Military Review

Degeneration of consciousness? Reflections on a given topic

44
For many years I have been writing and publishing articles on a variety of topics in print and online resources and cannot complain about the inattention of readers. But only article "Degeneration of consciousness?" today can be considered a record holder of my career in the journalistic field. None of my publications have had such a massive response and number of reposts! Thanks to everyone, both friends and opponents, for their interest and indifference! You all give me a lot of impressions and information for consideration. It is a pity that sociologists did not engage in the development of methods for the study of public opinion on the basis of the analysis of reactions to various topics by Internet users. I believe that such an analysis would be much more efficient and reliable than the traditional surveys they used to do.




I can not help but notice that once again opponents have caused bewilderment and surprise. On several resources I flew from them accusing that I keep silent about the unique experience of reducing the number of criminal murders that exists and works effectively in Japan. And among the reproaches, I noticed a few nicknames who actively participated in the discussion of my recent article “Civil shortbridge and Japan”where I am discussing this “phenomenon” in detail, expressing my aversion and aversion to the practice of state cooperation and organized crime that has existed in Japan for centuries.

But in this publication, I myself intend to comment on the articles that I recently stumbled upon on the web, because they very precisely resonated with the thoughts that arise from my observations of modern life.

The first article belongs to the Russian author and is called “Who needs large-scale executions in the USA, or Why do maniacs exterminate Americans with such success?”. The meaning of this publication, as I understood it, is that, according to the author, all the American psychopathic shootings of recent years occur and are widely distributed with a rather subtle, but obvious connivance of the ruling financial and political elite of the United States in order to completely compromise its eyes constitutional right to own personal weapons, self-defense with its help, as well as the ability to create armed volunteer formations to resist state power, if it turns into lawless tyranny.

The author draws attention to the fact that the American police could easily have prevented all the high-profile executions of the last time, because each time it later turned out that she knew about all psychopaths in advance and even received signals about the preparation of executions literally just before they began. And in Florida, armed police did not enter the school at all, but simply waited for the arrival of the police special forces. While waiting, the psychopath killed his victims without interference. However, my hand in these policemen will not throw a stone, because they have been entangled with such a web of all sorts of “human rights” laws and instructions, that in these legal traps the devil breaks his leg, and for his own dedication in such situations, policemen can be deprived of Carry on the courts until the criminal punishment. We have a similar thing in Russia too ... How many times have people in the media been telling how the police responded to calls for help in the spirit that when they were crippled or killed, then contact us. The author concludes in his article that the upper ruling stratum of America is simply preparing its people for a sharp decline in their living standards, so to speak, dispossession, and before that wants to deprive them of their will and possibilities for effective resistance. Here and the rod in America executions for executions, purchased media sow panic and hysterics, all kinds of committees and movements to hold protest actions are created, which immediately receive outright excessive financial support just to fool as many people as possible with the requirements to prohibit possession of civilian weapons. They act in a big way, using high psychological and even variety technologies. Here's an example: when President Trump offered to allow volunteer teachers to have personal weapons in schools, they immediately tried to ridicule him with Hochma: and if the next school firing squad staged a kooky teacher, then you need to arm the students? And it was no longer possible to perceive quite logical objections to the risen goggle that the teacher who was gone astray would easily be stopped by his normal teacher. Or what prevents the kooky teachers from shooting schools now that even the guards are unarmed in them? And if all legal weapons are forbidden, then the bandits and maniacs will simply acquire them illegally, nothing will change, it may even get worse.

Well, at present, America is in debt like silk, and these debts are only growing, despite all the indisputable achievements of the United States in the field of economics and science. With the highest level of economic management and labor productivity, this country does not pay for itself, and this happens also because there are huge unproductive expenditures on maintaining a high standard of living for the majority of the population. What are the benefits alone, allowing a huge number of families not to work at all for several generations. So, the “upper comrades” have to think about when the whole bubble will burst, and so that the impoverished people would immediately have neither the will nor the ability to punish their own businessmen by armed means. So the author, in my opinion, logically connected everything in his assumptions. And how surprisingly the article of the American author echoes his publication: "We were deceived by the black woman, and now the 17-year-old boy". In his discourse, the American does not reflect on who benefits from the disarmament of his compatriots for financial and political reasons. But he, by his own common sense and on the basis of indisputable facts, sees how civilian weapons work to save lives and protect the personal dignity of their owners. How arrogantly, hysterically and falsely they try to slander this benefit to those who have been brainwashed by the degeneracy and invested in them the degenerate psychology of total defeatism. He calls these people the liberal leftists. He also gives examples of how they consistently, persistently, persistently and skillfully apply the technologies of psychological persuasion in order to incline the masses, as it were, to voluntary consent to perversely absurd things that are incompatible with a healthy outlook. He cites one example of how for decades, through the preaching of tolerance and its upbringing from school, the LGBT community has achieved for itself a privileged position on almost all levels of social life. From myself I can add that the forms of behavior of LGBT people are completely incompatible with the military spirit, for they are distinguished by psychological instability and a tendency towards hysteria and depression. That is why these individuals in our country (and earlier they tried everywhere) are trying not to take into the army and the police. In our military registration and enlistment offices, they are simply diagnosed with a personality disorder on the basis of sexual desire and sent home. But when LGBT people are legal, open and perceived as normal in the mass public consciousness, they can instill their own behavior in young people, including fruitful opponents of civilian weapons, who are ready not to reckon with any, even obvious, arguments that contradict their position. This is why they (LGBT!) Are beneficial to the rulers who are striving to disarm their citizens.

I thought to myself with a smile: if you put together these authors, ours and the American, to talk about this topic, they will easily find a common language. And as they begin to disassemble the current relations between Russia and America, they will most likely fall to pieces and fight for blood, both fighters are natural by nature ...

There is another interesting article about how England gradually went and what kind of insanity came in the way of arms bans: "The ban on self-defense in Britain", but I will not comment on it. And in general, I would like to know as widely as possible the opinion of those who want to read this material, think over it with me on the principle: one head is good, and the collective mind is smarter. So I wait for responses.

PS I am compelled to note that among the commentators of my articles on various resources appeared stable groups of those who excel in relation to me and my like-minded people in primitive and often obscene attacks, trying to provoke violent arguments with the transition to personalities. Well, and among us, for a long time and not without success, degenerate technology works ...
Author:
Articles from this series:
Degeneration of consciousness?
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mordvin 3
    Mordvin 3 April 23 2018 05: 34
    +1
    And, again, it’s kind of about the legalization of the short barrel. recourse I personally drum. wink
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich April 23 2018 05: 44
      +10
      Quote: mordvin xnumx
      I personally drum. wink
      that is, do you have a revolver? smile
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 April 23 2018 05: 49
        +2
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        that is, you have a revolver

        No, I'm in the sense that I do not care if there will be legalization or not. I don’t care, in short. So write it down. laughing
        1. tracer
          tracer April 23 2018 06: 25
          +9
          "The revolvers themselves will be found." About the introduction of a short barrel. "I am a supporter of permission under the law." However ... Somehow I was talking in the company with one lady. A normal woman is like two little daughters. But she is very, very afraid of being alone at home and therefore she needs a "gun". When her husband blurted out her saying “buy” he took him aside and told him that (most likely) he or their cat (very large) would be the first ones whom she would “fill up” out of this very gun that he would “buy her” from fear. Since then, her husband simply "pacifist" about the cat can not say anything, but probably he, no worse than before, works in large caliber in slippers ...
      2. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 April 23 2018 06: 19
        +2
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        that is, do you have a revolver?

        I know who has parabellum! laughing
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich April 23 2018 06: 52
          +3
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          that is, do you have a revolver?

          I know who has parabellum! laughing

          shhh! to nobody ...! (I'll go hide ...) smile
          1. BZTM
            BZTM April 23 2018 09: 21
            +13
            And I agree with the author. Do not let people arm themselves with the policies of those authorities that are afraid of their own people, more than an external enemy, because we cannot legally buy a short-barrel, and the Russian Guard will soon become a larger army.
            1. Squelcher
              Squelcher April 23 2018 09: 52
              +5
              And what can you do with a short barrel against an external enemy?
              I can not understand the short-fetish fetish of some kind of not stupid people.
              They ran into a short barrel, and the law on self-defense prohibiting the defense at point blank did not notice.
            2. rotmistr60
              rotmistr60 April 23 2018 10: 45
              +5
              BZTM
              Prevent people from arming themselves with the policies of those authorities that fear their own people more than an external enemy
              Complete, and unreasonable stupidity. Do you miss traumatism? Go to the army there every day you will feel weapons.
              Author: Michael Goldreer
              No comments, as several years the same thing.
            3. Begemot
              Begemot April 23 2018 11: 19
              +9
              And where do you go with your pistols to fight? How much can I write paid articles on the legalization of the short barrel? The state is not afraid of you. I have 5 trunks, starting with SVD and easier. Officially, civilian, and can be worn and stored. No one is afraid that I will be offended by the state and start firing left to right. Because there is a clear application: hunting and shooting range, everything else is crime. And the short barrel is uncontrollable. How then to prove the legitimacy of the application, if the participant in the conflict died, take a word to the shooter ?? so your way, or prohibit shooting without outside observers. What kind of nonsense are you ready to go in the desire to realize your unbridled ambitions of "supermen with a Colt" and equally large-scale fears, to trembling knees, being unarmed. What bestial passions must be mastered in order to so passionately strive to be ready to shoot people. When you shoot a beast, until the last second you verify whether it is possible to get this individual, whether another beast will fall under the shot, if you can shoot in the place so as not to make a wounded animal and sometimes you have to refuse, because there is no certainty. And here, the owner of the short barrels instantly decides who he will shoot at, and in the heat of passion, it will seem to him that everyone around him, and he won’t choose time, will start firing indiscriminately, without looking at those standing behind, at random passersby. What nonsense !? Or in their fantasies apologists for legalization have long been Rambo or tough nuts? So I’ll tell you a secret, these are fairy tales.
            4. icant007
              icant007 April 23 2018 14: 07
              +4
              And rightly so that you can’t buy. Look at how much shooting on the streets became when injuries entered the mass traffic. They began to shoot at once, like cowboys. We have not gotten off the palm tree in this matter.
              Or remember a couple of schoolchildren who kept the defense in their house from the police, and then shot themselves. And what was the background?
              In every sense - the papkin flag of the airborne forces behind on the wall "Proud of service in the airborne forces!" or "No one but us." I don’t remember exactly.
              So the former paratrooper gathered up an arsenal at home on his head and his child.
              1. RaptorF22
                RaptorF22 April 27 2018 09: 36
                +1
                Well, the horrors began, how scary to live, look at America lol
                1. icant007
                  icant007 April 27 2018 10: 36
                  +1
                  Do not live scared. It’s scary to die by stupidity.
            5. RaptorF22
              RaptorF22 April 26 2018 14: 13
              +1
              I agree even nothing to add hi
  2. kakvastam
    kakvastam April 23 2018 12: 31
    +5
    The trouble with the legal short-barrels is that people who are incapable of controlled violence tend to acquire them: being unarmed, they swallow any insult, and having a barrel in their pocket - at least lethal, at least traumatic - they can shoot with fear in a situation where it would be enough to swindle. ..

    It is known that repressed individuals often seek opportunities to revenge with impunity the world that offended them, and it is hardly worth helping them with this.
    1. 23rus
      23rus April 23 2018 14: 43
      +3
      This is true. A normal person will not buy a short-barrel, but will buy a psycho or with garters in the prosecutor's office.
      1. RaptorF22
        RaptorF22 April 26 2018 14: 20
        +1
        Strange logic request Normal man cs won't buy winked why then do people get rifled carbines with a range of 1 km? Or a 12 gauge shotgun? Or a jeep with 200 horses under the hood? Although the car is even more dangerous, first of all, because it can be stolen and knocked down by people like skittles?
    2. RaptorF22
      RaptorF22 April 26 2018 14: 15
      +1
      If you mean all kinds of freaks, then they just do not need a cop, what prevents them from knocking you down with a car, beating them with a sledgehammer, poking with a knife or poking with an ax which are not prohibited by the way?
  3. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 April 23 2018 12: 59
    +7
    I am sure that the authorities have already fully realized the current situation. The matter is not in the trunk itself, but in the approach to the relationship between the individual and the authorities. Yes, our country needs the broadest and most profound uplift of military spirit. Yes, it should be immediately (actually it was necessary yesterday, and preferably five years ago) to use military training, and weapons, and specific supplies, and ... and ... A lot of things are needed.
    But the people! Armed people maintain their power FREE. As befits free people who defend theirs. As it was in the 30 years of that century, when anyone who wanted was armed. Yes, the law enforcement agencies then thought very little about bribes and the construction of red roofs, but a lot about their work, but did we resist then? Yes, here they are. Armed people. Free. Soviet power was their power. Which they supported with their trunks.
    But what about now? No, how to be that ?! We need a strong, belligerent people, ready to fight back enemies. There will not be enough army in a modern war for a week, and blows will most likely be from the inside. But the power itself ... Is that our power? Yes? Right? Here it is. So the question is not at all about revolvers.
    Yes, the authors of the comments on the topic “We cannot give trunks to our people” and “whom you intend to shoot.” People ... Have you tried to restrain your cowardice like that? Maybe you are not so vile creatures that people dream of killing you? BUT? Maybe not all? And, I hope that you yourself are able to restrain yourself. Well, if not - do not buy the trunk, and that’s it.
    1. kakvastam
      kakvastam April 23 2018 15: 18
      +4
      Korotkostvol for the defense of the country (as well as for confronting overwhelming power) is not needed from the word at all, here rifled and smooth-bore rifles and carbines, which are fully authorized and now semi-automatic, are much more appropriate.

      If you want to develop military skills, create an army reserve with regular training (if it’s from above), self-defense units, whatever you call them (if from below), and go ahead, moreover, within the framework of the law and without any overthrow.

      And the trunk in the pocket of a cowardly nerd, believe me, is not about that at all.
      1. Mikhail3
        Mikhail3 April 23 2018 17: 31
        +7
        Well, damn it! How is that? That's why such a clear question is so hard to explain to normal people, huh? Let's try on an example. Why is a specialist in a long and painfully trained melee? Well they do not use it almost? They have weapons, all, many, without weapons they will not fulfill their task for anything ... why did the instructors shake them like a bulb for years? What for?
        Yes, then, that melee is the only and unique way to raise a fighter so that his training is not accompanied by a shaft of corpses. We won’t talk about the culture of movement, health and other things, the main goal is to turn a person into a fighter.
        With weapons, the question is the other side of the coin - the unarmed cannot be free. In principle, it cannot, because freedom is when you defend yours. Unarmed can not, in principle, is not able to protect anything, he has nothing, maximum - he can die for his own. The education of a fighter, a warrior, does not begin.
        What does the skill have to do with it? Skills are nonsense. And skills, and military equipment, and tactics, and supply ... all this is important. But do you know when victory is decided? It is, in fact, very simple. That is dead, and we must jump out of the trench. And before a person a choice. Where to jump out? Run forward on the enemy, dreaming only to reach him at last, or back? As most people make this choice, the war will be resolved. Since death lies ahead, the "sergeant's stick" no longer solves anything.
        Understand that a person without freedom in the spirit cannot go forward. Well, that is, you can push him with all sorts of tricks, from time to time even win ... only a serious war can not be won. All these numbers are very short-lived in the face of a terrible war death. The Russians have always won. Earlier. While they were armed. For a long time the USSR supported the conviction that the weapon is still in your hand, despite the fact that it is not at home. Military training without fools, fees, but the main thing is a firm belief that "our armor is strong and our tanks are fast," that is, there is a skill, but you will get weapons instantly and you will go to fight for yours, for OURS. And now there is none of ours at all. And the first is not ours - it is a government that is afraid of us until the screech of a pig ...
        1. kakvastam
          kakvastam April 23 2018 18: 20
          +3
          All true.
          Only with the short-barreled is in no way connected, rather, with questions of initial military training. Too many had to see people who were blown away by the illusion of superiority, although in ordinary life they are afraid to say the word.
          1. Mikhail3
            Mikhail3 April 24 2018 08: 33
            +4
            It is connected, and directly, inextricably. FREE gun ownership. Weapons for the free. Or not. You can’t be partially pregnant ...
            1. kakvastam
              kakvastam April 25 2018 12: 18
              +3
              So after all, weapons that are really effective in terms of defense can be acquired quite easily, and a fart, from which the majority will not fall into the growth target, is rather a psychological compensation for personal insecurity.
              1. Mikhail3
                Mikhail3 April 25 2018 14: 35
                +3
                What is it, sorry? What is this really needed self-defense weapon that is not a barrel? Different spray cans are not weapons at all, rubber arrows are just a replacement for a strong, trained fist, with a hunting rifle around the city it is a little strange to wander around ... What are you talking about?
                And countless times - the matter is in caliber. Pukalka there, spitting or howitzer. And if you need "compensation for personal uncertainty", then free people will simply shoot you in the end, because of the idiotic brandishing of the barrel.
                They will shoot, yes. Freedom is dangerous. It’s scary to be free, it’s scary to live in a world of free. I understand very much those who are cowards and from that hoplofobstva. That's just slaves do not defend their states, their land, their families. Though there were mamelukes ...
                1. kakvastam
                  kakvastam 3 May 2018 14: 10
                  +1
                  A hunting rifle to protect the house is much more effective, especially a rifled semiautomatic device. It is completely accessible to all comers, it is not at all Newton’s bin to hand over the hunt.

                  But the need to carry the barrel everywhere gives some infantilism.
    2. RaptorF22
      RaptorF22 April 26 2018 14: 23
      +2
      Here I am about the same hi If they have such a pathological fear of weapons or religion and beliefs do not allow do not acquire and that's it wink
    3. icant007
      icant007 April 27 2018 18: 12
      0
      Quote: Mikhail3
      As befits free people who defend theirs.

      Youthful maximalism. When I was 15-20 years old, I reasoned the same way.
      Take motorcyclists for example. In Rostov-on-Don, a couple of years ago, there were a lot of biker deaths. Whatever night is death, nor night is death. And everywhere in the comments - oh, what a good person they lost.
      Time has passed. Apparently everyone who could break broke. Now there are few cases.
      The same will happen with the short barrel. The injuries have not yet perished themselves. Let this layer be cleansed, then you can watch.
      In Russia, a lot of offended people.
      1. Mikhail3
        Mikhail3 April 27 2018 21: 43
        +2
        Tired cynicism implies a soft chair, a glass and a cozy twilight. But you see, so that all this does not get ripped off by the blast wave, and does not dip the stinking dirt into the dirt with the breadbox, one has to fight from time to time. You know, regularly, like brushing your teeth. The nuclear weapons have postponed the deadline, but look - the soft-headed generation has grown up and is not afraid of nuclear weapons either! That's about to smell.
        And in war, for victory, thoughtful cynicism is not required. We must return to maximalism, because to lay our belly for our own, for our homeland, children and the future is a very, very maximalist act. Extremely. Since this is required of everyone, I recommend recalling your 20. Well, or examine the nearest wall. Far away they will not lead, there will be no time ...
        I don't care how many offended people turn out to be unstable. there will be a thousand times less of them than you think / oh, this sticky whisper of cowardice in a contracting consciousness ... / but they will, of course. Do you think it is better to die like heifers in a slaughterhouse - without thinking of resistance, and only quietly mooing? Stalin was Vsevobuch, and Stalin won. And we only have a cowardly mumble about "as if chago did not work out." We will win with him, right?
        1. icant007
          icant007 April 27 2018 22: 00
          0
          Did you fight
  4. Whowhy
    Whowhy April 23 2018 14: 41
    +2
    I was in Washington in 1995 (on a business trip at DEA). There for a year, with 700 thousand people, 200 gunshots, with a fatal one. There they drove us to the local memorial, who died while being executed by the police. I don’t remember exactly how many are buried there, but then I was impressed by the size ....
    Personally, this was enough for me to become a categorical opponent of the legalization of the civilian short-barrel in Russia.
    1. trak
      April 23 2018 14: 58
      +6
      Tell me, did not you forget to mention to you in this excursion that just in the territory of Washington a civilian short-bar is prohibited, as well as in Russia? And that in the territories of Texas and especially Alaska, where weapons are sold as bread at all, such memorials do not smell. I suggest you understand the topic deeper. And then we received greetings from degeneration and now live with him.
      1. Whowhy
        Whowhy April 23 2018 15: 05
        +1
        And who told you this - about the prohibition? For example, I was there in the supermarket, in the arms department (yes, next to umbrellas and fashionable T-shirts lol ) - there you can buy a pistol simply by a driver's license, and only then go and register with the police .... The short-bar assortment there was more than what I could even imagine at that time.
        And that in the territories of Texas and especially Alaska, where weapons are sold as bread at all, such memorials do not smell.

        Yeah, in Russia, too, "and it doesn't smell" - and what does that prove ???
        By the way (well, just as an interesting fact), the injuries and gas pistols were, indeed, prohibited by law - we specifically found out, since we only started to appear then ...
      2. tracer
        tracer April 23 2018 16: 50
        +5
        I support. Many times I was in Texas and indeed in all states .. In the states with the most liberalism, the arms laws of firearms are orders of magnitude smaller. As well as the mob mob. In North Carolina, someone with a friend shot at the banks in the backyard of a house outside the city ... and nothing .. everything is within the law. To my question, how does he carry his Glock in the glove compartment of Silverado, he replied that he was always with a loaded store. The license is next to the rights and that’s it. . And nothing ... the statistics of gunshots is minimal. Now I’ll express the muck. The bulk of the robbers is a declassified element of blacks and Mexicans. There are very few whites there. But they were shaking by their nature and are afraid to get a bullet in the forehead, so they do not attack. And who really wants to, he attacks and gets a bullet ... And he no longer attacks.
    2. RaptorF22
      RaptorF22 April 26 2018 14: 34
      +1
      And if we had a memorial to fallen citizens who hoped that they would be protected by those who should do this, would you also become a categorical adversary of the short-barrel in Russia? Or do you only have police officers? What are these double standards? am! !! I personally know many people who were clogged in their own house, strangled, brutally murdered, so they buried in closed coffins am If we had adequate legislation and allowed ks, then these deaths could be a priori avoided No.
  5. Sam_gosling
    Sam_gosling April 23 2018 17: 47
    0
    Eka the author of his haters foresaw. He seems to suspect that he is writing quite "deep thoughts".
  6. trak
    April 23 2018 18: 03
    +3
    Quote: whowhy
    And who told you this - about the prohibition? For example, I was there in the supermarket, in the arms department (yes, next to umbrellas and fashionable T-shirts lol ) - there you can buy a pistol simply by a driver's license, and only then go and register with the police .... The short-bar assortment there was more than what I could even imagine at that time.
    And that in the territories of Texas and especially Alaska, where weapons are sold as bread at all, such memorials do not smell.

    Yeah, in Russia, too, "and it doesn't smell" - and what does that prove ???
    By the way (well, just as an interesting fact), the injuries and gas pistols were, indeed, prohibited by law - we specifically found out, since we only started to appear then ...


    About the prohibition I was "told" by the laws of Washington, in the shops you really saw the assortment that you can buy, but according to local laws you cannot wear and use for self-defense, only for the collection and for the sport, which provokes criminals. There are really no memorials in Russia, but there are probably no fewer corpses from an illegal, specifically illegal firearm, than in America, but in general we have more criminal murders than there. So all this proves the benefit of a civilian shortbridge. And injuries are more dangerous and more harmful than a normal firearm, but not for criminals. This article is written. You want to be against the short-barrels - your business, but at least do it with open eyes and not be sly with other people.
  7. 82т11
    82т11 April 23 2018 21: 42
    +2
    I will give two examples for reflection
    1. One acquaintance walked through the park, sees the gopniks (I don’t remember 4 or 5 anymore), they harassed the girl and dragged him somewhere. Something was not observed near the police, but he had an injury with him. After a brief showdown, the gopniks were dumped. Familiar normal build is not an athlete even once.
    2. Another familiar athlete walks into a rocking chair, some kind of melee was fond of. I went out in the evening to the store for a loaf of bread in the next entrance. I ran into 5 in my opinion gopnik, they knocked him in a crowd. He says he was lucky that he managed to close it, otherwise he could become an invalid. And so he got off for a month in the hospital.

    So it turns out that often life puts you before the choice to pass by a person who needs help or take a chance and help. The lack of a short barrel pushes people to the first option, in the hope that the police will come and help.

    But the short barrel is also not a panacea; if it is introduced, strict rules of conduct must be introduced, up to the installation of a GPS beacon in it, which should signal the place and time of firing from a weapon.
    If a person wants to have a weapon, he must be prepared to limit his freedom.
  8. Whowhy
    Whowhy April 26 2018 08: 44
    +1
    Do you guys play childhood in some places until now. I worked as a criminalist for 20 years in the police, and I can also give you a bunch of different cases, for example, how these “short barrels” were taken from the owners and thrust them into .... (you know where), completely uncomplicated people suffered from gunfights on the street people (including children) etc .....
    All these stories about the fact that where weapons are allowed, street crime is much less there - it is either a juggling of facts or a primitive thinking, like, "the wind blows from the fact that the trees are swinging." Difficult questions must always be approached systematically and carefully analyze many factors, and not pull one of the general context.
    1. RaptorF22
      RaptorF22 April 26 2018 14: 45
      0
      Childhood? This is how you evaluate when a pensioner's grandfather is savagely beaten, broken ribs, beaten up with a chair so that the chair breaks and then is beaten with a leg from the chair on the head, and as a result they write in conclusion death from a cardiac arrest? Say, he himself rolled on the floor, and where did she get the prints of berets on her chest? Do you have any conscience ?? People in our country die a painful death and he writes childhood !!! What can an elderly man against a bunch of brutal teenagers? Absolutely nothing, but if he had a short barrel or at least a good semiautomatic device, a shotgun would not be unhappy for the unfortunate fool
  9. trak
    April 26 2018 15: 11
    +2
    Quote: whowhy
    Do you guys play childhood in some places until now. I worked as a criminalist for 20 years in the police, and I can also give you a bunch of different cases, for example, how these “short barrels” were taken from the owners and thrust them into .... (you know where), completely uncomplicated people suffered from gunfights on the street people (including children) etc .....
    All these stories about the fact that where weapons are allowed, street crime is much less there - it is either a juggling of facts or a primitive thinking, like, "the wind blows from the fact that the trees are swinging." Difficult questions must always be approached systematically and carefully analyze many factors, and not pull one of the general context.

    And you, tovarisch, would bring your facts, but the documentary, and then personally I have more doubts about your heroic and forensic past, but for me I have a childish approach to your side. Something where citizens can act with a personal shortbore, street crime still falls, and even quite, this is a bunch of documentary evidence, you can dig them yourself. So let's give your facts, and everyone can shout in the language, and under authority one can mow anyone too.
    1. RaptorF22
      RaptorF22 April 27 2018 09: 43
      0
      Agree hi such persons have people who they only consider am The life of our man for such a penny am They have a view of people as our government has everything else as a law am
  10. Catfish
    Catfish April 29 2018 02: 45
    +2
    I had one case in before the army youth. Together with a friend we went in the spring under Maloyaroslavets to relax in nature and fish. Well, about an hour we stomped from the train to a small forest river, put up a tent. A friend began to rake the bonfire, and I went to cut the lapnik into a litter. Well, I'm doing my job - suddenly a shot. He looked around: about five guys in quilted jackets, one in the hands of a gun. I also noticed that the butt is some kind of home-made. I turned and went to the fire. Shot again. Goggle and swearing, such as where he went so-and-so. I sat on a raincoat near a fire, and my friend, Sergei, tensed and did not let the ax out of his hands. And the crowd of local guys with a hoot and obscenities falls out of the bushes to us. Then I threw back the canopy of the raincoat next to me and the French RSC carbine under 22LR appeared for all to see, the shutter was open and the cartridge on the feed was clearly visible. We did not see these "eagles" anymore. What do you think, how would it end if I did not have my father’s carbine?
    Small-caliber, this is certainly not a short trunk, but the meaning of the story told here, I hope, is clear to everyone. hi
  11. Loki_2
    Loki_2 13 May 2018 15: 52
    0
    Michael, for people like you:
    https://topwar.ru/141257-strelba-v-uchebnom-zaved
    enii-novosibirskoy-oblasti-est-zhertvy.html