Military Review

"We made them": Syrian anti-aircraft gunners told how they shot down "Tomahawks"

76
On the night of April 14, a joint aggression of the USA, Great Britain and France against Syria took place. Three NATO countries launched around 110 various types of cruise missiles at targets in Syrian territory. According to the Russian General Staff, 77 missiles were intercepted by air defense systems of the SAR. There are no casualties as a result of the attack, material damage is estimated at several million dollars.


The most important military installations, such as airfields, communications centers and command posts, were not damaged. The efficiency ratio of the Syrian air defense at these sites was striving for unity.

According to the Syrian anti-aircraft gunners, Western missiles have become difficult targets for them. They put active interference and flew at a rather low altitude. Nevertheless, Soviet-made radars were able to correctly fire missile missiles at the Tomahawks that threatened the Syrian army.

76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS April 16 2018 11: 18
    +5
    70% of downed axes. Well done Syrians. The result of the missile strike was reduced to zero. The effect of this blow turned out to be negative primarily for mattresses and their "smart rockets." Old Soviet air defense systems have shown their effectiveness to the world now.
    1. Serge Gorely
      Serge Gorely April 16 2018 11: 20
      +6
      Quote: NEXUS
      70% of downed axes. Well done Syrians.

      LiSiTsyn was replaced by Ibn Ivan and Abu Ilya ...
      1. svp67
        svp67 April 16 2018 11: 28
        +5
        Quote: Serge Gorely
        LiSiTsyn was replaced by Ibn Ivan and Abu Ilya ...

        Why shift? No, they have been living there for a long time.

        1. Serge Gorely
          Serge Gorely April 16 2018 11: 32
          0
          So I'm exactly the same. Fighters from the Arabs ....
          1. Sergey-svs
            Sergey-svs April 16 2018 11: 44
            +8
            Quote: NEXUS
            70% of downed axes. Well done Syrians.

            The real effectiveness of the raid on Syria.
            It seems that the losers were planning the operation. negative Air defense forces did not suffer any losses. yes For other objects:
            Four missiles participated in the strike at the DUVALI airfield - all shot down. 100% efficiency
            At the DUMEIR airfield there are 12 missiles, all shot down. 100%
            There are 18 missiles at the BLEI airfield, all shot down. 100%
            There are 12 missiles at the SHAIRAT airfield, all shot down. 100%
            Airfields were not affected.
            Of the 9 missiles launched at the unused MEZZE airfield, 5 were shot down. 56%
            Of the 16 missiles at the HOMS aerodrome, 13 were destroyed. No serious damage was observed. 81%
            30 missiles participated in the strike on targets in the area of ​​settlements BARZ and JARAMANI. Of these, 7 missiles were shot down. These objects, allegedly related to the so-called military chemical program of Damascus, are partially destroyed. Moreover, they have not been used for a long time, there were no people or equipment on them.
            This Jaramani, apparently, was not covered at all, but 7 shot down, which were coming at him, or the aircraft banged or somewhere along the way. B1B was probably bombed altogether in the desert. There is infa that the strategists did not even reach the launch point of the AGM-158. They say they’ve made a mistake, but I think they just fell asleep. The pilots point is not iron, it is a bench press! But, perhaps, our REBs "deployed" the GPS system, and the Omerikosy have long forgotten how to use the navigational line. lol
            So, the air defense efficiency is not 70%, but close to 100%! And these are our ancient air defense systems. tongue
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS April 16 2018 12: 11
              +3
              Quote: Sergey-svs
              So, the air defense efficiency is not 70%, but close to 100%! And these are our ancient air defense systems.

              According to the results and the damage caused, yes, close to 100%. And I talked about the percentage of interceptions. But you are right, you need to look at the result of the damage caused, which I have repeatedly said.
              hi
              1. Beltasir matyagu
                Beltasir matyagu April 16 2018 19: 59
                +3
                I think the Syrian ZRS a little twisted and there are not quite the same characteristics as in the basic version, not without the help of the Russians of course. Could take into account the Yugoslav experience. There, similar manipulations with Soviet air defense were mentioned. Something they knocked out of the category of prodigy is not to mention now. Perhaps made the modernization and the Syrians.
            2. Vita vko
              Vita vko April 16 2018 13: 15
              +6
              Quote: Sergey-svs
              air defense efficiency is not 70%, but close to 100%! And these are our ancient SAM

              Do not rejoice ahead of time. From the point of view of air defense, the conditions for the combat use of US and British missiles were close to ideal. The calculation commander, although it indicates the presence of interference, but their intensity was clearly small, in addition, more than one air defense object was not hit. From all this we can make an unambiguous conclusion that this strike was of an intelligence-demonstration nature. Now, US analysts will be able to create a model of Syria’s air defense with 90% certainty, including Russian air defense systems, and prepare the next strike in 1-2 months. To prevent this, Russia has the only chance to deliver S-300 air defense systems and Russian combat crews to Syria within a month. It is impossible to prepare Syrian settlements in such a short time.
              1. Beltasir matyagu
                Beltasir matyagu April 16 2018 20: 04
                +3
                And we probably are fools and do not understand the war? It may turn out suddenly that the air is ten times denser than the roast fry like in hell and it is not where they thought, but the main tracking points worked passively. And under the keel of each destroyer there was already a bomb. You never know
                1. Vita vko
                  Vita vko April 16 2018 20: 22
                  0
                  Quote: Beltasir Matyagu
                  And under the keel of each destroyer there was already a bomb. You never know

                  belay
              2. wvg
                wvg April 16 2018 21: 43
                0
                STARTING lasted for an hour! How many times during this time could all the starters be drowned? Or do you think that the Russian Federation really turned a cheek = they say beat, you bastards, you still won’t get to Moscow ...
              3. Nikolaevich I
                Nikolaevich I April 17 2018 02: 49
                +2
                Quote: Vita VKO
                . From all this we can make an unambiguous conclusion that this strike was of an intelligence-demonstration nature. Now, US analysts will be able to create with 90% certainty a Syrian air defense model, including Russian air defense systems, and prepare the next strike in the course of 1-2 months.

                And I have the same opinion ...... "Serious relations," apparently still to come ....
                Quote: Vita VKO
                within a month, deliver to Syria the S-300 air defense systems and Russian combat crews. It is impossible to prepare Syrian settlements in such a short time.

                Fir-trees! And I thought about that .... Kamrad! fellow drinks
                PS Actually, Syrian air defense needs almost complete rearmament ... it’s advisable to “leave” only “Buki”, “Osu” .... well, perhaps, also “Pechora-2M”. But ... "easy to say, harder to do ...". Russia is not so rich now that it can engage in “charity” on such a scale. Although ...... there is “more to see”! It is possible that for Russia the "Syrian" situation is: "either pan or disappeared!" The defeat of Russia in Syria could result in huge losses in the near future, not only in the political aspect, but also in the economic one. Russia's victory, even at a high price, can bring enormous political and economic benefits, if not in the immediate, then in a slightly more distant future.
            3. Sasha_Sar
              Sasha_Sar April 17 2018 15: 42
              +1
              So they don’t get used to shoot tractors in the desert laughing
              1. Aaron Zawi
                Aaron Zawi April 17 2018 16: 12
                0
                Quote: Sasha_Sar
                So they don’t get used to shoot tractors in the desert laughing

                They are not made with a finger. Try hard.
                1. Viktor Petrov
                  Viktor Petrov 1 May 2018 08: 37
                  0
                  Pay attention to the Shell with the Syrian crew, now it is clear where such effectiveness comes from.
      2. Baloo
        Baloo April 16 2018 12: 44
        +3
        Quote: Serge Gorely
        Quote: NEXUS
        70% of downed axes. Well done Syrians.

        LiSiTsyn was replaced by Ibn Ivan and Abu Ilya ...

        "We made them": Syrian anti-aircraft gunners told how they shot down "Tomahawks"
        Quote: Serge Gorely
        "We made them": Syrian anti-aircraft gunners told how they shot down "Tomahawks"

        Good luck fighting! drinks good hi
    2. NEOZ
      NEOZ April 16 2018 11: 28
      +6
      Quote: NEXUS
      shown to the whole world

      I see another picture ...
      podpinDosniki can crave for any country under any pretext and they won’t have anything ...
      it can be any country without nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles ... absolutely any ... you can just bomb the country into the Stone Age and that's all ...
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS April 16 2018 11: 31
        +5
        Quote: NEOZ
        henchmen can crave for any country on any pretext and they won’t be anything ...

        Hence the conclusion-Buy Russian air defense systems and sleep peacefully! wink
        1. NEOZ
          NEOZ April 16 2018 11: 34
          +2
          Quote: NEXUS
          Russian air defense systems and sleep peacefully

          SAM do not save ... they raise the price of bombing in the Stone Age ...
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS April 16 2018 11: 35
            0
            Quote: NEOZ
            SAM do not save ...

            Reflecting a missile strike is it not saving? Are you serious?
            1. NEOZ
              NEOZ April 16 2018 11: 48
              +2
              Quote: NEXUS
              Are you seriously?

              of course seriously.
              coefficient 0.7
              this means getting 30 missiles out of 100
              300 of 1000
              the United States has 4500+ allies and these are just axes ....
              The United States can easily concentrate approximately 1500 axes on any theater.
              PS
              What are the chances of a boxer who enters the ring and is only respected?
              I suspect that no ...
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS April 16 2018 12: 14
                +3
                Quote: NEOZ
                coefficient 0.7

                Excuse me, if the KR flies, let’s say into the barn, and not into the hangar with airplanes, why should it bring down it? Look at the statistics of intercepts at aerodromes-100%! I repeat, look not at the interception coefficient, but at the damage caused by the unassembled missiles.
                1. NEOZ
                  NEOZ April 16 2018 13: 48
                  +1
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  if the KR flies let's say to the barn

                  Who is sending KR to the barn ???
                  how many will reflect the air defense of the SAR if there is a salvo of 1000 axes? + aviation with anti-radar missiles?
                  I think I clearly expressed my idea that if you do not cause damage to the amers then the air defense of the SAR will be destroyed sooner or later ....
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS April 16 2018 13: 51
                    +5
                    Quote: NEOZ
                    how many will reflect the air defense of the SAR if there is a salvo of 1000 axes?

                    Are you sure that the carriers will SUCCESS to shoot the whole thousand before the moment when they are sent to the bottom of the fish to feed?
                    Quote: NEOZ
                    that if you do not cause damage to the amers then the air defense of the SAR will be destroyed sooner or later ....

                    Did you listen carefully to what the representative of the General Staff said about the conditions for the destruction of both missiles and CARRIERS?
                    1. NEOZ
                      NEOZ April 16 2018 15: 28
                      +1
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      listened to what he said

                      spoke, I say, and I will speak ...
                      GDP said that it would not allow the killing of civilians in the Donbass ...
                      but that is not the point of our discussion.
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      representative of the General Staff

                      and where does the General Staff of the Russian Federation?
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Hence the conclusion-Buy Russian air defense systems and sleep peacefully

                      whose words are these? Yours? then add that not only the air defense system but also the contingent of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation ...
                      you didn’t disclose how air defense can stop aggression ... so it cannot be! can only increase the price of victory ...
                  2. Baby sitter
                    Baby sitter April 16 2018 22: 34
                    0
                    for 1500 axes still need to find static military targets. although you can schools, hospitals, power plants ....
    3. Vend
      Vend April 16 2018 11: 28
      +4
      Quote: NEXUS
      70% of downed axes. Well done Syrians. The result of the missile strike was reduced to zero. The effect of this blow turned out to be negative primarily for mattresses and their "smart rockets." Old Soviet air defense systems have shown their effectiveness to the world now.

      And disgraced the latest US missiles. I did not take into account this alignment.
    4. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 15: 30
      +2
      Quote: NEXUS
      70% of downed axes. Well done Syrians. The result of the missile strike was reduced to zero. The effect of this blow turned out to be negative primarily for mattresses and their "smart rockets." Old Soviet air defense systems have shown their effectiveness to the world now.

      Yes well done. It remains only to look at the wreckage of these rackets with a length of 6.25m and a diameter of 0.5m.

      You can’t hide it. There, all of Syria should be bombarded with fragments of missiles and their engines.
      For example, when the French hit the IS with the MBDA SCALP EG rocket, they immediately showed what they got on the head.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS April 16 2018 20: 10
        +2
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        It remains only to look at the wreckage of these rackets with a length of 6.25m and a diameter of 0.5m

        Show me the results of the "achieved goals" of a missile strike ... it’s more difficult to hide destroyed airfields, planes, etc.
        And here’s a video for you, so that you don’t particularly doubt ...
        1. Aaron Zawi
          Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 21: 20
          +2
          Quote: NEXUS

          Show me the results of the "achieved goals" of the missile strike ...
          and they claim that they didn’t shoot at airfields. From the word at all. And those three goals that were announced, they are amazed. They at least demonstrate something. But MORF recently, only this.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS April 16 2018 21: 27
            +3
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            and they claim that they didn’t shoot at airfields.

            Why should I believe tweetrades and not my MO, explain?
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            But MORF recently, only this.

            Our MO, VKS and military squeezed ISIS over three years ... despite the fact that your US ALLIES fiddled there before our military came to Syria for 2 years! Moreover, what did Israel actually do in the destruction of the terrorist organization ISIS and AN-NUSRA? And I know your answer, Israel does not consider them terrorist organizations. That is, the fact of cutting heads. Public executions, terrorist attacks around the world in your opinion is not a reason to consider them terrorists.
            And how many fireflies were put to death by mattresses in Mosul? Tell me about Libya and Iraq, and the financing of al Qaeda, ISIS, AN-NUSRA ... It is very interesting to listen.
            1. Aaron Zawi
              Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 22: 08
              +3
              Quote: NEXUS

              Why should I believe tweetrades and not my MO, explain?
              Of course not. But why should anyone other than you believe him?

              Our MO, VKS and military for three years squeezed ISIS ... despite the fact that your US ALLIES fiddled there before the arrival of our military 2 in Syria!
              yeah. And in Iraq, where there was 90% of ISIS forces who fought with them? Who did not give up the north of Syria to the yoke
              Moreover, what did Israel actually do in the destruction of the terrorist organization ISIS and AN-NUSRA? And I know your answer, Israel does not consider them terrorist organizations. That is, the fact of cutting heads. Public executions, terrorist attacks around the world in your opinion is not a reason to consider them terrorists.
              Firstly, no need to answer for me. Secondly, we did nothing in Syria. Because officially recognized in Israel as ISIS terrorists and Al-Nusra fought against the Assad Ba'athists to whom we have the same attitude. We spit on those and others. But Egypt, our country helps to fight ISIS in the Sinai. Our aviation attacked their positions more than 200 times.
              And how many fireflies were put to death by mattresses in Mosul? Tell me about Libya and Iraq, and the financing of al Qaeda, ISIS, AN-NUSRA ... It is very interesting to listen.

              Is it special or during street battles? I only read about the financing of terrorists by Western countries in your press, what can I tell you. You know us better.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS April 16 2018 22: 20
                +4
                Quote: Aron Zaavi
                And in Iraq, where there were 90% of ISIS forces, who fought with them?

                You’re funny ... I’ll remind you that, before the US invasion of Iraq, there was no ISIS. Question, then where did it come from later? M. It jumped out like a pimple out of nowhere?
                Quote: Aron Zaavi
                Our aviation attacked their positions more than 200 times.

                And at the same time bombed the position of the Syrians, making it easier for the Ishilovites. What are you fair and humane.
                Quote: Aron Zaavi
                Is it special or during street battles?

                A photo of which Mosul at that time and video can not be found ... and during street battles ironed apparently peaceful neighborhoods. As they say, so as not to miss the terrorist. Apparently so ...
                1. Aaron Zawi
                  Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 23: 05
                  0
                  Quote: NEXUS

                  You’re funny ... I’ll remind you that, before the US invasion of Iraq, there was no ISIS. Question, then where did it come from later? M. It jumped out like a pimple out of nowhere?

                  Hello. And who made Iraq an enemy of all the surrounding countries? By the way, a little time has passed between the war of 2003 of the year and the rise of ISIS in 2014.
                  And at the same time bombed the position of the Syrians, making it easier for the Ishilovites. What are you fair and humane.
                  Yes? And how many tanks, guns and soldiers did the Syrians lose from our attacks?
                  A photo of which Mosul at that time and video can not be found ... and during street battles ironed apparently peaceful neighborhoods. As they say, so as not to miss the terrorist. Apparently so ...
                  and find a photo of Grozny? Or were there more difficult conditions?
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS April 16 2018 23: 09
                    0
                    Quote: Aron Zaavi
                    and find a photo of Grozny?

                    Wow ... they remembered for Grozny. Say again that there were no terrorists there, but fighters for freedom of the not recognized Ichkeria. And then we just learned to fight the terrorists.
                    1. Aaron Zawi
                      Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 23: 49
                      0
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Quote: Aron Zaavi
                      and find a photo of Grozny?

                      Wow ... they remembered for Grozny. Say again that there were no terrorists there, but fighters for freedom of the not recognized Ichkeria. And then we just learned to fight the terrorists.

                      Of course the terrorists. And in Mosul, of course, schoolgirls from elementary grades fought.
                      1. the lord
                        the lord April 17 2018 04: 49
                        0
                        Judging by how your "allies" have been managing them for a long time, yes, it’s schoolgirls. Amers on women’s hand raised for a long time)))))
                        And about the fact that a little time has passed from the moment of the invasion of Iraq and the emergence of igil, it is epic. And what, the Americans dumped somewhere from Iraq during this time? Or do you want to mumble. that igi stole it all from amers during this time?
                  2. NG inform
                    NG inform 8 May 2018 19: 37
                    -1
                    In Iraq and Syria everything was more or less approx. But I like your proposal to bomb Israel: ALL neighbors hate it, it illegally owns nuclear weapons, it is a dangerous aggressor. Much more dangerous than Iraq, it is necessary to bomb.
  2. Vlad Morozov
    Vlad Morozov April 16 2018 11: 23
    0
    It is good that launchers are not crammed with electronics. Otherwise, they would have been cut down. What not to say about Western counterparts
  3. kipod
    kipod April 16 2018 11: 26
    +3
    can someone show a picture of a downed ax?
    1. Serge Gorely
      Serge Gorely April 16 2018 11: 29
      +8
      Quote: kipod
      can someone show a picture of a downed ax?

      You are already upset. And then there’s a photo .... It smacks of masochism ...
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather April 16 2018 11: 34
        +3
        Quote: kipod
        can someone show a picture of a downed ax?

        from the downed "ax" is something left?
        1. tlauicol
          tlauicol April 16 2018 11: 46
          +3
          Quote: Dead Day
          Quote: kipod
          can someone show a picture of a downed ax?

          from the downed "ax" is something left?


          the most interesting thing is that the peasants of Yugoslavia, Iraq, Iran, Libya find American, Russian, European Kyrgyz Republic on the same day in the desert, mountains, forests - even the fuel still burns quite often
      2. Baloo
        Baloo April 16 2018 12: 46
        +4
        Quote: Serge Gorely
        Quote: kipod
        can someone show a picture of a downed ax?

        You are already upset. And then there’s a photo .... It smacks of masochism ...

        Hi Seryoga! I shake my hand for a worthy answer to the polygonal drinks good
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS April 16 2018 11: 34
      +3
      Quote: kipod
      can someone show a picture of a downed ax?

      Or can you provide a photo of the objects that destroyed the axes? They beat it at several airfields ... and something after the strike, these airfields continue to function, as before the shelling.
      1. tlauicol
        tlauicol April 16 2018 13: 28
        +1
        strike at airfields was not even considered if you read IN
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS April 16 2018 22: 25
          0
          Quote: Tlauicol
          strike at airfields was not even considered if you read IN

          Well, of course ... apparently the report on the interceptions of our General Staff is also a linden ... laughing
          1. Aaron Zawi
            Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 23: 06
            0
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: Tlauicol
            strike at airfields was not even considered if you read IN

            Well, of course ... apparently the report on the interceptions of our General Staff is also a linden ... laughing

            Until it proves otherwise, this is propaganda.
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS April 16 2018 23: 15
              0
              Quote: Aron Zaavi
              Until it proves otherwise, it’s propaganda

              So screams of mattresses and Trump on Twitter mean the truth, and not propaganda? Mattresses surround us with missile defense systems, keep the NATO bloc (why interesting), sanctions, inform war, and so on ... believe them that we are such terrible barbarians .
              1. tlauicol
                tlauicol April 17 2018 07: 10
                0
                propaganda on both sides request If an American and a Russian lie, then this does not mean that ours are telling the truth, because Yankees lied
            2. stalkerwalker
              stalkerwalker April 16 2018 23: 22
              0
              Quote: Aron Zaavi
              Until it proves otherwise, this is propaganda.

              Did they learn from Mrs. May that they cry out in the case of the poisoning of the Skripals?
              1. Aaron Zawi
                Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 23: 50
                0
                Quote: stalkerwalker
                Quote: Aron Zaavi
                Until it proves otherwise, this is propaganda.

                Did they learn from Mrs. May that they cry out in the case of the poisoning of the Skripals?

                You are in your own right. And they should even support MORF, only this should not be expected from others.
                1. the lord
                  the lord April 17 2018 04: 52
                  0
                  Ah, ah, how the degradation of the Jews is progressing))))). Right now, during the war, they will collect Amer’s trash in the desert))))) and did not think about the fact that the Americans themselves are now paying these peasants to them. finding these fragments, did not post pictures))))))
      2. Snakebyte
        Snakebyte April 20 2018 10: 08
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        Or can you provide a photo of the objects that destroyed the axes? They beat it at several airfields ... and something after the strike, these airfields continue to function, as before the shelling.

        And what prevents the MO from providing photos of the attacked airfields? For example, Homs, where is the result of the attack "minor damage"? They would have shown to the world that yes, the attack was, the majority repelled, but here are the results of hitting those that broke through.
        That's it, the fact of the strike at the airfields is confirmed.
        Maybe they are hindered by the lack of "minor damage" at the "attacked" airfield?
    3. NEOZ
      NEOZ April 16 2018 11: 36
      +1
      Quote: kipod
      picture of a downed ax

      why do you need?
      what do you go to see there?
      facts from this will remain facts ....
      1. Baloo
        Baloo April 16 2018 12: 54
        +4
        Quote: NEOZ
        Quote: kipod
        picture of a downed ax

        why do you need?
        what do you go to see there?
        facts from this will remain facts ....


        Riyadh expressed a desire for a further US military presence in Syria.
        You know, if you want us to stay, maybe you have to pay.
        - explained the American president.
        At the same time, the Saudi side announced the possibility of joint participation in the attack on Syria the other day

        The polygonal uninvited guest simply has nothing to say, but I want to spit. Polygonal they are:
        The Macington macaques seek to isolate Russia and join forces to destroy Syria as a state. At the heart of the venture is control over the production and transportation of hydrocarbons.
        If we give Syria to slaughter, the Saudis and Qatar carry out their pipelines to Europe and bring down prices, thereby causing enormous damage to the Russian economy. Perhaps Russia's presence in Syria needs to be increased and not only C 300 delivered to Iran and Syria.
        1. NEOZ
          NEOZ April 16 2018 13: 53
          0
          Quote: Balu
          colossal damage to the Russian economy

          if the EU is not interested in gas from the Russian Federation. then sooner or later the EU will refuse gas ...
          we can only delay this decision ...
          examples: SP, SP2, Turkish Stream, Ust Meadows and. etc.
      2. Aaron Zawi
        Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 15: 57
        0
        Quote: NEOZ
        Quote: kipod
        picture of a downed ax

        why do you need?
        what do you go to see there?
        facts from this will remain facts ....

        This is not a fact, but a version from MORF. Possibly quite true, but so far nothing but words has been confirmed.
        1. Ramzaj99
          Ramzaj99 April 16 2018 23: 19
          +1
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          This is not a fact, but a version from MORF. Possibly quite true, but so far nothing but words has been confirmed.

          It is clear that it is difficult to recognize the failure of the owners)))
          Well, here's the evidence for you, there 100% shows how to land at least 3 axes))) And this is above the city. I doubt that someone was shooting over military facilities)
          1. Aaron Zawi
            Aaron Zawi April 16 2018 23: 51
            0
            Quote: Ramzaj99
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            This is not a fact, but a version from MORF. Possibly quite true, but so far nothing but words has been confirmed.

            It is clear that it is difficult to recognize the failure of the owners)))
            Well, here's the evidence for you, there 100% shows how to land at least 3 axes))) And this is above the city. I doubt that someone was shooting over military facilities)

            Well then, where are the remnants of axes?
            1. the lord
              the lord April 17 2018 04: 57
              +1
              But have you seen the fact of a hit? After that, why do you need leftovers? In the Russian Federation, all the remains are transported by special flights. There they are disassembled into atoms in order to understand what and where. 70 axes themselves are not in the same place destroyed. One whole of them is quite possible to assemble. Here in the hangars of a thread of our design bureau puzzles have fun))))) Hi pi ... dosam, thanks for the secrets!))))
            2. Lex.
              Lex. April 19 2018 13: 11
              0
              https://www.google.co.il/search?q=%D1%84%D0%BE%D1
              %82%D0%BE+%D1%81%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8B%D1%85+%D
              1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0
              %BE%D0%B2+%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8&rlz=
              1C1SQJL_ruIL787IL787 & tbm = isch & source = iu & a
              mp; ictx = 1 & fir = lHZzmoiDuW_XAM% 253A% 252CcJzSzAY
              Q72ZKJM% 252C_ & usg = __ J17GBgum0nWFtMuCLIqROF-RW
              S8%3D&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0_4TZjMbaAhXRUlAKH
              ZP4BxcQ9QEIOjAI # imgrc = lHZzmoiDuW_XAM:
            3. Lex.
              Lex. April 19 2018 13: 12
              0
              Is it hard to search the web?
              https://www.google.co.il/search?q=%D1%84%D0%BE%D1
              %82%D0%BE+%D1%81%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8B%D1%85+%D
              1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0
              %BE%D0%B2+%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8&rlz=
              1C1SQJL_ruIL787IL787 & tbm = isch & source = iu & a
              mp; ictx = 1 & fir = lHZzmoiDuW_XAM% 253A% 252CcJzSzAY
              Q72ZKJM% 252C_ & usg = __ J17GBgum0nWFtMuCLIqROF-RW
              S8%3D&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0_4TZjMbaAhXRUlAKH
              ZP4BxcQ9QEIOjAI # imgrc = lHZzmoiDuW_XAM:
          2. Calabi Yau
            Calabi Yau April 19 2018 09: 20
            +1
            The marching engine in the axes of the turbojet engine, in the video, most likely, the operation of the rocket engine missiles. The fact of undermining the warhead of an anti-aircraft missile is visible by the characteristic "umbrella", but whether the destruction of the target occurred while it is not clear.
            And really, where are the carcasses of downed tomahawks? No body, no business)
            Although it seems they say that they took two to Russia. We will see)
      3. konstantin68
        konstantin68 April 16 2018 19: 39
        0
        In general, of course, it is strange that there are no photos.
  4. cedar
    cedar April 16 2018 13: 00
    +3
    Syrian ... anti-aircraft gunners and Syrian ... air defense best wishes in combat and ideological training ..!
  5. Konstantin Yu
    Konstantin Yu April 16 2018 17: 04
    0
    The doctrine is light, and not the doctrine — on the head with an ax — a revision for tired Syrians. US shishis utilized junk and sawed the budget, with the maximum measures possible, and the Syrians gained experience without spending money on targets. It could have been worse than it happened .. Word, some- let off steam, but to us- to learn from this experience ... I hope things will show.
  6. post_al
    post_al April 16 2018 17: 18
    0
    Oddly, the Pentagon claims that all goals are amazed ... As always, the truth is somewhere in the middle ..
  7. pfloyd007
    pfloyd007 April 16 2018 18: 09
    0
    According to the latest data, only 20 pieces were shot down ..
    https://rossaprimavera.ru/news/55619104?utm_refer
    rer = https% 3A% 2F% 2Fzen.yandex.com
  8. NF68
    NF68 April 16 2018 21: 45
    +1
    [/ Quote]
    That is, the fact of cutting heads. Public executions, terrorist attacks around the world in your opinion is not a reason to consider them terrorists. [/ Quote]

    They are "children".
  9. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 April 17 2018 19: 37
    0
    Quote: Vita VKO
    Quote: Sergey-svs
    air defense efficiency is not 70%, but close to 100%! And these are our ancient SAM

    Do not rejoice ahead of time. From the point of view of air defense, the conditions for the combat use of US and British missiles were close to ideal. The calculation commander, although it indicates the presence of interference, but their intensity was clearly small, in addition, more than one air defense object was not hit. From all this we can make an unambiguous conclusion that this strike was of an intelligence-demonstration nature. Now, US analysts will be able to create a model of Syria’s air defense with 90% certainty, including Russian air defense systems, and prepare the next strike in 1-2 months. To prevent this, Russia has the only chance to deliver S-300 air defense systems and Russian combat crews to Syria within a month. It is impossible to prepare Syrian settlements in such a short time.

    You forget that the Syrians have long been studying military affairs in the Russian Federation and the air defense personnel in particular, and I think that they are preparing them not only for the modernized S-200s, I dare to hope for the S-300/400 as well.
  10. hvatitvrat
    hvatitvrat April 18 2018 07: 53
    +1
    Gentlemen, well, you mustn’t be so deceived. Arabian tales are good for reading at night - but not instead of truthful information about the use of generally good equipment, for which in the case of Syria, Russia has never received money.
    They said they shot down? Well, this is easier than knocking down.
    So it is. Blows were carried out only on 3 objects. Thus, all the "downs" over the rest of the objects are bullshit. Either they lie to launch unaccounted-for Russian missiles (although it is hardly possible to lie to Russians about missed launches), or to embellish the percentage of "shot down." Moreover, out of 3 objects, 2 were obviously empty - the Israelis were all there 2 times before ... chile. The Israelis were very indignant at why they hadn’t hit the pressing goals. They explained to them - so as not to catch civilians

    The choice of objects was discussed at the top and it was decided to make the blows purely informational (send a message), and therefore toothless. In order not to kill the Russians - and the Russians are sitting on important objects - they hit empty ones. Moreover, the Russians were informed in advance (several hours before the strike) that they should all be recalled from those 3 objects.

    The Arabs apparently did not bring down anything. Or almost nothing. That was the essence of the message: we can gouge everything here unhindered if Assad throws poison again. If there were Russian calculations at 3 sites, maybe they would have shot down.

    The conclusion is as old as the world: Do not be friends with shit.
  11. hvatitvrat
    hvatitvrat April 18 2018 08: 04
    0
    Quote: Aaron Zawi
    Quote: Ramzaj99
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    This is not a fact, but a version from MORF. Possibly quite true, but so far nothing but words has been confirmed.

    It is clear that it is difficult to recognize the failure of the owners)))
    Well, here's the evidence for you, there 100% shows how to land at least 3 axes))) And this is above the city. I doubt that someone was shooting over military facilities)

    Well then, where are the remnants of axes?

    3 out of 105? Not to mention the fact that such obscure shots can be falsified without difficulty.
    Slowly flying luminous objects can also be drones donated for PR video.
  12. hvatitvrat
    hvatitvrat April 18 2018 08: 14
    +1
    Quote: wvg
    STARTING lasted for an hour! How many times during this time could all the starters be drowned? Or do you think that the Russian Federation really turned a cheek = they say beat, you bastards, you still won’t get to Moscow ...


    Russia framed the Arab cheek, not mine.
  13. hvatitvrat
    hvatitvrat April 18 2018 08: 20
    +1
    Quote: znavel
    But have you seen the fact of a hit? After that, why do you need leftovers? In the Russian Federation, all the remains are transported by special flights. There they are disassembled into atoms in order to understand what and where. 70 axes themselves are not in the same place destroyed. One whole of them is quite possible to assemble. Here in the hangars of a thread of our design bureau puzzles have fun))))) Hi pi ... dosam, thanks for the secrets!))))


    Fellows of what, in what and in what year?
    I do not see a rocket flying at low altitude with high speed.
    Sounds like a fake
  14. hvatitvrat
    hvatitvrat April 18 2018 08: 26
    +2
    Quote: Vlad5307
    Quote: Vita VKO
    Quote: Sergey-svs
    air defense efficiency is not 70%, but close to 100%! And these are our ancient SAM

    Do not rejoice ahead of time. From the point of view of air defense, the conditions for the combat use of US and British missiles were close to ideal. The calculation commander, although it indicates the presence of interference, but their intensity was clearly small, in addition, more than one air defense object was not hit. From all this we can make an unambiguous conclusion that this strike was of an intelligence-demonstration nature. Now, US analysts will be able to create a model of Syria’s air defense with 90% certainty, including Russian air defense systems, and prepare the next strike in 1-2 months. To prevent this, Russia has the only chance to deliver S-300 air defense systems and Russian combat crews to Syria within a month. It is impossible to prepare Syrian settlements in such a short time.

    You forget that the Syrians have long been studying military affairs in the Russian Federation and the air defense personnel in particular, and I think that they are preparing them not only for the modernized S-200s, I dare to hope for the S-300/400 as well.

    Well, yes, they’ve been studying since the 90s. And every time they get too tough