Military Review

"Pishchal", "Taran" and "Peregrine Falcon" from "Automatics". Rostec introduced new electronic warheads with UAVs

25
Three types weapons electronic control of drones developed for power structures concern "Automation" (part of "Rostec"), reports RIA News message of concern.


Among the new products are the portable Pishchal, the stationary Taran and the mobile Sapsan.

"Pishchal", "Taran" and "Peregrine Falcon" from "Automatics". Rostec introduced new electronic warheads with UAVs


Sapsan is the most powerful of the three complexes. It is designed to deal with any drone. The complex detects UAVs in the infrared and visible, radio engineering and radar ranges from a distance of more than one hundred kilometers, accompanies them, and emits a directional stream of electromagnetic radio interference. If the unmanned vehicle is particularly dangerous and is subject to immediate destruction, then accurate target designation is transmitted to the means of fire destruction of the air defense system.

The average "Taran" is effective in the face of the threat of a massive UAV attack from several directions at once. When they are detected, it instantly "erects" above the object a protective invisible dome with a radius of at least 900 meters, impenetrable to drones. Despite the use of a wide range of frequencies for protection against drones, the radiation is absolutely harmless to people, and mobile communication also works under the dome, they told the concern Avtomatika.

"Pishchal" made in the form of a gun weighing three kilograms. It is designed to combat single targets or drones in motion. The battery, which feeds the "gun", lasts for an hour of continuous operation.

The concern "Automation" plan to complete the tests and confirm the characteristics of all complexes in the coming months. By the end of the year, their mass production will begin.
Photos used:
Vitaly Timkiv
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Borik
    Borik April 19 2018 13: 15
    +1
    Go already tried on NATO goals
    1. Hire
      Hire April 19 2018 13: 32
      +5
      By the end of the year their mass production will begin.

      However ... The historical pattern: the enemies create a "spear", we create a "shield".
    2. vkl.47
      vkl.47 April 19 2018 13: 46
      0
      What people don’t do so right away ... "all to Syria!"
    3. Monos
      Monos April 19 2018 13: 48
      +1
      Quote: Borik
      Go already tried on NATO goals

      Hardly. Nothing like this lit up there:

      "Peep"

      "Ram"
      1. rruvim
        rruvim April 19 2018 14: 04
        +1
        My Son is scripting STALKER doing such things on the monitor screen. "Taran" is simply a masterpiece: dog hairbrushes with hats. According to the "fashion" would be better Kipy.
        1. Monos
          Monos April 19 2018 14: 09
          +2
          Quote: rruvim
          My Son is scripting STALKER doing such things on the monitor screen.

          Do you think that 3-D projections are done differently? No one said that this is a photo from nature.
          "Taran" is simply a masterpiece: dog hairbrushes with hats.

          Have you seen the AFAR grating? It’s better to keep quiet than to demonstrate your limitations.
          1. rruvim
            rruvim April 19 2018 14: 18
            0
            But you must admit that this is not serious. Any global or tactical UAV has all the abilities, like a bomber or attack aircraft with pilots. Protected communication channels and proprietary software give virtually no chance to interfere with the flight protocol. Only stupidly knock down. All developments of the Avtomatika concern are only against toys.
            1. Monos
              Monos April 19 2018 17: 54
              +1
              Quote: rruvim
              Any global or tactical UAV has all the abilities, like a bomber or attack aircraft with pilots.

              About the "global" UAV did not hear. I don’t know how it is about control interception, but organizing a fatal malfunction in electronics is quite feasible. Actually, such a task is posed.
          2. rruvim
            rruvim April 19 2018 14: 48
            0
            Well, of course I saw, and not only on MAX, but also in combat conditions. Condensed milk in front of this product "sucked" ...
            1. Monos
              Monos April 19 2018 17: 56
              0
              Quote: rruvim
              Well, of course I saw, and not only on MAX, but also in combat conditions. Condensed milk in front of this product "sucked" ...

              Well, why then did you write these unnecessary words about the "dog comb"?
              1. rruvim
                rruvim April 19 2018 18: 17
                0
                Because in the picture: either it is a passive means of cooling, or a dog comb.
                1. Monos
                  Monos April 19 2018 18: 41
                  0
                  Quote: rruvim
                  Because in the picture: either it is a passive means of cooling, or a dog comb.

                  These are emitters.
                  1. rruvim
                    rruvim April 19 2018 18: 44
                    0
                    Do I laugh, or what?
                    Here is a normal emitter:
                    1. Monos
                      Monos April 19 2018 19: 29
                      +1
                      Quote: rruvim
                      Do I laugh, or what?

                      You can cry. I will laugh. laughing

                      Rice 4. Structural diagrams of some phased array antennas (PAR) - linear equidistant with symmetrical vibrators and a common mirror (a); linear non-equidistant with full-rotated specular parabolic antennas (b); flat with a rectangular arrangement of horn emitters (c); flat with a hexagonal arrangement of dielectric rod emitters (g); conformal with slot emitters (d); spherical with spiral emitters (e); flat phased array antenna systems (g)
                      That's enough to fool me. Go drink condensed milk.
                      1. rruvim
                        rruvim April 19 2018 19: 35
                        0
                        Thank! Very intelligible. And I drank condensed milk under this product:
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS April 19 2018 13: 17
    +3
    Medium "Taran" is effective in the face of the threat of a massive UAV attack from several directions at once. When they are detected, he instantly “erects” a protective invisible dome over the object with a radius of at least 900 meters, impervious to drones.

    I understand that this is against a swarm of drones, a concept that is being developed both in the United States and in Israel.
  3. rruvim
    rruvim April 19 2018 13: 41
    0
    Very pleased stationary "Ram", although ram, as a concept, is by no means stationary. From the journal article I conclude: a stabilized camera on a drone will not see an object in with a sphere of 1,8 km (although it is not clear how). Perfect for suppressing the domestic Phantom 4th. What to do RQ-4 Global Hawk? If he has a flight altitude of 10 km, the scanning strip is 37 km. minimum. Something again, "Rostec" "sawing" ...
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov April 19 2018 15: 51
      +1
      Quote: rruvim
      What to do RQ-4 Global Hawk? If he has a flight altitude of 10 km, the scanning strip is 37 km. minimum

      Shoot down. He is big enough for that. so that it does not cause problems.
  4. ventel
    ventel April 19 2018 13: 43
    +1
    A double-edged sword on the drone, you can install equipment that will respond to a radiation source like a kamikaze to an aircraft carrier.
  5. rruvim
    rruvim April 19 2018 13: 48
    0
    A "Peregrine Falcon" is probably installed in the last car of the same name train. Therefore, he is mobile ...
    1. bk316
      bk316 April 19 2018 14: 37
      +4
      You do not choke on saliva. Where does the article say that a peregrine falcon is shooting down strategic drones? Exactly the opposite:
      accurate target designation is transmitted to the means of fire destruction of the air defense system.
  6. rruvim
    rruvim April 19 2018 14: 12
    0
    Serious combat UAVs of a potential enemy have long been protected from interference in control. The Iranian trophy served to revise all protocols. All expensive Concern Avtomatika toys for household appliances. And that’s it!
    1. Mestny
      Mestny April 20 2018 12: 59
      -2
      This is not about interference in the control, but about creating an EMP of a certain spectrum and characteristics to disrupt the operation of this control itself, or other on-board systems.
      Moreover, it refers to small drones, used for example on the basis of a swarm.
      For large drones, there is conventional air defense.
      Not so long ago there was a universal cry on the VO that Russia has no protection against a swarm of small drones.
      Well - now it has.
  7. Olfred
    Olfred April 19 2018 15: 55
    0
    good, but they wouldn’t hurt us, yesterday laughing hi
    1. Mestny
      Mestny April 20 2018 13: 01
      -2
      Does this mean that cooking them tomorrow is no longer necessary?