Everyone recognizes him. Bad good Walther P.38

153
Walther P.38 pistol is one of those pistols that are firmly in history recognizable even by people who are not interested in gunshot weapons. This gun not only went through the Second World War, but was also used for a long time after its completion. Walther P.38 has both an army of fans and those who consider this weapon to be one of the worst designs by Walther designers. There was even a joke, about 8 warning shots and one accurate throw, describing this gun as a weapon is not the most accurate. Let's try to get acquainted with this gun in more detail and try to impartially assess its strengths and weaknesses.

Brief history of creating a pistol Walther P.38



Like any weapon that subsequently becomes widespread, the Walther P.38 pistol did not appear out of the blue; it was preceded by a series of pistols of less successful designs. The designers of the company Walther have set themselves the task - to create a gun simpler and cheaper than the R. 08 of Georg Luger. From a technical point of view, the task was more than simple, since the P08 pistol was a difficult and expensive weapon, but there was one catch.

Everyone recognizes him. Bad good Walther P.38


This snag was the characteristics of the Luger pistol, which far from all designs could compete with. But even that was not the main problem. The main problem was that the military were very much attached to R.08 and in order to force them to change this pistol to another it was necessary to do something, at least not worse, or to count on a successful coincidence of circumstances.

The first designs of Walther pistols, which were to replace the Р08, were very far from ideal. For some reason, the designers decided to move in a direction that was obviously wrong. The main mistake of designers was the idea of ​​creating a pistol chambered for 9x19 with automatics, built on the use of recoil energy with the free course of the shutter.



The result of the movement in this direction was the pistol, which very much resembled an enlarged and significantly weighted version of the Walther PP pistol. Of course, such a weapon could not satisfy even the most modest requirements and it did not go into mass production. With this gun started a little confusion in the notation, as it was named Walther MP (Militarpistole), this designation was used for subsequent samples, which were based on the automatic system with a free gate. The first two versions of the MP pistol did not differ in principle; the third version was already different; its trigger was a trigger mechanism with a hidden trigger.

Despite all the efforts, to bring the design of the latest version of the pistol to acceptable indicators of durability and reliability and attempts to reduce the weight of the weapon, it did not bring any fruit. It soon became clear that the automation system with a free gate could not be implemented in the gun, powered by the relatively powerful cartridge 9x19, at the proper level, with those technical advances that were available at that time. As time has shown, the use of such an automation system is possible in pistols, but it has its own nuances; the most famous example of such weapons is the Hexler und Koch VP70 pistol.



It is worth noting that other experimental models of pistols are mentioned with the designation of the MP, the automation of which was no longer on the free course of the shutter, but that it was specifically for the weapon, there is no reliable data.

In the process of searching for a workable automation system that would be distinguished by reliability and simplicity, Fritz Bartlemens proposed his own development, which later became the basis for the weapon that we now know under the designation Walther P.38.

The main idea of ​​the design was to improve the automation system with a short stroke, proposed by Browning. But the main advantage of his development was the design of the barrel stroke, which now moved strictly in a straight line, without bias when unlocking the barrel bore. This was achieved by introducing into the design of a kind of latch, which, when moving backward, interacted with the rod and removed the barrel and bolt group from the clutch.



Based on this design, the next gun was developed, which was proposed by the military. This gun already had the designation AR. The weapon was rejected by the military due to the fact that the trigger in the gun was hidden, apparently considered such a decision is not safe enough. After changing this “flaw”, the weapon was again proposed to the military, with the new HP designation. The trigger mechanism of the second version of the MP pistol was used in it. This gun was already practically Walther P.38 and after changing a few minor details was put into service in the 1940 year.



It should be noted that before the adoption of weapons, these weapons with the name HP could be found on the shelves of gun shops, and the gun was offered not only in the version for 9x19 cartridges, but also for .32 ASR .38 Super Auto munitions. It is mentioned that the weapon under this designation was made up to 45 of the year, and even if this is true, it is obvious that the volumes were very small, since all the enterprises, especially those involved in the production of weapons, worked exclusively for military purposes, and not commercial.

By the way, there is one little-known fact about this weapon. This gun was adopted by the army of Sweden under the designation М39, but never appeared in the army. Before the start of World War II, Walther P.38 won the competition for the new pistol of the Swedish army, where a little more than 1,500 units of this weapon were sent. However, the beginning of the war made its own adjustments and Sweden had to abandon the gun and adopt the Husqvarna M / 40.

Many Facets P.38

Despite the fact that there are not so many variants of the Walther P.38 pistol, you can find quite a large number of weapons under this designation, which, although it will not differ in its design, will differ in quality and individual parts.



Since the army constantly needed weapons, the production of Walther P.38 pistols was not only deployed at the company's production facilities, the Mauser plants were connected to the production, where they were removed from the production of R.08, and R.38 was preferred. In addition, a significant number of pistols were produced at Spreewerke plants from 1942 of the year. Differences in manufacturers and the ever-increasing demands in terms of production inevitably affected the quality of the weapon, which, perhaps, was the cause of some hostility to this gun for many. It is quite expected that when a person takes a new pistol in his hands and from the very beginning he begins to notice shortcomings in the processing, and later also failures in the operation of individual nodes, he forms a strong opinion about the weapon and it will be clearly not positive. The most frequent occurrence characterizing the drop in quality during large-scale production was the operation of the safety device. When the fuse was turned on, the drummer was blocked, and it all worked when each gun was given enough attention at the factory. Military samples of the middle of the Second World War could not boast of high quality, which can be seen even in the quality of processing the outer surfaces of weapons. As a result of a drop in the quality of production, the drummer, after a brief use of the weapon, has already ceased to be firmly blocked when the fuse is turned on. As a result of this, the trigger, hitting it, led to a shot. By the way, did someone say something about TT?



The deployment of large-scale production for the ever-growing needs of the military led even to the fact that only within the walls of Walther P.38 from the very beginning of production, some nodes changed. For example, the first one and a half thousand Walther P.38 pistols had an ejector hidden in the casing, and after the release of almost five thousand pistols, the drummer’s shaft, which had been changed from square to round, was changed.

If we talk about the quality of the weapon, depending on where it was produced, it will be absolutely incorrect. Germans, after all, are always Germans, even when they are forced to rush. The difference in quality is most likely observed depending on the time when this or that gun was produced. For this reason, it is often possible to find the opinion that pistols made at Spreewerke’s factories were of lower quality, but they started producing pistols only in the 1942 year, and the production speed was significantly higher than that of Walther and Mauser.

For comparison, here are a few numbers. Since 1939, Walther has released about 475 thousands of Walther P.38 pistols. Mauser turned to production at the end of 1941, and produced 300 thousands. Production at Spreewerke’s factories was launched only in 1942, and until the end of the war, the company launched 275 with thousands of Walther P.38 pistols.

It is possible to distinguish weapons of different manufacturers by stamps, good, in this case, everything is simple and clear to the limit. The first 13 of thousands of Walther pistols can be recognized by the presence of a well-known logo - an image of a tape with the name of a company written on it. These 13000 pistols are also called "zero" series, since the serial numbers of the weapons started from scratch. In the middle of the 1940 of the year, the coding of the names of factories producing military products was introduced, the Walther plant received the digital designation 480, which was applied to the housing-slide instead of the company logo. By the end of 1940, the designation changed again, now letters were used instead of numbers, the letters AC were fixed to Walter, which changed the number of 480s on the casing-gate.

Mauser pistols are easily recognizable by three letters byf, but there is a small amount of weapons with a different designation - svw. This designation was introduced in the 1945 year. Spreewerke pistols were marked with svq.



As mentioned earlier, Walther P.38 pistol versions are not many. If you take only the war period, you can select the full version of Walther P.38 and with a shortened barrel. There may be some confusion, a shortened version of the Walther P.38 pistol was also produced in the post-war period, but visually pistols with the designation P.38К are easily distinguishable from the military and postwar - from a weapon that was produced for the needs of the Gestapo; in the full-size version of the weapon on the barrel. Post-war options had the location of the front sight on the cover-bolt.



After the war, the Walther P.38 pistol continued its service, albeit under the name Р1. The only difference between this weapon and its predecessor was the frame made of aluminum alloy. Interestingly, the pistols, which were produced for export, still had the designation P. 38. Subsequently, the P4 pistol appeared, which shortened the barrel and improved the safety mechanism; on its basis, the R.38K pistol was made once again.

Despite the fact that the latest version of the Walther P.38 pistol was removed from service in 1981, the production of weapons for export continued until the end of the twentieth century.

But that’s not the end of the pistol. Since these weapons have left their mark on history, many enthusiasts continue to work with them. Of course, we are not talking about producing Walther P.38 on our own, but the result of this work is still of interest. So, most often, pistols of the military period are taken and, by eliminating the shortcomings of mass production, they are brought to an ideal working capacity and an attractive appearance for a spoiled consumer.

An example of such work can serve as Walther P.38 pistols after revision by John Murtz. One of the variants of his pistols dubbed Baby P38, by analogy with the "pocket" pistols of the early twentieth century. In the version of the weapon presented in the photo, the barrel was shortened, to the Gestapo variant, the coating of the outer surfaces was changed, the handle was shortened and the pad was replaced, the shortcomings of the mass production weapons on the internal parts were eliminated.



Many of these results of work are negative, because the weapon loses its historical value, but there is not a single person who would not recognize that the end result is definitely more presentable than what was taken as a basis.

By the way, from the hands of the Master "suffered" and R.08, which can now be found in the form of a carbine with a long barrel and a fixed butt. But back to the pistol Walther P.38, in its original version.

Walther P.38 pistol design

As mentioned above, the basis for the design of the Walther P.38 pistol was an automation system with a short barrel stroke and locking the barrel bore, swinging in a vertical plane with a latch. Interestingly, a system of protection against an accidental shot was implemented. External switch fuse blocked when turning on the drummer, respectively, the trigger during the descent could not move it. In addition, the design was introduced another detail that protects the weapon from a premature shot, before locking the barrel. A spring-loaded part was stretched through the entire breech of the weapon, which when it closed the casing-breech rested against the bottom of the sleeve and pressed into the casing of the breech. The movement of this part back led to the unlocking of the drummer, in addition, it was also used as a pointer to the presence of a cartridge in the chamber.



Despite the apparent simplicity of the design of the gun, the weapon turned out to be clearly overloaded with small elements that performed a single function. Yes, the gun turned out to be simpler and cheaper to manufacture than R.08, but by modern standards the production of such a pistol would be unreasonably difficult, without obvious advantages in the form of higher performance compared with competitors or low prices.



To be objective, this gun finally lost its relevance as a military weapon back in the 50s of the last century, since by that time there appeared a lot of cheaper options, both in production and on the counter.

How bad is Walther P.38?

You do not need to search for a long time to find people unflatteringly respond to these weapons. There are really a lot of negative reviews and mostly they concern weapons of wartime release and Р1. In the first case, everything is explained by a decrease in the quality of production due to the large volumes of weapons produced in a short time. In principle, any weapon with a design consisting of many small details in such conditions will not be of the best quality.

If we talk about the P1 pistol, then it is obvious that some of the weapons were made by replacing the frame of the pistols produced during World War II, and it is unlikely that someone paid attention to the quality of individual components, which led to undesirable consequences.



The very design of the gun, as shown by the work of enthusiasts who brought the military models to perfection, is quite workable, it just does not maintain a low level of production. It is completely incorrect to draw conclusions based on traumatic, signal and, especially, pneumatic pistols.

A good Walther P.38 pistol or a bad one is hard to say. For its time, the weapon turned out to be really excellent, although not adapted for production in wartime. Since the pistol did not have a chance to develop at a fast pace into a simpler design, and the quality of production undermined its credibility, Walther P.38 left its mark on history, but did not become equal to other more successful pistol models.

Sources:
zonwar.ru
fastmarksman.ru
modernfirearms.net
phoenixinvestmentarms.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

153 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 24 2018 15: 13
    There was an opportunity to twist this pistol in the hands of MMG, was horrified by the abundance of milling work in the production of the barrel.
    1. +8
      April 24 2018 15: 28
      Alas, we can only twist mmg sad and law-abiding in our country request so the next 6 years and not foreseen sad
      1. +16
        April 24 2018 17: 08

        This is the answer to the "prohibitions," as you put it
        In Argentina, in gun shops you can often find this gun, and other rarities.
        It will be necessary to ask permission and take a picture of the window and put it here.
        1. +1
          April 25 2018 15: 00
          Why take a picture? Won 600 dollars in Wisconsin. No one is buying. I might have bought it before but now I won’t buy it. Beliefs with me .. After the revival of Ukrovermaht. At the head of which are the Jews. How to put it in one safe with TT with which my grandfather Alexander reached Berlin? No, let these pieces of iron roll around.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +6
      April 24 2018 15: 32
      In general, it is absurd to allow powerful 366 and other rifles with a lanster drill and prohibit a cop that can be easily tracked sad Pechalka fellow
    3. +13
      April 24 2018 15: 47
      I shot from the P-38 1942 release. An ordinary German machine, very average, is much worse than Luger in his hand. TT is much more accurate and aiming range is higher. But almost all German products are zealously advertised even today, right up to the guarantee * of a million shots *.
      1. +2
        April 24 2018 15: 50
        Well, you see, something did not rush to shoot left and right, as our prohibitions like to yell smile
      2. +10
        April 24 2018 16: 52
        The Baltic states and Transnistria have weapons in their hands. I saw assault rifles, rifles and pistols. All legally. There, by the way, in the villages and on the roads there are practically no robbers. Fear.
        But in RUSSIA, bandits in the countryside, however, like on the roads, graze without hesitation and the policemen are not a hindrance to them.
        1. +8
          April 24 2018 17: 02
          Are we still about 100 years old, we need to wait when it comes to the hoplophobes and prohibitions that it’s not guns that are dangerous request
          1. +13
            April 24 2018 18: 23
            It’s not guns that are dangerous, self-defenders, survivors and other short-barreled fans who believe that as soon as they buy a gun, those around them will immediately begin to consider them men. And from whom this gun will take away the punks in the nearest gateway just saying: "Boo!"
            It’s dangerous not only that they will start selling the short barrel, but it’s scary that they will immediately arm the punks easily by selecting their characters described above. Now it’s unrealistic to meet a gopnik with a barrel, but it will be different. Actually, exactly the same thing happened with the gundonostrel - earlier it was enough for me to have gas for almost 100% protection, but with the proliferation of gundonostrel that the punks took away from men I stopped wearing because there was a chance of getting a shot in the stomach. With the permission of the COP, the shot will become fatal.
            1. +10
              April 24 2018 19: 19
              here you are right for all 100 .. I personally took the fool's injuries ... and I watched several races how they were taken away .. in principle, I think that at the moment our people are not ready for this .. they’ll shoot in all directions and get drunk and the drivers on the roads .. now I’ll say it for myself .. an imaginary situation- there is a hooker in front of me and barks, for example, I don’t see an opponent in it, the hooker begs in the face .. let go of my pendal or slap a little bit on the nose to calm down .. similar situations were repeatedly and everything ended without heavy bodily .. and those I believe this situation is the same, but at the same time I know that every second stingray has a fighting trunk, of course I’ll beat so that I don’t get up, I’ll finish off already lying so that it’s not that I didn’t get up and that I wouldn’t remember me after the hospital ... lovers of trunks and harsh reality are for you .. people are not ready for this .. yes time will pass and society will get used to say so merge with armed brothers but more than one year will pass and tens if not hundreds of thousands of people will be killed or crippled .. and I just sure that most of them will not be criminals ..
            2. +5
              April 25 2018 00: 52
              How scary to live laughing but I wondered when the supporter appeared, everything would be taken away from you; it’s terrible and other nonsense, apparently they like to judge by themselves lol My friend calmly carries a tiger. I didn’t see that he was trying to take the trunk from him. laughing and yes, he, too, for cop, he must show him what fairy tales inventors are inventing laughing
              1. +3
                April 25 2018 01: 05
                Well, I had a Tiger, now I have SCS, SVT, and on the weekend there will be PCA, I recently found out that it turns out to be quite a bit worth it. Of course, this is not counting smooth. This somehow cancels the fact that the average fan of the short-barreled legolase loader doesn’t matter what kind of physique, but is sufficiently life-saving, believing that having a COP will immediately make him a man and begin to respect him. The example of the handguns again before my eyes - talk to the police how many took them.
                And so for the remark, and gopot need SVD in the hunting version? We don’t go to business without snipers ;-)
                Our hunters calmly carry millions of long smooth and rifled but neither the authorities nor the militia-police somehow strain on this score because the long barrel is not interesting for short-barrers who can easily take away weapons and most importantly is not interesting for the gopota that can do this.
                1. 0
                  April 25 2018 02: 02
                  So do not worry that he wants to put locks on the lock? and force to wear badges as suggested by deputy Nilov? winked
                  1. +4
                    April 25 2018 02: 20
                    In general, he doesn’t bother; nothing going beyond the duty hype and scandalous bills in honor of the transfer of permission to the Russian Guard is not expected. When we had similar changes without an IUD occurred.
                    And on Nilov’s account, let’s remember all the rest of the city’s crazy people, like the deputies of Milonov or Petrov. In fact, nothing but the correct changes in the quality of safes is expected.

                    Millions of those who wanted to have a weapon will have it, and the short-barrers, as they were whining, will whine about the fact that the government is afraid, etc. To give sniper rifles and semi-automatic versions of Kalashnikov into the hands of the people means not afraid, but afraid of pistols ;-)
                    And by the way, you can immediately see that you are far from weapons-related topics (well, apart from overworking in all kinds of forums), because USM blockers do not protect you from the fact that you’ll be taken away from the barrel or from what you supposedly go to the Maidan with it. This is protection against unauthorized access by family members, primarily children. How controversial this issue is relevant.
                    1. +1
                      April 25 2018 02: 57
                      Children do not know how to use a grinder or metal sheet? winked All these locks are for law-abiding citizens. wink And yes, if you don’t know what is happening on our civilian arms market, I’ll enlighten those who have money who don’t want to buy our products at all, explaining that they don’t want to buy trash at horse prices, those who don’t have money are looking for a resale or refuse to purchasing our products sad Given that the state defense order will end soon and the civilian arms market is practically undeveloped, it is easy to guess that a furry animal is creeping up to our arms companies and this cannot be alarming No. People now want high-quality products with high characteristics and at an affordable price, which is why they buy Chizo Sako Berreta and Remy and even the Norinko Company weapons when I ask the question why they answer directly tired of Kaklash and by the way they are ready to buy cops and the price doesn’t scare them, but from they shoot rid of rubber arrows massively and nobody is going to buy new ones, so in what is really happening on the ground you are obviously swimming, I advise you to communicate more often with people then you will be aware of what is happening
                      1. +3
                        April 25 2018 10: 30
                        You demonstrate that children do not know how to conduct a constructive discussion ;-) Just cite the blockers as an example of the power (sic!) Of the short-barreled legolase, and then skip over to the fact that the children can allegedly grind something out there with a grinder - it is a brain explosion.
                        And at the expense of the main one, it’s kind of softer, I really don’t care what your classmates are pushing for Berenty or Saco, there are statistics that the vast majority of civilian weapons in our domestic market (426,6 thousand out of 597 thousand). Moreover, the share over the past five years has increased significantly - compared with 2012, sales of imported weapons decreased by 48%, and domestic only by 6,6%. I don’t even want to comment on the ending state defense order, but the tendency of modern schoolchildren to discuss about what they don’t even have a foot is really incomprehensible to me. So for reference, just to ensure the educational process, our weapons factories supply ATGMs and MANPADS for money more than they can earn on cops with absolute legolase, because a gun for factories costs a penny. And considering that it is precisely in the plans to replace Makarov in the army with something more modern (like new machine guns and machine guns) it’s ridiculous to talk about the end of the defense order.
              2. 0
                April 25 2018 19: 31
                you can laugh as much as you like, but I have long noticed the pattern of acquiring and wearing injuries .. 1 as a rule very unsure men or poor and flawed cops always carry or carry injuries ... 2 many of my friends have injuries but they take them with them very rarely, as a rule, when they travel with family and children to the countryside, but they manage to carry damage for drinking and partying, and it is with them that they feel more confident and often get a biscuit for this confidence))) ) .. this formula doesn’t work with guys from the North Caucasus, an amazing thing I can’t understand — there are several guys of strong young strong Caucasian and with an injury .. a riddle !!!!
            3. +3
              April 25 2018 15: 25
              This is only part of the truth. And the complete truth is that having robbed and taking away the plane, the bandit will inevitably end his life cycle. Because pulling him out again they will shoot him inevitably. You see, one must know how to own a weapon, it’s like chess inclination, plus diligence and opportunity. Geeks of gangsters have no such qualities, neither diligence, skill nor patience. Therefore, they will begin to wave the ballot immediately. And they will be killed. All ... they will not have to be judged for about a dozen times, rolled into zones, because they have not yet been maimed for their worthless life. A gun in his hands is such a button to stop life, including his own. And just like that they don’t poke her. Just do not have to make a situation when the trail took copies of PM with a spray can. Because for how any even three times fair shot could be dragged through the courts. Before dismissal or jail. An example is when a friend of my romka, a beginner opera, was put in a leg by a scumbag for a shot while detaining a knife waving. And he died in the hospital. That tag nafer is not necessary.
            4. +1
              9 December 2020 22: 34
              Be afraid of wolves, don't go to the forest.
            5. 0
              2 January 2021 14: 22
              Why select OOOP? Gopniks are buying them quite legally. And they use it with ease in the certainty that they did not tolerate the skeleton of the flippers and be afraid to inform the authorities.
        2. +5
          April 24 2018 17: 43
          There are no robbers in Lithuania for other reasons, the short-barrels have nothing to do with it - the police and society supplanted it. But the main thing the whole gangster element went to Europe, where the production is fatter, - in Scandinavia, Spain is being traded ... They refused banditry in favor of drugs, prostitution, theft without murder and other mafia cases. But it’s not easy to get a cop in the Baltic states either, you need a bunch of certificates: from the police, medical facilities, characteristics from work and municipal, a safe for storage is required at home ... Further courses for a month and exams with representatives of the police and others (theory and practice) .. After you get at least a dozen cops and a smoothbore ... But when you type, you play enough (shooting only in licensed shooting ranges) you start to sell-buy (only through one state-owned enterprise) .. Wearing a cop is allowed only without a cartridge in the chamber, so if necessary don't just apply s. Therefore, it is only in exceptional situations that they take the COP with them, more often they lie, even several, in the safe for years ...
          1. +6
            April 24 2018 18: 04
            Addition for COP enthusiasts. Apply COP is allowed only when a real threat to life and health. In other cases, you will go for the criminal, because in courses and exams the main emphasis is on the legal side of the application. After each use, the police are called, without calling the police you become a criminal ... There are many such nuances with the COP that it is often better to leave home if there is no real reason to have with you ..
            1. +1
              April 25 2018 00: 56
              For prohibitors, for another 6 years, we will not have an adequate law on self-defense and permission for cop sad so it's alright winked
        3. +5
          April 24 2018 18: 18
          Quote: Vasily50
          All legally.

          Using a legal trunk in an illegal operation is very risky. Legitimate trunks are all shot. Through the bulletproof library, both the trunk and its history are quickly calculated. By the way, in Russia there are millions of trunks on hand, and nothing special happens. Obviously, our legislator is triggered by the habit of thinking and the lack of a clear request from the population.
          1. +6
            April 24 2018 19: 22
            On the topic of the short-barrel, I had a chance to talk informally with the deputies of the State Duma of the past convocation. So thesis is:

            1. unlike a smooth and rifled long CS, it is not unambiguously identified by the population as a hunting weapon, therefore, they really fear that, given the ramp of senseless drunken killings, pistols will appear. The number of killings will not increase, but simply instead of kitchen knives they will shoot. How would the deputies then have to answer for it?
            2. this nifiga did not fit into our defense industry, the market, contrary to the tantrums of self-defenders, is extremely narrow; moreover, for the most part it is now closed by handguns. And to the conditional Izhmash that the gunman shot that the civilian pistol the norm of profit was one. As a result, there is no arms lobby as it was when the gunshots were shoved.
            3. The complete absence of a request from the population, even vice versa. People are more afraid that they will allow the COP than they want to get it.
            4. Well, it’s traditionally against the police, which understands very well that the number of illegal trunks will increase sharply, which, contrary to popular belief, is now very few and the most frostbitten (small drug addicts, murmurs) do not have access to it. And so it will be with every punks for getting it will become easier (steal / take away).

            In general, from the point of view of deputies there is no political capital, but there are many hemorrhoids. Moreover, in our mass media any such initiatives begin to poison as a "gunsmiths' lobby" although, as I have already told gunsmiths, they don’t really care about the CC, they have this money on handguns with significantly less haemorrhoids.
            1. +4
              April 25 2018 02: 15
              As for the population, when the media controlled by you know who they always play the same record with, the scary mass shootings look at America and dilute 1 liter of water with 100 liters of nonsense mixing trauma pneuma and a gunshot it is not surprising that he will be afraid of everything that is so helpfully palm off tv winked
            2. +4
              April 25 2018 02: 25
              The police are traditionally against it because as soon as they start shooting criminals, the scale of the so-called effective fight against crime will be immediately visible No. And this spoils the statistics and does not provide an opportunity for further increase
              1. +2
                April 25 2018 02: 40
                I’ll tell you more, the whole country will be opposed if skirmishes on the streets begin. And not so many criminals will start shooting, how many punks will be gopstopit already with trunks. By the way, it may not be clear to you as a person far from a weapon, but in a confrontation, a gopnik with a barrel vs a layman in 99% wipes a gopnik because he is ready to use weapons. But just the layman will sit down. the same gopota will easily pull up the homies who will be witnesses that this layman attacked first. Moreover, even having bought the barrel and swearing it for half a year, the average person will put it in the safe and will not let it, because carrying a gun is fun only for the first time. But the punks will be armed.
                Sign up for crossfit and running better, and this will solve 99% of the conflicts for you, and the trunk, if God forbid they allow it, will definitely not make your life specifically safer, especially since something tells you that you won’t cut the fly, at least before until you yourself understand why you were advised ;-)
                1. +2
                  April 25 2018 03: 20
                  The whole country will be against winked What did the poll take? It’s ridiculous that they should understand that this is nothing more than a fiction or that you can somehow go into a trance and conduct a survey with an accuracy of 146% in some incomprehensible way lol People who always speak on behalf of the people always know how and how they live lol
                  1. 0
                    April 25 2018 10: 11
                    How would you feel softer, I am not strong about what is being taught at school, but there are people who are sociologists who conduct sociological polls on the basis of which we can talk about the mood of the population with fairly high accuracy. I must say right away that if you interviewed Petya, Kolya from grade 7A, and Misha from 6B and your poll didn’t agree with them, this only means that your sample is not relevant.
                    In 2013, the mood was 83% against the resolution of the Constitutional Court 15% for. Moreover, approximately such figures have been around for 20 years, which is confirmed by a survey of several independent sociological offices.

                    By the way, 21% are planning to buy a barrel with resolution by the way, i.e. people believe that with the permission of the Constitutional Court their security will decrease and they will be forced to defend themselves.
                2. +1
                  April 25 2018 03: 30
                  Shpana can now stop hopping and they don’t need any legal and shot trunks for this. Nobody forbids baseball bats, knives, pieces of reinforcement and other cold things. they just won’t sell it so that your stream of consciousness and horrors about what they’ll allow and immediately the firing starts will be nothing more than tales and horrors seen on TV lol
                3. +3
                  April 25 2018 05: 14
                  And where did you get the idea that the shootings will begin?
                  Quote: morved
                  Sign up for crossfit and running better and this will solve 99% of conflicts for you

                  Gee, I’m running badly, I’d better give the scoreboard.
                  Quote: morved
                  and the trunk, if God forbid, they’ll definitely not make your life safer,

                  Spit. Personally, the barrel was pointed at me three times, starting from Colt, and ending with TT, somehow survived.
                  1. 0
                    April 25 2018 10: 03
                    All this bravado for the time being. And running and simulator is not my advice; it is the advice of all serious martial arts athletes or who served in the Special Police Force OMON.
                    1. +1
                      April 25 2018 10: 20
                      Quote: morved
                      And running and simulator is not my advice; it is the advice of all serious martial arts athletes or who served in the Special Police Force OMON.

                      I do not agree. Especially if I do not like to run. I’ll talk with my tongue. And let OMON and Sobr run. laughing
                      1. -1
                        April 25 2018 11: 55
                        You do not understand the essence of the permission of the COP. In exceptional cases, this is an opportunity to defend oneself, despite the consequences. And in any way, as an opportunity to correct crime statistics, which some have correctly noted, it will only rise and become more bloody. . When applying the COP, a case will be instituted and established, the legality of the application. Bandiuk with a sea of ​​witnesses will point to you as the assailant for no reason. The meaning of the resolution of the Constitutional Court is that you are protected and survived, which means it is used only in such cases. Various "attacks" with threats are not considered a danger to life, and then you will have to prove the real justification for the application ... So, it’s very likely to get a term for using the COP ...
                4. 0
                  April 25 2018 12: 58
                  Quote: morved
                  how many punks will gopstopit already with trunks.


                  I think the punks will seriously “roll back” upside down.
                  What for the culprits will face imprisonment, unfortunately.

                  Train at the dash - as the majority of the law-abiding population in the USA does and who can correctly and accurately use the barrel and knows how to do it safely and when not to do it

                  To take away to / the trunk - you need a headlessness.
                  If a person walks at night and the area is not safe, he can shift the barrel from his shoulder holster into his pocket and, if the barrel is already pointed at him, he can fire his first shot from his pocket, and if he is threatened with cold steel, this is enough to demonstrate c - this is all achieved in courses and in the shooting range, if a person bought a c / s, he will train in practical shooting and will undoubtedly produce more ammunition than a punks that cannot legally acquire ammunition - so what about the punks better sub Otovlen to use - this is debatable.
                  With the permission of a short barrel, a mass of weapons treatment courses and shooting galleries will appear. The right to protect themselves, their relatives, relatives - should be with the population.

                  Since the age of 12, I spent 4 days a week in the USSR in the school dash, releasing several hundred small-caliber cartridges over the course of the evening — I have nothing against once a week taking my family to the shooting range so that my wife (she shoots perfectly), daughter and sons fired into the target for a couple of dozens of shots - this is an interesting pastime and useful in teaching ownership of c / s.
                  1. +1
                    April 25 2018 13: 14
                    sudden saturation with trunks leads to an increase in gop stops because it lowers the threshold for entering this criminal business.
                    In terms of “training” and so on, for several years I had a lawful trunk with the right to wear on my post and you can believe it pins me only the first time, then it starts to strain and at the most inopportune moment it will be out of the access zone.
                    And what is this punks will not be able to legally acquire ammunition? How is it? The same punks will calmly acquire a legal COP, but he will go to business with the selected / stolen but he will also have his own legal one.
                    And on the bill of the right to defend, well, I don’t like the situation in the USA where there are areas where even the police are afraid to go because it’s too wide. And overwhelming majority of people like me according to opinion polls.
                    And the vast majority will score on shooting ranges, look at the situation on the roads there are also anti-driving courses, and a lot of them go? Don’t be naive. The cartridges of money cost so it’s good if the first one releases at least a couple of clips.
                    The trouble is not in athletes like you, and not in hunters. By the way, what prevents you from taking her to the shooting range now? There you can shoot with the COP if you want.
                    1. 0
                      April 25 2018 14: 14
                      Quote: morved
                      And on the bill of the right to defend, well, I don’t like the situation in the USA where there are areas where even the police are afraid to go because it’s too wide. And overwhelming majority of people like me according to opinion polls.


                      Well, I wasn’t in the USA, but in Turkey I got into criminal areas (their Kurdish mother) and had to break through - breaking tabletops on the heads of careless "Turkoman" ...
                      But for weapons - a short barrel is allowed in Turkey - it costs 3-4 times more there than on the world market and is not accessible to everyone.
                      Partners in the Turkish company demonstrated their "toys" - 92 Beretta in F performance (base model), Smith & Wesson Model 1076 (amazing quality with blue bluing) and SMITH AND WESSON 637 38 SPECIAL (monstrous slaughter bandura with a short barrel) - for them this is a male fetish, they shot so-so.
                      But at the same time, the c / s is relatively accessible in Turkey - the people with such a southern temperament are full and there are no problems with any special criminalization of punks or naughty left and right unbalanced citizens.
                      Their analogue of our OMON (incidentally armed MP-5 + Beretta 92) is very professional and cool and will shoot anyone who holds the barrel in their hands for more than a couple of seconds. I recall how they shook Chechen bandiuk out of a hotel in Istanbul - very harshly.
                      It is simple for our bodies to be prepared in advance for serious actions and the readiness to shoot to kill without sticking with ghouls, we need to strengthen the riot police in every way.
                      1. 0
                        11 May 2018 11: 40
                        Well, you actually answered your question. The COP there is just as limited available, only the financial restriction. I would generally allow the COP from us after, for example, 5 years of owning a long rifled without breaking. In the absolute majority, by this time a person will already have a culture of handling weapons.
                    2. +1
                      April 25 2018 16: 20
                      It's funny if you have at least some understanding of weapons, you should know that you can only get cartridges in gun stores, and there they do it only under a license, and if you offer to buy cartridges for a stolen barrel under a license, this is the biggest stupidity it’s only possible that it’s easier than easy to determine the caliber of the weapon from which it was completely a crime and then it will not be difficult to calculate further operational investigations wink So all these prohibitions are only for law-abiding citizens as well as locks
                      1. 0
                        April 26 2018 10: 47
                        Quote: RaptorF22n
                        It's funny if you have at least some understanding of weapons, you should know that you can only get cartridges in gun stores, and there they do it only under a license, and if you offer to buy cartridges for a stolen barrel under a license, this is the biggest stupidity it’s only possible that it’s easier than easy to determine the caliber of the weapon from which it was completely a crime and then it will not be difficult to calculate further operational investigations So all these prohibitions are only for law-abiding citizens as castles


                        That's right - it is impossible to legally acquire ammunition on a stolen barrel. So the "training" punks will end in a dozen shots in bottles.
                        Shooters in US shooting galleries, firing hundreds of bullets per month - this is a national hobby. Their skills, compared to punks, are an order of magnitude higher in shooting, they have a relatively high culture of gun ownership.
                        By the way, the culture of using weapons in the USSR was introduced at NVP lessons - everyone in the class could assemble a machine gun and not send the barrel into a person - safety rules - this was the first commandment that the military instructor drove into the heads of schoolchildren.
                      2. 0
                        11 May 2018 11: 43
                        and that we are planning some kind of wild variety of callibers? 9x18 and 9x19 will have an overwhelming number of pistols. Well, well, some amount will probably be under 9x17.
                    3. 0
                      April 25 2018 16: 26
                      it doesn’t mean sudden saturation out of the way 136 the same thing everyone was screaming machine gun horror mass shootings and other nonsense and nothing is alright so most of the horror stories are simply exaggerated wink
                      1. 0
                        17 May 2018 21: 54
                        Excuse me, who was screaming? A long barrel is permitted from Soviet times.
                5. +1
                  9 May 2018 12: 00
                  Quote: morved
                  In the confrontation, the gopnik with the trunk vs the layman in 99% wipes the gopnik because he is ready to use weapons. But just the layman will sit down

                  Classical substitution. This is not an argument against weapons, this is an argument for bringing legislation to the side of a citizen.
                  1. +1
                    9 May 2018 12: 04
                    Quote: Conserp
                    Quote: morved
                    ... the gopnik wipes out because he is ready to use weapons ...

                    ... this is an argument for bringing legislation to the side of the citizen

                    Do you propose to legally oblige the "gopnik" not to shoot first? wink
            3. +1
              April 25 2018 09: 24
              Quote: morved
              How would the deputies then have to answer for it?

              Give at least one example when a deputy answered for something. He will not answer for that either. But in general I agree with you. There are many who are against, there are very few who are in favor.
              1. +1
                April 25 2018 10: 32
                Well, after the start of shooting, the persecution in the media of the deputies who introduced the bill on the legalization of the Constitutional Court is guaranteed. To consider this an “answer” is a debatable question, but the fact that they do not need it is undeniable.
                1. 0
                  April 25 2018 16: 07
                  In fact, the media are controlled, therefore, to think that some kind of persecution of their deputies by their own media will begin is at least naive winked
                  1. 0
                    11 May 2018 11: 45
                    It is naive to believe that all media are controlled by one person, I’ll tell you more even the State Duma is extremely heterogeneous and there are many who want to drown opponents there even among members of the same party.
          2. +1
            April 25 2018 01: 00
            So here I am trying to explain to them it is impossible to use the legal trunk for criminal purposes, because it was shot, which means it is very easy to calculate hi and they are terrible and start like grandmothers on a bench these damn pieces of iron how scary to live, etc. lol
            1. +1
              April 25 2018 02: 43
              The three most emphasized most common models of weapons used for criminal purposes in the United States were once legal and fired. And this is in states where, thanks to cartels, the availability of illegal Kalash is several times higher than ours. We have ex. the legitimate trunk will dominate the criminal chronicle (as remade gas and injuries dominate now)
          3. 0
            April 25 2018 16: 00
            In America, frostbitten with guns is immediately shot. Maybe that's why drunken reels and beatings are very popular in Russia. Psychos are everywhere they do not count. Over here in the center of Toronto, a psycho swept people. 10 people killed, 8 crippled. True findings of the investigation are strange. However, very much in the spirit of our problems. The “gender inequality” is to blame. Most of the dead women ..
            For those who do not know "gender", that is, "gender" and their brothers are 52 ... or 54 .. In general, do not think about it.
        4. +5
          April 24 2018 19: 19
          Quote: Vasily50
          The Baltic states and Transnistria have weapons in their hands. I saw assault rifles, rifles and pistols. All legally. There, by the way, in the villages and on the roads there are practically no robbers. Fear.
          But in RUSSIA, bandits in the countryside, however, like on the roads, graze without hesitation and the policemen are not a hindrance to them.

          Do not spread what you are not sure of or do not know for sure.
          In the hands of the population of Transnistria there are no machine guns and rifles. Pistols - yes, a rifled long barrel, much less automatic - no. There are no robbers, because the republic is a cop, everything is under control, therefore there are no robbers, no banditry, no robbery, no drugs. There are petty thieves and brawlers. The biggest robbery is weaning mobiles on the street, no more; followed by inevitable finding and arrest - the cops are trained, like shepherds, find and plant. Toxic drugs in the Transnistrian cops are generally zero, they ruthlessly plant a handful of grass. All thieves in law were shot and blown up. Therefore, there is practically no crime above the small things. I don’t know anything about the Baltic states.
          Russia is too big a country, but you can put things in order in it too - there would be a desire. There is no desire (this is obvious). But this has nothing to do with the distribution of machine guns and machine guns to the general population. I’ll clarify again, it all depends on the cops, they have the honor and a basic set of principles or they are corrupt pigs, that’s the whole point.
          1. +1
            April 25 2018 01: 02
            Straight North Korea laughing
            1. 0
              April 25 2018 21: 16
              Quote: RaptorF22n
              Straight North Korea laughing

              Not - but; the usual “red” region (or, simply, a police country). Many, by the way, do not like it: all the rights of the cops; the cop is right, even if it’s not right, it’s harsh, but the majority is for it.
        5. 0
          April 24 2018 22: 06
          Since rural areas have the highest level of armament of the population. Millions of smooth and rifled trunks. But this is true in real Russia and not in your imagination, I’ve traveled around the country a lot of grazing bandits and haven’t heard much about them since the 00s. Well, so that it is ubiquitous.
      3. 0
        April 25 2018 18: 44
        I also shot this pistol and dismantled it several times. I didn’t make much impression, it’s rather complicated.
    4. 0
      April 25 2018 07: 28
      Fans of ks.you all in traffic will be shot exactly the same as you are fans of KS))) and your kids will drag this shit to school. You don’t even know what sites they are sitting on and what kind of conversations they have. Or shoot you showing off a friend’s bragging dad’s trunk. do you think you can’t find the key? remember yourself
      1. +1
        April 25 2018 16: 03
        Lovers of paranoia lol If you’re afraid of everything, I advise you to upholstery the walls with pillows to lock yourself at home; order food at home and also not look into the sky; and there planes fly laughing and less watch TV reptilians from the planet Nibiru laughing Look better, good Soviet cartoons, for example Kitten Woof, he will definitely help you lol
  2. +4
    April 24 2018 15: 36
    When will our prohibitions understand that without developing the civilian arms market in Russia, this is actually a cross on our defense industry request Just look at their arms markets and ours and everything becomes clear No.
    1. +8
      April 24 2018 18: 27
      Are you real, or are you trolling? The military-industrial complex market is air defense, aviation, tanks. The shooter is so insignificant in it that you can simply give it as a gift from the company, and even the cop against this background ... Well, in the states, the most developed internal arms market only steers in the supplies of the army and police to ZigZauer, Beretta and other Glocks. But Colt won not so long ago declared bankrupt.
  3. +6
    April 24 2018 16: 53

    P.38 in 5.6mm (.22LR).
    1. +4
      April 25 2018 05: 58
      But I missed this moment, the funny thing in terms of the article made a mark about the version of .22LR, but who is looking at the plan when the article is written laughing
  4. +3
    April 24 2018 17: 38
    And where is the mention of the Walther P5 adopted by the police in the 79th? The pistol had a barrel length of 90 mm, an elongated frame and shutter (to make the center of mass forward). The fuse was removed from the shutter and the barrel was closed.
    Where is the story that the Beretta 82 was created on p38 automation?
    1. +3
      April 24 2018 19: 05
      Quote: 4-th Paradise
      And where is the mention of the Walther P5 adopted by the police in the 79th?

      Yes, I was also somewhat surprised at the lack of information about this option in the article, because usually uv. the author goes through the entire "line" of samples within the same family, but it’s still about a specific pistol, so it’s not a crime, I brush. Yes
      From SW. hi

      PS
      From “Luger” I had a chance to shoot at a sterling range, graduated in 1971, it seems, with black synthetic cheeks on the handle. The verdict is definitely a ushlepskoe weapon. Yes, the handle is very comfortable and sits like a glove in your hand, the barrel with a low landing and the same handle provide excellent accuracy (first shot), the quality is amazing, the exterior is beyond praise - a kind of diesel punk, but ... Not so - BUT! A tiny trigger guard is not like wearing gloves, you just don’t stick in a finger that is completely swollen (allergic to an insect / spider / snake bite, the effects of frostbite, infection, etc.), and the trigger itself is very “short” and soft; and this idiotic cranked lever that jumps before your eyes with every shot, the magazine lock at the bottom of the handle (like the P-38, Makara and others, however) ... Buee negative Not only in a glazed wardrobe, on a red / blue velvet backing as an aesthetically pleasing work of art - no practical application. stop
      1. +5
        April 25 2018 00: 05
        Р5 and the subsequent derivatives, it was decided to skip, since and so the article turned out to be "plump". As far as I understood, Р4 is the last pistol in which separate units were used from military weapons, so it seems logical request
        1. 0
          10 June 2018 17: 43
          I see. Thanks.
      2. 0
        19 June 2018 11: 49
        Quote: Raphael_83
        the magazine lock at the bottom of the handle (like the P-38, Makara and others, however) ...

        What are you talking about? In Luger, the magazine latch button is located on the base of the trigger guard. Or did you take the buttons to extract the store for the latch? .. And what, "with the meat" pulled the store? .. wink
  5. +5
    April 24 2018 19: 09
    Something a bit too much negative regarding reliability, but meanwhile P.38 is considered the best gun of WWII.
    1. +1
      April 24 2018 19: 32
      Who is considered and based on what parameters? Well and somehow such a statement is strange given its manufacturability.
      1. +3
        April 24 2018 20: 34
        Quote: morved
        Who is considered and based on what parameters

        Well, who “believes” and on the basis of what “parameters” that the Mona Lisa or the Black Square are outstanding works of art.
        Probably the same collective opinion of gunsmiths. I personally heard this thought from the lips of my teacher in the 1977 year. The same collective opinion classifies the MG-42 as the best WWII machine gun, and also considering its adaptability.
        1. +1
          April 24 2018 21: 59
          Well, I almost got married at one time to an art historian who was just evaluating the cost of contemporary paintings, for me personally it is clear why Black Square and Mona Lisa cost so much. It is important not only the picture itself.

          But back to small arms. With the 42nd, again, it is clear - a single machine gun which analogues opponents / allies did not have. And Walter, for which he deserves such respect from gunsmiths (by the way, what?)? In terms of combat qualities, it was inferior, for example, to the same Browning High Power, self-plucking for a military pistol is a so-so dignity, in general, a normal solid average, and also not very technological.

          In general, it looks more like fetishism when Makarov-Stechkin-Tokarevs are familiar and banal and against their background, Walter looks cool because of the novelty.
          1. 0
            April 25 2018 13: 48
            So out of curiosity - about the fighting qualities and who yielded to whom.
            The guys shot at the dash all the main WWII pistols: Nagant, TT, P08, P38, Colt 1911 and
            Browning High Power.
            Browning High-Power with the same cartridge 9mm para, could not penetrate 8 boards - 2 TT and P38 pistols could do this
            Watch from 16 minutes Small arms of World War II. 2 series
            [media = https: //ok.ru/video/18368369101]
            1. -1
              26 May 2019 20: 23
              Quote: DimerVladimer
              Browning High-Power with the same cartridge 9mm para, could not penetrate 8 boards - 2 TT and P38 pistols could do this

              And where does the board? Man structurally on the board is not very similar. Therefore, there was no need to pierce the boards with 2MV pistols.
              Quote: DimerVladimer
              The guys shot at the dash all the main WWII pistols: Nagant, TT, P08, P38, Colt 1911 and Browning High-Power.

              This is generally uninteresting information. Unless, for athletes.
              1. +2
                27 May 2019 17: 10
                Rather, it’s just the military who wonders how to get the enemy behind a light shelter. Boards as a door or a table turned upside down - may well be a shelter.

                Athletes need to make cardboard holes and toss metal heavy poppers and plates.
    2. +3
      April 25 2018 02: 57
      To be honest, on the contrary, I tried to smooth the corners and explain the reasons for the frequent negative attitude to this model. hi
      1. +1
        26 May 2019 18: 59
        I read your comments and am amazed ... I would not like to repeat myself ... But for fifty years, for the first time I heard stupidity from M. Popenker about "8 shots and a throw" and you are the second, who this, and not only this, voices ... By the way, Popenker's phrase about Walter's accuracy referred to the P.1 model, which has a shorter barrel. And you have already applied this phrase to R.38 .... This is how "legends" are born. I'm sorry. I know a lot of people who have used P.38. And only a few, due to the anatomical structure of their hands, respond negatively. But only about the convenience of "landing" the pistol. In terms of combat characteristics, everything has been clear for a long time - at a height. Serious "minus" one - 8-round magazine. Of course, this is surprising ... "High Power" arr. 1935 - 13 rounds, R.38 1938 - eight. Here designer Walter, of course, missed.
  6. +1
    April 24 2018 20: 40
    In the Handbook "Small Arms" of the Beetle, it seems, I read at Fedoseyev: WalterP38 is positioned as an officer weapon, they went for officers, and parabellum for soldiers. Hence Walter more perfect letter reply?
    1. +3
      April 25 2018 00: 14
      I think the question in mass and dimensions lies here, by the way, many German officers preferred R. 08 to Walter, but here attachment to weapons rather played a greater role than actual comparison of the qualities of pistols. In the end, P.38 ousted R.08 with its quantity. Many photographs have the beginnings of the Great Patriotic War where soldiers hold R. 38 in their hands, so I would not call this officer an officer. Well, how it was initially positioned is a completely different question. smile
      One can argue about perfection in different keys. If we compare the design of P.08 and P.38, then the latter is simpler and cheaper to manufacture, otherwise it would simply not have been put into service. If the accuracy and convenience of firing, then the advantage is definitely R.08, although the movement of the bolt group is somewhat unusual. If the question is put on the convenience of wearing it back the same R.38 ahead. So say this gun is "good", but this "bad" is impossible.
      1. 0
        28 May 2019 10: 22
        Sorry, of course, your logic is rather original ... If a soldier took a pistol in his hands, it turns out that he ceased to be an "officer" .... And the fact that there is a staffing list of weapons, which determines which categories with which weapons arm themselves, we will "lower" it ... And, by the way, there was no "banal" displacement of the R.08 R.38. According to all kinds of sources: "... until the end of the war (2 MV) R.38 did not supplant R.08 due to insufficient production volumes ..." Do you doubt -? Read on! I repeat: you borrowed the phrase about "8 shots" out of place - it does not apply to R.38! Walter, in terms of shooting accuracy, is practically not inferior to Luger. And in terms of power and reliability it surpasses it. Plus, there is also the possibility of carrying a pistol with a cartridge in the chamber and self-cocking. In your opinion, there are enough advantages to determine which weapon is more perfect -? I think yes. Moreover, no doubt. And, it would not be superfluous to say that P.08, in fact, of the design, was a dead-end branch - there were no followers. And the design of the R.38, as many people know, formed the basis for the Beretta 92.
      2. 0
        29 May 2019 13: 49
        "The question of weight and dimensions lies ..." - you see a significant difference in weight and dimensions between R.08 and R.38 - ??? It is minimal. Practically, in these parameters, the pistols are the same.
    2. 0
      26 May 2019 19: 03
      Judge for yourself: the difference between the "birth" of the pistols you named is 30 years. A lot. I think you won't have to think long about which one is more perfect.
  7. Alf
    +2
    April 24 2018 21: 39
    For its time, the weapon turned out to be really excellent, although not adapted for production in wartime.

    Great phrase! The gun is excellent, only in the war it doesn’t work.
    1. +3
      April 25 2018 00: 18
      Well, there are plenty of examples where an excellent construction, brought to the ideal for testing, shows more than mediocre results in mass production. And if this is mass production in a war, then it is logical that the quality, and hence the characteristics, will be completely different. Still, the production in peacetime and the military is very different, and I'm not talking about the exterior decoration of weapons, but even about the banal quality of the source material.
      1. Alf
        +1
        April 25 2018 20: 07
        Quote: AlexMark
        Well, there are plenty of examples where an excellent design, brought to the ideal for testing, shows more than mediocre results in mass production.

        Maybe. But weapons should be designed in such a way that the simpler the better. Example-PPP.
        1. +1
          April 26 2018 06: 33
          Difficult to argue, but we have what we have smile
  8. +6
    April 24 2018 23: 57
    "Walther P.38, although it left a mark on history, did not stand on par with other more successful pistol models."

    Good evening, Mark.

    With all due respect, but I allow myself to disagree with you that the R.38 did not stand on par with other models of pistols. At least for one simple reason: it was produced after the war and was in service with the Bundeswehr, if I was not mistaken, until the mid-eighties. And you yourself write that other models were developed and produced on the basis of its automation.
    I have a purely personal impression of this gun. At the end of the war, my father was given a present, just R.38, completely new, so to speak, "the fly did not sit." It was released at the Mauser factory, there on the left side of the shutter-cover there was a stamp of three uppercase Latin letters bvf over the year of manufacture 43rd. I had seen enough of him when I was young enough. He has a magnificent battle, from 30 meters a dry telegraph pole sewed right through.
    Very gritty and comfortable gun. The only drawback, in my opinion, is that the needle of the trigger is too high, it is inconvenient to cock the finger of a shooting hand. And so, it was much later to compare with, and after trying various samples, I realized why the Germans did not change this model for so long. hi
    1. +3
      April 25 2018 03: 09
      Good afternoon. hi
      The military years of release were only allowed to touch, but with the P4 "talked", though in the framework of 3 stores in the dash, which, of course, is not enough. Frankly, the feelings were twofold. It seems to be no special claims, but somehow he is strangely lying in his hand, not like modern pistols, although I was delighted with the same R. 08, as if the weapon fit my particular palm, although there was an American replica
    2. +1
      26 May 2019 19: 09
      Entirely and completely agree with you. The gun is accurate, powerful and reliable. I do not know a single specialist (I emphasize - a specialist!) Who left a negative review about this gun.
      1. -1
        26 May 2019 20: 25
        Quote: Dmitry Bogun
        Entirely and completely agree with you. The gun is accurate, powerful and reliable. I do not know a single specialist (I emphasize - a specialist!) Who left a negative review about this gun.

        Do you read in foreign languages?
        If not, where and how did you find the "expert recall"?
        1. +2
          27 May 2019 01: 45
          I do not know with whom and where colleague Dmitry spoke and I can only talk about myself. Since by the nature of my activity I regularly went to the shootings at the All-Russian Research Institute of Forensic Expertise on Kropotkinskaya Embankment in Moscow, I talked there with specialists from various law enforcement agencies of the USSR, so we all had one opinion about R.38 - one of the best trunks in this class of weapons.

          PS If there is nothing to say in the case, then it doesn’t even worth it ... tongue
          1. -1
            27 May 2019 09: 45
            Quote: Sea Cat
            communicated with specialists from various law enforcement agencies of the USSR

            Ahhhh. Well then, it is clear.
            But how did the "specialists of various law enforcement agencies of the USSR" know what small arms exist in the world? Or did they unambiguously single out Walter among TT, PM and Walter?
            Quote: Sea Cat
            PS If there is nothing to say in the case, then it doesn’t even worth it ...

            Exactly. It concerns you first of all.
            1. +2
              27 May 2019 13: 34
              Are you serious about our specials? Vietnam, Afghanistan, Angola, Nicaragua ... what to list all? And this is only official. It was where to get acquainted with various weapons, and to test it, and bring it here. And for you, there are only special units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs? Or you just finished school yesterday and you have no idea about life in the Soviet Union.
              If so, try to learn the "materiel", maybe over time, and you will write sensible comments.
              If you understand everything and still carry such nonsense, then this is trolling, and for this they are punished. There were many similar "eagles" here, and where are they all now?
              1. -2
                27 May 2019 15: 09
                Quote: Sea Cat
                Are you serious about our specials? Vietnam, Afghanistan, Angola, Nicaragua ... what to list all?

                Somehow not like the centers of world civilization.
                Quote: Sea Cat
                It was where to get acquainted with various weapons, and to test it, and bring it here.

                Do not make up. Unless the M16A1 really got hold of Vietnam, this is a fact. And on her ideas they planed (you can't pick up another word) AK-74. And more, there was nowhere to get hold of. And nothing.
                Quote: Sea Cat
                and you have no idea about life in the Soviet Union.

                Actually, I really have it. Therefore, your statements will make me laugh.
                Quote: Sea Cat
                learn "materiel", maybe over time and will write sensible comments.

                I can also teach you and your "specialists". I'm not sure just what you can master.
                Quote: Sea Cat
                There were many similar "eagles" here, and where are they all now?

                Who cares? How does this prove you are right?
                1. +2
                  27 May 2019 15: 20
                  Another teacher found! laughing "AK-74" was "cut out" from М16А1 "- well, what to talk to you about now? Before that, only Carbine could think of it in his own. Welcome back? Glad to meet you again, it's boring without you. drinks
                  1. -1
                    27 May 2019 16: 16
                    Quote: Sea Cat
                    "AK-74" cut out "from М16А1"

                    Do you understand Russian badly?
                    It's your problems.
                    Or just decided to distort, as is customary among card cheaters?
                    I have another written. Completely different.
                    Quote: Sea Cat
                    Prior to this, only Carbine could have thought of it.

                    In fact, this is information known throughout the world. That the AK-74 was planed of AKM on ideas M16A1. But if for you this is a revelation. then again this is your problem.
                    1. +1
                      27 May 2019 16: 43
                      And what did I distort there, as you deigned to express? What "ideas" from the M16 were used in the AK-74? Switching to small caliber, is this a new idea?
                      Well, what is accepted among players there, you know better, I do not know. And the revelation for me is not even the material from which you were "cut out", comrade Shlagbaum.
                      1. -2
                        27 May 2019 17: 12
                        Quote: Sea Cat
                        And why did I distort

                        You know it yourself.
                        Quote: Sea Cat
                        What "ideas" from the M16 were used in the AK-74?

                        But what, do you notice any differences between AKM and AK-74?
                        Quote: Sea Cat
                        Switching to a small caliber, is that a new idea?

                        Kapets.
                        The most important thing in small arms, the base, the base, the cartridge, has changed. And he does not even consider this a significant event.
                        And yes. The new 5,45x39 mm cartridge was based on a new idea. Exactly the same on which the 5,56x45 mm cartridge worked on the M16. This cartridge (5,56x45 mm) was just revolutionary.
                        You, the Cat, do not know elementary things. But for some reason, argue.
                        Quote: Sea Cat
                        comrade

                        Is it necessary to call names?
                      2. +3
                        27 May 2019 19: 35
                        And why did I distort
                        You know it yourself.


                        I don’t know, please be more detailed.

                        And what, you do not notice any differences between AKM and AK-74


                        Imagine, I notice, not only between them, but also between the Kalash and Arok families.

                        What is the new idea in the 5,45x39 cartridge. Just that this is a new cartridge?

                        What offended you by the word "comrade"?
                        And I do not argue with you, I just trudge from sincere pleasure.
                      3. +1
                        27 May 2019 20: 14
                        Such forums and not even such forums have one common feature ... thoughts splashed into messages do not fully express the thoughts and emotions present when writing this message.

                        People literally do not understand each other.

                        So two respected people, instead of discussing an interesting article, can easily break into barbs and even get to ... God forgive me ... to the forum srach. And who needs it? Try to control yourself.
                      4. 0
                        28 May 2019 10: 33
                        Yes, everything is right for you, the person writes, calm down already and stop making fun! "Great" you are a specialist .... Suck everything out of your finger ... It's not for nothing that your "revolutionary" cartridge goes into oblivion ... Time passed, he "showed" himself and returned the caliber 7.62. And be so kind as to behave yourself. Don't turn the conversation into squabble. I'd love to ban you.
        2. +1
          27 May 2019 16: 10
          I don't read "foreign languages". I was lucky to visit the shooting range of the Moscow Region Research Center and there to communicate with experts with a capital letter. People, conducting tests, shoot various types of small arms, both serial and developed. They have a "library" as they jokingly call a repository of all kinds of samples from all over the world. That's where I learned a lot of interesting things ... And I tried it too. By the way, your remark about the lack of the need to "punch the boards" raises doubts about your competence. Since the time of Tsar Pea, the penetrating ability of the weapon, in other words, its power, has been tested in a similar way. Yes, gelatin blocks are now used, but I think this is not the cheapest pleasure. It was interesting for me to see and, judging by the number of comments, a lot of those interested in this topic too.
          1. -1
            27 May 2019 16: 31
            Quote: Dmitry Bogun
            Moscow Research Center and there to communicate with specialists with a capital letter.

            Communicated through an interpreter?
            Quote: Dmitry Bogun
            That's where I learned a lot of interesting things ...

            They themselves would "learn a lot of interesting things."
            From the outside, I watch with interest the "creation of the Russian army pistol" (this has never happened in the USSR). And I am surprised at the attempts of "specialists" in this area. This is necessary, out of two attempts to choose a cartridge for it (the basis of any p. Weapon) not to guess a single time. It's amazing. Now I'm waiting for the third attempt, maybe it will be successful. And I will not prompt, I do not want to.
            And so, yes, the coolest professionals. Your tongue is so blabbed, Mama Do not Cry.
            Quote: Dmitry Bogun
            By the way, your remark about the lack of the need to "punch the boards" raises doubts about your competence.

            Before the era of the armored vehicles, and it came not so long ago, there was no need for a pistol bullet to "pierce the boards". The Americans were fine with the .45 Colts. Which did not pierce any "boards" at all. But people were thrown in bundles. In contrast to the "perfectly punching board" TT.
            Quote: Dmitry Bogun
            Yes, they’re using gelatin blocks now,

            Gelatin blocks, this is pampering. They generally serve only to adjust the results. And if you have a curved base (cartridge), then gelatin blocks do not need you. First make the right cartridge, and only then indulge in gelatin blocks. Bringing the geometry and weight of the bullet to the best result.
            1. +2
              27 May 2019 17: 22
              The gelatin block allows you to see in detail how the bullet will behave in the body when hit. Terminal ballistics.

              A simple example. The military and (in Europe) police and self-defense can not use expansive bullets. Only FMJ, and they sew. To maximize the effect of the FMJ bullet - make it start tumbling earlier, making it easier for the nose to not expansive recess relative to the rear.

              Bullets such as Lapua CEPP and Fiocchi Black Mamba in the gelatin block clearly show the principle of operation.

              1. +3
                27 May 2019 19: 40
                Hi again! Here the citizen was offended by the appeal "comrade" and caught me in complete "ignorance of elementary things," funny of course ... What do you think?
                1. +2
                  27 May 2019 20: 00
                  Well, if you take offense at a "comrade", refer to him as a "foe". Let's see what then. Vysotsky has a song ... and not a friend and not an enemy, but so ...

                  The address "mister" so for me is a disgusting obsequious servile.

                  hi
                  1. +2
                    28 May 2019 01: 05
                    Man, he won't understand. "Born to crawl ... and so on." Kalash is "planted" from the ARK, - well, what to talk about ... Zvizdets ... that is. - Carbine, or his favorite Kiraly with a cartridge from TT in the anus. request
            2. +1
              27 May 2019 22: 45
              I don’t understand your tone ... Translator - what does it have to do with it - ??? I am trying to communicate with you as an adequate person, and you start to "sculpt" me about breaking through the boards, thereby showing your closeness. Are you unable to understand the elementary - ??? In my opinion, you are trying to replace the lack of knowledge with some kind of mutation ... To be honest, no desire to communicate. Be healthy.
            3. +1
              27 May 2019 22: 58
              However, you will not get bored with you .... You have no idea who I talked to, but have already made their "deep" conclusions ... And "punching boards" is nothing more than a long-standing method of determining the penetrating ability of ammunition small arms. I already wrote about this ... I know the saying. "Constipation of thoughts - diarrhea of ​​words." It seems about you.
  9. +1
    April 25 2018 08: 16
    But did the R.38 14-shooter version exist in reality? Or is it fiction of the Internet?
    However, a long time ago, in childhood, when there was still no Internet in the USSR, I read a book about the scout Nikolai Kuznetsov. In this book it was written that during one of the operations, Kuznetsov took possession of Walter precisely in version 14 of the charger.
    1. +2
      April 25 2018 13: 51
      I don’t presume to say, but it is quite logical that even if these pistols existed in the form of experimental models, after the war they would have been given the “green light”, especially when the frame was changed from steel to light alloy. Perhaps we can talk about another little-known product of the company Walter of the end of the Second World War, namely, the gun designed in 1944, but its design, as far as I know, was never brought to mass production. And judging by the image of the gun, the store in it is clearly not two-row, but who knows what the designers considered the options for this weapon.

    2. +1
      April 25 2018 18: 50
      There are recollections of one search officer SMERSH and he writes that he had 14 charging Walter R.38.
      1. +1
        April 25 2018 19: 23
        Then, perhaps, there was a small series of 14 charging R.38. After all, we also had a TT with a 14 charging store. And also, I did not go to a large series.
    3. 0
      27 May 2019 17: 27
      Most likely it was Browning High Power. 13 rounds per magazine, 1 round per barrel. The SS men were armed, including the Browning.

      Someone mixed up something before the information reached you.
      1. 0
        28 May 2019 10: 49
        No, no one confused anything. "Rumor" came from fiction. I have no right to call it "fiction", but in one of the books ("It was near Exactly", "Strong in spirit", "Wasp's nest") about the Soviet intelligence agent Nikolai Ivanovich Kuznetsov (according to the "legend" - Paul Siebert), the author told about an interesting episode when a 14-shot Walter fell into the hands of our scout. I will not go into details, it is too voluminous ... I will say one thing: during my adult life, exactly fifty years, I have not received any confirmation of the existence of the named sample.
  10. +2
    April 25 2018 09: 56
    Quote: RaptorF22n
    So here I am trying to explain to them it is impossible to use the legal trunk for criminal purposes, because it was shot, which means it is very easy to calculate

    Is everything all right with the logic? What can the police “calculate” if the “trunk” was, for example, stolen from Ivanov / Sidorov / Petrov by a thief, and then used in a robbery? Only that up to such a date this same trunk was in possession of Ivanov / Sidorov / Petrov in possession. And that’s all ...
    Quote: RaptorF22n
    When will our prohibitions understand that without developing the civilian arms market in Russia, this is actually a cross on our defense industry

    And how much can small arms manufacturers earn by selling only pistols? And where does the military-industrial complex as a whole. What is the share of Kalashnikov’s profit from the sale of pistols today? After all, everything else (rifles, rifles, carbines) in Russia is allowed for sale. Your posts are a trivial manipulation of the minds of citizens with emphasis on emotions, not facts.
    1. +1
      April 25 2018 15: 25
      Well, the problem with logic seems to be with you or you just don’t communicate with people and don’t know what they are saying, what they think, what they think about the problem of cops and the possibilities of self-defense in our country, I personally talked to a lot of people who own guns carbines and most of me personally interviewed are ready to buy, say, a cop of our production, for example, the same Makarov at a price of 50 pieces foreign for 100 that is, people are ready to buy but they don’t have the opportunity sad moreover, these are people of different incomes and social status. Regarding rifles and carbines, you don’t know that those who have money don’t want to buy our products at all, motivating that the prices are horse and the quality in the absence of healthy competition leaves much to be desired. Those who buy money they don’t want to buy our rifles and carbines on the secondary because they simply don’t have money for it when I ask why you don’t take loans they answer that you are afraid to take risks and don’t want to buy at wild prices. ituatsiya people with money vystraivayutsya up for import purchase rifles and carbines and what unites and those and others are willing to spend their money on what they want but they do not have such a possibility if there is a demand, why not offer? Now imagine that both of them will increase profits and tax deductions for our military-industrial complex and the state by their purchases of our products. There is nothing wrong or terrible in this. There is practically no development in the Russian cop market, which means that the development prospects are very good. I’m not saying how many jobs will appear in the sphere of small and medium business
    2. +1
      April 25 2018 15: 51
      Once again, for those who are especially dull and those who have a rifled cop or rifle in the tank leave their unique mark, in fact, this is how to present a passport in the course of how Glock got up? An unknown company was and now it is a brand of reliability and reliability. You may not be familiar with such a word as competition when a buyer chooses from several product samples it doesn’t matter a cop or a carbine or something else that suits him completely and the more samples the better the competition begins and the best high performance sample wins wink The more weapons companies we have that will develop weapons at our own expense, the better it will be for the end user quite often people complain that our weapons companies pay great attention to state defense orders and what will happen next when it ends? But sometimes a frank marriage is shoved into the civilian arms market or it’s not what our customers need and are motivated by the fact that there is no competition, take what is possible with such an approach to customers, it’s not surprising that buyers turn their backs and purchase imports, thereby financing someone else’s economy and money go abroad
    3. +1
      April 25 2018 15: 56
      If even a gun is stolen, then without cartridges it is nothing more than a piece of metal and plastic, so your fears here are completely groundless and you can sleep peacefully and listen less to those who like to tell tales from the crypt about scary pieces of iron that shoot cars about horror and fly planes lol
  11. +1
    April 25 2018 16: 42
    morved,
    You believe the statistics, and I believe living people, and different social strata as well-off and not very people get rid of the first time there are no shooting galleries in sufficient quantities, and those that are sometimes not allowed out of the caliber’s power limitations the price of cartridges is slowly but surely starting to grow game for hunting It has become objectively smaller and close to itself it does not allow, which means we need weapons with higher characteristics than what our weapons companies can give
  12. +2
    April 25 2018 23: 54
    Quote: AlexMark
    I don’t presume to say, but it is quite logical that even if these pistols existed in the form of experimental models, after the war they would have been given the “green light”, especially when the frame was changed from steel to light alloy. Perhaps we can talk about another little-known product of the company Walter of the end of the Second World War, namely, the gun designed in 1944, but its design, as far as I know, was never brought to mass production. And judging by the image of the gun, the store in it is clearly not two-row, but who knows what the designers considered the options for this weapon.

    Hi Mark, one more good evening.

    I read about this model of 1944 in the seventies in some German magazine, losing my mind when translating from absolute ignorance of the language. It was said there that this "gun" was designed exclusively as the simplest and cheapest personal weapon for Volkssturm and the "Faustians." Well, sort of those nightmarish MPs and rifles that they let loose at the very end of the war. Those. everything is stamped almost from roofing sheet, which, incidentally, is clearly visible in the photo. And even in a small series the gun did not go, did not have time. hi
    As for the 14-charge R.38, then, in my opinion, this is a clean duck. I also saw a film about Kuznetsov and I, for obvious personal reasons, was interested, but was there a “boy”? And, you know, for ten years of work in the museum exclusively "according to profile", I have not found any information about the 14 - charging model. I think she never was. Yes, and how to place a two-row magazine in such a case when the left and right end to end along the return spring. True, it seems that the Croats tried to do something there, but I certainly do not know this and are completely unfamiliar with their model. wink
    1. +2
      April 26 2018 00: 05
      Good evening hi
      The fact that in the "native" frame it is impossible to place a double-row store is a fact. It is possible to consider a completely exotic version with a single-row magazine with a capacity of 14 cartridges and protruding outside the handle, which is also very unlikely.
      And the Croats really continued the theme of R. 38, making a PHP pistol with a magazine capacity of 15. Here it is what a beast turned out:
  13. +2
    April 26 2018 00: 26
    Exactly, I mean this monster. The monster still happened. They put a spring back under the trunk, right? In my opinion, such a nightmare compilation cannot work normally. You do not know, they did not accept it? Now the Croats are "sculpting" quite competitive weapons, at least according to reviews in the press. hi
    1. +1
      April 26 2018 00: 39
      To be honest, not in the know about the official adoption for service, but the fact that you used it for a while is certain. They quickly realized that they had done something wrong and adopted such a product:

      Also at first the problem pistols were, but they were quickly brought to mind. Apparently they were in a hurry to replace the previous design, they did not have time to finish the device before the end of production. It should be noted that this gun is better known under the name Springfield XD, under which it is produced in the US smile
    2. 0
      26 May 2019 13: 35
      And I would not call it a "monster". Probably a powerful and lethal thing. Of course, in the hands of holding ... Alas. Look at the length of the barrel ... And if the spring is under the barrel, then the width is the thickness, in theory, it should be smaller ...
      1. 0
        26 May 2019 14: 35
        R.38 has two small return springs, which do not affect the dimensions of the gun. And his weight is quite acceptable, less than a kilogram, and how much does a Croatian piece of iron weigh? And the barrel length of the Croat is not much more. The gain is only in the capacity of the store, but to the detriment of everything else.
        1. 0
          29 May 2019 13: 56
          Yes, the springs are small. But there are two of them. How then can one explain this, I would say, somewhat excessive width of the pistol in the bolt section -? Watch the video on YouTube "Walter and TT", where the difference in width between the compared pistols is noticeable.
          1. +1
            30 May 2019 10: 20
            I did not notice the excessive width of the "thirty-eighth". I don't need to watch videos either, I dealt with both machines in reality. In "Walter R.38" there is one design flaw - a high-located "spur" of the trigger, you have to turn the pistol in your palm to cock the trigger with the thumb of the shooting hand. Otherwise, everything is comfortable.
            1. 0
              30 May 2019 14: 38
              Since they did not notice, then everything is wonderful. And do not watch the video - for nothing. This is not a royal thing ... By the way, I also dealt with these machines in reality. So, when behind the belt or under the armpit the TT is one thing, and when R.38 is another. Everything is relative. And in the same video, it is the significant difference in the transverse dimensions that is noticeable.
              1. +1
                30 May 2019 15: 43
                In vain you about the "royal" case. But I agree with you on one thing: TT and R.38 are two big differences, and both are not in favor of TT. request
                1. 0
                  30 May 2019 17: 40
                  Nevertheless, there is one "+" in favor of TT. These are the dimensions. Moreover, I'm not talking about the length. And, perhaps, the second small plus: a certain "slickness" of the forms - the absence of protruding details. Perhaps this is "all".
                  1. +1
                    30 May 2019 20: 32
                    When talking about the pros, it makes sense to remember the cons. They were going to remove the TT from service and change it to another pistol, and Voevodin's pistol won the competition, the war prevented it from being adopted. And R.38 successfully existed in service with the German army until the mid-eighties. Yes, and the locking system was copied from it by all and sundry, remember at least the ninety-second "Beretta". I'm not even talking about the fact that Tokarev "borrowed" this very locking from D.M. Browning.
                    Lord, well, you like the TT - well, thank God for something to argue about.
  14. +1
    April 27 2018 00: 08
    Yes, perhaps I heard about this machine. In appearance: from around the world they sewed something of their own. It is unlikely that something new and interesting has been done. Does not cause a desire to spend time and study in more detail.

    Thanks and good luck. hi
  15. 0
    April 27 2018 08: 10
    Again lovers of kototkostvol began their songs, they say to give everyone according to the style and will be heaven on earth, will not. What will the state do then? Protection of citizens is the main function of the state.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  16. +2
    April 27 2018 20: 14
    Quote: Shukshin
    Again lovers of kototkostvol began their songs, they say to give everyone according to the style and will be heaven on earth, will not. What will the state do then? Protection of citizens is the main function of the state.


    Nobody says about paradise on earth, why juggle. And the state is mainly engaged in protecting itself, the beloved. I remember perfectly the nineties, it defended a lot, this state. So let's not talk about long-chewed and sore-talked conversations about the so-called "functions of the state." Not to face adults. hi
  17. +2
    April 27 2018 22: 34
    A good pistol, advanced for its time, quite aimed and reliable, under a powerful powerful cartridge good ! And most importantly, the trigger with a self-cocking trigger (Parabellum P08 never dreamed of!)!
    Waltherites didn’t squeeze themselves with dimensions (although, in comparison with the current Western Army and Russian models, the P38 does not look anymore “somewhat bulky,” but “even elegant” winked !) arranged as they wanted, but with very controversial "minimalism", they took care of the technological design and cheapness, as of small-scale production in more or less adapted mechanic workshops (with a turning-milling and planing group of machines and a locksmith section), and mass, with the use of advanced technologies, with precision casting, hot stamping and profile rolling of blanks, broaching the bore and most of the forming surfaces of the barrel, shutter, frame and parts ....
    Of course, the hard Soviet acceptance tests of the P38 would not have passed (IMHO), but, apparently, the designers did not set such a goal winked ?
    Parallel Walter return springs in the grooves of the bolt were then repeated in his design of a sports small-caliber pistol by the remarkable Soviet designer-gunsmith Efim Leontyevich Khaidurov.
    By the way, the first sample of Walter MP, with a free shutter, vividly (according to the principle of automation and almost “copy” appearance) reminded me of the Soviet Baltiets pistol, the same still-born monster (but chambered for 7,62x25TT), in quantity 16 pieces, "riveted" by craftsmen in besieged Leningrad, for the ceremonial presentation of the local party elite ... and the conceptual associations with the Russian experimental "Berdysh" also inspire ... request
    Beretta 92, IMHO, this is only a “modernized” compilation of Walter P38, almost completely, down to the smallest detail, repeating his device. And with the same hereditary shortcomings associated with poor strength and durability, weakened by locking recesses, leading “lips” of the shutter open on top (aggravated by thoughtless, mechanical, forward movement of the return mechanism) ... request
    Once I heard this rotten joke about "8 warning shots and one accurate throw", but they tried to "get it" about Makarov’s pistol, my answer is the same .... it's all a lie, π ... tryndezh and provocation smile , like bad dancers ... if you don’t know how to aim and shoot, then even the most accurate pistol (hypothetically independently falling into one point with all shots) will be such a bad shooter only an obstacle, as it will not leave him a chance to even hit the target Yes ! IMHO
    I thank the distinguished author for interesting photos to the article!
    hi
    1. 0
      19 June 2018 12: 53
      Beretta 92, IMHO, this is only a “modernized” compilation of Walter P38, almost completely, down to the smallest detail, repeating his device.

      Really? .. Are you unfamiliar with Beretta's device? Or Walter? .. wink
  18. +2
    April 28 2018 01: 43
    Squeaker. Quote:
    "Beretta 92, IMHO, this is only a" modernized "compilation of Walter P38, almost completely, down to the smallest detail, repeating its structure. And with the same hereditary shortcomings associated with poor strength and durability, weakened by locking recesses, leading" jaws "open from above shutter (exacerbated by thoughtless, mechanical, moving the return mechanism forward) ... request

    I apologize to Comrade Pischak, Beretta 92 is a compilation of R.38 with what? And to what little things does Beretta repeat the German device? In addition to locking with swinging larvae, of course. Oh yes, and self-platoon, of course! And what does the phrase about “thoughtless, mechanical shifting of the return mechanism forward” mean? And what strength weaknesses did you find in R.38? Explain if not difficult. hi
    1. +1
      April 28 2018 09: 15
      Dear Comrade Sea Cat, lack of strength (I already wrote about this easily smile Of course, on a sketch it would be more visual, you, because, as a techie, is also, to a greater degree, a visual perception of information? ), which was found by Germans (to a lesser extent) in their P38 and Americans (to a greater extent) in their version of Beretta, a tendency to crack in the most intense, but weakened by samples, cross-section of the shutter (which, according to some descriptions, led to an emergency break-off " fly away "the locking part .. winked ) With which they fought increasing the thickness of the walls (this "event" is clearly visible on the "reinforced" Aberoberetta shutters) ...
      Walter’s locking system and USM, copied in detail, became the basis of the Beretta design, it is obvious to any independent mechanic ....
      Appearance, of course, is modernized, the store capacity is added, but the P38 also clearly shows through the traditional Beretta design, such a German-Italian symbiosis Yes
      The simple transfer of the return spring to the front part (unlike the Waltherian “basic principle” with side return springs) of the open shutter-frame with internal “undercuts” for the closure led to a completely different (alas, Italian designers were by no means compensated, or by thoughtlessness, then whether in the hope of “maybe blowing it up at the competition, and then fix it?”, but if they did, I understand that these designers “didn’t feel” the material, they didn’t imagine the loads arising from the shot, they blindly copied the German console ruktsiyu, the consequences of the return mechanism relinking the durability of the most "Command" details are not expected, what about those mindless "improvers" good say request ?) stress distribution. And, as a result, to the more loaded work of the dangerous section of the Walter-Beretta bolt, with all that it implies (an example of a competent design solution is in the closed section of the bolt-casing of the Russian gun CP-1 "Gyurza, Vector", also using the Walther design of the barrel coupling with shutter) ... hi
    2. 0
      4 June 2019 01: 51
      In addition to the above, the Italians took from R.38 to Beretta an open (external) trigger pull. It is on the right side of the gun and is clearly visible.
  19. +2
    April 29 2018 01: 33
    Comrade Pischak, thank you for the comprehensive explanation. hi

    For Walter I remain in my opinion, I know him too well. But I can’t say anything about Beretka, communication was minimal and a serious opinion about this gun was impossible to make. I can only say one thing: the handle is so thick that it lies badly in a hand of any size.

    Happy and Happy! wink
    1. +1
      April 29 2018 06: 48
      Comrade Sea Cat, Thank you for the interesting, and for me very informative (IMHO, "the devil is in the details" smile ), comments on the topics of weapons articles IN!
      I fully share your positive opinion about Walter P38 good (in the same years as you, I also read the original German brochures and magazines about the weapons of the Bundeswehr, then for the first time I learned that the P38 is aka P1 smile in the arsenal of the FRG army) and, frankly, for me, too, it came as a complete surprise, the abovementioned lines of authorship cited and commented by you Yes
      Personally, I have never been a supporter of the concept of turning a pistol, any one in a heavy and uncomfortable (not only "palpative", ergonomic, but also because of the constant "fuss" with equipment-discharge of capricious and whimsical megazaryadnyh stores ...) in operation "warehouse ammunition "and of the two 9mm Soviet, PM and APS, I definitely prefer Makarov ....
      Good Health to you and Sunny May Day! wink
      hi
      1. 0
        19 June 2018 17: 14
        of two 9mm Soviet, PM and APS, I definitely give preference to Makarov ....

        If they told me: “We’ll give you a gun, but you will carry it all the time, in the office, on the way there and back by itself, the rest is optional, here’s your PM and APS - choose it.” I would, a no brainer, chose PM ...
        But, if they said: "We are sending you on a business trip to a hot spot, of course, you will not take part in any operations and clashes, but, just in case, here is a gun for you." I would definitely choose an APS ...
        And if you said that you would perform your tasks in the immediate vicinity of the “front line”, I wouldn’t agree less than on Kalash with a folding butt and grenade launcher ... laughing
        The choice depends on the specific conditions, and only ...
  20. +2
    April 30 2018 22: 26
    Quote - Squeak.
    "I personally have never been a supporter of the concept of turning a pistol, any one, in a heavy and uncomfortable (not only" palpatively ", ergonomically, but also because of the constant" fuss "with equipment-discharge of capricious and whimsical megazaryadnyh stores ...) in operation" ammunition depot "and from two 9mm Soviet, PM and APS, I definitely prefer Makarov ...."

    Good evening to a good friend!
    I tried APS in the army, there were several pistols from the regimental intelligence. I was very pleasantly surprised by the balance of the pistol with its pretty "bulky", even in my relatively small hand, it sat like a glove even when shooting in bursts. But PM nevertheless, in my opinion, is a police weapon, and here, for us tankmen, it was only suitable "to shoot ourselves when they hit a tank." Although as a civilian weapon, it will probably be in its place. Inexpensive and "angry."
    Happily! wink
  21. +1
    9 May 2018 12: 27
    Rare pre-war prototypes can be seen in detail in this video.


    The main bug of ergonomics P38 - "flag down" puts the gun on the fuse, but does not remove it.
  22. 0
    10 May 2018 20: 22
    morved,
    Naturally, the share of Russian weapons increased after a wild jump in bucks and other sanctions.
    Prior to this, people on smooth Turks went crazy for rough Winchesters.
  23. 0
    26 May 2019 13: 26
    Author, thank you for your work. I confess you surprised me a little. Out of my incomplete 60, fifty years, I am fond of and interested, to an accessible extent, in small arms. Until today, I knew that the R.38 is one of the best, if not the best, Second MV pistol. This is an opinion from communication with front-line soldiers, special literature, gun owners (virtually, on the Internet). Not so long ago I heard the "joke" you picked up about "8 shots and throw" from an "expert" by the name of Popenker - for the first time (!!!), I repeat, in 50 years. Already on the page, in the comments, I find out that this joke, allegedly, was once said to the PM ... Okay. Essentially: P.1 differs from P.38 not only by a lightweight bolt carrier, but also by the presence of a transverse 6-sided pin that reinforces the frame, as well as a kind of "liner" - an insert into the barrel that increases it, barrel, survivability. The barrel, by the way, is shortened in comparison with the P.38. Participants in the Battle of Stalingrad said that from the cold, small arms froze, they refused to shoot. Unfortunately, unlike others, the R.38 fired .... The R.38 is not inferior to the R.08 (Luger) in its accuracy, and surpasses it in power and reliability. As for the convenience of the grip - I will not speak, everything is individual, depending on the hand. Here, something like this ... Good luck.
  24. -1
    26 May 2019 14: 42
    This snag was the characteristics of the Luger pistol, which not all designs could compete with.

    In fact, Luger is only constructively original. His performance characteristics for the army are absolutely unacceptable. During the war, Lugers were used to "arm" the rear. Field officers received Walters.
    Walter, that's all the Germans were able to squeeze out of Par's half-dead wartime cartridge. By modern standards, the Walter during the war, this is a pistol of the Gendarmerie category. Those. not an army, but an army service. The army is the post-war Walter on the post-war reinforced (NATO) Para cartridge.
    After the war, the Walther P.38 pistol continued its service, though already under the name P1. The only difference between this weapon and its predecessor was the frame made of aluminum alloy.

    Apparently the fact that this gun was under a different cartridge (reinforced) and according to the performance characteristics was a real army does not matter. The frame is more important.
    How bad is Walther P.38?

    If he is on a full-time cartridge (wartime), then for the army he is not powerful enough.
    If he is on a reinforced post-war cartridge, then it is not well balanced. Since its design was originally designed for a different recoil momentum. To keep within the standards for combat rate of fire from such a Walter, you need to have a solid and well-trained hand.
    1. 0
      27 May 2019 16: 20
      "Half-dead wartime steam patron" ... - ???? "... He's not powerful enough" - ???? Well, you and "burn" .... Appreciated your humor. Since everything is known in comparison, then you 9 Pair with what are you comparing -? At least, probably, with a 12.7 mm DShK.
      1. -1
        27 May 2019 16: 46
        Quote: Dmitry Bogun
        He's not powerful enough. "

        Not enough.
        The postwar NATO cartridge is quite powerful.
        Read something on this topic.
        Quote: Dmitry Bogun
        then you are 9 Pair with what do you compare -?

        With a normal army pistol cartridge.
        Once again, the wartime cartridge is weak for an army pistol. Normal for him is the post-war cartridge of the NATO Pair. And these are different cartridges.
        You have a bad knowledge base on this topic. A lot of things you just don’t know.
        1. 0
          28 May 2019 11: 01
          Your "expert" opinion is very important to me. Teacher, and to call the "normal cartridge of an army pistol" of the period 2 MV, will not make it difficult for you -? I confess to you, you are the first in my life who called patron 9 Par (wartime) weak. Thanks. We opened our eyes. I wonder if I'm alone ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"