"Bird Ruh" unknown destination

The Stratolaunch system that currently exists for private money in the early 90s of the last century was conceptually described by a group of engineers at the Flight Research Center named after Dryden commissioned by NASA. The air launch was studied in connection with its all-azimuthality, that is, the possibility of launching in any direction. The classic launch of a rocket from ground-based cosmodromes requires spatial maneuvers that use a large part of the fuel stock. A carrier aircraft can easily and naturally change course, go to the most profitable equatorial courses, and take satellites (including dual-use ones) into a geostationary orbit. It is also important to remember about the so-called exclusion zone, which must necessarily be present near the cosmodromes - debris of accelerating rocket stages fall on its territory. The format of such zones can reach several thousand square kilometers with a serious restriction on any economic activity in their areas.


"Bird Ruh" unknown destination

Bert Rutan. Source: popmech.ru

As always, in stories nontrivial ideas is an active person, put a lot of strength to make it reality. Such for the project Stratolaunch was aircraft designer Bert Rutan, who proposed to abandon the flawed, in his opinion, idea to remake the existing flying "super-weights" for an air launch. And there were a lot of projects - An-225 with a maximum take-off mass of 640 tons offered to equip 250-ton rocket, which, in turn, delivered to orbit no more than 12 tons of payload. But commercial calculations have shown that it is necessary to throw at least 20-25 tons of net weight into orbit for payback, and in this case the weight of the aircraft carrier will exceed 1000 tons. And everything would be fine - there are no theoretical difficulties for assembling such a machine, but where will such a giant sit down? Creating one or two aerodrome for aircraft of this class actually devalues ​​all the economic bonuses of the air launch. Rutan also proposed the Grasshopper Grasshopper subsonic carrier aircraft project, which became the prototype embodied in steel and composites, Scaled Composites Model 351 Roc. The car was a two-body with four-bearing chassis and was intended to launch the launch vehicle from heights exceeding 12 km. To some extent, the developments were realized in the tourist suborbital station SpaceShipTwo. In 2010, the financial potential of investor Paul Allen, who created the project Stratolaunch Systems, joined the talent of Bert Rutan. The guys were familiar before that - the SpaceShipOne rocket glider, capable of climbing 100 km and more, their hands. Developed a six-engine miracle invited top-level specialists - engineers of the project Space Shuttle, as well as pilots reconnaissance and, in combination, the fastest aircraft SR-71. During the year, we managed to create a triune project - a flying launch platform, a middle class launch vehicle and ground infrastructure, that is, GDP, a hangar, and so on. The most interesting thing is that the ideological generator Bert Rutan stopped practicing his brainchild from April 2011, when he left his company Scaled Composites, which designed the Ruh Bird.


Scaled Composites Model 351 Roc ("Bird Rukh") on the taxiing. Source: spacenews.com

Initially, the “bird” was supposed to weigh about 544 tons, but in the process of development and assembly, this value increased to 590. Omnipresent Ilon Musk, without whom, it seems, not a single world hi-tech-kipish passes, oversaw the development of a launch vehicle based on his own Falcon 9. The Falcon 9 launch mass passed over 400 tons, the projected aircraft was not able to tear it off the ground, therefore the “nine” was cut to the Shorty version “shorty”. The rocket was smaller, lighter (up to 250 tons) and had to fit in the intersecting space of the Scaled Composites Model 351. The project assumed the launch of tons of payload into orbit as much as 6,12, which even then raised questions about the appropriateness of this undertaking. But the work was going on - the organizers rented an 8,1 ha area in the California Mojave Desert, where, starting in October, 2012 built a plant for the production of composite structures and a hangar to assemble the future aircraft.


Rollout Scaled Composites Model 351 Roc from the hangar. Source: dailymail.co.uk.

Large aircraft have large areas: the composite workshop occupies 8100 square meters, and the hangar is already 8600. The take-off betonka, however, is compact enough for an aircraft of similar dimensions — only 3800 meters.

Model 351 is in many ways a “hodgepodge” of aviation-proven solutions, so Boeing 747-400 shared the engine, chassis, wing mechanization control and on-board equipment. Moreover, for the project, Paul Allen bought two used (!) Aircraft from United Airlines, assembled back in 1997 year. The carrier aircraft of the Stratolaunch Systems system is designed according to the two-fuselage high-wing scheme with a straight wing of high elongation and horizontal tail in the rear fuselage. In the central part of the wing, between the fuselages, there is a suspension system and a rocket launch vehicle weighing up to 250 tons. The main structural material of the airframe is carbon fiber, which has become the hallmark of the Scaled Composites office.


One of the two cockpits. Source: dailymail.co.uk

The 28 wheels of the aircraft chassis make it possible to treat the take-off concrete with a mass of 590 tons. Under the wing consoles are suspended six good old PW4056 from Pratt & Whitney, creating 25,7 tons of traction each. The wingspan makes the “Bird Rukh” the most-most in aviation stories - both the An-225 Mriya (88,4 m), the A380 (79,8 m), and even the immortal creation of Howard Hughes H-4 Hercules with its gigantic 97,5 meters lose. But in the maximum take-off weight, the two-fuselage noticeably loses the Mriyé with its 640 tons, but firmly holds the second line in this indicator in the world. Engineers plan the ability of the aircraft to accelerate to 850 km / h and launch the launch vehicle at a range of up to 2200 from the parent airfield. An important design decision was the fact of the possibility of using the Model 351 as a transport (read, military transport) aircraft in order to recapture the costs of development and operation. For this, the missile hitch-uncoupling unit is dismantled and the aircraft is ready for the transportation of oversized items, which, for example, cannot fit in the An-124 Ruslan. A short history of Model 351 has the following chronology:

- 31 May 2017 of the year - rolling out of the hangar;
- 29 June 2017 of the year - The Federal Aviation Administration of the United States issued the board number N351SL;
- September 2017 of the year - the first starts of the engines;
- 18 December 2017 of the year - the first taxiing and jogging on the airfield at a speed of 50 km / h.


Pratt & Whitney PW4056 trio with hoods folded down. Source: dailymail.co.uk

Development engineers are optimistic that in the current "Bird Ruch" will rise on the wing, and in the year 2019 will launch the first rocket into space. True, there is nothing to start yet - SpaceX Mask released their project back in 2012, due to the lack of resources for a secondary project for them. And the redesign of Falcon 9 constructs for Stratolaunch Systems was already too fundamental. The search for new rocket builders led Paul Allen to OSC, which offered a solid-fuel Pegasus II, sending a tonne of useful mass to Earth orbit 6,1. But by the year 2014 Pegasus was abandoned in favor of the new product - a three-stage Thunderbolt rocket equipped with two solid-fuel and one liquid (hydrogen + oxygen) engines. By September, 2014, the US office of Sierra Nevada, spoke about the development of the Dream Chaser spaceplane, adapted for the Stratolaunch system. Such a spaceplane will send up to three astronauts into space and safely return them to the ground. Finally, the system can send spacecraft and similar objects in a suborbital mode to any point on the globe in just 1,5-2 hours. Feel the ambiguity of the “peaceful” mission of Stratolaunch Systems and Sierra Nevada?


Paul Allen, chief financier of the Stratolaunch Systems project, trying to go down in the history of the global aviation industry. Source: dailymail.co.uk

Eventually news about the last two projects, they quietly left the information field, and Paul Allen got “sick” with the new idea of ​​using his brainchild. Immediately, three Pegasys XL light rockets are proposed to be hung under the Model 351 wing, however the market for services of such “kids” is very narrow - no more than one launch per year. Is it worth for the sake of such a monster? So the engineers were able to persuade the Stratolaunch Systems management to develop ... their own launch vehicle. Before 1 June 2018, the company plans to test its first rocket engines at the Stennis Space Center, the first 5,1 million dollars have already been allocated for this. As a result, Paul Allen was faced with the need to develop the entire air launch complex from scratch — from GDP to a launch vehicle. And it seems that it will not work out with “spare” spare parts here.
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. seti April 24 2018 15: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I would like to hear the full voiced amount spent on this .. I have one feeling that this creation will break in half in the air?
    1. Borik April 24 2018 16: 44 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Perhaps it will take off and then catch up as the immortal creation of Howard Hughes. And then the Americans will boast of how smart they are, they made the coolest plane.
      1. NIKNN April 24 2018 18: 01 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        An important design decision was the fact that the Model 351 could be used as a transport (read, military transport) aircraft,
        And where will he transport something, if there is only one airfield from which it can be operated?
        A purely American breakthrough into the future.
        1. Gene Concrete April 24 2018 20: 44 New
          • 12
          • 0
          +12
          They didn’t understand the article correctly, a 1000+ tonne machine would have had a takeoff problem, and a stratolon with its mass of 590 tons could take off from ordinary airfields, since the mriya somehow flies.
          Regarding its use as a transporter, a completely different question arises, it is doubtful whether it is possible to land with cargo under the wing, because initially the structure is not designed to take off with a rocket and land with a rocket, this is far from the same in terms of loads on the structure.
          1. NIKNN April 24 2018 22: 22 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Gene Concrete
            They didn’t understand the article correctly, a 1000+ tonne machine would have had a takeoff problem, and a stratolon with its mass of 590 tons could take off from ordinary airfields, since the mriya somehow flies.
            Regarding its use as a transporter, a completely different question arises, it is doubtful whether it is possible to land with cargo under the wing, because initially the structure is not designed to take off with a rocket and land with a rocket, this is far from the same in terms of loads on the structure.

            I read somewhere that in size (the width of the problem he had ...
    2. Ruslan April 25 2018 02: 15 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      “l” logic- a 640-ton “mriya” with 12 tons of cargo is not profitable, and a 590-ton cargo with 6 tons of load, with the same weight of a rocket carrier, this is a good example of profitability.
      conclusion? Yevgeny Fedorov wanted to lick the Yankees so that he contradicted himself that the Soviet mriy surpassed the amers 30 years ago, and was a full-fledged transport aircraft, and an air launch based on it would be more profitable than the American one even after 30 years :-)
      This is still Eugene Fedorov does not know about the project of the Hercules plane, which the union could build as a nef.ig do.
  2. axxmanm April 24 2018 15: 53 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    After the Kidalov Mask with an air launch rocket for 240 tons of Falcon Air launch mass, the system has no prospects ..
    An indicative dying convulsion is the announcement of the launch of 3 (!!!) undershots (23 tons each) of Pegasus immediately - a more delusional justification for the existence of such a monster with a carrying capacity of 250 tons and it is impossible to imagine.
  3. spech April 24 2018 16: 33 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Cool, made a plane and think, for what purpose?
  4. tihonmarine April 24 2018 18: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Soviet “Mriya” of Antonov is still an unsurpassed car. And of course, the Yankees will not allow such machines to be released by the third bit Ukraine.
    1. Aviator_ April 24 2018 21: 59 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      And Dill is not able to produce Mriy "- the center section was made for her by Ulyanovsk, and the assembly took place in Tashkent.
      1. Grenader April 25 2018 12: 37 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Aviator_
        And Dill is not able to produce Mriy "- the center section was made for her by Ulyanovsk, and the assembly took place in Tashkent.

        They sold all the documentation for it to the Chinese.
        1. Aviator_ April 25 2018 19: 46 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Documentation is one thing, and a manufacturing plant is another. Dill have never had such production capacities; the Chinese may be built someday.
  5. Elka13 April 25 2018 11: 58 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    That’s why Americans can be respected, for a business approach. Two times, the use of ready-made engines and chassis, composites specialists designed and assembled a carbon-fiber glider, and now he is handsome, ready! They also built a giant hangar) as I understand it was concrete. Now in our country only TK would have been written for about 5-10 years, and it is impossible to imagine the construction and creation itself without delays and corruption scandals (shorter than another 10 years. And do not write about money, it would be many times more expensive with us. Here it is and there is a difference between a business approach and a state one.
  6. Wolka April 25 2018 17: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    and it was worth sculpting such a freak
  7. Normal ok 19 June 2018 09: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    As a result, news about the last two projects slowly left the information field

    New technologies are being developed at such projects and the design idea is being perfected. "And experience, son of difficult mistakes .."
    PS:
    as well as pilots reconnaissance and, in combination, the fastest aircraft SR-71

    SR71 is a truly ingenious design job. But, although they were now (sort of) deactivated, they had already outlived themselves.
  8. ycuce234-san 16 March 2019 09: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Regarding its use as a transporter, a completely different question arises, it is doubtful whether it is possible to land with cargo under the wing, because initially the structure is not designed to take off with a rocket and land with a rocket, this is far from the same in terms of loads on the structure.


    Planting is not always necessary. If "Rukh" will be in the role of a military transporter, then you can drop it by parachute. In principle, it could have been made by an air tanker by hanging a 200-ton fuel tank.