Pentagon criticized Russian air defense systems

151
Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White said during a briefing that the Russian air defense systems were unable to respond in time to American strikes in Syria.

Pentagon criticized Russian air defense systems




Of the land-based missiles launched by the regime of [Syrian President] Bashar Assad, almost all were launched after the last of our missiles hit the target. Russia's missile defense systems were completely ineffective.
- says White

In addition, according to White, the United States is convinced that all the missiles launched at facilities in Syria hit the targets, and Russia's statement to the contrary is allegedly false.

Russia falsely claimed that the Syrian missile defense had shot down a large number of missiles, whereas in reality we had hit all our targets.
- She claimed.

The representative of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States, Lieutenant General Kenneth Mackenzie added that this assessment applies only to the Syrian systems, and not to the Russian ones, since the latter were not involved during the launch of missile strikes.

However, I can say that the Syrian air defense systems, which were completely produced in Russia, were developed there and were supported by the Russian military, were actively used, but turned out to be ineffective.
- added MacKenzie.
151 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +47
    April 20 2018 12: 09
    Nothing more can be left for them ... they screwed up to the fullest in Syria and now they will tell ... In the east there is a saying ... do not say how much ... halva, halva ... it will not be sweet in the mouth ...
    1. +10
      April 20 2018 12: 13
      Russia falsely claimed that the Syrian missile defense had shot down a large number of missiles, whereas in reality we had hit all our targets.

      We are always Russian time .. I remember Hitler also argued by issuing an order to attack Russia!
      1. +8
        April 20 2018 12: 23
        Self-sufficient crap these Yankees, they themselves are enough, well, to hell with them! am

        Two drunk friends are sitting in a garbage dump.
        - Vasya, do you respect me?
        - Just like that, Edik! Are you me?
        - I respect you very much!
        You see, Vasya, you and I are respected people!
        1. +10
          April 20 2018 12: 38
          The U.S. is convinced that all missiles launched at targets in Syria hit targets,

          And where is the vaunted US satellite group that shows the world how smart missiles hit targets !!!! Someone is lying, and who is not, time will tell !!!! smile
          1. +25
            April 20 2018 12: 43
            Hollywood works. Still not finished shooting. smile
            1. +5
              April 20 2018 12: 52
              How? Still filming!? With the moon, they foiled very quickly.
              Quote: Hellraiser
              Hollywood works. Still not finished shooting. smile
              1. +6
                April 20 2018 13: 02
                There were a lot of missiles. So far they’ll shoot each one as it flew as it exploded. And it is in HD.
          2. 0
            April 23 2018 13: 54
            What are you ?! Cannot show hits! It’s dark at night!
            1. 0
              April 23 2018 20: 45
              And they are backlit, spotlights, you know.
              1. 0
                April 24 2018 17: 08
                see the spotlights are not highlighted overheated.
        2. +9
          April 20 2018 12: 44
          Quote: Major Yurik
          Missile defense systems made by Russia were completely ineffective, says White.

          It’s too late to drink Borjomi, when the kidneys have fallen off and there is nothing to do a good face with a bad game, the whole world laughs at minke whales.
          1. +3
            April 20 2018 13: 45
            And what they still have to do is calm their inner audience. hi
            1. +5
              April 20 2018 14: 04
              put this fool with big stars in the next track on a rocket, let him personally control the hit))
              1. +11
                April 20 2018 18: 04
                If the air defense systems were rubbish, then it was not necessary to say anything. And they are like programmed "talking heads." Any normal person will say that to throw out 1-1,5 billion dollars. to destroy several buildings is too much for the Pentagon’s bloated budget. If these grandmas were given to Assad (even an order of magnitude less), he would have demolished them. laughing
                On the other hand. Whole west. the coalition does not fly there without permission and approval from the General Staff. If the air defense system is rubbish, then why coordinate it? There those Turks generally disappeared after the downing of Sushka, Bibi also with losses and beats from Lebanon. Why would they do this if the complexes are worthless? Yes, and why use expensive missiles, can then work with conventional batteries? Such questions are not asked to these clowns (official representatives of the "hexagon"), and if they are asked, then ... "Are you from Russia? No comment!". hi
                1. +3
                  April 20 2018 18: 37
                  hard to argue))
                2. -1
                  April 26 2018 03: 28
                  The cost of modern tomahawks is measured in hundreds of thousands of bucks, the numbers 220-250 are called. They are produced on an industrial scale, and they are technologically simplified, plastic parts, etc. are actively used. Those. in reality, the cost of the ammunition involved in the strike does not reach 100 lyam. At the same time, they substantively studied how air defense works and will now make adjustments.
                  The situation is somewhat reminiscent of the 1943 (or 42 - I do not remember) year when the British put 6000 people (Canadians and other husks) on the ship and sent to conquer the German city on the mainland. When they landed and took control of the center, they asked the headquarters and asked what they should do next. To which the headquarters replied that they did not think that the soldiers could do this and did not plan what to do in the event of a capture. In short, for the most part they were eventually killed. BUT, the Germans concluded from this that they have a cool defense system and do not need to do anything, and the British - that they need to prepare much better. And in the end they chopped off half of Europe.
                  I mean, you don’t have to rejoice much, we are not dealing with idiots.
                  1. 0
                    April 28 2018 08: 22
                    Half of Europe, starting from the West, is even east of Smolensk!
                    You must be more modest!
        3. +8
          April 20 2018 12: 47
          there is a variation - two drunk, one crawls on four, the second goes holding onto the fence. going to creeping: "do you respect me?" creeping "I'm proud of you !!"
      2. +16
        April 20 2018 12: 38
        In America, all the best. In Russia, everything is bad
        1. +2
          April 20 2018 13: 02
          So the "exceptional" and the good old PPSh do not disdain. The photo is full.
          https://cdn.fishki.net/upload/post/2017/05/15/229
          1345 / 12-0.jpg
          Here's another
          http://gallery.ykt.ru/galleries/old/history/34717
          6.jpg
          1. 0
            April 24 2018 17: 11
            sorry that is not visible.
    2. +4
      April 20 2018 12: 13
      Meanwhile, perhaps we will soon see evidence.
      Russia will provide evidence that Syrian air defense shot down part of the coalition's missiles

      https://ria.ru/syria/20180420/1519039510.html
      1. +15
        April 20 2018 12: 21
        They only say what they have written in their papers and any tricky question from the press puts them at a standstill. Since the answers to them are not provided. In short, trained parrots.
        1. +7
          April 20 2018 12: 33
          Quote: Borik
          They only say what they have written in their papers and any tricky question from the press puts them at a standstill. Since the answers to them are not provided. In short, trained parrots.

          They just cheer themselves up! They do not want to admit that their blow failed, and we have two rockets! I kept wondering why ours are talking about 103 missiles, and striped ones about 105? It is now clear!
          1. +1
            April 20 2018 17: 40
            I kept wondering why ours are talking about 103 missiles, and striped ones about 105? It is now clear!

            Scrupulously noticed!
          2. +2
            April 21 2018 09: 10
            These are the two most “smart” missiles decided to emigrate! laughing
          3. 0
            April 23 2018 06: 34
            and then it turns out that it was not the Syrians who transferred, but they were immediately put on a volleyball net in the suburbs
      2. +5
        April 20 2018 12: 29
        Quote: Muvka
        Meanwhile, perhaps we will soon see evidence.
        Russia will provide evidence that Syrian air defense shot down part of the coalition's missiles

        https://ria.ru/syria/20180420/1519039510.html

        It would have been better, but while the war is only going on, one sofa is arguing with another on the site ... although sometimes they come to some compromise ... smile
        1. +1
          April 20 2018 14: 52
          The double-pass version of the missiles is understandable, however, if the number of missiles was guessed to an accuracy of 99,5%, then did all missiles fall into the air defense zones?
          1. 0
            April 20 2018 14: 57
            Quote: igorserg
            The double-pass version of the missiles is understandable, however, if the number of missiles was guessed to an accuracy of 99,5%, then did all missiles fall into the air defense zones?

            Yes, I don’t know ..., I just gave alternative opinions (not mine) But in essence, I said ...
            Meanwhile, perhaps we will soon see evidence.
            Russia will provide evidence that Syrian air defense shot down part of the coalition's missiles
            https://ria.ru/syria/20180420/1519039510.html

            It would be better .....
            1. +1
              April 20 2018 15: 10
              :) An alternative opinion is that there was an agreement. Americans fired at junk, our junk hit 2/3 missiles (by the way, anti-aircraft guns seem to be not a good indicator). Either the parties wanted to reveal each other's "military secrets", or simply did not face the public in the mud.
              1. +2
                April 20 2018 15: 17
                I don’t feel like digging, there are shooting tables. Take my word for it: They fired for 6 s ++. I’ll explain that 60% of the targets hit are already excellent, but here, with the launch standard, for these "old" systems there are 2 missiles per target, 103 missiles were made with 123 launches and with such excellent the result ... At the same time, the S-200 made 9 launches and not a single defeat ... it turns out almost launch + hitting a target, this is cool even for our air defense ... request
                1. +3
                  April 20 2018 15: 27
                  Is it not clear that the number 71 is accidental and erroneous, which came to the Russians from the Syrians? The Syrians first announced 13 shot down missiles, then increased to 17.
                  And this is doubtful, but at least, probably, in 17 cases the rocket launchers fired at real targets. And in other cases - in pure milk for a show of activity.
                  1. +5
                    April 20 2018 15: 34
                    Quote: voyaka uh
                    Is it really not clear

                    I’m not used to analyze and draw conclusions that cannot be doubted on the basis of press statements and discussions on the forums (and I don’t advise you, although this is everyone’s right), so far I have only guesses and assumptions, and since I don’t have access to the materials for discussion I won’t enter, I don’t want to peep ... a liar to pass for.
                    1. +2
                      April 20 2018 16: 10
                      Okay, I accept that point of view. drinks
                      1. +1
                        April 20 2018 16: 11
                        Quote: voyaka uh
                        Okay, I accept that point of view. drinks

                        drinks
                  2. 0
                    April 23 2018 09: 33
                    Well then, the number 103 should also be erroneous ... however, it too coincides with the number 105.
                  3. 0
                    April 23 2018 21: 20
                    Do the Israelis want to test on their fighters?
                  4. 0
                    April 25 2018 13: 21
                    Listen dear !!! Have you been there you counted all the missiles, maybe you missed or missed ??? So, there is a saying. not knowing the ford do not pop into the water. So here it’s almost the same thing, you don’t know the business, don’t harness yourself.
              2. 0
                April 23 2018 21: 19
                As for the agreement - I suppose, it seems. But 2 \ 3 shot down - this is a very good result. The question is only who and what
          2. 0
            April 23 2018 12: 14
            The number of missiles eventually coincided. The Pentagon announced the launch of 105 missiles. The General Staff announced the participation of 103 missiles in the attack. Then they found another 2 "tired". 103 + 2 = 105, isn't it?
            I think the situation was as follows - ours tracked the whole picture with their systems. The Syrians tracked fragmentarily, within the limits of the capabilities of their systems.
      3. +3
        April 20 2018 13: 00
        Quote: Muvka
        Meanwhile, perhaps we will soon see evidence.

        The evidence is already in Russia - two "down to earth" smart and beautiful ... Lewis Carroll is alive! States in the looking glass.
      4. 0
        April 24 2018 13: 59
        Here the coolest thing is that several missiles were able to be cracked by the Krasukha (probably) in flight, and gently landed. Now that they’ll do a lobotomy in the Moscow Region, they’ll see how smart they are. )))
    3. +4
      April 20 2018 12: 14
      Quote: Vard
      Nothing more can be left for them ... they screwed up to the fullest in Syria and now they will tell ... In the east there is a saying ... do not say how much ... halva, halva ... it will not be sweet in the mouth ...

      They can’t stop already, they star and star, zvizdabol shorter! bully
    4. +4
      April 20 2018 12: 14
      Lavrov today said that soon evidence of the successful operation of air defense should be provided, up to the testimony of objective control.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    5. +2
      April 20 2018 12: 29
      AUNT OF RIGHT - OUR AIR IS BAD, AND THE AMERICAN IN KSA WAS HOW IT WORKED.
      The US does not need victory, money is needed
      1. +2
        April 20 2018 14: 07
        Quote: antivirus
        AUNT OF RIGHT - OUR AIR IS BAD, AND THE AMERICAN IN KSA WAS HOW IT WORKED.

        good Our air defense of almost forty years ago is bad - in their opinion, and in the opinion of the Yemenite Hussites - bad American is completely fresh! hi
        1. 0
          April 20 2018 18: 14
          with any air defense and navy --amers need a lot of money !!!! AND THE QUALITY OF WEAPONS DOES NOT MATTER. This is an entourage for making money again.
    6. +2
      April 20 2018 13: 00
      And I said for a long time - on Hmeimim S-400 inflatable
    7. 0
      April 20 2018 16: 18
      So she came spring ..and paranoia. That's right: either they have nothing to say or they told us something wrong. But I think that they have nothing left but another lie, because by their standards this is SUPER Failed.
    8. 0
      April 23 2018 21: 17
      Well, they still convinced their own and the main part of the world, and that they believe in characteristically, and therefore they can be justified by the subsequent invasion ...
  2. +4
    April 20 2018 12: 10
    However, I can say that the Syrian air defense systems, which were completely produced in Russia, were developed there and were supported by the Russian military, were actively used, but turned out to be ineffective.

    I wonder, on what basis is this conclusion, if our air defense was not involved? There were no threats to our bases, and the result of a missile strike is a destroyed laboratory for the production of drugs ...
    1. +4
      April 20 2018 12: 12
      Quote: NEXUS
      However, I can say that the Syrian air defense systems, which were completely produced in Russia, were developed there and were supported by the Russian military, were actively used, but turned out to be ineffective.

      I wonder, on what basis is this conclusion, if our air defense was not involved? There were no threats to our bases, and the result of a missile strike is a destroyed laboratory for the production of drugs ...


      Intrigue is growing .... laughing laughing
      1. +7
        April 20 2018 12: 14
        Quote: vorobey
        Intrigue is growing ....

        Autotraining is of course fun and useful ... it's like in a joke-I don’t want to go to the toilet, I don’t want to go to the toilet ... I don’t fuck, I don’t. wassat
        1. +1
          April 20 2018 12: 26
          This is not a joke ... this is a common practice for prostate cancer ...
          1. +3
            April 20 2018 12: 29
            Quote: Vard
            This is not a joke ... this is a common practice for prostate cancer ...

            I spoke of great need, not small ... censorship however. hi
            1. +1
              April 20 2018 12: 30
              I apologize ... did not understand ...
    2. +3
      April 20 2018 14: 13
      Quote: NEXUS
      However, I can say that the Syrian air defense systems, which were completely produced in Russia, were developed there and were supported by the Russian military, were actively used, but turned out to be ineffective.

      I wonder, on what basis is this conclusion, if our air defense was not involved? There were no threats to our bases, and the result of a missile strike is a destroyed laboratory for the production of drugs ...

      So they actually had to talk not about Russian air defense, but about outdated Soviet ... laughing Yes, and about good or bad - this is still a big question! It is necessary to look whether the air defense completed the combat mission or not. You need to know whether the United States has achieved its goals with this blow or not. The answers to these questions, especially regarding the Americans, by definition cannot have a true option. The Americans will never say that they are complete suckers, and their missiles sucks! Regarding the Syrians - I want to believe that our military told the truth, which, in general, is confirmed by indirect data. hi
      1. 0
        April 21 2018 06: 56
        It’s interesting ... when they pour mud on us ... Americans do it confidently ... but when their actions are commented on by VO ... then they use the expressions “I want to believe”, etc. There is an information war and so can’t win it ...
  3. +7
    April 20 2018 12: 11
    this black woman sounds like she’s speaking, but what is this man doing next to him?
    1. +4
      April 20 2018 13: 03
      Quote: taiga2018
      this black woman

      This is not so about the "exceptional" ... She wears the proud title of African-American .. Although for me personally - the same x ... vegetable, only a side view.
      Anecdote on the topic ...
      On the bus, a man in front of a negro standing:
      - Hey, gypsy! Are you coming out?
      He turns to him:
      - I'm not a gypsy, I'm an Ethiopian.
      Man:
      - Gosha! What kind of gypsies are there then ??? belay
      1. +1
        April 20 2018 16: 55
        Quote: helmi8
        She wears the proud title of African American ..

        What is characteristic, with a surname ... White (White). It happens. wassat
      2. 0
        April 23 2018 21: 25
        I heard another option. "So I say, Ethiopian is your mother, are you going out?"
  4. +5
    April 20 2018 12: 13
    It sucks!
    The talking head of the Pentagon Dana White is as "sucks" as the talking heads of the White House and the State Department. He constantly carries such a blizzard that the ears of the journalists fade and they don’t give an answer to any sharp question from their side.
    1. +5
      April 20 2018 12: 16
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Constantly carries such a blizzard,

      each country should have such a carrier, because we also have one such as Putin admitted ...
      1. +4
        April 20 2018 12: 23
        He expected someone to remember Peskov. But the comparison is not entirely correct. He speaks expressing his thoughts and they do not write him a text.
  5. +2
    April 20 2018 12: 14
    Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White said during a briefing

    Another Pentagon talking doll, with sawdust instead of brains ... laughing
  6. +3
    April 20 2018 12: 15
    It’s good, let yourself be comforted, who is against. Russian air defense is generally inflatable, it’s easier for us.
    1. +1
      April 20 2018 12: 23
      No, it’s just harder for us.
      As soon as they finally convince themselves that the Russian Armed Forces are no good at all, they will immediately begin the war.
      We don’t need it anyway.
      And the fact that they are broadcasting there says exactly one thing - no real results on America have had a sobering effect, they will try to continue in the near future.
      True, the US military has a much more cautious opinion.
      But they do not rule the country. The oligarchic elite is stepping in, surprise is like picking from one famous nationality. And for them, as the authors of the most massive methods of destroying humanity, the scenario of world chaos is for some reason beneficial.
      1. 0
        April 23 2018 21: 27
        Quote: Mestny
        True, the US military has a much more cautious opinion.

        And rightly so. To fight them, not warlike congressmen and talking heads
  7. +5
    April 20 2018 12: 16
    The US is convinced that all missiles launched at targets in Syria hit targets

    you will not praise yourself, no one will praise ... wink
  8. +3
    April 20 2018 12: 16
    That is, they claim that they destroyed 3 objects using 100 missiles and where is the effectiveness here, it Failed that for this they needed 100 missiles
    1. +4
      April 20 2018 12: 51
      Quote: MIG00001
      That is, they claim that they destroyed 3 objects using 100 missiles and where is the effectiveness here, it Failed that for this they needed 100 missiles

      It would be a failure if the objects were not destroyed, and the redundancy of funds is a reserve in case of opposition, which did not happen.
      1. +3
        April 20 2018 12: 55
        Quote: Puncher
        Quote: MIG00001
        That is, they claim that they destroyed 3 objects using 100 missiles and where is the effectiveness here, it Failed that for this they needed 100 missiles

        It would be a failure if the objects were not destroyed, and the redundancy of funds is a reserve in case of opposition, which did not happen.

        It’s a failure how many current cases they will need missiles for a real war when there are more targets
        1. 0
          April 20 2018 13: 03
          Quote: MIG00001
          how many current cases they will need missiles for a real war when there are more goals

          Do they have a lot of missiles, or are you in doubt?
          1. +1
            April 23 2018 07: 07
            Well, let's say not so much. And the point is different. If we proceed from the fact that expensive point weapons are used as simple bombs, then this is at least idiocy and most likely just a lie for the layman.
          2. 0
            April 23 2018 12: 27
            That is, in your opinion, their entire supply of Tomahawks is designed to defeat only a hundred targets? M-d ...
          3. 0
            April 27 2018 13: 47
            Quote: Puncher
            Quote: MIG00001
            how many current cases they will need missiles for a real war when there are more goals

            Do they have a lot of missiles, or are you in doubt?

            No, it’s just that if we need it, we can increase the number when the question arises by the edge, it’s another matter whether they will be able to fight off our calibers just as efficiently as it happened that the United States mainly focuses on offensive weapons
      2. 0
        April 20 2018 14: 07
        Quote: Puncher
        redundancy of funds is the stock in case of opposition,

        In this case, 1,5 million each rocket.
    2. 0
      April 23 2018 21: 28
      You did not take into account that the missiles are precision. Apparently the part of the window panes, where they were supposed to go, were closed
  9. 0
    April 20 2018 12: 17
    Syrians to collect all the remnants of rockets fired by the coalition, transfer to Russia, and to us, with the help of bulldozers to throw these remnants over the fence of the stripes embassy in Moscow))) Here you have the evidence.
    1. +2
      April 20 2018 12: 51
      Well so what is the problem, maybe in the absence thereof?
      1. 0
        April 20 2018 12: 55
        Maybe yes. Time will tell. In the meantime, there is nothing to crush the water in the mortar.
      2. 0
        April 21 2018 16: 26
        Quote: Puncher
        Well so what is the problem, maybe in the absence thereof?

        And you try to imagine the operation "with the help of a bulldozer to throw the remaining rockets through the fence." You can’t damage the fence, can you? Or is it supposed to clear the passage from the remains of the fence to the width of the remains of the rocket using the blade of a bulldozer? And to push them into the territory of the USA again with the help of a dozer blade? Bulldozer S-180? Or customize Hitachi? Or is a front-end loader a "bulldozer type"?
  10. 0
    April 20 2018 12: 18
    Well, that this beauty is offended - that they ordered. then blurted out. In addition, now the West is trending for a lie for any reason, if only it would be against Russia. After all, this lie is for the mericans themselves, and the whole world understands where the lie is.
  11. 0
    April 20 2018 12: 23
    Quote: aszzz888
    Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White said during a briefing

    Another Pentagon talking doll, with sawdust instead of brains ... laughing

    It reminded me of the Soviet cartoon Winnie the Pooh, when he sang: "I have sawdust in my head"
  12. +1
    April 20 2018 12: 25
    This dark-skinned girl was specially set up so that it wouldn’t be visible how he blushes from his own lies? Although they hardly know the word SHAME.))
  13. +1
    April 20 2018 12: 27
    who will alter whom?
  14. ZVS
    0
    April 20 2018 12: 28
    A good Pentagon mine with a bad game. ))))))))))
  15. +1
    April 20 2018 12: 30
    They lie at every turn, because they have nothing left to do.
  16. +5
    April 20 2018 12: 32
    if, in response, you stomp on Israel with the same 100 missiles, no matter what kind of smart though stupid, then everything will immediately fall into place - and where only the swagger of the Jews will disappear
  17. +3
    April 20 2018 12: 34
    Ehhh, what is hellish hellish? (
    Zrada damn it ...
    Oh, the rare systems of Syria that were delivered back to the USSR many times cooler than our modern ones
    modern ...
    And it's still funny to hear from a Negro whose name is White)
  18. +3
    April 20 2018 12: 35
    The conclusion is this: they have excellent systems for delivering the first strike. Anyone with excellent air defense systems must deliver a preemptive strike, otherwise ...
  19. +1
    April 20 2018 12: 44
    What is your head warm? Our cause is right! Victory will be ours! More I.V. Stalin announced! And he knew a lot about victories!
  20. +3
    April 20 2018 12: 50
    maybe they are right mattresses? why do not they show on TV the remnants of downed 70 missiles ..? fragments ....
    1. 0
      April 23 2018 21: 32
      Already shown. Not 70, but shown.
  21. 0
    April 20 2018 12: 51
    "Z" - envy
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. 0
    April 20 2018 12: 55
    this is exactly like auto-training; all missiles were shot down; the wc-wc was destroyed, but the mestizo did not give in and convinced Trump not to shoot at the bases of the russian federation. how many of a hundred missiles were intended for 2 bases? I'm already starting to think about the inferiority of amercocos.
  24. +5
    April 20 2018 12: 56
    Patriots have the same text.
    1. Almost all mention of sawdust in the speaker’s head
    2. The woman prompts the speaker with the text, and her skin color is necessarily mentioned, probably for patriots this is important
    3. Well, everyone writes about complete lies.
    Do they think alike because the way of thinking is identical, or dictate to them, too, on a piece of paper?
    1. +2
      April 20 2018 13: 18
      Quote: Puncher
      Do they think alike because the way of thinking is identical, or dictate to them, too, on a piece of paper?

      The TV dictates to them: fix-price-all for 70, 70 turnout, 70% for, here are 70% of missiles. People do not bother.
    2. 0
      April 20 2018 14: 12
      Quote: Puncher
      They think alike because the way of thinking is identical.

      The main thing is that patriots have thinking (as well as an image).
      Unlike the unpatriots.
      1. +1
        April 20 2018 15: 16
        Quote: Norma
        The main thing is that patriots have thinking (as well as an image).

        And the uniformity of thinking is due to one level iq value of the exam score?
        1. 0
          April 23 2018 21: 37
          Quote: Puncher
          And the uniformity of thinking is due to one level iq value of the exam score?

          Due to a single assessment of the event. If you see a camel, then no matter what your IQ, or the exam score, you will still call it a camel. Although, you can apply other words, but I already got burned, applied a different word and the administrator punished me, although I entered the ellipsis
  25. BAI
    +2
    April 20 2018 12: 59
    But why do air defense against such missiles? Does anyone see anything military in the place where it falls?
    1. +5
      April 20 2018 13: 23
      White Nights ? where does the plot come from? C. Gases? hi
  26. +1
    April 20 2018 13: 03
    The lie, it turns out, can compensate for the "mind" of the Tomahawks.
  27. +5
    April 20 2018 13: 04
    Animals, they wanted to poison people, thinking that in Syria, where they struck, there are chemical weapons. Any person knows, and even more so the military must know that if you bomb the warehouse, then a poisonous cloud will rise, which can go far poisoning all living things. They are criminals, and they boast that they attacked a country that is fighting terrorism. fool
    1. 0
      April 20 2018 14: 17
      Quote: bumerang.
      thinking that in Syria where they struck there are chemical weapons.

      And you relate to them better than it is accepted now. That is, do you assume these ... make sense?
      Sense and total lie are not compatible, however.
  28. +1
    April 20 2018 13: 08
    Quote: vorobey
    Intrigue is growing ..

    No intrigues - everything is simple:
    Conclusion: invisible missiles that hit invisible targets were hit by an invisible missile defense. Bottom line: Israel won feel !
    everyone is happy. everyone is smiling. laughing full rezmoga and all conversation
  29. +1
    April 20 2018 13: 12
    Well, what should they say: "Dear taxpayers! The missiles for which you gave the money are actually ... Too smart! Because they don’t want to die!"
  30. +1
    April 20 2018 13: 15
    We are waiting for the show of our evidence. until it’s really not clear who is lying.
  31. +1
    April 20 2018 13: 17
    Missile defense systems produced by Russia were completely ineffective

    When you really want to sell to the Turks and Qatars - Patriots, and they rest against laughing
  32. 0
    April 20 2018 13: 20
    This dance lasts so long around with tambourines - when it is already decided to send each other a nuclear root ?! Boredom, not news. I’ll go check the bunker ...
    1. 0
      April 20 2018 14: 44
      In this case, the bunker will not save ... But the "survivors" of various kinds do not believe in it. Pichalka ...
  33. +3
    April 20 2018 13: 24
    This briefing is nothing more than an attempt to save the portfolio of orders for American weapons, which now has become much more difficult to match their "partners". Stupidity also lies in the fact that the mattresses themselves fuel interest in their failure.
  34. +4
    April 20 2018 13: 30
    Chamber No. 6 at the exit. Such yes with nuclear weapons is a threat to the World, Planet and Humanity, and if they are also released into Space, then to the whole Universe.
    It can be seen after September 11, 2001 the tower ... they all completely completely demolished.
  35. +2
    April 20 2018 13: 30
    usa screwed up project igil closes
  36. +3
    April 20 2018 13: 32
    Their goal was simply to shoot down 71 rockets fired by Syrian air defense. laughing
  37. +2
    April 20 2018 13: 35
    It reminds me of something .... Interview with a US hockey player at the Korean Olympics. "It was an equal game." Heh heh heh 4-0, of course equal. There, the campaign is all so repulsed.
  38. +3
    April 20 2018 13: 38
    if we (air defense) are scolded by enemies it’s good am
    Now, if praised then? hi
  39. +2
    April 20 2018 13: 50
    A new breed has been discovered in America - the balabol hawk! Aggressive, but only in words!))))
    1. 0
      April 20 2018 14: 21
      Quote: Serving_fatherland
      balabol hawk!

      And black.
      the general is clearly there to neutralize.
      so that stupidity does not go wild.
  40. +1
    April 20 2018 13: 52
    Comrades, look at this Pentagon representative and everything becomes clear - the intellect shines on her dark face, and this is not looking at her surname - White (White .... laughing ) ... so they basically fight, the main principle is SHOW !!!!!
  41. 0
    April 20 2018 13: 57
    Is this monkey versed in air defense systems?
    1. 0
      April 20 2018 15: 00
      It’s sad that the monkey itself, now the president of the United States, is stuffed with playing games that can develop into nuclear collapse. I think he is mentally ill.
  42. +1
    April 20 2018 14: 04
    Only practice will show the truth. When it comes down to business. In the meantime, only a complete clowning ...
    1. 0
      April 20 2018 14: 29
      So much more practice for air defense than in the last year in Syria?
      The media always clown around when every time they try to create an appearance of victory out of an intimidation.
  43. 0
    April 20 2018 14: 11
    No need to react. Specialists in different countries have already assessed what happened and made the right conclusions. I hope the next stage of hysteria sounds like "not a single ship is sunk" ...
  44. 0
    April 20 2018 14: 13
    Negro with the name Belaya-spec! on Russian air defense systems
    1. 0
      April 20 2018 15: 19
      Quote: Charik
      LITTLE WOMAN

      Are you embarrassed by the fact that a black woman may be a specialist in air defense systems? You simply accentuated her racial affiliation.
      1. 0
        April 20 2018 15: 22
        same as goograf psaki
      2. 0
        April 23 2018 12: 39
        Do you feel like a fighter with racism?
  45. 0
    April 20 2018 14: 48
    Of course, I don’t know how many missiles there in real life shot down air defense in Syria, but I don’t believe these statements of the Americans ...
  46. +2
    April 20 2018 16: 44
    and your two racquets flew into Moscow
  47. +2
    April 20 2018 17: 24
    "Russia falsely claimed that the Syrian missile defense shot down a large number of missiles, whereas in reality we hit all our targets." Substitution, inconsistent in the meaning of the statement. If there was one missile for each target, then yes, the second part refutes the first. And if there are three goals, and 120 missiles with the number of traces of hits less than 30, then both sends are correct
  48. 0
    April 20 2018 18: 31
    Let them comfort themselves, this is at hand for us. They have a star-sick disease. Sooner or later, sobering will come. drinks
  49. +1
    April 20 2018 22: 32
    Of the ground-based missiles launched by the regime of [President of Syria] Bashar al-Assad, almost all were fired after the last of our missiles hit the target.
    That pushed it. Right at the dissertation level. laughing
  50. +1
    April 20 2018 22: 57
    However, I can say that the Syrian air defense systems, which were fully manufactured in Russia, developed there and supported by the Russian military, were actively used, but were ineffective. - Well done, Mackenzie! A soldier who lies to himself is a wonderful opponent.
  51. 0
    April 21 2018 01: 43
    Two monkeys. Just like a circus
  52. The comment was deleted.
  53. 0
    April 22 2018 19: 19
    Blessed is he who believes. Even if you pee in their eyes, it’s all God’s dew. And there is no need to convince them. Let them continue in the same spirit. It will be easier for us to fight them.
  54. +2
    April 22 2018 20: 06
    Having called themselves “mug, get into the back”, so they will pronounce their entire “alphabet”... it would be strange if we recognized the effectiveness of Syrian air defense...
  55. 0
    April 22 2018 23: 43
    Classics, however. Krylov, Fox and Grapes.
  56. The comment was deleted.
  57. 0
    April 23 2018 13: 56
    And I would doubt that there was any shooting at all.. Past footage showed..
  58. The comment was deleted.
  59. +1
    April 23 2018 18: 34
    It is very doubtful that this scarecrow in a skirt would understand those things that would be more complicated than a blender manual.
  60. +1
    April 23 2018 20: 42
    Soviet, not Russian missiles. And not just Soviet, but Soviet 60s versus “modern, smart and beautiful”
  61. +1
    April 23 2018 23: 38
    I wonder what they will come up with when the aircraft carriers go to the bottom? a whirlpool, a quiet whirlpool, a natural ocean anomaly..?
  62. +1
    April 24 2018 07: 33
    More than a hundred tamahawks on three targets is 33+ missiles per target. I think that you will not find cases in history where at least 10-15 units were launched at one target, and if you do, pay attention to the size of these targets, and here is a pharmacological center and two “sheds” in the desert. And if everything is as rosy as the Pentagon claims, then where did the Russians get two of these same missiles???
  63. The comment was deleted.
  64. 0
    April 24 2018 17: 14
    If there was something wrong, the Yankees would have squealed long ago and played videos of their great victories around the clock. Judging by the fact that there is no video and victories are also not viewed.
  65. The comment was deleted.
  66. 0
    April 25 2018 07: 55
    Why was it necessary to replicate this, I’m not afraid to say, complete nonsense...
  67. 0
    April 28 2018 08: 19
    Where are your Tomahawks good for?
    During the previous attack, the entire destroyer was unable to fire a single missile and was urgently replaced with a spare!
    But the spare one also screwed up so much that half of the missiles flew off to God knows where!
    So it’s not a fact that out of the last hundred released, at least half could crawl to their targets!
    Or are you just throwing away junk from 1982?
  68. 0
    April 28 2018 09: 59
    Another lying monkey.