Military Review

Go on foot! Russia stops transportation of NATO equipment by "Ruslanami"

172
The Russian airline Volga-Dnepr has notified the NATO command of the termination of the provision of services for the transportation of forces and assets of the Alliance with An-124 Ruslan aircraft. This decision was made even before the rocket attack on Syria 14 in April by the US, UK and France, bmpd reports citing the blog of Diana Mikhailova


Go on foot! Russia stops transportation of NATO equipment by "Ruslanami"


The decision of the airline to stop air transportation in the interests of NATO under the SALIS contract may be associated with US sanctions.

According to the Militarist telegram channel, in 2017, only the French Air Force bought 225 flight hours from the Volga-Dnepr, while Antonov Airlines bought only 75 hours.

With the release of the Volga-Dnepr from the Alliance cargo transportation program, the entire burden will fall on Antonov Airlines' planes. However, the Ukrainian carrier is unlikely to fully meet all the needs of NATO.

Previously, there was a tendency of a constant decrease in the number of flight hours of the Ukrainian Ruslans against the background of the growth of this indicator in the Volga-Dnepr, starting from 2010.

This information is confirmed by the French side. A number of publications of the fifth republic wrote that the Russian group of companies (GC) Volga-Dnepr announced to western partners that from January 1 next year, it will stop providing oversized air transportation services to NATO on An-124-100 Ruslan airplanes. According to Kommersant, Volga-Dnepr doesn’t intend to extend the relevant contract with the French side for 2019 for a year - due to the sanctions policy of western countries regarding a number of Russian companies.
Photos used:
http://maxpark.com/account
172 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Professor
    Professor April 17 2018 08: 03
    +14
    Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS April 17 2018 08: 05
      +146
      Quote: Professor
      To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits

      It’s you who are the Jews at first looking for profits ... and helping NATO, and even enduring sanctions, is complete cretinism.
      1. Logall
        Logall April 17 2018 08: 06
        +47
        Also, a kind of setup:
        the entire load will fall on Antonov Airlines' planes. However, the Ukrainian carrier is unlikely to be able to fully meet all the needs of NATO.

        Ukrainian airlines, every year, serve their fleet worse and worse ... They will not refuse excess profits! Despite the deterioration of equipment and the need for repairs, they will fly until the planes begin to fall ... Yes, and after they continue!
        1. cniza
          cniza April 17 2018 08: 25
          +6
          Greetings to Alexander! hi , it will be interesting what will happen next, I think that work will be provided for our company.
          1. Logall
            Logall April 17 2018 08: 32
            +15
            Victor, welcome! hi
            Quote: cniza
            I think that work will be provided for our company.
            I recalled the old lines of Jura Klinsky:
            “... We will catch America, there is nothing to doubt. If the party said - the matter is secure! ... "
            You give our cargoes to our airlines!
            The case is right. You can’t go against conscience! Such a path will lead to confusion ...
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov April 17 2018 08: 48
              +3
              Quote: Logall
              The case is right. You can’t go against conscience! Such a path will lead to confusion ...

              Somewhere I recently read that everyone should do their own thing. Military warrior, politics politicians, economists economics.
              I'm interested in Alexander, and who are you, a military politician with an economic bias?
              1. Chaos
                Chaos April 17 2018 09: 27
                +4
                That's right, and cooks must rule the state laughing
                1. StVahmistr
                  StVahmistr April 17 2018 10: 49
                  0
                  That's right, and cooks must rule the state

                  We already have one cook ... negative
                  1. Shurik70
                    Shurik70 April 18 2018 20: 20
                    0
                    Ukraine will not be able to properly service its equipment. If NATO moves to it, the planes will begin to fall.
                    So, they will begin to develop their Galaxy. But there is an ambush. It is now that the United States is investing huge amounts of money in the military budget. The next crisis will begin, the president will be replaced, they will begin to save, and the delivered planes will be unclaimed. This was already the case when hundreds of planes were exhibited at the “airplane cemetery”, where they rotted in the open. As a result, the US military itself admitted that they "rolled back from first place."
                    It is no coincidence that now NATO is not making its own planes, but leasing it from “totalitarian” Russia. So they did the right thing.
              2. aybolyt678
                aybolyt678 April 17 2018 10: 01
                +5
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Somewhere I recently read that everyone should do their own thing. Military warrior, politics politicians, economists economics.

                And for a very long time I read pike on cancer with a swan !!! Politics, economics and the military are inextricably linked concepts ...
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov April 17 2018 10: 17
                  +7
                  Quote: aybolyt678
                  !! Politics, economics and the military are inextricably linked concepts ...

                  Any taxi driver in our country knows better how to govern the country, what President Trump must answer, how generals must act. How to formulate the country's budget, and to whom should Ovechkin pass
                  1. aybolyt678
                    aybolyt678 April 17 2018 22: 44
                    +4
                    Quote: Alexander Romanov
                    to whom should Ovechkin pass

                    I do not understand football, but I led a team of 36 people. A little but it is very difficult. Especially the civil service. So, there is a clear imbalance in the country .. take any category except oil and gas and everyone is dissatisfied, people cannot realize themselves to the full. Only IKEA AUCHAN MERLIN BACENTER supermarkets are in bloom ..... We entered the world market as an amateur boxer against Mike Tyson and we are beaten in the economic sphere. We draw out the army, we keep foreign policy BUT !!!! drum roll .... Is it not for the sake of a decent life ?? a feeling that the army, foreign policy, the masses and the economy are each for himself !!!
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS April 18 2018 00: 46
                      0
                      Quote: aybolyt678
                      to whom should Ovechkin pass
                      I do not understand football

                      Ovechkin is actually our hockey player playing in the NHL, and not a soccer player. By the way, one of the most productive and highly paid. That is, in terms of football terminology, Ovechkin is like in Messi football hi
              3. Logall
                Logall April 17 2018 11: 09
                +7
                Alexander, I am also glad to see you! hi
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                I'm interested in Alexander, and who are you ...?
                Power Engineer! And also: Citizen of his country - Russia; concerned Son of his Fatherland; admirer of Russian land; hereditary Cossack, remembering his roots ...
                I, like you, care about what is happening around our long-suffering state! Therefore, I share my opinion. Only by my own and only my opinion, and I do not impose my point of view on anyone! If I were closer to governing the country, then I would talk differently ... And not with you, colleague!
                1. Chaos
                  Chaos April 17 2018 12: 04
                  +1
                  excuse me generously, nickname "logall" how does it fit with your reverence and hereditary and mindful roots? It seems that it was not the Russian word that was also written in some letters not by the Russians.
                  1. Logall
                    Logall April 17 2018 12: 12
                    +2
                    I have nickname "Logall" since the days when it was impossible to register Cyrillic in forums and games!
                    Log - the beginning of a surname, Al - the beginning of a name, and the second "L" - again the beginning of a surname ...
                    What's wrong? I’ve been using this nickname everywhere for a very long time!
                    1. Chaos
                      Chaos April 17 2018 12: 54
                      0
                      but now it’s possible in Russian. There was a candidate at the meeting. She spoke so zealously about helping and protecting children that everyone even believed. But then a citizen in a black suit stood up and asked her. Have you helped children at home or children at the hospital or at home? Can you show receipts or say when and to whom specifically? She said no, until she helped, but I’m going to belay and you have words with deeds how?
                      1. Logall
                        Logall April 17 2018 13: 11
                        +2
                        Do not disperse! But I’m not going to change my nickname because of your complaints ... I’m used to it, I got stuck. This is my virtual name. By the way, my name is Greek, why didn’t you touch it?
              4. sabakina
                sabakina April 17 2018 23: 35
                +2
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Somewhere I recently read that everyone should do their own thing. Military warrior, politics politicians, economists economics.
                I'm interested in Alexander, and who are you, a military politician with an economic bias?
                Nowadays, the military is more versed in politics than politics in war.
            2. Pax tecum
              Pax tecum April 17 2018 08: 57
              +4
              ...from January 1 of next year ceases to provide NATO services

              Those. almost a year later.
              It seems that commerce, even in the event of hostilities against us, will continue to "provide services" or will be pulled to the last, for the contract. Profit, especially in currency - that's all of them.
            3. Pax tecum
              Pax tecum April 17 2018 08: 59
              +3
              Logall: The case is right. You can’t go against conscience!

              Oh how! Bad you know the commercial soul.
              1. aybolyt678
                aybolyt678 April 17 2018 10: 04
                +2
                Quote: Pax tecum
                Oh how! Bad you know the commercial soul.

                conscience is the fear of losing business reputation. A businessman who, for the sake of a one-time gain, will make a deal with conscience, will not find success.
            4. anykin
              anykin April 17 2018 10: 46
              +1
              Quote: Logall
              You can’t go against conscience! Such a path will lead to confusion ...

              For example, when did conscience lead to confusion?
            5. Arakius
              Arakius April 19 2018 20: 04
              +1
              Quote: Logall
              Victor, welcome! hi
              Quote: cniza
              I think that work will be provided for our company.
              I recalled the old lines of Jura Klinsky:
              “... We will catch America, there is nothing to doubt. If the party said - the matter is secure! ... "
              You give our cargoes to our airlines!
              The case is right. You can’t go against conscience! Such a path will lead to confusion ...

              Now, another trend in propaganda is to assure that we surpassed America the day before yesterday.
          2. NIKNN
            NIKNN April 17 2018 08: 55
            +5
            .
            Quote: cniza
            I think that work will be provided for our company.

            275 hours, this is a quarterly load on one side in the BTA, with intensive work ..
            the entire load will fall on Antonov Airlines' planes. However, the Ukrainian carrier is unlikely to be able to fully meet all the needs of NATO.


            It can if it doesn’t break ... But the point is that you don’t want to smile at such kam, I would probably feel sick, and the pilots will risk their health as much as possible ...
        2. Alex-a832
          Alex-a832 April 17 2018 08: 49
          +1
          Quote: Logall
          Ukrainian airlines, every year, serve their fleet worse and worse ... They will not refuse excess profits! Despite the deterioration of equipment and the need for repairs, they will fly until the planes begin to fall ... Yes, and after they continue!

          Right Ukroaviation moves in step with our 90s, if not lower than that. It seems that NATO is already dumb to fly on their transporters. I don’t think they will ignore this fact. He worked with the Anglo-Saxons - they are just crazy about security. Therefore, they will look for other options or relocate their transporters to the airfields of Ukraine.
        3. Ren
          Ren April 17 2018 08: 59
          +1
          Quote: Logall
          Ukrainian airlines, every year, serve their fleet worse and worse ... They will not refuse excess profits! Despite the deterioration of equipment and the need for repairs, they will fly until the planes begin to fall ... Yes, and after they continue!

          These are actions for the future. I wonder how the western layman will react when a Ukrainian company dies NATO equipment and military personnel in an air incident. repeat
        4. Mikhail m
          Mikhail m April 17 2018 10: 22
          +4
          Quote: Logall
          will fly until the planes begin to fall ... Yes, and then continue!

          This is how cunning Putin will destroy NATO manpower and equipment at the hands of dill.
          Oh, recourse , accidentally turned in a plan. I went to prepare for the next sanctions drinks
      2. Romario_Argo
        Romario_Argo April 17 2018 08: 12
        +18
        The news is simply not fully disclosed. A new military transport air division has been formed in Saratov. So it's time to stop using resources for other purposes.
        Volga-Dnepr transported from Ulyanovsk, and there we have Tushka-160, 95-e - "full transparency"
        For a long time it was already time to put secrecy on objects (!)
      3. Professor
        Professor April 17 2018 08: 17
        +3
        Quote: NEXUS
        It’s you who are the Jews at first looking for profits ... and helping NATO, and even enduring sanctions, is complete cretinism.

        Not about "profit", but about the welfare of its citizens. We will not drive them out of principle into poverty.

        Quote: NEXUS
        .a help the NATO, and even endure sanctions is a complete cretinism.

        And until today you did not help? Ulyanovsk is no longer American soldiers?
        1. Logall
          Logall April 17 2018 08: 26
          +12
          Quote: Professor
          Ulyanovsk is no longer American soldiers?

          Professor, stop clinging to the old! You still remember the times of Gorbachev-Yeltsin ...
          Ulyanovsk left NATO base
          ulpressa.ru/2015/05/27/ulyanovsk.....
          And the main factor was the aggravation of Russian-American relations. Crimean U-turn predetermined the fate of Russia. And now it is important to conduct an independent policy, without looking back at overseas “partners”. The base abandoned by the NATO in Ulyanovsk is only one of the symbols of the ongoing cold war between Russia and the West. And how many more such significant events are ahead?
          1. Professor
            Professor April 17 2018 10: 17
            +6
            Quote: Logall
            Professor, stop clinging to the old! You still remember the times of Gorbachev-Yeltsin ...

            Closed? And the airspace for American transporters too?

            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: Professor
            Not about "profit", but about his welfare

            If for you the welfare of citizens is "selfish" then what is the point of the state in general? request

            Quote: Petr1
            But what about the growth do not let?

            Why are you doing this?

            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: Professor
            Ulyanovsk is no longer American soldiers?

            Oleg, were they there?

            So I remember your guarantor even answered the Afghan question about the benefits of this base.

            Quote: sdc_alex
            And precisely for these reasons, Israel bought oil from terrorists, and maybe it’s buying it now .... although it’s unlikely that our VKS covered the bench.

            He bought oil and mixed it into the blood of Christian babies when making matzo.
        2. NEXUS
          NEXUS April 17 2018 08: 26
          +18
          Quote: Professor
          Not about "profit", but about the welfare of its citizens

          That is, about the selfish about the saint ... I understand correctly?
          Quote: Professor
          And until today you did not help? Ulyanovsk is no longer American soldiers?

          Back in 15, the transit base in Ulyanovsk was closed.
        3. Petr1
          Petr1 April 17 2018 08: 27
          +1
          Quote: Professor
          Not about "profit", but about the welfare of its citizens. We are not going to drive them out of principle into poverty

          But what about the growth do not let?
          That's right, why help the enemy, if you could take Ruslans home from the occupied bases, you can still think.
        4. alekc75
          alekc75 April 17 2018 08: 33
          +2
          there are none here, I haven’t seen one yet!
        5. jetfors_84
          jetfors_84 April 17 2018 08: 35
          +5
          Have you checked there? And what in Israel did communism come from increased wealth?
          1. pogon
            pogon April 17 2018 11: 10
            +1
            Quote: jetfors_84
            communism has arrived
            And who needs it? Well, okromya you, so as not to work.
        6. The comment was deleted.
        7. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 17 2018 08: 49
          +2
          Quote: Professor
          Ulyanovsk is no longer American soldiers?

          Oleg, were they there?
        8. demo
          demo April 17 2018 08: 50
          +10
          The other day, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev signed a decree abolishing a permit for the transit of NATO arms and other military cargo to Afghanistan through Russian territory. And this means that the transit point in Ulyanovsk for the transfer of military equipment, which they planned to organize in our city, will be closed. Although in reality it did not exist even a day and remained only on paper

          Recall that in 2011 NATO turned to Russia with a request to provide its territory for the transit of military cargo from Afghanistan, after Pakistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan were closed for this purpose (later these countries again allowed transportation). Ulyanovsk-Vostochny International Airport, whose runway is one of the few in Russia capable of receiving large transport aircraft, made Ulyanovsk a territory suitable for becoming a transshipment base for a military alliance.

          In February 2013, a cargo of the British contingent in Afghanistan passed through our region as a test. However, not a single contract for further transit was concluded after that.

          In Ulyanovsk, plans to create a transit point, baptized as the “NATO base,” provoked protests in 2012. In particular, rallies in Ulyanovsk were organized by supporters of the Communist Party. Then representatives of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation painted terrible pictures on how the city would be captured by NATO soldiers, how they would walk drunk along Ulyanovsk streets, how drug trafficking would flow into the city, and how unsafe it would be to live in Ulyanovsk. As a result, the protests grew, and they stopped talking about the “NATO base”. Although there were rumors that cargo transit through Ulyanovsk is still being carried out. True, not in the volumes as previously planned. But this information was not found confirmation.

          And now, after 3 years, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said that neither the cargo nor the military contingent of the "potential enemy" will be transported through Russia. And, accordingly, they will not organize any “NATO base” in Ulyanovsk. According to the press service of the Government of the Russian Federation, 73online.ru said such a decision was made in connection with the termination of the UN Security Council resolution of 2001. This document regulated such “business relations” with NATO countries. Our country did not want to extend it.

          Member of the Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Political Science Nina Dergunova commented on 73online.ru the decision to revoke the Russian government’s permission to transfer arms for ISAF troops through Ulyanovsk.

          “From my point of view, this is a logical decision, and even more - a delayed response to US sanctions,” Dergunova said. - A year has passed after the restrictions put forward against Russia. It is logical that we put forward their own. ”

          According to the Ulyanovsk political scientist, NATO’s military-political bloc, in its own words and actions, demonstrates that it is aggressive towards the Russian Federation - they train military personnel in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, which can be considered as a U.S. move towards a direct military conflict with Russia. And it would be strange if Russia would help the NATO countries to arm themselves.

          Daria Kosarinova

          Photo: http://xronika.az/politic/page/137/

          So there was not a single NATO soldier in Ulyanovsk.
          1. AlexVas44
            AlexVas44 April 17 2018 10: 10
            +2
            Quote: demo
            So there was not a single NATO soldier in Ulyanovsk.

            Lucky them.
        9. sdc_alex
          sdc_alex April 17 2018 09: 00
          +3
          Quote: Professor
          Not about "profit", but about the welfare of its citizens. We will not drive them out of principle into poverty.

          And precisely for these reasons, Israel bought oil from terrorists, and maybe it’s buying it now .... although it’s unlikely that our VKS covered the bench.
        10. StVahmistr
          StVahmistr April 17 2018 10: 53
          0
          Not about "profit", but about the welfare of its citizens. We will not drive them out of principle into poverty.

          Personally, I don’t get rich from this profit ... crying
        11. your1970
          your1970 April 18 2018 11: 29
          0
          Quote: Professor
          And until today you did not help? Ulyanovsk is no longer American soldiers?
          I’ll say more, they weren’t there never. Ulyanovsk was used as intermediate a platform for refueling and maintenance, we sat down, refueled, meteo and other TSU got on and off ..
          And even that option passed some(no more than 10 flights) of the total - they considered that too expensive for them...
      4. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A April 17 2018 08: 27
        +10
        Andrew, hi drinks !
        Quote: NEXUS
        It is you, the Jews, who are first looking for profit ...

        What profit is there, in a stump ... They should think about survival ....
        Now our "Israeli colleagues" will attack me ...
        We .... Great Israel ... Everyone .... We will trample ... But Rush is driving .... She hasn’t come up with anything from the 70's .........
        It is nicer than reading them - just watching how it looks when it is and flies.
        And Israeli colleagues, from their sofas looking at Arab home-made - let them go through the woods ...
      5. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. alexhol
            alexhol April 17 2018 09: 32
            -1
            Yes, they won’t be without work: now they wake up dogs to exhibitions to carry to the “geyropa”. As for Trump, it’s for you to pray: as he says, such and the ruble exchange rate will be with you. Sanctions were canceled - the course went up. Handsome.
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS April 17 2018 09: 35
              +1
              Quote: alexhol
              As for Trump, it’s for you to pray: as he says, such and the ruble exchange rate will be with you.

              Yeah, he complained that the Russians had lowered the ruble by a specialist, and that they did not play by the rules. wassat
              Quote: alexhol
              Handsome.

              Look ... well it turns out, keep praying, sickly.
              1. alexhol
                alexhol April 17 2018 09: 45
                0
                Trump from those who keep their campaign promises and not only. Today, the US unemployment rate is one of the lowest in 40 years. The defense industry enterprises are provided with work for many years to come and not at the expense of the money of their own taxpayers. He is an extrasystem politician. There are no authorities for him. Yes, with cockroaches in my head, but they ruled such a country and were full (George W. Bush Jr.) and the country did not fall apart.
              2. alexhol
                alexhol April 17 2018 09: 52
                0
                .well it turns out, keep praying, sickly.
                Regarding faith. In our area, despite the Soviet rule, they have not forgotten God. And we do not pray to the mustachioed idol in uniform, as some here, but we go to church on Sundays as families, and we have the holidays that our ancestors celebrated.
                1. Serg65
                  Serg65 April 17 2018 10: 28
                  +3
                  Quote: alexhol
                  Regarding faith. In our area, despite the Soviet rule, they have not forgotten God.

                  what But in Russia differently?
                  Quote: alexhol
                  And we pray not to the mustached idol in uniform, as some here,

                  laughing Well, yes, specifically your idol is completely different!
                  Quote: alexhol
                  we have the holidays that our ancestors celebrated

                  what Were your ancestors different?
                  1. alexhol
                    alexhol April 17 2018 10: 32
                    -1
                    Well, at the expense of the "idol" - yes. It is for many. here I agree with you. 100%.
              3. alexhol
                alexhol April 17 2018 09: 58
                0
                By the way, today is a day off in Belarus: the Orthodox holiday today is Radonitsa. So, if you can go to the cemetery today, clean the graves of your relatives and pray as you can. If you do not preserve the traditions of your ancestors, the traditions of other nations will come to you. No counter sanctions will help.
                1. Serg65
                  Serg65 April 17 2018 10: 30
                  +1
                  Quote: alexhol
                  If you do not preserve the traditions of your ancestors, the traditions of other nations will come to you.

                  Alexander .. not, all the same, probably Alex, if Stanislav Stanislavovich remained in power, do you think your traditions would have changed much?
            2. Serg65
              Serg65 April 17 2018 10: 25
              +3
              Quote: alexhol
              as he says - such and the ruble will be with you.

              It's fun to hear this from a resident of Belarus, which is entirely dependent on Russia good
              1. alexhol
                alexhol April 17 2018 10: 44
                -1
                You won’t believe it, but because of the high euro exchange rate, a tender for the supply of equipment broke down. "All because of you," angry (Euro-Ros. Ruble-Bel. Ruble).
                okay, today’s a day off, I’ll go with a little to ride a bike.
                1. alexhol
                  alexhol April 17 2018 10: 45
                  +1
                  And my country, although small, is written with a capital letter, dear. wink
                  1. Serg65
                    Serg65 April 17 2018 12: 10
                    +1
                    Quote: alexhol
                    And my country, although small, is written with a capital letter, dear

                    The key is falling, call!
                2. Serg65
                  Serg65 April 17 2018 10: 46
                  +1
                  Quote: alexhol
                  because of the high euro exchange rate, a tender for delivery

                  Do not put five fingers in your mouth and catch the tender yes
                  1. alexhol
                    alexhol April 17 2018 12: 27
                    0
                    You know better from the guard booth.
          2. Pete mitchell
            Pete mitchell April 17 2018 10: 06
            +4
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: alexhol
            Judging by the number of consonants with you, this site is slowly turning into a bunch of nerds.

            Dear, Ruslans will not remain without work ...

            alezhol, you are somehow more modest in the corners: for example, the Nexus and I often disagree with each other, but in this case he is right. The market for transportation of bulky goods is huge, the 404th will not cope, and God forbid they do not kill. And it’s worthwhile to wonder what Ruslans are transporting? It’s one thing when Swedish rescuers go on a mission, for information it’s 60 people with all the equipment for 60 days as an “autonomous car”, and another thing when all explosive rubbish is transported, they take out their galaxy and globemaster. And one of the main reasons why Ruslans are rented: they calmly go to a place where, despite advertising statements, the bourgeoisie do not sit down.
            It was high time to do this, finally .., I hope the airspace will also not be forgotten to close
            1. alexhol
              alexhol April 17 2018 10: 16
              0
              According to the technical director of Volga-Dnepr, Viktor Tolmachev, now Ruslan is "this is the VAZ-2101 in aviation." In particular, the cost of one aircraft for the entire cycle of its operation (the cost of the An-124 upon purchase plus maintenance costs) increases by 18 times by the end of the resource. For comparison, such growth for the cargo Boeing 747-400F is only fourfold.

              The amount of money earned by Ruslan is reduced annually, said Valery Gabriel, vice president of charter cargo transportation Volga-Dnepr. This is due in part to the increase in the cost of the An-124 flight hour, which currently stands at 33,4 thousand dollars.

              While maintaining a relatively stable demand for the transportation of unique oversized cargo, the demand for Ruslan is gradually declining. The market already needs more lifting machines that meet the promising (until 2040) requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Without major technical changes, the An-124 will lose the main profitable markets in the future - the countries of Europe, the USA and Canada, where the requirements for aviation security, noise and emissions are extremely high. At the same time, the need for cargo carriers in aircraft of a class comparable with Ruslan is estimated at 2030-55 units until 80.
        2. BecmepH
          BecmepH April 17 2018 09: 55
          +6
          Quote: alexhol
          Nexus, what is the operating system on your computer (or some other gadget)? Judging by the number of consonants with you, this site is slowly turning into a bunch of nerds. These planes rot without work on .... in hangars, experts will simply leave, and Ukrainians now joyfully rub their hands. This is exactly idiocy.

          Sorry for the "minuses" no. You, my dear, dig up a garden for your neighbor-enemy, plant a bulb, grow it, dig it up, put it in storage, and then prepare it for the whole winter. and we’ll sort it out without snotty.
          And the Hoh Llamas just have to rub their hands. They are no longer capable of more. Yes, and you too ...
          1. alexhol
            alexhol April 17 2018 10: 10
            +1
            It is with you - enemies are neighbors all around. And here, we are just neighbors. Yes, and the NATO have warned you? Warned. They didn’t shoot in the back? No. But for some reason they are enemies, and Erdogan is a friend. Only a friend, for some reason, also “walks” on the territory of Syria without an invitation. But he can. The pipe is laid. And our people ... well, in general, if we say "the enemy means the enemy."
            1. Serg65
              Serg65 April 17 2018 10: 32
              +3
              Quote: alexhol
              It is with you - enemies are neighbors all around. And we have just neighbors

              laughing If it weren’t for the evil Russians, you would have long been the eastern voivodeship of a good neighbor !!!
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. alexhol
                alexhol April 17 2018 12: 38
                +1
                Sometimes it gives me pleasure to see how the military (former military) show erudition in the fields of macroeconomics. Always remember the immortal Sharikov. So I sin, I repent. Me before Easter a month and a half by the way there was no site. "Post" so to speak. But I am also happy to replenish my knowledge base when I see the comments of military professionals in my field.
                1. BecmepH
                  BecmepH April 17 2018 14: 09
                  +2
                  Quote: alexhol
                  Sometimes it gives me pleasure to see how the military (former military) show erudition in the fields of macroeconomics.

                  It seems that the post did not do you any good. It seems that you started about airplanes, and you flew to the macroeconomics ... There is nothing to tell you, therefore, turn the arrows.
                  If Russia does not suit you, so spit on it. You still have many neighbors.
                  We also do not like much in the actions of those in power. And you offer us to scold Russia-Mother for this?
                  Go ... shrimp, repack red fish
      6. Serge Gorely
        Serge Gorely April 17 2018 09: 51
        +5
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: Professor
        To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits

        It’s you who are the Jews at first looking for profits ... and helping NATO, and even enduring sanctions, is complete cretinism.

        In the Israeli army:
        - Continue the fire!
        - The cartridges are over!
        - And you buy from me.
      7. Lynx33
        Lynx33 April 17 2018 10: 17
        +1
        Jews are right, because the war is primarily in the economic plan, to counter this, you need to earn money wherever you can. Here we are harming our aviation and our economy, not NATO.
      8. Vladimirsky
        Vladimirsky April 17 2018 16: 50
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        It’s you who are the Jews at first looking for profits ... and helping NATO, and even enduring sanctions, is complete cretinism

        Right! 4 years of sanctions, and we are doing this - we are helping NATO members. And before the end of 2018, both Chip and Dale will come to their aid more than once .....
    2. Thrall
      Thrall April 17 2018 08: 06
      +16
      Quote: Professor
      Well done.

      In June 1941, too, the USSR ceased to profit from the supply of coal, ore, etc. to Germany
      1. askort154
        askort154 April 17 2018 09: 48
        +2
        Thrall ....In June 1941, too, the USSR ceased to profit from the supply of coal, ore, etc. to Germany

        And the United States until 1943 supplied German oil (and not only oil).
        1. Incvizitor
          Incvizitor April 17 2018 15: 44
          +1
          And the United States until 1943 supplied German oil (and not only oil).

          Well, duck American Jews sponsored Hitler to the end they don’t smell like money laughing
    3. Hammerlock
      Hammerlock April 17 2018 08: 07
      +12
      To spite mom freezes to my feet.

      I would answer you, but I'm afraid to get into the ban
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 April 17 2018 08: 11
        +8
        Quote: Hammerlock
        I would answer you, but I'm afraid to get into the ban

        Turn to Sasha Romanov, he will answer, he doesn’t get into the ban!
    4. newcomer
      newcomer April 17 2018 08: 07
      +5
      I will see how your “Galaxy” cope. and indeed, NATO_ is your mother.
    5. Stas157
      Stas157 April 17 2018 08: 14
      +4
      Quote: Professor
      Russian companies will lose profits

      Maybe they are just busy transporting in Syria?
    6. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD April 17 2018 08: 19
      +3
      Quote: Professor
      Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

      Many of the things available to Ruslan are unique. But because NATO logistics will be difficult and slowed down in any situation. Even if you use Ukrainian capacities for wear and tear .. So there will be losses, although not at the level of disaster ..
    7. siberalt
      siberalt April 17 2018 08: 22
      +4
      Yeah. The business of conscience is null and void. We will increase the supply of palm oil to Russia by military transport, we will support our producers of dairy products! winked
    8. avt
      avt April 17 2018 08: 29
      +7
      Quote: Professor
      Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer.

      bully Azochenway! So the beneficiary of the gesheft made a mistake. If they could, then the US would, yes, but would have attached themselves to the topic. The only one who can block something on supplies is Antonov. It seems like they are flying. Wherever the 124th is flying, the S-5 stupidly does not land. But the S-19 doesn’t have enough load capacity. But here we have an analog ,, Globmaster "is clearly not enough request ,, Ermak "is not just not in the nest, but not .... in the duck, well, there., Where, you will be waist-high"
    9. vorobey
      vorobey April 17 2018 08: 30
      +8
      Quote: Professor
      To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits


      Syrian express ... they will now carry shells and beeches ... in the Middle East they say demand is increasing ...

      by agreement, the trump was supposed to advertise the C300 and advertised them ..
    10. Every
      Every April 17 2018 08: 31
      +2
      Quote: Professor
      Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

      "To spite my mother frostbite ears" - to be more precise.
    11. loginovich
      loginovich April 17 2018 08: 37
      +3
      Quote: Professor
      Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

      The inhabitants of the promised land are not aware of the concept of pride?
      1. Mestny
        Mestny April 17 2018 09: 30
        -1
        Their pride is only for the civilized ones, whom they hope to control completely in the future.
        The Russians are a threat to them, and accordingly the evil barbarians whom they want to destroy.
        And since it doesn’t work out, it remains only to spray saliva on the Internet, demonstrate sarcasm.
        And why are they so disliked?
        1. pogon
          pogon April 17 2018 11: 15
          0
          Quote: Mestny
          And why are they so disliked?
          Russian then? Yes, the most hated country in the world, and the neighbors love it, especially the brothers from Ukraine.
    12. Yarr_Arr
      Yarr_Arr April 17 2018 08: 39
      +2
      Sorry, I didn’t quite understand: how Galaxy will be more in demand (for oversized transportation)? And from what territory do they fly?
    13. d1975
      d1975 April 17 2018 08: 52
      +8
      You remind me of a joke about a boxer.
      - Why do you have a head, they beat it! -
      -And what else is she for?
      -I still eat there!
      So it’s with you, what’s what, the main thing is money! NATO is already actually enemy No. 1. let them walk on foot. And profit is not a conscience. Personally, I'm glad!
      1. Mestny
        Mestny April 17 2018 09: 32
        +1
        Yes, he understands everything perfectly. Here is another.
        Here is a demonstration of their extreme malice, contempt and hatred for Russia and Russians.
        Therefore, no matter what happens - these same fierce enemies. Not dumb dashing Americans, but these.
    14. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov April 17 2018 08: 57
      +3
      Quote: Professor
      Russian companies will lose profits

      In addition to profit, we still have HONOR! Accustomed to "ride" on the necks of Russian ..?
      Your time is running out ..
      1. NEOZ
        NEOZ April 17 2018 10: 27
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        In addition to profit, there is

        it's all about profit ...
        guess which airline carries cargo on the military technical cooperation (military-technical cooperation)?
        and as we know, companies cooperating with companies under sanctions themselves fall under sanctions ... i.e. there will be an arrest of money for NATO transportation ...... that's all .....
    15. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 April 17 2018 09: 04
      +2
      I think it is unlikely that Israeli airlines would transport equipment from Palestine, or Hezbollah, right professor?
      1. Professor
        Professor April 17 2018 10: 33
        +3
        Quote: Alexey-74
        I think it is unlikely that Israeli airlines would transport equipment from Palestine, or Hezbollah, right professor?


        Quote: Sergey985
        Professor! Israeli company denies air transportation of military equipment to Iran. Imagine this for a second. So you say?

        I missed something. NATO and Russia broke off diplomatic relations? Maybe NATO is organizing attacks against your citizens? Maybe at the official level threatens to erase you from the world map? Not? Then your comparisons are not correct. Moreover, what have you still transported NATO cargo if they are your enemies? lol
        1. The comment was deleted.
    16. Sergey985
      Sergey985 April 17 2018 09: 13
      0
      Professor! Israeli company denies air transportation of military equipment to Iran. Imagine this for a second. So you say?
      1. Mestny
        Mestny April 17 2018 09: 34
        +1
        Yes, even a professor, even an academician.
        It’s time for Russophobes to chase pissing rags, regardless of rank.
        The war is on, it is necessary to determine. The time of polite discussions and evidence ends.
        1. Vitaly Anisimov
          Vitaly Anisimov April 17 2018 12: 06
          +2
          Quote: Mestny
          Yes, even a professor, even an academician.
          It’s time for Russophobes to chase pissing rags, regardless of rank.
          The war is on, it is necessary to determine. The time of polite discussions and evidence ends.

          We are trying, but too many of them have divorced, especially the "secretive" in Russia .. These are the most dangerous! negative
      2. 72jora72
        72jora72 April 17 2018 10: 26
        +2
        Professor! Israeli company denies air transportation of military equipment to Iran. Imagine this for a second. So you say?
        Yes, stop. You are being led on the highlands of Prohffesor, he is a professional troll.
    17. Topotun
      Topotun April 17 2018 09: 19
      +2
      Well, yes, it’s better to transport the enemies of your country for unsecured pieces of paper. Throwing them closer again to our borders. Yes, and at the risk that one day our planes may simply be arrested. For example, due to regular sanctions. Let their aircraft transfer. It also seems to us that we will soon have to fully engage in the transfer of troops. Apparently, our "partners" do not calm down until they add fuel to the fire of kerosene.
    18. Cxnumx
      Cxnumx April 17 2018 09: 28
      +1
      Quote: Professor
      Well done. To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer.

      will suffer)) otherwise they would have long refused their services. it's like with rocket engines) at the expense of profit loss - yes, but the question is in the number and ratio of ours and their losses.
    19. uav80
      uav80 April 17 2018 09: 56
      +2
      Under the Strategic Airlift Interim Solution program, only 2 planes are being chased, while the rest have all orders 2-3 years in advance with the Asians ...
    20. Vend
      Vend April 17 2018 09: 57
      0
      Quote: Professor
      Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

      Russia will gain more than lose.
    21. 72jora72
      72jora72 April 17 2018 10: 12
      0
      Well done. good To spite mom freeze at the feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool
      The same thing can show you ...... fool
    22. PV KGB of the USSR
      PV KGB of the USSR April 17 2018 10: 17
      +1
      To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer.


      How is it in Hebrew! What else offer haggling?
    23. NEOZ
      NEOZ April 17 2018 10: 21
      0
      Quote: Professor
      Russian companies will lose profits

      An124 resource is not unlimited ... An124 production is stopped ... what to do with money when oversized air transportation is needed?
      more ... guess what kind of planes carry military cargoes of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Rosoboron, etc.?
      guessed it! organizations working with sanctioned companies themselves are subject to sanctions ...
    24. hohkn
      hohkn April 17 2018 10: 36
      0
      Quote: Professor
      NATO will not suffer.

      It’s not a fact that all equipment will reach its destination, for
      Quote: Logall
      Ukrainian airlines, every year, serve their fleet worse and worse ...

      hi
    25. _Jack_
      _Jack_ April 17 2018 10: 50
      0
      Under current conditions, continuing to serve NATO, albeit for money, is nonsense. Yes, NATO will not suffer from this, and the Volga-Dnepr will lose revenue, but this does not mean that we need to continue to serve the armed forces of states that are set up for us is clearly hostile. It’s about how Israel serves the Iranian army — money.
    26. wax
      wax April 17 2018 11: 14
      0
      The light did not converge on NATO.
    27. 17085
      17085 April 17 2018 12: 35
      +1
      Quote: Professor
      Well done. To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer.


      Professor. How biased and superficial. From whom, but I did not expect this from you.
      It turns out that the galaxies before that just stood ?! I won’t dig deeper. But your authority sank in my eyes. Or do you have shift work there and I respected the comments of your shift?
    28. NF68
      NF68 April 17 2018 16: 32
      0
      Well, how can Russia not be cheated? You are well done too. Shoot more often and more precisely at the Palestinians. And you will live even happier.
    29. Slavs
      Slavs April 17 2018 18: 19
      0
      No, we should shit on our heads, and we will carry them ...))) Well, and if it’s more pleasant for you, don’t worry, NATO will not suffer ... Until it suffers ...)))
    30. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek April 17 2018 21: 38
      +2
      Quote: Professor
      Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

      you didn’t hear anything of the same “optimism” when other countries introduced sanctions !!! what wink laughing laughing laughing
    31. The comment was deleted.
    32. The comment was deleted.
    33. sabakina
      sabakina April 17 2018 23: 30
      0
      Quote: Professor
      Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool


      Alley, there is your policy, and there is GEOPOLITICS!
    34. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by April 19 2018 16: 30
      0
      How many Galaxy ones? in 2016, there were only about 50 of them. They would be enough for mattresses ...
      Doesn't shine for the paddling pool, except at sky-high prices?
      Well, yes, one word - sanctions ...
    35. Dimmedroll
      Dimmedroll April 19 2018 20: 26
      0
      Well, the question is, will it suffer or not, transportation in price will grow at least twice. Logistics will be complicated, which again translates into money. And they consider money not like us.
  2. Vanek
    Vanek April 17 2018 08: 03
    +2
    Moskvich.

    Children's.

    PEDAL.

    Orange.

    hi
  3. newcomer
    newcomer April 17 2018 08: 05
    +4
    Well done! wink let Antonovites transport them, I expect loud falls of aircraft with firewood.
  4. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch April 17 2018 08: 06
    +6
    Oh, because of the sanctions. It seems that the Volga-Dnepr Defense Ministry has signed for a long time and in full. The booze on BV adult went.
  5. Turgon
    Turgon April 17 2018 08: 14
    +5
    Let's not promise. A. They will entice us with a honey dollar and we will provide our own aircraft to choose from. There have already been precedents.
    1. udincev
      udincev April 17 2018 09: 18
      0
      Quote: Turgon
      They will entice us with a honey dollar and we will provide our own aircraft to choose from. There have already been precedents.

      Not everyone believes in the laws of the economy of capitalism, but they do not stop working from this.
  6. Mihail177
    Mihail177 April 17 2018 08: 14
    +3
    that from January 1 of next year will cease to provide NATO services
    And why not from May 1 of the current year? They impose sanctions not a year after the announcement, but immediately ... and why should we pull something?
    1. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii April 17 2018 08: 20
      +8
      We comply with contracts hi
      1. pafegosoff
        pafegosoff April 17 2018 08: 29
        +3
        But they don’t care about contracts!
    2. NEOZ
      NEOZ April 17 2018 10: 31
      0
      Quote: Michael177
      And why not from May 1 of this year

      V-D owner lives with his family in London for permanent residence ....
  7. Mihail177
    Mihail177 April 17 2018 08: 22
    +2

    hi Yes, why the hell are they following? And on the Skripaly, and on Syria, etc. .....
  8. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff April 17 2018 08: 28
    +2
    The tactics “I will sell all, but I will be rich” - 90% of the government of the Russian Federation, 60% of the State Duma, 50% of the Federation Council (there are many Narusovs or oligarchs there, whose homeland is the US Coast, the EU and London.
    1. sdc_alex
      sdc_alex April 17 2018 09: 03
      +2
      Quote: pafegosoff
      The tactic "I’ll sell everyone, but I will be rich," - 90% of the Russian government, 60% of the State Duma, 50% of the Federation Council


      and 80% (and most likely all 95%) of the rest of the country's population ... you know capitalism hi
    2. udincev
      udincev April 17 2018 09: 22
      0
      Quote: pafegosoff
      The tactic "I’ll sell everyone, but I will be rich", -

      - 99% of the current social structure of society in Russia. Therefore, the% of adherence to it of the branches of government is significantly underestimated.
  9. Placebo
    Placebo April 17 2018 08: 29
    0
    "The Volga-Dnepr Russian group of companies (SC) announced to its Western partners that starting January 1 of next year, it will cease to provide NATO with oversized air services on An-124-100 Ruslan transport aircraft."
    So, while transporting, it turns out tough ...
  10. Masya masya
    Masya masya April 17 2018 08: 30
    +1
    Go on foot! Russia stops transportation of NATO equipment by "Ruslanami"

    Landed a few, so to speak ...
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. Jeremiah
    Jeremiah April 17 2018 08: 40
    +6
    Quote: Professor
    Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

    During World War II it would be very profitable to supply coal and firewood to Auschwitz, Majdanek, Treblinka, even by a couple of addresses .... But for some reason the Union did not
  13. Baby sitter
    Baby sitter April 17 2018 08: 41
    +2
    Quote: Professor
    Galaxy will be even more popular. NATO will not suffer.

    And who will give them a corridor across Russia?
  14. Vard
    Vard April 17 2018 08: 46
    +1
    Of course there will be unhappy ... no, not so ... they will be furious ... no, not that again ... That's about it ... And they will cry and moan to carry the iron in their hands ...
  15. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 17 2018 08: 56
    0
    They are sanctions to us, and we will not stay in debt! In the USSR, such cooperation was not even considered! And now we climbed without soap! Where they climbed, they got there!
  16. den3080
    den3080 April 17 2018 08: 57
    +2
    It was of course ingenious to haul enemy loads. With EBN, it started. It is good that everything is gradually being brought into conformity with reality.
  17. keeper03
    keeper03 April 17 2018 08: 58
    0
    And we did it ?! request Well, finally ... no words! They have long been needed send on a scooter! am
  18. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov April 17 2018 08: 58
    +1
    Well, that’s already something. Although of course it’s too early to draw conclusions. We have fake news chasing fake news!
  19. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 17 2018 09: 03
    0
    Quote: Baby sitter
    Quote: Professor
    Galaxy will be even more popular. NATO will not suffer.

    And who will give them a corridor across Russia?


    It's time to drive this nagloseksovskuyu scum from our open spaces! Let them guard their “poppy” in Afghanistan without our participation!
  20. NordUral
    NordUral April 17 2018 09: 04
    0
    And what about the air base in Ulyanovsk?
    1. NEOZ
      NEOZ April 17 2018 10: 34
      0
      Quote: NordUral
      with airbase

      long closed ...
  21. AID.S
    AID.S April 17 2018 09: 18
    0
    Quote: Professor
    Well done. To spite mom freezes to my feet.

    Not at all a fact. Light wedge on Nate did not converge. So, one of.
    Quote: Professor
    and Galaxy will be even more in demand.

    His own involuntarily brother.
    Quote: Professor
    NATO will not suffer.

    As soon as he wants, he will suffer immediately.
  22. Livonetc
    Livonetc April 17 2018 09: 19
    +1
    Quote: NordUral
    And what about the air base in Ulyanovsk?

    Read.
    Everything is already described in detail in the comments above.
    Closed.
  23. trenkkvaz
    trenkkvaz April 17 2018 09: 35
    +1
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Professor
    To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits

    It’s you who are the Jews at first looking for profits ... and helping NATO, and even enduring sanctions, is complete cretinism.


    NATO countries also buy gas from us. Do you think this is also help?
    "Help" is a free service. And ours sell them their goods and services.
  24. Bakht
    Bakht April 17 2018 09: 47
    0
    And why from January 1? Why not right away? Sanctions and sanctions to impose them immediately.
  25. Dead duck
    Dead duck April 17 2018 10: 28
    +3
    Quote: Professor
    Russian companies will lose profits

    There is no ... the market is full of work with interest yes
  26. Antares
    Antares April 17 2018 10: 45
    +2
    Hmm .. the article is rather strange.
    After all, there is an official message from the company. There is material from France (Putin cuts wings laughing )
    https://www.challenges.fr/entreprise/defense/atta
    ques-en-syrie-comment-poutine-coupe-les-ailes-de-
    l-armee-de-l-air-en-stoppant-l-acces-aux-avions-d
    e-transport-antonov_580629
    The French Air Force purchased 225 flight hours from the Volga-Dnepr, while only 75 hours were purchased from Antonov Airlines.

    Hmm. And the biggest buyer there is Germany.
    The largest user of SALIS services was the German armed forces, which reserved 1080 hours for 2017 and 980 hours for 2018,

    The French still use transporters from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
    International Chartering Systems (ICS). This company also used the Ruslans operating in the park of the 224th flight detachment (a subsidiary of the Russian Ministry of Defense).

    What is this article talking about? The fact that sanctions work. Antonov’s certificate, on the one hand, and sanctions, on the other hand, force the Volga Dnepr to refuse to earn substantial income (all the more so an hour of air travel is cheaper than AA-Antonov Airlines 27 versus 37 thousand). The separation of VD and AA led to the fact that VD does not control AA in any way.
    The French can only count
    They can always rely on 14 A400M (if necessary) and C-130, Transall and Casa C295

    But in fact, as noted, An 124 immediately replaces 3 A 400 and takes overall cargo (armored vehicles, helicopters, etc.)
    In general, then summarizing. The need for transportation in hours fell (for example, by 10% this year, compared with the past). The certificate clearly did not agree. Sanctions work.
    GC Volga Dnepr
    The decisions taken by the group’s management not to extend the contract for the delivery of goods by order of the defense departments of NATO countries are, according to Kommersant’s source, “in line with the company's new commercial policy.”

    VD is rapidly falling in the rating of air carriers. (There was no news on this in the VO) Intends to change dramatically. Correct.
    I would like to mention a separate line
    Previously, there was a tendency of a constant decrease in the number of flight hours of the Ukrainian Ruslans against the background of the growth of this indicator in the Volga-Dnepr, starting from 2010.

    Who noted that?
    According to the first results of 2017, the state-owned enterprise Antonov, which is part of the Ukroboronprom Group of Companies, increased the volume of commercial air transportation by 26% compared to 2016.
    The total flight time for 11 months of this year was already 4823,1 hours, while for the whole of 2016 this indicator was at the level of 3831,9 hours. In the last three months alone, Antonov flew 2120 hours

    As well as a separate line, I would like to note the attempt of the VD to fly without an AN certificate.
    AMTES Gmbh company (Leipzig). But if the company moves away from NATO flights, then the attempt will be on commercial flights obvious.
  27. Old26
    Old26 April 17 2018 12: 09
    +2
    Quote: Professor
    Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

    In this case, Oleg, you are wrong. It's not just about profit. We are punished with sanctions. and we must provide services. And I don’t think that the failure of the Volga-Dnepr campaign will affect NATO, because there are 12 such planes. If you believe the article, France bought 2017 AN-225 flight hours in 124. What does it mean. This means that with a maximum load of 120 tons, it flies to a range of 4800 km. That is 6 hours. Round trip - 12 hours. There are 19 flights of ONE airplane per year. If with a load of 80 tons per 7500 km, then, respectively, 12 flights a year with one plane?
    The American counterpart with about the same cargo of 77,5 tons flies true only at 4500. But there are 270 units made. Those same S-5A with the same load - 81. Model S-5V with 118 tons - half a hundred. S-5M with 122 tons - like the Volga-Dnepr Ruslanov - 12 pieces. With such a fleet, the "assistance" of NATO by these planes is scanty. Yes, and I think that they will not remain without work.

    .
    Quote: Pax tecum
    ...from January 1 of next year ceases to provide NATO services

    Those. almost a year later.
    It seems that commerce, even in the event of hostilities against us, will continue to "provide services" or will be pulled to the last, for the contract. Profit, especially in currency - that's all of them.

    After almost 7 months. And they will provide not only because of the profit, but also for sure very serious penalties that can simply ruin the company. Of course I want it to be faster, but not always possible ...

    Quote: Romario_Argo
    The news is simply not fully disclosed. A new military transport air division has been formed in Saratov. So it's time to stop using resources for other purposes.

    And what does a private airline and a new division have in common? Or do you think. What do Vgo-Dnepr requisite Ana?
    1. Professor
      Professor April 17 2018 12: 26
      +3
      Quote: Old26
      We are punished with sanctions. and we must provide services.

      Oh well. What are you then pulling the pipeline to the same bourgeoisie and give your bowels for green candy wrappers? Why is titanium yours on their planes? Well, the cherry on the cake, if your engine the other day brought American ATTENTION !!! military satellite into orbit? Here's a joke: "Either put on your underpants, or remove the cross".

      Quote: Old26
      With such a fleet, the "assistance" of NATO by these planes is scanty. Yes, and I think that they will not remain without work.

      And I’m talking about this, NATO will survive, and customers are not in the queue for air carriers.

      A blow to NATO? Not. This is a blow to the Russian aviation industry and the welfare of Russian citizens.
  28. Old26
    Old26 April 17 2018 12: 11
    0
    Quote: Professor
    Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

    In this case, Oleg, you are wrong. It's not just about profit. We are punished with sanctions. and we must provide services. And I don’t think that the failure of the Volga-Dnepr campaign will affect NATO, because there are 12 such planes. If you believe the article, France bought 2017 AN-225 flight hours in 124. What does it mean. This means that with a maximum load of 120 tons, it flies to a range of 4800 km. That is 6 hours. Round trip - 12 hours. There are 19 flights of ONE airplane per year. If with a load of 80 tons per 7500 km, then, respectively, 12 flights a year with one plane?
    The American S-17, with approximately the same cargo of 77,5 tons, only flies 4500. But 270 of them were made. Those same S-5A with the same load - 81. Model S-5V with 118 tons - half a hundred. S-5M with 122 tons - like the Volga-Dnepr Ruslanov - 12 pieces. With such a fleet, the "assistance" of NATO by these planes is scanty. Yes, and I think that they will not remain without work.

    Quote: Pax tecum
    ...from January 1 of next year ceases to provide NATO services

    Those. almost a year later.
    It seems that commerce, even in the event of hostilities against us, will continue to "provide services" or will be pulled to the last, for the contract. Profit, especially in currency - that's all of them.

    After almost 7 months. And they will provide not only because of the profit, but also for sure very serious penalties that can simply ruin the company. Of course I want it to be faster, but not always possible ...

    Quote: Romario_Argo
    The news is simply not fully disclosed. A new military transport air division has been formed in Saratov. So it's time to stop using resources for other purposes.

    And what does a private airline and a new division have in common? Or do you think. What do Vgo-Dnepr requisite Ana?
    1. ZVO
      ZVO April 17 2018 12: 58
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      It's not just about profit. We are punished with sanctions. and we must provide services.


      I think that everything is a bit more prosaic.
      They say one thing to us many times, but actually something else happens.
      And it is the "other" that they are trying to "hide, veil," etc.
      This has happened many times.
      And our - and even more so, lying has never been shameful.

      The truth is that the resource was worked out even by the Volga-Dnepr.
      There are only five of them flying now, and then on the basis of "cannibalism."
      Here at the moment.
      How many really fly in the videoconferencing? 2-3pcs
      How many really flying in the VD? 2-3pcs
      And no matter how many of them are on the balance sheet.
      Flying heels ...

      There are still no modernization programs.

      The certification system is broken.

      An-124 - closed page.

      No matter how we would like, but with the collapse of cooperation, the project can be considered closed.
      New plane? Unreal. no money even for outline design. Ermak is a fiction.

      Therefore, everything is simple - we cannot fly and fulfill future orders in principle.
      And so it makes no sense to conclude meaningless agreements for the future.
  29. leybshtandartss
    leybshtandartss April 17 2018 12: 47
    0
    why Ruslana they have their own Galaxy s-5.
  30. Old26
    Old26 April 17 2018 13: 03
    0
    Quote: Professor
    Oh well. What are you then pulling the pipeline to the same bourgeoisie and give your bowels for green candy wrappers? Why is titanium yours on their planes? Well, the cherry on the cake, if your engine the other day brought American ATTENTION !!! military satellite into orbit? Here's a joke: "Either put on your underpants, or remove the cross".

    Do not mix everything in one pile. NATO’s direct assistance, while most NATO countries have imposed sanctions on us, is one thing. Here we are in our right with this very wording to terminate cooperation. Gas, titanium and engines are somewhat different. The same engines have already been paid and their non-delivery will affect including and at the factory. The EMNIP article on preventing the use of military loads for withdrawal refers only to the engine mounted on the Antares, the RD-180 was essentially created with American money and for the Americans. Production is localized in Russia. A couple of years will pass and the engine will stop buying.
    Titanium, like gas, is a commodity. We can stop trading in titanium. But what will it give us? The Chinese will come forward and we will be on the sidelines. But with regard to the military structure, actions can definitely be adequate, although, as I already wrote, these flights do not do weather for NATO

    Quote: Professor
    And I’m talking about it, NATO will survive, and customers are not in the queue for air carriers ..

    NATO will survive, and I’m not worried about it. As for air carriers, the air carrier, the air carrier is different. To NATO countries that operate the A-400 with a carrying capacity of 37 tons may not stand. But if you need to transfer 90-100 tons - the choice is not very large. Only we and the USA (well, Ukraine so far)

    Quote: Professor
    A blow to NATO? Not. This is a blow to the Russian aviation industry and the welfare of Russian citizens.

    This is not a blow to NATO, he wrote about it above, but not to our aviation industry. Since AN-124 is no longer available. Welfare of Russian citizens? Which ones? Those involved in air travel? It is possible, but maybe not. Such machines and their operating persons are always in demand.
    1. Professor
      Professor April 17 2018 14: 38
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      Do not mix everything in one pile.

      That is, being a cabman from NATO is bad for the Russian Federation, and supplying raw materials for the NATO economies is already good for the Russian Federation? Where is the logic (rhetorical question). I myself know the answer. These anti-sanctions are only for internal use so NATO is neither cold nor hot from them. Principles, principles, and forfeits (AKA money) for the failure of the contract you suddenly cannot afford and will carry cargo to your enemies before the end of the year so as not to lose money. Gas and titanium, you will never stop selling them. Need money. fellow

      Quote: Old26
      NATO will survive, and I’m not worried about it. As for air carriers, the air carrier, the air carrier is different. To NATO countries that operate the A-400 with a carrying capacity of 37 tons may not stand. But if you need to transfer 90-100 tons - the choice is not very large. Only we and the USA (well, Ukraine so far)

      About the fact that American carriers will increase work, I wrote above. There are no such goods there that they can no longer carry. And Ukraine will also say "deacon" to you.

      Quote: Old26
      This is not a blow to NATO, he wrote about it above, but not to our aviation industry. Since AN-124 is no longer available. Welfare of Russian citizens? Which ones? Those involved in air travel? It is possible, but maybe not. Such machines and their operating persons are always in demand.

      All who are involved in these transportations will feel the lack of work. Supply in the air transportation market exceeds demand. hi
      1. sdc_alex
        sdc_alex April 18 2018 04: 33
        0
        Yes, this is such a corrupt girl, this policy.
        The Americans are not prevented from declaring sanctions with one hand and blaming us for all mortals, and with the other buying our titanium and engines, replenishing our economy, the same is with Europeans and, by the way, with Israel. Fighting the Arabs with one hand, and buying oil from them with the other, and not only ....
  31. samal20123
    samal20123 April 17 2018 16: 31
    +1
    Everyone who is against Russia - Just went to the ass, and on ....!.
  32. NF68
    NF68 April 17 2018 16: 35
    0
    Quote: Professor
    Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool


    Well, how can Russia not be cheated? Will the day be wasted? You are well done too. Shoot more often and more precisely at the Palestinians. And you will live even happier.
  33. Soon Onizhedeti
    Soon Onizhedeti April 17 2018 17: 18
    0
    The huckster in an opriol cannot understand and accept the national interests of a country or people, this is unnatural for its essence !!!
  34. Filxnumx
    Filxnumx April 17 2018 20: 47
    0
    And why only from 01.01.2019, and not earlier? Or is the whole of 2018 the ear contracted? And we, as "reliable partners," are rolling a potential adversary ...
    1. Antares
      Antares April 17 2018 22: 05
      0
      Quote: Fil743
      Or the whole of 2018, the ear has been contracted

      of course. Even the money was paid (Germany bought in advance, though 10% less hours than in 2017)
  35. Megamarcel
    Megamarcel April 17 2018 21: 28
    -1
    Well, where are these planes and flight crews to go? If the Russian economy grew, it could be adapted somehow for domestic freight traffic. And so they will be fun, and the pilots will be hired by the Chinese. In a word grief from the mind.
  36. Strelets1
    Strelets1 April 17 2018 22: 34
    0
    Quote: loginovich
    Quote: Professor
    Well done. good To spite mom freezes to my feet. Russian companies will lose profits, and Galaxy will be even more in demand. NATO will not suffer. fool

    The inhabitants of the promised land are not aware of the concept of pride?

    Hehe ... pride is not a market category, any Jew knows that ...
  37. George Koval
    George Koval April 18 2018 08: 20
    0
    I am amazed by the fact that, it turns out, we threw air NATO equipment! Not an hour to your border? Idiocy!
  38. Romark
    Romark April 18 2018 09: 29
    0
    And why didn’t they do this before ??? And why only from January 1, 2019 ??? They, dogs, have overlaid us from all sides, constantly transferring new forces to our borders AND WITH OUR PLANES !!! .... Some kind of insanity !!!
  39. Strelets1
    Strelets1 April 18 2018 12: 10
    +1
    Quote: alexhol
    It is with you - enemies are neighbors all around. And here, we are just neighbors.

    You just have a short memory, amiable ... Therefore, for you, neo-fascists from Ukraine proclaiming heroes from the SS division "Galicia" are simply "a people enslaved by the Communists, hungry for democracy"
  40. Strelets1
    Strelets1 April 18 2018 12: 22
    0
    Quote: Professor
    That is, being a cabman from NATO is bad for the Russian Federation, and supplying raw materials for the NATO economies is already good for the Russian Federation? Where is the logic (rhetorical question). I myself know the answer.


    I dare say, Professor, the NATO economies are intensively supplying the Russian economy (including the military-industrial complex) with fairly good products (mechanical engineering, electronics, etc.) and technologies that are not available in the Russian Federation today ... If you know all the answers, then explain why they do it ...
    Maybe they need (following your logic) to immediately stop all trade and cooperation with the Russian Federation ...
    Especially now, when its "unreasonable" people once again piled on his neck the "bloody dictator" Putin ...
    And then they climb from all the cracks into Russia like cockroaches, they applauded the joint venture, subsidiaries, I mean ...
  41. Strelets1
    Strelets1 April 18 2018 13: 32
    0
    Quote: Professor
    Principles, principles, and forfeits (AKA money) for disrupting a contract you suddenly cannot afford and will carry cargo to your enemies before the end of the year so that you don’t lose money. Gas and titanium, you will never stop selling them. Need money.


    Of course, we can pay the penalties for breaking the contracts, and stop supplying titanium ... but if you dig around you can still find something like this ...
    Only one begs one - why?
    Quote: Professor
    Principles, principles, and forfeits (AKA money) for disrupting a contract you suddenly cannot afford and will carry cargo to your enemies before the end of the year so that you don’t lose money. Gas and titanium, you will never stop selling them. Need money.


    Of course, we can afford to pay penalties for breaking contracts, and titanium can stop selling to Boeing and Airbus too ...
    The question is not whether we can or not - the question is different - AND WHY?
    Because of principles and pride? Or to hit harder?
    So it is, and on another occasion it was NECESSARY TO ANSWER BEFORE ...
    At least with the expulsion of diplomats ... they promised - they did ...
    Therefore, for sure - the decision will be quite predictable - the current contracts will be brought to the end, but they won’t just conclude new ones ... that’s basically a rational answer ...

    And as far as money is concerned, everyone needs it, well, unless the United States doesn’t feel the need for it - as much as needed, they will print as much ...
    Yes, here Israel - also without problems - as much as the Israeli lobby requires from the US, so many billion USD will be unfastened
  42. serge dill
    serge dill April 18 2018 15: 10
    0
    Well now they will carry Antei, scared a hedgehog naked w --- th
  43. coach colch
    coach colch April 18 2018 15: 27
    0
    So, students studying in "Unfriendly Countries", were invited to return to their homeland, where they will be given places in our educational institutions ...
  44. RoTTor
    RoTTor April 19 2018 01: 40
    0
    Little Ukrainian joy - work will roll over.
    In the most profitable segment of international transport.
    And - for the most beloved and most desired client.
    And all thanks to the Russian Federation.
  45. Loginoff
    Loginoff April 19 2018 10: 18
    0
    And why are American sanctions effective immediately, and ours only at the beginning of next year?
  46. LIP
    LIP April 19 2018 14: 40
    0
    Let drag their equipment and other loads dragging. And across the ocean on gondolas that will be taken from Italy.
  47. Verkhomnapule
    Verkhomnapule April 19 2018 16: 30
    0
    yeah, selfish interest comes first, finally what the hell are we helping the NATO people in some way? Madhouse, being a cab from a potential enemy is something !!!
  48. Georges Pompidou
    Georges Pompidou April 22 2018 10: 48
    +1
    It is very strange that Russia is still doing this. These shipments had to be stopped back in 2014. It turns out that we bring our enemies closer to our borders. recourse
  49. Sergey Gorn
    Sergey Gorn April 22 2018 15: 03
    0
    It was everything, it seems to me, exactly the opposite. The Russian campaign was simply refused a contract due to sanctions.
  50. lukewarm
    lukewarm April 23 2018 14: 43
    0
    Great news! After the Crimea, 4 years of sanctions, the war in Syria and even at our doorstep. And they’re just here !!! Directly pleased