otherwise they will hound!
    1. Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat April 25 2018 10: 23
      0
      The mobilization economy presupposes a complete restructuring of the state of both foreign and domestic policies and a change or partial restructuring of the governing apparatus. In addition, one of the priority actions during mobilization measures in the economy is the nationalization or introduction of state administration in key extractive, processing, production, transport and logistics areas, as well as partial "refinancing" of the oligarchy and confiscation measures of "surplus" finances from the population through forced loans , "freezing" deposits, etc. Do you seriously think that the existing government will be able, and most importantly, will want to do all this?
      1. 75 hammer
        75 hammer April 25 2018 10: 58
        0
        Do you seriously think that random people are in key places, including commercial structures? And nobody controls them? The longer you wear pink glasses, the better for us. I hope not disclosed to the state secret!
        1. Monster_Fat
          Monster_Fat April 25 2018 11: 15
          +1
          Yes Yes. "I believe, I believe every beast, and even more so ...." (on the avatar Mountain Lion). If in Russia, as you say, “key people, including commercial structures, are not random people”, then after the story with the “nonrandom” Deripaska and his “Fish”, I just don’t envy Russia .... As long as you have such a "non-random" rule, America can sleep peacefully ....
          1. 75 hammer
            75 hammer April 25 2018 11: 33
            0
            If judged by YOUR avatar ....., but do not judge, but you will not be judged! I have been reading comments from your nickname for a long time, and it seems to me that the collective of authors writes, judging by the morphology of your opuses. Why YOURS is a plural. And about Deripaska, YOUR current president is sleeping with prostitutes and porn actresses for money — an absolutely immoral type, and the “aluminum” was reprimanded, the next time a party card on the table! Goodbye America - where I will never, and for what reason I will not say!
            1. Monster_Fat
              Monster_Fat April 25 2018 11: 43
              0
              Well, I dare to assure you, I write myself. And I’ll hear about America coming soon “kirdyk” from about 1998. It’s not clear that I know how the American elite negotiated “resettlement” to Russia in the Altai region at the peak of future cataclysms and they just need Russia armed to the teeth to withstand the new “movement of peoples” during the global cataclysm, I read about it .. Only now .... while this is "conspiracy theories" and no more .... As well as the fact that the Americans poisoned all their drinking water with the production of shale oil and gas ....
              1. 75 hammer
                75 hammer April 25 2018 11: 51
                0
                You again incorrectly translated my words — I did not write about the “kirdyk” of the chosen nation (doesn’t it remind me of anything?), I wrote about the fact that “where I will never be!” And all of YOU listed, I finally can understand the matter, we solve our problems, do not interfere underfoot and you will be happy. Sit on the priest evenly, behind a large puddle and stop drinking blood from the rest of humanity (appeal not to the ordinary citizen, but to the policy of the SGA or FSA).
                1. Monster_Fat
                  Monster_Fat April 25 2018 12: 02
                  0
                  It will not work, alas .... Have you read the "doctrine of the United States"? For the first time, they have now recognized the economic interests of American companies as state-owned, and moreover, they have recognized as foreign interests any foreign events where US institutions and mechanisms created and controlled by the United States are involved, in other words, where there is a dollar and American companies and Americans work there, and US state interests. So, it turns out that the whole world they have declared the sphere of their state interests.
                  1. Golovan Jack
                    Golovan Jack April 25 2018 12: 05
                    +1
                    Quote: Monster_Fat
                    where there is a dollar and American companies and Americans work, there are US interests

                    Will break down. Or tear. This is not a single state in the world to raise request
                  2. 75 hammer
                    75 hammer April 25 2018 12: 22
                    0
                    It will come out, it will not work, I believe, I do not believe it! But your interests do not shake us, you will be able to confirm your strength, we will reckon with you, well, this is in the near future, and if you call you empty-handed, you will be treated accordingly, YOU are ours!
  36. Cynic
    Cynic April 25 2018 16: 52
    0
    Has the US ignored the UN Security Council more than once, say politely?
    What is stopping others?