Few months left: What does the United States strike on Syria mean?

20
An indicative strike by the American coalition on Syria was no surprise to anyone. Anyway, he was waited for several weeks. On Saturday night, NATO ships and aircraft launched an order of 110 cruise missiles at targets in the Arab Republic.

The “Civilized West” has once again shown that international law exists only for Russia, China and other opponents of the Anglo-Saxons, but it cannot in any way extend to London and Washington. The Americans, in a manner peculiar to them, simultaneously acted as an accuser, judge and executioner.



However, a strike on Syria will have far-reaching consequences, not only for Damascus, but also for Tehran. It is safe to say that within a month the United States will withdraw from the "nuclear agreement" with Iran, thereby unleashing its hands for further actions against the Persians. The Middle East is waiting for a big war and our country will not be able to sit aside. The first thing that Russia needs to do in the near future is to significantly strengthen the defense of Syria and Iran.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 16 2018 18: 01
    The first thing Russia needs to do in the near future is to significantly strengthen the air defense of Syria and Iran.

    That was announced ... and by the way, a big war has been going on in the BV for 6 years now. Now Trump has simply raised rates. For Syria, a battle with the mattresses direct sooner or later should happen. And the second missile strike will not keep itself waiting. The question is how much we will be ready at this moment.
    1. 0
      April 16 2018 19: 32
      On that theater, we will not be ready. More precisely, we have a deliberately losing situation there against the Americans. We will not be able to supply the group in a real collision. It is hoped that there will be no more strikes. In principle, given the outbreak of a trade war with China, America is better for us to have at least neutrals. Therefore, I think, he will not worsen, despite the enormous pressure on him.
      1. 0
        April 22 2018 22: 13
        Quote: konstantin68
        On that theater, we will not be ready. More precisely, we have a deliberately losing situation there against the Americans. We will not be able to supply the group in a real collision.

        Is it easier to organize supplies for mattresses across the ocean? Marine communications will require huge costs for their protection from the enemy’s submarine fleet.
        1. 0
          April 23 2018 06: 09
          The Naglo-Saxons in Syria's circle of bases are poked, thanks to this they can carry out more massive attacks. Ammunition tends to end, equipment breaks, and people are not iron. And we do not have direct access to our bases in Syria. Either Turkey or Iraq, the Turks are NATO, and in a conflict there is practically no hope for them, there is only one way through Iran and Iraq, and the latter also has amer bases. So, it will be hard to help us drag it there.
  2. 0
    April 16 2018 18: 03
    Not only us! China also strengthens Iran by deploying ICBMs on the borders of this country, and also helps with air defense ..
    1. +6
      April 16 2018 18: 09
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      China also strengthens Iran by deploying ICBMs on its borders

      ========
      This, where is it you, dear BORDER of China and Iran have seen ??? Can you tell me, or is my card "not correct" ???
      ----
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      and also helps with air defense ..

      ======
      I really didn’t know that Iran was buying Chinese complexes .... Probably behind the times .....
      1. +2
        April 16 2018 18: 44
        Information on military-technical cooperation (MTC) between China and Iran is not news. It is necessary to skip less on the Independence Square with a saucepan on his head and shout Putin ....., These countries have long had close ties in the military field. Suffice it to say that in recent years, the volume of deliveries of Chinese weapons and military equipment to Iran amounted to billions of US dollars. The border calculation was not so expressed. It is more correct to say closer to the borders of Iran from Pakistan.
      2. +2
        April 17 2018 11: 52
        Well, in Belarus they sell oysters)))))). Why not assume that Iran bought “air defense” from “China”;). Moreover, China is actively selling weapons systems putting it on sanctions ......
        - Why did you sell 10 ballistic missiles ????? We have forbidden.
        - We did not sell rockets. We sold a drilling rig and 10 pipes with jet engines at the end for thawing permafrost ..... In order to obtain drinking water in the Arabian desert. Here we’ll sell more primuses and the scribe will come to you in the sense that they will be able to open a scribal farm.
        ;)
  3. 0
    April 16 2018 18: 36
    strange advertising crawls on the text
    I won’t pay-subscription. Observance of propriety- do not save money to the site

    and the war will be limited - financiers order a war and they will only take what they can seize in effective hands and exploit.
    that beyond their managerial capabilities will be left to the old owners.
    before bringing to the "normal" state previously captured
  4. +1
    April 16 2018 20: 51
    Any stick has two ends ... If the US withdraws from a nuclear deal ... Iran will also automatically drop out of the same deal .... Given that it supplies North Korea’s oil ... It’s quite possible that it suddenly has several nuclear bombs .... In this case, this is a problem for both Israel ... and the Gulf countries ...
  5. +3
    April 16 2018 21: 06
    Do not roll your lip. The Americans will not get off now. I mean not only the USA, but also All their allies. The British have such fun, poison the fox. So now we are acting as this fox.
    Blow to Syria. Uriapatriots ridicule the United States with a missile strike. Like smart missiles beat Soviet missiles. Or maybe it was stupid, and old missiles? Where did the part of the missiles firing at the airfield last year go? After all, we have not received an answer.
    Or maybe the purpose of the airstrike was not to hit the Syrian army, but to probe our radar settings, frequencies. After all, they then worked in BATTLE mode, tracking and conducting missile launches?
    We cannot cover Syria and Iran. We ourselves do not know how we will be hit. Having surrendered the GDR, having lost Ukraine (I think for many years), we laid bare our borders, created an enclave of the Kaliningrad region. Passed Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. I am silent about Poland. Surrendered to Cuba with Lurgas. As Shevardnadze did not surrender the Kuril Islands - I can’t imagine.
    Therefore, we need to hold troops and modernize air defense and missile forces to cover our borders. And this is a lot of money. This is a type of sanction bonus.
    1. +1
      April 16 2018 21: 42
      Quote: SCHWERIN
      As Shevardnadze did not surrender the Kuril Islands - I can’t imagine.


      Maybe the price with the main "democrats" on the planet Earth agreed with her?
      1. 0
        April 16 2018 21: 53
        White fox....
  6. +1
    April 17 2018 11: 41
    "Recharging"
    No one will succeed. but later. The corridor of time has not yet been exhausted. Whoever starts first will most likely ......... lose.
  7. 0
    April 17 2018 16: 37
    Something like how we would need to bring more truthful information to Western society, primarily the United States, Britain and France. Ask the people of these countries how they feel about the fact that their governments are so ineptly and uselessly squandering their money that they lead the whole world to nuclear war with such manic stubbornness and for what they are doing it, for which they systematically lie to their people. May try to revive the teleconference, as if in the cultural sphere or something else. Well, something needs to be done with the help of public diplomacy if officials of the governments of these countries, unashamedly, lead their peoples to Hell.
    1. +1
      April 17 2018 17: 06
      Quote: Poor man
      Something like how we would need to bring more truthful information to Western society, primarily the United States, Britain and France. Ask the people of these countries how they feel about the fact that their governments are so ineptly and uselessly squandering their money that they lead the whole world to nuclear war with such manic stubbornness and for what they are doing it, for which they systematically lie to their people. May try to revive the teleconference, as if in the cultural sphere or something else. Well, something needs to be done with the help of public diplomacy if officials of the governments of these countries, unashamedly, lead their peoples to Hell.


      Almost all of this information in the West by all not frail forces will simply be blocked. And those who will persistently distribute it will at least be thoroughly clamped and securely and for a long time planted under any pretext.
  8. 0
    April 17 2018 17: 10
    Gossip began to appear in the German media today

    https://web.de/magazine/politik/syrien-konflikt/k
    rieg-syrien-frankreich-fuerchtet-verschwinden-bew
    eisen-chemieangriff-xnumx

    with reference to the fact that in France someone especially ill on their heads had already expressed the idea that Russia had eliminated all traces of the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian Duma. I won’t be surprised if these same types of people claim that Russia and Syria hid all the corpses of those allegedly killed by “chemistry”.
  9. 0
    April 17 2018 23: 05
    I understand that they are strengthening in full swing. And the war is waiting. Vladimir Putin has not in vain declared that international chaos is approaching. These are military operations with a little predictable result.
  10. 0
    April 21 2018 09: 48
    Yes people ... We must prepare for war! How sad it is ... I just don’t understand the Americans! Who told them that America will not suffer in this war?!? Is it really bad with brains? fool
  11. 0
    1 May 2018 11: 08
    It seems that the next 6 years, Putin will not be up to the economy? The state agency passed Shoigu 29 calibers. It will not be enough ?!