In USC will finalize the project submarine "Husky"

April 24 2018 21

The preliminary design of the Husky multipurpose nuclear submarine will be finalized in accordance with the amendments of the naval specialists fleet RF, transmits TASS the message of the head of the USC Alexei Rakhmanov.

In USC will finalize the project submarine "Husky"

An advance project was developed, it went through the first discussion with our colleagues from the Navy, certain comments were made, now we will refine these comments,

said the head of the company.

Earlier in the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) reported that "the formation of the appearance and the creation of a preliminary design of the submarine" Husky "will be completed within two years."

The agency recalls that the development of a fifth-generation multipurpose submarine is being carried out at the Malakhit design bureau (St. Petersburg).

A series of fourth-generation submarines of the Yasen project and the Borey strategic rocket carriers are currently under construction in Russia.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Dead duck

+2

April 24 2018 13: 57

The project is certainly good ... only the president wanted to get involved in education, medicine and the social network, and funds will probably be cut off from the defense industry
1. Corsair0304
  
  +4
  
  April 24 2018 14: 04
  
  Quote: Deadush
  and funds will probably be cut off from the defense industry
  
  I don’t think so. Most likely reserves. Nobody will cut the defense now - until 2020, it is necessary to re-equip blood from the nose, in the world oh, how restless. And although I do not question the words of GDP about the availability of a new generation of weapons to us, the question remains of its saturation in the troops to the required number + reserve.
  1. Dead duck
    
    +7
    
    April 24 2018 14: 11
    
    Quote: Corsair0304
    Most likely reserves.
    
    Our reserves have long been full of holes ... unless the toast-soums are shocked
    1. Lock36
      
      0
      
      April 24 2018 14: 38
      
      It’s possible with you. By the way, who is this “you”?
      The Russian Federation has so far.
      1. Dead duck
        
        +4
        
        April 24 2018 14: 44
        
        Quote: Lock36
        It’s possible with you. By the way, who is this “you”?
        
        Tsar of all Russia!
        Contact if that
        Quote: Lock36
        Russia still has
        
        The Russian Federation always has it, do you know where and what it is (and in what quantity)?
  2. NEXUS
    
    +8
    
    April 24 2018 14: 31
    
    Quote: Corsair0304
    Most likely reserves. Nobody will cut the defense now - until 2020
    
    Right. But ... if not for our 30-year-old hibernation, we would already have a Husky series, about 10 years old. Our multi-purpose submarines are aging (I'm not talking about Yasen). Modernization of Pike will extend their life by another 10 years. Moreover, mattresses will not wait for us, and therefore, speaking of Husky, we must understand that this project for us now is akin to the construction of BAM or Baikonur.
    1. san4es
      
      +3
      
      April 24 2018 16: 25
      
      Quote: NEXUS
      ... this project is for us now, akin to the construction of BAM or Baikonur.
      
      ... and combined :
      ... The latest Husky nuclear submarine will be as unified as possible and incorporate the qualities of multi-purpose and strategic submarines. This was reported by TASS with reference to the president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation Alexei Rakhmanov.
      ... "This will be a boat that will be unified - strategic and multi-purpose in a number of its key elements," the news agency quoted the head of the corporation.
      ... Earlier, representatives of the United Shipbuilding Corporation reported that two versions of the Husky nuclear submarine would be created: a boat-hunter for enemy submarines and a boat-carrier of anti-ship cruise missiles. Both submarines are designed as part of a single base platform, the main difference is the insertion into the hull of the carrier boat of cruise missiles of the missile compartment.
      ... It should be noted that the main feature of the fifth generation nuclear submarines will be the use of the latest composite materials instead of rubber coatings, which will significantly reduce the noise level, ...
      
      https://defence.ru/article/9148/
2. Bronevick
  
  +2
  
  April 24 2018 14: 34
  
  After all, they said that this is a fake about social programs, medicine.
Vita vko

0

April 24 2018 14: 13

Judging by the time of the formation of the appearance of a promising project, the new nuclear submarine will be universal, large series and highly efficient. A fairly practical approach. It is not in vain that the Americans are in such a hurry to weaken Russia and unleash a regional war, they understand that in 5-10 years even such a ghostly chance will not exist.
1. Blackbeard
  
  0
  
  April 24 2018 14: 25
  
  let's hope that a big series
2. donavi49
  
  0
  
  April 24 2018 14: 36
  
  Well so we follow the hegemon.
  
  They also in addition to the serial and good Elk (Shchuki-B) - made the prodigy SiVulf (Ash / Ash). The price tag, complexity and high cost of operation are off scale. Then they rethought everything and released a normal boat, serial, at an affordable price, complexity - Virginia, and then making it truly universal (bringing the opportunities for Toothy Elks to democratize countries, and also make a new SSBN on the basis of Virginia).
  1. ZVO
    
    +2
    
    April 24 2018 20: 31
    
    Quote: donavi49
    and also on the base of Virginia make a new SSBN).
    
    Why is this such an exhaust of thought?
    Colombia generally doesn’t stand by its side to Virginia ...
3. Boa kaa
  
  +2
  
  April 24 2018 23: 22
  
  Quote: Vita VKO
  the new submarine will be universal, large series and highly efficient.
  
  Hello Slavs!
  1. Universal? in armament? on components? by the nature of the tasks to be solved? - what do scribblers put into this concept? I would like to decrypt at least a hint ...
  2. Big series .... Is it a lope in grams? 30 buildings yes for 5 years, it turns out a century and a half ... At our pace of creation ....
  3. Highly effective ... How is it? for what tasks? And what weapons will be required for this ...
  So it turns out that our commentators are entirely dreamers-dreamers with common places, instead of specific standards .. Anyhow blurt out that thread!
  (One would like to say: “Boring, girls!” - from an interview with VV Putin to an American journalist. (C))
Ingvar0401

+1

April 24 2018 14: 15

Quote: Corsair0304
Quote: Deadush
and funds will probably be cut off from the defense industry

I don’t think so. Most likely reserves. Nobody will cut the defense now - until 2020, it is necessary to re-equip blood from the nose, in the world oh, how restless. And although I do not question the words of GDP about the availability of a new generation of weapons to us, the question remains of its saturation in the troops to the required number + reserve.

It is necessary to rearm. Only until 2020, only a preliminary design and appear, as can be seen from the statement. You won’t win much with a sketch ...
Aleks2048

0

April 24 2018 14: 28

On the one hand, the project is already good ... On the other hand, if you do not increase the pace, the question of the need for modernization and repair of what is and is also a cost will become acute. In this scenario, the money may not be enough for everything and they will begin to cut the program for the release of a new one, postponing the time for commissioning.
1. Chichikov
  
  +1
  
  April 24 2018 14: 50
  
  Everything will depend on the assessment of the General Staff of the Armed Forces and the Security Council of the Russian Federation of current and future threats to security! The slogan, “Everything for the front, everything for victory” and the organizational and mobilization measures held for it, will never, no one cancel by any Law. This is the prerogative of the Commander-in-Chief! It should be understood that in the event of real threats, all "peaceful" institutions of power, administration and other state add-ons will, in fact and forcibly, modify their functions and powers, without any reference to democracy. All these Chambers, Councils, deputies, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and so on, will be pushed into the "sump", until better times!
  1. Aleks2048
    
    +1
    
    April 24 2018 18: 33
    
    I'm afraid that this approach is utopian. And it will be just a super gift to the enemy in the event described by a situation such as an enemy at the gate! Not the best time to carry out economic reforms. Moreover, it will not give anything. The production of high-tech weapons requires time, a lot of time, and even if you put it into a round-the-clock mode of operation, then in a situation the enemy does not have time to build anything at the gates.
bald

+2

April 24 2018 15: 00

I think the reserves (as they say here) have nothing to do with it. It is more expedient to complete the started "Ash", "Borey", and along the way to modify the "Husky".
Old26

+2

April 24 2018 15: 37

Quote: Corsair0304
I don’t think so. Most likely reserves. Nobody will cut the defense now - until 2020

Oh really? The Ministry of Defense for 2018 requested 55 trillion rubles. Dali 17-19. This means "will not be cut" ??
Due to the lack of funds for the KhZ, for how long (the end of the ten-year armament program, and this is 2026, the EMNIP) projects such as Barguzin and Rubezh were postponed. And that's not all. I think that both an underwater drone and a nuclear-powered propulsion system and much more will fall into these programs.
GRIGORIY76

0

April 24 2018 16: 42

Why is it impossible in the next 20 years to build only ash trees, gradually improving them, will it also be cheaper? Why do ships always go in small series, because the budget is limited.?
1. ZVO
  
  0
  
  April 24 2018 20: 33
  
  Quote: GRIGORIY76
  Why is it impossible in the next 20 years to build only ash trees, gradually improving them, will it also be cheaper? Why do ships always go in small series, because the budget is limited.?
  
  Answering honestly this question - you will deprive many billions of uncontrollably spent state funds by all sorts of top leaders of our design bureaus ...