Marine drones will be hidden in containers

For the Russian Navy, a container complex system is being developed, which will include an autonomous, unmanned underwater vehicle (AUV) and its control facilities, according to News.

The system is designed to be placed on warships and auxiliary ships of the Navy.

According to the newspaper, the basis of the complex will be the ANPA of the “Harpsichord” family, developed by the Rubin Central Design Bureau together with the Institute of Marine Technology Problems of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

“The container with the" Harpsichord "can be placed directly on the deck of the ship - for example, an icebreaker or a rescue ship. Upon arrival in the operational area, a regular ship crane will lower the drone into the water, and he will start work, ”writes the publication with reference to the military department.

Externally, the “Harpsichord-1Р” resembles a torpedo with a length of about 6-meters and a diameter of just under one meter. Weight - about two and a half tons. The range is up to 300 km, the battery life is 120 hours, the working depth is up to 6 thousand meters. It is equipped with side-scan sonar, electromagnetic finder, digital video system, acoustic profilograph for searching objects at the bottom and other equipment.

Unmanned submarines can be used for reconnaissance, protection, clearance of fairways, and protection of ports. They also make it easier to cope with the task of detecting enemy submarines or underwater vehicles. Most likely, at first, marine drones will be primarily engaged in reconnaissance and demining. They may also be useful for servicing the network of underwater stations that is currently being created in the Arctic,

Vadim Kozyulin, director of the PIR Center project on new technologies and international security, told the newspaper.

Comments

[210ox]

Yes, you can hide ICBMs in a container ..

[AL176STM30]

Damn, took off the tongue. In these containers what you want can be hidden ...

[NIKNN]

Quote: AL176STM30

Marine drones will be hidden in containers

Marine drones will be hidden in containers

There are already "Clabs" in containers ... And who said that our Navy is weaker than the US Navy ... Each seiner is a combat unit, and a container ship can be equated to a naval base in general. Only here the fish is getting more expensive, probably there aren’t enough seiners, everyone mobilized ...

[vorobey]

Quote: 210ox

Yes, you can hide ICBMs in a container ..

mbr in container, container on deck, fishing seiner deck .. port of registry Kerch ..

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: vorobey

Quote: 210ox

Yes, you can hide ICBMs in a container ..

mbr in container, container on deck, fishing seiner deck .. port of registry Kerch ..

These things can be everywhere ..

[Hole puncher]

Quote: 210ox

Yes, you can hide ICBMs in a container ..

yeah, the tanker is called

[aszzz888]

It is also easier for them to cope with the task of detecting enemy submarines or underwater vehicles. Most likely, at first, sea drones will primarily be engaged in reconnaissance

Another smut of the merikatos! Now the pentagonists will require additional loot to counter ...

[Hole puncher]

Quote: aszzz888

Another smut of the merikatos!

And what does the smut consist of?

[aszzz888]

Puncher (Eugene) Today, 11: 44 And ​​what does the smut consist of?

I propose to think for yourself.

[rotmistr60]

What can a hole puncher think about? He is not aware that on any ship, incl. civilian, you can place an underwater drone, which for Americans is not clear what, and most importantly where it can do underwater.

[Sands Careers General]

And there you can hide the core-loaf))

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: Sands Career General

And there you can hide the core-loaf))

"Kuzkin mother" and further obscene names of our weapons of retaliation..he heh

[Sands Careers General]

I represent the detonated farts of the Pentagon, who learned about piles of underwater drones with a depth of immersion of up to 6 thousand meters from nuclear weapons around the United States)))

[kvarfax]

and now remember the recent presentation on nuclear-powered underwater drones. Who said that there cannot be such drones in containers?))

[Sands Careers General]

That's it, I'm talking about the same))

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: Sands Career General

I represent the detonated farts of the Pentagon, who learned about piles of underwater drones with a depth of immersion of up to 6 thousand meters from nuclear weapons around the United States)))

In the days of the USSR, many such things were decomposed .. Sakharov himself suggested that US torpedoes bombard, etc. And one general called him a bloodthirsty maniac for this plan!

[Sands Careers General]

R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
That’s good, if any, is a deterrence weapon, not an attack.

[alstr]

Now it remains to adapt such a thing in the submarine in a commercial quantity and get target designation tools for our anti-ship missiles.

[Heterocapsa]

Straight from the Arctic from an icebreaker .America has not yet caught up with hypersound and then drones. Oh, this is a regional power.

[NEXUS]

I think they will put harpsichords not only on icebreakers, but also on all naval warships. The device is compact, very necessary and very versatile in its application.

[aszzz888]

NEXUS (Andrey) Today, 11: 39 New
I think that harpsichords will be put not only on icebreakers,but also to all warships of the fleets. The device is compact, very necessary and very versatile in its application.

There is reason to believe that this is what our commanders are planning ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: aszzz888

There is reason to believe that this is what our commanders are planning ...

Harpsichord is a wild crap for the NATO nuclear submarines and AUG, because it can be used both as a scout, and as an attack system, and as a search complex. At the same time, I am more than sure that our submarines are already equipped with Harpsichord.

[22 dmdc]

If only Siluyanov and the Gaidar gang would not intervene again. Plan 2020 is on its way to the right. Soon it will be - 2050.

[Hole puncher]

Placement of NAPL in a container is a global trend allowing abandonment of minesweeper class ships. It's not a disguise, but the versatility of use. Now, any ship (suitable displacement) can optionally become a minesweeper.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Puncher

It's not a disguise, but the versatility of use. Now, any ship (suitable displacement) can optionally become a minesweeper.

Not only versatility, but also mobility. When our AS-28 was rescued in Kamchatka, the British Scorpion was delivered to the base by plane and mounted on a killer - and one day after departure it was already working. The nearest specialized rescue vessel with a "stationary" rescue device was three days' journey.

[seregatara1969]

right in the sea forty foot - no one will find

[Viktor Petrov]

And here to hide, the container on the deck wakes up already implies the presence of a deep-sea vehicle, probably if necessary they will be thrown by plane to the desired area, and the AUV will not be tied strictly to one ship. In a word, the mobile complex wakes up.

[Viktor Petrov]

AUVA carriers have already been deployed in Gadzhievo; NATO is now 10 years behind at least.