Submarine "Kalmar" will be removed from the composition of the Pacific Fleet

By 2020, the main carriers of ICBMs in the Pacific navy (Pacific Fleet) will become nuclear submarines (nuclear submarines) of the Borey project, write News with reference to the Russian military department.

At the same time, two of the three nuclear-powered submarines of the 667BDR Kalmar project - the George the Victorious and the Podolsk, which are currently based in Kamchatka, will be withdrawn and disposed of from the Pacific Fleet.

According to experts, these are reliable submarines with high combat potential, but they have almost exhausted their resources.

To date, "Squids" remained only on the Pacific Fleet. Each such cruiser carries X-NUMX P-16P liquid rockets.

The submarines of the 667BDR project became real “workhorses”, “the naval component of Russia's strategic nuclear forces in the 1990s and 2000s,” noted naval expert Dmitry Boltenkov.

There were no serious accidents with "Squid", they showed themselves well in the difficult conditions of the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean. These are successful submarines, but any ship has a limited lifespan. The boats of the 667 project were built at the end of the 1970-s, more than 30 over the years. In addition, new technologies, new missiles. Now for the fleet massively built "Boreas". As soon as they are ready, they will replace the "Kalmaram". Only the "Ryazan" will remain in the composition of the Pacific Fleet, which has recently undergone modernization and extension of the resource,

told the expert.

“Podolsk” (given its name in 1998) can be called a legendary boat: “in 1980, the submarine made a long-distance transition under the Arctic ice from the North to the Pacific Fleet, for which the campaign commander and submarine captain received the stars of Heroes of the Soviet Union,” reminds the newspaper.

Comments

[NEXUS]

And the Dolphins still remain ... but it’s time for Calmaram to rest.

[Greg Miller]

"Dolphins" today are the basis of strategic submarines ....

[jjj]

Yes, the BDRs did a nice job. And the BDRMs were built after 941 Ave.

[NEXUS]

Quote: jjj

Yes, the BDRs did a nice job. And the BDRMs were built after 941 Ave.

I am very concerned about the issue of upgrading the Mace ... Sineva is one of the most reliable ICBMs in the world, and is incomparably more powerful than the main caliber of Boreev.

[Chertt]

Quote: NEXUS

I am very worried about the issue of upgrading the Mace.

At one time, the topic of the Mace and Sineva was widely discussed. And this hour passions subsided, but questions remained. It would be nice to find a specialist, and at VO seriously considered this topic. Perhaps in a series of articles, one is clearly not enough

[jjj]

So it’s already not R-29РМУ2 "Sineva", but R-29РМУ2.1 "Liner"

[Sergey985]

Time flies. It’s even sad that the BDR are ending their service. Great boats.

[RASKAT]

Everything is going according to plan, before the end of the 2020 of the year, two more boats, 955 Suvorov and Alexander 3, should be commissioned by the Pacific Fleet. Just to replace the two decommissioned squid.

[Evgeniy667b]

First, let them come better, and then write off, suck and then recycle if there is not enough mind for more. I was fortunate enough to contribute to some of the SSBNs. I touched a little on the final series of “Navage”, “Mureny” were all with my participation, and the first two “Squid”. It was a good time, it's nice to remember. And the main thing is the realization of the importance of the case!

[g1v2]

The competition for the disposal of both squids, as far as I know, has already been announced. Although there is still no information about the cancellation. In theory, one of Boreas should be replaced by him already this year. The second is as follows, but this is not a fact. They can shift for a year.

[san4es]

Quote: NEXUS

And the Dolphins are still ....

.. The main project carrier 667BDRM - K-51 "Verkhoturye" - was laid down in February 1981 at the Northern Machine-Building Plant in Severodvinsk, launched in January .1984.
weaponry
Torpedo
mine armament 4 bow TA 533 mm caliber
Ammunition (torpedoes): 12
533 mm torpedoes SAET-60M, 53-65M, PLUR "Waterfall"
up to 24 min instead of a part of torpedoes.
Missile armament 16 ballistic missiles R-29RM, R-29RMU2 or R-29RMU2.1 "Liner"
Air defense 4 ... 8 MANPADS 9K310 Igla-1 / 9K38 Igla

[Greg Miller]

We withdraw and remove at a much higher rate than we introduce and set ....

[Muvka]

Really? I think you are cunning.

[Greg Miller]

No, you are cunning ....

[Muvka]

Are these all your reasons? Well, what missile carriers have been decommissioned over the past 5 years. Please name.

[Greg Miller]

And why do you have such a horizon for 5 years? Why for example not 18 or 25?

[Muvka]

Well, let's take 50 years. I'm not against. Will you be happy? Or do you want to capture 90 years? So there was almost no country.

[Greg Miller]

And what has changed since then (since the 90s)? Or do you want to say that during this time (since the 90s) Russia has had more submarines in service? If so, why are diesel engines already being sent to the Northern and Pacific Fleets? I’ll tell you - from HOPELESS ... But, in comparison with the 90s, the yachts and palaces of the ruling oligarchy in Russia have become much better and richer ...

[Muvka]

So I can say that in 5 years they introduced 3 new missile carriers and 1 more on the way. I continue to wait on you for data on the number of launched missile carriers for 5 years.

[Muvka]

And I'm waiting and waiting. Well, at least write that merged. Or plusers, at least you name it.

[Borik]

Now, the Boreas are being massively built for the fleet.

If they had said that it was planned to build two dozen Boreevs for our fleet, then it would be massive.
Well, it’s time to rest and thank you for serving the country.

[Vitaly Anisimov]

According to experts, these are reliable submarines with high combat potential, but they have almost exhausted their resources.

It’s better not to risk the crew ..! We are building new and more modern
Good luck submariners, Russia hopes for you ..

[beeper]

Honestly, dear Meehan, the hand was already reaching for you, as almost always, but ... the unusual, very non-Russian submarine silhouette stopped me
Bah, this is a German submarine, similar to the "U-2" project, but in the distance is the Tirpitz silhouette in the distance? Yes, and under the Soviet Order of the Great Patriotic War, the Hitler's “Panther”, reflecting the massive attack of the Soviet T-34-85 (one “thirty-four” at the very top, already burns with a bright flame ..., everything as it was in life, the main German German tanks and machine guns are shooting at the back of the hill, not subject to direct fire, shooting at the crest of the heaving, against the sky, advancing Soviet tanks, directly into the bottom of the corps weakly protected by armor, and infantry ...) accompanied by the Red Army ... ?
What kind of mischievous "wheelchair" has your "demotivator" invented, comrade Mikhan (knowing you in absentia for more than a year, I do not suspect you of this but your vigilance is probably necessary to "sharpen" ?)?

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Similarly, the submarine on the screen saver !!! There were no her men, I swear!
..Here I got, but I liked the song, etc. can kick deservedly ..!
Admins, please remove this provocation .. Please!

[Monarchist]

Quote: Chertt

Quote: NEXUS

I am very worried about the issue of upgrading the Mace.

At one time, the topic of the Mace and Sineva was widely discussed. And this hour passions subsided, but questions remained. It would be nice to find a specialist, and at VO seriously considered this topic. Perhaps in a series of articles, one is clearly not enough

It would be great, but the site with its specialists strained, not to consider a specialist in the Mace of Shirokorad (at least he: “Secrets of Russian artillery” was written with talent), and therefore I hope that someone from the comrades will write.

[Bulrumeb]

Now, the Boreas are being massively built for the fleet.

and where in large numbers? is it that at least 2 Boreas will come to replace 4 retiring Squids?

[Kudrevkn]

Yes, of course, Igor Vladimirovich Spassky - A GENIUS !!! It is a pity that Putin did not understand this ?! So, he ran through the mountains for barmaley - the hero of Russia, and lifted the Kursk from the bottom, having carried out a unique ship-lifting operation, he is not worthy of the THIRD "star"! ??? In the USSR they knew how to appreciate HR! And in the modern Russian Federation, only violanchelists and conductors receive BATTLE orders?

[beeper]

I don’t quite know, dear KudrevKN, how I don’t know the “Negro of advanced years,” did the absurd (IMHO) Soviet award practice of “multiple”, twice ÷ four times, Heroes, implicitly leveling (as if “once”, continue in modern Russia ) the highest title of Hero of the Soviet Union (Russia) ???
Then it may be better to bring it in line with the "St. George's bow" - Hero of Russia 1, 2, 3 ... n-th degree.
In the USSR, in my opinion, they were not very able to value HR, people, and individual, not so numerous against the general background, exceptions only confirm the general Soviet tendency to be careless about “personnel”, military and civilian!

[Kudrevkn]

Immediately felt the style of "terry liberal" ?! Hero 1-2-3-n degree? A la Brezhnev? By the way. the years of the reign of Leonid Ilyich are remembered by the majority as the brightest and brightest - unlike the Gorbachevs, Yeltsins, Medvedevs, Putin and others .... THE MAN did not rule, but RULED the State !!! And he knew how to appreciate the shots - what flies, crawls and shoots today - the merit is BREZHNEVA !!! And what about the “Cook's children” what merits to the Country and the People? Could it be FREE Medicine and Education? Right to work? Right to a Fair Trial? Or maybe "the right to terrorism, drugs, pedophilia and homosexuality"?

[beeper]

Dear KudrevKN, you are so eager to find out if I felt in you a "terry liberalist (by the way, we are Russians, in a Western manner, we do not say" liberalist ", usually we call pro-Western latent collaborators who hate the Russian world and Russians ) ", or want praise for your" style "?!
Of course, I felt some kind of “darling” that was not good from your comment, the nasty phrase about “Putin didn’t understand” and “ran around the mountains for the barmaley-hero of Russia”, in which even the highest and most honorable Russian award Hero of Russia It is written underlined with dismissive, with a small letter, very characterize you !
Although you are trying to cover these anti-Russian attacks with a demagogic flair about the blessed Brezhnev times, valuable personnel, and the praises of the respected academician I.V. Spassky, but, alas, you failed to disguise your West-liberal essence (however, like your level of knowledge of the Russian language, a minor victim of the USE, what’s the point?) You’re right in this, you feel the “terry style” !

[Kudrevkn]

Yes, you’re right - my comment is written in a derogatory and insulting form for you, "hurry - patriots" of the new "ball" formation?

[beeper]

Yes, you (non-patriot?) KudrevKN, your homeland (?), Russia and its defenders (in your opinion, derogatory, "running through the mountains for barmaley"), formally insult , and not me, back in the Soviet youth, shot and slashed ,, Negra of advanced years "," Muscovite "and" quilted jacket-colorado, which is now "on knives" and "on the dregs" !
Also, the "ballistic" of their condo ("old formation"? ) boast ?!

[Kudrevkn]

Thank you for your clarification! I spoke personally with Sergei Borisovich Ivanov on the awarding of Igor Vladimirovich Spassky! And then he received about the same answer: "Like, the title of Hero of the Russian Federation" for the feat "I.V. Spassky did not deserve" !? And the title of "Hero of Labor" then did not have time to establish !? Well, something like this. Thank you again for your clarification! Good luck

[gukoyan]

Why dispose of?
How a museum would have gotten bored ... Well, or a monument. A great boat for its time was ...

[Munchhausen]

It would be possible to make a museum out of one, one that made a long transition under the ice of the Arctic.

[beeper]

I fully support your initiative, comrade Mungausen!
Ultimately, in the state LONG-TERM perspective, in the combat and patriotic education of the younger generations, such a tangible-material, subject naval museum would have paid off handsomely, even compared to the considerable costs of its equipment and maintenance, and a miserable pile of cut colored paper for the sale of "needles"!
But in order to establish and organize such a museum on the basis of the legendary masterpiece of naval shipbuilding, you need to be an official-statesman (think for generations ahead) and a real, not declarative, Patriot of the Fatherland!

[Munchhausen]

Drive to a city where there is a naval educational institution.
You are right, it will pay off handsomely. Not in money, but in more.

[The Siberian barber]

".... In addition, new technologies, new missiles have appeared. Now, the Boreas are being massively built for the fleet ..."
The word "Massively", nevertheless, is inappropriate))) BUT, it’s better than nothing) Still, the deadlines did not shift to the right ..

[Old26]

Quote: Evgeniy667b

First, let’s better come, and then write off, sucks and then disposal, if there is not enough mind for more. I was fortunate enough to contribute to some of the SSBNs. I touched a little the final series of “Navage”, “Mureny” were all with my participation, and the first two “Squids”. It was a good time, it is nice to remember. And the main thing is the realization of the importance of the case!

Actually, Eugene, the news (in the article) is out of date, I don’t even know how much.
= K-223 Podolsk (serial No. 395) was decommissioned in 2016
= K-433 "St. George the Victorious" (serial number 397) was decommissioned in 2017
At the end of last, beginning of this year, information on a contract for the discharge of spent nuclear fuel from reactors in 2018 for a total amount of 320 million 985 thousand 134 rubles was published on the procurement website.
That is, in the ranks of these boats in fact no longer, respectively, a year and a half