Military Review

May on strike on Syria: acted according to national interests

31
Britain joined its allies to strike at Syrian targets, confident that they were right, reports RIA News statement by the British premiere Theresa May.




To be honest, we acted according to our national interests. It is in our national interest to prevent the use of chemical weapons in Syria in the future, as well as to support the global consensus on the inadmissibility of the use of chemical weapons. We cannot allow the use of chemical weapons norm, neither in Syria, nor in the streets of Great Britain, nor anywhere else,
says the text of the speech, which May will speak today in the parliament of the kingdom.

She noted that several states supported the strikes on Syria.

We did this because we were confident that it was right. And we are not alone. Action expressed broad international support. This weekend I spoke with a number of world leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Italian Prime Minister Paolo Genteloni, Justin Trudeau, Canadian Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, Australian Prime Minister, and Donald Tusk, European Council President. They all expressed support for the actions of Britain, France and America,
noted in the text.

On Monday, the prime minister will also ask the speaker of the House of Commons to hold an emergency debate on the situation around Syria.

Recall last Saturday the United States, Britain and France launched rocket attacks on government facilities of the SAR, which are allegedly used to produce toxic substances. In total, more than one hundred missiles were fired, most of which were destroyed by Syrian air defense. Vladimir Putin called this attack an act of aggression against a sovereign state.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 April 16 2018 08: 04
    +9
    Hitler also acted out of national interests, as did the Anglo-Saxons.
    By the way, enlightened Europe also unanimously supported Hitler's "national interests" in the fight against the "red plague" and the "bloody regime of Stalin" ...
    1. Thrall
      Thrall April 16 2018 08: 10
      +9
      And from the side it looked as if the "dogs of war" staged a "dog wedding" smile
      1. cniza
        cniza April 16 2018 08: 17
        +1
        There will be a trial or not, and they are already acquitting themselves.
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN April 16 2018 11: 03
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          There will be a trial or not, and they are already acquitting themselves.

          It should be! It is just necessary that the world could live peacefully for another 50 years, until the next exacerbation of this infection, history shows that this is not treated, but such pills as the international tribunal temporarily help ...
          May on strike on Syria: acted according to national interests

          What is your pancake (through yat) national interests there? In your bedroom, there is no interest except to fart, but you are looking for something in Syria, Scent away from America and trudge ... angry
      2. Basil50
        Basil50 April 16 2018 08: 19
        0
        Wicked caricature, and not quite true. After the threats of Trump, the military of these countries conducted accelerated and unsuccessful negotiations with both the Syrian and the Russian military on the question - * where can I hit *? And they managed to agree and managed to fulfill the agreement.
        * The wisdom * of those depicted in the caricature is that they * did not notice * the agreements of their own military men and pretend that everything was conceived originally.
        1. venik
          venik April 16 2018 09: 08
          0
          Quote: Vasily50
          the military of these countries conducted accelerated and unsuccessful negotiations with both the Syrian and the Russian military on the question - * where can I hit *?

          ======
          Well, it is - it is unlikely! Rather, on the question of "WHERE DO NOT BEAT!" Here it is - maybe!
    2. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker April 16 2018 08: 29
      +2
      Quote: Alex-a832
      Hitler also acted out of national interests, as did the Anglo-Saxons.
      By the way, enlightened Europe also unanimously supported Hitler's "national interests" in the fight against the "red plague" and the "bloody regime of Stalin" ...

      That's right. Direct analogies suggest themselves with 1939-1940. .... And the planned "investigation" of the OPCW really will not lead to anything. Again there will be streamlined formulations and neutral conclusions "We ourselves are against drinking ...".
      Evgeny Satanovsky rightly noted in his interview
      The results of a recent OPCW investigation into the Skripal case did not provide any new and reliable data. The first thesis of a lengthy investigation is the indisputable fact that former GRU officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter were poisoned. The second is that the substance was a "highly toxic poison." The OPCW has not reported any other information, in particular, the name of the substance and its country of origin ....

      Source: https://inforeactor.ru/146518-satanovskii-rasskaz
      al-kakuyu-pravdu-ozkho-vydast-rossii-po-sirii? utm
      _source = politobzor.net
    3. Vend
      Vend April 16 2018 08: 39
      +1
      Quote: Alex-a832
      Hitler also acted out of national interests, as did the Anglo-Saxons.
      By the way, enlightened Europe also unanimously supported Hitler's "national interests" in the fight against the "red plague" and the "bloody regime of Stalin" ...

      They pointed out where to shoot, set a target so that they didn’t miss, tested the Soviet air defense systems, there were no casualties, even the tractors were safe - and they stinked, as if they won the third world war. They don’t understand one thing, that according to their own data, they destroyed Assad’s chemical weapons. Where will they now take the pretext to fight the Syrian army? Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems after such a "victorious" demonstration, the next step will be the export of Western combatants from Syria.
  2. Kleber
    Kleber April 16 2018 08: 05
    0
    Yes, you did ... what Uncle Joe ordered - that's what you did. Otherwise you would be made.
  3. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov April 16 2018 08: 06
    +3
    We did this because we were confident that it was right.
    It sounds like a defendant’s acquittal in court
  4. anjey
    anjey April 16 2018 08: 07
    +2
    Well, correctly, the Anglo-Saxons should be in one gang, otherwise Russia will quickly break them one by one, the self-preservation instinct of the Anglo-Saxons and nothing more ... but we will break them anyway, sooner or later, let the poor be afraid ....
  5. svp67
    svp67 April 16 2018 08: 12
    0
    Frankly, we acted in accordance with our national interests.
    Honest and you will not say ...

    It is in our national interests to prevent the use of chemical weapons in Syria in the future, as well as to support a global consensus on the inadmissibility of the use of chemical weapons. We cannot allow the use of chemical weapons to be the norm, neither in Syria, nor on the streets of Great Britain, or anywhere else,
    And here is cunning .... But was this application PROVEN? And if proved, did they figure out who did it? Or, as usual, the culprit was appointed, and there "grass does not grow ..."
  6. Normal
    Normal April 16 2018 08: 12
    0
    I wonder what national interests can be defended in another sovereign state? And why not defend the same rights in Saudi Arabia, where they can cut off a Bosko without trial or investigation? And then, what kind of calls with negotiations, when the response is known in advance. Well, I was directly surprised: Canada, Australia, Germany. It was possible not to list these countries, everything here is obviously clear and so.
  7. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch April 16 2018 08: 13
    +1
    may stink. And shoku asahara is her brother.
    1. cniza
      cniza April 16 2018 08: 18
      +3
      She is a child of her nation, which can only spite.
  8. dojjdik
    dojjdik April 16 2018 08: 18
    0
    and this will continue until Assad is hanged and then the Israeli asss will fly over Syria as now over Lebanon, where is Arafat? deep in the grave - and missile bullets across Iran already accusing Ayatola of using some mustard gas or sarin; no, of course, sitting and counting how many missiles were shot down and how many flew this is not the case — it will be when we respond with the same missiles, well you can and old ones, but you need to answer
  9. antivirus
    antivirus April 16 2018 08: 18
    0
    well-done aunt-dodges what is expected of her and retires.
    Bleer also apologized. then. and quiet.
    if only the souls of those killed by her order would not interfere with sleep.
  10. Bootlegger
    Bootlegger April 16 2018 08: 19
    0
    I don’t want to object, but this May really works for the good of his country. Vranje. bombs. reproaches other people's money (runaway oligarchs and not runaway Russian officials). He speaks and does. Unlike our generals in Syria, the Bank of Russia and the deputies of the Duma.
  11. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov April 16 2018 08: 24
    0
    It remains only to find out from May what prevented Assad from using chemical weapons in small Britain earlier?
  12. udincev
    udincev April 16 2018 08: 26
    +2
    It is in our national interests to prevent the use of chemical weapons in Syria in the future

    I don’t know if her thought is good. But the sequel begs. Should the Russian Federation deliver targeted attacks on islands to prevent chemical etching of Russian citizens in the future. And for greater certainty, nuclear weapons would be necessary, of course, in the national interests and having phoned the presidents of some countries, would they support terrorism and the use of chemical weapons.
  13. bogart047
    bogart047 April 16 2018 08: 28
    +2
    in our courtyard, grandmas with a wacky expression on their faces were called "old grymza"
  14. Galleon
    Galleon April 16 2018 09: 03
    0
    If you bomb other countries and cities - their national, not financial interests, then the trial will not take place over the holders of a controlling stake in britania corp., But over their entire nation. In vain May said so.
    1. Kokarev Mikhail
      Kokarev Mikhail April 16 2018 09: 52
      0
      For the sake of excuse, they will throw it off when the time comes, attribute all sins to her, and they themselves will be white and fluffy.
  15. George Koval
    George Koval April 16 2018 09: 13
    +2
    May, with a high degree of probability, used chemical weapons and poisoned Russian citizens on her territory! therefore, Russia, according to May, has every right to launch missile - bomb attacks on Britain! I am for!
  16. Kokarev Mikhail
    Kokarev Mikhail April 16 2018 09: 49
    0
    I believe! Nat Britain's interests are the development of Syrian oil. They will bomb until they share.
  17. K-50
    K-50 April 16 2018 10: 07
    0
    We acted in accordance with our national interests.

    And it turned out: "Well, I could not, could not" request laughing
    The British lion has long turned into a small-shaven mongrel, but without realizing it yet, it continues to be important to puff out cheeks and push.
    Someday, when Russia will end its patience, truly angelic, the British islands will go under water, Russia will expand the channel so that they do not impede navigation, and the air will "clear" the "smell" of the empire over which it once the sun never set. "
  18. taiga2018
    taiga2018 April 16 2018 10: 12
    0
    everything is in accordance with national interests, the poisoning of violins to distract attention from the problems associated with brexitis, attacks on Syria to now distract attention from poisoning of violins ... it’s even scary to imagine what May will do to divert attention from an attack on Syria ...
  19. iouris
    iouris April 16 2018 11: 42
    +1
    It is very likely that the government of T. May could have authorized the use of weapons of mass destruction against a citizen of the Russian Federation and subjects of Her Majesty. Is it possible to bomb a little research center in Porton Down?
  20. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman April 16 2018 13: 21
    0
    Somehow not very high these impudent Saxons rated their natsinterestes-only 4 aircraft. But do they have these interests besides personal ambitions?
  21. vinni-puk
    vinni-puk April 16 2018 19: 40
    0
    The most desirable interest of Russia is to find shavers below the sea level. The fish are not enough food.
  22. razved
    razved April 16 2018 19: 49
    0
    Syria from small Britain is several thousand kilometers away and it has national interests in the Middle East. So what can we say about Russia, which has so many scum grown near it?