The White House confirmed the plans for the withdrawal of troops from Syria

29
The United States plans the early withdrawal of its troops from Syria, as previously announced by President Donald Trump, reports Interfax statement by the representative of the White House, Sarah Sanders.



The objectives of the US mission in Syria remained unchanged. The president made it clear that he wanted the American forces back home as soon as possible.
said sanders.

She clarified that the US goal in Syria remains "the complete defeat of the IG (the group is prohibited in the Russian Federation) and the creation of conditions to prevent its return."

We hope that our regional allies and partners will assume greater responsibility, both financially and militarily, for security in the region,
added a representative of the administration.

Earlier, Trump said that after the withdrawal of the American contingent of Syria "other countries should take care".
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 16 2018 15: 14
    Yeah, only a dozen more missile attacks will inflict, destroy peaceful cities, and happy will withdraw its legitimate gangs, called the United States Army!
    1. +12
      April 16 2018 15: 16
      We know such allies!
      1. +6
        April 16 2018 15: 17
        The president made it clear that he wants US forces to RETURN home as soon as possible,

        Fresh tradition, but hard to believe!
        1. +2
          April 16 2018 15: 22
          "The objectives of the US mission in Syria have remained unchanged," said Sanders.

          This is closer to the truth. Really, US proxy war in Syria remains unchanged policy for Washington. This can be believed.

        2. +3
          April 16 2018 15: 27
          The President made it clear that he wants US forces to RETURN home as soon as possible.
          ,

          He wants something. But nobody takes his Wishlist seriously. How many years have been withdrawn from Afghanistan, so these conclusions are not visible end to end.
          1. +2
            April 16 2018 16: 54
            Quote: Borik
            How many years have been withdrawn from Afghanistan, so these conclusions are not visible end to end.

            But who will abandon the cherished poppy-heroin plantations? The United States has probably put a Colombian cartel in the belt for drugs ...
            1. 0
              April 16 2018 19: 51
              Macron is upset! He only crowed that he convinced Trump to leave the troops, and he again for his ... bully
              For Trump to promise to leave Afghanistan, I don’t remember. Let them at least knock over from Syria - you can immediately give the order! hi
        3. +2
          April 16 2018 15: 28
          Believe, not believe, what is the question then? We will see!
          1. +3
            April 16 2018 15: 53
            Quote: rocket757
            Believe, not believe, what is the question then?

            Probably still in Putin! How Putin will look at this desire of Trump and his behavior.

          2. +2
            April 16 2018 16: 06
            Quote: rocket757
            Believe, not believe, what is the question then? We will see!

            What is there to watch? Maybe they want to leave, but not earlier than us.
    2. +1
      April 16 2018 15: 45
      Well, that's probably the price for saving the face that Russia demanded from the United States. We will soon find out whether it is or the United States will again go to deceive.
      1. +2
        April 16 2018 16: 53
        Quote: Wend
        Well, that's probably the price for saving the face that Russia demanded from the United States. We will soon find out whether it is or the United States will again go to deceive.


        so who won then I did not understand recourse recourse
        1. +1
          April 16 2018 17: 00
          Quote: vorobey
          Quote: Wend
          Well, that's probably the price for saving the face that Russia demanded from the United States. We will soon find out whether it is or the United States will again go to deceive.


          so who won then I did not understand recourse recourse

          It is important not who won, but who screwed up. And this is not Syria and not Russia.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. 0
    April 16 2018 15: 17
    More and more misunderstandings. Where did he get in? And what got out ...
    1. 0
      April 16 2018 15: 23
      he climbed as always, but it didn’t work, and so much so that it’s not profitable to continue, so he got out
  4. +1
    April 16 2018 15: 19
    and bearded men should be sent to the FSA after their soldiers
  5. 0
    April 16 2018 15: 22
    achievements of the western coalition:

    destruction of an empty laboratory building. Mission accomplished we are withdrawing troops
  6. 0
    April 16 2018 15: 23
    As in a children's reading room about nine black children, in the end the latter is hung. So the Pentagon is up to the timing.
  7. 0
    April 16 2018 15: 23
    Well, if Tramp was firing "by the road", then he might pull the "stirrup". In any case, his "eyes and ears" will remain, and we have love with Israel
  8. 0
    April 16 2018 15: 25
    And will they take the bearded with them? Their own feeding.)
    1. 0
      April 16 2018 16: 19
      Quote: jncnfdybr
      And will they take the bearded with them? Their own feeding.)

      "Consumables" just write off.
  9. 0
    April 16 2018 15: 30
    Come on...
    They’ve been leaving Afghanistan and Iraq for ten years now, they still can’t get out of it ..
  10. LMN
    +4
    April 16 2018 15: 44
    But on the other hand, what should they do there?
    There is a formal reason, the igil is defeated. The actual reason is already inaccessible, because Russia unexpectedly turned out to be too tough, but Russia is there for a long time. Assad’s regime cannot be overthrown.
    What should they do there? Spend money on maintaining the bases? Periodically spend "200 lyam" on salvos on sheds? request
    They can and will be sure to finance the Basmachi, and without their contingent.
    In my opinion, a very logical decision, because there is no sense. In the United States, they will ask questions: we are not bombing, we are not shooting ... what are we doing there?
    1. +3
      April 16 2018 17: 06
      Quote: LMN
      In my opinion, a very logical decision, because there is no sense. In the United States, they will ask questions: we are not bombing, we are not shooting ... what are we doing there?


      but how to master the budget money .. don’t shoot the bombs .. 700 lards it’s not for ice cream and a movie ... then an integrated approach is needed for development .. wassat wassat
      1. LMN
        +3
        April 16 2018 18: 05
        Quote: vorobey
        Quote: LMN
        In my opinion, a very logical decision, because there is no sense. In the United States, they will ask questions: we are not bombing, we are not shooting ... what are we doing there?


        but how to master the budget money .. don’t shoot the bombs .. 700 lards it’s not for ice cream and a movie ... then an integrated approach is needed for development .. wassat wassat

        Well, for this thing, they will receive additional funding at home. They have already received 800.000 lyam after (!) Putin’s speech. Right now at a closed meeting they will decide that more injections are needed, since it did not work out in Syria. Is it really a problem for them? Fi. .)) Nothing personal, just business wink
  11. +1
    April 16 2018 15: 55
    Forgot to say in which year they will withdraw .. smile
  12. 0
    April 16 2018 19: 28
    Quote: Tatiana
    The president made it clear that he wants US forces to RETURN home as soon as possible,

    Fresh tradition, but hard to believe!

    "Do not listen to what they say, see what they are doing" (c).
  13. 0
    April 17 2018 00: 03
    Possessed even before their own ISIS?
  14. 0
    April 17 2018 09: 40
    Yankees, it's time to go that home ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"